Pepsi Next Case Study: Presented by - Surbhi Biyani Harsha Dhoot Prachi Sopariwala

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 26

Pepsi Next Case Study

Presented by –Surbhi Biyani


Harsha Dhoot
Prachi Sopariwala
Objectives
• To provide interesting insights into PepsiCo’s new
product process
• To understand the challenges faced by the company in
launching Pepsi Next
• To analyse the consistencty of PepsiNext’s product
process with the theorectical approach towards
product development
• To critically analyse PepsiNext’s launch strategy
PepsiCo
• Second largest fast food and beverage company in
the world
• House of 22 brands
• Access over 80% of world’s population
• International(non US) market accounts for 50% of
their total revenue
• Strategic Approach –Innovative and adaptive
PepsiCo Brand Structure

PepsiCo

Fun for you Better for you Good For You


(Pepsi , Mountain (Pepsi Max,Diet (Tropicana,Quacker
Dew,Doritos) Pepsi,Lays(oven baked)) Oats,Nut Harvest)
Soft Drink Market
• The US soft drink market generates over $70 billion
in sales
• Late maturity –early decline stage (since 2005)
• New Competitors – Bottled Water , Sports drinks
,Energy drinks
Impact of the emerging subsitutes
on Pepsi
• Decline in Market share to about less than 10%
• Frequent come back with “reduced sugar”drinks
• Declining carbonated drink marke by around 90
million cases a year
• Shift in demand towards bottled water,energy
drinks,soft drinks
Before Pepsi Next
Pepsi Next
• Launched in US market in February 2012
• Mid calorie cold beverage – mix of sugar and artificial
sweeteners
• Delivers full cola taste with reduced calories
• Prime target market – lapsed cola drinkers
Q1

• Outline the new product process for pepsi next.


How consistent is their approach to the process
described marketing textbooks?
What is a new product?
• Open new market
• Improvement and revision

Uses of new product


• Market share
• New segments
New product planning:

Opportunity analysis
• International expansion of Pepsi next
• New products
Threat analysis
• Intense competition
Idea generation

Idea Screening

Concept testing

Strategy
development

Business and
financial analysis

Test marketing

Commercialisation
Idea generation
• Mid calorie cola beverage having full cola taste
with reduced calories

Idea screening
• Target Market: Young generation and people
who are very much health conscious

Concept testing
• Blind taste test in 2011
Marketing strategy development
• Positioning: Healthy product
• Marketing: through TV, heavy free trials, social
media, adds on YouTube etc
• Distribution: Retailers and heavy free samples

Business and financial Analysis


• Market share=1%=$700 million per annum in US
alone

Test marketing
• Pepsi Next was test marketed in Iowa and Wisconsin
• Q2. PepsiCo has been quite persistent with
pursing mid-calories beverage products – why do
you think this ?
Do you agree with the decision to introduce Pepsi
Next ? Why/Why not?
Why new products

• Decreasing market share


• Competitor’s product
• Increased substitutes in market
• Increased health consciousness
• To fill the market gap
Decision to introduce Pepsi Next

• No, We don’t agree with the decision


• Already introduced similar product four times in
the market.
– Pepsi Light, 70 calories
– Jake’s diet Cola, 15 calories
– Pepsi XL, 70 calories
– Pepsi Edge, 70 calories
• Even if could affect its other brand product
Q3. How is the performance and
market acceptance of Pepsi Next
likely to impact the overall brand
equity of Pepsi ?
Should PepsiCo have launched this
product under a new brand instead
?
Pepsi Next impact on overall
brand equity
• If this product does not goes well in market then it
will affect/lower the sales of the other product of the
brand.
• Provide competitive barrier
Launch under new brand –
favorable or not
• No, PepsiCo should not have launched Pepsi Next
under new brand.
– Third wheel syndrome
– Enhancing brand’s image by healthy offering.
– Corporation will be positioned as Innovative
and involved with community
Q4. The launch strategy seemed to
heavily focus on generating trials.
Why was this important?
How else could the launch program
have been structured?
Why focus on trials?
• Fifth attempt at mid-calorie beverage
• To identify consumer behavior
• To identify whether Pepsi consumers are shifting or
the corporation is expanding its consumer base.
Alternative Launch program
• Needful free sample in market
• Post launch promotional campaign
• Promotion through information dissemination
Lessons from the case study

• Product not be judged on Initial Impulsive


buying
• Product can fail even after robust product
development
• Not all positive feedback is good feedback

You might also like