How One Learned To Ornament in Late SixteenthCentury Italy

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Performance Practice Review

Volume 13 | Number 1 Article 6

How one Learned to Ornament in Late Sixteenth-


Century Italy
Timothy J. McGee

Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr


Part of the Music Practice Commons

McGee, Timothy J. (2008) "How one Learned to Ornament in Late Sixteenth-Century Italy," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 13: No.
1, Article 6. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.200813.01.06
Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol13/iss1/6

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
How  One  Learned  to  Ornament  in  Late  Sixteenth-­
Century  Italy  
 
Timothy  J.  McGee    
 
Copyright  ©  2008  Claremont  Graduate  University  
 
 
  Numerous   documents   from   the   early   centuries   make   it   clear   that   ornamentation   was  
expected   of   all   solo   performers,   meaning   not   just   soloists,   but   also   those   who   performed  
polyphonic   music   with   one   person   on   a   part.     In   spite   of   its   omnipresence   during   the   Middle  
Ages  and  Renaissance,   however,   information   about  how  novice   musicians  went  about  learning  
the   technique   is   somewhat   illusive.   For   a   present-­day   musician   wishing   to   recreate   it   or   to  
understand   how   it   interacted   with   the   written   music,   there   are   several   avenues   that   can   be  
followed.   For   the   earlier   centuries   we   can   compare   variant   versions   of   the   same   vocal  
composition,   including   ornate   intabulations   such   as   the   Faenza   codex   and   the   Buxheimer  
manuscript,  which  provide   instrumental  embellishments. 1  There  are  also  occasional   written-­out  
ornamentations   of   vocal   music   over   the   fourteenth   and   fifteenth   centuries   which   provide   a  
glimpse   of   the   extent   and   variety   of   the   tradition;;   we   are   fortunate  that   a   few   composers   were  
sufficiently  obsessive  to  ornament  their  own  compositions;;  Alexander  Agricola  comes  to  mind  as  
a   good   example. 2   But   there   are   no   formal   manuals   intended   to   instruct   performers   about  
ornamentation  practices  until  the  sixteenth  century,  and  even  those  sources  are  not  as  helpful  as  
one  would  wish,  since  they  offer   information  about  what  kinds  of  ornaments  to  use,  but  rarely  
tell   us   where   they   are   to   be   placed   or   how   much   ornamentation   was   expected   in   any   one  
composition.    One  would  assume  that  much  of  that  kind  of  detail  was  learned  through  imitation  
and  observation  or  taught  by  direct  instruction  from  a  master.  It  is  surprising  therefore,  to  read  in  
some  of  the   manuals  that  by   studying  the   material   included   in  them,  the  skill  actually  could   be  
learned  without  a  teacher.  A  close  look  at  the  instruction  manuals  that  survive  will  give  us  some  
idea  of  what  might  have  been  expected  of  both  instrumentalists  and  singers,  which  can  be  used  to  
augment  the  anecdotal  evidence  of  how  one  learned  to  ornament.  
 
    Before  we  take  a  look  at  that  evidence,  however,  it  would  be  well  to  look  closely  at  the  
different   types   of   compositions   that   traditionally   received   ornamentation.     Until   recently   most  
general   discussions   of   sixteenth-­century   ornamentation   seem   to   have   been   based   on   the  
assumption  that  prior  to  the  introduction  of  a  new  dramatic  performance  style  by  Giulio  Caccini,  

                                                                                               
1
Modern   transcriptions  in   Dragan   Plamenac,   ed.,   Keyboard  Music   of   the   Late   Middle  Ages  in  Codex   Faenza   117  
(Rome:   American   Institute   of   Musicology,   1972);;   and   Bertha   Wallner,   ed.,   Das   Buxheimer   Orgelbuch,   Das   Erbe  
deutscher  Musik,  vols.  37-­39  (Kassel:  Bärenreiter,  1958-­59).  
 
2
Alexander  Agricola,  Opera  Omnia,  ed.  Edward  R.  Lerner  ([S.l.]:  AIM,  1961-­70),  vol.  5.      
 
  2  

there   was   only   the   single,   universal   type   of   ornamentation   applied   to   every   conceivable  
composition   type.   That   assumption   was   based   on   the   uniformity   of   much   of   the   available  
material  included  in  the  ornamentation  sources  and  in  the  written-­out  examples.    If  we  look  at  the  
instructions  in  the  1562  letter  of  Maffei,  and  the  manuals  by  Ganassi  (1535),  Ortiz  (1553),  Dalla  
Casa  (1584),  etc.,3  or  the  written-­out  examples  in  a  variety  of  lute  and  keyboard  collections  from  
the  period,  we  find  a  fairly  uniform  set  of  ornamental  examples,  the  very  thing  Caccini  dismissed  
with  WKHSKUDVH³PHUHHDU-­WLFNOLQJ´4  What  he  was  referring  to  were  the  passaggi:  quick-­moving  
ornamental  passages  intended  to  be  inserted  between  written  notes  of  a  composition.  In  modern  
WHUPLQRORJ\ WKH\ ZRXOG EH FDOOHG ³ULIIV´  ,QVWUXFWLRQV LQ WKHVH VDPH Panuals   also   describe  
DQRWKHUW\SHRITXLFNEXWXQZULWWHQRUQDPHQWWKDWZRXOGODWHUEHFDOOHG³JUDFHV´DQGLQGLFDWHGLQ
the   music   by   symbols.   The   popularity   of   both   of   these   types   of   ornamentation   stems   from   the  
ease   with   which   they   can   be   supplied;;   on   the   lowest   level   both   can   be   done   easily   without  
straying  far  from  the  written  note.    Once  the  performer  gets  the  hang  of  it  and  memorizes  a  few  
dozen  set  formulae²which  is  what  the  manuals  all  suggest²it  requires  almost  no  mental  work  
to  apply  them,  and  it  has  the  superficial  reward  of  dazzling  the  listeners.  
 
  Since  Howard  Mayer  Brown  has  done  an  admirable  job  of  analyzing  and  describing  the  
passage-­type  ornamentation  instructions5  it  should  be  sufficient  here  to  summarize  the  approach  
found  in  most  of  the  sources.    The  usual  procedure  is  for  the  authors  to  illustrate  a  simple  interval  
or  a  short  melodic  pattern,  and  follow  that  with  one  or  many  suggested  ways  for  elaborating  it.    
The  manual  then  proceeds  to  another  melodic  pattern  followed  by  another  set  of  ornamentation  
suggestions.  This  format  is  followed  for  pages  and  pages,  usually  in  a  systematic  way  through  a  
graduated   set   of   melodic   patterns   and   modes.     It   was   expected   that   the   learner   would   not   just  
practice  the  illustrated  ornamentations  but  actually  memorize  them  to  the  point  where  they  could  
be   inserted   automatically   when   the   particular   basic   melodic   shape   appeared   in   a   composition.    
The  writers  also  encourage  the  students  to  pick  and  choose  from  the  patterns  according  to  their  
own  tastes  and  abilities,  and  to  strive  to  advance  to  the  point  where  they  could  personalize  their  
ornamentations  by  inventing  their  own  riffs.        
 
  This,   of   course,   results   in   a   fairly   sterile   product:   ornamentation   patterns   applied   to  
melodic  shapes  without  consideration  of  the  musical  context.    Just  as  important  to  the  neophyte  
                                                                                               
3
0DIIHL OHWWHU SXEOLVKHG LQ 1DQLH %ULGJPDQ ³*LRYDQQL &DPLOOR 0DIIHL HW VD OHWWUH VXU OH FKDQW´ Revue   de  
Musicologie  38  (1956):  3-­34;;  Sylvestro  Ganassi,  Opera  intitulata  Fontegara,  Venice  1535,  trans.  and  ed.  Hildemarie  
Peter  (Berlin:  R.  Lienau,  1956);;  Diego  Ortiz,  Tratado  de  glosas  sobra  clausulas  «  Roma  1553,  trans.  and  ed.  Max  
Schneider    (Kassel:  Bärenreiter:  1961);;  Girolamo  Dalla  Casa,  Il  vero  modo  di  diminuir,  2  vols.,  Venice  1584,  facs  
ed.   (Bologna:   Forni   editore,   1970).   For   a   complete   list   of   the   ornamentation   manuals   and   a   discussion   of   their  
contents   see Howard   Mayer   Brown,   Embellishing   16th-­Century   Music,   Early   Music   series   I   (Oxford:   Oxford  
University  Press,  1977).  
 
4
Giulio  Caccini,  Le  Nuove  Musiche,  Florence  1601  [1602],  Recent  Researches  in  the  Music  of  the  Baroque  Era  9,  
trans.  and  ed.  H.  Wiley  Hitchcock  (Madison:  A-­R  Editions,  1970).  
 
5
Brown,  Embellishing  16th-­Century  Music.  
  3  

ornamentor   would   be   instructions   as   to   where   these   kinds   of   riffs   can   be   inserted   in   an   actual  
melodic  line,  and  how  dense  should  be  the  ornamentation  of  any  particular  phrase.  None  of  the  
manuals  actually  address  those  points  at  any  length  in  prose,  although  several  do  include  one  or  
more   well   known   fully   ornamented   melodies,   which   serve   as   illustrations   for   the   placement   of  
the  stock  ornament  patterns.  Lacking  any  detailed  written  analysis,  however,  the  student  is  left  to  
extract   the   principles   of   application   from   the   few   examples,   noticing   where   in   a   phrase   an  
ornament  is  inserted,  and  exactly  which  types  of  ornaments  are  chosen  for  placement  in  various  
melodic  or  cadential  situations.  Ludovico  Zacconi,  for  example,  presents  a  single  full  example,  a  
motet  Quae  est  ista,  and  states  that  motets  are  easier  to  ornament  than  are   madrigals. 6  He  does  
not   mention   chansons   or   any   of   the   instrumental   forms,   although   it   is   clear   that   he   intends   his  
ornamentations  to  be  used  in  those  compositions  as  well.  Nearly  all  of  the  ornamentation  sources  
state  quite  clearly  that  they  are  applicable  to  both  vocal  and  instrumental  practices,  implying  that  
there  was  only  a  single  style  of  ornamentation  to  be  applied  to  all  available  forms  of  music.    
 
  The   increasing   number  of   such   manuals   as  the  sixteenth  century  progressed   is  evidence  
that  little  by  little  they  were  finding  popularity  as  a  source  of  instruction  for  both  instrumentalists  
and   vocalists   wishing   to   learn   how   to  ornament,   and   these   manuals   were   intended   to   augment  
and  possibly  replace  instruction  from  a  teacher.  Present  day  experience  shows  that  it  certainly  is  
possible   to   learn   ornamentation   from   the   manuals,   as   many   modern   performers   have  
demonstrated,  and  it  undoubtedly  would  have  been  far  easier  during  the  late  16th  century,  when  
there   would   have   been   numerous   opportunities   for   a   fledgling   musician   to   hear   competent  
professionals  exercise  their  craft.        
 
  There  is  evidence,  however,  that  in  those  manuals  we  are  seeing  only  a  partial  picture  of  
the  ornamental  performance  practices  during  this  period,  especially  in  terms  of  vocal  music.  The  
repertory   they   address   does   not  represent   all   of   the   compositional   types   popular   in   Italy   at   the  
time,   nor   was   the   delivery   of   all   musical   forms   open   to   the   ornamental   practices   found   in   the  
manuals.   There   is   ample   evidence   of   a   distinct   Neapolitan   vocal   repertory   from   early   in   the  
sixteenth  century;;  one  that  required  a  different,  far  more  dramatic  type  of  performance  approach.  
In  recent  years  John  Walter  Hill  and  Tim  Carter  have  written  about  the  Neapolitan  style  and  its  
popularity   in   Roman   courtly   circles. 7   As   Hill   has   discussed   at   some   length,   that   style   was   the  
EDVLV IRU WKH ³QHZ VW\OH RI VLQJLQJ´ EURXJKW WR )ORUHQFH IURP 5RPH by   Giulio   Caccini   in   the  
1560s;;   a   style   of   delivery   and   ornamentation   quite   distinct   from   that   applied   to   the   repertory  

                                                                                               
6
³3HUFKHL0DGULJDOLRUGLQDULDPHQWHVRQSLXGLIILFLOLGHL0RWHWWL´/XGRYLFR=DFFRQLPrattica  di  musica    (Venice:  
Girolamo  Polo,  1592,  repr.  Bologna:  Forni  editore,  1967),  64v.  
 
7
See  -RKQ:DOWHU+LOO³2UDWRU\0XVLFLQ)ORUHQFH,Recitar  Cantando,  1583-­´Acta  Musicologica  51  (1979):  
108-­136;;   and  Roman  Monody,  Cantata,   and   Opera   from   the   Circles  Around   Cardinal   Montalto,  2   vols.   (Oxford:  
Clarendon  Press,  1997);;  7LP&DUWHU³$)ORUHQWLQH:HGGLQJRI´Acta  musicologica  55  (1983):  89-­107;;  and  
³*LXOLR &DFFLQL¶V $PLULOOL PLD EHOOD 6RPH 4XHVWLRQV DQG D )HZ $QVZHUV ´ Journal   of   the   Royal   Musical  
Association  113/2  (1988):  250-­273.  
 
  4  

addressed  in  the  ornamentation  sources. 8    


 
  There  are  essential  differences  between  the  Neapolitan  dramatic  style  of  song  and  that  to  
which   the   riff-­type   ornaments   were   applied.     The   music   that   received   passaggi   can   be  
characterized   as   quite   regular   in   its   elements:   a   regular   tempo   which   often   is   dance-­based   in  
terms  of  rhythmic  organization;;  relatively  short  and  even  phrase  periods;;  and  a  clearly  sculptured  
melody.   In   contrast,   the   Neapolitan   style   is   irregular.     It   has   passages   that   are   not   kept   at   a  
regular  pace;;  the  rhythm  of  the  melody  follows  the  text  and  is  often  irregular;;  the  phrase  lengths  
are  varied  and  often  unequal;;  and  the  melodic  profile  often  has  what  we  would  call  recitative-­like  
sections²repeated  notes,  and  passages  with  limited  melodic  range  which  are  intended  to  be  sung  
freely   in   order   to   express   the   text.9   What   Caccini   brought   north,   therefore,   was   a   highly  
developed  dramatic  performance  style  that  demanded  a  different  type  of  ornamentation,  one  that  
he   developed   and   exploited   throughout   his   career.   The   style   has   been   credited   to   him   as   its  
originator,  although  he  never  claimed  to  have  invented  it. 10      
 
  Caccini  was   not  alone   in  the  North  as  a  representative  of  the  southern  style;;  throughout  
the   late   sixteenth   century   and   well   into   the   seventeenth,   there   was   continuing   contact   and  
exchange   of   northern   and   southern   singers,   which   was   especially   active   among   the   courts   in  
FloUHQFH)HUUDUDDQG0DQWXDLQWKHQRUWKDQG&DUGLQDO0RQWDOWR¶VFLUFOHRIDUWLVWVDQGSDWURQV
in  Rome. 11  Although  the  basic  elements  of  the  southern  style  seem  to  have  originated  in  monodic  
performance,  by  the  late  sixteenth  century  a  number  of  composers  had  incorporated  the  style  into  
ensemble  compositions.    In  his  Discorso,  Vincenzo  Giustiniani  highlights  the  two  different  styles  
by   noting   that   as   early   as   the   1570s   the   style   of   monodic   singing   in   Rome   as   practiced   by   the  
singers   Giovanni   Andrea,   Giulio   Cesare   Brancaccio,   and   Alexandro   Merlo   was   quite   different  
from  that  applied  to  the  music  of  Palestrina  and  others.    He  then  goes  on  to  note  that  composers  
such  as  Giaches  de  Wert  in  Mantua  and  Luzzasco  Luzzaschi  in  Ferrara  had  adopted  some  of  the  
dramatic   monodic  practices   in  the  polyphonic   music  they   wrote  for  the   concerti  delle  donne   in  
those  two  northern  cities. 12  His  description  of  the  style  as  adapted  to  ensemble  performance   by  
the  donne,  is  quite  helpful  in  its  presentation  of  the  basic  elements  of  the  southern  style:  
 
³7KH\ LQFUHDVHG WKHLU YRLFHV ORXG RU VRIW KHDY\ RU OLJKW DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH
demands  of  the  piece  they   were  singing;;  now  slow,  breaking  off   with  sometimes  gentle  
                                                                                               
8
Hill,  Roman  Monody,  1:119-­20.  
 
9
Hill  refers  to  the  st\OHDV³UHFLWDWLRQDO´,ELG75.  
 
10
Ibid.,  1:58.  
 
11
See  the  discussion  in  Ibid.,  especially  1:25-­48.  
 
12
Vincenzo  Giustiniani,  Discorso  sopra  la  musica,  ca.  1628,  Musicological  Studies  and  Documents  9,  trans.  Carol  
MacClintock  (Rome:  AIM,  1962),  69.  
  5  

sighs,  now   singing  long  passages  legato  or  detached,  now   groups,  now  leaps,  now   with  
long  trills,  now  with  short,  and  again  with  sweet  running  passages  sung  softly,  to  which  
sometimes  one  heard  an  echo  answer  unexpectedly.  They  accompanied  the  music  and  the  
sentiment   with   appropriate   facial   expressions,   glances   and   gestures,   with   no   awkward  
movements   of   the   mouth   or   hands   or   body   which   might   not   express   the   feeling   of   the  
song.    They  made  the  words  clear  in  such  a  way  that  one  could  hear  even  the  last  syllable  
of   every   word,   which   was   never   interrupted   or   suppressed   by   passages   and   other  
embellishments.     They   used   many   other   particular   devices   which   will   be   known   to  
13
SHUVRQVPRUHH[SHULHQFHGWKDQ,´  
 
  That   style,   as   practiced   and   promoted   by   Giulio   Caccini,   his   family   and   students,   was  
highly  respected  and  wildly  popular,  both  in  Italy  and  in  foreign  courts.14  In  1583  Giulio  visited  
the   court   of   Ferrara   where   he   impressed   Duke   Alfonso   II   with   his   singing   and   was   himself  
impressed  by  the  famous  concerto  delle  donne.  This  resulted  in  a  request  shortly  afterward  that  
he  add  his  style  of  ornamentation  to  madrigals  written  for  the  donne  by  Alessandro  Striggio.15  In  
1592   he   was   again   invited   to   Ferrara   to   perform   for   the   Duke   and   to   coach   the   donne   in   his  
singing   style.16   ,Q  KH KLV ZLIH DQG WZR GDXJKWHUV ZHUH LQYLWHG E\ 0DULD GH¶ 0HGLFL to  
perform  in  Paris  at  the  court  of  Henry  the  IV,  where  they  were  the  recipients  not  only  of  much  
praise,  but  also  lavish  gifts.  They  remained  at  the  French  court  for  approximately  six  months  and  
during   that   time   had   impressed   the   Duke   of   Lennox,   who   in   turn   invited   them   to   London   to  
entertain  the  Queen  of  England.  Permission  to  travel  to  England  was  not  granted,  and  the  family  
returned   to   Florence,   stopping   along   the   way   in   Turin   for   a   short   time,   once   again   to   much  
acclaim  and  many  gifts. 17    
 
  It   is   clear   that   Giulio   was   not   just   demonstrating   his   talents   on   these   visits,   but   also  
teaching  his  style  of  performance  to  local  singers.  In  a  letter  relating  details  of  his  1592  visit  to  
)HUUDUD&DFFLQLWHOOVXVRIWKH'XNH³6LQFHKHHQMR\HGP\PDQQHURIVLQJLQJ,  today  he  begged  
me   (this   was   the   word   he   used)   to   favor   him   both   by   teaching   his   three   ladies   something   with  
these  accenti  and  passaggi  of  ours  and   by  writing  a   few  diminutions  on  a   favorite   bass  of   his.    

                                                                                               
13
Idem.  
 
14
)RUFRQWHPSRUDU\TXRWDWLRQVDERXW&DFFLQL¶VVLQJLQJVHH  Warren  Kirkendale,  The  Court  Musicians  in  Florence  
During  the  Principate  of  the  Medici  (Florence:  Olschki,  1993),  154-­8.
 
15
See   Anthony   Newcomb,   The   Madrigal   at   Ferrara,   1579-­1597,   2   vols.   (Princeton:   Princeton   University   Press,  
1980),  1:56.  
 
16
Ibid,  58.  
 
17
TLP &DUWHU ³&DFFLQL *LXOLR´ The   New   Grove   Dictionary   of   Music   and   Musicians,   vol.   4,   ed.   Stanley   Sadie  
(London,  New  York:  Macmillan  Publishers,  2001),  769-­75.  
 
  6  

Thus  for  three  hours  I  taught  some  Arie  to  these  ODGLHVLQWKHSUHVHQFHRI+LV+LJKQHVV´ 18  
 
On   a   more   local   level,   in   addition   to   the   many   Florentine   court   singers   who   were   his  
students,   Caccini   also   taught   in   the   community.     He   regularly   visited   the   convent   of  
Montedomini   to   teach   singing   to   the   nuns, 19   and   in   a   letter   of   1597   he   singles   out   one   of   the  
nuns,  Sister  Clarice  Baldovinetti,  as  being  especially  talented,  and  states  that  he  taught  her  and  
the  other  nuns  i  gorgiamenti²ornamentation.    The  occasion   for  his   letter  was  to  complain  that  
the  Vicar   had   canceled   his  permission  to  visit  the  convent  because  the  singing  of  the   nuns   had  
become   so   popular   that   many   citizens   were   flocking   to   the   convent   to   hear   them,   and   the  
archbishop  thought  it  was  improper.20  
 
  More  striking  evidence  of  the  popularity  of  the  dramatic  singing  style  can  be  seen   from  
the   contest   held   in   Rome   in   1623   between   two   of   the   most   famous   singers   of   the   early  
VHYHQWHHQWKFHQWXU\)UDQFHVFD&DFFLQL ³/D&HFFKLQD´ DQGWKH5RPDQWUDLQHGVLQJHU $GULDQD
%DVLOH ³/¶$GULDQD´ 7KHUHZDVDGLIIerence  of  opinion  among  members  of  the  Medici  circle  as  
to   which   of   the   two   singers   was   the   more   talented.   To   resolve   the   dispute   the   poet   Giovanni  
Battista  Marini,  a  member  of  the  circle,  produced  an   ottava  rima  on  the  subject  of  Adonus,  and  
the   two   sopranos   were   invited   on   successive   evenings   to   demonstrate   their   talents   before   a  
distinguished  audience  by  improvising  both  melody  and  accompaniment  without  having  seen  the  
WH[WEHIRUHKDQG7KHMXGJHPHQWZDVWKDW³/D&HFFKLQD´KDGWKHVXSHULRUPXVLFDOXQGHUVtanding  
(GLPROWRSLVDSHUHHSDGURQDGHOO¶DUWH ZKHUHDV³/¶$GULDQD´KDGDEHWWHUYRLFHDQGDELOLW\WR
express  (alquanto  migliore  voce  et  artifiziosa  negli  affetti).21  The  deciding  factor,  which  caused  
the  listeners  to  declare  Francesca  Caccini  the  winner,  was  her  ability  to  match  her  performance  to  
WKHWH[WWKHHOHPHQWWKDWZDVXVXDOO\VLQJOHGRXWWRSUDLVHKHUIDWKHU¶VSHUIRUPDQFHV  
 
  :H GR KDYH VRPH UHIHUHQFHV DV WR KRZRQH PLJKW OHDUQ WR SHUIRUP LQ *LXOLR &DFFLQL¶V
style.   The   introduction   in   his   second   volume   of   songs   in   1614   states   that   he   has   added   to   his  
publication   ornamentation   not   often   seen   in   print.   Because   of   this,   he   claims   the   edition   is   so  
                                                                                               
18
Quoted  in  Newcomb,  The  Madrigal  at  Ferrara,  1:58.  
 
19
Vocal   and   instrumental   performance   by   nuns   in   a   convent   was   apparently   not   unusual.   Bottrigari   praises   the  
performances  of  nuns  in  Ferrara  at  the  church  of  St.  Vito,  and  singles  out  their  talented   maestra  who  is  also  a  nun,  
and  although  he  says  that  the  performance  is  unusual  because  of  its  quality,  he  does  not  imply  that  the  practice  itself  
is   unusual.   Hercole   Bottrigari,   Il   Desiderio   (1594,   repr.,   Forni   editore   Bologna,   1969);;   Translation   of   second   ed.  
1599  by  Carol  MacClintock  ([n.p.]:  AIM  1962),  59-­61.
 
20
&DFFLQL¶V OHWWHU LV IRXQG LQ $6) 0HGLFHo   filza   882,   fol.   456,   Giulio   Caccini   in   Firenze   to   Belisario   Vinta   1  
December,  1597.  Reproduced  in  Warren  Kirkendale,  The  Court  Musicians  in  Florence  During  the  Principate  of  the  
Medici,  132.  Also  see  ASF:  Mediceo,  filza  882,  fol.  457,  in  which  the  vicar  replies  and  explains  the  problem.  
 
21
The   information   is   included   in   a   letter   from   Antonio   Galli   to   the   Medici   court,   11   November   1623,   ASF:  
0HGLFHR ILO]D   $ SRUWLRQ RI LW LV SULQWHG LQ (OOHQ 5RVDQG ³%DUEDUD 6WUR]]L virtuosissima   cantatrice:   the  
ComSRVHU¶VYRLFH´JAMS  31  (1978):  241-­81,  at  254,  n.  31.  
  7  

KHOSIXOD VLQJHUFDQ OHDUQWKHVW\OHZLWKRXWIXUWKHUDVVLVWDQFH IURP KLP ³LW LVVKRZQWKDWZLWK


this   new   way,   and   practice   in   it,   all   the   delicacies   of   this   art   can   be   learned   without   having   to  
hear   the   composer   sing;;   adorned   with   diminutions,   tremolos,   trills,   and   new   effects   for   the  
WKRURXJK WUDLQLQJ RI DQ\RQH ZLVKLQJ WR EH DQ H[SHUW LQ VROR VRQJ´ 22   Since   the   material   in   the  
second   publication   does   not   differ   from   that   of   his   first   in   1602,   Wiley   Hitchcock   has   argued  
convincingly  that  he  was  referring  to  the  earlier  collection  of  songs  as  well, 23  allowing  us  to  use  
information  in  both  sources  in  order  to  identify  the  elements  of  his  style.  
 
  )URP &DFFLQL¶V VWDWHPHQWZHFDQ LQIHUWKDWLQ KLVRSLQLRQSUHYLRXVWRWKHSXEOLFDWLRQV
the  only  way  one  could  learn  his  style  of  interpretation  was  to  study  directly  with  the  master,  and  
in  fact,  there  is  some  evidence  that  this  was  the  way  things  were  done,  as  is  clear  in  several  of  the  
DQHFGRWHVUHSRUWHGDERYH&HUWDLQO\&DFFLQL¶VZLYHVGDXJKWHUVDQGVRQOHDUQHGWKHVW\OHLQWKLV
manner.   He   also   claims   to   have   taught   his   style   to   Vittoria   Archilei,   another   of   the   Florentine  
court  virtuosi  shared  with  Cardinal  Montalto,  as  well  as  numerous  other  singers. 24  His  fame  as  a  
teacher   was   such   that   in   1603,   as   a   part  of   the   employment   negotiations   between   the   Gonzaga  
court   in   Mantua   and   the   father   of   the   thirteen   year-­old   sRSUDQR &DWHULQD 0DUWLQHOOL ³/D
5RPDQLQD´ LQ5RPHLWZDVSURSRVHGWKDWVKHILUVWWUDYHOWR)ORUHQFHDQGVWD\ZLWKWKH&DFFLQLV
for   a   while   in   order   to   learn   first-­hand   from   the   master.25     The   arrangements   were   eventually  
changed  and  she  went  directly  to  Mantua  to  stay  with  Claudio  Monteverdi  and  his  wife,  but  the  
original   arrangement   tells   us   again   that   direct   contact   with   the   teacher   was   considered   to   be  
important  in  order  to  learn  the  dramatic  style  of  singing.  
 
  We  also  have  information  regarding  the  way  in  which  Ginevra  Mazieri  learned  her  part  as  
La  Tragedia  for  the  1600  presentation  of  Euridice.    Although  the  bulk  of  the  music  heard  during  
the  first  performance  of  that  opera  was  written  by  Jacopo  Peri,  Giulio  Caccini  had  insisted  that  
all  singers  who  were  under  his  control  would  sing  the  music  that  he  wrote.  That  would  certainly  
include  Ginevra,  who  did   not  study  directly  with   the   master  himself,   but  with  his  son,  Pompeo  
Caccini.  The  part  Ginevra  was  to  learn,  the  Prologue,  consists  of  exactly  twelve  bars  of  music,  to  
which  she  was  to  set  seven  four-­line  verses  of  text.  Pompeo  was  sent  to  her  home  in  the  months  
preceding  the  October  performance  in  order  to  instruct  her  in  the  proper  manner  of  presenting  it.    

                                                                                               
22
³Nelle   quali   si   dimostra,   che   da   tal   Maniera   di   scrivere   con   la   pratica   di   essa   si   possano   apprendere   tutte   le  
VTXLVLWH]]HGLTXHVW$UWHVHQ]DQHFHVVLWjGHO&DQWRGHOO¶$XWRUH$GRUQDWHGL3DVVDJJLTrilli,  Gruppi,  e  nuovi  affetti  
SHU YHUR HVHUFL]LR GL TXDOXQTXH YRJOLD SURIHVVDUH GL FDQWDU VROR´ )URP WKH WLWOH SDJH RI WKH  SXEOLFDWLRQ
Reproduced   in   Giulio   Caccini,   Nuove   Musiche   e   Nuova   Maniera   di   Scriverle   (1614),   Recent   Researches   in   the  
Music  of  the  Baroque  Era  28,  ed.  H.  Wiley  Hitchcock  (Madison:  A-­R  Editions,  1978).  
 
23
Idem.  
 
24
For   more   discussion   of   singers   shared   between   Florence   and   the   court   of   Cardinal   Montalto   see   Hill,   Monody,  
1:42-­7.  
 
25
See  Edmund  6WUDLQFKDPSV³7KH/LIHDQG'HDWKRI&DWHULQD0DUWLQHOOL´Early  Music  History  5  (1986):  159-­60.  
  8  

There  is  no  record  of  exactly  how  many  hours  were  required  to  teach  the  young  Florentine  singer  
WKLV VHHPLQJO\ VPDOO TXDQWLW\ RI PXVLF LQ *LQHYUD¶V PRWKHU¶V ODZVXLW LW LV FODLPHG WKDW ³KH
>3RPSHR@KDGIUHTXHQWHGKHUKRXVH IRUDORQJWLPH´,QWKHFRXUVHRIWKHVLQJLQJ LQVWUXFWLRQV
however,   the   two   young   people   became   enamored   of   one   another,   which   resulted   in   Pompeo  
being  sued  for  paternity  in  February  of  1601,  four  months  after  the  performance. 26        
 
  ,IZHEHOLHYH&DFFLQL¶VVWDWHPHQWRQFHKLVPDWHULDOZDVDYDLODEOHLQSULQWLWZDVQR
longer  necessary  to  consult  a  teacher  in  order  to  learn  his  performance  style.    A  close  look  at  the  
music  in  both  the  1602  and  1614  publications,  however,  does  not  inspire  much  confidence  in  his  
claim.     The   printed   music   actually   contains   only   a   small   quantity   of   the   details   necessary   to  
SHUIRUPLQDZD\WKDWLVGHVFULEHGLQWKHFRQWHPSRUDU\DFFRXQWVDQGLQ&DFFLQL¶VRZQUHPDUNV
about  the  style.    What  has  been  added  to  the  songs  in  the  1602  collection  is  mainly  the  notation  
of  short,  irregular  rhythmic  ornaments  for  selected  syllables  (mostly  the  penultimate  syllable  of  a  
text  phrase),  along  with  a  few  extended  passaggi,  and  a  few  symbols  for  trillo  (rapid  reiteration  
of  a  single  pitch)  or  gruppo  (a  modern  trill).  In  the  second  collection  there  is  an  increase  in  the  
quantity   of   short   rhythmic   ornaments   and   short   passaggi,   as   well   as   more   variety   of   rhythmic  
groupings   within   them.     He   also   includes   a   few   cascate,   a   quick-­moving   descending   ornament  
that  was  discussed,  but  not  notated  in  the  earlier  collection.    In  neither  collection,  however,  does  
he   indicate   the   other   ornaments   discussed   in   the   preface   of   his   first   publication:   esclamazioni;;  
intonatione  della  voce;;  messa  da  voce,  although  it  is  clear  from  his  instructions  that  they  are  to  
be  added  by  the  singer.  And  at  no  point  is  there  any  indication  of  the  wide  range  of  dynamics  and  
vocal   inflections   that   were   the   most   distinctive   element   of   the   style;;   the   kind   of   dramatic  
presentation   described   by   Giustiniani   in   the   quote   above,   and   which   Merin   Mersenne   tells   us  
distinguished  the  Italian  singing  style  from  the  French:  
 
³7KH ,WDOLDQV LQ WKHLU UHFLWDWLYHV WKH\ REVHUYH PDQ\ WKLQJV RI ZKLFK RXUV DUH GHSULYHG
because  they  represent  as  much  as  they  can  of  the  passions  and  affections  of  the  soul  and  
spirit,  as,   for   example,  anger,   furor,   disdain,  rage,   frailties  of   the  heart,   and  many   other  
passions,  with  a  violence  so  strange  that  one  would  almost  say  that  they  are  touched  by  
the  same  emotions  they  are  representing  in  the  song;;  whereas  our  French  are  content  to  
tickle   the   ear,   and   have   a   perpetual   sweetness   in   their   songs,   which   deprives   them   of  
27
HQHUJ\´  
   
  The   addition   of   passaggi   to   written   music   could   already   be   found   in   earlier  
RUQDPHQWDWLRQ PDQXDOV DV ZHOO DV RWKHU PDQXVFULSWV DQG SXEOLFDWLRQV LQFOXGLQJ &DFFLQL¶V
ornamentations   for   the   Ferrara   donne  DQG V\PEROV LQGLFDWLQJ ³JUDFHV´ KDG EHHQ DURXQG IRU
                                                                                               
26
)RU GHWDLOV RI WKH VXLW DQG WUDQVFULSWLRQV RI WKH GRFXPHQWV VHH 7LPRWK\ - 0F*HH ³3RPSHR &DFFLQL DQG
µ(XULGLFH¶ 1HZ %LRJUDSKLFDO 1RWHV´ Renaissance   and   Reformation/Renaissance   et   Réforme   26   (1990)   [1991]:  
81-­99.  
 
27
Marin   Mersenne,   Harmonie   universelle,   contenant   la   Theorie   et   la   Pratique   de   la   Musique   (Paris:   Cramiosy,  
1636,  Vol.  II),  354-­60;;  translated  in  Carol  MacClintock,  Readings,  173.  
  9  

VHYHUDO KXQGUHG \HDUV &DFFLQL¶V FODLP WR QRYHOW\ LQ WHUPV RI ZULWWHQ-­out   ornamentation,  
therefore,  really  was  restricted  to  the  shorter  rhythmic  passages  and  the  cascate,  which  he  states  
should   be   performed   exactly   as   notated.28   This   alone   would   not   be   much   help   to   an   aspiring  
singer   attempting   to   learn   the   Neapolitan/Caccini   dramatic   style   without   the   aid   of   a   teacher.    
Many   additional   elements   are   necessary,   including   an   ability   to   interpret   affect,   and   especially  
the  execution  of   sprezzatura,  that  illusive  term  that  Caccini  himself  emphasizes  is  so  important  
to  the  graceful  execution  of  a  song.    He  does  discuss  these  elements   in  the  preface  to  his  1614  
work   where   he   names   three   things   necessary   for   those   who   would   learn   to   sing   well   and   with  
expression:   affect,   variety   of   affect,   and   sprezzatura   (affetto,   la   varietà   di   quello,   e   la  
sprezzatura).  He  goes  on  to  elaborate  a  bit  on  these  elements,  describing  affect  as  the   ability  to  
express   the   meaning   of   words   by   use   of   a   variety   of   dynamics   that   match   the   emotion   of   the  
words,  and  sprezzatura  as  the  charm  rendered  to  a  song  by  the  performance  of  the  written  notes  
with   some   freedom.   Sprezzatura   is   a   difficult   word   to   translate,   it   is   usually   translated   as  
³QHJOLJHQFH´ RU ³QRQFKDODQFH´ ,Q FRQWH[W &DFFLQL VHHPV WR EH UHIHUULQJ WR WKH LQVHUWLRQ RI
short,  quick-­moving  ornaments,  but  the  way  he  chooses  to  explain  his  idea  is  interesting:  
 
³Sprezzatura   is   that   charm   given   to   a   song   by   the  rapid   succession   of   several   eighth   or  
sixteenth  notes  on  various  tones,  which,  when  done  at  the  right  time  relieve  the  song  of  a  
certain  restricted  narrowness  and  dryness  and  make  it  pleasant,  free,  and  airy,  just  as  in  
common   speech   eloquence   and   fluency   make   pleasant   and   sweet   the   matters   being  
expressed.    And  with  respect  to  this  eloquence,  I  would  liken  to  the  rhetorical  figures  and  
shadings,   the   passaggi,   trilli,   and   other   similar   ornaments,   which   can   be   introduced  
29
sparingly  in  every  affect´  
 
  What   is   being   described   is   a   specific   type   of   melodic-­rhythmic   ornament,   but  
unfortunately   the   statement   is   unclear   as   to   the   particulars   of   when   it   is   used   and   where   it   is  
placed.    In  this  case,  as  with  all  of  his  statements  about  the  dramatic  ornaments,  it  is  difficult  to  
imagine  how  any  singer  could  learn  this  style  without  considerable  additional  help.  But  a  hint  as  
WRZKHUHVRPHRIWKDWDGGLWLRQDODVVLVWDQFHFRXOGEHIRXQGOLHVLQ&DFFLQL¶VFRPSDULVRQRIVRPH
of   the   ornaments   to   rhetorical   figures   and   shadings.     These   were   a   part   of   the   area   of   rhetoric  
known  as  oration,  a  subject  widely  taught  in  Italian  schools,  and  therefore  an  area  quite  familiar  

                                                                                               
28
For  a  summary  and  discussion  of  what  Caccini  claims  about  his  singing  style,  see  Hill,  Monody,  1:58.  
 
29
³/DVSUH]]DWXUDqTXHOODOHJJLDGULDODTXDOHVLGDDOFDQWRFR¶OWUDVFRUVRGLSLFURPHHVLPLFURPHVRSUDGLYHUVH
FRUGH FR¶O TXDOH IDWWR j WHPSR WRJOLHQGRVL DO FDQWR XQD FHUWD WHUPLQDWD DQJXVWLD H VHFFKH]]D   si  rende   piacevole,  
licenzioso,  e  arioso,  si  come  nel  parlar  comune  la  eloquenza,  e  la  fecondia  rende  agevoli,  e  dolci  le  cose  di  cui  si  
favella.     Nella   quale   eloquenza   alle   figure,   e   à   i   colori   rettorici   assimiglierei,   i   passaggi,   i   trilli,   e   gli   altri   simili  
RUQDPHQWLFKHVSDUVDPHQWHLQRJQLDIIHWWRVLSRVVRQRWDO¶RUDLQWURGXUUH´6HHSKRWRUHSURGXFWLRQLQ&DFFLQLNuove  
Musiche,   ed.   Hitchcock,   preface   (no   page   nos.).     I   am   grateful   to   Guido   Olivieri   for   assistance   with   this   difficult  
passage.  
 
  10  

to  all  singers. 30  &DFFLQLLQWXUQLVFRXQWLQJRQWKHUHDGHUV¶NQRZOHGJHRIRUDWRULFDOWHFKQLTXHVDs  


a  way  to  understand  affect  as  well  as  how  to  use  the  other  ornaments.    
 
  Rhetorical   delivery   was   usually   associated   with   another   dramatic   vocal   style   and  
repertory  that  already  was  present  in  Florence  when  Caccini  arrived:  the   cantare  DOO¶LPSURYYLVR  
tradition,   which   was   widely   practiced   throughout   Italy,   and   which   would   seem   to   be   closely  
related   to   the   Neapolitan   style.   By   looking   closely   at   the   rhetorical   style   as   it   related   to   the  
dramatic   style   of   the   FDQWDUH DOO¶LPSURYYLVR tradition,   it   is   possible   to   obtain   a   clearer   idea   of  
what  Caccini  was  trying  to  tell  singers  about  his  dramatic  style  of  ornamentation.  
 
  The   heritage  of  FDQWDUHDOO¶LPSURYYLVR  was  the   ancient  tradition  of  the   village   bard  and  
later,  the   troubadour;;  the   practice   of   improvising   simple   melodies   to   enhance   poetry.     It   was   a  
tradition  that  was  still  present  to  some  degree  in  all  areas  of  Europe  in  the  late  Middle  Ages,  and  
which  continued  to  have  a  rather  high  profile  in  Italy  as  late  as  the  seventeenth  century. 31  In  the  
mid-­sixteenth   century   there   was   even   a   debate   in   Florence   at   the   distinguished   Accademia  
Fiorentina,  in  which  the  speakers  identified  the  DOO¶LPSURYYLVR  style  as  a  national  Italian  product  
as   contrasted   with   written   polyphony,   which   was   identified   as   Northern   European²foreign.32  
Delivery   of   poetry   DOO¶LPSURYYLVR was   highly   dramatic,   and   it   was   that   tradition   which   was  
referred   to   in   terms   of   the   rhetorical   style   in   music   treatises   of   the   time.   Nicola   Vicentino,   for  
example  in  his  /¶DQWLFDPXVLFDULGRWWDDOODPRGHUQDSUDWWLFa  of  1555,  states:  
 
  ³7KHH[SHULHQFHRIWKHRUDWRUWHDFKHVXVWKLVIRUZHREVHUYHWKHPHWKRGWKDWKH
adopts  in  his  oration,  that  now  he  speaks  with  force,  and  now  soft,  now  a  bit  slower,  now  
a  bit  faster,  and  by  this  means  greatly  moves  the  listeners,  and  this  method  of  changing  
33
the  pace  greatly  affects  the  spirit.  And  thus  one  should  sing  improvised  music  in  such  a  

                                                                                               
30
On  rhetoric  and  schools  see  Paul  F.  Grendler,  Schooling  in  Renaissance  Italy:  Literacy  and  Learning,  1300-­1600  
(Baltimore:   John   Hopkins   University   Press,   1989);;   and   Albert   Rabil,   ed.,   Renaissance   Humanism:   Foundations,  
Forms,  and  Legacy,  3  vols.  (Philadelphia:  University  of  Pennsylvania,  1988).  
 
31
2QWKHKLVWRU\RIWKHWUDGLWLRQVHH(]LR/HYL³,FDQWDULOHJJHQGDUL´Giornale  Storico  della  Letteratura  Italiana,  
6XSSO    DQG -DPHV +DDU ³,PSURYYLVDWRUL DQG 7KHLU 5HODWLRQVKLS WR 6L[WHHQWK-­&HQWXU\ 0XVLF´ LQ   his  
Essays   on   Italian   Poetry   and   Music   in   the   Renaissance,   1350-­1600   (Berkeley   and   Los   Angeles:   University   of  
California   Press,   1986),   76-­  2Q UHDVRQV IRU LWV GHPLVH LQ WKH VHYHQWHHQWK FHQWXU\ VHH ,YDQR &DYDOOLQL ³VXJOL
improvvisatori  del  Cinque-­SeiceQWRSHUVLVWHQ]HQXRYLUHSRUWRULHTXDOFKHULFRQRVFLPHQWR´Recercare  I  (1989):  23-­
40.  
 
32
Robert  Nosow,  ³7KH'HEDWHRYHU6RQJLQWKH$FFDGHPLD)LRUHQWLQD´Early  Music  History  21,  (2002):  175-­221.  
 
33
9LFHQWLQR¶VSKUDVHKHUHIRULPSURYLVHGPXVLFMusica  alla  mente,  contrasts  it  with  cantare  super  librum,  meaning  
WR VLQJ FRPSRVHG PXVLF  ,W LV IUHTXHQWO\ PLVWUDQVODWHG DV ³PHPRUL]HG PXVLF´ EXW VHH (UQVW )HUDQG,   Die  
Improvisation   in   der   Musik   (Zurich:   Rhein-­9HUODJ  &KDSWHU 9 5RGROIR %DURQFLQL ³$ PHQWH H DOLEUR´LQ
$UWLVDQRHVRQDGRUIRUPD]LRQHVWDWXVHFRPSHWHQ]HGHOORVWUXPHQWLVWDGHO¶,  ed.  Mauro  Odorizzi  and  Maurizio  
  11  

way  as  to  imitate  the  accents  and  effects  of  the  different  parts  of  the  oration.  If  an  Orator  
would   attempt   to   make   a   beautiful   oration   without   [adopting]   the   rules   of   its   accents,  
pronunciations,   words   delivered   now   quickly   or   slowly,   some   softly,   some   loudly,   the  
effect  will  not  move  the  listeners.  It  must  be  the  same  in  Music  because  if  the  orator  is  to  
move  the  listeners  with  the  abovementioned  rules,  so  much  better  the  Music  recited  with  
34
WKHVDPHUXOHVDFFRPSDQLHGE\ZHOORUGHUHGKDUPRQ\LWZLOOEHIDUPRUHHIIHFWLYH´  
 
  Gioseffo  Zarlino,  in  his  Sopplimenti  Musicali  of  1588,  goes  even  further,  making  it  clear  
that  there  is  a  difference  between  the  two  kinds  of  repertory²written  song  and  improvised  song.  
According   to   Zarlino,   the   extremes   of   rhetorical   practices   are   to   be   applied   only   when  
performing   in   the   improvised   style,   but   they   can   only   be   used   in   moderation   when   singing  
composed   songV,W LV LQWHUHVWLQJWRRWKDWKH PDNHVDFOHDUGLVWLQFWLRQ EHWZHHQ ³DVLQJHUZKHQ
VLQJLQJ´DQG³DVLQJHUZKHQUHFLWLQJ´ 35  
 
    ³Therefore,  just  as  it  is  allowed  that  in  reciting,  according  to  the  material  that  he  
draws  upon,  an  Orator  sometimes  does  not  just  speak,  but  when  he  would  wish  to  convey  
fear   and   terror   he   explains   his   concept   with   a   loud   and   horrible   voice,   yelling   and  
exclaiming;;  and  when  he  wishes  to  provoke   commiseration  [he  speaks]   with  a  subdued  
and  lowered  voice.  Thus  is  it  not  inappropriate  to  a  musician  to  use  similar  devices²high  
and   low,   now   loud   and   now   subdued,   when   reciting   his   compositions?   Our   scholars  
perhaps   would   say,   that   it   is   one   thing  to   sing  and   another  to   orate   or   to  harangue,  and  
that  it  is  not  good  for  a  Musician  when  singing  to  adopt  these  devices  that  an  Orator  uses  
in  his  Orations.  Very  well,  I  too  have  said  as  much  above:  I  do  not  say  that  a  singer  while  
singing   should   yell   or   roar,   because   such   a   thing   would   have   neither   proportion   nor  
dignity,   but  I  say  that  it  is  allowed  to  him  [when  he  functions]  as  a  reciter,  in  that  case  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
Tomasi  (Trento:  Comune  di  Trento,  1996),  9-­DQG,PRJHQH+RUVOH\³,PSURYLVDWLRQ,,:HVWHUQ$UW0XVLF´LQ
The  New  Grove  Dictionary  (London:  MacMillan,  Publishers,  1980),  XII:99.  
 
Nicola  Vicentino,    /¶DQWLFDPXVLFDULGRWWDDOODPRGHUQDSUDWWLFD³/DHVSHULHQ]DGHOO¶2UDWRUHO¶LQVHJQD
FKH VL YHGH LO PRGR FKH WLHQH QHOO¶2UDWLRQH FKH KRUD GLFH IRUWH  KRUD SLDQR  SL WDrdo,   &   più   presto,   e   con  
TXHVWRPXRYHDVVDLJO¶RGLWRUL TXHVWRPRGRGLPXRYHUHODPLVXUDIjHIIHWWRDVVDLQHOO¶DQLPR SHUWDOUDJLRQHVL
FDQWHUjOD 0XVLFDDOODPHQWH SHULPLWDU JOLDFFHQWL  HIHWWL GHOOH SDUWL GHOO¶RUDWLRQH  FKH HIIHWWR IDULD O¶2UDtore  
FKHUHFLWDVVH XQD EHOOD RUDWLRQH VHQ]DO¶RUGLQH GH L VXRL DFFHQWL SURQXQWLH  PRWL YHORFL  WDUGL  FRQLO GLU
piano   IRUWHTXHOORQRQPXRYHULDJO¶RGLWRUL,OVLPLOHGqHVVHUHQHOOD0XVLFDSHUFKHVHO¶RUDWRUHPXRYHJOLRGLWRUL
FRQJO¶RUGLQLVRSUDGHWWLTXDQWRPDJJLRUPHQWHOD0XVLFDUHFLWDWDFRQLPHGHVLPLRUGLQLDFFRPSDJQDWLGDOO¶$UPRQLD
EHQXQLWDIDUjPROWRSLHIIHWWR´7UDQVODWLRQPLQH  
 
35
The  difficulty  of   finding  a  word  that  correctly  describes  the  oratorical-­based  singing  style  has  caused  enormous  
amounts  of  confusion,  usually  resulting  in  the  erroneous  translation  of  the  Italian  word   recitare  DV³UHFLWH´²speak.    
Instead,   it   should   be   translated   in   some   way   to   reflect   that   it   is   a   chant-­like   musical   rendering,   later   adopted   in  
operatic   peUIRUPDQFH DV ³UHFLWDWLYR´ 6HH GLVFXVVLRQ RI WKLV SRLQW LQ 7LPRWK\ - 0F*HH ³'LQQHU 0XVLF IRU WKH
Florentine  Signoria  1350-­´Speculum  74  (1999):  95-­114,  at  96-­8.  
 
  12  

ZKDWHYHULVDOORZHGWRDUHFLWHURI7UDJHG\DQG&RPHG\«WKXVLIWKHUHFLWHULVSHUPLWWHG
these  things  for  the  enjoyment  of  his  listeners,  so  must  the  singer  be  allowed  to  use  some  
36
of  them  in  singing´  
 
  What   is   being   discussed   by   both   writers   is   the   insertion   of   dramatic   elements   into   an  
oration   in   order   to   underline   the   emotion   of   the   text²that   is,   its   affect²and   that   the   singer  
should   choose   from   these   same   techniques   for   the   same   purpose;;   exactly   what   Caccini   was  
describing   in   his   statement   about   understanding   affect   and   variety   of   affect. 37   =DUOLQR¶V
distinction   between   the   recitativo   style   of   delivery   and   the   cantare   style   is   instructive   from   a  
number  of  points  of  view.    It  tells  us  that  a  dramatic  singing  style  was  well  established  prior  to  
any   sixteenth-­century   importation   from   Rome   and   Naples;;   that   it   was   closely   related   to   the  
dramatic  style  of  orators;;  and  that  well   before  Caccini  and  the   southern  dramatic  style  traveled  
north,   there   was   alreDG\ D FOHDU GLVWLQFWLRQ EHWZHHQ D ³VLQJLQJ´ VW\OH DQG D PRUH GUDPDWLF
³UHFLWLQJ´VW\OHDOWKRXJKWKHZULWHUVDJUHHWKDW³VLQJLQJ´VKRXOGLQFOXGHLQPRGHUDWLRQVRPHRI
the  dramatic  ingredients  of  the  other.38  That  these  dramatic,  oratorical  elements  were  present  in  
the   Roman   reciting   style   in   the   late   fifteenth   century   is   recorded   in   a   1489   letter   from   Angelo  
3ROL]LDQR WR 3LFR GHOOD 0LUDQGROD GHVFULELQJ D SHUIRUPDQFH E\ )DELR 2UVLQL DW KLV IDWKHU¶V
palace  in  Rome:  
 
    ³+H ILOOHG RXU HDUV RU UDWKHU RXU KHDUWV ZLWK D YRLFH VR VZHHW WKDW«, ZDV
DOPRVW WUDQVSRUWHG RXW RI P\ VHQVHV« +LV YRLFH ZDV QRW HQWLUHO\ WKDW RI VRPHRQH
reading,   nor   entirely   that   of   someone   singing:     both   could   be   heard,   and   yet   neither  

                                                                                               
36
Gioseffo   Zarlino,   Sopplimenti   Musicali 9HQLFH  ³3HUFLRFKH VL FRPH DOO¶2UDWRUH nel   recitar   è   concesso,  
secondo   le   materie   che   tratta   tallora,   non   dirò   palare;;   ma   con   alta   voce   &   horribile,   gridando   &   esclamando,  
esprimere  il  suo  concetto;;  &  questo  quando  parla  di  cose,  con  lequali  egli  voglia  indur  spavento  &  terrore;;  &  tallor  
con  voFHVRPPHVVD EDVVDTXDQGRYXROHLQGXUFRPPLVHUDWLRQHFRVLQRQqFRVDGLVFRQYHQHYROHDO0XVLFRG¶XVDU
VLPLOL DWJWLRQL QHOO¶DFXWR  QHO JUDYH KRUD FRQ YRFH DOWD  KRUD FRQ YRFH VRPPHVVD UHFLWDQGR OH VXH
Compositioni.    Dirrano  forse  questi  nostri  SapiHQWLFK¶DOWUDFRVDqLO&DQWDUH DOWUDqO¶2UDUHz5LQJDUH FKHQRQ
VWjEHQHDO0XVLFRQHOFDQWDUHFK¶HLXVLTXHLPRGLFKHXVDO¶2UDWRUHQHOODVXDVXD2UDWLRQH6WjEHQHTXHVWRKz
GHWWRDQFK¶LRGLVRSUDRQGHQRQGLFRFKH¶O&DQWRUHFDQWDQGRGHEEDQe  gridare,  ne  far  strepito:  percioche  non  è  cosa  
KDEELDQHSURSRUWLRQHQHGHFRURPDGLFRFKHjOXLqFRQFHVVRFRPHUHFLWDWRUHLQTXHOO¶DWWRTXHOORFKHVLFRQFHGHj
L5HFLWDWRULGHOOH7UDJHGLH &RPHGLH«FRVLVHTXHVWRVLSHUPHWWHDO5HFLWDQWHSHULOFommodo  de  gli  Ascoltanti;;  si  
SHUPHWWHUjDQFRDO&DQWRUHDOFXQHDWWLRQLQHO&DQWDUH´7UDQVODWLRQPLQH  
 
37
$ FRPSDULVRQ RI PXVLFDO SHUIRUPDQFH ZLWK RUDWLRQDOVR DSSHDUVDV &RXQW %DUGL¶V SDUW RI WKH GLDORJXH LQ ZKDW
Claude  Palisca  considered  to  be  the  most  influential  music  treatise  of  the  period,  see  Vincenzo  Galilei,  Dialogue  on  
Ancient   and   Modern   Music,   trans.   Claude   V.   Palisca   (New   Haven:   Yale   2003),   350-­1.     Michael   Praetorius   also  
discusses  the  Italian  singing  style  in  terms  of  oration,  and  continues  on  to  cite  the  publications  of  Giulio  Caccini  and  
Giovanni  Battista  Bovicelli;;  see  the  quote  in  MacClintock,  Readings,  163-­70.
 
38
Mersenne,  in  his  Harmonie  universelle,  also  associates  the  dramatic  style  of  singing  with  oration.  See  translation  
in  MacClintock,  Readings,  163-­70.  
 
  13  

separated   one   from   the   other;;   it   was,   in   any   case,   even   or   modulated,   and   changed   as  
required   by   the   passage.     Now   it   was   varied,   now   sustained,   now   exalted   and   now  
restrained,   now   calm   and   now   vehement,   now   slowing   down   and   now   quickening   its  
pace,  but  always  it  was  precise,  always  clear  and  always  pleasant;;  and  his  gestures  were  
39
QRWLQGLIIHUHQWRUVOXJJLVKEXWQRWSRVWXULQJRUDIIHFWHGHLWKHU´  
 
  Given  the  long  history  and  widespread  popularity  of  the  FDQWDUHDOO¶LPSURYYLVR  tradition  
and   its   relationship   to   oration   techniques,   it   can   be   seen   that   a   model   for   dramatic   singing  
performance   had   long   been   established   throughout   Italy.   Its   continuing   popularity   into   the  
seventeenth  century  can  be  seen  in  the  duel  between  Francesca  Caccini  and  Adriana  Basile  who  
were  improvising  music  to  poetry,  and  although  Adriana  was  judged  to  have  the  superior  voice,  
it  was  Francesca  who  was  better  at  representing  the  particular  affects  of  the  poem.  
 
  Since  we  are  aware  of  the  steady  exchange  of  singers  among  the  most  prominent  northern  
courts   and   both   Rome   and   Naples,   we   might   wRQGHU ZKDW UHDOO\ ZDV &DFFLQL¶V FODLP WR
performance  fame;;  what  was  it  that  he  incorporated  into  his  performances  that  garnered  so  much  
praise  for  himself  and  his  students.40  7KURXJKRXWPXFKRIWKLVGLVFXVVLRQ,KDYHWUHDWHG&DFFLQL¶V
style  and  the  Neapolitan/Roman  recitative  style  as  more  or  less  the  same,  but  this  certainly  was  
not   entirely   true.   While   the   basic   dramatic   elements   appear   to   have   been   the   same,   Caccini  
undoubtedly   developed   a   very   singular   style   which   was   different   enough   from   the   southern  
tUDGLWLRQ WKDW LQ  WZR RI &DUGLQDO 0RQWDOWR¶V VLQJHUV ,SROLWD 5HFXSLWR DQG 0HOFKLRU
Palontrotti,  were  sent  from  Rome  to  Florence  for  three  months  to  study  the  recitative  style  with  
Caccini. 41    Apparently  what  they  wanted  to  learn  was  neither  a  part  of  their  previous  training  nor  
available   in   Rome   at   the   time.   And   if   we   recall   that   Caccini   also   was   credited   with   teaching  
Vittoria  Archilei  as  well  as  other  prominent  Roman-­trained  singers,  it  is  clear  that  his  style  must  
have  differed  from  the  southern  monodic  style  in  significant  details. 42  
 
  ,I ZH WDNH RXU FXH IURP &DFFLQL¶V SXEOLFDWLRQV WZR HOHPHQWV VHHP WR EH HPSKDVL]HG
                                                                                               
39
Nino   Pirrotta   and  Elena   Povoledo,   Li   due   Orfei:   da   Poliziano   a   Monteverdi   (Torino:   Edizioni   RAI,   1969),   46;;  
English   translation   by   Karen   Hales,   Music   and   Theatre   from   Poliziano   to   Monteverdi   (Cambridge:   Cambridge  
University  Press,  1982),  36.    I  am  indebted  to  Allan  Atlas  for  passing  on  this  reference.  
 
40
6HH7LP&DUWHU¶VTXHVWLRQDVWR³WKHH[WHQWWRZKLFK&DFFLQL¶VVW\OHGHSDUWVIURPHVWDEOLVKHGSUDFWLFH´ LQ³2Q
WKH&RPSRVLWLRQDQG3HUIRUPDQFHRI&DFFLQL¶V/HQXRYHPXVLFKH  ´Early  Music  12,  (1984):  209;;  reprinted  in  
Carter,  Monteverdi  and  his  Contemporaries,  Variorum  collected  studies  series  (Burlington:  Ashgate,  2000).
 
41
See  Tim  Carter,  ³$)ORUHQWLQH:HGGLQJRI´Acta  musicologica  55  (1983):  101.  
 
42
Although  it  would  not  seem  to  be  a  factor  with  reference  to  the  singers  named  here,  John  Walter  Hill  points  out  
that  many  of  the  Roman  singers  trained  in  the  monodic  style  could  not  read  music,  whereas  those  who  could  read,  
ZHUH WUDLQHG LQ WKH SRO\SKRQLF WUDGLWLRQ ³7UDLQLQJ D 6LQger   for   Musica   Recitativa   in   Early   Seventeenth-­Century  
,WDO\ WKH &DVH RI %DOGDVVDUH´ Musicologia   humana:   Studies   in   honor   of   Warren   and   Ursula   Kirkendale,   eds.  
Siegried  Gmeinwieser,  David  Hiley  and  Jörg  Riedlbaur  (Florence:  L.S.  Olschki,  1994),  345-­57.  
  14  

first  of  all,  there  are  the  written-­out  irregular  rhythmic  patterns:  the  jagged,  stuttering,  emotional  
rhythms   that   he   directs   the   singers   to   execute   exactly   as   written   and   which,   if   coupled   with  
appropriate   oratorical   devices,   would   have   a   very   dramatic   effect.     And   the   second   element   is  
sprezzatura,   described   as   sudden   activity,   a   basic   element   in   oratorical   delivery   that   also   was  
present   in   the   FDQWDUH DOO¶LPSURYYLVR   tradition,   and   which   Caccini   claims   to   have   adopted   into  
his   performances.   In   fact,   Giustiniani   tells   us   this   in   his   Discorso   when   he   describes   the   style  
XVHG LQ 5RPDQ UHSUHVHQWDWLRQV DV ³UHFLWDWLYH´ DQG FUHGLWV &DFFLQL DV   one   of   the   singers   who  
³ZHUHDOPRVWWKHLQYHQWRUVRIWKHVW\OH´ 43  &DFFLQL¶VVW\OHFDQEHGHVFULEHGDVRQHEDVHGRQWKH
dramatic  monodic  style  of  Naples  and  Rome,  combined  with  other  recitative  elements  present  in  
the  cantare  DOO¶LPSURYYLVR  tradition  and  the  dramatic  devices  present  in  rhetorical  oration.    From  
all  accounts,  it  must  have  been  a  highly  ornate  and  emotional  delivery.    
 
  At   the   end   of   the   sixteenth   century,   therefore,   there   were   two   separate   styles   of  
ornamentation,  which  I  would  like  to  refer  to  as  passaggi  and  dramatic  delivery.  Passaggi,  which  
DOVR LQFOXGHG JUDFHV ZDV SUDFWLFHG LQ ZKDW WKH WKHRULVWV UHIHUUHG WR DV WKH ³VLQJLQJ´ VW\OH
PHDQLQJ PXVLF , GHVFULEHG HDUOLHU DV ³UHJXODU´ LQ LWV FRQVWUXFWLRQ  7KH GUDPDWLF VW\OH ZDV
practiced  in  monody  where  the  irregular  pace  and  construction  would  allow  application  of  some  
of  the  techniques  of  oration.    To  complicate   matters,  the   monodic,  dramatic  style  also   included  
passaggi  and  graces,  and  there  is  evidence  that  some  of  the  elements  of  the  dramatic  style  were  
WUDQVIHUUHGWRWKH³VLQJLQJ´VW\OHDVZHOOLQFOXGLQJHQVHPEOHSHUIRUPDQFH  
   
  As  for  how  the  two  styles  of  ornamentation  were  learned,  we  have  direct  statements  that  
both  could  be  learned  without  a  teacher:  the  passaggi  instruction  manuals  claim  that  all  that  the  
singers  and   instrumentalists   needed  to  do  was  to  methodically  practice  and   memorize  the  riffs,  
ZKLFKFRXOGWKHQEHWUDQVIHUUHGWRDQ\WKLQJWKH\ZHUHSHUIRUPLQJDQGDOWKRXJKWKH\GLGQ¶WJLYH
similar  exercises  for  learning  graces,  those  ornaments  were  described  very  generally  in  prose  and  
VDLGWREHHDVLO\ LQVHUWHG$QGRIFRXUVHZH KDYH&DFFLQL¶VVWDWHPHQWWKDWE\ PHUHO\REH\LQJ
exactly   what   he   had   written   in   his   two   publications   and   recalling   oration   techniques,   a   singer  
would   haYH HYHU\WKLQJ QHFHVVDU\WRUHSURGXFHWKDWVW\OH2I KLV ³WKUHHHVVHQWLDO HOHPHQWV´ IRU
graceful  performance,  affect,  and  variety  of  affect  probably  could  be  adopted  from  a  knowledge  
of  oratorical  practices,  but  there  is  no  mention  of  how  anyone  could  learn  sprezzatura.  
   
  There   is   substantial   reason   for   us   to   seriously   doubt   some   of   the   printed   claims   about  
learning   ornamentation   without   a  teacher²HVSHFLDOO\ ZLWK UHIHUHQFH WR &DFFLQL¶V VW\OH  *LYHQ
the   non-­specific   nature   of   the   passaggi-­type   ornamentation,   it   is   definitely   possible   that  
instrumentalists   could   have   learned   quite   a   bit   from   the   manuals;;   it   is   probable   that   the  
memorized  riff  approach  was  exactly  what  would  have  been  learned  from  a  teacher.  But  however  
easy   this   might   have   been   for   instrumentalists,   it   is   clear   that   not   all   singers   were   capable   of  
spontaneously   inventing  their  own  ornamentation.    Even  the   highly  praised  and   highly  talented  
members   of   the   concerto   delle   donne   of   Ferrara   who   sang   from   memory,   had   all   of   their  
                                                                                               
43
Giustiniani,  Discorso,  trans.  MacClintock,  77.
 
  15  

ornaments  written  out,  a  fact  reported  in  a  1584  letter  from  Alessandro  Striggio. 44    (Presumably  
these   were   mostly   passaggi-­type,   although   they   undoubtedly   also   included   some   of   the   new  
GUDPDWLFRUQDPHQWVWKDWWKH\KDGOHDUQHGIURP&DFFLQL¶VILUVWYLVLWDIHZPRQWKVHDUOLHU)  This  is  
supported   by   the   quote   above   from   Giustiniani   that   Luzzaschi   and   Wert   were   writing   out  
ornaments   for   the   donne   in   both   Ferrara   and   Mantua.     And   as   positive   as   were   some   of   the  
authors  of  the  various  manuals  as  to  the  ease  of  learning  ornamentation  from  their  publications,  
even  Marin  Mersenne,  while  promoting  his  book  as  a  source  of  learning  ornamentation,  admitted  
that  the  trillo  could  not  be  learned  without  a  teacher.45    
 
  There  is  no  doubt  that  for  singers  certain  elements  could  be  transferred  from  rhetoric,  and  
that  the  ubiquitous  examples  of  the  FDQWDUHDOO¶LPSURYYLVR  singers  in  the  piazzas  would  also  have  
provided  models  for  the  irregularity  of  recitative  delivery.  But  it  would  certainly  seem  unrealistic  
to  think  that  one  could  develop  an  understanding  of  how  to  transfer  these  rhetorical  models  to  a  
specific  song  without  a  long  period  of  training  with  an  expert  teacher.    It  would  even  have  been  
possible   for   a   singer   to   independently   learn   the   individual   dramatic   techniques   associated   with  
this   kind   of   delivery   as   well   as   the   other   vocal   ornaments,   but   to   associate   the   many   vocal  
nuances  correctly  with  the  appropriate  oratorical  gesture  in  recitative  ornamentation  would  have  
taken  long  hours  of  study  and  direct  contact  with  someone  who  knew  how  to  apply  them. 46    I  am  
inclined   to   agree   with   the   statement   of   Cesare   Marotta,   composer   for   Cardinal   Montalto   and  
husband  of  singer  Ippolita  Recupito,  who  explained  in  a  letter  of  1614  that  the  reason  he  taught  
singing   by   rote   was   that  there   were  too   many   elements   of   the   monodic   style   that   could   not   be  
notated.47    
 
      There  is  evidence  that  instrumentalists  also  ornamented  in  the  dramatic  style.  Francesco  
5RJQRQL LQ KLV PDQXDO RI  DGYRFDWHV WKDW LQVWUXPHQWDOLVWV DGRSW &DFFLQL¶V WHFKQLTXHV LQ
their  solo  playing,48  DOWKRXJKH[DFWO\KRZWKLVZDVGRQHLVGLIILFXOWWRXQGHUVWDQGVLQFH&DFFLQL¶V
ornamentations  were  intended  to  be  direct  expressions  of  the  text.    Nevertheless,  there  are  extant  
examples  of   instrumental  ornamentations   from  the  early  seventeenth  century  that  would  appear  
to  include  some  of  the  dramatic  gestures  discussed  above:  irregular  and  jagged  rhythms;;  sudden  
bursts   of   movement   that   just   as   suddenly   cease;;   a   style   quite   different   from   the   continuous-­
                                                                                               
44
Alessandro  Striggio  in  a  letter  of  29  July  1584.  ASF:  Mediceo  768,  fol.  44.  Published  in  Newcomb,  The  Madrigal  
as  document  57  and  translated  on  p.  54.        
 
45
Mersenne,  Harmonie  universelle,  translated  in  MacClintock,  Readings,  170.  
 
46
On   the   subject   of   rhetorical   gestures   in   English   lute   songs   and   their   performance   see   Robert   Toft,   Tune   Thy  
Musicke  To  Thy  Hart  (Toronto:  University  of  Toronto  Press,  1993).  
 
47
The  letter  is  reproduced  and  discussed  in  Hill,  Monody,  128-­9.  
 
48
6HH 6WHZDUW &DUWHU ³)UDQFHVFR 5RJQRQL¶V 6HOYD GL YDULL SDVVDJJL   )UHVK 'HWDLOV &RQFHUQLQJ (DUO\
%DURTXH9RFDO2UQDPHQWDWLRQ´Performance  Practice  Review  2  (1989):  5-­33.  
 
  16  

motion  passaggi.49    
 
     As   the   various   anecdotal   accounts   have   pointed   out,   and   in   direct   contradiction   of  
published   claims,   at   the   end   of   the   sixteenth   century   the   most   common   method   of   learning  
ornamentation  would  seem  to  have  been  contact  with  an  expert  teacher.  This  was  especially  true  
for  singers,  including  even  those  who  were  professionals,  could  read  music,  and  who  also  played  
instruments.    It  is  not  difficult  to  understand  why  this  was  so  for  the  dramatic  monodic  style  with  
its   complex   text-­related   affects,   but   surprisingly,   it   would   also   seem   to   have   been   true   for   the  
passaggi-­type   ornaments.   Singers   were   far   more   reliant   than   instrumentalists   on   external  
assistance  for  all  types  of  ornamentation.  For  instrumentalists  the  situation  appears  to  have  been  
somewhat   different,   with   self-­instruction   by   way   of   published   manuals   playing   a   much   larger  
role,  perhaps  because  of  the  predominance  of  the  passaggi  style  in  instrumental  ornamentation.    
   
  Throughout   the   sixteenth   century   and   on   into   the   seventeenth,   writers   continued   to  
criticize   the   excessive   use   of   both   styles   of   ornamentation,   complaining   bitterly   about   the  
meaningless  passaggi  that  obscured  the  melody  and/or  text,  as  well  as  the  distraction  of  overly  
dramatic  delivery,  but  the  argument  was  always  about  quantity;;  the  basic  idea  of  the  importance  
of   ornamentation   remained   intact.   A   singer   or   instrumentalist   who   wished   to   receive   the  
admiration  of  the  audience  knew  that  one  way  or  another,  expertise  in  ornamentation  had  to  be  
learned.      For  the  majority  of  them  that  meant  finding  an  expert  teacher.50    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

                                                                                               
49
Comparative   examples   of   these   can   be   found   in   Richard   Erig,   with   Vironika   Gutmann,   Italian   Diminutions  
(Zurich:  Amadeus  Press,  1979).  
 
50
A  version  of  this  paper  was  read  at  the  conference  Pedagogy  of  the  Renaissance  at  Johns  Hopkins  University  in  
June  2005.  

You might also like