Nutritional Assessment of Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Nutritional Assessment of Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Nutritional Assessment of Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
The occurrence of wasting among cancer patients is Children from developing countries are at risk for primary
determined by host susceptibility, tumor type and location, malnutrition. Children undergoing anticancer therapy are at
and anticancer regimen. The rational for identifying, treating, higher risk for secondary malnutrition, including obesity and
and preventing malnutrition among pediatric cancer patients growth retardation. Objective and subjective data should be
may be summarized as follows: Malnutrition is common used to complete the nutritional assessment. Different parts of
among patients with cancer both on presentation and with nutritional assessment include medical history; physical
subsequent antitumor therapy, weight loss, deficits in weight examination; biochemical and hematological data,
for height (wasting), and deficits in height for age (stunting) anthropometric measurements and food and nutrition history.
are observed [1]. There are no known disease processes where Malnutrition can lead to a decreased immune function, in
malnutrition is advantageous to the host. There is an increased already immune compromised patients; delay wound healing
morbidity from malnutrition in hospitalized patients, including and reduce drug metabolism. Also, as mentioned earlier it can
delayed wound healing, increased infectious complications, be a contributing factor to death and poor prognosis [1,8,9].
decreased immune competence, reduced respiratory and
Biochemical data: Serum proteins serum albumin became
other muscle strength, and increased length of stay. The
the gold standard for indicating nutritional status in patients.
nutrition literature in pediatrics confirm wasting as an
important risk factor for early death, Moreover, acute Blood glucose levels: Malnutrition can cause glucose
malnutrition is marked by depression and apathy, and chronic intolerance and impairment of insulin secretion
malnutrition by delayed neurodevelopment. All the
Lipid profile: A diet high in saturated fats and transfers can
morbidities named above are common in pediatric cancer
increase total cholesterol levels. Plant based diets high in fiber
patients [1]. Malnutrition in pediatric cancer patients has been
and unsaturated fatty acids can lower total cholesterol.
associated Within tolerance to chemotherapy [1].
Hemoglobin/Hematocrit in state of malnutrition, hemoglobin
Early recognition of patients at risk for malnutrition can and hematocrit tend to decrease because of inadequate
obviate the need for more aggressive supports subsequently in amount of protein consumption and possibly iron deficiency
the patients course [1]. [9].
Insufficient energy and nutrients intake (due to anorexia, Aims of the study: This prospective study was carried out to
taste changes, pain, nausea; adverse effect of cancer therapy, assess the nutritional status of children with acute
psychological problems), Pathologic alterations in nutrient lymphoblastic leukemia at time of diagnosis of disease, assess
metabolism (e.g. increase protein turnover, decrease muscle the nutritional status of the same children during induction of
protein synthesis, increase lipolysis, increase fatty acid chemotherapy and after induction by 3-6 weeks.
oxidation, increase hepatic glucose production, increase
hepatic protein synthesis, increase acute phase proteins)
[4], the side effects of the cancer treatment can also affect
Patients and Methods
dietary input by triggering nausea, vomiting and mucositis, ALL
patients take steroids during their treatment, this can cause an Patients
increase appetite and weight gain. This has been linked to the A prospective study has been carried out on children and
escalation of obesity in pediatric ALL survivors, which is four to adolescents with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic
five times more likely than expected, Leukemia and lymphoma leukemia over ten months (from the first of January till the end
patients can have an enlarged spleen, this effect on the of October -2010).
patient's stomach thus reducing their appetite [5]. Nutrition is
a supportive care modality that has associated with improved The data was collected from oncology pediatric ward in
tolerance to chemotherapy, improved survival, increased Basrah Maternity and Children Hospital. A total of 30 newly
quality of life, and decreased risk of infection in children diagnosed ALL patients, their ages range from 1-14 years were
undergoing anticancer therapy [6]. The goal of nutritional included in this study.
assessment in childhood is to prevent nutritional disorders and
the increased morbidity and mortality that accompany them. Data collection
Nutritional assessment is the quantitative evaluation of
nutritional status. A comprehensive nutritional assessment has A special questionnaire was designed for the study. The
five components: following information were taken: name, age, sex, date of
admission, diagnosis, and residence.
1. Growth, anthropometric and body composition
measurements. ALL classification according to:
<50,000/mm3 at time of presentation Immunophenotyping: The anthropometric indices were calculated by using
pro B ALL cell type. reference median as recommended by the National Centre for
Health Statistics (NCHS) (WHO) and classified according to
Morphological subtypes standard deviation units termed as Z score based on World
Health Organization (WHO) criterion. Children who were less
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia divided into 3 groups than 2standard deviations below the reference median (-2SD)
according to FAB classification: L1, L2, L3. This classification were considered as under-weight (weight for age), and wasted.
depends on size of nucleus, amount of cytoplasm, cytoplasm
basophilic and nuclear cytoplasm ratio [1]. Hematological and biochemical data
L1 comprises 85%of ALL in childhood while L2 comprises
Four milliliters of venous blood were withdrawn from each
14%, and L3 comprises 1%, the L1 morphology has been
patient. One milliliter was put in (EDTA) containing tube and
associated with higher remission rate and a better event free
send for Hb %.
survival (EFS) than L2 morphology which appears to convey
poor prognosis and patient with L3 have the worst over all The remaining 3 milliliters of blood were put in plain tube
prognoses [10]. without EDTA, centrifuged and send for: Random blood sugar
(RBS), total serum protein and serum albumin, Serum calcium
Clinical data and Serum Cholesterol.
Body mass index Table 2 shows past feeding history in early life include
breast, bottle and mixed feeding (breast and bottle feeding)
Body mass index (BMI) calculated by using norm gram based shows that nineteen patients with newly diagnosed ALL with
on {Weight (Kg)/Height (m)2}. BMI assess adiposity status.
© Copyright iMedPub 3
Archives in Cancer Research 2017
ISSN 2254-6081 Vol.5 No.1:128
breast feeding and ordinary diet. Seven patients with mixed during induction with chemotherapy and after induction. that
feeding and ordinary diet. the body weight increase during induction of chemotherapy
than before induction and statistically significant with P value
Table 2 Distribution of patients according to the type of of 0.045. Body mass index was increase during induction and
feeding. statistically significant with P value of 0.005. There is no
difference in MUAC in both groups and it is statistically not
Type of feeding Frequency % significant, P value of 0.083. There is no change in growth
Breastfeeding and ordinary diet 19 63.3% parameters during and after induction of chemotherapy by six
weeks.
Bottle feeding and ordinary diet 4 13.3%
ALL Risk No.30 Standard Risk (%) High Risk (%) Table 6 shows hemoglobin, total serum protein, serum
9 (30%) 21 (70%)
albumin, serum calcium, serum cholesterol and blood sugar
were assessed for all patients included in the study before,
ALL Morphology No. L1 (%) L2 (%) L3 (%) during and after induction and the result are that the Hb level
30
3 (10%) 25 (83.3%) 2 (6.6%) was significantly higher during induction than before induction
with P value of 0.000, also show that the serum calcium level
Table 4 shows nutritional indices of children with ALL were was decrease during induction with significant P value of
studied and present that half of the patients are underweight 0.001. Serum protein and albumin decrease during induction
at presentation and one third of the thirty newly diagnosed with significant P value of 0.000 and 0.005 respectively. Serum
patients are malnourished according to mid upper arm cholesterol was decrease during induction with significant P
circumference. value of 0.001. There was no statistical significant difference
between blood sugar before and during induction with P value
Tables 3-5 show thirty patients with newly diagnosed ALL of (0.771). There was no statistical significant difference
underwent somatometric measurement at initial presentation, between all the above indices during and after induction.
Indices No. 30 Before ٭induction During ٭induction P value During ٭induction After ٭induction P Value
Table 7 shows sixteen males from the total number (30) no significant relation between sex and body weight and body
patients and fourteen female were assessed for body mass index before and during induction of chemotherapy.
measurement before and during induction and the result was
Table 8 shows Hb and same biochemical investigations there is no significant relation between sex and hematological
(serum protein, serum cholesterol, serum calcium) were and biochemical data before and during induction.
studied in relation to sex before and during induction that
Table 6 Hematological and biochemical data before, during and after induction.
Indices Before During induction٭ P value During induction٭ After induction٭ P value
No.30 Induction*
Serum protein 6.7767 ± 0.9104 5.8167 ± .000 5.8167 ± 6.0033 ± 0.8202 0.06
0.7724 0.7724
Serum albumin 4.04 ± 0.91 3.55 ± 0.49 0.005 3.55 ± 0.49 3.68 ± 0.43 0.07
Table 8 Hematological and biochemical data in relation to sex before and during induction.
Serum protein 6.7813 ± 0.6685 6.7714 ± 1.1545 5.8687 ± 0.8700 5.7571 ± 0.6711 NS >0.05
Serum Calcium 2.2875 ± 0.2754 2.2286 ± 0.2525 2.0250 ± 0.3435 2.0357 ± 0.3225 NS >0.05
Table 9 shows nine patients with standard risk ALL and Table 10 shows no significant relation between risk group
21with high risk ALL their body weight and body mass index and hematological and biochemical data before and during
were evaluated before and during therapy no significant induction.
relation between body measurement and ALL risk group
Table 11 shows twenty-five patients belong to L2 subtype, 3
before and during therapy.
were L1 subtype, their weight and body mass index were
evaluated before and during induction in relation to
© Copyright iMedPub 5
Archives in Cancer Research 2017
ISSN 2254-6081 Vol.5 No.1:128
Table 9 Body measurement and risk group before and during induction.
ALL Risk Group. NO. Bodyweight٭ P value Body mass index٭ P Value
Before Standard Risk (9) 15.6889 ± 3.0937 0.249 14.2900 ± 1.7384 0.053
Therapy
High Risk (21) 20.1429 ± 11.2540 15.8376 ± 2.1216
During Standard Risk (9) 17.0778 ± 3.5113 0.371 15.5743 ± 2.1247 0.409
Therapy
High Risk (21) 20.4762 ± 10.9287 16.2881 ± 2.1019
Table 10 Hematological and biochemical data in relation to risk group before and during induction.
ALL Risk ٭Hb P value ٭Serum P value ٭Serum P value ٭Serum P value
Protein Calcium Cholesterol
Before Standard Risk 6.9556 ± 0.425 6.5222 ± 0.382 2.1444 ± 0.018 175.3333 ± 0.98
Therapy (9) 2.4790 0.7918 0.2128 33.0038
During Standard Risk 9.0778 ± 0.354 5.4556 ± 0.068 2.0778 ± 0.528 131.6667 ± 0.125
Therapy (9) 0.3528 0.8819 0.2333 23.8965
Table 11 Body measurement in relation to morphological subtypes before and during induction.
Table 12 shows hematological and biochemical data of prevent over nutrition which may in some instances be
patients with subgroups L1 and L2 were studied before and detrimental to the treatment of cancer [12-14].
during induction and the result revealed no significant relation
Children with cancer represent a high-risk group for protein
between morphological subtype and hematological and
energy malnutrition due to side effect associated with
biochemical data before and during chemotherapy.
treatment, mild to moderate malnutrition is common in
leukemia patients at diagnosis and relapse [15].
Discussion This prospective study was carried out on thirty patients
Nutritional assessment is the first step of nutritional support with newly diagnosed ALL. Of these thirty patients 15 (50%)
which will not improve the child's sense of well-being but also are underweight at presentation, while twelve (40%) are
maintain normal growth, promote wound healing, improve wasted at presentation. In this study 14 (46.7%) of the total 30
tumor response to therapy and enable the child to better newly diagnosed ALL are malnourished according to BMI
withstand the effects of therapy. Assessment will also help (BMI<5th centile), ten (33.3%) are malnourished according to
MUAC (MUAC<5th centile). A similar survey in India by Rajesh
6 This article is available from: http://www.acanceresearch.com/
Archives in Cancer Research 2017
ISSN 2254-6081 Vol.5 No.1:128
et al. was carried out on study group comprised 25 children shown that 21.2% of ALL patients evaluated had evidence of
with newly diagnosed ALL, their age range from (1-12) year, malnutrition, relatively less than Rajesh et al. and less than this
eighteen of them are male and seven are females [16]. In this study, which is explained by Delbecque –Boussard et al., as
Indian study show that there is 13 (52%) patients out of these there is low intake of energy, carbohydrate, and protein in case
25 newly diagnosed ALL were underweight at presentation, of ALL at time of diagnosis [18]. In the study by Tamminga et
twelve patients (48%) were wasted. Nine (36%) of them were al. observed that at the time of diagnosis, Wt, Ht, wt for ht and
malnourished according to MUAC [16]. Our study is mid arm circumference were normal in all patients with ALL in
comparable Rajesh et al. study [17]. Sgarberie et al., showed their study [19].
that 30% of affected children with ALL were wasted on
admission [2], while survey from Mexico by Delbecque et al.
Table 12 Hematological and biochemical data in relation to morphological subtypes before and during induction.
ALL Morphological ٭Hb P value *Serum P value *Serum P value *Serum P value
subtype No. Protein Calcium Cholesterol
Before L1 (3) 6.10 ± 1.93 0.707 7.50 ± 0.51 0.085 2.23 ± 0.25 0.857 192.6 ± 31.0 0.335
Therapy
L2 (25) 6.55 ± 1.96 6.63 ± 0.69 2.26 ± 0.27 170.8 ± 36.6
During L1 (3) 9.26 ± 0.46 0.941 6.33 ± 1.41 0.274 2.5 ± 0.45 0.08 168.6 ± 17.2 0.184
Therapy
L2 (25) 9.30 ± 0.79 5.80 ± 0.69 2.1 ± 0.26 143.4 ± 31.0
In this study changes in body parameters before and during body mass index during induction, this due to same effect of
induction show that there is overall increase in body weight steroid on body weight. In this study, there was no change in
during induction (mean increasing 0.6 kg), while Rajesh et al. all body parameters in comparison between during and after
show that there is overall increase in body weight of (0.3 kg) induction by 6 weeks. This may be due to short duration post
with a P value of (0.05) [17]. induction. Also, Delbecque et al. documented no change in
body composition during and after induction [18]. The most
There was a great effect of prednisolone during the weeks
presenting feature of children in this study at time of
of induction by increase food intake, which related to relieve
presentation was pallor, comprising 14 (46.6%) of the total
of symptoms and euphoria, over caring for children during
patients with mean Hb of (6.5 g/dl). Induction of
illness period and over introduction of best food by the
chemotherapy was not started unless stabilization of general
parents [16].
condition of the patients by supportive measure such as blood
Corticosteroid therapy causes alteration in fat metabolism, transfusion, platlate transfusion, treatment of infection, it is
which had a net effect of increase body fat and redistribution expected that Hb increases during induction. Similar result was
of body fat causing truncal obesity [16]. obtained by Carriottee et al. [13]. Serum calcium was
significantly decrease during induction. This is in agreement
In the current study one patient had severe weight loss
with a study by Chariotte [13] e t al. The explanation for this
during induction of chemotherapy. His body weight on
decrease due to effect of drug during induction such as steroid
admission was 27 kg, during induction his body weight was 22
(predinsolone induce calcium loss), antibiotics, prolonged
kg, he lost about 5 kg during induction. During induction, he
immobilization also induce calcium loss. In tumor lyses
was complaining from severe gastroenteritis with high grade
syndrome, there is hypercalciuria and loss of calcium in the
fever and severe oral mucositis which lead to decrease oral
urine result in hypocalcaemia [13].
intake and lead to weight loss. While in the study by Rajesh et
al. show that 9 cases have demonstrated loss of weight during The use of steroid and nephrotoxic agent may worsen
induction range from (0.2-5.8 kg). These patients had hypercalciuria putting the patient at high risk of osteopenia
complicated course during induction of chemotherapy such as and fractures [1].
(gastroenteritis, severe oral mucosities, bleeding, febrile
In this study, there was significant decrease in total serum
neutropenia, pneumonia and sepsis) which can lead to
protein and serum albumin during induction.
decrease oral intake and severe weight loss during induction
[17]. Similar result was obtained by Charriotte et al. The
explanation for that decrease due to effect of drugs that used
In this study, there is increase in mid upper arm
during induction such as L- Asparginase induce
circumference during induction by (0.3 cm) than before
hypoproteinemia, steroid induce protein muscle loss,
induction, although statistically not significant.
antibiotics decrease protein synthesis [13].
A study by Delbecque et al. also found no significant change
Albumin concentration decreases in acutely or chronically ill
in MUAC during induction [18], this may be due to large
patients because of the effects of inflammatory mediators on
amount of protein in diet. There was a significant increase in
hepatic protein synthesis. Severe liver and renal disease,
© Copyright iMedPub 7
Archives in Cancer Research 2017
ISSN 2254-6081 Vol.5 No.1:128
intravascular volume overload and zinc deficiency decrease insulin secretion and action. Malnutrition can cause glucose
serum albumin levels [19]. In cancer patients, there is intolerance and impairment of insulin secretion [1,12].
derangement of macronutrient metabolism such as the However, insulin resistance caused by disease or medication
presence of protein catabolism, hypoalbuminemia is common. used during treatment, including glucocorticiods and L-
An increase in muscle protein breakdown and decrease Asparginase is more common [21,22]. When hyperglycemia
skeletal muscle protein synthesis seems to be of primary occurs, synthesis of very low density lipoprotein is driven up,
importance. A net loss of skeletal muscle protein is a common and both triglyceride and cholesterol level rise (19). According
finding with malignancy and is particularly problematic in the to changes in hematological and biochemical data during and
growing child. Furthermore, there is disturbance of whole after induction, there is no significant change in any one of
protein homeostasis with net catabolism, negative nitrogen these data. In this study, there is no significant association
balance, increase in blood urea nitrogen, and fall in serum exists between body measurement and hematological and
albumin [1]. biochemical data in relation to sex, ALL risk group, ALL
morphological subtypes.
There is clinical impression that cancer patients especially
when undergoing chemotherapy, ingest lower amount of
nutrient than age based standard, these dietary changes Conclusion
therefore place them at risk of negative energy balance [1].
Malnutrition exists in a significant proportion of children
Another important reason for decreased nutrient intake is with acute lymphoblastic leukemia so adequate nutrition is an
anorexia and other gastrointestinal side effects of important in such children, to ensure optimal treatment.
chemotherapy. Mucosal damage is generally dose related, with
increased risk of mucosal toxicity with high dose induction
therapy, escalating dose pattern and combination
References
chemotherapy treatment [1]. 1. Bechard LJ, Adiv OE, Jaksic T, Duggan C (2006) Nutritional
supportive care. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG (eds). Principles and
High dose chemotherapy often produce painful mucositis
practice of pediatric oncology. (5thedn). Philadelphia, Lippincott
that can reduce nutritional intake for days to weeks. Other William and Wilkins 1330-1338.
gastrointestinal side effects of cancer treatment include
esophagitis, enteritis with malabsorption and diarrhea. Taste 2. Sgarberie UR, Fisberg M, Tone LG (2006) Nutritional assessment
and serum zinc and copper concentration among children with
perception has also shown to be altered in cancer patients
acute lymphocytic leukemia: a longitudinal study. Sao Paulo
receiving chemotherapy, with an increasing sensitivity to bitter Med J 124: 316-320.
taste; this phenomenon may lead to decrease food intake, and
may make the use of oral supplement difficult [1]. In this study, 3. Cornelio U, Attilio R, Massimo B, Anna B, Simona S, et al. (1996)
Nutritional status in untreated children with acute leukemia as
there is a significant decrease in serum cholesterol during
compared with children without malignancy. Journal of Pediatric
induction than before induction. Nutrition can significantly Gastroenterology Nutrition 23: 34-37.
improve or worsen a person's lipid profile. A diet high in
saturated fat and can increase total cholesterol level. Plant 4. Muller A, Zurcher G (2008) Malnutrition in cancer patients. In:
Berger DP, Engelhardt M, Hen BH, Mertelsmann B (eds). Concise
based diet high in fiber and unsaturated fatty acids can lower
Manual of Hematology and Oncology 225.
total cholesterol level [19].
5. Holmes S (2002) Nutrition and cancer. Cancer Nursing Practice
During induction of chemotherapy there is decrease 1: 31-38.
nutrient intake by the patients due to causes that mention
6. Iadas EJ, Sacks N, Meacham L, Henry D, Enriguez L, et al. (2005)
above such as anorexia, gastrointestinal side effect of A multidisciplinary review of nutritional considerations in the
chemotherapy (oral mucositis, gastroenteritis, and pediatric oncology population. Nutr Clin pract 20: 377-393.
malabsorption [19].
7. Phillips SM, Jensen G, Motil KJ, Hoppin GA (2010) Indication for
Other study shows increase serum cholesterol during nutritional assessment in childhood. 25: 379.
induction due to effect of drug such as L-Asparginase induce 8. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/indications-for-nutritional-
hypertriglyceridemia [1]. assessment-in-childhood
Treatment with chemotherapy is associated with decrease 9. Mosby TT, Barr RD, Pencharz PB (2009) Nutritional assessment
fat utilization in children newly diagnosed with ALL [1]. of children with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 26: 179-186.
In cases of protein energy malnutrition, patients experience 10. Yaris N, Akyus C, Coskun T, Kutluk T, Buyukpamukcu M (2002)
an increase in plasma total triacylglycerol concentration, a Nutritional status of children with cancer and its effect on
survival. Turk J Pediater. 44: 35.
measure of fat stored in the body and decreased high density
lipoprotein concentration. This caused by reduction in the 11. Zalina AZ, Shahar S, Jamal RA, Aini N (2009) Assessing the
activity of lipoprotein lipase [20]. nutritional status of children with leukemia from hospitals in
Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia Journal Nutrition 15: 45– 51.
According to random blood sugar, in this study there is
increase in blood sugar during induction with no significant P 12. Keane V (2007) Assessment of Growth. In: Kliegman RM,
Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF (eds) Nelson Text Book of
value. In cancer patients who are malnourished, increase Pediatrics (18thedn) 71-73.
glucose production occurs and there are abnormalities with
13. Charriotte GN, Derrick BJ, Alfred JZ (1982) Nutritional 19. Tamminga RY, Kamps WA, Drager NM, Himphery GB (1992)
assessment of the child with cancer. Cancer Research (Suppl) Los Longitudinal anthropometric study in children with ALL. Acta
Angeles, California: UCLA school of public health and medicine Pediater Scand 8: 61-65.
42: 699-712.
20. Mosby TT, Barr RD, Pencharz PB (2009) Nutritional assessment
14. Pesce MA (2007) Laboratory testing in infants and children. In: of children with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 26: 179-186.
Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF (eds) Nelson
Text Book of Pediatrics (18thedn) 2: 2945-2949.
21. Vlassara H, Spiegel RJ, Doval DS, Cerami A (1986) Reduced
plasma lipo-protein lipase activity in patients with malignancy
15. National cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) (1992) NCEP associated weight loss. Hormone and Metabolic Research 18:
Expert Panel on blood cholesterol levels in children and 698-703.
adolescent. Highlight of the report. Pediatrics 89-495.
22. Robertson JR, Sparker HL, Shelso J, Zhou Y, Mtzker ML, et al.
16. Yu LC, Kuvibidila S, Ducos R, Warrier RP (1997) Nutritional status (2008) Clinical consequences of hyperglycemia during remission
of children with leukemia. Med Pediatr Oncol 28: 321-322. induction therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Leukemia 23: 245-250.
17. Kumar R, Marwaha RK, Bhalla AK, Gulati M (2000) Protein
energy malnutrition and skeletal muscle wasting in childhood
ALL. Indian pediatric 73: 720- 726.
18. Delbecque-Boussared L, Frederia G, Simon A, Brigitte N,
Francoise M, et al. (1997) Nutritional status of children with ALL:
A longitudinal study. AM J Clin Nutr 65: 95-100.
© Copyright iMedPub 9