Gaap Vs Ifrs
Gaap Vs Ifrs
Gaap Vs Ifrs
More than 100 countries around the world have adopted IFRS, which aim to establish a common
global language for company accounting affairs. While the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) has openly expressed a desire to switch from GAAP to IFRS, development has been slow.
GAAP
If a company distributes its financial statements outside of the company, GAAP must be
followed. If a corporation's stock is publicly traded, financial statements must also adhere to
rules established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
GAAP addresses such things as revenue recognition, balance sheet, item classification, and
outstanding share measurements. If a financial statement is not prepared using GAAP, investors
should be cautious. Also, some companies may use both GAAP- and non-GAAP-compliant
measures when reporting financial results. GAAP regulations require that non-GAAP measures
are identified in financial statements and other public disclosures, such as press releases.
IFRS
The point of IFRS is to maintain stability and transparency throughout the financial world. IFRS
enables the ability to see exactly what has been happening with a company and allows businesses
and individual investors to make educated financial decisions.
IFRS is standard in the European Union (EU) and many countries in Asia and South America,
but not in the United States. The Securities and Exchange Commission won't switch to
International Financial Reporting Standards in the near term, but will continue reviewing a
proposal to allow IFRS information to supplement U.S. financial filings. Countries that benefit
the most from the standards are those that conduct a lot of international business and investing.
Key Differences
The primary difference between the two systems is that GAAP is rules-based and IFRS
is principles-based. This disconnect manifests itself in specific details and interpretations.
Basically, IFRS guidelines provide much less overall detail than GAAP. Consequently, the
theoretical framework and principles of the IFRS leave more room for interpretation and may
often require lengthy disclosures on financial statements. On the other hand, the consistent and
intuitive principles of IFRS are more logically sound and may possibly better represent the
economics of business transactions.
Perhaps the most notable specific difference between GAAP and IFRS involves their treatment
of inventory. IFRS rules ban the use of last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory accounting methods.
GAAP rules allow for LIFO. Both systems allow for the first-in, first-out method (FIFO) and the
weighted average-cost method. GAAP does not allow for inventory reversals, while IFRS
permits them under certain conditions.
Another key difference is that GAAP requires financial statements to include a statement
of comprehensive income. IFRS does not consider comprehensive income to be a major element
of performance and therefore does not require it. This difference leaves some room for mixing
owner and non-owner activity within IFRS-based financial statements.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
GAAP is a common set of accepted accounting principles, standards, and procedures that
companies and their accountants must follow when they compile their financial statements.
IFRS is a set of international accounting standards, which state how particular types of
transactions and other events should be reported in financial statements.
Some accountants consider methodology to be the primary difference between the two
systems; GAAP is rules-based and IFRS is principles-based.