Widening & Strengthening Of: Nh-26 in The State of Odisha

PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION & DESIGN REPORT
E X E C U T I V E E N G I N E E R , N A T I O N A L H I G H W A Y D I V I S I O N , K E S I N G A.
WIDENING & STRENGTHENING OF

NH–26 IN THE STATE OF ODISHA
TWO LANE CARRIAGE WAY WITH PAVED SHOULDER
130/280 KM
142/620 KM
159/280 KM
175/880 KM
CLIENT
PWD
GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA
DESIGN CONSULTANT REVISION -1 EPC CONTRACTOR
ARCONS - DDB (JV)

CONTENTS
S.NO. PARTICULARS PAGE
1.0 PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION AND CONDITION SURVEY...................................................................................................................

1
1.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................................................1
1.2 THE PROJECT CORRIDOR......................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 CARRIAGE WAY.............................................................................................................................................................................. 1
1.4 TERRAIN..................................................................................................................................................................................................1
2.0 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY............................................................................................................................................. 1

2.1 VISUALLY OBSERVED DISTRESSES...................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 INVESTIGATION DETAILS OF EXISTING CRUST…………………………………………………………………………………7
2.3 TEST RESULTS OF SUBGRADE SAMPLES ………………………………………………………………………. 9
2.4 DEFLECTION SURVEY BY BENKELMAN BEAM ……………………………………………………………………. 11
3.0 MATERIAL SOURCE ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................................ 14

3.1 COARSE AGGREGATES................................................................................................................................................................ 15
3.2 FINE AGGREGATES.................................................................................................................................................................... 15
3.3 BORROW SOIL………………….............................................................................................................................................................
16
3.4 STEEL…………………..................................................................................................................................................................... 16
3.5 CEMENT…………………................................................................................................................................................................. 16
3.6 BITUMEN………………….......................................................................................................................................................................
16
4.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN.................................................................................................................................................................. 17

4.1 PAVEMENT TYPE....................................................................................................................................................................... 17
4.2 TRAFFIC INTENSITY.................................................................................................................................................................. 17
4.3 RAINFALL INTENSITY................................................................................................................................................................ 17
4.4 INVESTIGATION OF EXISTING SUB GRADE SOIL...............................................................................................................18
4.5 STRENGTHENING OF THE PROJECT CORRIDOR..................................................................................................... 18
A PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY..................................................................................................................................... 18
B DESIGN STANDARDS............................................................................................................................................................... 19
C PAVEMENT DESIGN PHILOSOPHY..................................................................................................................................... 19
ARCONS - DDB (JV)

CONTENTS
D OBJECTIVE...................................................................................................................................................................................... 19
E DESIGN PARAMETERS (FOR BBD SURVEY).............................................................................................................................
20
F RESULT SUMMARY FOR OVERLAY CRUST…………………………………………………………………………………. 20
4.6 RECONSTRUCTION AND WIDENING OF THE PROJECT CORRIDOR…………………………………………………………….
A ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF EXISTING SUB GRADE SOIL ..........................................................................................................
21
B DESIGN CBR…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23
4.7 DETAIL OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT CRUST ....................................................................................................................................
24
4.8 REST AREA.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 24
ANNEXURE-I…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 25
ANNEXURE-II…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 37
ANNEXURE-III…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IN
ARCONS - DDB (JV)

WIDENING & STRENGTHENING OF
NH–26 IN THE STATE OF ODISHA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.0 G E N E R A L F E A T U R E S O F T H E P R O J E C T
1.1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
The National Highway Division Kesinga (P.W.D., Government of Odisha) as part of their leading efforts in roads
infrastructure, has identified the very important stretch of the NH-26 from Km 130/280 to 142/620 & Km.
159/280 to 175/880 including Geometric Improvment.
The project is decided to get execute with the Engineering, Procurement and Construction Contract by the
authority. The ARCONS-D.D.B. (JV) has been successfully excelling in execution of related project works. After
winning through competitive bidding process, the work is awarded to ARCONS-D.D.B. (JV), Bhubaneswar, Odisha.
1.2. T H E P R O J E C T C O R R I D O R
This section of the report presents the various details of components of the project based on the preliminary
information gathered for the project corridor. The National Highway-26 connects Baragarh – Bolangir –
Bhawanipatna –Nabarangpur – Borigumma – Jeypore – Koraput - Sunki. The two/intermediate lane stretches of
project road is from 130.280 km to 142.620 km(i.e 12.34 km long) and 159.280 km to 175.880 km (i.e16.6 km
long) are considered in scope for widening and strengthening.
1.3. C A R R I A G E W A Y
The existing carriageway width of road is 3.5 m in section 130/280 to 132/080 km and 5.5 m between 132/080 to
142/620 km. Moreover, 7 m wide existing road is present from 159/280 to 175/880 km . All three stretches are
excluding width of unpaved shoulder which is 1.0 to 2.5 m. The proposed carriage way width is 7m excluding 1.5
m paved shoulder and 1.0 m earthen shoulder on both side.
1.4. T E R R A I N
Terrain of entire project stretch is plain in nature. At very few location, road is passing near to adjoining hills and
valley.
Page 1 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

2.0 P A V E M E N T C O N D I T I O N S U R V E Y
Existing pavement condition is the most important data which governs the improvement strategy of the project.
The basic of survey was visually observed existing distresses and with the measurement whenever required.
Performance of recently construsted adjoining stretches were also surveyed for better idea about traffic and
climatic impact on highway.
2.1 V I S U A L L Y O B S E R V E D D I S T R E S S E S
Both the sections of NH - 26 from 130/280 to 142/620 Km. and 159/280 to 175/880 Km. are carefully studied to
analyse serviceability of existing pavement structure. It will also provide powerful tool to the design engineer for
development of widening, strengthening and reconstruction scheme for proposed development of project highway
Sr. No. Type of Distress Observed
1.0 Location : Ch. 130/280 to Ch. 130/580 Km (3.5 m Wide Road)
A) Settlement of shoulder B) Erosion of shoulder
C) Bituminous top edges are damaged D) Potholes on existing top

A) Bituminous top edges are damaged B) Poor condition of shoulder

A)Rutting and Cracks on existing top B) Edge brecking
C)Ravelling of pavement B) Good pavement condition

A) Good pavement condition B) Patch work on existing road

A) Good pavement condition

A) Good pavement condition C) Ravelling of pavement at only single spot

B) Ravelling of pavement at only few stretch C) Cracks in pavement top at few stretch

9.0 Location : Ch. 159/280 to Ch. 167/280 Km (7 m Wide Road)

A) Good pavement condition B) Ravelling of pavement at only few stretch

10.0 Location : Ch. 167/280 to Ch. 175/880 Km (7 m Wide Road)
A) Good pavement condition B) Ravelling of pavement at only few stretch
11.0 Location : Ch. 130/000 Recently constructed road adjoining to start point
A) Erosion of shoulder and Drainage layer
General Observations :
1 At Ch. 130/280 to 130/580 Km, erosion of shoulder and embankment is extremely danger for pavement
life even in recent constructed adjoining stretch also.
2 At Ch. 130/580 to 132/080 Km, pavement condition is extremely poor.
3 At Ch. 132/080 to 135/380 Km, existing road is affected by minor distress (i.e. cracks, ravelling and edge
breaking) apart from which is in very good condition.
4 At Ch. 135/380 to 136/030 Km, road top is quite smooth and free from distress except patch work at
some spot.
5 At Ch. 136/030 to 136/280 Km, excellent riding quality which is totally free from distress.

6 At Ch. 136/280 to 138/855 Km, excellent riding quality which is only affected at some spots due to
ravelling of pavement.
7 At Ch. 138/855 to 139/780 Km, existing road is affected by only minor distress (i.e. cracks, ravelling)
apart from which is in very excellent condition.
8 At Ch. 139/780 to 142/620 Km, excellent riding quality which is totally free from distress.
9 At Ch. 159/280 to 167/280 Km, existing bituminous top is in good condition except ravelling at very few
locatins.
10 At Ch. 167/280 to 175/880 Km, excellent riding quality which is only affected at some spots due to
ravelling of pavement.
2.2 I N V E S T I G A T I O N D E T A I L S O F E X I S T I N G C R U S T
Existing pavement crust of entire project stretch at regular intervals is evaluated and investigated by small and
large pit method. The detail of composite crust thickness is stated below;
Table 2.1 Details of Existing Crust
Section 1 : Amath to Kesinga (130.280 km to 142.620 km)
Sub Base Course Base
Existing Crust Observed Course Bituminous
Sr. No. At Road Edge
Chainage km. Layer
Moorum/Sand WBM
1 130+280 At Road Edge - LHS 190 300 35
2 131+000 At Road Edge - RHS - 200 25
3 132+000 At Road Edge - LHS - 200 25
4 133+000 At Road Edge - RHS 200 250 45
5 134+000 At Road Edge - LHS 155 250 45
6 135+000 At Road Edge - RHS 200 280 40
7 136+000 At Road Edge - LHS 200 170 130
8 137+000 At Road Edge - RHS 205 175 125
9 138+000 At Road Edge - LHS 200 250 130
10 139+000 At Road Edge - RHS 200 250 90
11 140+000 At Road Edge - LHS 200 150 125
12 141+000 At Road Edge - RHS 200 200 125
13 142+000 At Road Edge - LHS 240 250 125
Section 2 :Chancher to Bhavanipatna (159.280 Km to 175.880 km)
Sand Sub Base
Existing Crust Observed caping Base Bituminous
Sr. No. At Road Edge Course
Chainage km. layer Course Layer
GSB WMM
1 159+280 At Road Edge - RHS 150 260 250 130
2 160+000 At Road Edge - LHS 150 265 255 130
3 161+000 At Road Edge - RHS 150 260 250 130
4 162+000 At Road Edge - LHS 155 260 250 130
5 163+000 At Road Edge - RHS 175 260 250 130
6 164+000 At Road Edge - LHS 0 60 250 90
7 165+000 At Road Edge - RHS 150 250 260 140
8 166+000 At Road Edge - LHS 150 250 250 130
9 167+000 At Road Edge - RHS 160 260 260 130

Sub Base Course Base
Existing Crust Observed Bituminous
Sr. No. At Road Edge Course
Chainage km. Layer
GSB-I GSB - II WMM
10 168+000 At Road Edge - LHS 150 200 225 75
11 169+000 At Road Edge - RHS 155 200 230 80
12 170+000 At Road Edge - LHS 150 200 225 75
13 171+000 At Road Edge - RHS 150 200 225 80
14 172+000 At Road Edge - LHS 150 200 225 75
15 173+000 At Road Edge - RHS 150 200 225 75
16 174+000 At Road Edge - LHS 150 200 255 75
17 175+000 At Road Edge - LHS 150 200 225 75
The Photographs showing existing pavement crust as presented below
Ch. 130/280 Ch. 133/000 Km Ch: 138+000 Km
Ch.135/000 Km Ch: 140+000 Km Ch. 142/000 Km
Ch: 166/000 km Ch: 171/000 km Ch. 174/000 Km

2.3 T E S T R E S U L T S O F S U B G R A D E S A M P L E S
Soil samples are collected along the Project stretch " Widening & Strengthening of [NH-26] to 2 - Lane With Paved
Shoulder From 130.280 Km to 142.60 Km & 159.280 km to 175.880 km " at every 1.0 Km distance at required
depth, to determine the following soil parameters.
1 Atterberg's Limits IS:- 2720 [Part - 5]

2 Grain Size Analysis IS:- 2720 [Part - 4]
3 F.M.C IS:- 2720 [Part - 2 & 8]
Table 2.2 Test results of sub grade sample
Classification of Atterberg's Limit Grain Size Analysis

FMC
Sr. No. Sample ID Existing Subgrade
Soil L.L. P.L. P.I. G S M&C
% % % % % % %
Ch. Km -
1 SM 26 11 50 39 8.2
130+280
Ch. Km -
2 SM 21.1 2 62 36 6.1
131+000
Ch. Km -
3 SM 31.5 7 51 42 9.5
132+000
Ch. Km -
4 SM with Gravel 21.5 20 47 33 7.7
133+000
Ch. Km -
5 SM 28.1 7 48 45 10.9
134+000
NP
Ch. Km -
6 SM 23.2 2 50 48 9.3
135+000
Ch. Km -
7 SM 25.7 6 56 38 8.4
136+000
Ch. Km -
8 SM 24 1 61 38 8.2
137+000
Ch. Km -
9 SM 21.6 7 57 36 9.2
138+000
Ch. Km -
10 SM 23.7 10 58 32 8.2
139+000
Ch. Km -
11 CL 31.8 19.40 12.40 3 40 57 17.3
140+000
Ch. Km -
12 SM 27.1 4 56 40 10.8
141+000
Ch. Km -
13 SM 26.5 NP 1 54 45 10.9
142+000
Ch. Km -
14 SM 24.7 4 64 32 8.5
142+603

Atterberg's Limit Grain Size Analysis
I.S. Classification of FMC
Sr. No. Sample ID Existing Subgrade L.L. P.L. P.I. G S M&C
Soil
% % % % % % %

Ch. Km -
15 CI 37.7 21.10 16.60 2 40 58 10.1
159+200
Ch. Km -
16 ML 26.9 NP NP 0 49 51 12.5
160+000
Ch. Km -
17 CI 38.7 21.60 17.10 4 31 65 15.7
161+000
Ch. Km -
18 CL 33.2 19.20 14.00 9 39 52 14.9
162+000
Ch. Km -
19 ML 28.7 NP NP 1 47 52 13.9
163+000
Ch. Km -
20 SC 35.5 20.40 15.10 22 33 45 12.7
164+000
Ch. Km -
21 SM 22.7 NP NP 5 66 29 9.1
165+000
Ch. Km -
22 SC 32.7 18.80 13.90 4 53 43 15.8
166+000
Ch. Km -
23 HWR ….
167+000
Ch. Km -
24 HWR ….
167+200
Ch. Km -
25 CH 51.1 24.30 26.80 3 29 68 19.0
168+000
Ch. Km -
26 CI 37.5 21.50 16.00 6 40 54 12.0
168+500
Ch. Km -
27 CI 38.0 20.90 17.10 4 44 52 12.6
169+000
Ch. Km -
28 CI 39.0 22.20 16.80 3 47 50 14.0
170+000
Ch. Km -
29 CI 40.8 19.10 21.70 2 33 65 18.0
171+000
Ch. Km -
30 SC 30.0 11.80 18.20 1 51 48 14.0
171+500
Ch. Km -
31 SM 21.6 NP NP 1 54 45 12.5
172+000
Ch. Km -
32 CL 32.0 19.00 13.00 0 49 51 12.2
173+000
Ch. Km -
33 SM 24.0 NP NP 0 54 46 11.4
174+000
Ch. Km -
34 SM 29.7 NP NP 2 50 48 15.1
175+000
Ch. Km -
35 CL 33.7 18.40 15.30 3 43 54 17.0
176+000

2.3 D E F L E C T I O N S U R V E Y B Y B E N K E L M A N B E A M
The methodology adopted for Benkelman beam deflection test is in such a way that existing pavement structure
will not be affected. For deflection measurements, each road section was marked at every 50 m interval in the
outer wheel path (In the transverse direction, points should be as per type of lane from the pavement edge. If
Road width is < 3.5 m then Points should be mark at 0.6 m, when Road width is > 3.5 m then 0.9 m and when Road
is divided four lane then 1.5 m from pavement edge) in alternate roadside. For loading the pavement the static
load was applied through the standard truck having a rear axle weighing 8170 kg with a tire pressure of 5.6 kg
/cm2. Then probe was placed in-between the dual tires of rear axle on the outer wheel path and dial gauge
adjusted to zero. Instruments levelled through bubble scale. Now when the static load by truck is moved away, on
dial gauge pavement surface rebound was measured.
Deflections measured by Benkelman beam are influenced by the pavement temperature. The pavement
temperature was measured by making a hole of about 45 mm deep & 10 mm in diameter and filled with glycerol
and temperature can be then be recorded after about 5 min. with suitable short-stem mercury thermometer. For
design purpose correction for temperature variation is taken into consideration as per IRC-81-1997.
Deflections measured by Benkelman beam are also influenced by climate condition of the year. The seasonal
variation depends upon the type of sub-grade soil, it’s field moisture content and avg. rainfall of that area. For this
purpose, soil sample are colleted from the pavement edge side up to certain depth of sub-grade soil. For the design
purpose correction for seasonal variation is also taken into consideration. Further more, traffic in terms of ‘MSA’ is
considered for the overlay design.

S C H E M A T I C V I E W O F B . B . D. T E C H N I Q U E
SUMMARY OF B.B.D TEST RESULT

Table 2.3 Summary of BBD test results
Section 1 : Amath to Kesinga (130.280 km to 142.620 km).
Characteristic Characteristic
Sr. No. Chainage Sr. No. Chainage
Deflection Deflection
1 135+000 to 135+500 0.73 9 139+000 to 139+500 0.00
2 135+500 to 136+000 0.78 10 139+500 to 140+000 0.94
3 136+000 to 136+500 0.79 11 140+000 to 140+500 0.53
4 136+500 to 137+000 0.74 12 140+500 to 141+000 0.40
5 137+000 to 137+500 0.74 13 141+000 to 141+500 0.52
6 137+500 to 138+000 0.81 14 141+500 to 142+000 0.50
7 138+000 to 138+500 0.49 15 142+000 to 142+500 0.67
8 138+500 to 139+000 0.67 16 142+500 to 143+000 0.62

Section 2 :Chancher to Bhavanipatna (159.280 Km to 175.880 km).
Characteristic Characteristic
Sr. No. Chainage Sr. No. Chainage
Deflection Deflection
1 159+000 to 159+500 0.69 18 167+500 to 168+000 0.94
2 159+500 to 160+000 0.67 19 168+000 to 168+500 0.54
3 160+000 to 160+500 0.68 20 168+500 to 169+000 0.57
4 160+500 to 161+000 0.81 21 169+000 to 169+500 0.56
5 161+000 to 161+500 0.61 22 169+500 to 170+000 0.63
6 161+500 to 162+000 0.68 23 170+000 to 170+500 0.77
7 162+000 to 162+500 0.57 24 170+500 to 171+000 0.75
8 162+500 to 163+000 0.69 25 171+000 to 171+500 0.63
9 163+000 to 163+500 0.69 26 171+500 to 172+000 0.74
10 163+500 to 164+000 0.84 27 172+000 to 172+500 0.83
11 164+000 to 164+500 0.72 28 172+500 to 173+000 0.68
12 164+500 to 165+000 0.64 29 173+000 to 173+500 0.91
13 165+000 to 165+500 0.77 30 173+500 to 174+000 0.83
14 165+500 to 166+000 0.66 31 174+000 to 174+500 0.90
15 166+000 to 166+500 0.68 32 174+500 to 175+000 0.92
16 166+500 to 167+000 0.66 33 175+000 to 175+500 0.85
17 167+000 to 167+500 0.66 34 175+500 to 176+000 0.74
Photographs of B.B.D Survey
Temperature measurement for B.B.D Survey

3. M A T E R I A L S O U R C E A N A L Y S I S
Source analysis of construction materials such as granular sub base material, coarse aggregates (C.A.), fine
aggregates(Sand), moorum, bitumen, cement, steel has been carried out to cope up the project requirements as
per EPC Documents, Annexure - I [Schedule - D]. The details of avaible source, location, and average lead
distance to the project is presented below by line diagram:
Chainage in KM
Tel River
Amath Legends
130 G.S.B
Moorum
135 Sand
C.A
140
Kesinga
145
Khajura pada
150
8 km 5 km 2
Chena Gav Matri pada
155
Chancher
160
165
170
175
Not to scale Bhavanipatna
Material Samples collected from different locations are tested as per relevant standards to Check the Quality
and technical Requirements photographs of sampling and source are presented :

Summary of test results are given below for respective material.
3.1 Coarse Aggregates : Clean, Crushed, Graded Material

.-- Source : Khajurapada
.-- Technical Req. : IS : 2386
Table 3.1 Summary of test results of CA
Sr. No. Aggregate Type Test Name Results Test Method

40 mm 14
1 20 mm Combine Fl & EI % 17 I.S 2386
10 mm 24
40 mm 0.88
2 20 mm Water Absorption % 0.97 I.S 2386
10 mm 1.12
40 mm
3 20 mm Stripping Value % <5 I.S 6241
10 mm
40 mm
20 mm
4 Atterberg's Limit NP I.S 2720
10 mm
Dust
5 Impact Value % 18 I.S 2386
6 Specafic Gravity 2.67 I.S 2386
Above test results indicates that the quarry material is suitable for concrete as well as bituminous works.
3.2 Fine Aggregates : Clean Natural Sand free from Clay

.-- Source : Tel River
.-- Technical Req. : IS : 383
Table 3.2 Summary of test results of FA
Sr. No. Test Name Results Test Method

1 Water Absorption % 0.60 - 0.81 I.S 2386
2 Sieve Analysis Zone - II & III I.S 2386
3 Finess Modulas 2.12 - 2.50 I.S 2386
4 Specafic Gravity 2.55 - 2.81 I.S 2386
Above test results indicates that tel river sand of mentioned loctions in line diagram is suitable for back fill,
stabilization, GSB, WMM, Cementatious Base and Sub base mix as well as road and concrete works.

3.3 Borrow Soil
.-- Source : Khajurapada
.-- Technical Req. : MORT&H -Cl.-305
Table 3.3 Summary of test results of Borrow Soil
Sr. No. Test Name Results Test Method

Liquid Limit % 22 - 27
1 Atterberg's Limit Plastic Limit % NP I.S 2720
Plasticity Index % NP
2 CBR Value (Soaked) % 15 - 20 I.S 2720
3 Optimum Moisture Content 9 - 10 I.S 2720
4 Maximum Dry Density 1.900 - 2.000 I.S 2720
5 Free Swell Index % 20 - 25 I.S 2720
6 Mechanical Analysis I.S 2720
a Gravel 0 - 21
b sand 50 - 60
C M&C 25 - 45
Above listed tests are conducted for all source of Borrow Soil material mentioned in line diagram, which meets
requirments, hence suitable for road embankment, sub grade and shoulders.
3.4 Steel
.-- Source : There are ample rolling steel factories availble near project stretch.
The steel is to be purchased from the open market.
3.5 Cement
.-- Source : The numbers of cement factories availble within 1000 Km from project
stretch. The OPC or PPC cement is to be purchased from the open
market.
3.6 Bitumen
.-- Source :Bitumen will be available from various refinaries located at Haldia(West
Bangal), Vizag (A.P).Pavement design will be carried out using VG-40
and VG-30 grade of bitumen

4. P A V E M E N T D E S I G N
The width of existing carriageway is 3.5 m for 130/280 to 132/080 Km, 5.5 m for 132/080 to 142/620Km and 7.0 m for
159/280 to 175/880 Km excluding unpaved shoulder of 1.0 to 2.5 m wide which is carrying present volume of traffic.
Pavement condition survey has been carried out for entire stretch which concludes that project stretch from 159/280 to
175/880 km is in excellent condition. Further, stretches of 130/280 to 142/620 km are also good except few location
distress were observed such as Ravelling of aggregates, patching, pot holes, edge breaking, shoulder erosion etc. All poor
locations needs to be reconstructed/ strengthened as per the requirment.
4.1 P A V E M E N T T Y P E
The type of pavement for widening and strengthening of existing road is Flexible (As per Clause 5.2).
4.2 T R A F F I C I N T E N S I T Y
As per traffice study on project stretch and agreement Clause 5.3, pavement shall be design considering minimum 14 MSA.
4.3 R A I N F A L L I N T E N S I T Y
Rainfall of project stretch (i.e. Kesinga and Bhavanipatna) is less than 1300 mm as per website of Govt. Of Odisha,
Department of Water resource. ( Ref :- http://www.dowrorissa.gov.in/Flood/DailyFloodBulletin.htm )
4.4 I N V E S T I G A T I O N O F E X I S T I N I G S U B G R A D E S O I L
For designing of crust in widening and reconstruction stretches , the sub-grade soil samples were investigated up to depth
of 1.0 to 2.0 m. Necessary test for soil properties [physical / chemical] has been conducted in laboratory as per standard
codal provision [IS : 2720] and results are as under.
Table 4.1 Test results of existing sub grade soil

Modified Swelling
I.S Atterberg's Limit Grain Size Analysis
Sr. Proctor Density C.B.R. Index
Sample ID Classification
No.
of Soil L.L. P.L. P.I. G S M&C MDD OMC FS
% % % % % % gm/cc % % %
1 Ch. Km - 130+280 SM 26 11 50 39 1.988 8.5 10.1 39
2 Ch. Km - 131+000 SM 21.1 2 62 36 1.985 7.9 10.2 25
3 Ch. Km - 132+000 SM 31.5 7 51 42 1.966 8.8 9.8 25

SM with
4 Ch. Km - 133+000 21.5 20 47 33 2.146 8.3 15.5 20
Gravel
5 Ch. Km - 134+000 SM 28.1 7 48 45 1.972 8.4 10.5 25
NP
6 Ch. Km - 135+000 SM 23.2 2 50 48 1.955 9.5 12.5 40
7 Ch. Km - 136+000 SM 25.7 6 56 38 1.963 8.3 11.8 25
8 Ch. Km - 137+000 SM 24 1 61 38 1.974 8.1 10.2 NIL
9 Ch. Km - 138+000 SM 21.6 7 57 36 1.962 8.4 10.7 16
10 Ch. Km - 139+000 SM 23.7 10 58 32 1.977 8 15.1 27
11 Ch. Km - 140+000 CL 31.8 19.4 12.4 3 40 57 1.931 1.2 7.5 35
12 Ch. Km - 141+000 SM 27.1 4 56 40 1.977 8.5 9.5 29
13 Ch. Km - 142+000 SM 26.5 NP 1 54 45 1.973 8.6 9.8 19
14 Ch. Km - 142+603 SM 24.7 4 64 32 1.983 8.2 11.5 35

Modified Swelling
I.S Atterberg's Limit Grain Size Analysis
Sr. Proctor Density C.B.R. Index
Sample ID Classification
No.
of Soil L.L. P.L. P.I. G S M&C MDD OMC FS
% % % % % % gm/cc % % %
15 Ch. Km - 159+280 CI 37.7 21.1 16.6 2 40 58 1.902 11.2 5.1 18
16 Ch. Km - 160+000 ML 26.9 NP 0 49 51 1.968 10.2 7.9 38
17 Ch. Km - 161+000 CI 38.7 21.6 17.1 4 31 65 1.897 11.6 4.5 39
18 Ch. Km - 162+000 CL 33.2 19.2 14.0 9 39 52 1.883 12.2 7.8 44
19 Ch. Km - 163+000 ML 28.7 NP 1 47 52 1.887 9.1 7.1 39
20 Ch. Km - 164+000 SC 35.5 20.4 15.1 22 33 45 2.070 9.5 10.4 33
21 Ch. Km - 165+000 SM 22.7 NP 5 66 29 1.980 7.8 13.9 32
22 Ch. Km - 166+000 SC 32.7 18.8 13.9 4 53 43 1.915 11.2 6.5 31
23 Ch. Km - 167+000 HWR ---
24 Ch. Km - 167+200 HWR ---
25 PARTICULARS CH 51.1 24.3 26.8 3 29 68 1.868 13.4 3.6 62
26 Ch. Km - 168+500 CI 37.5 21.5 16.0 6 40 54 1.902 12 5.6 35
27 Ch. Km - 169+000 CI 38.0 20.9 17.1 4 44 52 1.895 12.2 5.8 33
28 Ch. Km - 170+000 CI 39.0 22.2 16.8 3 47 50 1.892 12.1 6.2 33
29 Ch. Km - 171+000 CI 40.8 19.1 21.7 2 33 65 1.882 12.5 5.5 49
30 Ch. Km - 171+500 SC 30.0 11.8 18.2 1 51 48 1.984 9.2 9.2 11
31 Ch. Km - 172+000 SM 21.6 NP 1 54 45 1.984 9.2 9.3 11
32 Ch. Km - 173+000 CL 32.0 19.0 13.0 0 49 51 1.904 11.4 7.2 38
33 Ch. Km - 174+000 SM 24.0 NP 0 54 46 1.960 9.1 8.8 15
34 Ch. Km - 175+000 SM 29.7 NP 2 50 48 1.940 9.4 8.2 17
35 Ch. Km - 176+000 CL 33.7 18.4 15.3 3 43 54 1.910 11.3 6.8 31
4.5. S T R E N G T H E N I N G O F T H E P R O J E C T C O R R I D O R
The Strengthening works of the existing project corridor shall be followed by the IRC:SP:73. The designing, planning as well
as the construction will not be given any chance in relieving anywhere from the stringent guidelines and specifications. The
design philosophy as well as the innovative solutions is proposed keeping the interest of the project corridor afte various
alternatives and strategies it will be decided in consultation with the authority; our respectable client.
A. P A V E M E N T C O N D I T I O N S U R V E Y
Pavement condition survey has been carried out for entire project stretch. From Km 159/280 to 176/620 Overall project
stretch is in good condition except few locations, distress were observed such as Ravelling of aggregates, localised potholes
etc. but no rutting is found on wheel path hence it will not required to rectify any patches by full depth / half depth repair
and can be effectively strengthened in view of IRC: 81. Moreover, from Ch. 130/280 to 135/00 Km road condition will not
allow to test as per IRC:81. Hence, evaluation of structural strength for remaining stretches of existing road was started
from Ch. 135/000 to 142/620 Km where bituminous top is in good condition.

B. D E S I G N S T A N D A R D S
Agreement defines standards and specifications to be followed in the development of the project corridor. The same will be
stringently complying throughout the development of the project corridor. IRC: SP: 73-2007 Manual of Specifications and
other Standards has been thoroughly reviewed and followed in preparing engineering designs for the project corridor. The
related Indian Standard Guidelines for various aspects of pavement designs have been set for the proposal. IRC: 81-1997
have been firmly followed in evaluation of the strengthening requirements of the project corridor. All related IRC, MORT&H
guidelines and specification are followed during the different stages in design and construction of the project corridor.
C. P A V E M E N T D E S I G N P H I L O S O P H Y
The pavement design has been comprehensively prepared looking at the design life, standards and specification of the
project corridor. Mainly, the project highway is evaluated in terms of strength and other structural & functional
parameters.
Performance of the flexible pavements is closely related to the elastic deflection of pavement under the wheel loads. The
deflection of the pavement indicates a part of the performance measures of the pavement.
The deflection measurements were conducted at every 50 m staggered interval on both sides of the carriageway. Due care
was taken in conducting the Benkelman Beam Deflection (BBD) Survey. The survey was conducted following the
procedures as set forth in the IRC: 81-1997.
Temperature and seasonal correction factors were determined for the deflection measurement taken at regular interval on
the project corridor. The corrected deflection measurement was then adopted for further confident evaluation following
statistical calculations. The mean deflection measurements were then derived for each 500 m section of the project
highway. The results are attached here after analysis in table 4.2.
D. O B J E C T I V E
The objective is to determine the optimum crust thickness for Overlay design [Strengthening] under given design moving
wheel load [Axle load] without occurring any distress as per IS : 2720, IRC : 37 - 2012, IRC : 81 - 1997 & MORT & H
Specification.
Soil sample are collected along the Project stretch of " Widening & Strengthening of NH - 26 to 2 - Lane With Paved Shoulder
from Km 130/280 to 142/620 and from Km 159/280 to 175/880" at every 1.0 Km distance at required depth, to determine
the below listed subgrade soil parameters. Test results of the same have been given in chapter-2, Table 2.2 of this report.
1 Atterberg's Limits IS:- 2720 [Part - 5]

2 Grain Size Analysis IS:- 2720 [Part - 4]
3 F.M.C IS:- 2720 [Part - 2 & 8]
The main aim of investigation and testing is to evaluate the deflection of existing flexible pavement under specified load.
The other parameters are also taken into consideration for overlay design such as pavement temperature, field moisture
content, type of sub-grade soil and their influence on pavement deflection & service behaviour, average intensity of rainfall
in that particular area, traffic intensity in terms of cvpd (commercial vehicle per day) on particular stretch.
To fulfil the above objective, Benkelman beam deflection test is conducted on existing pavement and then recorded data are
analyzed and on that basis the overlay design for flexible pavement is finalized.

E. D E S I G N P A R A M E T E R S (For B.B.D Survey)
Carriageway Width
-- Type : Two Lane Single Carriageway Road
-- Existing : 5.50 and 7.0 m
-- Proposed : 10 m
Rainfall Intensity : <1300 mm
Design Life : 15 Years
F. R E S U L T S U M M A R Y F O R O V E R L A Y C R U S T 0.7
Table 4.2 Details for Strengthening of Existing Road
Sr. Chainage Characteristic MSA Req. Overlay Ave. Overlay Provided Overlay
No. Deflection Thickness Thk. (mm) Thk. (mm)
(mm)
BM BM BC DBM
1 135+000 to 135+500 0.73 14 0.00 40 70
0.0
2 135+500 to 136+000 0.78 14 0.00 40 70
3 136+000 to 136+500 0.79 14 0.00 40 70
0.0
4 136+500 to 137+000 0.74 14 0.00 40 70
5 137+000 to 137+500 0.74 14 0.00 40 70
0.5
6 137+500 to 138+000 0.81 14 1.00 40 70
7 138+000 to 138+500 0.49 14 0.00 40 70
0.0
8 138+500 to 139+000 0.67 14 0.00 40 70
9 139+000 to 139+500 0.00 14 0.00 40 70
9.5
10 139+500 to 140+000 0.94 14 19.00 40 70
11 140+000 to 140+500 0.53 14 0.00 40 70
Nil
12 140+500 to 141+000 0.40 14 0.00 40 70
13 141+000 to 141+500 0.52 14 0.00 40 70
Nil
14 141+500 to 142+000 0.50 14 0.00 40 70
15 142+000 to 142+500 0.67 14 0.00 40 70
Nil
16 142+500 to 143+000 0.62 14 0.00 40 70
Section 2 : Chancher to Bhavanipatna (159.000 km to 175.880 km)
Sr. Chainage Characteristic MSA Req. Overlay Ave. Overlay Provided Overlay
No. Deflection Thickness Thk. (mm) Thk. (mm)
(mm)
BM BM BC
1 159+000 to 159+500 0.69 14 0.00 40
Nil
2 159+500 to 160+000 0.67 14 0.00 40
3 160+000 to 160+500 0.68 14 0.00 40
0.5
4 160+500 to 161+000 0.81 14 1.00 40
5 161+000 to 161+500 0.61 14 0.00 40
Nil
6 161+500 to 162+000 0.68 14 0.00 40
7 162+000 to 162+500 0.57 14 0.00 40
Nil
8 162+500 to 163+000 0.69 14 0.00 40
9 163+000 to 163+500 0.69 14 0.00 40
3.0
10 163+500 to 164+000 0.84 14 6.00 40
11 164+000 to 164+500 0.72 14 0.00 40
0.0
12 164+500 to 165+000 0.64 14 0.00 40
13 165+000 to 165+500 0.77 14 0.00 40
0.0
14 165+500 to 166+000 0.66 14 0.00 40
15 166+000 to 166+500 0.68 14 0.00 40
Nil
16 166+500 to 167+000 0.66 14 0.00 40
17 167+000 to 167+500 0.66 14 0.00 40
10.9
18 167+500 to 168+000 0.94 14 19.00 40
19 168+000 to 168+500 0.54 14 0.00 40
Nil
20 168+500 to 169+000 0.57 14 0.00 40
21 169+000 to 169+500 0.56 14 0.00 40
Nil
22 169+500 to 170+000 0.63 14 0.00 40
23 170+000 to 170+500 0.77 14 0.00 40
Nil
24 170+500 to 171+000 0.75 14 0.00 40
25 171+000 to 171+500 0.63 14 0.00 40
0.0
26 171+500 to 172+000 0.74 14 0.00 40
27 172+000 to 172+500 0.83 14 4.00 40
2.0
28 172+500 to 173+000 0.68 14 0.00 40
29 173+000 to 173+500 0.91 14 15.00 40
9.5
30 173+500 to 174+000 0.83 14 4.00 40
31 174+000 to 174+500 0.90 14 14.00 40
15.5
32 174+500 to 175+000 0.92 14 17.00 40
33 175+000 to 175+500 0.85 14 7.00 40
3.5
34 175+500 to 176+000 0.74 14 0.00 40

4.6 R E C O N S T R U C T I O N A N D W I D E N I N G O F T H E P R O J E C T C O R R I D O R
The Widening and reconstruction works of the project corridor shall be followed by the IRC:SP:73. The design philosophy
as well as the innovative solutions is proposed keeping the interest of the project corridor after various alternatives and
strategies will be decided in consultation with the authority; our respectable client. There is no land acquisition required on
the project highway. The Right of Way (RoW) will be provide on the appointed date, however in no case; it will be beyond
10 to 90 days after the appointed date as per the Schedule of the EPC agreement.
IRC: 37: 2012 Manual of Specifications and other Standards has been thoroughly reviewed and followed in preparing
engineering designs for the widening and reconstruction of project corridor. The related Indian Standard Guidelines for
various aspects of pavement designs have been used for the proposal.
A. E N G I N E E R I N G P R O P E R T I E S O F E X I S T I N I G S U B G R A D E S O I L
For design of crust in widening portion, the soil samples of sub-grade were collected at up to depth of 1 m. Necessary test
for soil properties [physical / chemical] has been conducted in laboratory as per standard codal provision [IS : 2720] and
results are given in Table 4.1 .
[a] Existing Sub-Grade Soil For Average [3 Test Results] CBR Values [CH. 130+200 to 135+000 Km] :
Table- 4.3 90th percentile CBR of CH: 130+200 to 135+000 Km

CBR in % equal to
Ch. Km Soil Type CBR %
ascending order grater than
130+280 SM 10.1 9.8 100.0
130+000 SM 10.2 10.1 83.3
132+000 SM 9.8 10.2 66.7
133+000 SM with Gravel 15.5 10.5 50.0
134+000 SM 10.5 12.5 33.3
135+000 SM 12.5 15.5 16.7
90th Percentile CBR

100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5 17.0
Hence, 90th Percentile CBR of Existing Subgrade Soil for this stretch is 10 %
[b] Existing Sub-Grade Soil For Average [3 Test Results] CBR Values [CH. 135+000 to 142+620 Km] :

CBR in % equal to
Ch. Km Soil Type CBR % ascending order grater than
136+000 SM 11.8 7.5 100.0
137+000 SM 10.2 9.5 87.5
138+000 SM 10.7 9.8 75.0
139+000 SM 15.1 10.2 62.5
140+000 CL 7.5 10.7 50.0
141+000 SM 9.5 11.5 37.5
142+000 SM 9.8 11.8 25.0
142+603 SM 11.5 15.1 12.5

100.0
90th Percentile CBR
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17
th
Hence, 90 Percentile CBR of Existing Subgrade Soil for this stretch is 9.2 %
[c] Existing Sub-Grade Soil For Average [3 Test Results] CBR Values [CH. 159+280 to 167+000 Km] :

CBR in % equal to
Ch. Km Soil Type CBR %
ascending order grater than
159+280 CI 5.10 4.50 100.0
160+000 ML 7.90 5.10 88.9
161+000 CI 4.50 6.50 77.8
162+000 CL 7.80 7.10 66.7
163+000 ML 7.10 7.80 55.6
164+000 SC 10.40 7.90 44.4
165+000 SM 13.90 10.40 33.3
166+000 SC 6.50 13.90 22.2
167+000 HWR 30.00 30.0 11.1
90th Percentile CBR

100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
3.50 4.50 5.50 6.50 7.50 8.50 9.50 10.50 11.50 12.50 13.50
[d] Existing Sub-Grade Soil For Average [3 Test Results] CBR Values [CH. 167+000 to 171+000 Km] :

CBR in % equal to
167+200 HWR 30.0 3.6 100.0
168+000 CH 3.6 5.5 83.3
168+500 CI 5.6 5.6 66.7
169+000 CI 5.8 5.8 50.0
170+000 CI 6.2 6.2 33.3
171+000 CI 5.5 30.0 16.7

100.0 90th Percentile CBR
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
th
Hence, 90 Percentile CBR of Existing Subgrade Soil for this stretch is 5 %
[e] Existing Sub-Grade Soil For Average [3 Test Results] CBR Values [CH. 171+000 to 175+880 Km] :

CBR in % equal to
171+500 SC 9.2 6.8 100.0
172+000 SM 9.3 7.2 83.3
173+000 CL 7.2 8.2 66.7
174+000 SM 8.8 8.8 50.0
175+000 SM 8.2 9.2 33.3
176+000 CL 6.8 9.3 16.7
100.0
90th Percentile CBR
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
B. D E S I G N C . B . R .
There is significant difference between the CBR values of existing sub grade soil along the alignment. Here it is considered
that borrow material to be use for all the five stretches will have minimum CBR equal to 90th percentile of existing
subgrade CBR. Hence, the recommended design C.B.R. based on 90th percentile of CBR values of existing subgrade soil are
presented below :
Table - 4.8 Details of Design CBR
Design CBR MR of
Chainage Km
% Sub grade (Mpa)
a 130+280 to 135+000 10.00 76.83

b 135+000 to 142+620 9.20 72.83
c 159+280 to 167+000 5.00 50.00
d 167+000 to 171+000 5.00 50.00
e 171+000 to 175+880 7.00 61.15

4.7 D E T A I L S O F P R A P O S E D P A V E M E N T C R U S T
The designed flexible pavement composition using above subgrade strength are given in Table 4.10. The actual tensile strains were
calculated using the various pavement design parameters as inputs in the IITPAVE program. The actual strains are computed using
various trial pavement structural layer combinations. The tyre pressure used in the analysis is 0.56 Mpa. Standard axle used in dual
type, having a mass of 8160 Kg. This resulted in a single tyre load of 20012 N. The Poisson's ratio of bituminous layer and sub-grade
layers is taken as 0.35 . Resilient modulus/ Elastic modulus for Bituminous layers as 3000 MPa for VG-40 and 1700 MPa for VG-30.
The calculated strains are presented in Annexure I. Looking to pavement strengthening requirements of existing pavement and
design of widening portion , 40mm Bituminous concrete shall be extended on full width i.e. in widening & strengthening portion
From structural considerations, the recommended thicknesses for overlay, reconstruction and widening in form of Granular Sub
base, Wet Mix Macadam and Bituminous layers is mentioned below :

Table 4.10 Proposed crust composition for widening and strengthening stretches
MR of Thickness of layers in mm
Sr Length
Chainage in Km Sub grade On Existing road In Widening portion
no. (Km)
(Mpa) BC DBM WMM GSB BC DBM WMM GSB
1 130+280 to 130+580 76.83 0+300 40 70 250 --- 40 70 250 200
3 135+380 to 136+030 72.83 0+650 40 70 --- --- 40 70 250 200
5 136+280 to 138+855 72.83 2+575 40 70 --- --- 40 70 250 200
7 139+780 to 142+620 72.83 2+840 40 70 --- --- 40 70 250 200
8 159+280 to 167+280 50.00 8+000 40 --- --- --- 40 70 250 160
9 167+280 to 171+000 50.00 3+720 40 --- --- --- 40 70 250 180
10 171+000 to 175+880 61.15 4+880 40 --- --- --- 40 70 250 180
Proposed crust composition for reconstruction stretches
Thickness of layers in mm
MR of
Sr Length
Chainage in Km Sub grade For raising of existing road with reconstruction
no. (Km)
(Mpa) BC DBM WMM GSB
2 130+580 to 135+380 76.83 4+800 40 70 250 200
4 136+030 to 136+280 72.83 0+250 40 70 250 200
6 138+855 to 139+780 72.83 0+925 40 70 250 200
NOTE: VG-30 grade of bitumen is used for stretches 130.280 km to 142.620 km & 171.000 km to 175.880 km and VG-40
grade of bitumen is used for stretches 159.280 km to 167.280 km & 167.280 km to 171.000 km.
4.8 R E S T A R E A 0.7
The design standards are based on the following references:

1.0 IRC : 37 : 2012 Guidelines for Design of Flexible Pavement
2.0 IRC : SP : 73 : 2007 Manual of Standards & Specifications for Two Laning of SH on BOT Basis
3.0 IRC : 81 : 1997 Guidelines for Strengthening of Flexible Pavement
4.0 IRC : SP : 42 : 1980 Guidelines for Road Drainage
5.0 IRC : 111 : 2009 Specifications for Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes
6.0 IRC : 109 : 1997 Guidelines for Wet Mix Macadam
7.0 MORT&H Ministry Of Road Transport & Highway - 5th Revision
8.0 IS : 2720 Soil Analysis
9.0 IS : 2386 Coarse & Fine Aggregates Analysis
Page 24
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
ANNEXURE - I
Allowable strain at critical location
Fatigue Life of the pavement composition :
Nf = 2.21 x 10-04 x [1/Et]3.89 x [1/MR]0.854
Nf = Fatigue life in number of standard axles.

Et =Maximum tensile strain at bottom of the bituminous layer
MR =resilient modulus of the bituminous layer. ( 3000 Mpa.)
1/3.89
Nf 1
0.854 -04 =
[1/MR] x 2.21 x 10 Et
Nf = 14000000 Number of Standard Axles

0.854
[1/MR] = 0.001072849 MR = 3000
Allowable Tensile Strain on bottom of Bituminous Layer
Et = 2.8830 x 10-04
Rutting of pavement composition :
N= 4.1656 x 10-08 x [1/Ev]4.5337
N= Rutting life in number of standard axles.
Ev = Vertical strain in the sub grade
1/4.5337
N 1
=
4.1656 x 10-08 Ev
N = 14000000 Number of Standard Axles

4.1656E-08
Allowable Compressive Strain on the top of Subgarde

EV = 6.250 x 10-04
Page 25
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
Allowable strain at critical location
Fatigue Life of the pavement composition :
Nf = 2.21 x 10-04 x [1/Et]3.89 x [1/MR]0.854
Nf = Fatigue life in number of standard axles.

Et =Maximum tensile strain at bottom of the bituminous layer
MR =resilient modulus of the bituminous layer. ( 1700 MPa.)
1/3.89
Nf 1
0.854 -04 =
[1/MR] x 2.21 x 10 Et
Nf = 14000000 Number of Standard Axles

0.854
[1/MR] = 0.001742596 MR = 1700
Allowable Tensile Strain on bottom of Bituminous Layer
Et = 3.265 x 10-04
Rutting of pavement composition :
N= 4.1656 x 10-08 x [1/Ev]4.5337
N= Rutting life in number of standard axles.
Ev = Vertical strain in the sub grade
1/4.5337
N 1
=
4.1656 x 10-08 Ev
N = 14000000 Number of Standard Axles

4.1656E-08
Allowable Compressive Strain on the top of Subgarde

EV = 6.250 x 10-04
Page 26
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
INPUT SHEET - TCS -1
Chainage 135+380 to 136+030 km, 136+280 to 138+855 km , 139+780 to 142+620 km
Crust Composition ( As per IRC 37 2012 Clause 10.1) :
Layer Perticulars Thickness (mm)

BC Wearing course 40
DBM Binder Course 70
WMM Base 250
GSB Sub Base 200
Total 560
CBR of Existing Subgrade 9.2%
Input given in IITPAVE
For Subgrade For Granular Layers

0.64
MR subgrade = 17.6 x CBR MR = 0.2 x h 0.45 x MR subgrade
MR subgrade = 17.6 x 9.2 0.64 MR = 0.2 x 450
0.45
x 72.83
MR subgrade = 72.83 MPa MR = 227.67 Mpa
Page 27
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
RESULT SHEET - TCS - 1
Out puts of IIT Pave for Horizontal tensile Strain at bottom of Bituminous Layer
Table 1.1
Out puts of IIT Pave for Vertical Strain in subgrade

Table 1.2
For the above thickness, the strains at critical locations calculated by IITPAVE software are :
Tensile Strain on bottom of BC ( Et ) = 2.922 x 10-04 <3.265 x 10-04
Compressive Strain on the top of Subgarde ( Ev ) = 3.495 x 10-04 <6.250 x 10-04
Hence, Proposed Crust Composition is safe for 14 MSA.
Page 28
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
Chainage 130+580 to 135+380 km

DBM Binder course 70
WMM Base 250
GSB Sub Base 200
Total 560
CBR of Existing Subgrade 10%

0.64
0.64 0.45
MR subgrade = 17.6 x 10 MR = 0.2 x 450 x 76.82
MR subgrade = 76.82 MPa MR = 227.75
Page 29
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
RESULT SHEET - TCS 2
Table 2.1
Out puts of IIT Pave for Vertical Compressive Strain in subgrade

Table 2.2

Page 30
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
INPUT SHEET - TCS - 2
Chainage 136+030 to 136+280 km, 138+855 to 139+780 km

WMM Base 250
GSB Sub Base 200
Total 560

MR subgrade = 17.6 x 9.2 0.64 MR = 0.2 x h 0.45 x MR subgrade
MR subgrade = 17.6 x 9.2 0.64 0.45
MR = 0.2 x 450 x 72.83
MR subgrade = 72.83 MPa MR = 227.67
Page 31
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
Table 2.1(a)

Table 2.2(b)

Page 32
ARCONS - DDB (JV)

DBM Binder Course 70
WMM Base 250
GSB Sub Base 200
Total 560
CBR of Existing Subgrade 10%

0.64
MR subgrade = 17.6 x 10 0.64 0.45
MR = 0.2 x 400 x 76.82
MR subgrade = 76.82 MPa MR = 227.75 MPa
Page 33
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
Table 3.1

Table 3.2

Page 34
ARCONS - DDB (JV)

WMM Base 250
GSB Sub Base 180
Existing GSB Drain Layer 150
Total 690

MR subgrade = 10 x CBR MR = 0.2 x h 0.45 x MR subgrade
0.45
MR subgrade = 10 x 5 MR = 0.2 x 580 x 50
MR subgrade = 50 MPa MR = 175.203 MPa
Page 35
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
Table 4.1

Table 4.2

Page 36
ARCONS - DDB (JV)

WMM Base 250
GSB Sub Base 160
Total 670

MR subgrade = 10 x CBR MR = 0.2 x h 0.45 x MR subgrade
0.45
MR subgrade = 10 x 5 MR = 0.2 x 560 x 50
MR subgrade = 50 MPa MR = 172.459MPa
Page 37
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
Table 5.1

Table 5.2
Tensile Strain on bottom of BC (Et) = 2.602 x 10-04 <2.883 x 10-04

Compressive Strain on the top of Subgarde (Ev) = 3.371x 10-04 <6.250 x 10-04
Page 38
ARCONS - DDB (JV)

WMM Base 250
GSB Sub Base 180
Total 690

0.64
0.64 0.45
MR subgrade = 17.6 x 7 MR = 0.2 x 600 x 61.14
MR subgrade = 61.14 MPa MR = 217.55 MPa
Page 39
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
Table 6.1

Table 6.2

Page 40
ARCONS - DDB (JV)
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16
M M M
L L L
K K K
1935
J J J
I I I
H 425 H H
G G G
F
F F
E
GRADE OF BITUMEN = VG-30
E E
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION - 1

D D
1. 135.380 to 136.030 km C
C
2. 136.280 to 138.855km C
3. 139.780 to 142.620 km B
B B
WIDENING AND STRENGTHENING STRETCHES

A
A A
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16
GEO DESIGN & RESEARCH (P).LTD Page 41 ARCONS-DDB (JV)

16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16
M M M
L L L
K K K
J J J
I I I
H H H
G G G
F
F F
E
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION -2

E E
D
1. 130.580 to 135.380 km D
2. 136.030 to 136.280 km
C
3. 138.855 to 139.780 km C
B
RECONSTRUCTION STRETCHES B
A
A A
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16

16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16
M M M
L L L
K K K
J J J
I I I
H H H
G G G
F
F F
E
E E
D TYPICAL CROSS SECTION - 3 D
130.280 to 130.580 km
C C
WIDENING AND STRENGTHENING STRETCHES B
B B
A
A A
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16

16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16
M M M
L L L
K K K
J J J
I I I
H H H
G G G
F
F F
E
E E
D TYPICAL CROSS SECTION - 4 D
167.280 to 171.000 km
C C
WIDENING AND STRENGTHENING STRETCHES B
B B
A
A A
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16

16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
M M
L L
K K
J J
I I
H H
G G
F
F
E
E
C
159.280 to 167.280 km B

A
A
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
M M
L L
K K
J J
I I
H H
G G
F
F
E
E
C
171.000 to 175.880 km B

A
A
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Widening & Strengthening Of: Nh-26 in The State of Odisha

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Widening & Strengthening Of: Nh-26 in The State of Odisha

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Widening & Strengthening Of: Nh-26 in The State of Odisha

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION & DESIGN REPORT

WIDENING & STRENGTHENING OF

DESIGN CONSULTANT REVISION -1 EPC CONTRACTOR

ARCONS - DDB (JV)

S.NO. PARTICULARS PAGE

1.0 PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION AND CONDITION SURVEY...................................................................................................................

2.0 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY............................................................................................................................................. 1

3.0 MATERIAL SOURCE ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................................ 14

4.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN.................................................................................................................................................................. 17

ARCONS - DDB (JV)

ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Page 1 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

C) Bituminous top edges are damaged D) Potholes on existing top

2.0 Location : Ch. 130/580 to Ch. 132/080 Km (3.5 m Wide Road)

Page 2 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

C)Ravelling of pavement B) Good pavement condition

4.0 Location : Ch. 135/380 to Ch. 136/030 Km (5.5 m Wide Road)

5.0 Location : Ch. 136/030 to Ch. 136/280 Km (5.5 m Wide Road)

Page 3 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

A) Good pavement condition C) Ravelling of pavement at only single spot

7.0 Location : Ch. 138/855 to Ch. 139/780 Km (5.5 m Wide Road)

Page 4 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

9.0 Location : Ch. 159/280 to Ch. 167/280 Km (7 m Wide Road)

A) Good pavement condition B) Ravelling of pavement at only few stretch

Page 5 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

A) Good pavement condition B) Ravelling of pavement at only few stretch

Page 6 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Page 7 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Ch. 130/280 Ch. 133/000 Km Ch: 138+000 Km

Ch.135/000 Km Ch: 140+000 Km Ch. 142/000 Km

Ch: 166/000 km Ch: 171/000 km Ch. 174/000 Km

Page 8 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

1 Atterberg's Limits IS:- 2720 [Part - 5]

Classification of Atterberg's Limit Grain Size Analysis

Page 9 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Section 2 :Chancher to Bhavanipatna (159.280 Km to 175.880 km)

Page 10 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Page 11 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

SUMMARY OF B.B.D TEST RESULT

Page 12 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Photographs of B.B.D Survey

Temperature measurement for B.B.D Survey

Page 13 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Not to scale Bhavanipatna

Page 14 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

3.1 Coarse Aggregates : Clean, Crushed, Graded Material

Table 3.1 Summary of test results of CA

Sr. No. Aggregate Type Test Name Results Test Method

3.2 Fine Aggregates : Clean Natural Sand free from Clay

Table 3.2 Summary of test results of FA

Sr. No. Test Name Results Test Method

Page 15 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Table 3.3 Summary of test results of Borrow Soil

Sr. No. Test Name Results Test Method

Page 16 ARCONS - DDB (JV)

Table 4.1 Test results of existing sub grade soil

2 Ch. Km - 131+000 SM 21.1 2 62 36 1.985 7.9 10.2 25

3 Ch. Km - 132+000 SM 31.5 7 51 42 1.966 8.8 9.8 25