Core Level 3: HPE 353W Research Paper
Core Level 3: HPE 353W Research Paper
Core Level 3: HPE 353W Research Paper
I. Introduction
a. Description of study
b. Conclusion of study
V. The type of occupational therapy that is most effective when done alone.
VI. Conclusion
b. Overview of studies
3
Introduction
Down syndrome is the most common (1 in 732 live births are down syndrome) immediate
neurogenic cause of intellectual disabilities, yet there are limited ways to help improve this
syndrome (Daunheaur & Fidler, 2014). One might ask, what is Down Syndrome? Down
Syndrome is a system of “delays and differences in cognitive, language, motor and sensory
development” (Bruni & Cameron, 2010). A study was conducted about the “phenotype of DS. It
was discovered that the DS phenotype and occupational therapy could potentially be relevant to
each other (Daunhauer & Fidler, 2010). With DS being such a common disability, it is necessary
to find ways to help alter the brain of those with DS to function properly. One of the most
prevalent ways is occupational therapy. Occupational therapy is utilizing the help of a therapist
to regain or develop lost daily tasks. Taking into consideration the two definitions just described
occupational therapy is one of the ways tested to help with the development of life skills for
those individuals with DS. But, is occupational therapy an effective way to help with this
Current research shows it seems that occupational therapy alone does not have the most
prominent impact on people affected with DS. All studies found during literature review, have
needed further research to test each hypothesis, even though the studies had results.
One study in particular had results that solidified how occupational therapy is effective to
those with down syndrome when done throughout their lives. The study tested elephant theories
4
on one with DS to see if one could use elephant therapy to work posture control, balance, and
visual motor integration (Satainsukpong & Pongsakari, 2016). The study included sixteen
children with DS from ages one to six, placing them into two groups: a control and experimental
group. The researchers gave both groups the same schedule, one had an additional activity. The
experimental group took part in the Thai Elephant- Assisted Therapy Program(TEATP) two
times per week for two months along with their regular occupational therapy. At the conclusion
of the study, there were no major outcomes in postural control or balance, but there was a huge
difference in visual motor integration. The researchers that completed this study (Satainsukpong,
Pongsakri, and Sasat) came to the conclusion that all three categories could have benefitted if the
TEATP was completed more often and for a longer amount of time.
In this study, parents completed surveys and questionnaires to address the development of
motor and sensory skills and the delays in language and cognitive abilities in their child with DS.
Parents of three to ten year olds were included in the study. When addressing the results,
researchers noticed that the most substantial differences were in the weak, unresponsive
sensation, and the auditory filtering sections of the surveys (Bruni & Dua, 2010). The results
show how difficult it is for not only the children with DS but also the parents. In the parental
Occupational therapy is conducted to achieve the goal of correcting disabilities, task that seem
minor to most, can be hard for those with DS. It is seen in these two studies that occupational
therapy is of utmost importance to those with DS, but it is most effective when combining
stimulations effects
A study was done to analyze occupational therapy and simultaneous sensory stimulations
(SSS) on patients with DS. Muscular hypotonia, developmental delays, and sensory integration
were analyzed. Two groups of six to eighteen month old babies were split into an experimental
and control group: one that participated in only occupational therapy and the other in
occupational therapy and SSS. Throughout the experiment, there was not a significant difference
between the two groups. When evaluating the end results of the experiment, it was discovered
that and early use of SSS can improve quality of fine motor skills in infants with DS (Karimi &
Nazi, 2010). Considering the results from this study, evidence has made clear that along with
other programs, occupational therapy is effective when correcting the complications in people
with this disability. Although these methods are connected with other practices, starting the
A typical occupational therapy environment for an individual with DS would include but
not be limited to participating in activities and exercises such as self feeding practice and fine
motor practice by helping them progress over obstacles that could take a lifetime without the
help of therapy. It may seem that this is a simple process can be completed and fix the problem.
But, in reality, there are a multitude of factors affecting the performance and progress of each
individual. A common misconception of therapy is that all cases are the same, but there are no
two people exactly the same. With this in mind, it may seem extremely hard to work with
occupational therapist, but with the help of other programs that have been described, it becomes
simpler, and occupational therapy becomes effective to those who are affected by DS.
As evidence has indicated, it has been advised that occupational therapy be conducted with
the addition of another activity like TEATP or SSS. But if only one therapy is used on correcting
this syndrome, what kind of occupational therapy would be the best to use? From current
research, play based occupational therapy seems to have the most positive results. A study was
conducted in Mumbai on ten children with DS that varied from ages 2-6 years old. In this study,
the ten kids were observed in a rehabilitation center for children for one month where they
participated in play based occupational therapy. When the month was over, there were
significantly higher results of success. The confidence interval rate is now at ninety- nine percent
when conducting this therapy (Solak & Gokhale, 2014). With results like these, it is hopeful to
many handling DS that these obstacles can be overcome with the right type of therapy for the
specific patient.
Conclusion
Throughout this research, it has been made clear that there are multiple factors affecting
the effectiveness of occupational therapy which help individuals perform daily tasks. With many
types of research that have been conducted and the ones being conducted now, the hope for
having little to no problem with the communication issues of individuals with DS is a goal that is
coming closer to being accomplished. Throughout this research, knowledge has been
enhance the results. Testing that was discussed throughout this research included the Thai
Elephant assisted therapy program, parental surveys on sensory processing issues, and
7
simultaneous sensory stimulations. In the TEATP, the results were not significant when it came
to the postural control or balance. The researchers who conducted this did find out that the visual
motor integration rate went up significantly. They also believe that it could have increased the
balance and posture if it was done more often. Even though this study did not have the most
adequate results, it did improve the quality of life in at least one way for the patients with DS.
The second study shown was the parental surveys concerning sensory processing issues. The
results from the parents was a definite difference in the energy, responsive, and auditory filtering
sections, all being inadequate. This study gave useful information to the parents and the
therapists concerning the processing of sensory patterns. It also provided a wholesome amount of
new data for future research. The third and final study that was reviewed for this thesis was
simultaneous sensory stimulation. SSS was tested to see if it could add any additional progress to
occupational therapy. Throughout the test, it was shown that SSS and occupational therapy
worked wonderfully together and had greater results than just occupational therapy alone had. To
conclude these studies, with the research being done, it showed how occupational therapy is
effective to individuals with DS to perform daily tasks. Without the help of occupational therapy,
these patients would most likely be unable to control the use of their facial muscle, making them
unable to eat independently. Also if an individual participates in occupational therapy, they gain
independence by learning how to take care of themselves: feeding, bathing, dressing, cleaning,
etc. Without the help of occupational therapy, these patients could not live on their own or even
begin to be an independent human. From the research, one could be made aware of the multitude
occupational therapy, to get the best results in all categories, an individual with DS could do
other activities like the ones shown in this study to improve exponentially. DS seems to be
8
negative to some, but occupational therapy makes those who are affected by it more positive
Works Cited
Bruni M, Cameron D, Dua S, Noy S (2010). Reported Sensory Processing of Children with
Daunhauer LA, Fidler DJ (2010). The Down Syndrome Phenotype: Implications for Practice and
Gemus M, Lane M (2009). Using Gross Motor Function Measure to Evaluate Motor
Karimi H, Nazi S, Sajeda F, Akbar FN, Karimlo M (2010). Comparison of (sic) Effect of
Development of the Infants with Down Syndrome. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology 4: 39-44.
Daunhauer LA, Will E, Fidler DJ (2014). School Functions in Students with Down Syndrome.
Spencer M (2016). Core Concepts and Definition of Occupational Therapy. British Journal of
Solank PV, Gokhale P, Agarwal P (2014). To Study the Effectiveness of Play Based Therapy on
Play Behavior of Children with Down Syndrome. Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy 46:
41-48.