Soft Skills Are Smart Skills: October 2011
Soft Skills Are Smart Skills: October 2011
net/publication/242208755
CITATIONS READS
7 2,942
4 authors, including:
Prasad Kaipa
Indian School of Business
21 PUBLICATIONS 174 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Prasad Kaipa on 03 July 2014.
Executive Summary
Soft skills like leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution, negotiation,
communication, creativity and presentation skills are essential for entrepreneurial success
and for maximizing human capital in any enterprise. When balanced with a good
management team and an effective human resource management system, soft skills
provide a way to get the highest return on the investment in terms of human capital.
While professional skills may open the door of opportunity, soft skills keep you in the
driver’s seat. We offer our Top 10 list of items that an entrepreneur should focus on and
some suggested competencies.
The chapter begins with a conversation between one of the authors (PK) and Peter
Senge, author of the Fifth Discipline and one of the foremost management thinkers of
today. The three main sections of the chapter will proceed from a discussion of Soft Skills
to be followed by Building the Management Team and ending with Human Talent
Management. The chapter will conclude with more conversation with Peter Senge.
Introduction
Thanks to TIE, many engineers and entrepreneurs from the Indus Valley region
created successful ventures and broke the glass ceiling in 1990s. The next challenge is to
create sustainable enterprises and visionary companies that are built to last. The key lies
in how you use your people. Human capital management is an inside-out issue and your
chances of success are multiplied to the extent that you maximize your human capital.
While other sections of the book address how to acquire and work with financial
capital, licensing, technology issues, mergers and other very important issues, this section
addresses the soft but extremely important human capital issues.
Peter Senge, one of the foremost management thinkers of today and the author of
the Fifth Discipline states, in a recent interview with the authors, that he has found a
tremendous alignment between the basic ideas of organizational learning and Asian
cultures. This could be a “discontinuous, big opportunity for the 21st century” and Asian
entrepreneurs are uniquely poised to take advantage of this opportunity to make a
difference. When rooted in their culture and spirituality, Asian entrepreneurs can make a
big difference developing a different approach to capitalism that respects natural capital,
social capital and human capital in addition to financial capital. This is where the value
differentiation can be made if you choose to pay attention.
How can such a difference be made? What would allow an entrepreneur to be
successful in the financial terms while respecting the environment, social capital, and
human capital?
We present an approach to maximize the human capital by balancing the focus on
important soft skills development, building the management team, and creating an
appropriate talent management system. We believe that these are three corners of a
triangle; ignoring or failing to pay adequate attention to any of the three will impede your
success.
Soft
Skills
Human
Capital
Soft skills are critical to all facets of the venture. They can provide great energy
and cohesion for the members of the enterprise. Your success is more secure with an
experienced management team at the top. You don’t want to gamble on the abilities of
you and your cofounders to grow the company at optimal rates through all the different
stages of the enterprise. Finally, your human resource management system allows you to
harvest the creativity of your talent. People leave or lose motivation at different times.
Without the proper system, you can keep making the same mistakes. When appropriate
attention is paid to all the three corners, you begin to maximize and grow the human
capital because you build capacity in the system.
When your enterprise is optimized around the three corners, each corner
multiplies the value of other two. Of course, when the enterprise is sub-optimized, then
each corner operates at a fraction of its capacity and hence the net result is much less than
what you are capable of.
We begin with the interview with Senge on the topic of soft skills. A discussion of
soft skills and how they could help save your company will follow. The next section will
consider building the management team followed by a section on human resource
management. Finally, we conclude the section after presenting the second part of the
interview with Senge.
The Interview
Kaipa: What are some of the key soft skills for entrepreneurs who are building
enterprises of the future.
Senge: By definition, entrepreneurial venture is a sense of shared vision; people
who share common passion. It [entrepreneurial venture] is art of creating balance
between convergence and divergence. People have clear idea and common focus about a
particular product, particular results, or particular customer or market. They can work
together with common values when all they have to work with in the beginning is
creativity. The convergence and focus on product or customer or market should not kill
the creativity.
It is a sophisticated field. Classical OL [organizational learning] skills would be
very useful here. Conversational skills would need to be good for building good
entrepreneurial teams in the beginning. Very few people are good in dealing with conflict.
Conflict, when dealt with appropriately, could be very generative but many people end
up just having fights in the name of conflict management. They don’t really harness the
creative potential.
Kaipa: What are the critical soft skills and learning skills for building an executive
team?
Senge: It takes off from where we began a minute ago. Very few executives are
good in dealing with conflict in teams. I really do think that basic inquiry skills, the ability
to distinguish interpretations from data, the ability to pose questions that really help
people learn more from the situations in which they find themselves. I really don’t know
how else to say it. It is developing shared appreciation of the reality in which they are
working; and it is pretty hard work. The Appreciative Inquiry (AI) work of David
Cooperrider et al would be very useful here. It is about dealing with differences and
potential conflicts appreciatively. That seems to be quite crucial.
Kaipa: I have outlined my critical Top 10 list of soft skills for you. (presented
later in the chapter) These are the top 10 soft skills that I have come up with for
entrepreneurs to build sustainable and profitable enterprises that stay long after they are
gone. Do you feel these cover what you would consider as key skills.
Senge: I think they are great. The only thing at this point that I detect missing is
something about developing a theory of business. Peter Drucker keeps saying that people
make implicit decisions and barely make the theory explicit. Without an explicit and
coherent theory, a Company does not sustain for long. Mental models tools help to make
that explicit but how you inter relate different images and mental models the executive
team has into a coherent picture – what is our theory, where are we at, how do we
generate value, key sources of distinctiveness. Are we sophisticated in building shared
understanding? How do we look for disconfirming evidence that identifies what is wrong
with our theory?
Soft Skills
Preparation
Planning a venture is like mapping a route before a long trip -- beware of the
consequences of decisions you make about your destination, with whom you are
traveling, and how you will get there. A quality business plan is the roadmap to success.
Starting the venture is like initiating the journey that you have been dreaming about for a
long time. Focus on hiring the right people with the right skill-set (and passion). Strive to
create a culture of teamwork and commitment coupled with high quality execution, which
will allow you to reach the destination safely and successfully.
Imagine this to be a long trip on water. You and your executive team are the crew,
your business plan is your map of the turbulent ocean, which is the market place, and the
ship is your organizational system optimized for your journey as well as for getting the
best out of your talent. Your executive team needs to be top notch with experience and
expertise in operating your ship. It is very likely that at least some of them have been on
this journey before with knowledge of how to deal with unexpected changes in weather,
hurricanes and, of course, potential mutinies on the ship. Your engineers (crew) have
experience with your system (ship)--- software, approach, and equipment. They need to
have the tools and training to navigate it (Java or dot NET or other software tools if you
are building an internet software company), and have expertise to fix unexpected
problems that are bound to come up while you are in the ocean.
Your plans must include food for the crew e.g. rewards and recognition, stock-
option plans, and road map to first release of your product/service. It must also include
enough fuel for the ship to last until your next port/dock e.g. money to pay for salaries
and equipment till the next round of funding. If the crewmembers do not trust one another
or do not cooperate, then the culture on the ship is unstable and you may never reach
your next port, let alone, the destination.
If you have holes in the ship above the waterline, don’t worry: they can be fixed
without interrupting the journey and without any issues. Technical and professional skills
of the people in your venture are generally like holes in the hull above the waterline. You
can develop them or find new people with those skills. The lack of ‘soft skills’ is much
like holes below the waterline. If you have these holes, then it can be a serious problem.
Some holes can be fixed from inside and if they are small enough, you can reach port
safely and then undertake the repairs to the ship. Other kind of holes under the waterline
will sink you surely and steadily.
While the rest of the book addresses various professional and technical
skills/competencies to make the entrepreneurial venture successful, this section addresses
the three key issues that make or break your company. They are your executive team,
your talent management system (HR systems, culture, hiring, retaining, motivating and
knowledge transfer processes etc.), and soft skills (leadership, decision making, conflict
resolution, negotiation, communication, creativity and presentation skills).
While gasoline fuels the ship and money fuels a financial institution, Human
capital fuels the entrepreneurial venture. There are three main components to what
SelfCorp calls the “human capital triangle.” The right people, the right skills and right
management system constitute the three corners of this triangle. Maximizing human
capital requires the right balance between the executive team and development of
appropriate skill-sets with proper talent management systems and culture.
Numerous studies have shown that the vast majority of projects, which focus on
systems development and deployment in big organizations, are late, over-budget, or
cancelled. These studies have also shown that the underlying causes of project failures
are rarely technical (idea related). Most project failures can be attributed to breakdowns
in communication between executives and the talent, teams, and project managers. When
the talent management system, including executive teams and skill sets (technical,
professional and soft skills), are not balanced and optimized, then financial capital and
human capital do not pay the returns for which one hopes.
Many entrepreneurial ventures fail even though they have great ideas and great
talent because they lack the appropriate structures and processes to move forward. In
addition, when the focus is too much on ‘hard technical skills,’ the dynamics in the
workplace become difficult to manage and many companies never see their first
anniversary because they lack soft skills.
In our work with many startups and Fortune 100 companies, we have seen that
failure to balance and maximize the human capital triangle can make or break them. When
the right team is not in place at the top of the hierarchy, decision-making suffers. When
you don’t make right decisions at the right time, markets can change and competition
grows in ways unexpected. When the HR systems are not optimized, people may not get
paid. Without soft skills poor decisions are made, negotiations go poorly, communication
lacks passion, and leadership withers away fairly quickly. We address soft skills in this
chapter while the executive team and talent management issues are addressed in the
sections that follow in this chapter.
Nearly one-quarter of executives in high-tech positions are "in trouble" due to
poor people skills, says Hagberg Consulting Group, a management consulting firm.
According to Greg Netland, president of the IT division at New Boston Systems, “about
70% of managers we do business with feel soft skills are more important than they were
five years ago." Technical skills get you in the door, but soft skills keep you in the job.
Companies sink or swim based on soft skills regardless whether their technologies keep
them afloat temporarily. Great technology and mediocre management leads to sure
failure!
Leadership is the key. According to Fortune's Most Admired Companies in 1998,
“the truth is that no one factor makes a company admirable, but if you were forced to
pick the one that makes the most difference, you'd pick Leadership." Leadership is one
of the key soft skills along with communication, creativity, learning and teamwork.
Emotional Sensitivity to the emotional aspects of life A personal sense of “feeling good” at
Intelligence and how personal attitudes and expressions work (and at home) that can assist in
(EQ) influence company success & personal managing the stress of being an
satisfaction entrepreneur.
Build on Focus on using personal strengths enhances Working in an area of strength builds
Strengths & the ability to see them in others. This can self-efficacy, self-esteem, job
Minding your reinforce the delegation of tasks to those who satisfaction and loyalty. Who wants to
Core can do them better. leave such rewards?
Incompetence©
Appreciation Recognition that the function of others is Recognition for good performance
for others’ roles critical to success and that the pride of success enhances the perception of self-efficacy
is magnified by the organized cooperation of as well as pride
many
Teamwork is Recognizing that others are not merely Personal satisfaction from individual
Key extensions or duplications of your mind and and unique contribution to the
body parts. The enterprise is the composite outcome. Satisfaction and pride
of many hearts, hands, and minds. The resulting from the share of the profits
distribution of profits reflects your reflecting your true contribution.
understanding of this principle
Focus on Weighing progress by process and product The security of knowing what is
Outcomes and rather than personal investment expected and that some amount of
Process failure is expected relative to pursuit of
excellence
VI. References
Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Science of Learning Organizations,
Doubleday:New York, 1990.
Art Kliener, Climbing to Greatness with Jim Collins, Strategy and Business, Jan. 2002
Daniel Goleman, Annie McKee, Richard Boyatzis, Primal Leadership: Realizing the
Power of Emotional Intelligence, Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, 2002.
Robert Cooper, Ayman Sawaf, Executive EQ: Emotional Intelligence in Leadership
and Organizations, Putnam Group: New York, 1997.
Prasad Kaipa, Discontinuous Learning. Vinayaka Publishing: Palo Alto, 2002.
Jim Collins, Good to Great: Why some companies make the leap… and Others Don’t
New York: HarperBusiness, 2001.
Jim Collins, Jerry I. Porras. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies
New York: HarperBusiness, 1997.
Fortune Magazine “100 most admired companies”, 1998
Chris Argyris, HBR article on “Why smart people don’t learn” (reference)
Argyris, C., R. Putnam, et al. Action Science. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1985.
Howard Gardner Unschooled Mind New York: Basic Books, 1991.
www.teconline.com/publicsite/key_executive_skill_development.htm
http://www.teconline.com/publicsite/leadership.htm
Prasad Kaipa, Making Successful Transitions, www.selfcorp.com
Soft Skills Can Be Hard For Tech Managers - Inability To Deal With People Can
Short-Circuit A Career --Brian Caruso, Information Week, May 11, 1998, Issue:
681
Prasad Kaipa, Work-life balance: Ignore it at your own peril, www.selfcorp.com
Prasad Kaipa, Six Principles from Vedanta, The Art of Accomplishment,
www.mithya.com/learning/index.html
-----
Conclusion
Now that we have considered the Soft Skills, Building a Management Team, and
Managing Talent, let’s return to the end of the interview with Dr. Senge…
Kaipa: Many entrepreneurial companies that were built in the new economy
model were missing the theory of business. I once invested in a company that became
pretty big very quickly and it looked like they created a very successful company. The
founders moved out and started other stuff and suddenly the company collapsed and
disappeared. It has happened so many times recently that you wonder what the value
proposition was and what its distinctive source was.
Senge: I also think you can integrate what is implicit in doing in an
entrepreneurial venture into your knowing-doing gap. You should look seriously at your
doings like how you make decisions and what you spend your money on. If I were to be
an outsider looking at this, what would be the theory of business that I think you have?
Compare that to what you say your theory of business actually is. You will find very
interesting gaps between what you do and what you know about what you do. A slightly
different way of looking at knowing-doing gap. People always beat themselves up
because they don’t always do what they say they will do and what they should do. The
key is in finding out how to work with them. Why are we doing what we are doing? How
come we are not following what we know?
Kaipa: I think that is a very good point you are raising, Peter. I also say that
knowing-doing gap cannot be bridged directly. We have to understand why we do what
we do and why we say what we say. We have to get into what are we feeling when we
do what we do? What is the spirit behind our actions and who are we being?
These are important questions that throw light on knowing doing gap. I appreciate
what you say. From global perspective, do you see things that entrepreneurs should pay
attention to? Are there things that they traditionally ignore it but that they should pay
more attention to them?
Senge: Well, the obvious part of that is diversity. When you are an entrepreneur,
you network and connect with people who have a fair amount of commonness with you.
I think you get to be homogenous. I always think of companies like Shell. It is Dutch and
English. The core of the company is bicultural. There are not too many companies like
that. That type of multi-cultural, diverse team from the beginning would add a lot of
value. It prepares you as you grow. You deal with more and more of different kinds of
people, markets, customers, technologies. Having different points of view at the core
helps you significantly. It increases your net worth.
Kaipa: That is a critical point, Peter and in Silicon Valley, the potential exists for
such collaborations but does not happen very often.
Senge: Unilever is the same way. They are also Dutch and English. It is very
interesting to watch how they make decisions.
Kaipa: Great. With TIE, we are getting exposed to many others. Otherwise, we
create companies with others whom we are very comfortable with. There are many Indian
startups, Chinese startups etc. But rarely do Chinese and Indians create an
entrepreneurial venture together. It happens with Americans and Asians but still the
feeling is that Asians are good technical people and we need Americans for management.
We have to really look at our mental models because if we just keep doing what we are
doing, we keep getting what we are getting – a mixed success.
Do you see any Asian contribution or Indian contribution – their uniqueness that
we should pay attention to in building the companies that we build?
Senge: Over last 10-years, I have found tremendous alignment between the basic
ideas of organizational learning and Asian cultures. I think The Fifth Discipline has sold
more copies in China than any other country other than US. I think it is very popular in
India as well.
I think people appreciate the fact that you don’t have to follow the model of
western capitalism. It is very important for two reasons. One, if you are helping the
country, you will develop your own style. Number two, a new model is needed in the
world because the Western capitalism is the dead-end. You cannot grow the world
economy based on western capitalism because of its extreme levels of waste and its
disregard for human capital. I think there is enormous potential for the Asian Economies.
They will pioneer the kind of capitalism that respects natural capital, social capital and
human capital. I think, It could be to be a discontinuous big contribution of the 21st
century. I really believe that.
Kaipa: That is a great point, Peter. If I might follow up on that, you said western
capitalism disregards the human capital and Asian approaches enhance it. Can you say
how we can enhance human capital from either western or eastern perspective?
Senge: Of course. There are lots of things we can say about messages and
practices and we have already talked a bit about that. Lying behind all these tools and
messages is a matter of point of view. The reason I say that about Asian cultures they
have a different degree of integration about the spiritual perspective. In western cultures,
by and large, we have almost externalized spirituality. What I mean by that is that we
have to go to church to experience spirituality. In the extreme form, we do whatever we
do during the week and go to church to repent on Sunday. There is a lot of spirituality in
the western world, don’t get me wrong. But it is more on the periphery than central to
every day life. Especially Christianity is not based on every day development. It is based
on repentance and redemption.
Asian cultures have more integral concept of spirituality. It is more practice-
oriented approach. That means it is not about what you believe but it is what you
practice and it is a matter of discipline. What practices do you commit to on a day-by-
day or hour-by-hour basis? It gives a very different orientation. If you really experience
and you are continually cultivating your ability to experience spiritual orientation moment
by moment, you naturally relate to people. You naturally relate to all natural systems in
a very different way than if you are trying to add on the top of your every day way of
doing things a spiritual orientation. There is a possibility of contributing something very
different like that to business world.
That affects the ability to naturally gravitate to the primacy of human capital.
That really is the key. Are the living systems primary or secondary? If they are the
beginning to the orientation, if you naturally respect all life, and that is your starting
point, then everything is secondary. That would be very different approach.
Kaipa: Can you suggest some simple guidelines that entrepreneurs can take on and
keep in mind in developing human capital?
Senge: Let us start with something simple. What practice are you taking on to
guide your day-to-day life? It is not enough to say, I run, I go to gym because they are
physical exercises (that are important by themselves) but not sufficient in my opinion.
Start out with some spiritual exercises. Each individual has to choose his or her own
personal practice whether it is meditation, or tai chi or yoga; I don’t care. It is a discipline
that they have to cultivate. Secondly, there are team practices. Simple dialogue practice
like check-in. I think any of the mental model practices like acknowledging their left-hand
columns or where they are on the ladders of inference. Also, you can explore different
scenarios and spiritual development. You pick some and then maintain some practice.
Kaipa: Any cultural practices that you recommend?
Senge: Culture is a bit of problematic word. What I would focus on is very
particular settings like meetings. Develop skills that will help you run very productive
and focused meetings. It does not mean that they are always focused, but that there is
good balance between focus and divergence as well as between inquiry and task. Most
people hate going to meetings. They think meetings are a waste of time. If they can learn
how to run productive meetings, that would be good. Inquiry and collaborative learning,
practice in meetings.
Let us take a couple more examples. Performance reviews, let us try. How do we
go about reviewing performance? Do we do it the way it leads to learning? Are there
particular practices that allow performance to be reviewed in appreciative way? Similarly
budgets, how do you deal with them productively? My main point is don’t spend so
much time thinking about your culture. Take particular practices that are relevant
particular kind of work, so that they can impact the meetings, performance reviews, and
budgets. Take routine things that you have to do and make them learningful. Particular
practices for developing particular skills.
Kaipa: Any last comments that you want to make?
Senge: We need to recognize the importance of entrepreneurs to national
economies. So far, dealing with social and environmental problems has been central
government’s issues particularly in developed economies. These developed economies
are trying to work with developing economies. There is no hope for developing economies
without strong vital entrepreneurs. The problem of working with big multi-nationals is
that you develop the skills but you do not develop the infrastructure. I think there needs
to be a balance. There is nothing wrong with multi-nationals in the developed countries,
but they tend to squeeze out the entrepreneurial sector and that has been the pattern. I
was talking with a banker from a Nigeria. He pointed out to me that Shell is 60%, six-zero
percent of Nigerian economy. He founded a very successful bank in Nigeria. He was very
clear that there is no hope for Nigeria without an entrepreneurial sector. It is very
difficult. In all kinds of ways big companies make it very difficult for the entrepreneurs.
We have to learn to work with each other. That is the key. Entrepreneurs and big
businesses have to learn to work together.
Kaipa: Can you comment on the entrepreneurs and their role in building
sustainable enterprises of the future.
Senge: Now, I am assuming you are talking about natural capital and
environment when you use the word sustainability. Nobody has really looked at building
sustainable enterprises so far, at least thoroughly. Somebody in SFO is looking at criteria
for investors - very specific things in terms of social and environmental impact. Social
investment has been growing a lot. Long-term financial performance is not compromised.
It is about setting standards. Big businesses have to do that just like quality standards
have been set by them before. It is still a mystery why we drive these cars instead of cars
that give 200-miles a gallon. Only companies that are financially stable are doing hybrid
vehicles – Honda and Toyota. Many other companies cannot venture into working on
risky propositions.
My recommendations to entrepreneurs: form associations and develop various
kinds of networks. There is so much to learn here and the biggest problem for
entrepreneurs is isolation. This is the area there is so much to learn and it seems like a
natural place for share best practices. Don’t do it alone.
It is best if we learn together. It is something that you have to work together as
coalitions.
Kaipa: Thank you very much. We really appreciate your support and wonderful
comments. I am sure, readers will find them thought provoking and many of them are
actionable. Again, I appreciate this opportunity to talk with you during your very busy
time.