Carbohydrate Polymers: Julie Chandra C.S., Neena George, Sunil K. Narayanankutty
Carbohydrate Polymers: Julie Chandra C.S., Neena George, Sunil K. Narayanankutty
Carbohydrate Polymers: Julie Chandra C.S., Neena George, Sunil K. Narayanankutty
Carbohydrate Polymers
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/carbpol
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The isolation of cellulose nanofibres from arecanut husk was achieved by a chemo-mechanical method
Received 3 October 2015 thereby opening up a means for utilizing a waste product more effectively. The chemical processes
Received in revised form involved alkali treatment, acid hydrolysis, and bleaching. The mechanical fibrillation was performed via
22 December 2015
grinding and homogenization. The chemical constituents at different stages of treatment of fibres were
Accepted 10 January 2016
Available online 12 January 2016
analyzed according to the ASTM standards. Morphological characterization was done using the scanning
electron microscopy (SEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and transmission elec-
tron microscopy (TEM). The isolated nanofibers had an average diameter of below 10 nanometres and
Keywords:
Arecanut a very high aspect ratio in the range 120–150. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) showed
Cellulose nanofibrils the effective removal of the non cellulosic components. The crystallinity was increased with successive
Cellulose nanofibres treatments as shown by the X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). The TGA studies revealed a good thermal
Homogenization stability for the isolated nanofibres.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction & Takemura, 2010; Fahma, Iwamoto, Hori, Iwata, & Takemura,
2011; Khalil et al., 2014; Nazir, Wahjoedi, Yussof, & Abdullah,
With the development of nanotechnology, cellulose, one of the 2013) wood pulp (Siddiqui, Mills, Gardner, & Bousfield, 2011),
most ancient and abundant natural polymer on earth, attracts more kenaf, (Chan, Chia, Zakaria, Ahmad, & Dufresne, 2012; Jonoobi,
attention in a new form: ‘nanocellulose’. Based on the dimension Khazaeian, Tahir, Azry, & Oksman, 2011), bamboo (Yu et al., 2012),
and morphology, nanocellulose is grouped as cellulose nanocrystals flax (Khalil, Mahayuni, Rudi, Almulali, & Abdullah, 2012; Qua,
(CNC), cellulose nanofibers, (nanofibrillated cellulose) and bacte- Hornsby, Sharma, & Lyons, 2011) and rice straw (Lu & Hsieh,
rial cellulose or microbial cellulose (Dufresne, 2012; Klemm et al., 2012). Utilization of these lignocellulosic fibres increase rapidly
2011). Among these cellulose nanofibers have gained much atten- due to their abundance and ease of recyclability and attractive
tion from academic and industrial researchers, especially for the properties.
development of new bio nanocomposite materials (Charreau et al., Several methods have been reported for the extraction of
2013; Khalil et al., 2014; Missoum, Belgacem, & Bras, 2013; Song, nanocellulose fibres from these renewable sources. A chemo-
Winter, Bujanovic, & Amidon, 2014). Cellulose nanofibre compos- mechanical method was used by Alemdar et al. for the extraction
ites find applications in many areas such as printed and flexible of cellulose nanofibres from the agricultural residues such as
electronics films and coatings for packaging, drug delivery, water wheat straw and soy hulls for use as reinforcement in biocompos-
treatment, optical media, barrier films, etc. The use of nanocel- ites. (Alemdar & Sain, 2008). They obtained cellulose nanofibres
lulose based composites in automotive and building products is with 10–80 nm diameter and 35% improvement in crystallinity
increasing. Over the years, numerous studies have been carried out for wheat straw nanofibres and only 16% for soyhull nanofi-
for the extraction of cellulose nanofibres from various cellulosic bres. Farah Fahma and co-workers extracted cellulose nanofibers
sources, such as oil palm biomass (Fahma, Iwamoto, Hori, Iwata, by hydrolysing oil palm empty fruit bunch with sulphuric acid
hydrolysis (Fahma et al., 2010). They observed a decrease of crys-
tallinity and DP with sulphuric acid treatment time. Fatah et al.
∗ Corresponding author. explored a chemo-mechanical technique to isolate cellulose nanofi-
E-mail address: [email protected] (S.K. Narayanankutty). bres from oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) and succeeded in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.015
0144-8617/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
J.C. C.S. et al. / Carbohydrate Polymers 142 (2016) 158–166 159
3.4. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) Debye–Scherrer Equation (Amiralian, Annamalai, Memmott, &
Martin, 2015).
The nanocellulose dispersion in the bleached as well as homog-
k
enized state was analyzed by Field Emission Scanning Electron D=
Microscopy using “NOVA NANO SEM 450 FE-SEM” instrument. A ˇCos
drop of the dispersion was placed on the carbon tape and allowed where k is the shape factor and is approximately = 0.89, is the
water to evaporate completely. The specimen was sputter coated wave length of the radiation (0.154 nm), ˇ is the line width in radi-
with gold (10 nm thickness) to suppress charging inside the FESEM. ans at half the maximum intensity of I200 to which the background
and the amorphous component have been subtracted, and is the
3.5. Transmission electron microscopy analysis (TEM) scattering angle of the peak (2 0 0).
Transmission electron micrographs of cellulose fibres were 3.7. Dynamic light scattering
made on a JOEL 2100 microscope. The nanofibrils were deposited
from an aqueous dilute dispersion on a micro grid covered with a The particle size of nanocellulose dispersion in water was
thin carbon film and allowed to dry at room temperature for 24 h. recorded by dynamic light scattering (DLS) system using Microtrac
The deposited fibres were subsequently stained with a 2% uranyl Nanotrac Wave. The technique is also referred as photon correlation
acetate solution to enhance the microscopic resolution. The sample spectroscopy (PCS) in which particle size is determined by measur-
was then dried before TEM analysis. ing the random changes in the intensity of light scattered from a
suspension or solution. The sample is illuminated by a laser beam
3.6. X-ray diffraction technique (XRD) followed by detection of the resultant fluctuations of the scattered
light at a known scattering angle by a fast photon detector.
XRD patterns of the fibres at different stages were obtained
using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance X-ray powder diffractometer 3.8. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
equipped with Cu K␣ radiation at the operating voltage and cur-
rent of 40 kV and 35 mA respectively. The diffraction intensities Thermogravimetric analysis of the fibres was carried out on
were recorded between 3 and 80◦ (2 angle range) at increments TA Instruments TGA Q50 with a heating rate of 20 ◦ C/min. About
of 0.02◦ at a wavelength of 1.541 Å. 5–8 mg of dried samples were heated from room temperature to
The crystallinity index was calculated using the Segal’s method 600 ◦ C under nitrogen atmosphere.
as given below (Segal, Creely, Martin, & Conrad, 1959).
I − Iam
4. Results and discussion
200
Crystallinity index, ICr = × 100
I200
4.1. Chemical composition
where I200 is the maximum intensity of diffraction at 200 peak
(2 = 22.6◦ ) and Iam is the intensity of diffraction at 2 = 18◦ . I200 The chemical constitution of the raw arecanut husk fibre
represents both crystalline and amorphous regions of the material determined is given in Table 1. The raw fibre contains 34.18 wt% cel-
whereas Iam represents only the amorphous regions. lulose, 20.83 wt% hemicelluloses, 31.6 wt% lignin, low percentage of
Further the effect of different treatments on the crystalline pectin, ash and about 10.95 wt% of moisture content. From the liter-
structure of fibres can be evaluated by another parameter, ature reports, it is clear that the cellulose content of arecanut husk
the mean size of crystalline regions, and was calculated using fibre is comparable with that of some of the agricultural residues
J.C. C.S. et al. / Carbohydrate Polymers 142 (2016) 158–166 161
Table 1
Compositional analysis of the raw arecanut husk fibre. Bleached
Components Content % (w/w)
␣-Cellulose 34.18
Hemicellulose 20.83 1426
Lignin 31.60
Moisture 10.95 897
1155
Pectin 1.26
Ash 2.34
Acid treated 996
3370
Table 2
Chemical composition at each stage.
Transmittance (a.u)
(%, w/w)
such as wheat straw (39%), (Sun, Xu, Sun, Fowler, & Baird, 2005), rice
straw (38%), (Hessien, Rashad, Zaky, Abdel-Aal, & El-Barawy, 2009),
rice husk (35 wt%), (Johar, Ahmad, & Dufresne, 2012), hardwood
(31–64%) and softwood (30–60%) (Jawaid & Khalil, 2011) where as
a lower percentage of cellulose is seen in orange peels (13.6 wt%), 2907
1509
1734
lemon peels (12.7 wt%) and algae biomass (7.1 wt%), etc. (Ververis
1254
3364 1049
et al., 2007). Table 2 describes the chemical composition of fibres
at different stages of processing. It is found that the raw fibre has 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
the lowest percentage of cellulose content and highest percentage -1
of non-cellulosic components such as hemicellulose and lignin. The Wave numbers cm
purpose of pre-treatment of fibres is to remove the non cellulosic
Fig. 2. FT-IR spectra of fibres at various stages of processing.
components and thus the embedded cellulose get exposed. When
the fibres are subjected to alkaline treatment, the hemicellulose
and lignin are removed. This is due to the breakdown of ether link- et al., 2013). The highest percentage of cellulose content is observed
ages between hemicelluloses and lignin (Xiao, Sun, & Sun, 2001). after the bleaching process and since the cellulose contains O H
The hemicellulose content is decreased from 20.83% to 4.78% and groups the moisture content increases slightly.
the lignin content from 31.65 to 16.85% on two successive alkali
treatments. It is reported that the alkali treatment is an efficient 4.2. Fourier transform infra red spectroscopy (FT-IR)
method for removing the non cellulosic components like hemicel-
luloses, pectin and lignin (De Rodriguez, Thielemans, & Dufresne, The FT-IR spectroscopy was done for studying the changes in
2006; Dufresne, Cavaillé, & Vignon, 1998). The crystalline regions the chemical structures after the various treatments of fibres. FT-
of the cellulose are compact and resist the penetration of chemi- IR spectra of the raw, alkali treated, acid hydrolysed and bleached
cals. The shear forces developed in grinding can lead to fibrillation fibres are shown in Fig. 2. The FT-IR spectrum shows major absorp-
by breaking down of hydrogen bond of cell wall structure. This also tions corresponding cellulose and lignin functional groups. As
helps further removal of cementing materials from the interior by we have discussed earlier, the arecanut husk fibre consists of
the second time chemical treatment. The repeated acid hydrolysis mainly cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. Alkanes, esters, aro-
of fibres helps in the individualization of microfibrils from the cell matics, ketones and alcohols, with different oxygen-containing
wall. The remaining hemicelluloses and lignin can be removed by functional groups are the main functional groups present in these
bleaching with NaClO2 . When lignin reacts with NaClO2 , an oxida- three materials. Disappearance of some peaks in the spectra indi-
tive fragmentation takes place and some of the lignin will form cates the removal of some of the components after the chemical
lignin chloride which is easily dissolvable. From raw to bleached treatments of the fibre. There are two main absorption regions
fibres it is observed that the percentage of cellulose component observed for all the fibres, one at low wavelength region from 600
increased drastically to 85.47% as it is exposed by the removal to 1750 cm−1 and other at high wavelength region between 2800
of non-cellulosic components. The yield of nanocellulose obtained and 3400 cm−1 . The absorption bands in the range 3348–3404 cm−1
with respect to the initial amount of arecanut husk fibres is found and 2890–2980 cm−1 found in the spectra of all the fibres represent
to be about 22–26%. the O H stretching vibrations of the hydrogen bonded hydroxyl
Moisture content at each stage is also clear from Table 2. The raw groups and the C H groups of cellulose respectively (Avolio et al.,
fibre shows moisture content of 10.95%. When the fibre is subjected 2012; Jonoobi et al., 2011). The peaks at 1254, 1508, 1604 cm−1
to alkali treatment, the moisture content rises. Then it decreases found in the spectrum of raw fibre correspond to the aromatic
and finally increases slightly. Alkali exposure induces swelling of skeletal vibrations of lignin (Morán, Alvarez, Cyras, & Vázquez,
the fibres which promotes moisture absorption. The swelling of 2008). The appearance of a significant peak at 1730 cm−1 also in
fibres facilitates the breakdown during acid hydrolysis (Abraham the raw fibre is due to the acetic and uronic ester groups of the
162 J.C. C.S. et al. / Carbohydrate Polymers 142 (2016) 158–166
Fig. 3. SEM images of (A) raw fibre, (B) alkali treated fibre, (C) acid treated fibre, (D) alkali treated pulp, (E) acid treated pulp and (F) bleached pulp.
J.C. C.S. et al. / Carbohydrate Polymers 142 (2016) 158–166 163
Fig. 4. FESEM images of (A) bleached pulp (high magnified image in the inset) and (B) homogenized pulp.
in lower moisture absorption (Abraham et al., 2013; Sun et al., FESEM images validate the effective disintegration of microfibrils
2005). by bleaching. A high magnification image of bleached fibre with a
diameter of around 11 nm is shown in the inset of Fig. 4(A). Homog-
enization results in the formation of nanofibres, confirmed by the
4.3. Scanning electron microscopy analysis (SEM)
entangled network of fibres of nano dimension as seen in the FE-
SEM image (Fig. 4(B)). As can be seen, most of the fibres have a
The morphology and dimension of the fibres are believed to be
diameter in the range 3–5 nm. Thus the morphological investiga-
affected by the chemo-mechanical treatment. Fig. 3 show the SEM
tion supports the evidence of the isolation of cellulose nanofibres
images of the fibres at different stages of processing. Fig. 3(A) shows
from arecanut husk and highlighting the success of the chemo-
the SEM image of the raw fibre. The surface of the raw fibre seems
mechanical treatment employed.
uneven due to the presence of binding materials like hemicellu-
loses, lignin, pectin, etc. These binding materials are removed and
thereby fibres get detached from the surface by the alkali treat- 4.5. Transmission electron microscopy analysis
ment (Fig. 3(B)). Fig. 3(C) clearly shows the defibrillation of fibres
occurring during acid hydrolysis. TEM micrographs of the cellulosic nanofibrils obtained after
Fig. 3(D) and (E) represent the alkali treated and acid treated homogenization are shown in Fig. 5. It clearly supports the evidence
fibre, respectively after mechanical grinding. The surface rough- of isolation of cellulose nanofibrils from arecanut husk. Long fibrils
ness shown in the image indicates the removal of the cementing with diameter in the nanometer range (1–10 nm) are observed from
materials (Chan et al., 2012). Furthermore the mechanical grind- the figure. The aspect ratio (length to diameter ratio) plays a major
ing increases the surface area and facilitates the ease of access of role in determining the reinforcing capability of nanofibres. The
alkali and acid into the interior part of the fibre. This contributes the aspect ratio of the nanofibrils is measured using image processing
effective defibrillation which is clearly demonstrated in the figure. software image J. Most of the fibres display a very high aspect ratio
As seen in the figures the diameter is reduced from 15 to 7 m. in the range of (120–150). This value is rather high compared to one
Bleaching with NaClO2 after the acid hydrolysis helps to elim- reported for cellulose nanofibrils extracted from other sources such
inate the rest of lignin and further disintegration leading to the as coconut husk (60) (Rosa et al., 2010) or wheat straw (90–110)
development of cellulose micro fibrils. This is clearly observed from (Alemdar & Sain, 2008).
Fig. 3(F). The bleached pulp exhibits smoother and uniform fibril
surface, confirming the removal of non cellulosic components.
4.6. X-ray diffraction analysis
4.4. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) Fig. 6 represents the XRD patterns of the raw fibre and the
chemo-mechanically treated fibres. The crystalline structure of cel-
Fig. 4(A) and (B) show the FESEM images of bleached pulp lulose can be well studied by the XRD patterns. Two characteristics
and cellulose nanofibrils after homogenization respectively. The peaks at around 22◦ and 15◦ found in all the diffractograms are
1200
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Acknowledgement
References
Abraham, E., Deepa, B., Pothen, L. A., Cintil, J., Thomas, S., John, M. J., et al. (2013).
Environmental friendly method for the extraction of coir fibre and isolation of
nanofibre. Carbohydrate Polymers, 92(2), 1477–1483.
Alemdar, A., & Sain, M. (2008). Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from
agricultural residues – Wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresource Technology,
99(6), 1664–1671.
Amiralian, N., Annamalai, P. K., Memmott, P., & Martin, D. J. (2015). Isolation of
cellulose nanofibrils from Triodia pungens via different mechanical methods.
Cellulose, 22(4), 2483–2498.
Avolio, R., Bonadies, I., Capitani, D., Errico, M. E., Gentile, G., & Avella, M. (2012). A
multitechnique approach to assess the effect of ball milling on cellulose.
Carbohydrate Polymers, 87(1), 265–273.
Bipinbal, P. K. (2012). Preparation and Characterization of Micro and Nano Fiber
Fig. 8. (A) and (B) TG and DTG curves of fibres at various stages of treatment. Reinforced Natural Rubber Composites by Latex Stage Processing Ph.D. Thesis.
Cochin University of Science and Technology.
Boldizar, A., Klason, C., Kubat, J., Näslund, P., & Saha, P. (1987). Prehydrolyzed
free radicals and may initiate the degradation easily. The higher cellulose as reinforcing filler for thermoplastics. International Journal of
Polymeric Materials, 11(4), 229–262.
degradation onset temperature after the chemo-mechanical treat- Brebu, M., & Vasile, C. (2010). Thermal degradation of lignin—A review. Cellulose
ment reveals the improved thermal behaviour of fibres. The major Chemistry & Technology, 44(9), 353.
degradation temperature for raw fibre, bleached and homogenized Chan, H. C., Chia, C. H., Zakaria, S., Ahmad, I., & Dufresne, A. (2012). Production and
characterisation of cellulose and nano-crystalline cellulose from kenaf core
occurs at 347 ◦ C, 369 ◦ C and 361 ◦ C respectively, due to the ther- wood. BioResources, 8(1), 785–794.
mal decomposition of cellulose. This additional thermal stability is Charreau, H., L Foresti, M., & Vázquez, A. (2013). Nanocellulose patents trends: A
associated with the crystallinity of fibres which is enhanced by the comprehensive review on patents on cellulose nanocrystals, microfibrillated
and bacterial cellulose. Recent Patents on Nanotechnology, 7(1), 56–80.
chemo-mechanical method. Chen, W., Yu, H., Liu, Y., Hai, Y., Zhang, M., & Chen, P. (2011). Isolation and
The carbonaceous residues obtained at 500 ◦ C for raw fibre is characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a
25% whereas relatively a low amount of residue (15%) is remained chemical-ultrasonic process. Cellulose, 18(2), 433–442.
Cherian, B. M., Pothan, L. A., Nguyen-Chung, T., Mennig, G., Kottaisamy, M., &
for the homogenized nanocellulose at the same temperature.
Thomas, S. (2008). A novel method for the synthesis of cellulose nanofibril
According to the literature, the higher amount of residue in the whiskers from banana fibers and characterization. Journal of Agricultural and
raw fibre compared to the respective amounts in the chemo- Food Chemistry, 56(14), 5617–5627.
Chirayil, C. J., Joy, J., Mathew, L., Mozetic, M., Koetz, J., & Thomas, S. (2014). Isolation
mechanically treated ones can be attributed to the presence of ash,
and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from Helicteres isora plant.
lignin, which have very low degradation rates (Morán et al., 2008; Industrial Crops and Products, 59, 27–34.
Yang, Yan, Chen, Lee, & Zheng, 2007). De Rodriguez, N. L. G., Thielemans, W., & Dufresne, A. (2006). Sisal cellulose
whiskers reinforced polyvinyl acetate nanocomposites. Cellulose, 13(3),
261–270.
5. Conclusion de Souza Lima, M. M., & Borsali, R. (2004). Rodlike cellulose microcrystals:
Structure, properties, and applications. Macromolecular Rapid Communications,
25(7), 771–787.
The successful isolation of cellulose nanofibrils from arecanut
Dufresne, A. (2012). Nanocellulose: From nature to high performance tailored
husk gives an opportunity for the effective utilization of a natural materials. Walter de Gruyter.
product that would otherwise go as waste. The chemical anal- Dufresne, A., Cavaillé, J. Y., & Vignon, M. R. (1998). Mechanical behavior of sheets
prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. Journal of Applied Polymer
ysis showed that the chemical treatments applied can remove
Science, 64(6), 1185–1194.
the unwanted noncellulosic materials from the raw fibre and the Fahma, F., Iwamoto, S., Hori, N., Iwata, T., & Takemura, A. (2010). Isolation,
mechanical methods including grinding and homogenization helps preparation, and characterization of nanofibers from oil palm
in the individualization of the fibres to nano dimension. After the empty-fruit-bunch (OPEFB). Cellulose, 17(5), 977–985.
Fahma, F., Iwamoto, S., Hori, N., Iwata, T., & Takemura, A. (2011). Effect of
final stage of treatment, the product obtained had 85.47% cellu- pre-acid-hydrolysis treatment on morphology and properties of cellulose
lose content. FT-IR results revealed the removal of non cellulosic nanowhiskers from coconut husk. Cellulose, 18(2), 443–450.
166 J.C. C.S. et al. / Carbohydrate Polymers 142 (2016) 158–166
Fan, M., Dai, D., & Huang, B. (2012). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for Nishiyama, Y. (2009). Structure and properties of the cellulose microfibril. Journal
natural fibres. In Fourier transform – Materials analysis. InTech. of Wood Science, 55(4), 241–249.
Fatah, I. Y. A., Khalil, H. P. S., Hossain, M. S., Aziz, A. A., Davoudpour, Y., Dungani, R., Park, S., Baker, J. O., Himmel, M. E., Parilla, P. A., & Johnson, D. K. (2010). Research
et al. (2014). Exploration of a chemo-mechanical technique for the isolation of cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on
nanofibrillated cellulosic fiber from oil palm empty fruit bunch as a reinforcing interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology Biofuels, 3(10).
agent in composites materials. Polymers, 6(10), 2611–2624. Qua, E. H., Hornsby, P. R., Sharma, H. S. S., & Lyons, G. (2011). Preparation and
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010). Cellulose nanocrystals: Chemistry, characterisation of cellulose nanofibres. Journal of Materials Science, 46(18),
self-assembly, and applications. Chemical Reviews, 110(6), 3479–3500. 6029–6045.
Hessien, M. M., Rashad, M. M., Zaky, R. R., Abdel-Aal, E. A., & El-Barawy, K. A. Rosa, M. F., Medeiros, E. S., Malmonge, J. A., Gregorski, K. S., Wood, D. F., Mattoso, L.
(2009). Controlling the synthesis conditions for silica nanosphere from H. C., et al. (2010). Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: Effect of
semi-burned rice straw. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 162(1), 14–21. preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behaviour.
Jawaid, M., & Khalil, H. P. S. (2011). Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer Carbohydrate Polymers, 81(1), 83–92.
hybrid composites: A Review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86, 1–18. Saito, T., Hirota, M., Tamura, N., Kimura, S., Fukuzumi, H., Heux, L., et al. (2009).
Johar, N., Ahmad, I., & Dufresne, A. (2012). Extraction, preparation and Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface
characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Industrial carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions.
Crops and Products, 37(1), 93–99. Biomacromolecules, 10(7), 1992–1996.
Jonoobi, M., Khazaeian, A., Tahir, P. M., Azry, S. S., & Oksman, K. (2011). Segal, L. G. J. M. A., Creely, J. J., Martin, A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959). An empirical
Characteristics of cellulose nanofibers isolated from rubberwood and empty method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the
fruit bunches of oil palm using chemo-mechanical process. Cellulose, 18(4), X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal, 29(10), 786–794.
1085–1095. Siddiqui, N., Mills, R. H., Gardner, D. J., & Bousfield, D. (2011). Production and
Kanoth, B. P., Thomas, T., Joseph, J. M., Kuthirummal, N., & Narayanankutty, S. K. characterization of cellulose nanofibers from wood pulp. Journal of Adhesion
(2015). A cost-effective method to prepare cellulose nanofiber from coir. Science and Technology, 25(6–7), 709–721.
Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine, 7(6), 492–497. Song, Q., Winter, W. T., Bujanovic, B. M., & Amidon, T. E. (2014). Nanofibrillated
Khalil, H. A., Davoudpour, Y., Islam, M. N., Mustapha, A., Sudesh, K., Dungani, R., cellulose (NFC): A high-value co-product that improves the economics of
et al. (2014). Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using cellulosic ethanol production. Energies, 7(2), 607–618.
various mechanical processes: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 99, 649–665. Srinivasa, C. V., Arifulla, A., Goutham, N., Santhosh, T., Jaeethendra, H. J., Ravikumar,
Khalil, H. A., Mahayuni, A. R., Rudi, D., Almulali, M. Z., & Abdullah, C. K. (2012). R. B., et al. (2011). Static bending and impact behaviour of areca fibers
Characterization of various organic waste nanofillers obtained from oil palm composites. Materials & Design, 32(4), 2469–2475.
ash. BioResources, 7(4), 5771–5780. Srinivasa, C. V., & Bharath, K. N. (2011). Impact and hardness properties of areca
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., et al. (2011). fiber-epoxy reinforced composites. Journal of Materials and Environmental
Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angewandte Chemie Science, 2, 351–356.
International Edition, 50(24), 5438–5466. Sun, X. F., Xu, F., Sun, R. C., Fowler, P., & Baird, M. S. (2005). Characteristics of
Klemm, D., Schumann, D., Kramer, F., Hebler, N., Hornung, M., & Marsch, S. (2006). degraded cellulose obtained from steam-exploded wheat straw. Carbohydrate
Nanocelluloses as innovative polymers in research and application. Advanced Research, 340(1), 97–106.
Polymer Science, 205, 49–96. Velazquez, G., Herrera-Gómez, A., & Martın-Polo, M. O. (2003). Identification of
Lu, P., & Hsieh, Y. L. (2012). Preparation and characterization of cellulose bound water through infrared spectroscopy in methylcellulose. Journal of Food
nanocrystals from rice straw. Carbohydrate Polymers, 87(1), 564–573. Engineering, 59(1), 79–84.
Mandal, A., & Chakrabarty, D. (2011). Isolation of nanocellulose from waste Ververis, C., Georghiou, K., Danielidis, D., Hatzinikolaou, D. G., Santas, P., Santas, R.,
sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and its characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86(3), et al. (2007). Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash content of some organic
1291–1299. materials and their suitability for use as paper pulp supplements. Bioresource
Marchessault, R. H. (1962). Application of infra-red spectroscopy to cellulose and Technology, 98(2), 296–301.
wood polysaccharides. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 5(1–2), 107–130. Wise, L. E., Murphy, M., & D’Addieco, A. A. (1946). Paper Trade Journal, 122, 35.
Missoum, K., Belgacem, M. N., & Bras, J. (2013). Nanofibrillated cellulose surface Xiao, B., Sun, X., & Sun, R. (2001). Chemical, structural, and thermal
modification: A review. Materials, 6(5), 1745–1766. characterizations of alkali-soluble lignins and hemicelluloses, and cellulose
Morán, J. I., Alvarez, V. A., Cyras, V. P., & Vázquez, A. (2008). Extraction of cellulose from maize stems, rye straw, and rice straw. Polymer Degradation and Stability,
and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose, 15(1), 149–159. 74(2), 307–319.
Nacos, M. K., Katapodis, P., Pappas, C., Daferera, D., Tarantilis, P. A., Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., & Zheng, C. (2007). Characteristics of
Christakopoulos, P., et al. (2006). Kenaf xylan – A source of biologically active hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 86(12), 1781–1788.
acidic oligosaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers, 66(1), 126–134. Yu, M., Yang, R., Huang, L., Cao, X., Yang, F., & Liu, D. (2012). Preparation and
Nazir, M. S., Wahjoedi, B. A., Yussof, A. W., & Abdullah, M. A. (2013). Eco-friendly characterization of bamboo nanocrystalline cellulose. BioResources, 7(2),
extraction and characterization of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunches. 1802–1812.
BioResources, 8(2), 2161–2172.