Toilet Training and Influencing Factors That Affect Initiation and Duration of Training: A Cross Sectional Study
Toilet Training and Influencing Factors That Affect Initiation and Duration of Training: A Cross Sectional Study
Toilet Training and Influencing Factors That Affect Initiation and Duration of Training: A Cross Sectional Study
Received 2016 November 10; Revised 2017 February 01; Accepted 2017 April 07.
Abstract
Objectives: Aim of this study was to determine the pattern of toilet training (TT) in Jordan, the factors that are related to the initia-
tion age, duration and the methods of training used among different sociocultural groups.
Methods: Mothers of 1257 children attending pediatric clinics at Jordan University Hospital were directly interviewed.
Results: Mean initiation and completion ages were 22.5 ± 6.50 and 26.48 ± 9.37 months respectively. Families living in urban settle-
ment, first child in family, child-oriented approach, working mothers and mothers with higher level of education started training
later. The duration of toilet training was 5.80 ± 8.06 weeks and it was shorter in families who used the child-oriented approach.
Intensive method was used in 59.4%, child-oriented in 40.6%. Young mothers used more frequently the intensive method. Constipa-
tion and stool toilet refusal developed in 15.4% and 15.1% respectively and there was a significant association between constipation
and older age of starting toilet training.
Conclusions: Intensive method of training is more popular in our country and the initiation and completion age are earlier than
in other countries. The age of initiation may be increased as parents are better educated and a child-oriented approach becomes
more popular than the intensive approach.
Copyright © 2017, Iranian Journal of Pediatrics. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the
original work is properly cited.
Hanna Albaramki J et al.
outpatient pediatric clinics at Jordan University Hospital Table 1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Patients
by a trained research assistant. A total of 1256 mothers were
interviewed. Characteristic No. (%)
The data included: current age; gender; season of TT; Child’s gender
age at starting the training; the duration needed; age
Female 600 (47.7)
of complete-day control and night-time control; ways of
Male 657(52.3)
training used as “rewarding”, “modeling”, “punishment”,
“telling stories” or regularly putting the child on the toi- Settlement
let; type of toilet (regular or potty) and presence of fam- Rural 136 (10.8)
ily support. Two methods of TT were assessed. The child- Urban 1121 (89.2)
oriented method was defined when the parents started TT
Mothers’ level of education
after the child showed certain readiness signs, and the in-
tensive method where parents started TT because they be- School 565 (44.9)
lieved that the age was appropriate without considering College 144 (11.5)
how much the child was ready. Other socio-demographical University 548 (43.6)
information included mother’s age, her level of education, Maternal status
number of siblings, maternal status (working or house-
Housewife 831 (66.1)
wife), settlement and person who gave TT. The problems
encountered during training as constipation and stool toi- Working mother 426 (33.9)
2.1. Statistics
3.2. Initiation and Completion of Toilet Training
Data were collected, coded and entered into Statisti- The mean age of initiation of TT was 22.50 ± 6.50
cal Package for Social Science (SPSS version 16, SPSS Inc, (range 9 - 48) months. 181 (14.4%) of children had training
Chicago, IL, USA). Data were summarized as counts and per- under 18 months, 835 (66.4%) between 18 and 30 months
centages for categorical data and as means and standard and 241 (19.2%) of them over 30 months. The mean comple-
deviation (SD) for continuous data. Normality of data was tion age of daytime TT was 23.80 ± 6.70 months. Mean du-
assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro Wilk tests. ration of daytime TT was 5.80 ± 8.06 (range 1 - 72) weeks.
Homogeneity of variance was assessed by Levene’s test. Mean age of night time-control was 26.48 ± 9.37
Data of continuous nature among different groups months.
were compared by parametric inferential statistics (t- There was a statistically significant weak negative rela-
test and ANOVA) or non-parametric inferential statistics tionship between age of initiation and duration of train-
(Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis) as applicable. Alter- ing (P < 0.0001, r = -0.128). The duration of toilet training
natively, data of categorical nature were compared among was statistically longer in families who started TT under 18
different groups by chi square or Fisher exact test as appro- months, compared to families who started TT between 18 -
priate. Correlation was assessed by Pearson or Spearman 30 months (7.6 ± 8.40 vs 5.50 ± 7.70 weeks, P < 0.007).
correlation tests. Statistical significance was considered as In univariate analysis, the factors that were signifi-
P < 0.05. cantly associated with later initiation and completion age
were presence of family support, first child, urban settle-
ment, university degree for the mother’s education, work-
3. Results
ing mother, child-oriented method for training, use of
punishment as a way of training (Table 2). There was no
3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics (Table 1)
correlation between mothers’ age, child’s gender, use of
Mean current age was 5.4 ± 1.9 years. 55.4% of children potty and initiation age. The only factor that affected sig-
were under 5 years old. Average age of mothers was 30.1 ± nificantly the duration of training was the child-oriented
12.3 years. Average number of siblings was 1.7 ± 1.6. method.
Table 2. Factors Associated with Initiation and Completion and Duration of Toilet Traininga
Factors Associated with Training (n = Initiation Age, mo Completion Age, mo Duration of TT, w
1257)
Child rank Not first child (840) 22.1 ± 6.5 23.4 ± 6.7 5.8 ± 7.9
Reason for training Child oriented (510) 23.2 ± 6.7 24.2±6.9 4.9 ± 6.9
Regular taking toilet (441) 21.8 ± 6.4 23.1 ± 6.6b 5.9 ± 8.3
3.3. Toilet Training Methods No correlation was found between children’s gender, liv-
Intensive method was used in 747 (59.4%) children, ing area, maternal education or occupation and method of
while child-oriented method was adopted in 510 (40.6%) training.
cases. Mothers who used intensive approach had a statis- Regular visits to toilet by observing the child and tak-
tically significant lower age than mothers who used child- ing him to toilet was the most commonly (35.1%) used way.
oriented method (29.4 ± 5.3 vs. 30.1 ± 18.2 years, P = 0.008). Modeling an older sibling or parent was seen in 27%, telling
stories in 15.8%, rewarding as buying gifts or chocolate in working mothers, use of punishment as a way of training
12.4%, punishment methods such as scolding and spanking were associated with a later initiation and completion age.
in 9.6%. There was no correlation between mother age, gen- Koc et al. (9) also reported that higher maternal education,
der and ways of training. However mothers with more sib- working mothers, people living in cities start TT later than
lings used modeling more (P < 0.0001). others. Tahran et al. (10) also found that toilet training age
Potty training was used by 404 (32.1%) of cases and increased as maternal education level increased.
mean age of transfer to toilet seat was 16.3 ± 20.29 weeks. Intensive method was used more frequently in our
study and that is similar to a study in Iran, but different
3.4. Problems Encountered than in Belgium where 61.9% start training in response
Constipation was present in 15.4%, stool toilet refusal to signals from the child (8). No significant differences
in 15.1%. There was a significant association between pres- were found between the child-oriented and the intensive
ence of constipation and older age of starting TT (age of method of learning in terms of efficacy and adverse events
initiation 23.70 ± 7.3 vs 22.2 ± 6.6, P = 0.033). There was (15). In another review on TT, it was difficult to draw def-
no correlation between gender, duration of TT, or method inite conclusions on the superiority of one method over
adopted and development of constipation. Constipation the other (16). However, American academy of pediatrics
was more frequently in children of parents who used pun- guidelines recommend child-oriented approach (1).
ishment [OR (95%CI) = 3.2 (2 - 5), P = 0.006]. In our study problems as constipation occurred in
15.4%, stool toilet refusal in 15.4% and that is slightly lower
than described in other studies (13, 17).
4. Discussion
We found a correlation between presence of constipa-
tion and later age of starting training and Blum et al. (13)
Toilet training is an important but not well studied
found that the presence of constipation and stool toilet re-
subject in Jordan. This is the first study conducted on Jor-
fusal was associated with a later initiation age of TT. Other
danian children. The mean initiation age was 22.5 ± 6.5
studies have also found a correlation between stool toilet
months, which is similar to that in Turkish children (9,
refusal and late age of starting TT (13, 17).
10), but lower than other countries (8, 12) where the av-
erage age was 27.5 months (8). Possible explanations for The main limitation of the study was its cross sectional
this could be that the intensive method that is associated design as the collected data depended on the mother’s
with significantly earlier age of training was used more fre- statement about her child’s toilet training making the data
quently than the child-oriented method. Additionally, in subject to recall bias especially in children above 5 years.
our study 66.5% of mothers were housewives in compar- We recommend conducting a prospective cohort study in
ison to other studies (8) with a later initiation age where future and addressing other problems such as daytime
72.2% mothers were working mothers. Non-working moth- wetting.
ers have a significantly earlier initiation age than working
mothers. Completion age similar to initiation age in our
population was also earlier than that in Western societies 4.1. Conclusions
(13).
In our study girls started and finished training earlier
than boys as described in literature (5, 6). Girls show readi- In Jordan which is a developing country, intensive
ness signs earlier than boys (5) and they are influenced by method is more commonly used and both the initiation
socialization and desire to please parents, whereas boys de- and completion age of toilet training begin earlier than
pend on physiologic maturation (14), but that was not sta- those in developed countries.
tistically significant as also seen in other studies (9, 10). Du- Housewives, people living in rural areas, mothers with
ration of daytime TT in our study was significantly shorter a lower level of education, mothers who used the inten-
than in other studies; 5.8 ± 8.06 weeks vs 4.15 ± 4.48 sive method, start training earlier. Pediatricians and fam-
months (9) and there was a negative correlation between ily practitioners should provide proper counseling to the
age of initiation and duration implying that starting early mothers regarding the appropriate age and method of
may take longer time and that is also reported in other training. The use of the child-oriented method should be
studies (9, 12). encouraged for this will lead to a later initiation age and
In our study it was found that the presence of fam- shorter duration of toilet training. Other ways of training
ily support, first child rank, urban settlement, university as rewarding, and avoiding of punishment should also be
degree for the mother education, child oriented method, encouraged.
Acknowledgments beliefs and attitudes of parents concerning TT. J Child Health Care.
2015;19(2):265–74. doi: 10.1177/1367493513508232. [PubMed: 24270991].
The authors acknowledge the dean of academic re- 9. Koc I, Camurdan AD, Beyazova U, Ilhan MN, Sahin F. Toilet training
in Turkey: the factors that affect timing and duration in different
search at the University of Jordan.
sociocultural groups. Child Care Health Dev. 2008;34(4):475–81. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00829.x. [PubMed: 18485025].
10. Tarhan H, Cakmak O, Akarken I, Ekin RG, Un S, Uzelli D, et al. Toilet
References training age and influencing factors: a multicenter study. Turk J Pe-
diatr. 2015;57(2):172–6. [PubMed: 26690599].
1. Stadtler AC, Gorski PA, Brazelton TB. Toilet training methods, clini-
11. Hooman N, Safaii A, Valavi E, Amini-Alavijeh Z. Toilet training in Ira-
cal interventions, and recommendations. American Academy of Pe-
nian children: a cross-sectional study. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(2):154–8.
diatrics. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 2):1359–68. [PubMed: 10353954].
[PubMed: 23724175].
2. Brazelton TB. A child-oriented approach to toilet training. Pediatrics.
12. Blum NJ, Taubman B, Nemeth N. Relationship between age at initia-
1962;29:121–8. [PubMed: 13872676].
tion of toilet training and duration of training: a prospective study.
3. Foxx RM, Azrin NH. Dry pants: a rapid method of toilet training chil-
Pediatrics. 2003;111(4 Pt 1):810–4. [PubMed: 12671117].
dren. Behav Res Ther. 1973;11(4):435–42. [PubMed: 4777640].
13. Blum NJ, Taubman B, Nemeth N. Why is toilet training occurring at
4. Kaerts N, Van Hal G, Vermandel A, Wyndaele JJ. Readiness signs used
older ages? A study of factors associated with later training. J Pe-
to define the proper moment to start toilet training: a review of the
diatr. 2004;145(1):107–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.02.022. [PubMed:
literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(4):437–40. doi: 10.1002/nau.21211.
15238916].
[PubMed: 22396334].
14. Martin JA, King DR, Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. Secular trends and
5. Schum TR, Kolb TM, McAuliffe TL, Simms MD, Underhill RL, Lewis
individual differences in toilet-training progress. J Pediatr Psychol.
M. Sequential acquisition of toilet-training skills: a descriptive
1984;9(4):457–67. [PubMed: 6520660].
study of gender and age differences in normal children. Pediatrics.
15. Lang ME. Among healthy children, what toilet-training strategy is
2002;109(3):E48. [PubMed: 11875176].
most effective and prevents fewer adverse events (stool withholding
6. Schum TR, McAuliffe TL, Simms MD, Walter JA, Lewis M, Pupp R.
and dysfunctional voiding)?: Part B: Clinical commentary. Paediatr
Factors associated with toilet training in the 1990s. Ambul Pediatr.
Child Health. 2008;13(3):203–4. [PubMed: 19252701].
2001;1(2):79–86. [PubMed: 11888377].
16. Klassen TP, Kiddoo D, Lang ME, Friesen C, Russell K, Spooner C, et al.
7. Vermandel A, Van Kampen M, Van Gorp C, Wyndaele JJ. How to toilet
The effectiveness of different methods of toilet training for bowel
train healthy children? A review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn.
and bladder control. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006(147):1–57.
2008;27(3):162–6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20490. [PubMed: 17661380].
[PubMed: 17764212].
8. van Nunen K, Kaerts N, Wyndaele JJ, Vermandel A, Hal GV. Parents’
17. Taubman B. Toilet training and toileting refusal for stool only: a
views on toilet training (TT): A quantitative study to identify the
prospective study. Pediatrics. 1997;99(1):54–8. [PubMed: 8989338].