DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANANGEMENT ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR BEAUTIFUL SCHOOL

Enabling Environment INDICATORS Criteria 3 2 1

Adopted/Adapted/localized existing policies relating to DRRM
Legal Frameworks & 1 (3) All indicators are present
in education/school safety
Policies. Organizational
arrangements, 2 Designated School DRRM Focal Person (2) two of the indicators are present
1
leadership,
Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from
and coordination for risk
3 different offices; with defined membership and roles and (1) one of the indicators is present
reduction and resilience
responsibilities/functions
Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes CCA
Integration of risk 1 and EiE measures, covering risk assessment, risk reduction, and (3) All indicators are present
reduction rehabilitation and recovery
and resilience into
2 2 Students participated in the planning process (2) two-to-three of the indicators are present
education sector
strategies, 3 Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP) (1) one of the indicators is present
policies and plans 4 100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS

1 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget (3) All indicators are present
Funding for risk
reduction Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster
2 (2) two of the indicators are present
3 and resilience of or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
education
sector School has partnerships that could be tapped to support its
3 (1) one of the indicators is present
DRRM programs and activities, including those after a disaster

Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping

1 (3) All indicators are present
(DO 23, s. 2015)

Incorporated results of student-led school watching and hazard

2 (2) two-to-three of the indicators are present
mapping in the School DRRM Plan and SIP
Child-centered Risk
4
Assessment Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with
3 (1) one of the indicators is present
the community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST

School Planning Team have linked the community hazard maps

4
with education data to better understand the school’s risk
Existing Schools are being made safer, systematically
Assessment and 1 Number of school buildings with risk assessment 100% of the total number of school buildings = 3
prioritization for
retrofiting 80% of the total number of school buildings = 2
and replacement of Number of unsafe buildings with appropriate action undertaken
2
unsafe by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, retrofitted, non-usage, etc.)
70% of the total number of school buildings = 1
schools
Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school building
1 (3) All indicators are present
construction exist.
Resources and Plan to
school buildings Financial resources are allocated for completion of needed
2 action to address unsafe school buildings within a specified (2) two-to-three of the indicators are present
period

School Heads have identified those schools that are expected to

3 (1) one of the indicators is present
be used as temporary evacuation centers for disasters

Planning for limited use School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the
of schools as evacution school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and DSWD as per
5 centers, during the Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2013 "Guidelines
school year on Evacuation Center Coordination and Management" and RA
4
10821 "Children's Emergency Relief and Protection Act" and its
corresponding IRR

Conducted quarterly school inspection and maintenance of

1 (3) All indicators are present
facilities
Undertaken quarterly repair of minor classroom (including
2 (2) two-to-three of the indicators are present
facilities) damages
Maintenance to increase Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
safety and protection of 3 (1) one of the indicators is present
documented and assigned
investments in schools
School Heads have allotted budget for routine maintenance of
school facilities for safety and to protect investments, with
4 transparent monitoring oversight at the school level
PILLAR 2: Disaster Risk Reduction Management
School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan turned
Existence of national and 1 into response actions when a disaster strikes (This could be a (3) All indicators are present
sub-national plans for separate section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)
preparedness and
response, educational School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid kit in
2 (2) two of the indicators are present
continuity, and every instructional classroom
protection of education
sector investments School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary
3 Learning spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a disaster (area (1) one of the indicators is present
equivalent to atleast three classrooms)

School has ready resumption strategies and alternative delivery

modes to ensure education continuity (Alternative mode of
Existence of national and delivery materials e.g. MISOSA, Open HS Program, E-IMPACT,
sub-national plans for 1 etc.) Note: (3) All indicators are present
preparedness and ADMs in emergencies address the same issues that they address
response, educational during normal times, but are made more pronounced during
6 continuity, and periods of disasters and emergencies
protection of education
sector investments School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and
2 (2) two of the indicators are present
students
School has established a school personnel tracking
3 (1) one of the indicators is present
system/protocol in the event of a disaster
(3) More than two functioning fire extinguishers
properly hangged and labelled in the lobby of every
storey of all school buildings. Two or more
Existence of national and
handheld/base radio. Two or more megaphones, etc.
sub-national plans for
Exit and emergency signage and directory visible and
preparedness and
School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment, in readable within the school premises.
response, educational
1 case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, handheld/base radio,
continuity, and
generator, etc.); emergency signage and directory. (2) Two functioning fire extinguishers properly hangged
protection of education
sector investments and laballed in the lobby of every storey of all school
buildings. Two handheld/base radio. Two megaphones,
etc. Exit and emergency signage and directory visible
and readable within the school premises.
 (1) One functioning fire extinguisher properly hangged
and labelled in the lobby of every storey of the building.
One handheld/base radio, one megaphone, etc. Exit
and emergency signage and directory visible and
readable within the school premises. .

(3) all year level answered the Family Earthquake

Preparedness Homework pre -test and post-test.
Submitted the school consolidated results to theDepEd
DRRM Central Office, copy furnished the DepEd DRRM
Division Office.

(2) Grade 3 to Grade 10 answered the Family

School has ensured that students completed the Family Earthquake Preparedness Homework pre-test and post-
1 Earthquake Prepareness Plan; and school has reported test. Submitted the school consolidated results to
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office theDepEd DRRM Central Office, copy furnished the
DepEd DRRM Division Office.

(1) K2 to Grade 2 and SPED answered the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Homework pre-test and post-
test. Submitted the school consolidated results to
theDepEd DRRM Central Office, copy furnished the
DepEd DRRM Division Office.
(3) three or more trained personnel
School has trained personnel to administer first aid to students
1 (2) two trained personnel
and personnel
(1) one trained personnel
(3) three or more trained personnel
School has trained teachers and other personnel who could
1 (2) two trained personnel
provide psychosocial support to students
(1) one trained personnel
Conduct of regular School has established functional early warning system to
simulation drill, at all
inform students and personnel of hazards and emergencies
7 levels, 1 (3) All indicators are present
(protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), considering national and
to practice response
preparedness and to LGU warning systems and protocols
review
response plans (i.e. School conducted regular hazard-specific drills (at least 3
Contingency Plan) 2 hazards) with participation of stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs, (2) Three-to-five of the indicators are present
NGOs, community, PTA, alumni, and others)

School has conducted awareness and capacity building for

3 (1) one-to-two of the indicators are present
families and learners

School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of

4
the LGU

5 School has an evacuation plan and procedures

School has a student-family reunification plan that is clearly

6
disseminated to students, teachers and parents

(3) School Head participated in trainings from division,

region and partners.
School Head has participated in DRRM training from division or (2) School Head participated in trainings conducted by
1
region or partners any two from division or region or partners
(1) School Head participated in tranings conducted by
Conduct of regular any one from division or region or partners
simulation drill, at all (3) The team or its members participated in trainings
levels, from division, region and partners.
to practice response
preparedness and to (2) The team or its members participated in trainings
review School DRRM Team or its members participated in DRRM conducted by any two from division or region or
response plans (i.e. 1
training from division or region or partners partners
Contingency Plan)
(1) The team or its members participated in tranings
conducted by any one from division or region or
partners
100% of the total number of students enrolled = 3
points
1 Number of students who participated in the drills
80% of the total number of student enrolled = 2
70% of the total number of student enrolled = 1
DRRM, CCA and EiE in
Education
School has integrated key DRR and CCA concepts in the
1 (3) All indicators are present
curriculum based on the National Curriculum Guide
Skills and competencies of students are assessed through
Integration of 2 (2) Three-to-four of the indicators are present
measurable learning and risk reduction (RR) outcomes
common risk
School has a DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and
reduction and 3 (1) one-to-two of the indicators are present
school personnel
resilience messages
in the curriculum School has available and accessible quality and up-to-date
4
DRRM materials
Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted in
8 5
it, in every classroom

K-6 level = 3 points

Integration of 1 Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been integrated
4-6 level = 2 points
common risk 2-6 level = 1 point
reduction and
resilience messages 100% = 3 points
in the curriculum Percentage of students actively participating in various
1
DRRM/CCA/EiE activities 80% = 2 points
70% = 1 point
Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting
School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess
1 (3) All indicators are present
sustainable implementation (evaluation forms on file)
Data collection and consolidation of programs and activities on
2 DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and impact (2) two of the indicators are present
Monitoring, Evaluation exist
9
and Reporting
School submitted Rapid Assessment of Damage Report (RADAR)
3 to the DRRMS Central Office, within 72 hours after the (1) one of the indicators is present
onslaught of a hazard in the area (records of reports submitted