Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
Schools Division Office
Cabanatuan City
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: CHERRY JOY P. SANSAIT Name of Rater: RUTH M. TRINIDAD

Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DIVISION OF CABANATUAN CITY Date of Review:
Rating Period:
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and content within and inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy across curriculum form about knowledge of
teaching areas. content within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
3. Instructional materials Efficiency
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies that inter-observer agreement
enhance learner form about teaching
achievement in strategies that enhance
literacy and learner achievement in
numeracy skills. literacy and numeracy skills
used in teaching highlighting
learner-centered strategies
that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered Efficiency
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
Timeliness
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies to inter-observer agreement
develop critical form about teaching
and creative strategies to develop critical
thinking, as well and creative thinking, as
as other higher- well as other higher-order
order thinking thinking skills
skills. 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials Efficiency
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and Diversity structure to inter-observer agreement
of Learners engage learners, form about managing
individually or in classroom structure that
groups, in engages learners in various
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
meaningful activities Efficiency
exploration, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
discovery and highlighting various
hands-on classroom management
activities within a strategies that engage
range of physical learners in activities/tasks in
learning different physical learning
environments. environments
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form about
applying positive teacher management of learner
and non-violent behavior using the following
discipline to strategies:
ensure learning- 1. Providing motivation Efficiency
focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving
environments. positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
Timeliness
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services developmentally inter-observer agreement
appropriate form about using
learning differentiated,
experiences to developmentally appropriate
address learners’ learning experiences
gender, needs, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs Efficiency
strengths, developed highlighting
interests and differentiation in content,
experiences. product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
Timeliness
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services implemented inter-observer agreement
developmentally form about using
sequenced developmentally sequenced
teaching and teaching and learning
learning process
processes to 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs Efficiency
meet curriculum highlighting
requirements and developmentally sequenced
varied teaching instruction that meet
contexts. curriculum goals and varied
teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used
to implement
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality
collegial on LACs/FGDs/meetings
discussions that with proof of attendance
use teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
learner feedback sessions on use of teacher
to enrich teaching and learner feedback to
practice. enrich teaching practice with
proof of attendance
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services organized and inter-observer agreement
used appropriate form about using appropriate
teaching and teaching and learning
learning resources, including ICT
resources, Examples: Efficiency
including ICT, to  Activity sheets/task
address learning sheets/work sheets
goals.  PowerPoint presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality

Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and organized and inter-observer agreement
Reporting used diagnostic, form about using diagnostic,
formative and formative and summative
summative assessment strategies
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
assessment 2. Prepared lesson Efficiency
strategies plans/modified DLLs
consistent with highlighting appropriate use
curriculum of formative assessment
requirements. strategies
3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
Timeliness
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Education evaluated learner written work with summary
Services progress and of results and with signature
achievement of parents
using learner 2. Formative/summative
attainment data. assessment tools with TOS
and frequency of errors with
identified least mastered
skills
3. Class records/grading Efficiency
sheets
showing index of mastery
Timeliness
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education Communicated corrected test papers of the
Services promptly and same 3 learners in the same
clearly the learning area with parents’ or
learners’ needs, guardians’ signature and
progress and date of receipt
achievement to
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
key stakeholders,
Parent-Teacher conferences
including
parents/guardians in all quarters with proof of
. parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
Region III
Cabanatuan City

Weight
per KRA
parents/guardians using Efficiency
various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and
achievement submitted to
other stakeholders
Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality
Education various related Participation
Services works/activities 2. Certificate of Training
that contribute to 3. Certificate of Speakership
the teaching- 4. Committee involvement
learning process. 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
6. Book or Journal Efficiency
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairperson
ship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
Timeliness
BELINDA C. MALLARE, Ph. D. RIC C. BERNABE
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: CHERRY JOY P. SANSAIT Name of Rater: RUTH M. TRINIDAD

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

BELINDA C. MALLARE, Ph. D. RIC C. BERNABE

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like