I. General Information

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

*This assessment review was compiled by our students and is intended to be used as a guide in assisting clinicians.

We
encourage you to review the evaluations and assessments for yourself to guarantee the most accurate and updated
information.

I. General Information

Title of the test: Evaluation of Social Interaction (ESI)

Author: Ann G. Fisher & Lou Ann Griswold (2010)

Publisher: Three Star Press

Time required to administer: Subjective based on client’s typical social interactions.

Cost of the Test: Manual = $65. Course Training & Calibration (manual included) = $795 USD

II. Description of Test

Type/Purpose of Test: To evaluate the quality of person’s social interaction during real interaction with people they would
typically interact with. It is similar in style to the AMPS.

Population: Anyone age 2 ½ years through older adulthood who have social issues.

Focus of measurement:
___ Organic systems X Abilities X Participation/life habits ___ Environmental Factors

III. Practical Administration

Ease of Administration: The difficult part is that you have to be calibrated. Also, you must observe a client in at least two
‘real life’ social interactions. Being a fly on the wall might be difficult. Outside of that, it does not seem too difficult to
administer. I don’t have the manual to know for sure.

Clarity of Directions: I do not have access to the manual.

Scoring Procedures: I do not have access to the manual. The research article I found did not disclose this information.
All I could find is the following:
 The quality of 27 social interaction performance skills (i.e., Approaches/Starts, Turns toward, replies, discloses,
etc.) are scored.
 Scores range from 4 – 1, but I am not sure of the meaning behind each point value.
 You are evaluating the degree to which the client’s social interactions are polite, respectful, well-timed, relevant and
mature.

Examiner Qualification & Training


Requires involvement in a 3 day training and calibration course that is expensive.

IV. Technical Considerations

Standardization: Norms____ Criterion Referenced X Other __________________

Reliability: Reliability refers to the likeliness of the same person getting the same score on the assessment between two
trials. In the ESI, the parallel forms reliability coefficient is
r = 0.86.
Validity: Validity seeks to know if the items on the test are truly measuring what they are intended to measure. In the ESI,
r = 0.996 (they wrote r = 99.6 but a correlation is 1 or below, right?).

Manual: N/A Excellent N/A Adequate N/A Poor


 I did not have access to the manual

What is (are) the setting/s that you would anticipate using this assessment?
 Clients with:  DCD
 TBI  Anxiety Disorders
 Stroke  Bipolar
 Schizophrenia  Major depression
 Developmental Delays  Personality disorders
 ADHD  Autism spectrum disorders
 Intellectual Disability

Summary of strengths and weaknesses


Weakness:
 Very expensive
 Takes time to get calibrated

Strengths:
 Requires calibration.
 Good reliability and validity.
 Applies to almost all ages.
 Is occupation-based and client-centered (observes client in natural setting).
 Fills a niche in the field (i.e., it observes a social interaction in a natural, non-simulated encounter).
 Helps addresses an important client need (i.e., improving social skills).

You might also like