E JOD7B PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

C ase Report www.ejournalofdentistry.

com

EASY ESTHETIC MOCK-UP


Ahmad Bunashi DDS Prosthodontist, Farwania Dental Specialty Center Ministry of Health, Kuwait.
Correspondence: Ahmad Bunashi DDS Bayan 72053 State of Kuwait. Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT
Comunicting anticipated results between dentist and patient is impairative for successful veneer treatment. This
article describes a technique that allows for proper comunication of eshtetic result with ease .
Keywords: Esthetics, Mock-up, Veneers, bis-acrylic material.

Introduction: 4. Create a palatal window (Figs. 3 and 4):

Veneers play a major role in esthetically improving teeth in a. Using #11 blade, cut and remove, from
dentistry. They improve esthetics and are conservative in the putty index, the palatal side of the
the same time, preserving tooth structure. This feature has teeth to be restored.
made veneers a restoration of choice by many dentists when
performing esthetic rehabilitation. However, in these cases, b. Extend the window to the adjacent tooth
the challenge has always been meeting patient’s demands on each distal side.
and esthetic expectations.1,2,3 Perception of esthetics varies
c. Do not include the incisal edges in the
from patient to doctor and miscommunication regarding
window. Maintain incisal overlap with the
anticipated result can be frustrating to both ending in a
putty index.
failure.4,5,6 Adequate communication is crucial.
5. Trim both distal wing parts of the index so only
Several techniques to overcome such a problem have been
the imprint of teeth is kept. Remove all soft tissue
suggested in the literature vi z before and after
photographs,7 diagnostic wax setups,8,9,10 composite resin imprints to minimize interference when seated in
mock-up,11,12 computer imaging simulation13 or acrylic resin the mouth.
mock-up. This case report describes a technique were the 6. Trim the imprint of cervical soft tissue of the teeth
outcome of the treatment can be communicated to the patient to be restored so that only about 1mm of cervical
utilizing diagnostic wax setups and bis-acrylic material. soft tissue is kept.
Technique: 7. Try the index in the patient’s mouth and verify
seating.
1. Obtain diagnostic model of the patient and mount
models on an articulator (Fig.1). 8. Line the imprint of teeth with Bis-acrylic material
and seat swiftly in the patients mouth (Fig. 5).
2. Start and complete diagnostic wax up. Design
patient’s smile based on preliminary information 9. Using a cotton roll, swipe away the excess material
gathered at initial visit (Fig.2). quickly from the palatal side before material starts
to harden (Fig. 6).
3. Make a putty index duplicating the wax up:

a. Extend the putty index few teeth distal to 10. Allow for setting of bis-acrylic and then remove
teeth intended for restoration. the putty index.

b. Extend the putty to capture few 11. Check for adaptation. Remove any over-flashes
millimeters of the soft tissue. of material with composite polishing burs.

c. Make the putty index thick enough to 12. Allow patient to view and try the Mock-up of
allow for rigidity. anticipated final result (Fig.7).

e-Journal of Dentistry Oct - Dec 2011 Vol 1 Issue 4 104


Ahmad Bunashi www.ejournalofdentistry.com

13. Remove the mock-up by chipping it away with a Also, it must be kept in mind that this technique is intended
proper instrument. ( viz;excavators, or explorer) when facial veneers are the restoration planned for. Tooth
modification is not intended or will be minimal if any.
Discussion: Anticipated restoration is bonded over underlying
unmodified tooth structure. The discussed mock-up
A mock-up review of anticipated final restoration is an technique will not serve its purpose when correction of
important tool of communication between the doctor and rotated teeth, mal-angled teeth or when considerable
the patient. This technique allows for a Mock-up to be amount of tooth structure removal is needed. In such
fabricated with great ease and short clinical time. This situation, the mock-up created using this technique may
technique has several advantages: not convey an accurate representation of the anticipated
1. Does not require sophisticated software or restoration. In such cases, tooth modification is completed
digital imaging. and full coverage provisionals are more appropriate.

2. Requires minimum chair time for setting of


material and trimming

3. Excellent immediate adaptation to tooth


surface without the need for relines or
adjustments.

4. Patient can physically experience the


anticipated results at hand.

5. Patient’s remarks are more objective since


patients are physically trying a mock-up of
the anticipated restorations.

6. Bis-acrylic mock-up can be removed with


relative ease with minor risk of locking into
teeth embrassures.

The Bis-acrylate material has a great advantage over


polymethy methacrylate (PMMC), a commonly used
provisional restoration, because it sets initially in rubbery
stage which allows ease of manipulation and less risk of
locking into teeth embrasures.14,15 It is very brittle15 and can
be easily chipped off the teeth with an excavator or any
adequate instrument. It is also the experience of the author
that this mock-up can be left clipped on patients’ teeth for
a day. This allows patients to try them among friends and
family making the trial experience more realistic and their
feed back more objective. It is not recommended to keep
them for more than a day due to possible hygiene problems.

Disadvantages:

One great shortcoming of this technique, it is only good


for one time trial. Bis-acrylic brittleness will not allow the
created mock-up to be removed and re-inserted again.
Attempting to remove the mock-up will most likely cause it
to break. Relative high cost of material is another
disadvantage. Bis-acrylate material is more expensive in
comparison to PMMC.

105
Easy Esthetic Mock-up www.ejournalofdentistry.com

Conclusion:

A method to communicate the anticipated esthetic result to


a patient is very important. Several techiques have been
discussed in the literature. The technique described in this
article provides a method to communicate those anticipated
results to patients with ease at the chair-side utilizing bis-
acrylate material.
REFERENCES
1. Bush JB. Communication and patient education. Dent Assist 1968; 37(2):19-
21.
2. Christensen GJ. Informing patients about treatment alternatives. JADA
1999;130:730-2.
3. Goldstein RE, Lancaster JS. Survey of patient attitudes toward current esthetic
procedures.J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:775-80.
4. Fishman SR, Ortiz E Jr. Effective case presentation. Dent Clin North Am 1977;
21:539-48
5. Manji I. Getting Patient To Say Yes: Effective Case Presentations. J Can Dent
Assoc 1992;58(8):619-20.
6. Le vin RP. Case accept ance: 20 pitfalls. Compend Contin Educ Dent
2002;23(8):690-2.
7. Weisman G. Before and after: a step beyond with cosmetic imaging. Dent Prod
Rep1996:10:99-102.
8. Rudd KD. Making diagnoatic casts is not a waste of time. J Prosthet Dent
1968;20(2):98-100.
9. Johansen R, Dennis Y, Mullick S. Preview of appearance before extensive
bonding. Gen Dent 1989;37(1):58-9.
10. Magne P, Magne M, Belser U. The diagnostic template: a key element to the
comprehensive esthetic treatment concept. lnt J Periodontics Restorative Dent
1996;16:560-9.
11. Morley J. The role of cosmetic dentistry in restoring a youthful appearance.
JADA 1999;130:1166-72.
12. Behle C. Placement of direct composite veneers utilizing a silicone buildup
guide and intraoral mock-up. Pract periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:259-66.
13. Papasotiriou OS, Nathanson D, Goldstein RE. Computer imaging versus
conventional esthetic consultation: a prospective clinical study. J Esthet Dent
2000;12(2);72-7.
14. Lui JL, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. Temporary Restorations: A Review. Oper Dent
1986;11, 103-110.
15. Christensen GJ. The fastest and best provisional restorations. J Am Dent Assoc
2003;134(5);637-9.
16. Elledge DA, Hart JK, Schorr BL. A provisional restoration technique for
laminate veneer preparations. J prosth Dent 1989;62(2);139-42.
17. Sheets CG, Ono Y, Taniguchi T. Esthetic Provisional Restorations for Procelain
Veneers Preparations. J Esth Dent 1993;5(5);215-20.
18. Campagni WV, Caponigro CV. Provisional Restorations. CDA J. 1988
Apr;16(4):16-21.
19. Rouse JS. Facial shell temporary veneers: reducing chances for
misunderstanding. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Dec;76(6):641-3.

Source of Support : Nil, Conflict of Interest : Nil

e-Journal of Dentistry Oct - Dec 2011 Vol 1 Issue 4 106

You might also like