Pre-Eclampsia - Fisiopatologia
Pre-Eclampsia - Fisiopatologia
Pre-Eclampsia - Fisiopatologia
Authors:
S Ananth Karumanchi, MD
Kee-Hak Lim, MD
Phyllis August, MD, MPH
Section Editor:
Vincenzo Berghella, MD
Deputy Editor:
Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG
Contributor Disclosures
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is
complete.
Literature review current through: May 2019. | This topic last updated: Jun 06, 2018.
Transcriptomics and culture studies using human trophoblasts from women with
severe preeclampsia have suggested that semaphorin 3B may be a candidate
protein that contributes to the impaired trophoblast differentiation and invasion
by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor signaling [16]. A laser
microdissection approach enabled the identification of novel messenger RNAs
and noncoding RNAs that were differentially expressed by various trophoblast
subpopulations in severe preeclampsia [17]. Gene ontology analysis of the
syncytiotrophoblast data highlighted the dysregulation of immune functions,
morphogenesis, transport, and responses to vascular endothelial growth factor
and progesterone. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the specific
pathways that are disrupted.
Placental bed biopsies from women with preeclampsia have revealed increased
dendritic cell infiltration in preeclamptic decidual tissue [47]. The dendritic cells
are an important initiator of antigen-specific T-cell responses to transplantation
antigens. It is possible that increased number of dendritic cells may result in
alteration in presentation of maternal and fetal antigens at the decidual level,
leading to either abnormal implantation or altered maternal immunologic
response to fetal antigens.
However, definitive evidence for this theory is lacking. Genetic studies looking
at polymorphisms in the killer immunoglobulin receptors (KIR) on maternal NK
cells and the fetal HLA-C haplotype suggest that women with KIR–AA genotype
and fetal HLA-C2 genotype were at greatly increased risk of preeclampsia [48].
A systematic review found no clear evidence that one or several specific HLA
alleles were involved in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia [49]. The authors
suggested that interaction between maternal, paternal, and fetal HLA types,
rather than any individual genotype alone, was probably an important factor to
consider when studying immunogenetic determinants of preeclampsia.
(See "Immunology of the maternal-fetal interface".)
sporadic, genetic factors are thought to play a role in disease susceptibility [55-
64]. A genetic predisposition to preeclampsia is suggested by the following
observations:
●Primigravid women with a family history of preeclampsia (eg, affected
mother or sister) have a two- to five-fold higher risk of the disease than
primigravid women with no such history [56,57,64,65]. The maternal
contribution to development of preeclampsia can be partially explained by
imprinted genes [66]. In a study of sisters with preeclampsia, it was
demonstrated that the mother developed preeclampsia only when
the fetus/placenta inherited a maternal STOX1 missense mutation on
10q22; when the fetus/placenta carried the imprinted paternal homolog, the
preeclampsia phenotype was not expressed. (See "Inheritance patterns of
monogenic disorders (Mendelian and non-Mendelian)", section on 'Parent-
of-origin effects (imprinting)'.)
●The risk of preeclampsia is increased more than seven-fold in women who
have had preeclampsia in a previous pregnancy [67]
●The spouses of men who were the product of a pregnancy complicated by
preeclampsia are more likely to develop preeclampsia than spouses of men
without this history [58,64].
●A woman who becomes pregnant by a man whose previous partner had
preeclampsia is at higher risk of developing the disorder than if the
pregnancy with the previous partner was normotensive [59].
Although a study of preeclampsia in twins failed to find a genetic link [68], the
bulk of data suggests that both maternal and paternal contributions to fetal
genes may have a role in defective placentation and subsequent preeclampsia.
The genes for sFlt-1 and Flt-1 are carried on chromosome 13. Fetuses with an
extra copy of this chromosome (eg, trisomy 13) should produce more of these
gene products than their normal counterparts. In fact, the incidence of
preeclampsia in mothers who carry fetuses with trisomy 13 is greatly increased
compared with all other trisomies or with control pregnant patients [69]. In
addition, the ratio of circulating sFlt-1 to PlGF is significantly increased in these
women, thus accounting for their increased risk of preeclampsia [70]. A large
genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified a genetic risk variant with
genome-wide significance, and provided convincing replication in an
independent cohort [71]. This GWAS finding provides compelling evidence that
alterations in chromosome 13 near the FLT1 locus in the human fetal genome
are causal in the development of preeclampsia. It is striking that this first well-
powered unbiased GWAS focuses attention on the FLT1 genomic region, given
the body of literature devoted to the role of the FLT1 pathway in preeclampsia
pathogenesis. (See 'sFlt-1, VEGF, PlGF' below.)
A locus at 12q may be linked to hemolysis, elevated liver function tests, low
platelets (HELLP) syndrome, but not preeclampsia without HELLP syndrome,
suggesting that genetic factors important in HELLP syndrome may be distinct
from those in preeclampsia [62]. Alterations in long noncoding RNA at 12q23
have been implicated as one potential mechanism that may lead to HELLP
syndrome [72]. This long noncoding RNA regulates a large set of genes that
may be important for extravillous trophoblast migration.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Low calcium intake — Various dietary and lifestyle factors have been
associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia; however, causality has been
difficult to prove. A possible role for low dietary intake of calcium as a risk factor
for preeclampsia is suggested by epidemiologic studies linking low calcium
intake with increased rates of preeclampsia and prevention of preeclampsia
with calcium supplementation in high-risk women. The mechanism of this
association is not clear but may involve either immunologic or vascular effects
of calcium regulatory hormones that are altered in preeclampsia.
(See "Preeclampsia: Prevention", section on 'Calcium supplementation'.)
CLINICAL FINDINGS
Overview — All of the clinical features of preeclampsia can be explained as
clinical responses to generalized endothelial dysfunction [101,102]. As an
example, hypertension results from disturbed endothelial control of vascular
tone, proteinuria and edema are caused by increased vascular permeability,
and coagulopathy is the result of abnormal endothelial expression of
procoagulants. Headache, seizures, visual symptoms, epigastric pain, and fetal
growth restriction are the sequelae of endothelial dysfunction in the vasculature
of target organs, such as the brain, liver, kidney, and placenta.
In the aggregate, these observations suggest a major role for sFlt-1 and related
angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis of at least some features of
preeclampsia (figure 7) [138]. However, the trigger for increased sFlt-1
production by the placenta is unknown. The most likely trigger is placental
ischemia [139]. In vitro, placental cytotrophoblasts possess a unique property to
enhance sFlt-1 production when oxygen availability is reduced [140]. The
increased expression of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIFs) in
preeclamptic placentas is consistent with this hypothesis [141]. It is not known
whether increased sFlt-1 secretion is responsible for the early placental
developmental abnormalities characteristic of preeclampsia or a secondary
response to placental ischemia caused by some other factor. Genetic factors
may also play a role in excess production of sFlt-1 and placental size (eg,
multiple gestation) may play a role [142].
sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are
provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Hypertensive disorders of
pregnancy".)
patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics
patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade
reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might
have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a
general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the
Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more
detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are
best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some
medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We
encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also
locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on
"patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)