Ued496 Ashley Speelman Lessonpreparationplanninginstructingandassessing

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Running head: PLANNING, PREPARATION, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT 1

Lesson Planning, Preparation, Instruction, and Assessment

Ashley Speelman

Regent University
PLANNING, PREPARATION, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT 2

Lesson Planning, Preparation, Instruction, and Assessment

It is crucial for teachers to actively plan and prepare their lessons for students. Though

planning may be time-consuming, it is vital to staying on-task and ensuring that learning

objectives are covered. In order for teachers to properly plan for the instruction in the classroom,

they must assess students. In assessing students, teachers realize the learning gaps and needs of

their students which become the driving force of how they prepare and plan their instruction.

Rationale for Artifacts

The first artifact shown is a copy of the twenty-five-question subtraction assessment I

passed out to my students. Because the majority of my students did so poorly on the pre-

assessment, I was able to use the same assessment as the post-assessment. The majority of the

first-graders in my class were not familiar with subtraction. Six out of the twenty-one assessed

students got at least some of the answers correct. Fifteen of my students did not get any of the

pre-assessment questions correct. Many students added the digits instead of subtracting them

resulting in the incorrect answer each time. From, the pre-assessment scores, I sorted my

students into three groups. Group A was my group already familiar with subtraction, Group B

was my group that was familiar with addition but not subtraction, and Group C was the group

who had no idea what was going on and put random numbers or left most blank and drew a

picture on the back. The data from this assessment became the framework of how I built my

guided math small-group lesson.

The second artifact is a guided math small-group lesson. This lesson was created to be

tiered for each group. The beginning review instruction was the same in all three groups. The

groups would review the different strategies for subtraction. The activity was tiered for each

group. Group A (the highest group) completed the activity with a verbally given subtraction
PLANNING, PREPARATION, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT 3

problem up into the twenties. For example, the teacher would say, “what is 20-9”, and the

students would complete the activity. Group B received a written instruction to look at. Group C

(lowest group) received a written instruction as well as guidance throughout the activity. The

lesson was engaging for all groups, and the students seemed to benefit from it. This lesson

reflects the teacher’s competency to collect and assess data to formulate tiered lesson to meet the

needs of the students in a class.

The third artifact is the data collected from the pre-assessment and post-assessment. Due

to some serious illnesses going around the classroom, four students were unable to complete the

post-assessment. With exception of one student, those who did take the post-assessment seemed

to increase their scores drastically. This is not uncommon in a lower grade such as first because

everything is new to students. Many students had never heard of subtraction or even thought

about it. I was impressed they were able to pick it up so easily. Students showed significant

growth from pre-assessment to post-assessment.

Reflection

Assessing and instructing students is the true meat of a teacher’s job. The two main types

of assessments given are formative and summative assessments (Cornelius,2014). Teachers can

be constantly giving formative assessments by asking the class questions and assessing exit

tickets. This data may be constantly changing and forming as students increase more and more in

the understanding of a topic. Formative data can be used to group students based on their

academic needs and gaps for small group instruction. Summative assessments are typically tests

given at the end of a unit that assess a student’s comprehension after being instructed on all of

the objectives of that unit. Both summative and formative assessments are necessary in the

elementary classroom.
PLANNING, PREPARATION, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT 4

Not only is it important that teachers assess their students, but teachers should use that

data to create meaningful lesson plans. The seven-step lesson plan adopted by Madeline Hunter

is a popular lesson plan template that many teachers choose to follow because it outlines the

major portions a teacher should cover in a typical lesson (instruction, modeling, guided practice,

independent practice, etc…) (Wolfe,1987). Lesson plans provide a space for teachers to

contemplate the entirety of a lesson including the essential questions to be asked and activities

students are to do. Weber (2005,09), in his article on lesson planning, discusses how lesson

planning could be seen as planning for a television series. Weber’s article encouraged teachers to

start planning your finale first in order to engage your students (Weber, 2005,09). Teachers may

choose to plan differently, however, and may choose to plan their anticipatory set prior to the

closure of the lesson. Teachers often have differing preferences on the organizational aspects of

their lessons, however, those teachers who plan typically have stronger lessons than those who

do not. In one of my student-teaching placements one of the teachers in the grade-level did not

plan and their instruction was lackluster compared to those who did. Just like a good wedding,

party, or event is evidence of good planning, a good lesson is evidenced by planning.

Though the “how” behind assessing, preparing, and instructing may differ among

teachers, good teachers assess, organize data, and prepare and plan their lessons accordingly. As

a student-teacher, I have made many lesson plans and learned the importance of good

preparation. I will continue to plan in my teaching career because it is a good professional habit

for a teacher. I also plan to make notes on my lesson plans to better prepare for the future. As a

teacher, I will have to make the choice to work extra hard in order for my students to receive the

best possible instruction. This reminds me of Colossians 3:23 which says, “Whatever you do,

work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men” (ESV). As Christian teachers, we are called not to
PLANNING, PREPARATION, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT 5

be lazy, but to work heartily for the Lord. Teachers can work heartily for the Lord in their calling

by taking the time to plan, prepare and assess students for appropriate instruction
PLANNING, PREPARATION, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT 6

References

Cornelius, K. E. (2014). Formative Assessment Made Easy: Templates for Collecting Daily Data

in Inclusive Classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(2), 112–118. https://doi-

org.ezproxy.regent.edu/10.1177/0040059914553204

Weber, C. (2005, 09). Ultimate lesson planning secrets. Catechist, 39, 65-68. Retrieved from

http://eres.regent.edu:2048/login?url=https://search-proquest-

com.ezproxy.regent.edu/docview/213774841?accountid=13479

Wolfe, P. (1987). What the “Seven-Step Lesson Plan” Isn’t! Educational Leadership, 44(5), 70.

Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.regent.edu:2048/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&A

N=8718071&site=ehost-live

You might also like