Irp 4 2015
Irp 4 2015
Irp 4 2015
EDITION: 4.0
SANCTION DATE: April 2015
Copyright/Right to Reproduce
Copyright for this Industry Recommended Practice is held by Enform, 2014. All rights
reserved. No part of this IRP may be reproduced, republished, redistributed, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted unless the user references the copyright ownership of
Enform.
Disclaimer
This IRP is a set of best practices and guidelines compiled by knowledgeable and
experienced industry and government personnel. It is intended to provide the operator
with advice regarding the specific topic. It was developed under the auspices of the
Drilling and Completions Committee (DACC).
The recommendations set out in this IRP are meant to allow flexibility and must be used
in conjunction with competent technical judgment. It remains the responsibility of the
user of this IRP to judge its suitability for a particular application.
Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data and
recommendations contained in this IRP. However, DACC, its subcommittees, and
individual contributors make no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection
with the publication of the contents of any IRP recommendation, and hereby disclaim
liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from the use of this IRP, or for any
violation of any legislative requirements.
Availability
This document, as well as future revisions and additions, is available from:
Enform Canada
5055 – 11 Street NE
Calgary, AB T2E 8N4
Phone: 403.516.8000
Fax: 403.516.8166
Website: www.enform.ca
April 2015 i
Table of Contents IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Table of Contents
4.0 Preface ....................................................................................................... i
4.0.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................... i
4.0.2 Audience ........................................................................................................ i
4.0.3 Scope and Limitations .................................................................................. i
4.0.4 Revision Process ......................................................................................... ii
4.0.4.1 Revision History ...................................................................................... iii
4.0.5 Sanction ....................................................................................................... iii
4.0.6 Acknowledgements..................................................................................... iv
4.0.7 Range of Obligations ................................................................................... v
4.0.8 Copyright Permissions ................................................................................ v
4.1 Roles and Responsibilities...................................................................... 1
4.1.1 Owners and Service Contractors Responsibilities .................................... 1
4.1.2 Gas Detection Monitoring for Explosive and Flammable Limits ............... 4
4.1.3 Drilling Service Company Responsibilities ................................................ 5
4.1.4 Safety Service Company Responsibilities.................................................. 5
4.1.5 Well-Testing Company Responsibilities..................................................... 5
4.1.6 Fluid Hauling Company Responsibilities ................................................... 6
4.2 Worker Safety ........................................................................................... 7
4.2.1 Complete Well on Paper (CWOP) ................................................................ 7
4.2.2 Minimum General Safety Standards ........................................................... 7
4.2.3 Well Testing Workers ................................................................................... 9
4.2.3.1 Recommended Minimum of Well Testing Workers on a Wellsite during
Testing Operations .................................................................................................. 9
4.2.3.2 One (1) Qualified Well Testing Worker per Shift ..................................... 10
4.2.3.3 Two (2) Qualified Well Testing Workers per Shift ................................... 10
4.2.3.4 Three (3) Qualified Well Testing Workers per Shift ................................. 11
4.2.3.5 Minimum Well Testing Workers Qualifications ........................................ 12
4.2.4 Minimum Worker Wear Requirements ...................................................... 14
4.2.5 Well Designation for Worker Safety in H2S Environments ...................... 15
4.2.6 Equipment Inspections .............................................................................. 15
4.3 Well Testing ............................................................................................ 17
4.3.1 Wellhead Control ........................................................................................ 17
4.3.1.1 Standards............................................................................................... 17
April 2015 i
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Table of Contents
ii April 2015
Table of Contents IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
iv April 2015
4.0 Preface IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
4.0 Preface
An integral part of the exploration and development of oil and gas resources is reservoir
evaluation. Evaluation methods with the greatest inherent environmental and safety
concerns are those which remove reservoir fluids by means of drill stem testing, well
testing or any other methods of flowback. The safe handling of highly volatile reservoir
or stimulation fluids and corrosive or toxic fluids are of concern when evaluating a well to
avoid developing a combustible hydrocarbon gas/air mixture.
4.0.1 Purpose
The environmental, safety and health risks associated with well testing and fluid
handling can be minimized by ensuring workers are properly trained, implementing
prudent procedures and using properly designed equipment.
The purpose of this document is to ensure that guidelines for well testing and fluid
handling operations are in place and readily available for all personnel. Industry
Recommended Practice (IRP) 4 is intended to supplement existing standards and
regulations. It is also intended to establish guidelines in areas where none existed
previously.
4.0.2 Audience
The intended audience of this document includes oil and gas company engineers, field
consultants, well testing and fluid hauling personnel, other specialized well services
personnel and regulatory bodies.
Personnel Requirements
Operational Procedures
Loading, Unloading and Transportation of Fluids
The practices described in IRP4 should be considered in conjunction with other industry
recommended practices, individual operator’s well testing and fluid handling practices
and site specific considerations. It is recognized that other procedures and practices as
April 2015 i
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.0 Prefaces
IRP4 includes:
IRP 4 supplements existing standards and regulations, and provides guidelines and
recommendations where none existed previously. IRP4 also refers to other pertinent
standards where appropriate, and provides information on how to access them. A full list
of the documents referred to in this IRP and other useful reference material is provided
in References.
The DACC formally reviews the need to revise IRP 4 every four years considering
changes in scope, purpose, technology, practices, etc. Enform tracks review dates and
brings them to DACC’s attention when required.
Technical issues brought forward to DACC and scheduled review dates can trigger a re-
evaluation and review of this IRP in whole or in part. For details on the IRP creation and
revisions process, visit the Enform website at www.enform.ca.
This is the third revision to IRP 4. Those who have been familiar with the first two
editions of IRP 4 should take the time to review this edition thoroughly, as it has been
ii April 2015
4.0 Preface IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
completely re-developed to address issues brought forward since the last edition by
industry and government stakeholders.
In 1999, the scope and breath of recommended practices encompassed many more
issues, companies, associations and governments. The reference to Alberta in the title
of these practices changed to Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) to better reflect
this broader scope. Where industry has grown to other regions of western Canada,
these IRPs continue to assist companies in their daily operations. These IRPs are
intended to follow the user to any site, anywhere in the world, as a minimum operating
practice.
In 2005, IRP 4 was reviewed and updated to reflect the changes in industry and
legislation. With approval from DACC, a new committee was formed to address the
need for a complete review and update of the document.
In 2009, a new section was added: 4.3.7 High Reid Vapour Fluid Recovery and
Handling. Hyperlinks were updated on all other sections.
In 2012 section 4.3.7 High Reid Vapour Fluid Recovery and Handling was revised.
Hyperlinks were updated on all other sections.
In 2014, IRP4 was transferred into a new DACC IRP template and all sections were
reviewed by the committee and updated to reflect current standards and practices in the
industry.
4.0.5 Sanction
The following organizations have sanctioned this document:
4.0.6 Acknowledgements
The following individuals helped to develop this edition of IRP 4 through a subcommittee
of DACC.
Development Committee
Name Company Organization Represented
Craig S. Marshall FMC Technologies Committee Chair
Canada Ltd
Steven Dale Berg, P. Tech Sun Country Well CAODC
(Eng.) Servicing
Yingli Chu BC Oil and Gas BC Oil and Gas Commission
Commission
Robert A. Knowles Weatherford Canada PSAC
Partnership (CPD&T)
Westin Bennett Alberta Energy Regulator Alberta Energy Regulator
(AER) (AER)
Randal McNeill Husky Energy CAPP
Caleb Miller Weatherford – Testing PSAC
and Production Services
Jennifer J. Reid, P. Eng. Devon Canada CAPP
Bryan S. Toth Ensign Energy Services CAODC
Inc.
Cindy L. Wright, C.E.T Grant Production Testing PSAC
Colby Ruff Alberta Energy Regulator Alberta Energy Regulator
(AER) (AER)
Peter Schmeiler OPSCO Energy CAODC
Industries Ltd
Carole Sterenberg Enform Enform
Carol Balogh C*quin Communications Enform
iv April 2015
4.0 Preface IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Range of Obligation
Term Usage
A specific or general regulatory and/or legal requirement that must be
Must followed.
May An option or action that is permissible within the limits of the IRP
April 2015 v
4.1 Roles and Responsibilities IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP The well site owner shall ensure the following breathing equipment is
provided as a minimum:
IRP Refer to CSA standard CSA-Z94.4-02 selection, care and use of respiratory
equipment.
April 2015 1
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.1 Roles and Responsibilities
the contractor assigned to flow the well to open tank systems must have a
supervisor present during the operation.
IRP At all times, the owner’s representative shall have a trained and competent
person onsite in the operation of an LEL meter. The owner’s representative
shall ensure availability of an LEL meter on all sites.
References/Links
IRP The owner shall instruct the service contracting company to:
Provide signage ordering vehicles to stop at the lease entrance on all sites
where gas is vented to atmosphere.
Ensure there are an adequate number of qualified workers on the well site at all
times to conduct operations safely.
Provide fluid hauling companies with shipping documents such as a waste
manifest that describes the properties and potential hazards associated with
fluids to be transported in appropriate Transportation of Dangerous Goods
(TDG) terms.
References/Links
2 April 2015
4.1 Roles and Responsibilities IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Ensure sour fluids are transported during normal hours of operations unless
special arrangements and precautions have been made between the owner and
the truck operator. This may include standby workers, equipment, and
monitoring devices.
Ensure appropriate safety equipment (i.e., H2S monitor, explosive mixture
monitor, and respiratory protective equipment) is available.
Maintain a contingency plan including procedures for truck loading, unloading,
and transportation-related spills.
IRP Owners shall prepare a program of operations that should be available for
viewing by all participating contractors prior to job commencement. The
program should include, but is not limited to:
IRP The prime contractor shall ensure that their representative is able to
provide competent and effective supervision of the operations to carry out.
April 2015 3
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.1 Roles and Responsibilities
IRP The owner’s site representative must be trained and competent in the use
of gas detection meters. The site representative must possess or make
available at the well site, a gas detection meter capable of measuring LEL.
IRP Where the owner does not have a site representative, the owner shall
ensure a gas detection meter is available to the site workers.
IRP No worker shall enter the 50 m safety zone around an open tank system
where gas vapours have been vented to atmosphere until cleared to do so
by the owner’s site representative or the worker who is responsible for
monitoring the area with a gas detection meter.
NOTE: Refer to Section 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks for more detail on
the requirement of gas detection and flowing wells to open tank
systems.
NOTE: Refer to CAPP Flammable Environments Guideline and IRP 18
Upstream Petroleum Fire and Explosion Hazard Management
4 April 2015
4.1 Roles and Responsibilities IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP The drilling service company shall ensure that the equipment and facilities
it is contracted to supply are available during the operation and it is
designed for the parameters of the project.
IRP The safety service company shall ensure that the equipment it is
contracted to supply is; available during the operation, is in good working
order and is designed for the parameters of the project.
IRP The safety service company must ensure proper equipment for respiratory
protection, H2S gas detection, breathing-air supply and determining
explosive limits.
IRP The safety service company must provide training of all workers on the
worksite in the specific use of this equipment as required.
IRP The well testing company shall ensure the equipment and facilities it is
contracted to supply are designed and suited for the application.
April 2015 5
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.1 Roles and Responsibilities
IRP The fluid hauling company shall ensure that the equipment and facilities it
is contracted to supply are available during the operation, are in good
working order, and are designed for the parameters of the project.
6 April 2015
4.2 Worker Safety IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Pre-job safety meetings occur most frequently at the office rather than at the jobsite.
Suggested topics include, but are not limited to:
Scope of work
Procedures to be followed.
Pertinent well and fluid characteristics
Responsibilities of each person involved in the operation
Emergency procedures, special hazards and safe briefing areas
April 2015 7
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.2 Worker Safety
Wellsite illumination must be sufficient to safely perform the job (Refer to Lease
Lighting Guideline).
8 April 2015
4.2 Worker Safety IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Safety stairs (or equivalent devices that would allow a rescue at the top of a tank
other than by ladder access) are required whenever breathing apparatus is
required at the top of a tank.
Fall arrest equipment and a fall protection plan must be available as required by
OH&S regulations.
An Emergency Shutdown device (ESD) must be installed on wells with more
than 1379 kPa pressure and H2S content greater than 1% or one tonne of
sulphur per day. Additional considerations for use of an ESD are wells that:
NOTE: These points are by no means all of the general safety standards
that should be followed. The points are listed as having special
relevance to well testing. Well testing companies may use a fixed
period to orient and train newer employees while on the job
provided that it does not contradict the well owner’s policy and the
employees are adequately protected by other certified workers on
location.
NOTE: These points are minimum standards and contractors should
determine whether the well owner has additional standards.
The following identifies key situations and recommends a minimum number of workers
required to conduct the operation safely and efficiently.
IRP Test equipment should be selected to reduce the risk of workers being exposed
to toxic vapours. Pressurized storage for the liquid phase is one method of
significantly reducing the toxic vapour hazard.
April 2015 9
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.2 Worker Safety
IRP For well testing, a minimum of two (2) working, qualified test workers per shift
are recommended.
IRP One (1) qualified well testing person per shift may be used on sweet or sour
wells in the following circumstances:
A Hazard Assessment/Job Site Analysis (JSA) has been completed to define all
worker’s roles and responsibilities and the chain of command.
The individual has the knowledge and qualifications to perform as required.
The individual is in a well test supervisory capacity only, supervising two other
workers at the site, in non-flowing operations such as swabbing, circulating,
venting or bleeding off a well directly to a certified registered pressurized tank.
The workers at the site assigned to the well testing supervisor are willing and
capable of operating well testing equipment as instructed.
The well is not flowed continuously to establish gas or fluid rates.
Where equipment rigged in a sour inline mode is automated and remotely
controlled, the well owner may summon one (1) qualified representative from the
well testing company to the location for consultation or calibration of equipment
as long as a qualified owning and operating company representative is present
on the location at the same time.
Where the well tester is installing electronic data gathering equipment on existing
facilities and is in contact with the owner’s representative.
IRP A minimum of two (2) qualified well testing workers per shift are recommended in
the following circumstances:
10 April 2015
4.2 Worker Safety IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
The operation is a sour inline test, with all measured well effluents at the
separator diverted back to the pipeline.
A sour operation with essentially no inflow from the producing zone, such as the
servicing of a hydraulically killed well or where the formation is mechanically
isolated.
A sour operation where the final sour liquid storage stage for produced fluids is a
certified, registered, pressurized vessel or tank and the pressure vessel or tank
is not preceded by more than one separation stage.
A sour operation where the final liquid storage vessel is a non-registered, non-
certified vessel preceded by a certified, registered vessel or tank provided the
operating pressure of the non-certified, non-registered vessel or tank does not
exceed 50% of the design pressure.
A sour operation where the final sour liquid storage stage is an atmospheric tank
system where the tank(s) and thief hatches are designed for a maximum of 7kPa
working pressure and there is a maximum of two atmospheric tanks.
The operating pressure at the atmospheric tank system does not exceed 50% of
the design pressure.
The atmospheric tank system is not preceded by more than one separation
stage.
The atmospheric tank system is gauged only by gauge boards or electronic
system.
The H2S concentration does not exceed 5%.
IRP If the conditions in Section 4.3.4.4 General Flowback Conditions cannot be met,
a minimum of three (3) qualified well testing workers per shift are recommended.
April 2015 11
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.2 Worker Safety
IRP If an operation cannot rapidly eliminate excess toxic vapours, the well
must be shut in and additional equipment and/or workers called out.
Assistant Operator
The Assistant Operator reports to the Shift Leader. The individual must have:
Within a reasonable amount of time after initial hire, the individual should have:
Company-specific training
Basic knowledge of employers safety policies and emergency procedures
Understand IRP 4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling as it applies to the individual's
job function.
Basic knowledge of equipment functions
Basic knowledge of safety equipment
12 April 2015
4.2 Worker Safety IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
The Shift Forman/Operator/Shift Supervisor leads one shift and reports to the Test or
Job Supervisor/Project Manager. In addition to the Assistant Operator qualifications, the
individual must have:
Command of basic testing skills (in order to be able to lead a shift with minimum
supervision)
IRP Volume 18 Upstream Petroleum Fire and Explosion Hazard Management
advanced training
Confined space entry and rescue training
A thorough knowledge of the employer’s safety policies and emergency
procedures
Knowledge of pressure ratings of system elements
Extensive training in the use of safety equipment.
Ability to identify and assess hazardous conditions and act accordingly.
An understanding of safety responsibilities of assistants.
Ability to train subordinates.
Basic knowledge of local, provincial, and federal regulations
The Test or Job Supervisor/Project Manager is the well testing company’s overall
supervisor. In addition to Shift Foreman/Operator/Shift Supervisor qualifications, the
individual must be able to:
April 2015 13
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.2 Worker Safety
o Synthetic fibres can contribute to static electricity generation and melt to the
skin in a flash fire.
14 April 2015
4.2 Worker Safety IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
There may be other substances as onerous for maintaining worker safety and must be
considered when planning work programs. Provincial OH&S Acts define the exposure
limits for numerous substances. Those documents should be referred to when
substances other than H2S are known to be present at the well site. The well
designations in this IRP are designed for worker safety when working in H2S
environments. For definitions see the Glossary section provided.
IRP Equipment should be designed, fabricated, inspected and tested to its intended
most severe service to minimize the effects of corrosion, erosion and stress
cracking, etc.
IRP Well testing companies shall repair or alter piping and vessels in
accordance to Section 4.3.2.3 Codes of Construction and jurisdictional
regulatory requirements.
References/Links
Saskatchewan – TSASK
April 2015 15
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP BOP rams are not considered to be master valves and should not be used for
securing or controlling the well except in case of emergency.
IRP Where practical, well tests will be conducted through a wing valve connected to
a flow tee above a full bore master valve.
Full bore
Master Valve
April 2015 17
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
IRP Equipment flow capacities and pressures must be sized for the flow rates
of the program and need not be sized for the maximum capacity of the well
for all phases. Flow capacities may be derived from detailed calculations,
nomographs and experience.
IRP All wells to be flowed having a surface pressure greater than 1379 kPa and
H2S content greater than 1% require an ESD valve.
IRP Any well that exceeds 34.5 MPa anticipated shut-in pressure should have
an ESD valve.
IRP Any well with anticipated abrasive flowback should have an ESD valve.
IRP The upstream system and the liquid storage stage must be designed to
reduce, eliminate or control the escape of vapours to the environment.
IRP Pressure Safety Valves (PSVs) must be piped to a safe area for discharge.
IRP On sour or critical sour wells, PSVs must be piped with a separate line to a
flare stack.
IRP The PSV line must not be co-mingled with a flare line, unless the maximum
source pressure (bottom-hole pressure) is less than the maximum
operating pressure equipment that the PSV is protecting or approved by an
engineer.
IRP The PSV discharge line must be the same size or greater than the outlet
connection requirements of the PSV unless certified by engineering
documents that show no back pressure will develop in the discharge line
that will hinder the operation of the PSV.
IRP For sweet wells, a hazard assessment should be completed with the client to
determine when the PSV must be piped with a separate line to a flare stack.
18 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
CO2 content
Inhibition of solid deposition and the reduction of solution gas and foam at the
separation and liquid storage stage.
Ambient temperatures
Hydrate potential
References/Links
April 2015 19
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
IRP Production lines to non-certified storage tanks, flare lines and vent lines
may be exempted from complete conformance to sour service
requirements if the lines will not normally be exposed to pressures in
excess of 448 kPa (65 psia) and the lines have an adequate pressure rating
for short term abnormal service.
IRP Line pipe threading must not be used above 3.45 MPa (500 Psig), for pipe
sizes above 33mm (1” nominal) unless a hazard assessment has been
completed.
IRP At a maximum, the line pipe threading ratings of API 6A (latest edition)
shall apply, provided that the thread depth ratings of Table 2 Pressure
Ratings of Seamless Pipe are not exceeded.
IRP For all EUE threaded tubing refer to manufacturer’s specifications for pressure
ratings.
IRP Other connections that are not defined by standards such as ASME, API, CSA,
etc., may be acceptable (e.g., Camlock connections, Unibolt connections, etc.)
provided that:
20 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP All 50.8 mm (2ʺ) unions of the following design must be identifiable
through a unique colour coding.
IRP Where lines of 33 mm O.D. (1" nominal) or less are normally filled with a stable
fluid (e.g., pressure gauge lines filled with methanol), flexible lines are
acceptable as long as they are certified for that fluid and do not exceed the
maximum working pressure of that line.
IRP All flexible piping must be secure at the ends in the event of connection
failure to prevent whipping of the line.
IRP Consideration should be given to the use of steel lines where flexible
piping could be subject to excessive heat such as flare stacks, incinerators
and vapourizers.
IRP A hazard assessment must be conducted when using flexible piping near
heat producing devices.
4.3.2.8 Elastomers
IRP Elastomers must be selected according to the flowing characteristics and
the effluent properties (e.g., H2S, pH, temperature) of the well.
Reference/Links
NACE TM 0187-87, Standard Method for Evaluating Elastomeric Materials in Sour Gas
Environments.
April 2015 21
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
22 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
4.3.3.2 Equipment Spacing for more than One Certified, Pressurized Tank
IRP Where two or more certified, pressurized tanks are used as either a
primary flow vessel or for storage of fluids, the tanks must be a minimum
of 25 m from the wellhead and can be placed side-by-side.
April 2015 23
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
The meeting should be recorded and the agenda should include, but is not limited to:
24 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
1. All non-essential workers must vacate the surrounding area of the testing
equipment, flowlines and wellhead. These workers shall not return to the area
until cleared to do so by the owner’s wellsite representative after consultation
with the well test supervisor/ manager.
2. With the wing valve closed, open the master valve and record pressures.
3. Open the wing value to a pre-determined choke size to avoid pressure
locking the choke.
4. Adjust the choke slowly to the pressure vessel. Set operating pressures
immediately and set liquid levels as soon as possible.
5. Begin vessel leak checks immediately, closely followed by downstream
checks. For sour wells, those performing detailed leak checks must wear
respiratory equipment.
6. Check H2S concentration as soon as possible and at regular intervals
thereafter. Shut in the well if additional equipment or workers are required.
7. Refer to the liquid loading and hydrate charts (Appendix D) to ensure proper
flowing conditions.
IRP The flowback should be performed by the following these generalized guidelines:
IRP If the equipment or the procedure cannot safely accommodate the flow, the well
testing company’s supervisor of the shift has the ultimate authority to reduce the
flow or shut in the well.
April 2015 25
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
26 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP The pressure test must be documented and posted at the wellsite.
IRP On wells defined as critical sour (see Glossary), the flow line from the
wellhead to the choke must be pressure tested to the maximum expected
shut in tubing head pressure (SITHP).
IRP Downstream of the choke an inert medium or wellhead gas may be used.
IRP Open-ended piping (e.g., flare lines, vent lines) and production tanks can be
pressure tested with an approved system. For example, lock out tag out can be
used.
IRP Closed tanks must be depressurized and not be on vacuum before opening
the system. If available on site, purge the system with inert gas. Evacuate
as much fluid (and solid) as possible before opening the system.
April 2015 27
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
IRP Prior to opening a closed tank system to check its contents, a hazard
assessment must be conducted by the systems owner representative on
shift. The assessment must be documented and signed by both the
systems owner representative and, if present, the well owner
representative.
IRP The individual who completes the confined space entry permit must have
confined space entry training. This includes, but is not limited to:
References/Links
28 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
It is recognized that velocities on sour gas above 1% H2S may exceed 95.4
m/sec for a short term.
Flame arrestors within the flare line are not recommended. Other forms of
flashback control are acceptable.
See Appendix D for information on pipe size versus velocity graphs.
IRP Refer to the operations manual for proper care and maintenance.
IRP A hazard assessment must be done for all flammable gases leaving the
scrubber.
IRP The properties of any produced fluids or solids should be evaluated to:
April 2015 29
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
4.3.10 Oils
IRP The properties of the produced oils should be evaluated for the following
hazards:
4.3.11 Gas
IRP The properties of the produced gases should be evaluated for the following
hazards:
4.3.12 Water
IRP The properties of the produced water should be evaluated for possible gas
entrainment and ignition potential.
NOTE: If it is necessary to locate tanks next to the lease road exit (e.g.,
small leases or remote locations to comply with other spacing
requirements) ensure adequate transportation for workers is
available in the event of an emergency. This transportation should
be off the lease when no other means of egress are available.
4.3.13 Tanks
4.3.13.1 Rig Tanks
IRP Where gas vapours are vented to atmosphere from an open tank system,
the tank must be a minimum of 50 m from the wellhead. For shallow wells
and coal-bed methane a distance of 35 m from wellhead is required.
30 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP Where a degasser is used to separate gases and liquids, it should be located in
a separate compartment of the rig tank. The degasser should be configured such
that a sufficient head of fluid in the tank is maintained for efficient gas separation.
IRP Flowback operations must be discontinued if liquid carry over from the
degasser vent line occurs. An appropriately sized separator or pressurized
tank must be employed.
NOTE: IRP 1 Critical Sour Drilling; Section 1.7 Mud Gas Separators
provides an overview of degasser design factors including vent
line sizing.
NOTE: See Section 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks for flowing to open top
tanks.
IRP Atmospheric tanks are predominantly used for storage of fluids and are not
considered capable of containing pressure. Most atmospheric tanks are
designed with 7 kPa (16oz) hatches and the roof is typically designed to shear at
14 kPa (2 psi).
IRP When producing sour fluids, atmospheric tanks must be equipped with a
suitable vapour gathering, flaring or scrubbing system to ensure that H2S
vapours are not released to atmosphere. The system may also include a
pressurized tank.
IRP Fluid storage tanks require an external fluid level indicator that can be used for
level measurement.
IRP The tops/lids of atmospheric storage tanks are not designed to serve as a
work platform. Any maintenance or work required on top of these tanks
must be conducted while the tank is in a horizontal position.
April 2015 31
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
IRP Pressurized tanks or a closed system should be used for flowbacks, storing,
producing, pumping, swabbing or killing wells with high vapour pressure
hydrocarbons (see Glossary).
IRP When flowing a well with >10 ppm H2S, a closed system must be used to
prevent the escape of sour gas to the atmosphere unless superseded by
local jurisdiction.
References/Links
IRP 2 Completing and Servicing Critical Sour Wells; Section 2.5, Fluids and Circulating
System contains additional information regarding the necessary fluid handling
equipment for critical sour wells. Section 2.10, Quality Programs for Pressure
Containing Equipment includes the basic information regarding quality programs.
NACE MR 01-75 latest edition, Sulphide Stress Cracking Resistant Metallic Materials for
Oilfield Equipment has a 350 kPa pressure limit below which the requirements do not
apply.
32 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Air from dry run tubing (i.e., for under balanced perforating)
Coiled tubing unit operations using air
Swabbing, when the well goes on vacuum
Reaction productions (i.e., hydrogen peroxide washes)
April 2015 33
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
IRP Purging should be performed by a purge medium vapour displacing air. Non-
flammable vapours are preferred. Propane or sweet gas is acceptable with extra
precautions recognizing that the purge medium will create explosive mixtures
before air purging is complete.
IRP The well should be flowed slowly to the separator unit, then to the flareline, then
to downstream vessels. Downstream vessels must be isolated and purged one
at a time.
34 April 2015
4.3 Well Testing IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
NOTE: Atmospheric tanks that will not be vented to flare do not require
purging.
IRP Purging should be in a downstream sequence, flow line, and heater, if present,
then separator, then flare line, then to downstream vessels. Downstream vessels
must be isolated and purged one at a time.
NOTE: The flow line would be purged from the wellhead to the separator
unit, if the vapour was introduced at the wellhead. It is also
acceptable to use the separator as a point of origin for the purge
vapour. In that case, the flow line would be purged back to the
wellhead (with the line disconnected at the wellhead).
IRP Where practical, oxygen meters are recommended for large vessels, regardless
of the calculated over purge. The sensing should be performed at points other
than the purge exit of the component (in case of air by-passing instead of
displacement). Oxygen content must be such that the gas mixture is below its
lower explosive limit.
April 2015 35
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.3 Well Testing
36 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Operators must burn all non-conserved volumes of gas if volumes and flow rates
are sufficient to support stable combustion.
BC: H2S exceeds 10 ppm (parts per million).
AB: H2S exceeds 10 ppm, or as otherwise specified.
The gas or vapours have a toxic effect that is above the occupational exposure
limit.
The vapours or gasses from the well effluent are heavier than air. Generally fluid
with an API greater than 50 or gases with a gravity of over 1.0.
There are human residents within 500 m.
There are other human activities 200 m downwind of location.
Flowing to an open top tank may adversely affect the environment.
Hydrocarbon gas cumulative volume to atmosphere exceeds 2.0x103 m3 total in a
24 hour period.
The actual flowing duration is more than 24 hours.
Flowing or start up after dark is permitted only where absolutely necessary.
IRP The open top tank must be designed with an inlet diffuser and a device to
prevent splashing and misting of the fluid.
IRP There should also be a device for indicating the fluid level in the tank that
can be read from over 50 m away.
April 2015 37
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
IRP Placement of the open top tank must conform to the following:
A choke with a bypass must be installed on the wellhead to initiate, control and
shut in flow to the open top tank at a safe distance of 25 m.
There should be a pressure gauge, temperature reading device and a methanol
injection point installed upstream and a pressure gauge installed downstream of
the choke.
The line to the tank must be hard piped and no hoses shall be used.
The line must have restraining devices to prevent movement of the line in case
of failure.
No personnel shall enter the 25 m hazard zone around the tank while flowing.
After the flow to the tank has been shut down, an appropriate wait time must be
allowed to let any gas or vapours dissipate before the area is swept with an LEL
metre.
When abrasives are present, the additional hazard of flow line washing must be
considered.
IRP In operations where well site personnel or nearby residents have the
potential to be exposed to sour gas or fluids, the fluids must be contained
in a closed system. For Alberta, the regulation is greater than 10 ppm and
in British Columbia greater than 10 ppm (parts per million).
38 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP In operations where gas vapours are expected from produced fluid, the
hazards to on-site workers, equipment and the public must be assessed
and deemed safe before proceeding. Hold and document a hazard
assessment/JSA meeting on the site with all personnel prior to beginning
operations. The meeting should include discussion of procedures, sources
of ignition, personal protective equipment, and identification of hazardous
atmospheres. The report must be posted on the site.
IRP All open tanks shall be positioned a minimum of 50 m from the wellhead,
25 m from any flame arrested equipment and 50 m from any open flame
sources.
IRP A hazard zone of 25 m in all directions from the open tank must be
established and relayed to all persons on the site, when circulating or
pumping to an open tank system.
IRP No worker(s) shall enter the hazard zone while circulating or pumping to an
open tank system, the only exception being the pump operator or person
monitoring the tank who must be in the zone to operate the pump if fluid
transfer or circulation is required. Precautions must be taken to ensure the
safety of the personnel working within the hazardous zone, such as wind
direction flags and H2S/LEL monitoring.
NOTE: The use of an external gauge on the tank will aid in monitoring
tank levels from outside the hazard zone.
IRP Personnel responsible for monitoring the atmosphere for hazardous gases
must be trained in the selection, use, and care of detection devices.
IRP All workers involved with circulating or pumping operations to open tank
systems shall wear the appropriate PPE.
IRP All sources of ignition must be eliminated and locked out where possible.
IRP The operation shall be shut down before fluids are splashed or flowed over
the sides of the open tank system.
IRP All flows must be controlled using a device other than the wellhead wing
valve.
April 2015 39
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
IRP Physical gauging of open tank systems will only be done after the area is
proven safe by the gas detection device.
IRP Any loading/unloading of fluids from open tank systems shall be done with
the well shut in and there is no flow to the open-top tank. This can only be
done after the area is proven safe by the gas detection device.
Wind direction
Proper grounding of equipment
Safe and effective control and handling of well effluent
Ensure that all the air has been displaced from the well, after the job, before
shutting in or producing the well.
IRP Coil Tubing Operations with air can only be performed to an open top tank.
IRP Air and well effluent must not be flowed into a pressure vessel. It can only
be directed to a pressure vessel after all the air is out of the system and
the well effluent has been checked for any oxygen content. This can be
done with a gas monitor.
4.4.3 Swabbing
IRP A check valve and an additional shut-off valve must be installed on the
flow line. The shut-off valve must be closed while running in the hole if the
hole is on vacuum. Consideration should be given to using a purge
medium to follow swab cups while running in the hole.
NOTE: Check valves do not always seal 100%. The manual shut-off valve
is a backup for the check valve.
The purpose of this procedure is to prevent drawing air or the flame from the flare into
the production tank or into the tubing when running the swab cup back into the well. The
introduction of air into the system can lead to a combustible mixture. Section 4.3.15
40 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
details other considerations for the prevention of air entrainment. Where gases
produced are being flared, appropriate backflash control measures must be taken.
IRP Shut down of potential ignition sources on location, for example the rig
pump, boiler, heaters, and vaporizers, if not required for the operation,
must be considered during the swabbing of hydrocarbons.
IRP Review and/or create a JSA/hazard assessment for the proper procedure to
be performed.
IRP While swabbing to an open tank system where gas vapours are vented to
atmosphere, lease entry control must be in place.
IRP The line upstream of this choke manifold must be pressure tested to the
anticipated maximum well pressure.
IRP The flowline must have temperature and pressure data acquisition points
to mitigate the hazard of down-hole and surface hydrate conditions. This
must be discussed during the pre-job safety meeting.
IRP The bleed off line can be piped to a second separator such as a low stage
downstream of the primary separator provided its operational pressure is
reduced to near atmospheric conditions and will not have the condition impeded
by the primary separator that is handling the flow from the casing.
April 2015 41
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
IRP The possibility of running the bleed off line to a rig tank can be considered if it
meets the requirements as laid out in Section 4.4.1 Flowing or Circulating to an
Open Top Tank.
IRP All involved services must attend a documented safety meeting to review
procedures and communications protocol.
IRP A hydrometer is not an acceptable device for measuring RVP. An RVP test
must be performed by qualified personnel using equipment which meets
ASTM D323 or D5191 guidelines.
IRP Fluid produced from the wellbore must be continuously monitored for
changes until the properties have stabilized.
42 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP An ESD system must be connected to the wellhead that meets or exceeds
the wellhead design criteria.
IRP A remote LEL system shall be utilized on location to protect personnel and
equipment. Low lying areas and confined spaces shall be taken into
consideration for the proper placement of LEL detection devices.
IRP Minimum flare stack of 18.3 m (60ft.) with ignition system must be utilized
when recovering LPG fluids. Additional stack height may be required to
minimize heat radiation in forested areas or where complex terrain exists.
IRP It is recommended that a flame suppression system be utilized at the flare stack
during fracturing and flowback operations.
IRP Separators must be sized accordingly for all well effluent phases and
planned operating conditions.
IRP All essential flame generating equipment must have a remotely operated
flame suppression and/or fuel gas ESD. All essential and non-essential
flame generating equipment must be adequately distanced and/or
protected from process.
IRP Minimum heat requirements must be maintained when vapourizing fluid for
flaring and/or re-liquification process. Refer to Figure 3: Heat of
Vaporization for heat required for proper vapourization.
IRP The primary separator for initial flowback must be sized appropriately.
April 2015 43
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
IRP Liquid from the primary vessel must be handled in one of the following
ways:
NOTE: No atmospheric storage tanks may be used for the produced fluid
unless that fluid contains no LPGs.
IRP For proper vapourization of high vapour pressure fluids refer to:
Any fluids that have not had a Reid Vapour Pressure test must be treated as
high vapour pressure (HVP) fluids.
Any fluids classified as HVP must be stored in a pressurized vessel and
transported in an appropriate transport vessel as per TDG requirements.
To utilize a non-pressurized tank truck a fluid sample must be taken from the
pressurized vessel and tested to ASTM D323 or D5191. This is to ensure the
fluids are stable and do not flash off creating a hazard during transport.
IRP All PSVs on flow back equipment must be tied back into a flare system as
per Section 4.3.2.1.
44 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
4000
3500
3000
Pressure (kPa) gauge
Saturation
2500
Liquid
2000
1000
500 Seperator
0
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Temperature (°C)
April 2015 45
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
275000
Heat of Vapourization (KJ/m3)
250000
225000
200000
175000
150000
100000
75000
50000
25000
0
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210
Temperature (°C)
46 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
3000
1500
1000
500
0
15
5
25
35
45
55
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
Temperature (deg° C)
Propane Vapourization Chart Pentane Butane Isobutane Propylene/Propene
April 2015 47
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
48 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
1500
Pressure (kPa) gauge
Liquid
Saturation
1000
500
Vapour (Gas)
Region
0
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Temperature (°C)
April 2015 49
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
4500
Propene
4000
Pressure (kPa) gauge
3500 Propane
3000 Liquid
Region Butane
Iso-Butane
2500
2000
Pentane
1500
1000
50 April 2015
4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Figure 8: Propane/Methane
80% Propane
6000
Pressure (kPa)
100% Methane
4000
100% Propane
3000
2000
1000
0
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150
°C
Temperature (degC)
April 2015 51
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 Other Types of Flowbacks
The above factors are based upon atmospheric pressure, 101.3 kPa, and at ambient
temperature, 15o C, as applicable. Physical properties of LPG will vary little within the
allowed HD5 composition.
Propane Composition:
52 April 2015
4.5 Loading, Unloading and Transportation of Fluids IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
At the entrance to all sites, all personnel must put on the appropriate PPE and
report to the supervisor, complete a hazard assessment, then report to the onsite
supervisor if available, and/or assigned representative before entering the work
area.
The shipper is responsible for all shipping documents and appropriate placarding
as per TDG regulations.
It is the responsibility of the shipper and the carrier to ensure that all inspection
certificates are up to date for the vehicle and the tank hauling the fluid.
Tank specifications must meet the requirement for the fluid to be hauled and
must meet Transport Canada regulatory requirements.
It is the responsibility of the carrier that drivers are properly trained in
accordance with Section 4.5.3 Fluid Hauling Company Worker Qualifications.
All trucks should be equipped with a 30 minute SCBA.
Sweet fluids being hauled immediately after a sour load are treated as a sour
load with respect to worker safety.
Maintain all equipment valves, fittings, hoses, and hatch seals in good working
order.
Fluid hauling trucks must have function-tested intake air shut-offs as required by
wellsite spacing regulations (See IRP 20, Wellsite Design Spacing
Recommendations).
All workers are responsible for understanding and maintaining all spill
containment plans and procedures.
Prior to loading fluid from a tank ensure that the tank truck is bonded. (See
Glossary for definition).
April 2015 53
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 5 Loading, Unloading and Transportation of Fluids
IRP The properties of all produced fluids to be transported off location are to
be evaluated for:
H2S
pH
API
Salinity
Basic Sediment and Water (BS & W)
Fluid class, as required for TDG
IRP Shippers of the fluid must make or have available MSDS information for
workers. Refer to Section 4.3.9 Produced Fluids for more information.
IRP All vents must be closed and all fluid transfer lines capped while
transporting the fluid.
IRP When loading and unloading fluids from a pressurized flowback tank or
storage tank that a live well is flowing to, the following precautions must
be taken:
54 April 2015
4.5 Loading, Unloading and Transportation of Fluids IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
IRP The wheels of the tank truck must be chocked while transferring the liquids.
IRP Operators of trucks equipped with on-board scrubbers must ensure that
their units are maintained as per manufacturer’s recommendations. Refer
to Section 4.3.8 H2S Scrubbers.
IRP A closed system must be utilized for the transportation of flammable High
Reid Vapour fluids such as LPGs and NGLs.
IRP Closed systems can also be utilized to enhance the safe handling of high vapour
pressure hydrocarbons on the well site.
IRP Workers operating fluid hauling trucks must have a valid operator’s license
for the class of vehicle being driven.
April 2015 55
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling 4.4 5 Loading, Unloading and Transportation of Fluids
IRP Workers must be properly trained in the use of safety equipment used in
the course of the operation, including breathing equipment, gas detection
and explosive monitoring devices.
References/Links
Transport Canada TDG Regs, Schedule VI, Part I (Class 3, Flammable Liquids, Packing
Group Test Methods)
Transport Canada TDG Regs, Schedule VI, Part III (Class 2, Gases, Reid Vapour
Pressure, Test Methods)
56 April 2015
Appendix A: Pressure Rating and Seamless Pipe IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
P=2SEt / D-2Yt
Where:
S–is the basic allowable stress in psi, for a given material, as defined in ANSI / ASME
B31.3 Table A-1
NOTE: For the common piping materials A 53 Gr. B, A106 Gr. B, A 333
Gr. 6, A 334 Gr. 6, and API 5L Gr. B, the allowable stress below
204 Celsius (400 Fahrenheit) is 20,000 psi.
E–is the basic quality factor for longitudinal welds, as defined in ANSI / ASME B31.3
Table A – 1B
NOTE: For seamless pipe, forgings and fittings E = 1.00, and for electric
resistance welded pipe, E = 0.850
t–is the minimum pipe wall thickness, in inches. t = (tnominal x 0.875) - H, where:
tnominal – is the nominal wall thickness, in inches, of the pipe as defined in ASME
B36.10M (see table for common pipe sizes, thicknesses and diameters).
0.875 – represents the manufacturers allowable under tolerance of 12.5% for seamless
pipe.
H–is thread depth. For NPT threads, H = 0.07531ʺ up to 50.8 mm (2in) pipe, and
D–is the outside diameter, in inches (see the following table for common pipe sizes,
thicknesses and diameters)
April 2015 57
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix A: Pressure Rating and Seamless Pipe
58 April 2015
Appendix A: Pressure Rating and Seamless Pipe IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
April 2015 59
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix A: Pressure Rating and Seamless Pipe
60 April 2015
Appendix A: Pressure Rating and Seamless Pipe IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
April 2015 61
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix A: Pressure Rating and Seamless Pipe
5 5.563 40 (STD) 0.258 5.047 1678 11.57 859 5.93 2400 16.55
80(XH) 0.375 4.813 2476 17.07 1633 11.26 3500 24.13
120 0.500 4.563 3357 23.15 2485 17.13 4750 32.75
160 0.625 4.313 4268 29.43 3366 23.21 (3000*) 6050 41.71
XXH 0.750 4.063 5210 35.93 4277 29.49 (3000*) 7400 51.02
--- 1.000 3.563 11900
7197 49.62 6196 42.72 (3000*) 82.05
6 6.625 0.250 6.125 1357 9.35 676 4.66 1900 13.10
0.280 6.065 1524 10.51 840 5.79 2150 14.82
0.312 6.001 1704 11.75 1015 7.00 2400 16.55
0.375 5.875 2063 14.22 1364 9.40 2900 20.00
0.432 5.761 2391 16.49 1684 11.61 3400 23.44
0.500 5.625 2789 19.23 2070 14.27 3950 27.24
0.562 5.501 3156 21.76 2428 16.74 4450 30.68
0.719 5.189 4111 28.34 3356 23.14 (3000*) 5800 39.99
0.864 4.897 5023 34.63 4243 29.25 (3000*) 7100 48.95
1.000 4.625 5907 40.73 5102 35.18 (3000*) 8350 57.57
1.125 4.375 6745 46.51 5916 40.79 (3000*) 9600 66.19
1.250 4.125 10800
7609 52.46 6754 46.57 (3000*) 74.47
NOTE: Also refer to entire Section 4.3.2.5 Pressure Piping for maximum allowable pressure rating for line pipe.
62 April 2015
Appendix B: Production Testing Inspection Checklist IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Appendix B: Production
Testing Services Inspection
Checklist
Contractor:_________________________ Operator:____________________________
Service
Service Company Rep:_________________
Company:_____________________
Well Activity:
______________________________________________________________________________
Mark A Check if the provision is adequate. Any provision that is inadequate must
have an explanation and be corrected.
A Signs
No Smoking Designated No Vehicles or
Smoking Area Unauthorized
Persons
Designated Danger High H2S (if required)
Smoking Area Pressure
Signs with
Operator name or
phone #
B Personal Safety
Emergency Ear protection Certificate:
Response Plan a) H2S
completed
b) first aid
c) WHMIS
d) TDG
Pre-start up Safety Eye protection Fire retardant
meeting clothing
Hard hats (CSA First aid supplies Facial Hair
approved)
April 2015 63
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix B: Production Testing Inspection Checklist
64 April 2015
Appendix B: Production Testing Inspection Checklist IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
J Propane Line
Hard pipe to Blocked and leveled Bonded
vaporizer
K Tanks
Bonded to wellhead On planks Level
Valves work Valves set Tank stairs
Thief hatch Gas Blanket Tanks Purged
Vertical line in. Flames arrestor in. Flame arrestor
checked
Block valve Vertical line secured Drain at low point
Stack line clear Vertical line bonded Berm checked
Pressure alarm
L Stack (Dia. mm. X
m.
Lines clear Pilot checked Shooter tube
checked
Flare catcher Igniter checked No. of guy wires
0 – 15 meters wires 15 – 35 meters 35 – 60 meters
(3) wires (3 min.) wires (6 min.)
Correct angels 3 clamps/cable Clamps correct
flagged (1” apart) position
April 2015 65
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix B: Production Testing Inspection Checklist
S. Comments / Explanations:
Contractor: Signature
66 April 2015
Appendix C: Flare Stack Flare Rates IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
April 2015 67
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix C: Flare Stack Flare Rates
450
400
350
300
Velocity m/sec
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
68 April 2015
Appendix C: Flare Stack Flare Rates IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
450
400
350
300
Velocity m/sec
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
Gas Rate 10 3 M 3
April 2015 69
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix C: Flare Stack Flare Rates
400
350
300
Gas Velocity m/sec
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Gas Rate 103 M3
70 April 2015
Appendix C: Flare Stack Flare Rates IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
450
400
350
Gas Velocity m/sec
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Gas Rate 103 M3
April 2015 71
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix C: Flare Stack Flare Rates
450
400
350
300
Gas Velocity m/sec
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
3 3
Gas Rate 10 M
Gas Velocity m/sec Speed of sound @ 0 °C
oC
>1% H2S Gas Max Exit Velocity >1% H2S Gas Min Exit Velocity
72 April 2015
Appendix C: Flare Stack Flare Rates IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
400
350
300
250
Gas Velocity m/sec
200
150
100
50
0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
3 3
Gas Rate 10 M
April 2015 73
Appendix D: Hydrate Charts IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
While conducting tests, it becomes necessary to define, and thereby avoid, conditions
that promote the formation of hydrates. This is essential to the proper field conduct of
tests since hydrates may choke the flow string, surface lines and the well testing
equipment. Hydrate formation in the flow string would result in a lower value for
measured wellhead pressures. In a flowrate-measuring device, hydrate formation could
result in a lower or higher gas flow rate. Excessive hydrate formation may also
completely block flowlines and surface equipment.
Primary conditions:
Gas must be at or below its water dew point with free water present
Low temperature
High pressure
Secondary conditions:
High velocities
Pressure pulsations
Any type of agitation
Presence of H2S and CO2
April 2015 75
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix D: Hydrate Charts
For the purpose of well testing it is convenient to divide hydrate formation into two
categories:
If ambient temperature is low enough, ice build-up may occur on the inside of pipe when
left idle, after flowing, due to condensation residue left on the inside walls of piping
systems. This is not a hydrate, although it could lead to the formation of a hydrate by the
introduction of a hydrate crystal to the flow stream.
Programs supplied by the well owner should identify potential hydrate problems
by way of bottomhole temperatures, presence of free water, H2S and CO2
content, gas gravity, and downhole restrictions.
Pre job safety meetings should reference the possibility of hydrates.
Incorporate the primary and secondary conditions listed above.
Provision for the injection of methanol should be planned prior to flowing of the
well.
Consideration should be given to batching or injecting methanol down the tubing
and/or the annulus, if applicable, prior to flowing.
Methanol should be batched or injected into the wellhead flowline before opening
the well to flow and during any future shutdown periods so as to prevent ice
build-up on the inside walls of piping systems.
Flowlines should be purged with a gas medium (propane/N2), where available
and when extended shut down periods are anticipated, especially during cold
weather operations.
The introduction of surface heating facilities, such as line heaters, will assist in
the prevention of hydrates in surface equipment.
Staging pressure drops will assist in the prevention of hydrates in surface
equipment.
Hydrate charts/tables must be available on the well site. The well test supervisor
must be trained and competent on the use of these charts and tables.
Where hydrate formation or ice build-up is suspected in surface flow lines, the lines
must be proven to be clear by purging with methanol or a warm gas or fluid before
the lines are broken apart.
76 April 2015
Appendix D: Hydrate Charts IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
During the pressure testing procedure and start up, all non-essential workers must
vacate the surrounding area of the testing equipment, flow lines, and wellhead.
100000
In hydrate zone
10000
Pressure
(Kpa)
100
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
0
Temparture ( C)
April 2015 77
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Appendix D: Hydrate Charts
78 April 2015
Acronyms and Abbreviations IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
April 2015 79
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Acronyms and Abbreviations
80 April 2015
Glossary IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Glossary
Adequate: For the purposes of this IRP adequate is defined as the result of
conducting a hazard assessment and mitigating the risks associated with the
job to be performed.
Adequate Lighting: The visibility must be such that the worker will be able to
exit the worksite to a secure area in the event of an emergency. Flashlights,
rig lights, and vehicle lights can be considered as emergency back-up
lighting. (See Lease Lighting Guideline.)
References/Links
Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia
Saskatchewan Dept. of Labour, Occupational Health and Safety
NOTE: Regulations in the provinces of British Columbia and
Saskatchewan define lighting with specific measurement criteria.
This should be referred to when operating in these provinces.
NOTE: Consideration must be given to additional lighting on complex
operations.
Bleed Off:
Where pressure is present in the well, or piping systems, and
separating systems and needs depressurizing is required before work can
commence.
Bonding: The practice of intentionally, electrically connecting sources of
electrical charges not designed to carry electricity. This provides protection
from electrical shock during the transfer of fluids from one vessel to another.
Caution:Caution must be exercised on wells known to contain lower levels of
H2S or have harmful or toxic substances, have severe abrasives (e.g., frac
sand), have other unusual hazards and are high pressure. The term caution
does not categorize a well outside of sweet or sour. It is intended to alert
owners, employers and workers to dangers that may exceed those of routine
sweet wells and wells with minimal H2S concentration where prescriptive
equipment requirements are not provided.
Certified Pressurized Vessel:
A pressurized vessel which has been constructed
following a program of quality control, designed for the application and is
registered with the provincial agency that applies a stamp of certification on
the vessel nameplate. All vessels must have a Canadian Registration
Number (CRN) registered in all provinces of intended use.
Closed System:A closed system refers to a handling system in which the
odours or emissions from the wellbore effluent are either flared or vented to
atmosphere through an H2S scrubber, in a controlled manner.
April 2015 81
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Glossary
82 April 2015
Glossary IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
References/Links
Section 4.2.3 H2S Service Equipment Requirements
NACE MR 01-75 Latest Edition specifications
Make-up Gas: Make up gas is usually propane or sweet well gas which is used
as a purge or blanket gas to prevent oxygen getting into the flare or
incinerator for flashback control. This may be used to increase plume rise or
combustion. Make up gas is also known as blanket, purge or enrichment
gas.
Mud Can:A device used to contain fluids and direct them away from the drill
pipe when breaking connections.
Non-Certified Pressurized Vessel: A vessel that does not require certification for
use in pressure applications. The vessel must have some form of pressure
relief valve (PSV). If the tank is to be used as the primary vessel, the tank
must have been constructed under a quality control program. Construction,
design, and material specification data must be available when requested by
the well owner. Government departments may also request this data.
Caution: The vessel must be designed for its intended use.
Example: A vessel designed to operate below 103.4 kPa (15 psi) working
pressure does not require provincial certification from local
April 2015 83
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Glossary
84 April 2015
Glossary IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
April 2015 85
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling Glossary
86 April 2015
Glossary IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
References/Links
Section IRP 4.3 Well Testing
IRP 6.0 Critical Sour Underbalanced Drilling
A person who is engaged in an occupation in the service of an
Worker:
employer.
Underbalanced Drilling: Entails allowing a well to flow oil, gas, and formation
fluids to surface as it is being drilled as opposed to conventional or
overbalanced drilling where one of the prime considerations is preventing
hydrocarbons from flowing during the drilling process.
References/Links
IRP 6.0 Critical Sour Underbalanced Drilling
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Interim Directive ID94-3 and Directive 36,
Section 10, 20, 23, 24
April 2015 87
References IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
References
Alberta Energy Regulator (formerly ERCB), Guide G-37 Service Rig Inspection
Manual, 1988, ERCB, Calgary, Alberta.
AER, Directive 037 Informational Letter IL 91-2 Sour Gas Flaring Requirements
and Change to Regulations.
American Petroleum Institute (API), Recommended Practices for Drill Stem
Design and Operating Limits, Thirteenth Edition, April 1, 1989, RP7G, Dallas,
Texas
AOH&S, Well Testing – Minimum Guidelines for Enhanced Field Operations,
June 1990, Edmonton, Alberta.
AOH&S, Safety Codes Act.
AOH&S, Boiler & Pressure Vessel Exemption Order.
AOH&S, Transportation of Dangerous Goods Control Act & Regulation.
API, Recommended Practices for Occupational Safety and Health for Oil and
Gas Well Drilling and Servicing Operations First Edition, January, 1981,
RP54, Dallas, Texas.
API, Specification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment, Spec. 6A
Edition, Dallas, Texas
American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Code for Pressure Piping,
B31, Chemical and Petroleum Refinery Piping, ASME B31.3, 1990 Edition,
345 East 47th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
ASME, B16.5 Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, 1988 Edition, 345 East 47th
Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
ASME, Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Div I, 345 East 47th Street,
New York, N.Y. 10017.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Test Method for
Vapour Pressure of Petroleum Products (Reid Method), Philadelphia, PA.
ASTM, D56-79: Standard Test Method for Flash Point by Tag Closed Tester,
Philadelphia, PA.
ASTM, D93-80: Standard Test Method for Flash Point by Penski-Martens Closed
Tester, Philadelphia, P.A.
ASTM, D3278-82: Standard Test Method for Flash Point of Liquids by Setaflash
Closed Tester, Philadelphia, P.A.
April 2015 89
IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling References
90 April 2015
References IRP 4: Well Testing and Fluid Handling
Enform IRP Volume 3 Heavy Oil Sands Operations (2002) DACC, Calgary,
Alberta.
Enform IRP Volume 5 Minimum Wellhead Requirements, (2002) DACC, Calgary,
Alberta.
Enform IRP Volume 6 Critical Sour Underbalanced, (2004) DACC, Calgary
Alberta.
Enform, IRP Volume 7 Standards for Wellsite Supervision of Drilling,
Completions and Workovers (2002) DACC, Calgary, Alberta
Enform IRP Volume 15 Snubbing Operations (2007) DACC, Calgary, Alberta.
Enform IRP Volume 16 Basic Safety Awareness Training (2003),Canadian
Petroleum Safety Council, Calgary, Alberta.
Enform, IRP Volume 18 Fire and Explosion Hazard Management (2007) DACC,
Calgary Alberta.
Enform, IRP Volume 20 Wellsite Design Spacing Recommendations (2008),
DACC, Calgary, Alberta.
Enform, Lease Lighting Guideline, (2013) DACC, Calgary Alberta.
Government of Alberta, Alberta Occupational Health and Safety (AOH&S),
Alberta Occupational Health and Safety Act and Regulations, Edmonton,
Alberta.
Government of Canada, Transportation of Dangerous Good Act and Regulations
Government of Canada, WHMIS
Government of Canada, National Safety Code
National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE), MR0175 Sulphide Stress
Cracking Resistant Metallic Materials for Oilfield Equipment, Houston, Texas.
April 2015 91