Environmental Impact Assessment: NEPA: The National Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Impact Assessment: NEPA: The National Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Impact Assessment: NEPA: The National Environmental Policy Act
Assessment
1
Sec 102 – “Forcing Mechanism”
Sec. 102 (C) -- added on as a "forcing mechanism" to
see that the policy in Sec. 101 was carried out.
Required that federal agencies: “include in every …
major Federal actions significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment, a detailed
statement by the responsible official on –
(i) the environmental impact of the proposed action,
(ii) any adverse environmental effects which cannot be
avoided should the proposal be implemented,
(iii) alternatives to the proposed action,
(iv) the relationship between local short-term uses of
man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement
of long-term productivity, and
(v) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of
resources which would be involved in the proposed action
should it be implemented.”
2
Environmental Impact Statements
Environmental Impact Statement preparation is a
major step in the project implementation process.
Required for all "major federal actions significantly
affecting the environment." The project must be
major,
federal,
an action, and
have an effect on the environment that is
significant.
These terms were not defined in the original law and
have been left for agencies and the courts to define.
3
Sample Impact Statements
Most impact statements are posted
on line by the agency that prepares
the statement.
Go to agency web site and search for
environment. Some sources:
FTA Environmental Documents
http://www.fta.dot.gov/18087_ENG_HTML.htm
EPA Current Statements:
http://cfpub.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/current/
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/
4
EA or EIS?
Environmental assessments (EA) are used for
projects where it is not known if the impact is
‘significant’. In that case, an analysis needs to
be conducted of the project to determine
significance.
An EA can be as extensive as a full EIS or
more limited, if the impacts are in only a few
categories.
10
5
Action Categories
Actions can be of three types:
1) Categorical exclusions, minor actions that do
not require any environmental analysis or have
by their nature a significant impact,
2) Projects with unknown impacts that may or
may not require a full EIS, in that case and
environmental assessment (EA) takes place and
3) Significant Projects that automatically require
a full EIS. Each agency prepares a list of
example projects in each category.
11
12
6
Phases of Analysis
Scoping Process: Determine what alternatives will be
analyzed and what criteria will be used. Alternatives
include alternative technology and locations
Public participation: Identify how the affected
agencies and the public will participate and have input
in the process
Determine the affected environment: Identify
geographic area affected by the project
Analysis: Assess the impacts for each category for
each alternative.
Mitigation: If adverse impacts are expected to occur,
how will they be minimized or eliminated?
Decision making: Who decides? What alternative is
chosen?
13
Impact Categories
Impact statements or EAs should
consider all relevant impacts. This
can be an extensive list. Different
agencies have different lists
General categories:
Community Impacts
Natural Area Impacts
14
7
FTA Impact Categories (1)
Social and Economic Impacts
Land acquisition
Land use and development changes
Economic impacts
Safety and security
Visual Impacts
Air quality
Endangered species
Floodplains
15
8
Other Relevant Legislation
Environmental analysis are frequently used to
meet the requirements of other state and
federal laws and regulations: Some of the
important of these are:
Clean Air Act
Clean Water Act
Endangered Species Act
Federal Wetland Management Order (1977)
Relocation Assistance Law
Historic Preservation Act
Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act
Civil Rights Act – (Environmental Justice Order)
Sec. 4f of the Department of Transportation Act (Parkland
protection).
Americans with Disabilities Act
17
18
9
Acknowledgements
Some of this material was developed as part of work
being conducted by the Great Cities University
consortium under the lead of the University of Alabama
at Birmingham using funds provided by the Federal
Transit Administration of the U.S. Department of
Transportation.
The opinions expressed are the product of independent
university work and not necessarily those of the
sponsoring agencies or of the agencies supplying data
for the project.
19
10