Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 67 views

    Assignment 2 - Report of Failure Probability of Design

    Uploaded by

    norerny shuhada
    1. The research proposes a new methodology to design complex systems for reliability when failure data is limited. 2. The methodology evaluates specific test and field failure data scarcity for horizontal drilling equipment. 3. Key calculations presented include failure rate correction factors, typical sampling for Monte Carlo simulation, reliability models for series, parallel and k-out-of-n systems, load sharing systems, renewal equations, and determining importance measures and variance/covariance for maximum likelihood estimation of parameters.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Assignment 2 - Report of Failure Probability of Design

    Uploaded by

    norerny shuhada
    67 views11 pages
    1. The research proposes a new methodology to design complex systems for reliability when failure data is limited. 2. The methodology evaluates specific test and field failure data scarcity for horizontal drilling equipment. 3. Key calculations presented include failure rate correction factors, typical sampling for Monte Carlo simulation, reliability models for series, parallel and k-out-of-n systems, load sharing systems, renewal equations, and determining importance measures and variance/covariance for maximum likelihood estimation of parameters.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Assignment 2 - Report of failure probability of design

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The research proposes a new methodology to design complex systems for reliability when failure data is limited. 2. The methodology evaluates specific test and field failure data scarcity for horizontal drilling equipment. 3. Key calculations presented include failure rate correction factors, typical sampling for Monte Carlo simulation, reliability models for series, parallel and k-out-of-n systems, load sharing systems, renewal equations, and determining importance measures and variance/covariance for maximum likelihood estimation of parameters.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    67 views11 pages

    Assignment 2 - Report of Failure Probability of Design

    Uploaded by

    norerny shuhada
    1. The research proposes a new methodology to design complex systems for reliability when failure data is limited. 2. The methodology evaluates specific test and field failure data scarcity for horizontal drilling equipment. 3. Key calculations presented include failure rate correction factors, typical sampling for Monte Carlo simulation, reliability models for series, parallel and k-out-of-n systems, load sharing systems, renewal equations, and determining importance measures and variance/covariance for maximum likelihood estimation of parameters.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 11

    MKAR 1043 RISK ANALYSIS

    Assignment 2 (Group)

    FAILURE PROBABILITY OF DESIGN

    Name Matrix No. No. H.p


    AL’AZHARINO BIN AHMAD MKA191021 013-3462894
    CHAN KAH WAI MKA191009 011-12257099
    NORERNY SHUHADA BINTI HAMDAN MKA191014 013-2772135
    Research Article: Design for Reliability of Complex System: Case Study of Horizontal
    Drilling Equipment with Limited Failure Data

    Morteza Suleiman, Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad, Ali Rostami, and Ahmad Ghanbari


    1
    Tabriz University, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
    2
    Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz 51335-1996, Iran
    Received 11 August 2014; Accepted 30 October 2014; Published 30 November 2014
    Academic Editor: Antoine Grall

    1. Objective of the research: Propose new methodology for complex systems’ design for
    reliability.

    2. Methodology: Evaluate specific test and field failure data scarcity.

    3. Summarize of research:

    In this article, industries involved in drilling activities often face failures of their own
    drilling systems and equipment. During the drilling process, sometimes the drill bit is
    broken. This causes the downtime take too long. It happens whether to repatriate broken
    drill points and reinstall new drill points. In addition, due to excessive drilling, the
    electrical components of the drilling system will fail. All of these contribute to waste of
    time and result in losses in operating and production costs. Therefore, they want to
    evaluate a new design that is intended to be created whether it is reliable or not. The
    objective is to predict when damage and failure will occur, making replacement of the
    equipment and components involved before failure and thus reducing downtime.
    4. Summarize the Calculation

    a. Failure Rate Correction (for mechanical relay) :

    𝜆𝑝 = 𝜆𝑏 ⋅ 𝜋𝐿 ⋅ 𝜋𝐶 ⋅ 𝜋CYC ⋅ 𝜋𝐹 ⋅ 𝜋𝑄 ⋅ 𝜋𝐸 Failure per 106 hour, (1)

    i. where base failure rate (𝜆𝑏) is

    𝜆𝑏 = 0.0054 × exp [(𝑇𝐴 + 273) / 377 ]10.4 for 125ºC rated temperature,

    where 𝑇𝐴 is ambient temperature (°C).

    ii. Load stress factor (𝜋𝐿) is

    𝜋𝐿 = exp (𝑆/0.8)2 for resistive load type,


    𝑆 = (Operating Load Current / Rated Resistive Load Current).

    iii. Contact form factor (𝜋𝐶) is

    𝜋𝐶 = 1.00 for SPST contact form.

    iv. Cycling factor (𝜋CYC) is

    𝜋CYC = (cycle per hour / 10) for 10 − 1000 cycle rate.

    v. Application and construction factor (𝜋𝐹) is

    𝜋𝐹 = 12 for General purpose Application and Solenoid Construction Type.


    vi. Quality factor (𝜋𝑄) is

    𝜋𝑄 = 2.9 for commercial quality.

    vii. Environment factor (𝜋𝐸) is

    𝜋𝐸 = 44 for 𝐺𝑀 (ground, mobile) Environment.

    b. Typical sampling for 𝑘 elements in 𝑛 iterations: (Monte Carlo Simulation Method).


    Sampling of CDF of each xi (sampling size to estimate availability values)

    𝑥11, 𝑥21,..., 𝑥𝑘1 = 𝐹 (𝑥𝑖1),


    𝑥12, 𝑥22,...,2 = 𝐹 (𝑥𝑖2),
    . (2)
    .
    .
    𝑥1𝑛, 𝑥2𝑛,..., 𝑥𝑘𝑛 = 𝐹 (𝑥𝑖𝑛),

    where 𝑥𝑘𝑛 is the 𝑛th iteration of 𝑘th parameter and 𝐴(𝑡) is the availability value.

    c. The respective reliability models :

    The cumulative distribution function: (𝛿)


    The probability density function of the component strength: (𝛿),
    The load probability density function is (𝑠).
    Reliability of the series system

    (3)

    Reliability of the parallel system

    (4)

    Reliability of the 𝑘-out-of-𝑛 system

    (5)

    Where :
    d. Load- sharing system, with two same items, initially both units share the load, with
    times to failure distribution being ƒh(t).

    (6)

    e. Renewal equation:

    (7)

    Where W(t) is CIF and F(t) is CDF function.

    f. Let An be the virtual age of the system has time to the (n+1)th failure Xn+1 which is
    distributed according to the following CDF. Conditional CDF of system at age y
    shown below:

    (8)

    where F(X) is the CDF of the TTFF distribution of the system when it was new
    (underlying) distribution.
    h. For the GRP, the expected number of failures in (0, 𝑡), that is, CIF 𝑊(𝑋), is given by
    a solution of the so-called 𝐺- renewal equation:

    (9)

    where

    (𝑡), and 𝑓(𝑡) are the CDF and PDF of the TTFF (underlying) distribution.

    i. Average availability is formulated as follows:

    (10)

    h. Importance measure IRi is:

    (11)

    Where Rs(t) is reliability of the system and Ri(t) is reliability of the component i.

    j. From mathematical point of view, the reliability allo- cation problem is a nonlinear
    programming problem. It is shown as follows:

    Maximize
    (12)
    where
     Rs is system reliability, 0 ≤ Rs ≤ 1, Fs unrealibility of system
     Rj is componenet reliability of stage j, 0 ≤ Rs ≤ 1
     Rj min is lower limit on Rs
     Rj max is upper limit on Rs, bi is resources allocated to ith type of
    constraint,
     f (∙) is the system reliability function
     gi(∙) is the ith constraint function
     n is number of subsystem in the system
     m is the number of resources
    k. In this method, weighting factors for a subsystem are equal to the division of the
    failure rate of the subsystem to the sum of all subsystems failure rates of a system.
    Equation shows below:

    (13)

    where
    n is the number of subsystems
    λi is the failure rate of ith subsystems
    λ* is the required failure rate of system
    λi* is the allocated failure rate for ith subsystems
    wi is the weighting factors

    l. Determination of variance and covariance of the MLE parameters matrix is obtained


    by the inverse of Fisher matrix:

    (14)
    5. Calculation Report

    Equation No. Discussions / Opinion


    1 The limit state function of the operation failure probability. This equation
    represent the various function of operation which can contributes to the
    failure rate of the electromechanical. Hence this equation can give results
    on how much the electromechanical relay for every 106 hour needed.
    2 The failure rate of a system or component fails which expressed failures
    per unit of time. This function is in the normal distribution form which can
    give the exact time where the mechanical failure predicted to happen.
    3 Load stress factor is expressed in Rayleigh distribution whereby it has
    equal variance with zero mean. In this case, the load stress is represented
    with operating load current and the resistive load current at the same time
    during the drilling work.
    4 Function with a constant value contact form factor 1.00 for single pole
    single throw (SPST) in one circuit which has the single ON position.
    5 Factor which represented with the number of drilling equipment cycles
    operate for an hour
    6 Constant value = 12, for application and construction factor for general
    purpose application and Solenoid construction type
    7 Constant value = 2.9 for common quality of commercial mechanical driller
    8 Constant value = 44 which represent the environment factor based on the
    ground condition (fixed environment disturbance) or any mobile (moving
    disturbance) from surrounding
    9 Monte Carlo Simulation Method that can simulate million values of
    sampling value, x at different parameters. It can give the area of
    probability value at different range of samples required.
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14

    You might also like