Chloride Vs Conductivity PDF
Chloride Vs Conductivity PDF
Chloride Vs Conductivity PDF
net/publication/259641651
CITATIONS READS
7 6,180
7 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
CARACTERIZACIÓN DE UN PREDIO AGRÍCOLA MEDIANTE TOMOGRAFÍA DE RESISTIVIDAD ELÉCTRICA Y ANÁLISIS FISICOQUÍMICO DEL SUELO View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Omar Delgado-Rodríguez on 28 May 2014.
research note
Abstract
Key words: Archie’s Law, chlorides, electrical conductivity, resistivity, vertical electrical
sounding (VES).
zzo, 2000). VESs and hydrochemical data have relation to hydrogeology studies, including stud-
been used to examine the degree of intrusion of ies of rocks with silt and clay areas.
salt water in aquifers (Edet and Okereke, 2001;
Kouzana et al., 2010) The Río Sinaloa Valley is a wide coastal plain
whose subsoil shows freshwater and saltwater
Archie (1942) found the following relation between bodies. The region is formed by a landscape
the resistivities of brine saturated sand (Ro) and composed of a smooth relief closely related to
brine (Rw) when he studied oil on clean sands the origin and nature of the rocks’ formation.
saturated by brine: The oldest rocks composing the geological
R0 basement are made up of shales and cherts. Tuff
F= , and sandstone formations and stratified and ce-
Rw mented conglomerates overlie these rocks. The
where F is the formation factor; Ro is the resis- subsoil plain was formed by a large sediment
tivity of the saturated formation; and Rw is the accumulation, reaching thicknesses greater than
resistivity of the pore water. When the materials 500 meters in the central valley and diminishing
are not clean sands, the calculated formation toward the Western Sierra Madre. The current
factor is called the apparent formation-factor delta plain is composed of gravel, sands, silt and
(Fa). Several authors (Norzagaray-Campos et al., clay deposited in deltas (CNA, 2002). The static
2002; Grellier et al., 2007; Peinado-Guevara et aquifer water level in the area varies between
al., 2009) have successfully applied the Archie´s 0.5 and 8 m (Figure 1).
This study aims to generate a tool for estimating aquifer water (electrical conductivity and chloride
the chloride concentration in the underground concentration). The five remaining VESs were
water of the Guasave region, Sinaloa, Mexico, performed at sites without wells to verify the
using subsoil resistivity values obtainned from applicability of the method.
VES method, and the relation between the EC and
the chloride concentration in the water based on The apparent resistivity (ra) versus the AB/2
the statistical analysis of the parameters obtained function is obtained by implementing the
in wells. device mentioned above. The subsoil resistiv-
ity can be obtained from field data; therefore,
it is assumed that the subsoil is stratified in
Materials and methods horizontal, homogeneous and isotropic layers
in regard to the electrical resistivity (Orellana,
A total of 1,358 water well samples from different 1982). In other words, the VESs allow readings
locations of the Guasave municipality were used of electrical currents and voltage differences in
to determine the Cl- and EC concentrations. From the field. These readings are transformed into
the total analyzed samples, 66 were collected apparent electrical resistivity values, providing
and analyzed in October 2008, corresponding the true electrical resistivity of the subsoil by
to wells for domestic use; 44 correspond to the inverse numeric modeling methods assuming
western portion of the Sinaloa river and 12 to the the geological medium composed of horizontal,
eastern portion (Figure 1). Information regard- homogeneous and isotropic layers. The theoreti-
ing the 1,292 remaining samples (period 1980- cal solution of this problem consists in solving
2005) was provided by the Comisión Nacional the Laplace equation with boundary conditions.
del Agua. The geographic coordinates of each The data on apparent resistivity from each VES
well were determined using a portable Garmin collected in the field were modeled with the
eTrex H GPS. program Resix-Plus version 1.31 (Advanced
Geosciences, Inc, U.S.A., 1992), which was
The chloride concentrations of the water samples used to process the data by an algorithm based
were determined by silver nitrate tritation at on the method of successive approximations
the laboratory of the Departamento de Aguas or interactions until the best mathematical
Subterráneas from District 063 of the Comisión response or solution to the curve of the data
Nacional del Agua. The EC was determined of apparent resistivity was reached, by which
in the field using a Hanna conductivity meter the true subsoil resistivity was obtained. The
(model HI98130, Hanna Instruments, Instruction resistivity (Ro) of saturated thickness is obtained
Manual HI 98129 and HI 98130. http://www.han- by modeling the processing of VES and cor-
nainst.es/catalogo/fichas/m_98129-98130.pdf). relating it with pore water resistivity (Rw) by
The water samples correspond to the aquifer a linear function. Models of linear, polynomial
formation, as they were obtained during the and potential regression were used to relate the
pumping of the wells. EC with the Cl- concentration.
Thirty-four VESs were conducted using the Seven 4 m-deep drills were made to colect soil
Schlumberger array with a maximum spacing samples. The subsoil samples were extracted at
of the current electrodes of AB/2 = 50 m (Orel- different depths and were subject to a drying
lana, 1982). Twenty-nine of the VES arrays were and homogenization process to determine their
placed near a well, contrasting the values of the texture (silts, sands and clay content) by the
subsoil resistivity with the characteristics of the Bouyoucos method.
VOLUME 39 Nº1 JANUARY - APRIL 2012 233
Figure 5. Water electrical conductivity vs chloride concentration. a) Fits for 1358 samples collected from 1980 to 2008, b)
Fits only for the 66 samples collected in 2008.
The 1358 analized samples correspond to the Cl- concentration, which is the linear model,
Guasave municipality, Sinaloa; therefore, the because it is a simple application. Because Rw
range corresponding to the values of the EC is and EC are inversely proportional, and by a unit
wider, with values between 0.15 dS m-1 and 95 conversion, the equation is:
dS m-1 and with a chloride concentration of 0.5
meq L-1 at 900 meq L -1. The relation obtained (8)
for the water samples analyzed in the 66 wells
in October 2008 corresponds to the area under The results obtained by applying equation (8) are
study, with values varying between 0.18 and 8.08 presented in column 9 of Table 2, where the 29
dS m-1 for the EC and 0.6 meq L-1 at 40 meq L-1 VESs can be observed with the corresponding
for the chloride concentration. Rw, EC and Cl- values and the corresponding
values calculated from Ro.
Finally, the water EC and chloride concentrations
were calculated based on the results obtained from The Rw and Cl- values determined by electrical
the five VESs (saturated thickness resistivity (Ro)) measurements were correlated by the values deter-
at the sites without drilling and using relations mined in the field (Rw) and laboratory (Cl-), showing
(5), (6) and (7). The Rw value was obtained us- a considerable dispersion in regard to the identity
ing equation 1 and the water EC as the inverse expected Y=X (Figure 6). The correlation between
of the Rw. Equation 6 was used to estimate the the Rw and Cl- values measured and calculated is
VOLUME 39 Nº1 JANUARY - APRIL 2012 235
Table 2. Comparison between parameters Rw, EC and Cl- determined in the laboratory and calculated from measurements
of electrical resistivity.
Coordinates Measured Calculate
RO Rw EC Cl- EC Cl-
VES East North (ohm-m) (ohm-m) (dS m-1) (meq L-1) Rw (ohm-m) (dS m-1) (meq L-1)
1 753371 2827530 27.6 9.7087 1.03 6.4 13.7722 0.7261 3.6
2 754177 2827355 35 11.1111 0.9 2.4 16.932 0.5906 2.9
3 754342 2826767 89 34.4828 0.29 2 39.99 0.2501 1.2
4 755202 2824048 18.6 12.5 0.8 2.6 9.9292 1.0071 5
5 756563 2826061 29.3 12.1951 0.82 3.6 14.4981 0.6897 3.4
6 751213 2828331 17.3 7.1942 1.39 5 9.3741 1.0668 5.3
7 749540 2826163 9.8 4.329 2.31 7.6 6.1716 1.6203 8
8 748447 2842366 7.9 4.329 2.31 14 5.3603 1.8656 9.2
9 749141 2840885 9.1 5.848 1.71 10 5.8727 1.7028 8.4
10 748361 2839944 4.4 3.2051 3.12 22 3.8658 2.5868 12.7
11 748098 2838923 17 5.618 1.78 10.8 9.246 1.0815 5.3
12 748130 2837838 14.7 7.4627 1.34 9 8.2639 1.2101 6
13 748780 2837301 12.2 12.3457 0.81 4 7.1964 1.3896 6.8
14 750155 2835871 17.7 8.6957 1.15 5.6 9.5449 1.0477 5.2
15 753959 2834461 13.1 11.9048 0.84 4.8 7.5807 1.3191 6.5
16 752741 2835073 100 55.5556 0.18 2 44.687 0.2238 1.1
17 756946 2821707 16.8 12.1951 0.82 3 9.1606 1.0916 5.4
18 759204 2822998 2.3 1.992 5.02 20 2.9691 3.368 16.6
19 757726 2825404 23.4 12.0482 0.83 3.6 11.9788 0.8348 4.1
20 756976 2827402 27.8 10.8696 0.92 3.4 13.8576 0.7216 3.6
21 757488 2827872 14.9 6.5359 1.53 3.4 8.3493 1.1977 5.9
22 748010 2830201 25.6 20.8333 0.48 2.6 12.9182 0.7741 3.8
23 747412 2830762 14.3 7.4074 1.35 8 8.0931 1.2356 6.1
24 746509 2831053 15.5 14.9254 0.67 4 8.6055 1.162 5.7
25 744133 2832380 3.8 7.8125 1.28 9.6 3.6096 2.7704 13.7
26 745854 2835272 6.9 4.4444 2.25 15.4 4.9333 2.027 10
27 757217 2830041 40.4 15.625 0.64 2.2 19.2378 0.5198 2.6
28 756999 2831404 43.6 11.236 0.89 3.4 20.6042 0.4853 2.4
29 752596 2833660 20.1 14.7059 0.68 2.6 10.5697 0.9461 4.7
observed in Figure 6. The location of sites with VES according to Palacios et al. (1997). The degrees
points without drilling is shown in Table 3, which of restriction for irrigation water are observed in
helped to determine the Ro value, which was used Figure 7; with a higher effect in both parameters
as a reference to determine the Rw, EC and Cl-. of the East side of the Sinaloa River. In regard to
the ion chloride concentration and the ground-
The effect of salinity and the chloride concentra- water electrical conductivity, the water quality
tion on usable water in cultivation was analyzed, to the east side of Sinaloa river is more saline,
236 ciencia e investigación agraria
Table 3. Rw values (obtained from resistivity of saturated depth), electrical conductivity and chloride concentrations.
Coordinates Rw EC [Cl-]
Ro
VES (ohm-m) (dS m-1) (meq L-1)
East North (ohm-m)
Ec. 1 Ec. 8 Ec. 6
30 754098 2831998 16 8.82 1.13 5.59
31 744999 2821205 9.4 6.00 1.67 8.21
32 744265 2836239 7.8 5.31 1.88 9.27
33 743629 2835038 9.87 6.20 1.61 7.95
34 753500 2824016 10.16 6.32 1.58 7.79
with chloride concentrations higher than to the fit for the linear, polynomial, and potential models,
west, which is an indicator for new drill planning with R fit values higher than 0.94. Consequently,
considering the use of water, as well as the vul- an approximation of the chloride concentration is
nerability of zones near the portions considered possible with only the groundwater EC value. The
as water for irrigation, because overexploitation gradient of the linear model for the relation [Cl-]
of water may increase the contaminated area. against EC shows that the gradient tends to increase
as the chloride concentration increases (Figure 5).
The linear regression model between the groundwater
electrical conductivity and the chloride concentra- Finally, this work presents a rapid, reliable, and
tions proposed in this work for the 1358 samples is economical technique to estimate the concentra-
very similar to the results by Abyaneh et al. (2005): tion of chloride ions and the water EC, regardless
[Cl-] = 9 EC for 0.15<EC<39.9 dS m-1. The relation of drilling location around Guasave. Therefore,
in this work is [Cl-] =9.22 EC, for 0.15<EC<95 application of this method may result in more
dS m-1. On the other hand, the linear model [Cl-] successful drilling in search of fresh water.
= 4.928 EC, for 0.18<EC<8.08 dS m-1, for the 66
samples corresponding to the area under study
and collected in 2008, is also similar to the linear Acknowledgments
model proposed by Hajrasuliha et al. (1991): [Cl-]
= 5.22 EC, for EC=16 dS m-1. The different models To Comisión Nacional del Agua and Instituto
presented, where the water electrical conductivity de Geología of UNAM, for providing help for
was related to the chloride concentration, show good this work.
VOLUME 39 Nº1 JANUARY - APRIL 2012 237
Figure 7. Water restriction degree for agriculture according to (a) electrical conductivity and (b) concentration of chloride ion.
Resumen
por último, la concentración del ión cloruro mediante la ecuación expuesta anteriormente para
el área de estudio. Siguiendo el mismo procedimiento, en los cinco SEV restantes efectuados en
lugares donde no hay perforaciones, se pudo estimar la resistividad eléctrica de la capa saturada
(Ro), la resistividad eléctrica del agua del acuífero (Rw, y su inverso EC) y la concentración del
ión cloruro, sin requerir el uso de una técnica destructiva.
Palabras clave: Cloruros, conductividad eléctrica, Ley de Archie, resistividad, sondeo eléctrico
vertical (SEV).
Nacional de Ingeniería del Servicio de Conser- Laboratorio de Salinidad de los Estados Unidos
vación de Suelos. Departamento de Agricultura de América. Departamento de Agricultura de los
de los Estados Unidos de América. Comisión E.U.A., edit. LIMUSA. México. D.F. 172 pp.
Nacional del Agua. Edo de México, México. Sosa, D., and R. Palazzo. 2000. Los estudios de
405 pp. prospección geoeléctrica por corriente continua
Peinado-Guevara, H., J. Herrera-Barrientos, and M. en la llanura argentina. In: A. Olmo and J.A.
Ladrón de Guevara. 2009. Determinación de la López-Geta (eds.). Actualidad de las técnicas
conductividad hidráulica mediante medidas de geofísicas aplicadas en hidrogeología. IGME,
resistividad eléctrica. Ingeniería Hidráulica en Madrid, España. p. 133 – 139.
México XXIV (4): 123-134. WHO. 2003. Chloride in drinking-water. Background
Reluy, F.V., J.M. de Paz-Bécares, R.D. Zapata, and document for preparation of WHO Guidelines
J. Sánchez. 2004. Development of an equation for drinking-water quality. Geneva, World Health
to relate electrical conductivity to soil and water Organization (WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/3). 9 pp.
salinity in a Mediterranean agricultural environ- Xu, M., and Y. Eckstain. 1997. Statistical analysis of
ment. Aust. J. Soil Res 42: 381-388. the relationships between dispersivity and other
Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnóstico y rehabilitación de physical properties of porous media. Hydrogeol-
suelos salinos y sódicos. Manual 60. Personal del ogy Journal 5: 4-20.
View publication stats