Scribd
Upload
179 views

Shoring

This document provides the design of a sheet pile wall and flagpole footing based on building codes. It includes input parameters, analysis, and checks of the pile section forces, flexural and axial capacity, shear capacity, and required embedment length. The analysis determines the pile is adequate with an embedment length of 20.51 feet. It also provides the design of an unrestrained 3.666667 foot diameter by 20.51 foot deep concrete footing for a 104.23 kip flagpole.

Uploaded by

ARUN RAWAT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
179 views

Shoring

This document provides the design of a sheet pile wall and flagpole footing based on building codes. It includes input parameters, analysis, and checks of the pile section forces, flexural and axial capacity, shear capacity, and required embedment length. The analysis determines the pile is adequate with an embedment length of 20.51 feet. It also provides the design of an unrestrained 3.666667 foot diameter by 20.51 foot deep concrete footing for a 104.23 kip flagpole.

Uploaded by

ARUN RAWAT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

PROJECT :

CLIENT :
JOB NO. : DATE :
Sheet Pile Wall Design Based on 2018 IBC / 2019 CBC / ACI 318-19
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
HEIGHT OF CANTILEVER Hcant = 10 ft
SURCHARGE WEIGHT ws = 500 psf
ALLOWABLE LATERAL SOIL-BEARING PRESSURE IN EMBEDMENT
Pp = 300 psf / ft
LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 35 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure)
SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING PE = 450 psf / ft (for Hcant > 12 ft only)

SOIL SPECIFIC WEIGHT gb = 110 pcf


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc ' = 4 ksi
VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 44 in
PILE SPACING S = 4.0333 ft, o.c.
PILE VERT. REINF. 16 # 11
LATERAL REINF. OPTION (0=Spirals, 1=Ties) 1 Ties
LATERAL REINFORCEMENT # 6 @ 8 in o.c.

THE SHORING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.


( Hembd = 20.51 ft. Min. Req'D)

ANALYSIS
DETERMINE PILE SECTION FORCES AT CANTILEVER BOTTOM
Hb = 0.5 S Pa (Hcant)2 = 7.06 kips, ASD
Hs = ws S Pa (Hcant) / gb = 6.42 kips, ASD
HE = 0.5 S PE (Hcant) =
2
90.75 kips, ASD
P = S D ws + 0.25 p gc D Hcant =
2
23.23 kips, ASD
V = Hb + HE + Hs = 104.23 kips, ASD
M = (Hb /3 + 2HE /3 + Hs /2 ) Hcant = 520.1 ft-kips, ASD

Pu = 1.2 P = 27.88 kips, SD


Vu = 1.6 V = 166.76 kips, SD
Mu = 1.6 M = 832.1 ft-kips, SD

CHECK PILE LIMITATIONS


fc ' = 4 ksi > 4 ksi [Satisfactory]
D= 44 in > MAX[( Hcant + Hembd) / 30 , 12 in] [Satisfactory]
CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY

      2 
  f C'  2   c     c   , for 0   c   o
e
 fC    o    o  
 '
  e f C , for  c   o


2 ef C
'
 fy  ty , for c
 o  ,  ty  , t  
Ec Es  ty  0.003 ,
'
E c  57 f C , E s  29000ksi ,  e  0.85 ,  cu
5000

4000
Note:
3000 1. Between compression & tension co
f Pn (k) Transition, which the f should be b
2000
interpolation. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2
1000 2. ACI 318-19 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2
e (22.2.2.4.1) and cu (Fig. R21.2.
0
But AISC 360/341-16 has different
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
e (1.0 or 0.7).
-1000

-2000

Solid Black Line - Tension Controlled f Mn (ft-k)


Solid Red Line - Transition f Mn = 1706 ft-kips @ Pu =
Dash Line - Compression Controlled

CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY


f Vn = f (Vs + Vc) = 312 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
> Vu [Satisfactory]
where f = 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)
A0 = 1228 in2. Av = 0.88 in2. fy = 60
Vc = 2 (fc') A0 =
0.5
155.4 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5)
Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 8 (fc')0.5A0) = 261.0 kips, (ACI 318-19 22.5.1)
smax = 12 (IBC 1810.3.9.4.2) sprovd = 8
smin = 1
rs = 0.12 fc' / fyt = 0.008 < rs,provd = 0.008 [Satisfactory] (ACI 318-19 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)

DETERMINE PILE EMBEDMENT LENGTH, Hembd, (IBC 1807.3)


By trials, use pole depth, d = Hembd = 20.51 ft
Lateral bearing @ bottom, S3 = 2 Pp Min( d , 12' ) = 7.20 ksf
Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S1 = 2 Pp Min( d / 3 , 12' ) = 4.10 ksf
Require Depth is given by
A 4.36h 
d 1  1   for nonconstrained 
2 A  20.51 ft [Satisfactory]

Where P=V = 104.23 kips


A= 2.34 P / (D S1) = 16.21
h =M / V = 4.99 ft
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

(IBC Table 1808.8.1)


(IBC 1810.3.5.2)
c 
2

  , for 0   c   o  s E s , for  s   ty
o  , fS
 f y , for  s   ty
o
fy  ty , for compression controlled
, t  
Es  ty  0.003 , for tension controlled
000ksi ,  e  0.85 ,  cu  0.003
(cont'd)

compression & tension controlled is


n, which the f should be by linear
on. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2.2 & Fig. R10.4.2.1)
9 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2b) and keeps
.4.1) and cu (Fig. R21.2.2a) the same.
360/341-16 has different f (0.9 only) and

28 kips > Mu
[Satisfactory]

ksi

in
[Satisfactory]
19 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)
PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 0 no P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 104.23 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h= 4.989739 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b= 3.666667 ft h
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.3 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 09 1806.3.4) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> d = 20 ft

Use 3.66666666666667 ft dia x 20.51 ft deep footing unrestrained @ ground level d

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  d , 12 ' 


LATERAL BEARING @ d/3 : d 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
3 
2.34 P
A
bS 1
A 4.36h 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
REQUIRD DEPTH : 2  A 
d 
 4.25 Ph , FOR CONSTRAINED
 bS 3

NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 104.23 k 104.23 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h => 5.0 ft 5.0 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b => 3.67 ft 3.67 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.60 ksf / ft 0.60 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY d1 => 20.00 ft 20.00 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.00 ksf 4.00 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.63 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.95 ft 9.15 ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY d2=> 20.47 ft 14.57 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.09 ksf 2.91 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.24 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.54 ft 9.15 ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY d3=> 20.51 ft 11.86 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.37 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.12 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.22 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.52 ft 9.20 ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY d4=> 20.51 ft 10.53 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.11 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 6.32 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.21 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.51 ft 9.77 ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY d5=> 20.51 ft 10.15 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.10 ksf 2.03 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 6.09 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 16.21 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 20.51 ft 9.95 ft

You might also like