Direct Current Voltage Gradient Survey - Operator Response To Notice - 10272014 PDF
Direct Current Voltage Gradient Survey - Operator Response To Notice - 10272014 PDF
Direct Current Voltage Gradient Survey - Operator Response To Notice - 10272014 PDF
lttr~:1
I)
October 27, 2014 '/J
Allan Beshore
Director, Central Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
901 Locust Street, Suite 462
Kansas City, MO 64106-2641
The DCVG survey was completed July 21, 2014 for the entire length,
approximately 21 miles of pipeline . The survey indicates the line
segment not jeeped between station numbers 720+00 to 729+00 has
coating in good condition. All locations identified, listed as "minor" will
be monitored for adequate levels of cathodic protection in accordance
with NACE RPO 169-2007.
Connections
for America's
Energym
80 1 Cherry Street P: (817) 339-5498
Respectfully,
Crestwood Dakota Pipelines LLC
Alice Ratcliffe
Pipeline Compliance Manager
Connections
for America's
Energy~
PROPOSED COMPLIANCE ORDER
Pursuant to 49 United States Code§ 60118, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA} proposes to issue to Crestwood Dakota Pipelines
LP a Compliance Order incorporating the following remedial requirements to
ensure the compliance of Crestwood Dakota Pipelines LP with the pipeline safety
regulations:
2. Provide the plan and action schedule within 60 days from the date of receipt of
the Final Order.
3. Implement the plan and schedule required by items 1, above, within 90 days
from the date of receipt of the Final Order.
c!~?E~Y!22~~
Report
Direct Current Voltage Gradient Survey (DCVG)
21 Miles of 10"0 Pipe- Epping, ND
October 6, 2014
MATCOR, Inc.
101 Liberty Lane
Chalfont PA 18914
Page 1 of 13
~matcor
Direct Current Voltage Gradient Survey
(DCVG) REPORT
CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP
Experts in Corrosion Prevention
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION 3
4. EQUIPMENT USED 7
5. SURVEY PROCEDURE 9
6. CATEGORIZATION 11
7. OBSERVATIONS 11
8. RECOMMENDATIONS 13
1. Introductio n
A direct current voltage gradient is generated by direct current flowing through the soil
to a defect in the coating from a source of direct current power such as a rectifier or
temporary power source. The magnitude of the voltage gradient is determined by Ohms
Law (E=IR), where E is the voltage gradient, I is the current flow through the soil
between the measuring electrodes and R is the resistance of the soil circuit between the
measuring electrodes.
Generally the larger the voltage gradient the larger the coating defect, but soil
resistivity and current attenuation must be considered in the interpretation of the
magnitude of the voltage gradient. DCVG surveys do not indicate the level of cathodic
protection on a pipeline system.
Traditionally DCVG surveys have been undertaken with an instrument that amplifies the
DC voltage between two half cells in contact with the ground and displays the voltage
gradient as a millivolt value on an analog meter. Most analog DCVG survey instruments
do not store the voltage gradients measured or the location of the voltage gradients
indicating defects in the pipeline coating . The defects are marked with stakes or flags
and a table produced of the location and size of the defect as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Modern DCVG survey equipment (see Figure 2 for example) is equipped with data
logging facility as well as a GPS engine to store coordinates. By storing the voltage
gradient values and stamping them with the latitude and longitude, chaining each
voltage gradient is unnecessary and any spreadsheet software can produce accurate
graphs of the data.
A positive value for delta V, given the polarities of the data-probes and their
positioning relative to the pipe, indicates that net current is flowing to the pipe,
which is cathodic condition. Whereas, negative value for delta V, indicates that
net current is flowing away the pipe, which is an anodic condition . See Figure 3
for sample DCVG survey report .
....
- OCYG 0.3
OCVGLM---{
.0.2
MAIN DCVG B
4. Equipment Used
The McMiller Gx Data-Logger (see Figure 4) was used to complete the DCVG
Survey.
Data Version 11
Survey Type DCVG
Rectifier Mode Cycle ON/OFF
Cane Button Allowed To -- DCP Accept -> Save
Cane Button Allowed To- Survey Read Read
Survey Walking Direction Increasing
Use Ohm*cm y
Max. acceptable Far and Near Ground Reading Difference% 5
AC System 60Hz
Maximum Acceptable Low Voltage 9999
Auto Log GPS at Flags y
DCVG Defect Max mV =1st read of Tot mV y
Auto Log GPS Interval Every Reading
Max POOP 3
Submeter GPS Installed y
Use Submeter GPS y
CIS Flag Read Count% 20
Distance per reading (ft.) 5
Distance between Flags (ft.) 100
Name of P/L lnergy
Current Station 269+15.0000
Time To Walk Between Flags In Sees . 45
Enable Auto Learn y
Auto Pace y
Number of Data Probes Two
Location Style Station Number
Technician Name -
Date I time 7/21/2014 8:06
Read Mode On/Off Pairs (DSP mode)
Range 5.7 V DC- 400 MO
Moving Average Samples 4
Rectifier Cycle On Time 700
Rectifier Cycle Off Time 300
GPS Sync On Read Delay 150
GPS Sync Off Read Delay 150
GPS Sync Downbeat Each Minute
GPS Sync Cycle Start= On->Off y
5. Survey Procedure
Anode bed
D Rectifier
lnterrupte r.......,.. l
0o.. ····· QTest Post
U/G PIPELINE
Figure 5: Coated pipeline under survey with anode bed and rectifier
6. Categorization
Survey indications were classified using the most conservative criterion as shown
below:
Moderate
Tool/Environment
21-40
Medium IR drop
Direct current voltage and/or neutral
gradient survey, conditions at
similar conditions indication when CP is
off
7. Observations
Upon analysis of DCVG Survey, %IR drop coating anomalies are summarized as
follows:
Station
%1R Drop Comments
No
23335 2.787526 DCVG 1
26980 2.102132 DCVG 2
43780 2.49314 DCVG 3
66705 3.779999 DCVG4
108175 1.874985 DCVG 5
4 3.78
3 ~ ~n
c.
0
....
c 2
a::
~
0
ll) 0 0 ll) ll)
m 00 00 0 r--
m en r-- r-- .-1
m <.D m <.D 00
0J 0J '<!' <.D 0
.-1
STATION#
8. Recommendations
4. One location per pipeline segment should be scheduled for direct examination
validation dig to confirm validity of survey.