Detailed Estimate

Reservoir Sizing Planning and Design WS
Annex 1
Name of Sub-Project Err:509

Sub-project Type Spring Development
Barangay Bazar
Municipality Sal-lapadan
Province Abra
Region CAR
I -DESIGN OF RESERVOIR:
A. Reason for installing a reservoir

To balance the supply and demand in the system, pressure breaker, fire hydrant reserve, settling or point of
disinfection.
Source discharge = 0.800 lps. Average Source Flow (ASF)
Demand (users) = 0.243 lps. Average Day Demand (ADD)
B. Location of the reservoir

Invert elevation = 320 m. (from plan and survey data)
Reason for choosing the location.

The reservoir is lower than the spring and generally higher than the distribution areas.
C. Capacity of the reservoir
Criteria:
Particular Description
Number of Household Actual number of household beneficiaries
Average Household Member 6 members
Total Population (No. of HH)(Ave. HH Member)
Average Population Growth Rate Percent annualy
Design Lifespan No. of years
Design Population (Total Popln)(1+PGR)^life span
Average Daily Water Demand liters per capita per day
per Capita per Day
Average Daily Demand (ADD) (Design population)(ADWD/capita/day)
Average Demand per Second ADD/(24x60x60)
Consumption Standards 30 to 60 lps per capita per day demand for level 2
Design Period 5-15 years
Reservoir capacity:
1) By rule of thumb
Reservoir capacity = 1/4 (ADD)

= ADD/(4x1000)
= 5.24 cu.m.
2) By theory
Reservoir capacity = (Demand-Supply)(Ave. Day Length)

= (ADD-ASF)(60)(60)(12)/1000
= (24.08) cu.m.
3) Considering spring flow (80%)
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----1of 2

Reservoir capacity = (Spring discharge)(Ave. Day Length)

= (ASF)(60)(60)(12)/1000
= 34.56 cu.m.
4) Adopted result
Reservoir capacity = 5.24 cu.m.
5) Reason for adoption

Use an average reservoir capacity which could meet the demand for the design period
and minimal investment cost consideration.
6) Reservoir dimension
Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 1.74 cum

Existing Reservoir
Length 1.74 = 1.74 m. 3.00 m.
Breadth 1.74 = 1.74 m. 3.00 m.
Height 1.74 = 2.04 m. 3.00 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10
Therefore width length height

Use Existing reservoir dimension = 3.00 3.00 3.00
Actual reservoir capacity = 24.30 cu.m.
Note: dimension is INSIDE DIMENSION. 19.06 if + answer the size is OK

ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Simple Ratio Method
Calculate the ratio (R) of the average source flow (ASF) (for spring sources) over the
Average Day Demand and refer to the table below:
R = ASF ÷ ADD TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS
Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

< 1.0 inadequate source
1.0-2.0 ½ of the average daily used
2.0-3.0 ¼ of the average daily used
3.0-4.0 1/8
of the average daily used
> 4.0 no storage facility required 3.29708
Note: The source above in the sample is inadequate and to balance the demand and supply-the minimum
required hours to fill a balancing reservoir is 8.44 hours
DEMAND-SUPPLY ANALYSIS BASED ON THE AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND (ADD)
DEFICIT(__)
YEAR DEMAND SUPPLY RESERVOIR SURPLUS
1 17,617.50 69120 24,300.00 75,802.50
2 17,837.72 69120 24,300.00 75,582.28
3 18,060.69 69120 24,300.00 75,359.31
4 18,286.45 69120 24,300.00 75,133.55
5 18,515.03 69120 24,300.00 74,904.97
6 18,746.47 69120 24,300.00 74,673.53
7 18,980.80 69120 24,300.00 74,439.20
8 19,218.06 69120 24,300.00 74,201.94
9 19,458.28 69120 24,300.00 73,961.72
10 19,701.51 69120 24,300.00 73,718.49
11 19,947.78 69120 24,300.00 73,472.22
12 20,197.13 69120 24,300.00 73,222.87
13 20,449.59 69120 24,300.00 72,970.41
14 20,705.21 69120 24,300.00 72,714.79
15 20,964.03 69120 24,300.00 72,455.97
Note: Recommendation is to look for additional water source or decrease water consumption per capita
per day or reduce household to be served etc…can no longer increase size of tank since beyond 12 hours fillin
MASS DIAGRAM METHOD OF ANALYSIS (RESERVOIR SIZING) FROM WATER DEMAND VARIATION:
HOURLY CUMULATIVE
DEMAND HOURLY DEMAND SUPPLY SUPPLY MINUS
TIME ADD RATIO (liters) (liters) (liters/hour) DRAFT (liters)
1 - - - 2,880.00 2,880.00
2 0.38 331.93 331.93 2,880.00 2,548.07
3 0.39 340.67 672.60 2,880.00 2,539.33
4 0.33 288.26 960.85 2,880.00 2,591.74

5 0.48 419.28 1,380.13 2,880.00 2,460.72

6 0.95 829.83 2,209.96 2,880.00 2,050.17
7 1.93 1,685.86 3,895.82 2,880.00 1,194.14
8 2.06 1,799.41 5,695.23 2,880.00 1,080.59
9 1.98 1,729.53 7,424.76 2,880.00 1,150.47
10 1.58 1,380.13 8,804.89 2,880.00 1,499.87
11 1.89 1,650.92 10,455.81 2,880.00 1,229.08
12 1.29 1,126.82 11,582.63 2,880.00 1,753.18
13 1.23 1,074.41 12,657.03 2,880.00 1,805.59
14 0.95 829.83 13,486.86 2,880.00 2,050.17
15 0.99 864.77 14,351.62 2,880.00 2,015.23
16 0.96 838.56 15,190.19 2,880.00 2,041.44
17 1.07 934.65 16,124.83 2,880.00 1,945.35
18 1.33 1,161.76 17,286.59 2,880.00 1,718.24
19 1.36 1,187.96 18,474.55 2,880.00 1,692.04
20 0.87 759.95 19,234.50 2,880.00 2,120.05
21 0.64 559.04 19,793.54 2,880.00 2,320.96
22 0.54 471.69 20,265.23 2,880.00 2,408.31
23 0.42 366.87 20,632.10 2,880.00 2,513.13
0 0.38 331.93 20,964.03 2,880.00 2,548.07
24.00 20,964.03
The storage capacity required is the sum of the highest positive storage variation and negative
variation
Total Capacity in liters
Total Capacity in cubic meters
6) Reservoir dimension
Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 3.64 m.

use
Length 3.64 = 3.64 m. 3.70 m.
Breadth 3.64 = 3.64 m. 3.70 m.
Height 3.64 = 3.94 m. 4.00 m.
Freeboard 0.20
Dead vol. Ht. 0.10
Therefore width length height

Use reservoir dimension = 3.70 3.70 4.00
Actual reservoir capacity = 50.65 cu.m.
Note: Computed dimension is INSIDE DIMENSION. 2.50 if + answer the size is OK
ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Simple Ratio Method
Calculate the ratio (R) of the average source flow (ASF) (for spring sources) over the
Average Day Demand and refer to the table below:
R = ASF ÷ ADD TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS
Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

< 1.0 inadequate source
1.0-2.0 ½ of the average daily used
2.0-3.0 ¼ of the average daily used
3.29708

3.0-4.0 of the average daily used

1/8
> 4.0 no storage facility required 3.29708
Note: The source above in the sample is inadequate and to balance the demand and supply-the minimum
required hours to fill a balancing reservoir is 17.59 hours
2.5
1.5
Ratio to ADD
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time (Hours)
TYPICAL WATER DEMAND VARIATION

, fire hydrant reserve, settling or point of
the distribution areas.
Data Unit
58 HH
5 No.
290 No.
0.01 %
15 Years
349 No.
60 Liter
20,964 Liter
0.243 LPS

Existing Reservoir
if + answer the size is OK

TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS
Minimum Time to Fill

Balancing Reservoir
(in hours)
8.44
emand and supply-the minimum
DEFICIT(__)
SURPLUS REMARKS
75,802.50
75,582.28
75,359.31
75,133.55
74,904.97
74,673.53
74,439.20
74,201.94
73,961.72
73,718.49
73,472.22
73,222.87
72,970.41
72,714.79
72,455.97
water consumption per capita

e size of tank since beyond 12 hours filling already
OM WATER DEMAND VARIATION:
SUPPLY MINUS STORAGE

DRAFT (liters) VARIATION (liters)
2,880.00 2,880.00
2,548.07 5,428.07
2,539.33 7,967.40
2,591.74 10,559.15

2,460.72 13,019.87
2,050.17 15,070.04
1,194.14 16,264.18
1,080.59 17,344.77
1,150.47 18,495.24
1,499.87 19,995.11
1,229.08 21,224.19
1,753.18 22,977.37
1,805.59 24,782.97
2,050.17 26,833.14
2,015.23 28,848.38
2,041.44 30,889.81
1,945.35 32,835.17
1,718.24 34,553.41
1,692.04 36,245.45
2,120.05 38,365.50
2,320.96 40,686.46
2,408.31 43,094.77
2,513.13 45,607.90
2,548.07 48,155.97
48,155.97
48,155.97
48.16
if + answer the size is OK
TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS
Minimum Time to Fill

Balancing Reservoir
(in hours)
17.59

17.59
emand and supply-the minimum
TIME
Column B
Column C
ADD RATIO
7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ION

Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis Planning and Design WS
ANNEX 1
II -PIPELINE DESIGN ANALYSIS :
Design criteria
The pipeline must be designed to handle the maximum hour demand or Peak Flow (PF)=2.5ADD of the area to be served
Minimun pressure at the remotest end of the system should be 3.0 meters (Approx. 4.26 psi) and 7.0 meters at the
mainline
Maximum Velocity of flow in the pipes:
a. Main pipes… 3.0 meters per second
b. Distribution pipes… 1.5 meters per second
Water flow per tapstand ranges from 0.125 lps to 0.225 lps
Additional: Consider most economical pipe size and layout
Additonal: Best location of tank ( if any)
A. Pipeline Design Input/Output

Pipeline Section Household Peak Node Pipe Pipe Headloss Actual
Section Node Length Served Flow Elev. Diameter Diameter per Headloss
from to Difference Option 100 m.
(m) (no.) (lps) (m) (mm) (mm) (m) (m)
a b c d e f g h i j k
a R S 100 reservoir 0.60 25 18.8438 38 2 2
100
B. Pipeline Analysis
Branch Node Remarks Residual Remarks
No. of Household Total Headloss Compare Elev Head Accept Head (Hr)
R-S 2 < 25 ok 23.00 ok
Note:
The total headloss is less than the elevation head and therefore accept pipe size.
Column Description:
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 11of 4

Column Description
a Pipe section under consideration
b-c Node section under consideration
d Length of pipe section under consideration (meter)
e Number of household served
f Computed Peak Flow (liter per second)
g Difference in elevation between nodes under consideration (meter)
h Computed Pipe Diameter (mm), using the Darcy Weisbach Formula
i Nominal Diameter available in the market (mm)
j Headloss per 100 meters (refer to table 9.1 or 9.2)
k Actual Headloss

Formula:
Column f:
PF = 2.5 x GRF x N x Average Household Size x PCWC / 86,400
Where:
PF = Peak flow.
GRF = Growth rate factor (1+GR)^life span
N = Total number of household served by the pipe section.
PCWC = Per capita water consumption.
Column h:
HF = (8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/D^5(g)(pi)^2
D^5 =(8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/HF(g)(pi)^2
Where:
HF = Headloss or the difference in elevation between the pipe in

consideration.
F = Coefficient of friction (approximately 0.02).
L = Length of pipe section in consideration.
Q = Water discharge.
D =Pipe diameter (mm).
g =gravitational value (9.81)
pi =3.1415
Simplifying:
D^5 = (0.00165(L)(Q/1000)^2/HF)(1000)(mm)
= (0.00165(Column d)(Column f/1000)^2/(Column g))(1000)
Column j:

From table 9.1 or 9.2, (interpolate when necessary).
Column k:
Actual Headloss = (Headloss per 100 M)(Section Length)/100 (m)

= (Column j)(Column d)/100

ANNEX 1
II -PIPELINE DESIGN ANALYSIS FOR SITIO BAZAR PROPER:
Design criteria
The pipeline must be designed to handle the maximum hour demand or Peak Flow (PF)=2.5ADD of the area to be served
Minimun pressure at the remotest end of the system should be 3.0 meters (Approx. 4.26 psi) and 7.0 meters at the
mainline
Maximum Velocity of flow in the pipes:
a. Main pipes… 3.0 meters per second
b. Distribution pipes… 1.5 meters per second
Water flow per tapstand ranges from 0.125 lps to 0.225 lps
Additional: Consider most economical pipe size and layout
Additonal: Best location of tank ( if any)
A. Pipeline Design Input/Output

Pipeline Section Household Peak Node Pipe Pipe Headloss Actual
Section Node Length Served Flow Elev. Diameter Diameter per Headloss
from to Difference Option 100 m.
(m) (no.) (lps) (m) (mm) (mm) (m) (m)
a b c d e f g h i j k
a R S 1500 reservoir 0.80 33 34.3754 50 0.84 12.6
1500
B. Pipeline Analysis
Branch Node Remarks Residual Remarks
No. of Household Total Headloss Compare Elev Head Accept Head (Hr)
R-S 12.6 < 33 ok 20.40 ok
Note:
The total headloss is less than the elevation head and therefore accept pipe size.
Column Description:

Column Description
a Pipe section under consideration
b-c Node section under consideration
d Length of pipe section under consideration (meter)
e Number of household served
f Computed Peak Flow (liter per second)
g Difference in elevation between nodes under consideration (meter)
h Computed Pipe Diameter (mm), using the Darcy Weisbach Formula
i Nominal Diameter available in the market (mm)
j Headloss per 100 meters (refer to table 9.1 or 9.2)
k Actual Headloss

Formula:
Column f:
PF = 2.5 x GRF x N x Average Household Size x PCWC / 86,400
Where:
PF = Peak flow.
GRF = Growth rate factor (1+GR)^life span
N = Total number of household served by the pipe section.
PCWC = Per capita water consumption.
Column h:
HF = (8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/D^5(g)(pi)^2
D^5 =(8)(f)(L)(Q)^2/HF(g)(pi)^2
Where:
HF = Headloss or the difference in elevation between the pipe in

consideration.
F = Coefficient of friction (approximately 0.02).
L = Length of pipe section in consideration.
Q = Water discharge.
D =Pipe diameter (mm).
g =gravitational value (9.81)
pi =3.1415
Simplifying:
D^5 = (0.00165(L)(Q/1000)^2/HF)(1000)(mm)
= (0.00165(Column d)(Column f/1000)^2/(Column g))(1000)
Column j:

From table 9.1 or 9.2, (interpolate when necessary).
Column k:
Actual Headloss = (Headloss per 100 M)(Section Length)/100 (m)

= (Column j)(Column d)/100

Schematic Diagram/Project Area Map Planning and Design WS
ANNEX 1
Schematic Diagram of
Subproject Name Prepared Drawing Title Sub-Project No.
Sheet Title
Location Checked
Scale Sheet No.
NTS
KALAHI-CIDSS
Fricstion Headloss Table Planning and Design WS
6
Q PIPE SIZE (mm)
LPS 13 19 25 31 38 50 63
0.01 0.1
0.02 0.4
0.03 0.8 0.11
0.04 1.4 0.19
0.05 2.1 0.3
0.06 3 0.41 0.1
0.07 4 0.5 0.13
0.08 5 0.65 0.17
0.09 6.3 0.82 0.22
0.10 7.6 1.06 0.26
0.11 9.1 1.18 0.31 0.11
0.12 10.7 1.5 0.36 0.13
0.14 2 0.48 0.17
0.15 2.1 0.55 0.18
0.16 2.5 0.62 0.22
0.18 3.1 0.77 0.27 0.101
0.20 3.8 0.94 0.32 0.131
0.25 5.8 1.42 0.48 0.2
0.30 2 0.67 0.23
0.40 3.4 1.15 0.47 0.12
0.50 5.1 1.74 0.71 0.18
0.60 7.2 2.4 1 0.25
0.70 3.2 1.33 0.33 0.11
0.80 4.1 1.7 0.42 0.14
1.00 6.3 2.6 0.64 0.21
1.20 8.8 3.6 0.89 0.3
1.40 4.4 1.2 0.4
1.50 4.9 1.35 0.44
1.60 5.5 1.52 0.51
1.80 7.35 1.88 0.64
2.00 8.4 2.3 0.77
2.50 3.5 1.2
3.00 4.95 1.65
3.50 6.95 2.19
4.00 9.2 3
4.50 11.85 3.6
5.00 4.5
6.00 6.2
7.00 8.6
8.00
10.00
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN METERS PER 100 METERS

PLASTIC PIPE - PVC, PE, PB
TABLE 9.1
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN PLASTIC PIPES
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reference for Annex 1-----20of 3

Q PIPE SIZE (mm)

LPS 13 19 25 31 38 50 63
0.01 0.2
0.02 0.8
0.03 1.6 0.22
0.04 2.8 0.38
0.05 4.2 0.6
0.06 6 0.82 0.2
0.07 8 1 0.26
0.08 10 1.3 0.34
0.09 12.6 1.64 0.44 0.15
0.10 15.2 2.12 0.52 0.18
0.11 18.2 2.36 0.62 0.22
0.12 21.4 3 0.72 0.26
0.14 4 0.96 0.34 0.13
0.15 4.2 1.1 0.36 0.15
0.16 5 1.24 0.44 0.16
0.18 6.2 1.54 0.54 0.202
0.20 7.6 1.88 0.64 0.262 0.7
0.25 11.6 2.84 0.96 0.4 0.1
0.30 4 1.34 0.46 0.14
0.40 6.8 2.3 0.94 0.24
0.50 10.2 3.48 1.42 0.36 0.12
0.60 14.4 4.8 2 0.5 0.17
0.70 6.4 2.66 0.66 0.22
0.80 8.2 3.4 0.84 0.28
1.00 12.6 5.2 1.28 0.42
1.20 17.6 7.2 1.78 0.6
1.40 8.8 2.4 0.8
1.50 9.8 2.7 0.88
1.60 11 3.04 1.02
1.80 14.7 3.76 1.28
2.00 16.8 4.6 1.54
2.50 7 2.4
3.00 9.9 3.3
3.50 13.9 4.38
4.00 18.4 6
4.50 23.7 7.2
5.00 9
6.00 12.4
7.00 17.2
8.00
10.00
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN METERS PER 100 METERS

GALVANIZED IRON PIPE (GIP)
TABLE 9.2
FRICTION HEAD LOSS IN GI PIPES

RESISTANCE OF VALVE AND FITTINGS*
13 0.55 0.24 1.04 0.11 4.88 2.56 4.88

19 0.69 0.3 1.37 0.14 6.4 3.66 6.4
25 0.84 0.41 `1.77 0.18 8.23 4.57
32 1.14 0.52 2.29 0.24 11.28 5.49
38 1.36 0.61 2.74 0.29 13.71 6.71
50 1.62 0.76 3.66 0.38 16.76 8.54
63 1.98 0.91 4.27 0.43 19.61 10.06
75 2.5 1.16 4.88 0.53 25.9 12.8
100 3.35 1.52 6.71 0.7 33.54 12.8
150 5.03 2.04 9.76 1.01 48.78 24.39
EQUIVQLENT LENGTH STRAIGHT PIPE METERS
*WHEN THE LENGTH OF PIPE IS GREATER THAN 1000 TIMES ITS DIAMETER, THE LOSS OF HEAD DUE TO VALVE
AND FITTINGS MAYBE DISREGARDED.
EQUIVALENT LENGTH OF PIPE FITTINGS, VALVES, ETC.

(mm)
75 100 150
INTERPOLATION
Discharge Friction Headloss per 100 meters

Upper 0.14 2
Middle 0.145 x -2.025
Lower 0.16 2.1
0.089
0.124
0.165
0.187
0.211
0.262
0.32 0.079
0.48 0.119
0.68 0.166
0.9 0.221
1.15 0.284
1.43 0.353
1.74 0.429 0.06
2.44 0.6 0.09
3.2 0.8 0.11
4.15 1.2 0.14
6.5 1.55 0.21

(mm)
75 100 150
INTERPOLATION
Discharge Friction Headloss per 100 meters

Upper 0.3 1.34
Middle 0.26 31 x -1.036
Lower 0.25 0.96
Headloss per 100 m
0.7
0.91
0.117
0.177
0.248
0.33
0.374
0.422 0.104
0.524 0.129
0.64 0.157
0.96 0.238
1.36 0.332
1.8 0.442
2.3 0.368
2.86 0.706
3.48 0.858 0.12
4.88 1.2 0.17
6.4 1.6 0.22
8.3 2.4 0.28
13 3.1 0.42

1.22 3.05 1.16

1.52 3.66 1.58
1.83 4.27 1.98
2.13 4.88 2.74
2.44 5.49 3.35
2.74 6.1 4.27
3.05 6.71 5.18
3.66 7.62 5.79
4.57 9.15 7.62
6.42 12.21 11.59
E METERS
AMETER, THE LOSS OF HEAD DUE TO VALVES AND

unknown




Republic of the Philippines
Department of Environmenta
Cordillera Adminis
NAME OF PROJECT:
PROJECT LOCATION:
OWNER:
SUBJECT:
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT

(1) (2) (3) (4)
I GENERAL REQUIREMENT
I.a Mobilization, demobilization and Temfacil 1 lot
II CLEARING AND GRUBBING
II.1. Sewerage System/ Main sewer Lines and STP 777 sq. m
II.1.a) Labor Cost
III SEWERAGE SYSTEM
III.a Sewerage Trench Excavation (Common Earth Excavation) 777 sq. m
III.1.a:) Labor Cost
III.1.a) Excavation (Common Earth Excavation)
III.1.b) PCCP Demolition
III.1.c.1) Equipment Rental (Back hoe)
III.1.c.2) Equipment Rental (Compressor w/ Jack Hammer)
III.2. Laying-out of Pipes
III.2.a) Structural Backfill Material Preparation (Trench backfill)
III.2.b) Pipe Laying and Installation of Pipe Fittings and Accessories
III.2.b.1) Labor:
III.3. ManHole Assembly
III.4. Materials Cost
IV STP ENCLOSURE/PERIMETER PROTECTION
IV.1 Clearing and Grubbing
V ELECTRO-MECHANICALS
TOTAL
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Cordillera Administrative Region
Gibraltar Rd., Baguio City 2600
CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSE DENR SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

DENR COMPOUND, GIBRALTAR ROAD, BAGUIO CITY 2600
DENR-CAR
APPROVED BUDGET FOR THE CONTRACT
MARK-UPS IN PERCENT TOTAL MARK-UP

ESTIMATED DIRECT COST VAT
OCM PROFIT % VALUE
(5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
% % % (5) X (8) 12%[(5)+(9)]
₱90,000.00 15% 10% 25% ₱22,500.00 ₱13,500.00
₱10,261.10 15% 10% 25% ₱2,565.28 ₱1,539.17
₱986,313.33 15% 10% 25% ₱246,578.33 ₱147,947.00

-1
TOTAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST

(11) (12) (13)
(9) + (10) (5) + (11) (12)/(3)
₱36,000.00 ₱126,000.00 ₱126,000.00
₱4,104.44 ₱14,365.54 ₱18.49
₱394,525.33 ₱1,380,838.66 ₱1,777.14

SUB-PROJECT PROGRAM OF WORKS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

Sub-Project Title: Date Prepared:
(STP)
Location: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUREAU (EMB) January 06,202
Category: Public Goods
Physical Target: 1st Revision:
Total Sub-Project Cost: Err:509 Php 2nd Revision:

Mode of Implementation: 3rd Revision:
Project Description: Sub-Project Duration: 30 CD
Equipment Needed:
Technical Personnel:
I. SCOPE OF WORK
%
Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Tot
Wt.
I Clearing and Grubbing Err:509 777.00 sq.m 18.49 14
II
EXCAVATION: Err:509 932.40 Cu.m Err:509 Err:5
III Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 ln.m Err:509 Err:5
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:5
Project Supervisor (Foreman) Err:509 30.00 md 468.00 14
Total Err:509 Err:
II. COST SHARING ARRANGEMENT
Local Counterpart Contributions
DENR
Particular Tot
Cash In-kind
MLGU BLGU MLGU BLGU
A. DIRECT COST
Material Cost
a. Pick-up Cost 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
b. Freight Cost 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
Construction Supervisor 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
Labor
a. Skilled 60.00% 10.00% 30.00% 100.0
b. Unskilled 60.00% 10.00% 30.00% 100.0
B. INDIRECT COST
Project Engineer 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
Steel Cabinet 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
Bond Premium 100.00% 100.0
Handtools and PPE*** 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
Administrative Cost 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
Subsidy to Volunteers 100.00% 100.0
Contingency 85.00% 15.00% 100.0
III. COST BREAKDOWN
A. Breakdown of Estimated Local Gov't.Units
Community Tot
Sub- Project Direct Cost Cash In-kind
(In-kind)
MLGU BLGU MLGU BLGU
Material Cost
a. Pick-up Cost Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:5
b. Freight Cost Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:5
Construction Supervisro 11,934.00 - - 2,106.00 - - 14
Labor
a. Skilled Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:5
b. Unskilled Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:5
Sub-Total A Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:
B. Breakdown of Estimated Local Gov't.Units
Community Total
Sub- Project Indirect Cost Cash In-kind
(In-kind)
MLGU BLGU MLGU BLGU
Project Engineer Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:5
4-Drawers, 45cm x 65cm x
7,225.00 - 1,275.00 - - - 8
130cm Steel Cabinet
Bond Premium - - - 3,375.00 - - 3
Handtools and PPE***
a. 15 pcs Rubber Boots 4,462.50 - 787.50 - - - 5
b. 15 pcs Hard Hats** 2,550.00 - 450.00 - - - 3
c. 15 pcs Round
Hand Gloves
Tip 637.50 - 112.50 - - -
e. 2 pcs Shovel 595.00 - 105.00 - - -
(Tempered)
25mm Digging
f. 2 pcs 850.00 - 150.00 - - - 1
Bar
Administrative Cost 24,455.54 Err:509 4,315.68 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 28
Subsidy to Volunteers - - - 30,000.0 - - 30
Contingency Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:5
Sub-Total B Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Total Estimated Sub- Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:
project Cost
Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509
% Cost Sharing Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:
Err:509
***PPE =Personal Protective Equipment
** Hard Hat = Safety Helmet; Color: 1 white and 19 yellow
*Dust Mask = 50 pcs per box; garterized anchor (Surgical mask);Dimension = 17.5cm x9cm
Prepared by: Checked and Reviewed by: Approved by:
Concurred by: Noted by:

ary 06,2020
Total
14,365.54
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
14,040.00
Err:509
Total
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
Total
Err:509
Err:509
14,040.00
-
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
Total Cost
Err:509
8,500.00
3,375.00
5,250.00
3,000.00
750.00
700.00
1,000.00
28,771.22
30,000.00
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
BILL OF MATERIALS
Unit Costs
ITEMMaterial
NO. Description quantity Unit Pickup
Labor: - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
Materials - 0 -
0 - 0 -
311
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 Subtotal 3= 0 -
0 - 0 -
D. Conrete Works - 0 -
Quantity = cu.m - 0 -
0 Subtotal 2= 0 -
0 - 0 -
C. Formworks - 0 -
Quantity = sq.m - 0 -
0 - 0 -
Labor: - 0 -
500-a
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
Materials - 0 -
0 - 0 -
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
505
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
SPL
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Unit Costs
Type
Material Description quantity Unit Pickup
Labor: #VALUE! 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
Quantity = cu.m - 0 -
Hardware
Materials - 0 -
0 - 0 -
Hardware
0 - 0 -
0 - 0 -
0 Subtotal 3= 0 -
0 - 0 -
D. Conrete Works - 0 -
### Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
0 Err:509 0 -
0 Err:509 0 -
Aggregates
### Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
30- 2 x 6 x 8 Good Lumber (FOB to SP Site) 240.00 0 -

Lumber 28- 2 x 2 x 8 Good Lumber (FOB to SP Site) 74.67 0 -
Project Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Billboard
Unit Costs Total Cost Costs
Freight Manual Hauling Pickup Freight Manual Hauling
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
From Summary of Estimate #REF! #REF! #REF!
Unit Costs Total Cost Costs

Freight Manual Hauling Pickup Freight Manual Hauling
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
Sub-Total #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
- - Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
- - Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Sub-Total Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
Sub-Total - - -
Sub-Total Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

#VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
BARANGAY SUB-PR
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE

Name of Sub-project:
TREATMENT PLANT (STP)
Total Sub-project Cost:
Physical Target:
Region: Cordillera Adminstrative Region

Location
Province: Benguet Target Starting Date:

Municipality: Baguio City
Barangay: Revised Completion Date:
ITEM WEIGHT DURATION
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT AMOUNT
No. (%) (WD)
Procurement Activities
3.11
I Clearing and Grubbing 777.00 sq.m 14,365.54 Err:509
Err:509
II EXCAVATION: 932.40 cu.m Err:509 Err:509
Err:509
III Err:509 Err:509 ln.m Err:509 Err:509
Err:509
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 cu.m Err:509 Err:509
30.00
Project Supervisor (Foreman) 30.00 md 14,040.00 Err:509
TOTAL Err:509 Err:509
% PROGRESS PERIODIC
(PLANNED) CUMULATIVE
PHYSICAL PROGRESS
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (ACTUAL)
CUMULATIVE
SLIPPAGE
Prepared by: Checked and reviewed by:
0 0
ACT Deputy Area Coordinator MCT Deputy Area Coordinator
Note: Attach Material Records Sheet if physical accomplishment lags behind financial disbursements.
BARANGAY SUB-PROJECT TARGET WORK SCHEDULE
L
Total Sub-project Cost: Err:509 Php Mode of Implementation
Direct Cost: Err:509 Php Category
Indirect Cost: Err:509 Php Skilled

Target Starting Date: Community Force Account
Target Duration: 30 CD Unskilled
Revised Completion Date:
Physical DURATION
Target January 2012 February 2012 March 2013 April 2013
Planned 1st Tranche Mat'ls delivery
Actual
Planned Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Actual
Planned Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Actual
Planned Err:509 Err:509
Actual
Planned Err:509
Actual
Planned Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Actual
Planned Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Actual 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
C Err:509 Err:509 0.00% 0.00%

VE Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
C 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
VE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
NOTE: 1. WORK SCHEDULE STARTS AFTER THE 1ST TRANCHE PROCUREMENT
2. 6 WORKING DAYS PER WEEK
Approved by: Noted by:
0 DOMINADOR O. MATBAGAN
Coordinator BSPMC Chairperson Reg'l Community Infrastructure Spe
Labor Generated
Category Total No of Days Ave rate/Day
Male
Female
Unskilled Male
Female
April 2013 May 2013
Err:509
0.00%
Err:509
0.00%
Err:509
0.00%
Err:509
0.00%
Err:509
0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
Err:509 Err:509
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
Err:509 Err:509
MINADOR O. MATBAGAN
mmunity Infrastructure Specialist
KALAHI-CIDSS PRO
PLANNED COMMUNITY PROCUR
Sub-project Title:
Location:
(Barangay) Municipality
Total Estimated Sub-Project Cost (Php)
Implementation Duration (CD) Calendar Days
1ST Tranche (Php) 255,665.04 53.29%
Planned KC Grant 2ND Tranche (Php) 87,675.63 18.27%
Release Per
Tranche 3RD Tranche (Php) 136,439.28 28.44%
Total KC Grant (Php) 479,779.95 100.00%
I. FIRST TRANCHE
ESTIMATED
Package
Procure
Method
ment
No
Package Items
Qty Unit Unit Cost
A. DIRECT COST
A.1 Hardware Materials
4" Common Wire Nails 20.00 kgs 70.00
Local Bidding for Goods

Package No. 01

Estimated Budget for the Package
A.2 Aggregates
Package No. 02
19mm Coarse Aggegates 20.00 cu.m 1,000.00

Shopping for
4.75mm Fine Aggregate 20.00 cu.m 1,000.00

Local
Goods
Boulders 20.00 cu.m 800.00

A.3 Lumbers - FOB to Project Site (Delivered to project site)
Package No. 03
25 - 2 x 3 x 16 Good Lumber 200.00 bdft 24.00

Shopping for

Goods
Local
Package No. 03
Shopping for
Goods
Local Estimated Budget for the Package
A.4 Labor
Package No. 04
Construction Foreman 65.00 mdays 468.00

Force Account
Community
Skilled Labor 120.00 mdays 338.00

Unskilled Labor 200.00 mdays 260.00
A.5 Freight Cost for Hardware Materials
4" Common Wire Nails 20.00 kgs
Local Shopping for Goods

Package No. 05

A.6 Manual Hauling Cost for Construction Materials
Community Force Account

Package No. 06

19mm Coarse Aggegates 20.00 cu.m
4.75mm Fine Aggregate 20.00 cu.m
Boulders 20.00 cu.m
A.7 Project Billboard
Local Shopping for
Package No. 07
2.4m x 1.2m Billboard, #16 Flat Sheet, L38x38x6mm Framing,

50mmØ x S20 GI Pipe Stand and 6-12mmx75mm Bolts with Nuts 1 lot 70.00
Goods
and Washers (FOB to SP Site)

Package No.
Local Shoppin
Goods
Total First Tranche Direct Cost

B. INDIRECT COST
08 LSS Project Engineer 0.80 lot 45,000.00
09 LSG 4-Drawers, 47cm x 61.5cm Steel Cabinet 1.00 set 8,500.00
10 NTP Bond Premium 1.00 lot 3,375.00
Handtools and Personal Protective Equipment
Rubber Boots 20.00 pcs 350.00
Hard Hats (1 white and 19 yellow) 20.00 pcs 200.00
Hand Gloves 40.00 pcs 50.00
11 LSG Surgical/Dust Mask (50 pcs/box, gaterized anchor) 2.00 box 250.00
Round Tip Shovel (Tempered) 6.00 pcs 350.00
25mm Digging Bar 4.00 pcs 250.00
Sub-total
12 NTP Administrative Cost 0.80 lot 33,378.00
Total First Tranche Indirect Cost
Total First Tranche (Direct Cost + Indirect Cost)
II. SECOND TRANCHE

ESTIMATED COST I
Package
Procure
Method
ment
No
Package Items
Qty Unit Unit Cost
A. DIRECT COST
A.3 Lumbers
Package No. 16

Shopping for

Goods
Local

A.4 Labor
Package No. 17

Force Account
Community

18

Package No. 18

Community Force Account

Package No. 19

Boulders 20.00 cu.m
Total Second Tranche Direct Cost

B. INDIRECT COST
Total Second Tranche Indirect Cost
Total Second Tranche (Direct Cost + Indirect Cost)
III. THIRD TRANCHE

ESTIMATED COST I
Package
Procure
Method
ment
No
Package Items
Qty Unit Unit Cost
A. DIRECT COST
A.1 Hardware Materials
r Goods
o. 22
Local Bidding for Goods

Package No. 22

A.2 Aggregates
Package No. 23
19mm Coarse Aggegates 10.00 cu.m 1,000.00

Shopping for
4.75mm Fine Aggregate 10.00 cu.m 1,000.00

Local
Goods
Boulders 5.00 cu.m 800.00

A.3 Lumbers
Package No. 24

Shopping for

Goods
Local

A.4 Labor
Package No. 25

Force Account
Community


Package No. 26

ccount
27
Community Force Account 4" Common Wire Nails 20.00 kgs
Package No. 27

Boulders 20.00 cu.m
Total Third Tranche Direct Cost

B. INDIRECT COST
30 Subsidy to Volunteers 1.00 lot 15,000.00
31 NTP Contingency 1.00 lot 42,369.00
Total Third Tranche Indirect Cost
Total Third Tranche (Direct Cost + Indirect Cost)
** Hard Hat = Safety Helmet; TOTAL DIRECT COST

Color: 1 white and 19 yellow;
*Dust Mask = Surgical Mask; TOTAL INDIRECT COST
50 pcs per box; garterized
anchore; Dimension = 17.5cm TOTAL ESTIMATED SUB-PROJECT COST
x 9cm
Workshop Output of: Checked and Reviewed by:
Head, Procurement Team ACT-DAC MCT-DAC
Head, Project Implementation Team ACT-MFA

ALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT
UNITY PROCUREMENT PACKAGING
Municipality Province
COST SHARING BREAKDOWN Amount
Mode/s of Implementation
KALAHI-CIDSS GRANT: Php 479,779.95
LCC Cost Cash:Php 88,042.05
1. Community Force Account 88,042.05
In-kind: Php -
Total Estimated Cost: Php 567,822.00
2.
Date Prepared: December 12, 2012
ESTIMATED COST INVOLVED Implementation / Delivery Schedule

Quantities to be delivered on the target
Cash Component In-kind LCC
Total Cost Implementation/Delivery
KC Grant LCC Cash Amount Nov.'12 Dec'12 Jan'13 Feb'13
85% 15%
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
16,660.00 2,940.00 -
19,600.00
19,600.00
85% 15%
17,000.00 3,000.00 20,000.00 20.00
17,000.00 3,000.00 20,000.00 20.00
13,600.00 2,400.00 16,000.00 20.00
47,600.00 8,400.00 -
56,000.00
56,000.00
85% 15%
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00 200.00
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00 200.00
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00 200.00
12,240.00 2,160.00 -
14,400.00
14,400.00
85% 15%
25,857.00 4,563.00 30,420.00 65.00
34,476.00 6,084.00 40,560.00 120.00
44,200.00 7,800.00 52,000.00 200.00
104,533.00 18,447.00 -
122,980.00
122,980.00
85% 15%
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - -
-
-
85% 15%
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - -
-
-
85% 15%
59.50 10.50 70.00 1.00

59.50 10.50 -
70.00
70.00
181,033.00 31,947.00 -
212,980.00
212,980.00
85% 15%
30,600.00 5,400.00 36,000.00 0.80
7,225.00 1,275.00 8,500.00 1.00
3,375.00 3,375.00 1.00
- -
5,950.00 1,050.00 7,000.00 20.00
3,400.00 600.00 4,000.00 20.00
1,700.00 300.00 2,000.00 40.00
425.00 75.00 500.00 2.00
1,785.00 315.00 2,100.00 6.00
850.00 150.00 1,000.00 4.00
14,110.00 2,490.00 -
16,600.00
16,600.00
22,697.04 4,005.36 26,702.40 0.80
74,632.04 16,545.36 -
91,177.40
91,177.40
255,665.04 48,492.36 -
304,157.40
304,157.40

Cash Component In-kind LCC Total Cost
Implementation/Delivery
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00

1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00 20.00
20,400.00 3,600.00 -
24,000.00
24,000.00
85% 15%
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00 200.00
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00 200.00
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00 200.00
12,240.00 2,160.00 -
14,400.00
14,400.00
85% 15%
7,956.00 1,404.00 9,360.00 20.00 20.00
7,182.50 1,267.50 8,450.00 25.00 25.00
16,575.00 2,925.00 19,500.00 75.00 75.00
31,713.50 5,596.50 -
37,310.00
37,310.00
85% 15%
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - -
-
-
85% 15%
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - -
-
-
81,013.50 14,296.50 -
95,310.00
95,310.00
85% 15%
3,825.00 675.00 4,500.00 0.10
2,837.13 500.67 3,337.80 0.10
6,662.13 1,175.67 -
7,837.80
7,837.80
87,675.63 15,472.17 -
103,147.80
103,147.80

Cash Component In-kind LCC Total Cost
Implementation/Delivery
85% 15%
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
1,190.00 210.00 1,400.00
16,660.00 2,940.00 -
19,600.00
19,600.00
85% 15%
8,500.00 1,500.00 10,000.00
8,500.00 1,500.00 10,000.00
3,400.00 600.00 4,000.00
20,400.00 3,600.00 -
24,000.00
24,000.00
85% 15%
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00
4,080.00 720.00 4,800.00
12,240.00 2,160.00 -
14,400.00
14,400.00
85% 15%
7,956.00 1,404.00 9,360.00
7,182.50 1,267.50 8,450.00
16,575.00 2,925.00 19,500.00
31,713.50 5,596.50 -
37,310.00
37,310.00
85% 15%
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - -
-
-
85% 15%
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - - 20.00
- - -
-
-
81,013.50 14,296.50 -
95,310.00
95,310.00
85% 15%
3,825.00 675.00 4,500.00
2,837.13 500.67 3,337.80
12,750.00 2,250.00 15,000.00
36,013.65 6,355.35 42,369.00
55,425.78 9,781.02 -
65,206.80
65,206.80
136,439.28 24,077.52 -
160,516.80
160,516.80
Legend:
343,060.00 60,540.00 - NTP = Not To be Procured
403,600.00
403,600.00 LSG = Local Shopping for Goods
136,719.95 27,502.05 - LBG = Local Bidding for Goods
164,222.00
164,222.00 LSW = Local Shopping for Works
479,779.95 88,042.05 - LBW = Local Bidding for Works
567,822.00
567,822.00 LSS = Local Shopping for Services
CFA = Community Force Account
Approved by: Noted by:
MCT-DAC DOMINADOR O. MATBAGAN

Chairperson, BSPMC Regional Community Infrastructure Specialist
%
84.49%
15.51%
100.00%
cember 12, 2012
livery Schedule
red on the target
/Delivery
Mar'13
livery Schedule
red on the target
/Delivery
Mar'13
livery Schedule
red on the target
/Delivery
Mar'13
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
20.00
25.00
75.00
0.10
0.10
1.00
1.00
opping for Goods

dding for Goods
opping for Works
dding for Works
pping for Services
ty Force Account
MATBAGAN
astructure Specialist
OFFICE OF THE BARANGAY SUB-PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
KApit-bisig LAban sa kaHIrapan - Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social Services
KALAHI-CIDSS Project
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUREAU (EMB)
DERIVATION OF HARDWARE MATERIAL FREIGHT COST
Project Title: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLAN

Location: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUREAU (EMB)
I. DETERMINATION OF THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF HARWARE MATERIALS
Hardware Material Description Quntity Unit Weight/Unit

(kgs/unit)
1 Err:509 Err:509 pc 40.000
2 Err:509 Err:509 pc 5.328
4 Err:509 Err:509 pc 3.700
5 Err:509 Err:509 pc 33.300
6 Err:509 Err:509 pc 24.400
Grand Total
II. DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT UNIT COST PER KILOGRAM

Total weight to be hauled = Err:509
a) Time Spotting
Hauling Distance = 47.00 kms
No of trips required
No of cargo truck to be utilized = 1.00 units
Capacity of cargo truck/trip = 4,000.00 kgs
No of trips required = Err:509 say 3.00
Speed (with load) = 15.00 km/hr
Speed (without load) = 20.00 km/hr
Travel time (with load) = 3.13 hrs
Travel time (without load) = 2.35 hrs rate/day
Loading time = 1.00 hrs 6248
Unloading Time = 1.00 hrs
Resting time = 0.50 hrs
TOTAL CYCLE TIME = 7.98 hrs/trip rate/day
NO OF HOURS REQUIRED = 23.94 hrs 260
b) Cost of Freight
b.1) Fully Operated Equipment Rental
No of hours
Equipment Description Quantity Rate/hr
required
3Tonner Cargo Truck 1.00 781 23.94
Equipment Rental Cost
b.2) Labor Cost (Loading and Unloading)

No of hours
Manpower Description Quantity Rate/hr
required
Laborers 2.00 32.5 23.94
TOTAL MATERIAL FRIEGHT COST = P

UNIT MATERIAL FRIEGHT COST = P
Weight/Unit Manual Freight

Hardware Material Description Unit (kgs/unit) Cost per Unit
1 Err:509 pc 40.000 Err:509
2 Err:509 pc 5.328 Err:509
4 Err:509 pc 3.700 Err:509
5 Err:509 pc 33.300 Err:509
6 Err:509 pc 24.400 Err:509
Prepared by:
0
0
Checked by:
0
0
MITTEE
Social Services
COST
WAGE TREATMENT PLANT (STP)
Total Weight (kgs)
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
Err:509
kgs
Total Weight
Capacity/Trip
trips
rate/hr
781
rate/hr
32.5
Amount
18,697.14
18,697.14
Amount
1,556.10
1,556.10
20,253.24
Err:509 /kg
KApit-bisig LAban sa kaHIrapan - Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social Services
KALAHI-CIDSS Project
#VALUE!
DERIVATION OF HARDWARE MATERIAL MANUAL HAULING COST

Project Title: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT (ST
Location: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUREAU (EMB)

I. DETERMINATION OF THE TOTAL WEIGHT OF HARWARE MATERIALS
Weight/Unit
Hardware Material Description Quntity Unit (kgs/unit)
1 #REF! #REF! #REF! 40.000
2 #REF! #REF! #REF! 9.450
3 #REF! #REF! #REF! 3.691
4 #REF! #REF! #REF! 2.000
5 #REF! #REF! #REF! 1.000
6 #REF! #REF! #REF! 15.000
7 #REF! #REF! #REF! 20.000
8 #REF! #REF! #REF! 10.000
9 #REF! #REF! #REF! 2.000
10 #REF! #REF! #REF! 5.000
11 #REF! #REF! #REF! 10.000
Grand Total
II. DETERMINATION OF MANUAL HAULING UNIT COST PER KILOGRAM

Total weight to be hauled = #REF!
a) Time Spotting
Hauling Distance = 0.30 kms No of trips
No of laborers to be utilized = 6.00 laborers/day required
Capacity of laborer/trip = 40.00 kgs
No of trips required = #REF! say #REF!
Speed (with load) = 1.50 km/hr
Speed (without load) = 2.00 km/hr
Travel time (with load) = 0.20 hrs
Travel time (without load) = 0.15 hrs
Resting time = 0.50 hrs
TOTAL CYCLE TIME = 0.85 hrs/trip
8 Hrs/Day
NO OF TRIPS PER DAY =
Total Cycle Time
= 9.41 say 10.00
No of Trips required
No of Days Required =
(No of Laborers)(No of Trips/day)
= #REF! say #REF!
b) Cost of Manual Hauling
No of days
Manpower Description Quantity Rate/Day
required
Laborers 6.00 260 #REF!
TOTAL HAULING COST = P

UNIT HAULING COST = P
Weight/Unit Hauling Cost per

Hardware Material Description Unit (kgs/unit) Unit
1 #REF! #REF! 40.000 #REF!
2 #REF! #REF! 9.450 #REF!
3 #REF! #REF! 3.691 #REF!
4 #REF! #REF! 2.000 #REF!
5 #REF! #REF! 1.000 #REF!
6 #REF! #REF! 15.000 #REF!
7 #REF! #REF! 20.000 #REF!
8 #REF! #REF! 10.000 #REF!
9 #REF! #REF! 2.000 #REF!
10 #REF! #REF! 5.000 #REF!
11 #REF! #REF! 10.000 #REF!
Prepared by:
FABIAN S. DUMALNOS
Service Provider
Checked by:
ADOLF F. GANGGANGAN & NESTOR A. ALICOG

ACT - DAC & MCT - DAC
COMMITTEE
ery of Social Services
HAULING COST
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT (STP)
NT BUREAU (EMB)
Total Weight
(kgs)
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
kgs
Total Weight
Capacity/Trip
trips
trips/day
days
Amount
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF! /kg
S. DUMALNOS
ce Provider
GAN & NESTOR A. ALICOG

C & MCT - DAC
BOND PREMIUM TABLE
Minimum Cash Maximum Cash
Amount of Bond Bond Premium
Accountability Accountability
75% of their Total Bond Premium shall not be
5,001.00 9,000.00
Cash Accountability less than Php150.00
9,001.00 12,000.00 9,000.00 150.00
12,001.00 15,000.00 11,250.00 168.75
15,001.00 18,000.00 13,500.00 202.50
18,001.00 21,000.00 16,750.00 251.25
21,001.00 25,000.00 18,900.00 283.50
25,001.00 30,000.00 22,500.00 337.50
30,001.00 35,000.00 26,250.00 393.75
35,001.00 40,000.00 30,000.00 450.00
40,001.00 50,000.00 37,500.00 562.50
50,001.00 60,000.00 45,000.00 675.00
60,001.00 80,000.00 60,000.00 900.00
80,001.00 100,000.00 75,000.00 1,125.00
100,001.00 250,000.00 100,000.00 1,500.00
250,001.00 500,000.00 225,000.00 3,375.00
500,001.00 750,000.00 350,250.00 5,253.75
750,001.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 7,500.00
1,000,001.00 2,500,000.00 750,000.00 11,250.00
2,500,001.00 5,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 22,500.00
5,000,001.00 25,000,000.00 3,500,000.00 52,500.00
25,000,001.00 75,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 60,000.00
75,000,001.00 100,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 75,000.00
DETERMINATION OF CASH ACCOUNTABILTIY
INDIRECT COSTS
Particular Less than PhP 500,000.00Php 500,000.00 to 1.0 million Php1.0 M - 3.0 M and up
Pre-engineering 3% of the Direct Cost but
not to exceed 20,000.00 3% of the Direct Cost but not 3% of the Direct Cost but
or the actual cost to exceed 30,000.00 or the not to exceed 70,000.00 or
incurred by the actual cost incurred by the the actual cost incurred by
proponent proponent the proponent
Contingency 6 - 8% of the Direct Cost 5% of the Direct Cost 5% of the Direct Cost but
not to exceed 200,000.00
Hand Tools 2% of the Direct Cost but Not to excced 10,000.00 Not to excced 10,000.00
not to excced 5,000.00
Administrative Cost Estimated cost to be incurred during procurement activities and cost of forms
reproduction. It should be based on the prevailing transportation cost of the area
Overhead Cost Estimated costfor the salaries of Project Foreman and Engineer for the whole duration
of sub-project implementation that are needed
Environmental Not to excced 5,000.00 Not to excced 5,000.00 Not to excced 5,000.00
Mitigating Cost
Supervision Cost 3% of the Direct Cost but 3% of the Direct Cost but not 3% of the Direct Cost but
not to exceed 15,000.00 to exceed 25,000.00 not to exceed 50,000.00
Detailed Estimates
ANNEX 1a
FORMAT OF DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
The presentation of the materials, labor and equipment in details is helpful when implementing the subproject by c
account.
ITEM RESERVOIR ( 8 cu.m. )
A. MATERIALS
1) Computation of Quantities and Costing
Particular Compu Material Quantity
Description Specs. Factor ted Compu- Say Unit
Volume ted
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) 3.26 cu.m
Plaster (1:2) 0.3 cu.m
Portland cement 40 kg. 38 bag
Sand 0.5 2.13 cu.m
Gravel 1 3.3 cu.m
Sahara compound D.C. 35 pack
RSB 10 mm x 6 m D.C. 41 pc.
12 mm x 6 m D.C. 23 pc.
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 D.C. 3 kg.
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' D.C. 18 sheet
Rough lumber 2" x 2" x 8' D.C. 50 pc.
Common nails #4 D.C. 25 kg.
# 1-1/2 D.C. 3 kg.
TOTAL
B. LABOUR COST
Productivity rate ( Excavation ) 1.6 cu.m./m-day
Productivity rate ( Concrete works ) 0.14 cu.m./m-day
Particular Quantity Gang Activity Duration Rate
Description Manpower Required Output Compu- Say per Day
ted
Excavation 3.76
Supervisor 1 12.8 0.29375 1 250.00
Laborer 8 1 150.00
Form works
Supervisor 1 6 250.00
Carpenter 2 6 225.00
Laborer 8 6 150.00
Steel works
Steelperson 2 3 225.00
Laborer 8 3 150.00
Concrete works 3.26
Supervisor 1 1.4 2.328571429 3 250.00
Mason 2 3 225.00
Laborer 8 3 150.00
TOTAL 13
C. SUMMARY OF ITEM COST

Work No. of No. of Funding TOTAL
Particular Duration Manpower MD Inkind CASH
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT 75 of 7
Detailed Estimates
(P)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 22,802.50 22,802.50
LABOUR
Skilled 3 - 8,650.00 8,650.00
Unskilled 8 - 15,600.00 15,600.00
TOTAL 13 11 - 47,052.50 47,052.50
Note: cost not current
Detailed Estimates
ITEM SPRING BOX ( Improvement )
A. MATERIALS
Volume ted
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) 0.224
Portland cement 40 kg. 9 2.016 2.5 bag
Sand 0.5 0.112 0.15 cu.m
Gravel 1 0.224 0.25 cu.m
Sahara compund D.C. 2 pack
G.I. Tie wire Gauge # 16 D.C. 0.5 kg.
Forms Re-use from reservoir construction
Common nail Re-use from reservoir construction
TOTAL
B. LABOUR COST
ted
Form works
Laborer 4 1 150.00
Steel works
Steelperson 1 1 225.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00
Concrete works
Mason 1 2 225.00
Laborer 4 2 150.00
Removal of old pipe,
installation of new
Mason 1 1 225.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00
Ditching
Laborer 4 1 150.00
TOTAL 6

(P)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 960.50 960.50
LABOUR
Skilled 2 - 2,625.00 2,625.00
Unskilled 4 - 3,600.00 3,600.00
Detailed Estimates
TOTAL 6 6 - 7,185.50 7,185.50
Detailed Estimates
ITEM PIPELINE
A. MATERIALS
Particular Pipeline Section Quantity
Unit Section/ Length Compu-
Description Specs. Location ted Say
(m)
Pipes and fittings
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. a 500 83.33 84
G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. a 7.33 8
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. a 75
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. a 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 13 mm pc. a 1
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. a 1
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. a 0.5
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. a 1
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. a 2
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. a 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 19 mm pc. b 1

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 19 mm x 6 m pc. b 10 1.67 2
G.I. Coupling 19 mm pc. b 1
G.I. Union patente 19 mm pc. b 1
G.I. Tee 19 x 19 mm pc. b 1
G.I. Plug 19 mm pc. b 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 19 x 13 mm pc. b 1
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. b 0.5
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. b 1
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. b 2
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. b 1
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. c 1,200 200.00 200

G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. c 19.00 19
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. c 180
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. c 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 25 mm pc. d 1

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. d 20 3.33 4
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. d 1
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. d 2
G.I. Tee 25 x 25 mm pc. d 1
G.I. Plug 25 mm pc. d 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 25 x 13 mm pc. d 1
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. d 0.5
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. d 1
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. d 2
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. d 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. e 1

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. e 240 40.00 40
G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. e 3.00 3
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. e 36
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. e 1
Detailed Estimates
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 25 mm pc. f 1

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. f 320 53.33 54
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. f 4.33 5
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. f 48
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. f 1
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. f 0.5
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. f 1
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. f 2
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. f 1
Detailed Estimates
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 31 mm x 6 m pc. g 200 33.33 34

G.I. Union patente 31 mm pc. g 2.33 3
G.I. Coupling 31 mm pc. g 30
G.I. Tee 31 x 31 mm pc. g 1
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. g 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 31 x 13 mm pc. g 1
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. g 0.5
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. g 1
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. g 2
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. g 1
Brass Gate valve 38 mm pc. h 1

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. h 60 10.00 10
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. h 1
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. h 8
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. h 1
Brass Gate valve 25 mm pc. i 1

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. i 100 16.67 17
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. i 0.67 1
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. i 15
G.I. Tee 25 x 25 mm pc. i 1
G.I. Plug 25 mm pc. i 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 25 x 13 mm pc. i 1
G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 13 mm x 6 m pc. i 1
G.I. Coupling 13 mm pc. i 1
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees13 mm pc. i 2
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees25 mm pc. i 2
Brass Gate valve 13 mm pc. i 1
Brss Gate valve 25 mm pc. j 1

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 25 mm x 6 m pc. j 710 118.33 119
G.I. Union patente 25 mm pc. j 10.83 12
G.I. Coupling 25 mm pc. j 106
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees25 mm pc. j 3
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees38 mm pc. at reservoir overflow 2

Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. drain at spring box & res. 2
G.I.Nipple, sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. drain at spring box & res. 4
Perforated PVC Pipe 25 mm x 0.3 m pc. strainer at inlet of spring box 1
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. faucet at tap stands 6
Others (tools to be turned-over to the (BWSA) association)

Teflon seal tape 3/4 inch roll accessories 100
Pipe wrench 12 inches long unit tools 1
Pipe wrench 14 inches long unit tools 2
Pipe threader 13, 19, 25, set tools 1
31, 38 mm
Hack saw unit tools 1
Hack saw blade pc. tools 5
TOTAL 3,360
Detailed Estimates
B. LABOUR COST
ted
Pipe Threading 559.5
Supervisor 1 200 2.7975 3 250.00
Plumber 2 3 225.00
Laborer 8 3 150.00
Excavation, Laying
& Installation and
Backfilling 559.5
Supervisor 1 60 9.325 10 250.00
Plumber 2 10 225.00
Laborer 8 10 150.00
TOTAL 13

Particular Duration Manpower MD In Kind CASH
(P)
MATERIALS
Pipes & fittings 277,793.00 - 277,793.00
LABOUR
Skilled 13 - 9,100.00 9,100.00
Unskilled 13 - 15,600.00 15,600.00
TOTAL 13 277,793.00 24,700.00 302,493.00
Detailed Estimates
ITEM CREEK / RIVER CROSSING ( 2-Suspended type, 2-Submerged type)
A. MATERIALS
Volume ted
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) 0.48
Portland cement 40 kg. D.C. 5 bag
Sand D.C. 0.25 cu.m.
Gravel D.C. 0.5 cu.m.
G.I. Wire Gauge # 4 D.C. 1 roll
Gauge # 16 D.C. 2 kg.
16 mm x 6 m D.C. 8 pc.
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 D.C. 2 pc.
x 1/8 x 6 m
TOTAL
B. LABOUR COST
ted
(suspended)
Form & steel works
Laborer 6 1 150.00
Concrete casting
Laborer 6 1 150.00
Installation
Laborer 6 3 150.00
Instn. (submerged)
Laborer 6 1 150.00
TOTAL 6

(P)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 4,617.50 4,617.50
LABOUR
Skilled 6 1 - 1,500.00 1,500.00
Unskilled 6 6 - 5,400.00 5,400.00
TOTAL 6 7 - 11,517.50 11,517.50
Detailed Estimates
ITEM TAP STAND ( 6 Units )
A. MATERIALS
Volume ted
Concrete Class "B" (1:2.5:5) 1.218
Portland cement 40 kg. 7.5 9.135 9.5 bag
Sand 0.5 0.609 0.7 cu.m.
Gravel 1 1.218 1.3 cu.m.
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 D.C. 1.5 kg.
Forms Re-use from reservoir construction
Common nails Re-use from reservoir construction
TOTAL
B. LABOUR COST
ted
Concrete 1.218
Supervisor 1 1.5 0.812 1 250.00
Mason 1 1 225.00
Laborer 4 1 150.00
Form, Steelwork,
Excavation
Laborer 4 3 150.00
TOTAL 4

(P)
MATERIALS
Lumpsum - 3,074.50 3,074.50
LABOUR
Skilled 4 2 - 1,900.00 1,900.00
Unskilled 4 4 - 2,400.00 2,400.00
TOTAL 4 6 - 7,374.50 7,374.50
Detailed Estimates
n implementing the subproject by community force
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
140.00 5,320.00
250.00 532.50
350.00 1,155.00
22.00 770.00
70.00 2,870.00
77.00 1,771.00
43.00 129.00
375.00 6,750.00
53.00 2,650.00
30.00 750.00
35.00 105.00
22,802.50
Total
Labour
Cost
250.00
1,200.00
1,500.00
2,700.00
7,200.00
750.00
1,350.00
3,600.00
750.00
1,350.00
3,600.00
24,250.00
Percent
Weight
Detailed Estimates
(%)
48%
18%
33%
100%
Detailed Estimates
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
140.00 350.00
250.00 37.50
350.00 87.50
22.00 44.00
70.00 420.00
43.00 21.50
960.50
Total
Labour
Cost
250.00
225.00
600.00
250.00
225.00
600.00
500.00
450.00
1,200.00
250.00
225.00
600.00
250.00
600.00
6,225.00
Percent
Weight
(%)
13%
37%
50%
Detailed Estimates
100%
Detailed Estimates
Unit Total
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
550.00 46,200.00
88.00 704.00
32.00 2,400.00
42.00 42.00
30.00 30.00
20.00 20.00
184.00 92.00
12.00 12.00
15.00 30.00
65.00 65.00
28.00 28.00
285.00 570.00
20.00 20.00
47.00 47.00
24.00 24.00
8.00 8.00
20.00 20.00
184.00 92.00
12.00 12.00
15.00 30.00
65.00 65.00
468.00 93,600.00
88.00 1,672.00
32.00 5,760.00
42.00 42.00
26.00 26.00
332.00 1,328.00
62.00 62.00
24.00 48.00
32.00 32.00
12.00 12.00
25.00 25.00
184.00 92.00
12.00 12.00
15.00 30.00
65.00 65.00
32.00 32.00
468.00 18,720.00
88.00 264.00
32.00 1,152.00
30.00 30.00
Detailed Estimates
34.00 34.00
332.00 17,928.00
62.00 310.00
24.00 1,152.00
32.00 32.00
26.00 26.00
30.00 30.00
184.00 92.00
12.00 12.00
15.00 30.00
65.00 65.00
Detailed Estimates
468.00 15,912.00
88.00 264.00
32.00 960.00
42.00 42.00
20.00 20.00
30.00 30.00
184.00 92.00
12.00 12.00
15.00 30.00
65.00 65.00
205.00 205.00
550.00 5,500.00
116.00 116.00
41.00 328.00
52.00 52.00
102.00 102.00
332.00 5,644.00
62.00 62.00
24.00 360.00
32.00 32.00
12.00 12.00
25.00 25.00
184.00 184.00
12.00 12.00
15.00 30.00
35.00 70.00
65.00 65.00
102.00 102.00
332.00 39,508.00
62.00 744.00
24.00 2,544.00
35.00 105.00
60.00 120.00
245.00 490.00
44.00 176.00
27.00 27.00
65.00 390.00
20.00 2,000.00
550.00 550.00
650.00 1,300.00
6,000.00 6,000.00
85.00 85.00
40.00 200.00
277,793.00
Detailed Estimates
Total
Labour
Cost
750.00
1,350.00
3,600.00
2,500.00
4,500.00
12,000.00
24,700.00
Percent
Weight
(%)
92%
3%
5%
100%
Detailed Estimates
d type, 2-Submerged type)
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
140.00 700.00
250.00 62.50
350.00 175.00
1,500.00 1,500.00
43.00 86.00
77.00 770.00
103.00 824.00
250.00 500.00
4,617.50
Total
Labour
Cost
250.00
900.00
250.00
900.00
750.00
2,700.00
250.00
900.00
6,900.00
Percent
Weight
(%)
40%
13%
47%
100%
Detailed Estimates
Unit TOTAL
Cost Cost
(P) (P)
140.00 1,330.00
250.00 175.00
350.00 455.00
70.00 1,050.00
43.00 64.50
3,074.50
Total
Labour
Cost
250.00
225.00
600.00
750.00
675.00
1,800.00
4,300.00
Percent
Weight
(%)
42%
26%
33%
100%
Isometric View of tapstand
KALAHI-CIDSS Sub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title
Project TAP STAND
Sheet Title
Location Checked Isometric View
Scale Conc. Mix
NTS "B"(1:2.5:5)
Plan and Reinforcement Detail of tapstand
Project TAP STAND
Sheet Title
Location Checked Plan and Reinforcement Details
Scale Conc. Mix
NTS "B"(1:2.5:5)
BAR SCHEDULE
Total Quantity of 6-meter
Bar Diagram Dia. Spacing Length Quantity Length lenght Bar
10 mm
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (pcs.)
A 10 0.3 1 4 4
B 10 0.3 1.5 3 4.5
C 10 - 0.75 4 3
D 10 0.3 0.7 3 2.1
TOTAL 13.6 2.5
TABLE OF QUANTITIES
Particular Unit Quantity Remarks
Description Specs.
For one tap stand
Concrete "B" (1:2.5:5) cu.m. 0.2 Concrete Class "B"
Portland Cement 40 kg. bag 1.5
Sand cu.m 0.1 (5 cans)
Gravel cu.m 0.2 (10 cans)
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 2.5
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 kg. 0.25
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 0 Re-use from reservoir
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Common nails kg. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Project TAP STAND
Sheet Title
Location Checked Table of Quantities
Scale Conc. Mix
NTS "B"(1:2.5:5)
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
1 of 3
Sub-Project No.
Plan and Reinforcement Details

Sheet No.
2 of 3
Quantity of 6-meter
lenght Bar
12 mm
(pcs.)
Remarks
Concrete Class "B"
Re-use from reservoir

Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
3 of 3
RESERVOIR WS
2.20
0.10 1.30 0.10 0.60 0.10
Handle
0.10
0.10 max. W. L. L
Inlet pipe
(25 mm)
A B
C
2.00
min. W. L.
0.10 slope
0.10
0.20
H E
0.10
G F
0.30 0.30
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir details for Annex 1b

RESERVOIR WS
KALAHI-CIDSSSub-Project Name Prepared Drawing Title

Project RESERVOIR (8 m3)
Sheet Title
Location Checked Section and Reinforcement Detail
Scale Conc. Mix
NTS "A" (1:2:4)

RESERVOIR WS
2.20
0.10 0.10
1.40 0.60
0.10
K 0.70
0.60
0.70
0.10
J
A

RESERVOIR WS

Sheet Title
Location Checked Plan and Reinforcement Detail
Scale Conc. Mix
NTS "A" (1:2:4)

RESERVOIR WS
BAR SCHEDULE
Total Quantity of 6-meter
Bar Diagram Dia. Spacing Length Quantity Length lenght Bar
10 mm
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (pcs.)
A 12 0.23 2.8 33 92.4
B 12 0.23 2.75 3 8.25
C 10 0.23 2.35 44 103.4 18
D 10 0.23 2.35 20 47 8
E 12 0.23 0.8 36 28.8
F 10 - 2.55 4 10.2 2
G 10 - 2 4 8 2
H 10 0.23 0.35 36 12.6 3
I 10 0.24 2.35 9 21.15 4
J 10 0.23 1.6 4 6.4 2
K 10 0.23 1 6 6 1
L 10 0.24 0.85 8 6.8 1
TOTAL 41
TABLE OF QUANTITIES
Description Specs.
Concrete (1:2:4) = (9:0.5:1) cu.m 3.26 Concrete Class "A"

Plaster (1:2) cu.m 0.3
Portland Cement 40 kg. bag 38
Sahara compound Waterproofing compound pack 35
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 41

RESERVOIR WS
12 mm x 6 m pc. 23
G.I. Wire # 16 kg. 3
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 18
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 50
Common nails #4 kg. 25
# 1-1/2 kg. 3

Sheet Title
Scale Conc. Mix
"A" (1:2:4)

RESERVOIR WS
Screened
overflow pipe
(38 mm)
Gate valve
Outlet pipe
(38 mm)
Drain pipe
(50 mm)
ground level

RESERVOIR WS
Sub-Project No.
on and Reinforcement Detail

Sheet No.
1 of 3

RESERVOIR WS
2.20

RESERVOIR WS
Sub-Project No.
and Reinforcement Detail

Sheet No.
2 of 3

RESERVOIR WS
Quantity of 6-meter
lenght Bar
12 mm
(pcs.)
16
23
Remarks
Concrete Class "A"

RESERVOIR WS
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
3 of 3

KALAHI-CID
Project
Sub-Project Name
Elevation and Reinforcement of Spring Box

Location
Drawing Title
SPRING BOX
Sheet Title
Elevation and Reinforc
Scale
1 : 20 meters
Prepared
Checked
Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CID
Project
Project Name
Plan and Reinforcement of Spring Box
Location
Drawing Title
SPRING BOX
Sheet Title
Plan and Reinforceme
Scale
1 : 20 meters
Prepared
Checked
Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CID
Project
Sub-Project NameSub-
Manhole cover
Location
Drawing Title
SPRING BOX
Sheet Title
Manhole Cover
Scale
1 : 20 meters
Prepared
Checked
Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Elevation and Reinforcement
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
1 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Plan and Reinforcement
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
2 of 4
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Sub-Project NameSub-
Manhole Cover
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
3 of 4
BAR SCHEDULE-SPRING BOX
Total Quantity of 6-meter KALAHI-CIDSS

Bar Diagram Dia. Spacing Length Quantity Length lenght Bar Project
10 mm 12 mm
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (pcs.) (pcs.)
A 10 0.2 1.3 4 5.2 1
B 10 0.2 1.2 4 4.8 1 Sub-Project Name
C 10 0.2 0.6 3 1.8 1
D 10 0.2 0.3 3 0.9 1 Location
E 10 0.24 0.85 8 6.8 2 Drawing Title

SPRING BOX
TOTAL 6 Sheet Title

Elevation and Reinforcem
TABLE OF QUANTITIES Scale

Description Specs.
Concrete "A" (1:2:4) cu.m 0.224 Concrete Class "A" Prepared
Portland Cement 40 kg. bag 3
Sahara compound pack 2 Checked
G.I. wire Gauge # 16 kg. 0.5
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 0 Re-use from reservoir Sub-Project No.
KALAHI-CIDSS
Project
Elevation and Reinforcement
Concrete Mix
"A" (1:2:4)
Sheet No.
4 of 4
Project CREEK / RIVER CROSSING
Sheet Title
Location Checked Profile (Suspended type)
Scale
NTS
Sheet Title
Location Checked Profile (Submerged type)
Scale
NTS
Sheet Title
Location Checked Concrete Post Reinforcement Detail
Scale
NTS
TABLE OF QUANTITIES
Description Specs.
Suspended crossing
Concrete Class "A" (1:2:4) cu.m. 0.48 For the two concrete posts
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 5
Sand cu.m. 0.25 (13 cans)
Gravel cu.m. 0.5 (25 cans)
RSB 12 mm x 6 m pc. 6 For stirrups
16 mm x 6 m pc. 8 For vertical bars
G.I. Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 2 As tie wire
Gauge # 4 roll 1 As suspension wire
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x pc. 2 To hold the pipeline and where the
1/8 x 6 m suspension wire is attached to
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 0 Re-use from reservoir
Submerged crossing
RSB 12 mm x 6 m pc. 4 To anchor pipeline to river bed when
crossing under water. (One hook = 1 m)

Sheet Title
Scale
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
1 of 4
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
2 of 4
Sub-Project No.
Concrete Post Reinforcement Detail

Sheet No.
3 of 4
Sub-Project No.
Sheet No.
4 of 4
(REHABILITATION / IMPROVEMENT)
PANURAN SPRING DEVELOMENT

PROGRAM OF WORK

DETAILED ESTIMATE

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM

DRAWINGS

RESERVOIR CAPACITY DESIGN
and
PIPELINE DESIGN and ANALYSIS

SPRING BOX

RESERVOIR

TAPSTAND

RIVER / CREEK CROSSING

BAR CHART

SUMMARY OF MATERIALS

UNIT COST OF MATERIALS

SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
Particular
Description Specs. Unit Qty. Remarks
A. Pipes and fittings

G.I. Pipe, sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. 10
31 mm x 6 m pc. 358
25 mm x 6 m pc. 194
19 mm x 6m pc. 2
13 mm x 6 m pc. 3
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. 1
31 mm pc. 33
25 mm pc. 18
19 mm pc. 1
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. 8
31 mm pc. 321
25 mm pc. 171
19 mm pc. 1
13 mm pc. 6
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 38 mm pc. 2
25 mm pc. 3
13 mm pc. 12
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees 25 mm pc. 2
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. 1
31 x 31 mm pc. 5
25 x 25 mm pc. 2
19 x 19 mm pc. 1
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. 1
38 x 25 mm pc. 1
31 x 25 mm pc. 2
31 x 19 mm pc. 1
31 x 13 mm pc. 3
25 x 13 mm pc. 2
19 x 13 mm pc. 1
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. 2
25 mm pc. 2
19 mm pc. 1
Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. 2
38 mm pc. 1
25 mm pc. 1
13 mm pc. 6
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. 6
G.I. Nipple sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. 4
Perforated PVC pipe 31 mm x 0.3m pc. 1
KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Summary of Materials - page 164 of 191

B. Accessories
Teflon sealing tape 3/4 inch roll 100

C. Tools
Pipe Wrench 12 inches long pc. 1
14 inches long pc. 2
Pipe Threader 13, 19, 25, set 1
31, 38 mm
Hacksaw pc. 1
Hacksaw blade pc. 5
D. Others
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 55
Sahara compound pack 37
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 18
Rough lumber 2" x 2' x 8' pc. 50
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x 1/8 x 6 m pc. 2
12 mm x 6 m pc. 33
16 mm x 6 m pc. 8
G.I. Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 7
Gauge # 4 roll 1
Common nails #4 kg. 25
# 1-1/2 kg. 3
Sand cu.m. 3.23
Gravel cu.m. 5.35

UNIT COST OF MATERIALS
Particular Unit Unit Remarks

Description Specs. Cost
A. Pipes and Fittings

G.I. Pipe sched. 40 38 mm x 6 m pc. 550.00
do 31 mm x 6 m pc. 468.00
do 25 mm x 6 m pc. 332.00
do 19 mm x 6 m pc. 285.00
do 13 mm x 6 m pc. 184.00
G.I. Union patente 38 mm pc. 116.00
do 31 mm pc. 88.00
do 25 mm pc. 62.00
do 19 mm pc. 47.00
G.I. Coupling 38 mm pc. 41.00
do 31 mm pc. 32.00
do 25 mm pc. 24.00
do 19 mm pc. 20.00
do 13 mm pc. 12.00
G.I. Elbow, 90 degrees 38 mm pc. 60.00
do 25 mm pc. 35.00
do 13 mm pc. 15.00
G.I. Elbow, 45 degrees 25 mm pc. 35.00
G.I. Tee 38 x 38 mm pc. 52.00
do 31 x 31 mm pc. 42.00
do 25 x 25 mm pc. 32.00
do 19 x 19 mm pc. 24.00
G.I. Reducer Bushing 38 x 31 mm pc. 32.00
do 38 x 25 mm pc. 34.00
do 31 x 25 mm pc. 26.00
do 31 x 19 mm pc. 28.00
do 31 x 13 mm pc. 30.00
do 25 x 13 mm pc. 25.00
do 19 x 13 mm pc. 20.00
G.I. Plug 31 mm pc. 20.00
do 25 mm pc. 12.00
do 19 mm pc. 8.00
Brass Gate valve 50 mm pc. 245.00
do 38 mm pc. 205.00
do 25 mm pc. 102.00
do 13 mm pc. 65.00
Brass Faucet 13 mm pc. 65.00
G.I. Nipple, sched. 40 50 mm x 0.3 m pc. 44.00
Perforated PVC Pipe 25 mm x 0.3 m pc. 27.00
KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT Unit Cost of Materials - page 167 of 191

B. Accessories
Teflon sealing tape 3/4 inch wide roll 20.00

C. Tools
Pipe Wrench 12 inches long unit 550.00
do 14 inches long unit 650.00
Pipe Threader Set (one handle, set 6,000.00
one 13 mm (1/2),
one 19 mm (3/4),
one 25 mm (1),
one 31 mm (1-1/4),
one 38 mm (1-1/2))
Hacksaw unit 85.00
Hacksaw Blade pc. 40.00
D. Others
Portland cement 40 kg. bag 140.00
Sahara compound pack 22.00
Marine plywood 1/4" x 4' x 8' sheet 375.00
Rough lumber 2"x 2' x 8' pc. 53.00
Steel angle bar 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 x 1/8 x 6 m pc. 250.00
RSB 10 mm x 6 m pc. 70.00
12 mm x 6 m pc. 77.00
16 mm x 6 m pc. 103.00
G.I.Wire Gauge # 16 kg. 43.00
Gauge # 4 roll 1,500.00
Common nail #4 kg. 30.00
# 1-1/2 kg. 35.00

PROGRAM OF WORK WS

Barangay ____________________________
Municipality of __________________________
Province of ____________________________
SUB-PROJECT PROGRAM OF WORKs
Sub-Project Title
Category
Physical Target
Total Sub-Project Cost
Project Description: Sub-Project Duration

Equipment Needed
Technical Personnel
Scope of Work %
Item No. Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
(Direct Cost) Wt.
Total
Breakdown Estimated Sources of Fund
Project Cost KALAHI-
Community Local Gov't.Units Other Source Total Cost
CIDSS Grant
A. Direct Cost
Materials Cost
KALAHI CIDSS PROJECT 1 of 2

PROGRAM OF WORK WS
Equipment Rental
Labor Cost:
a. Skilled
b. Unskilled
Sub-Total A

PROGRAM OF WORK WS
B. Indirect Cost
Pre-Engineering
Supervision
Contractor's Profit
Taxes
Hand Tools
Material Testing
Admin and Overhead
Sub-Total B
TOTAL (A+B)
ADD: Contingency
%
Total Estimated Cost
ADD: O&M (Other amenities)
Grand Total
Prepared by: Approved by:
Sevice Provider/Municipal Engineer BSPMC Chairperson
Reviewed by: Concurred by:
Deputy Area Coordinator Barangay Chairperson
Noted:
Municipal Mayor
Regional Infrastructure Engineer
Note: Costing to be used on the MIBF will be the Total Estimated Cost

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE WS
BARANGAY SUB-PROJECT WORK SCHEDULE & PHYSICAL PROGRESS REPORT

For the Month of __________________, 200___
Name of Sub-project: ___________________________________ Total Sub-Project Cost:_______________________

Physical Target: _____________________________ Direct Cost:
Region: __________________________________ Indirect cost:
Province : __________________________________ Date Started:________________________________
Municipality : _______________________________ Target Completion Date: ______________________
Barangay: __________________________________ Mode of Implementation:
I. To be filled up by Deputy Area Coordinator

WEIGHT Physical Previous
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT AMOUNT
(%) Target Cumm. Month 1
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
TOTAL 0 0
II To be filled up by Deputy Area Coordinator

PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (PLANNED)
CUMULATIVE
PHYSICAL

PHYSICAL
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (ACTUAL)
CUMULATIVE
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (PLANNED)
CUMULATIVE
CASH FLOW
PERIODIC
% PROGRESS (ACTUAL)
CUMULATIVE
III. Major Issues Encountered: IV. Recommendations
Prepared by: _____________________________ Concurred by:

PIT Chair/Skilled Person/Contractor Monitoring Team Leader
Approved by: _____________________________ _____________________

BSPMC Chairperson Deputy Area Coordinator
Note: Attach Material Records Sheet if physical accomplishment lags behind financial disbursements.

CAL PROGRESS REPORT

200___
Labor Ave.
Generat Total No. of Days Rate/Da
ed S-Curve
y
Male
Skilled
Female
Male
Unskilled
Female
TOTAL
DURATION
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recommendations
_____________________
Monitoring Team Leader Municipal Engineer
Noted:
Regional Infrastructure Engineer

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS WS
Municipality/Province:
Name of Subproject:
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:
A. Summary of Program of Work
Investment Cost 2,759,112.68 Percentage

Material Cost 1,715,616.20 62.18 62.18
Labor Cost 554,953.58 20.11
Supervision Cost 488,542.90 17.71 37.82
Total 100.00
Maintenance Cost 303,502.39 (11% of investment cost in the absence of actual computation)
B. Basic Data and Assumptions

Assumptions Factors Financial Economic
Values Values
Investment Cost 2,759,113 2,672,808
Material Cost as a percent of investment 62.18 1,715,616 1,921,490
Foreign component 60% 1,029,370 1,235,244
Local component 40% 686,246 686,246
Labor Cost as a percent of investment 37.82 1,043,496 751,317
Unskilled labor 70% 730,448 438,268.52
Skilled labor 30% 313,049 313,049
Maintenance Cost per Year 303,502.39 297,432
Material Cost as a percent of maintenance 50% 151,751 169,961
Foreign component 60% 91,050.72 109,261
Local component 40% 60,700.48 60,700
Labor Cost as a percent of maintenance 50% 151,751.20 127,471
Unskilled labor 40% 60,700 36,420.29
Skilled labor 60% 91,051 91,051
Adjustment factor for Forex 1.2
Adjustment factor for Unskilled labor 0.6
Benefits
Population in the area directly serviced by the PWS 1,530 1,530
Average household size 6 6
Revenue (Water fee per household) - -
Percent economically active population (LFPR) 72%

Daily wage rate 150 90
Number of working days a year 315 315
Annual wage rate 47,250 28,350
Wage rate per hour 19 11
Mortality rate 0.00%
Morbidity rate 3.97%
Number of days inactive due to water borne illness 5 5
Average medical expenses 500 300
Hours per year for fetching water without project for the total HH 730 730
Hours per year for fetching water with project for the total HH 183 183

C. Benefit - Cost Analysis
Investment Cost Total Economic Reduction Reduction Savings in Time

Year Materials Unskilled Skilled Maintenance Cost Water in in Medical Savings5
Labor Labor Cost Revenue1 Mortality2 Morbidity Expenses4
3
0 1,921,490 438,269 313,049 3,341,010

1 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
2 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
3 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
4 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
5 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
6 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
7 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
8 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
9 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
10 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
11 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
12 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
13 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
14 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
15 297,432 297,432 - - 19,680 13,120 1,130,861
1/ (Served population/average household size) x Water fee per household x 12 months NPV at 15%
2/ (Served population x Mortality rate x LFPR x Annual wage rate) EIRR
3/ Served population x Morbidity rate x LFPR x Daily wage rate x days inactive B/C Ratio
4/ Served population x Morbidity rate x LFPR x medical expense
5/ (Served population/average household size) x LFPR x (Hours fetching water w/o project - Hours
fetching water w/ project) x Wage rate per hour
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS:
DECREASE BENEFIT
DECREASE BENEFIT
DECREASE BENEFIT
COST INCREASE COST INCREASE
5 10 15 0 0 0

DECREASE BENEFIT
DECREASE BENEFIT
DECREASE BENEFIT
0 1.57 1.52 1.48 5 1.54

0 10 1.45
0 15 1.37
0 20 1.29
Case 1 Increase in Cost Case 2 Decrease in Benefit Case 3 Increase in Cost an

Total Incremental
Benefits Benefits
- (3,341,010)
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
581,830.695 284,398
P (1,678,027)
3%
0.67
COST INCREASE
5 10 15 20 25

5 1.28 1.25 1.22 1.19

10 1.21 1.18 1.15 1.13
15 1.15 1.12 1.09 1.06
20 1.08 1.05 1.03 1.15
50 0.70
Case 3 Increase in Cost and Decrease in Benefit

CONSTANT DISCHARGE AQUIFER PUMPING TEST DATA
Name of Sub-project :
Location :
Well No./Name :
Well Depth :
Pump Type :
Pump Setting :
Static Water Level :
Time Pump Started :
Time Pump Stopped :
CLOCK Time After FLOW WATER DRAW SPECIFIC

READING Pump Started (Q) LEVEL DOWN CAPACITY
min. lps m m lps/m
0
0.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
16
18
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
420
480
540
600
660
720
780
840
900
960
1020
1080
1140
1200
1260
1320
1380
1440
Pumping Test Conducted by: Noted:

RECOVERY TEST DATA
Name of Project :
Location :
Well No./Name :
Well Depth :
Static Water Level :
Recovery Started :
Recovery Stopped :
CLOCK Time AfterTime After WATER RESIDUAL

RATIO
TIME Pump Started Pump Stopped LEVEL DDOWN
t(minutes) t' (minutes) (t/t') m m
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1452
1454
1456
1458
1460
1465
1470
1475
1480
1485
1490
1500
1510
1520
1530
1540
1550
1560
1590
1620
1650
1680
1710
1740
1770
1800
1860
1920
1980
2040
2100
2160
2220
2280
2340
2400
2460
2520
2580
2640
2700
2760
2820
2880
2940
Recovery Test Conducted by: Noted:

NSTANT DISCHARGE AQUIFER PUMPING TEST DATA
REMARKS
RECOVERY TEST DATA
REMARKS

Detailed Estimate

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detailed Estimate

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detailed Estimate

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How is reservoir capacity calculated?

How is reservoir capacity calculated?

What factors are considered in reservoir sizing?

What factors are considered in reservoir sizing?

Reservoir Sizing Planning and Design WS

Name of Sub-Project Err:509

A. Reason for installing a reservoir

B. Location of the reservoir

Reason for choosing the location.

C. Capacity of the reservoir

Reservoir capacity = 1/4 (ADD)

Reservoir capacity = (Demand-Supply)(Ave. Day Length)

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----1of 2

Reservoir capacity = (Spring discharge)(Ave. Day Length)

Reservoir capacity = 5.24 cu.m.

5) Reason for adoption

Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 1.74 cum

Therefore width length height

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----2of 2

ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

DEMAND-SUPPLY ANALYSIS BASED ON THE AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND (ADD)

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----3of 2

5 0.48 419.28 1,380.13 2,880.00 2,460.72

Dimension (r.cap.)^1/3 = 3.64 m.

Therefore width length height

ECONOMICAL STORAGE CAPACITY

Ratio Storage Capacity Ratio

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----4of 2

3.0-4.0 of the average daily used

> 4.0 no storage facility required 3.29708

TYPICAL WATER DEMAND VARIATION

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----5of 2

, fire hydrant reserve, settling or point of

the distribution areas.

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----6of 2

if + answer the size is OK

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----7of 2

TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS

Minimum Time to Fill

emand and supply-the minimum

water consumption per capita

OM WATER DEMAND VARIATION:

SUPPLY MINUS STORAGE

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----8of 2

if + answer the size is OK

TIME FACTOR ANALYSIS

Minimum Time to Fill

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----9of 2

emand and supply-the minimum

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Reservoir Sizing for Annex 1----10of 2

II -PIPELINE DESIGN ANALYSIS :

Additional: Consider most economical pipe size and layout

Additonal: Best location of tank ( if any)

A. Pipeline Design Input/Output

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 11of 4

KALAHI-CIDSS PROJECT Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis for Annex 1 12of 4

PF = 2.5 x GRF x N x Average Household Size x PCWC / 86,400