FT-770RH Review 1986
FT-770RH Review 1986
FT-770RH Review 1986
TESTS
YAE SU UHF F!k rRANSCEfV£R F T-770RH M PMS VFO T CALL
111,' ON AIR
ROSY
A VOL MIC
Y SIPO
r--- 3 5
24 please mention AMATEUR RADIO when replying to any advertisement JULY 1986
G3OSS".:TÉSTS
than to indicate the presence of a signal
which is at least fairly strong, but which is .10
normally audible anyway.
17771 1'f
The FM capture ratio measured very
well, showing that the rig discriminates a
strong signal from a weaker one on the
same channel very well indeed. Distor-
tion around the discriminator was about
i ; I
Li I
i
I
i
11
-T1 I
,
1.5%, but it was rather odd that the t.. _
highest distortion of 2.75% was noted at
--r----I
' I !
I
-1*--"*--4---r-T--1--F-'1' --I
i i i¡
--I-
hitting the edges of the IF bandwidth.
fitJTi'T11
I I
;
125
TrI
¡i1,
i
250
500
tlii lk
2k
4k
Audio response
The reproduced audio response, published plot shows that the transmit- be tucked almost anywhere under a
charted with 750µsec pre -emphasis in ted response is within 6dB or so from dashboard. In the context of operation
the transmitted modulation, showed 6dB 200Hz to 4kHz, and is thus appreciably on the 70cm band, I feel that it can be
down points at 200Hz and 2.3kHz; the wider than the receive response. feel I
recommended highly, although you will
response curtailing quite rapidly above this is about right in practice for the UK need to watch that there is adequate
2.5kHz. might have preferred a slightly
I market, although inappropriate for ventilation space behind it. would like I
wider response on a 70cm rig, although 12.5kHz chanelling. We noted only 1% to thank Amcomm ARE Ltd for the loan of
this response would be about ideal on a THD at 4.5kHz deviation and this is the review sample, and Roy Brooker, for
2m rig where 12.5kHz channelling is now excellent, the transmitted signal-to- helping me with all the tests. Another
in regular use. noise ratio being very good. most useful Yaesu product.
The transmitting sectiorf produced
26W output from a 13.8V dc supply from Conclusion Reference
low to mid -band, but an increase to 28W It is remarkable how rigs have got Amcomm ARE Ltd,
was noted at the top end. The rig typically smaller and smaller over the years, while 373 Uxbridge Road,
gave 2.5W in the low power position. Tx output powers have usefully gone up. London W3 9RN
Maximum dc current drawn was 6.4A, the This little rig worked very well and could Tel: 01-992 5765/6
receiver drawing around 280mA unless
the volume is turned well up.
A brief check for RF harmonics showed
that both the second and third were
below -70dB ref the fundamental, which rd - -
.....z....,
Transmitted frequency 4
The transmitted frequency accuracy
was originally only 170Hz out, but as the
rig warmed up the error rose to around
280Hz. After an extremely long over, the I;
i'
- -r,
maximum error was 380Hz; the repeater
.
-
shift however being extremely accurate. í f(!
Any frequency errors noted are of no real
.
significance, and it can be seen that the
internal crystal is within one part in 106,
even when coping with a large tempera-
ture change.
We checked the transmitted frequency
response from the input of the mic
socket to the output carrier, which was
subject to 75012,sec de -emphasis in the
Marconi 2305 modulation test set. The
JULY 1986 please mention AMATEUR RADIO when replying to any advertisement 25