STS

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Mark Gerald N. Pagaduan Prof.

Ligaya Villanueva

1CMT4 March 3, 2020

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
      
BEFORE
DO NOT
COMPLETING
PLAGIARIZE!
THIS REVIEW
RESPOND TO
ASSESSMENT, FOLLOW ANSWER PLEASE YOUR
THE PLAGIARISM
PLEASE READ THE IN MAKE YOUR WORK
REQUIREMEN IS A MAJOR
ALL OF THE INSTRUCTIO ESSAY HANDWRITIN BEFORE
TS OF THE OFFENSE
INSTRUCTIONS NS. FORM. G LEGIBLE. SUBMITTI
TASK. THAT LEADS
THOROUGHLY NG IT.
TO
AND
EXPULSION.
CAREFULLY.

The Concept of the Public Good: A View from a Filipino Philosopher


Title of the Article

1. Difficult Concepts (What concepts did you find difficult to understand?)


 Politicoethical sense of Public Goods
 Private Public Goods
 Difference of Public Public Goods and Public Goods

2. Insights (What new insights or learnings did you gain in discussion/ activity?)

 Before reading the article, I thought that the concept of public good is about the
characteristic of a person in a public. However, reading the article/understanding the
lesson, I now think/realize that the public good is about the product that is consume by
people and benefits of the community or the public. It is also “non-rivalrous” and “non-
excludable” which means the availability of the good does not decrease the use and goods
are also accessible by anyone without an exemption.

 Before reading the article/understanding the lesson, I thought that Homo economicus and
Homo politicus almost have the same meaning in a way that they are both after the profit
based on what I see in our said Politicians. However, reading the article/understanding
the lesson, I now think/realize that their difference is Homo economicus is a selfish
individual who desires to satisfy his or her own needs and wants with the help of his own
money. He does not care about the others unless they will benefit from each other (e.g.
Businessman) while Homo politicus is a political individual who desires his and his
people needs and wants. He is an individual that acts in the public good (e.g.
government). But neither of them can be empirically observed in its pure form.

 Before reading the article/understanding the lesson, I thought that Mixed Public Goods
are profit-oriented since it is under private organizations or private groups. However,
reading the article/understanding the lesson, I now think/realize that the Mixed Public
Goods is a service-oriented which has the content of both public good and private good
and even if they are undertaken by private organizations/groups because they do not seek
for profits, yet they seek for service.

3. Questions (What questions would you want answers for? Or vague areas you want more
explanations about?

 If there are national public goods, would it possible to have a global public goods?
 According to article, building a dam in ancestral land is a national public good. But why
does leaving it as ancestral lands cannot be considered as national public goods, where in
fact, their resources are beneficial not only within the community but also within our
country.
 Sometimes, when there is a project by national people in the ancestral lands, even if the
communal people refused to accept their offers, the project will be push through. In this
case, where are the rights of the communal people?
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
      
BEFORE
DO NOT
COMPLETING
PLAGIARIZE!
THIS REVIEW
RESPOND TO
ASSESSMENT, FOLLOW ANSWER PLEASE YOUR
THE PLAGIARISM
PLEASE READ THE IN MAKE YOUR WORK
REQUIREMEN IS A MAJOR
ALL OF THE INSTRUCTIO ESSAY HANDWRITIN BEFORE
TS OF THE OFFENSE
INSTRUCTIONS NS. FORM. G LEGIBLE. SUBMITTI
TASK. THAT LEADS
THOROUGHLY NG IT.
TO
AND
EXPULSION.
CAREFULLY.

Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis


Title of the Article

1. Difficult Concepts (What concepts did you find difficult to understand?)


 French Psychopathology
 Syphilis Infection
 Degeneration

2. Insights (What new insights or learnings did you gain in discussion/ activity?)

 Before reading the article/understanding the lesson, I thought that there was no particular
therapy that can cure mental disorders such as anxiety, depression and hysteria, in other
words, making the unconscious individual to subconscious and up to conscious.
However, reading the article/understanding the lesson, I now think/realize that
psychoanalysis in not just a theory made by Sigmund Freud but also a therapy that can
cure brain diseases by releasing repressed emotions and memories of an individual.

 Before reading the article/understanding the lesson, I thought that dreaming is just an
experience that a person is experiencing while he/she while sleeping. I did not thing that
it has a lot to do in curing the mental disorder of a person. However, reading the
article/understanding the lesson, I now think/realize that when you analyze the pattern of
someone’s dream, it can give a valuable insight into the unconscious mind of a person. In
other words, analyzing or interpreting the pattern of someone’s dream is another therapy
to cure a mental disorder like hysteria and such.
 Before reading the article/understanding the lesson, I thought that it is just the brain and
the other parts of body (except for the mind) that is responsible in paralysis. However,
reading the article/understanding the lesson, I now think/realize that the mind is also
responsible in paralysis. An example from the article, when French worker had a beam
fallen into his arm, he had the thought that he cannot move his arm, yet his arm was fine.
But after a day his arm became paralyzed. It became paralyzed because his body operated
an unconscious idea. His mind become unconscious that it caused a paralysis of the
imagination.

3. Questions (What questions would you want answers for? Or vague areas you want more
explanations about?
 Why is Psychoanalysis cannot be considered as science even if, it can cure mental
disorders?
 Is it possible that a person is conscious while he/she was dreaming?
 What is the difference between psychoanalysis and psychotherapy?

You might also like