0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views3 pages

DESIGN

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

DESIGN CODES

The design and construction of continuous composite bridges is covered by British Standard

BS 5400: Steel, concrete and composite bridges [5] . The document combines codes of
practice to cover the design and construction of bridges and specifications for the loads,
materials and workmanship. It is based on the principles of limit state design. It comprises
the following Parts:

2
DESIGN CODES

2.1 BS 5400

The design and construction of continuous composite bridges is covered by British Standard

BS 5400: Steel, concrete and composite bridges [5] . The document combines codes of
practice to cover the design and construction of bridges and specifications for the loads,
materials and workmanship. It is based on the principles of limit state design. It comprises
the following Parts:

Part 1 General statement

Part 2 Specification for loads

Part 3 Code of practice for design of steel bridges

Part 4 Code of practice for design of concrete


bridges Part 5 Code of practice for design of
composite bridges Part 6 Specification for materials
and workmanship, steel
Part 7 Specification for materials and workmanship, concrete, reinforcement and
prestressing tendons

Part 8 Recommendations for materials and workmanship, concrete, reinforcement and


prestressing tendons

Part 9 Bridge bearings


Part Code of practice for fatigue
10

The general principles of the limit state design approach are given in Part 1. Part 1 states that
two limit states are adopted in BS 5400, the ultimate limit state (ULS) and the serviceability
limit state (SLS). The criterion for structural adequacy is expressed as:
R*≥S*
i.e. the design resistance R* (based on nominal strength divided by partial factors) shall be
at least equal to the design load effects S* (based on nominal loads multiplied by other partial
factors)—see Clauses 1/2.3 and 1/5.
Part 2 specifies loads that are to be taken into account in the design. Parts 3, 4, 5 and 10 are
Codes, which are manuals of good practice for the design of bridges. Implicit in the Codes is
the assumption that workmanship and materials will be in accordance with the Specifications
of Parts 6 and 7. These two Parts are written in a form suitable for incorporation in contract
documents. In particular, Part 6 provides a comprehensive specification for the various forms
of steel (plates, sections, bolts, welds, etc.) and the quality of workmanship employed in
fabrication and erection.
In Part 3 (as amended in 2000), reference is made to a number of product standards for the
steel material, the most commonly recognised of which is BS EN 10025. Part 6 makes
reference to thes
testing, etc. Seeefurther
and other supporting
comment standards
in Section 2.6. for materials, workmanship, inspection and

2.2 Interrelation of Parts 3, 4 and 5 of BS 5400

Part 5 of BS 5400 deals with the design of composite bridges, but provides detailed
requirements only for the interaction between steel and composite elements. Design of the
separate elements is referred to Parts 3 and 4 of the Standard.
A particular point to note when using Parts 3, 4 and 5 is the different way in which the
partial factor γf3 is applied. In Part 3 (steel bridges) the calculated strengths are divided by
this factor for comparison with the load effects, whereas in Part 4 (concrete bridges) the
strengths are compared against the load effects multiplied by the factor. Care must therefore
be taken when applying γ f3 It is suggested that γf3 is consistently applied on the strength side
for all elements of composite structures, both steel and concrete; this approach has been

adopted for the Worked examples[1].


Attention is also drawn to the differ ent treatments of the partial f actor γ m. Part 3 gives
values for γm that are to be applied in various circumstances to expressions for design
strengths (resistances); the facto r is explicitly included. In Part 4, γ m is often implicitly
included in expressions for design strength (such as ULS moment resistance of a slab).

You might also like