No. 116 Performance Standard For Protective Coatings For Cargo Oil Tanks of Crude Oil Tankers No. 116
No. 116 Performance Standard For Protective Coatings For Cargo Oil Tanks of Crude Oil Tankers No. 116
No. 116 Performance Standard For Protective Coatings For Cargo Oil Tanks of Crude Oil Tankers No. 116
116
No.
No. Performance Standard for Protective Coatings
116
116 for Cargo Oil Tanks of Crude Oil Tankers
(cont)
(Feb
2011) 5 years field exposure test in accordance with MSC.288 (87)
(Rev.1
Feb 1. Introduction
2013)
This recommendation provides an interim solution on the method of the 5 year field
procedure given in table 1.1.3 of MSC.288 (87).
2.1 Coating manufacturer’s records, should include the information indicated in 2.2.1 and
should be examined to confirm coating system has 5 years field exposure, and the current
product is the same as that being assessed.
2.2 Either class survey records should be reviewed, or a joint (coating manufacturer and
RO) survey of cargo tanks of a selected vessel should be carried out, to verify compliance
with the requirements of 2.1 and 2.6. The reporting of the coating condition in both cases
should be in accordance with the principles given in section 4 of MSC.1/Circ. 1330.
2.3 The selected vessel should have cargo tanks in regular use, of which:
2.4 In the case that the selected vessel does not meet the requirements in 2.3 then the
limitations on lowest pH and highest temperature of crude oils carried should be clearly stated
on the type approval certificate.
2.5 In all cases of approval by field exposure for 5 years, the shop primer should be
removed prior to application of the approved epoxy based system coating, unless it can be
No. confirmed that the shop primer applied during construction, is identical in formulation to that
applied in the selected vessel used as a basis of the approval.
116
(cont) 2.6 All cargo tanks should be in “GOOD” condition excluding mechanical damages, without
touch up or repair in the prior 5 years.
2.6.1 “Good” is defined as: Condition with spot rusting on less than 3% of the area under
consideration without visible failure of the coating. Rusting at edges or welds, must be on less
than 20% of edges or welds in the area under consideration.” “Area under consideration” is
the area defined as per PSPC-COT 4.4 and 4.5. In evaluating the figures given in the
definition, an under deck area and an inner bottom area are to be treated separately.
2.6.2 Examples of how to report coating conditions with respect to areas under consideration
should be as those given in the principles in section 4 of MSC.1/Circ. 1330.
2.7 If the applied NDFT is greater than required by the PSPC, the applied NDFT should be
the minimum to be applied during construction. This will be reported prominently on the Type
Approval Certificate.
2.8 If the results of the inspection are satisfactory, a Type Approval Certificate should be
issued to include both the epoxy based system and the shop primer. The Type Approval
Certificate should allow the use of the epoxy based system either with the named shop primer
or on bare prepared steel. The Type Approval Certificate should reference the inspection
report which should also form part of the Coating Technical File.
2.9 The Type Approval Certificate should be considered invalid if the formulation of either
the epoxy based system or the shop primer is changed. It is the responsibility of the coating
manufacturer to inform the RO that provided the Type Approval of any changes to the
formulation.
End of
Document