Lindenblatt 2010
Lindenblatt 2010
Lindenblatt 2010
S
kin grafting still represents the preferred cause long-term survival of cells within these con-
technique for covering skin defects.1 Despite structs demands the rapid establishment of ade-
the widespread use of this technique, we still quate blood supply.4 As a consequence, strategies
do not fully understand the precise cellular and are now directed toward engineering of pre-
vascular mechanisms involved with graft survival formed microvascular networks within tissue-en-
and incorporation. The development of tissue- gineered constructs.5 These developments sup-
engineered skin substitutes has reanimated the port efforts to understand the physiologic process
discussion about graft revascularization, because of graft revascularization and to establish new
these constructs still lack reliable incorporation models with which to study the revascularization
into the human body.2,3 This is in most cases be- of skin grafts or skin substitutes in vivo. Most re-
www.PRSJournal.com 61
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • July 2010
62
Volume 126, Number 1 • Angiogenic Transformation in Skin Grafts
Fig. 1. Images of the modified dorsal skinfold chamber. From the front of the chamber (above, left), the muscular wound bed
(panniculus carnosus) and the larger subcutaneous vessels are visible and accessible to intravital microscopy. Simultaneously,
the microcirculation of the skin graft can be visualized in vivo from the back (above, right). The microcirculation of the wound
bed showed a strong angiogenic response after 48 hours (below, left), leading to reperfusion of the graft capillaries after 72 hours
(below, right). Original magnification, ⫻200.
63
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • July 2010
Fig. 3. Skin graft microcirculation in the graft center and periphery over a period of 10 days. Functional capillary density (FCD) (above,
left), capillary diameter (CD) (below, left), capillary blood flow velocity (RBV) (above, right), and density of the newly discovered “spherical
structures” (below, right) are shown. Mean ⫾ SEM; *p ⬍ 0.05 versus day 0; #p ⬍ 0.05 versus periphery.
64
Volume 126, Number 1 • Angiogenic Transformation in Skin Grafts
Immunohistochemistry
Analysis of the expression of the angiogenesis
factors Ang-1, Flk-1, Flt-1, and bFGF within the Fig. 4. The spherical structures originated from the graft capillaries
vascular walls of the wound bed and the graft starting at day 3 after reperfusion and continued to grow larger in
exhibited an up-regulation of all molecules at day diameter (above). The structures appeared to contain cellular mate-
5, underscoring the angiogenic process that was rial, were up to seven times wider than normal capillaries, and pre-
seen using intravital microscopy (Fig. 5). sented slow but maintained blood flow (center and below).
Staining of the endothelium and pericytes
with CD31 and desmin in thick cryosections and
subsequent evaluation by confocal microscopy re- Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy
vealed that both molecules were present within Light microscopy showed large wound bed ves-
the vascular wall of the spherical structures within sels that could be identified because of their dark
the graft at day 5 (Fig. 6). blue color, whereas the smaller capillaries ap-
65
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • July 2010
Fig. 5. Histologic evaluation of the expression of angiogenic factors within the wound bed and the skin graft revealed the
up-regulation of Ang-1 (above, left), the VEGF receptors Flt-1 (above, right ) and Flk-1 (below, left), and bFGF (below, right). DAPI
nuclear staining; original magnification, ⫻200. Goat anti–Ang-1, mouse anti–Flk-1, rabbit anti–Flt-1, and rabbit anti-bFGF were
used as primary antibodies followed by secondary staining with Texas red (above, left) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (above,
right, below, left, and below, right).
peared light blue and white. Larger magnifica- der the scanning electron microscope also stressed
tions showed the microvasculature of the skin the angiogenic transformation of the wound bed
graft itself, which could be identified because of its vessels, making reperfusion of the existing graft vas-
loop-like structures (Fig. 7, above). Vessels from culature as a consequence of the connection with
the wound bed and the typical capillaries of the newly formed bed vessels highly likely. At a greater
superficial and deep dermal plexus were inter- magnification, the connection from vessels originat-
connected. Interestingly, we also were able to ing from the wound bed to the original graft vascu-
identify the spherical structures at the capillary lature was seen (Fig. 7, below).
divisions of the graft vasculature with this method.
Evaluation by scanning electron microscopy DISCUSSION
made the two different natures of the vascular The vascularization of tissues is a well-known
beds even more clear: on the one hand, the wound aspect in plastic surgery.15–17 Tissue engineering as a
bed vessels with angiogenic transformation; on the therapeutic approach to regenerate lost or diseased
other hand, the graft vascular plexus in a more su- tissues by means of delivery of cells, constructs, and
perficial plane (Fig. 7, center). The graft intrinsic biomolecules is assumed to demand a functional
vascular dermal plexus appeared to be preserved as vascular network for adequate integration.3,18,19 This
well in this technique. The high magnification un- is the reason why the physiologic process of revas-
66
Volume 126, Number 1 • Angiogenic Transformation in Skin Grafts
67
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • July 2010
68
Volume 126, Number 1 • Angiogenic Transformation in Skin Grafts
The clarification of these mechanisms to apply ization of skin grafts in vivo: The role of angiogenesis. Plast
them onto the more complex process of the re- Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1669–1680.
7. Goretsky MJ, Breeden M, Pisarski G, Harriger MD, Boyce ST,
vascularization of skin substitutes or preengi- Greenhalgh DG. Capillary morphogenesis during healing of
neered biomaterials should be addressed in fur- full-thickness skin grafts: An ultrastructural study. Wound
ther studies using modern in vivo models. Repair Regen. 1995;3:213–220.
8. Okada T. Revascularization of free full thickness skin grafts
in rabbits: A scanning electron microscope study of micro-
CONCLUSIONS vascular casts. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39:183–189.
Applying a newly developed in vivo model to 9. Young DM, Greulich KM, Weier HG. Species-specific in situ
visualize skin graft revascularization, we were able hybridization with fluorochrome-labeled DNA probes to
to show for the first time a temporary angiogenic study vascularization of human skin grafts on athymic mice.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17:305–310.
response within the capillaries of the skin graft 10. Laschke MW, Vollmar B, Menger MD. Inosculation: Con-
between days 3 and 8 after transplantation starting necting the life-sustaining pipelines. Tissue Eng Part B Rev.
in the center of the graft. Immunohistochemistry 2009;15:455–465.
revealed the existence of endothelial cells and 11. Henry LD, Marshall DC, Friedman EA, Goldstein DP, Dam-
pericytes within the temporary angiogenic buds. min GJ. A histologic study of the human skin autograft. Am
J Pathol. 1961;39:317–332.
This most likely represents a reaction to reperfu-
12. Capla JM, Ceradini DJ, Tepper OM, et al. Skin graft vascu-
sion, implying the supply of angiogenic factors to larization involves precisely regulated regression and re-
the hypoxic skin graft. In addition, corrosion cast- placement of endothelial cells through both angiogenesis
ing supported the theory of angiogenesis within and vasculogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:836–844.
the wound bed and subsequent connection to the 13. O’Ceallaigh S, Herrick SE, Bluff JE, McGrouther DA, Fer-
existing vascular network within the skin graft. guson MW. Quantification of total and perfused blood ves-
sels in murine skin autografts using a fluorescent double-
Further studies to investigate the exact mecha- labeling technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:140–151.
nism of vessel connection and the development of 14. Krucker T, Lang A, Meyer EP. New polyurethane-based mate-
the graft vasculature are in progress. rial for vascular corrosion casting with improved physical and
imaging characteristics. Microsc Res Tech. 2006;69:138–147.
Nicole Lindenblatt, M.D. 15. Garrè C. Über die histologischen Vorgänge bei der Anhei-
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery lung der Thierschen Transplantationen. Beitr Klin Chir. 1888;
University Hospital Zurich 4:395.
Ramistraße 100 16. Hübscher C. Beiträge Hautverpflanzung nach Thiersch. Zen-
8091 Zurich, Switzerland tralbl All Pathol. 1890;505:1.
[email protected] 17. Goldmann EE. Die künstliche Überhäutung offener Krebse
durch Hauttransplantationen nach Thiersch. Beitr Klein Chir.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1890;4:395.
18. Shepherd BR, Enis DR, Wang F, Suarez Y, Pober JS, Schech-
The authors thank Kerstin Abshagen and Dorothea ner JS. Vascularization and engraftment of a human skin
Frenz, Institute for Experimental Surgery, University of substitute using circulating progenitor cell-derived endothe-
Rostock, Rostock, Germany; Eric P. Meyer, Institute of lial cells. FASEB J. 2006;20:1739–1741.
Zoology; Martha Bain, Department of Visceral and 19. Tremblay PL, Hudon V, Berthod F, Germain L, Auger FA.
Transplantation Surgery; and Klaus Marquardt, Cen- Inosculation of tissue engineered capillaries with the host’s
vasculature in a reconstructed skin transplanted on mice.
ter for Microscopy and Image Analysis (all from the
Am J Transplant. 2005;5:1002–1010.
University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland) for their ex- 20. Gerhardt H, Betsholtz C. Endothelial-pericyte interactions in
cellent technical assistance. angiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2003;314:15–23.
21. Zarem HA. Development of the microcirculation in full
REFERENCES thickness autogenous skin grafts in mice. Surg Forum 1965;
1. Reverdin JL. Greffe epidermique. Bull Soc Imperiale Chir Paris 16:469–470.
1869;14:493. 22. O’Ceallaigh S, Herrick SE, Bennett WR, Bluff JE, Ferguson
2. Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MW. Bioengineering skin using MW, McGrouther DA. Perivascular cells in a skin graft are
mechanisms of regeneration and repair. Biomaterials 2007; rapidly repopulated by host cells. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
28:5100–5113. 2007;60:864–875.
3. Williams DF. To engineer is to create: The link between engi- 23. Demarchez M, Hartmann DJ, Prunieras M. An immunohis-
neering and regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24:4–8. tological study of the revascularization process in human skin
4. Black AF, Berthod F, L’heureux N, Germain L, Auger FA. In transplanted onto the nude mouse. Transplantation 1987;43:
vitro reconstruction of a human capillary-like network in a 896–903.
tissue-engineered skin equivalent. FASEB J. 1998;12:1331– 24. Shepherd BR, Chen HY, Smith CM, Gruionu G, Williams SK,
1340. Hoying JB. Rapid perfusion and network remodeling in a
5. Lokmic Z, Mitchell GM. Engineering the microcirculation. microvascular construct after implantation. Arterioscler
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2008;14:87–103. Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:898–904.
6. Lindenblatt N, Calcagni M, Contaldo C, Menger MD, Gio- 25. Laschke MW, Rücker M, Jensen G, et al. Improvement of
vanoli P, Vollmar B. A new model to study the revascular- vascularization of PLGA scaffolds by inosculation of in situ-
69
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • July 2010
preformed functional blood vessels with the host microvas- 33. Nehls V, Denzer K, Drenckhahn D. Pericyte involvement in
culature. Ann Surg. 2008;248:939–948. capillary sprouting during angiogenesis in situ. Cell Tissue Res.
26. Semenza GL. Angiogenesis in ischemic and neoplastic dis- 1992;270:469–674.
orders. Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:17–28. 34. Wesseling P, Schlingemann RO, Rietveld FJ, Link M, Burger
27. Risau W. Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature 1997;386: PC, Ruiter DJ. Early and extensive contribution of pericytes/
671–674. vascular smooth muscle cells to microvascular proliferation
28. Patan S. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Cancer Treat Res. in glioblastoma multiforme: An immuno-light and immuno-
2004;117:3–32. electron microscopic study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1995;
29. Allt G, Lawrenson JG. Pericytes: Cell biology and pathology. 54:304–310.
Cells Tissues Organs 2001;169:1–11. 35. Amselgruber WM, Schäfer M, Sinowatz F. Angiogenesis in
30. Sims DE. The pericyte: A review. Tissue Cell 1986;18:153–174. the bovine corpus luteum: An immunocytochemical and
31. Blood CH, Zetter BR. Tumor interactions with the vascula- ultrastructural study. Anat Histol Embryol. 1999;28:157–166.
ture: Angiogenesis and tumor metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta 36. Reynolds LP, Grazul-Bilska AT, Redmer DA. Angiogenesis in
1990;1032:89–118. the corpus luteum. Endocrine 2000;12:1–9.
32. Morikawa S, Baluk P, Kaidoh T, Haskell A, Jain RK, Mc- 37. Kuwano M, Fukushi J, Okamoto M, et al. Angiogenesis fac-
Donald DM. Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels tors. Intern Med. 2001;40:565–572.
and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am J Pathol. 2002;160: 38. Karamysheva AF. Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Biochemistry
985–1000. (Mosc.) 2008;73:751–762.
70