High School Arms Proliferation Disec PDF
High School Arms Proliferation Disec PDF
High School Arms Proliferation Disec PDF
The First Committee deals with disarmament, global challenges and threats to peace that affect
the international community and seeks out solutions to the challenges in the international
security regime.
It considers all disarmament and international security matters within the scope of the UN
Charter or relating to the powers and functions of any other organ of the United Nations; the
general principles of cooperation in the maintenance of international peace and security, as well
as principles governing disarmament and the regulation of armaments; promotion of cooperative
arrangements and measures aimed at strengthening stability through lower levels of armaments.
The Committee works in close cooperation with the United Nations Disarmament
Commission and the Geneva-based Conference on Disarmament. It is the only Main
Committee of the General Assembly entitled to verbatim records coverage.1
The Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) is the First Committee of
the United Nations General Assembly (GA). It includes all nations that are United Nations
Member States. DISEC deals with issues regarding the promotion, establishment, and subsequent
maintenance of global peace while simultaneously working to prevent weapons proliferation.
Under the UN Charter, all member states and observers of the United Nations are automatically
part of the first committee of the General Assembly, and have an equal vote. Documents drafted
by this committee require a simple majority to be passed. Like the other committees of the
United Nations General Assembly, DISEC is unable to impose sanctions, authorize armed
intervention, or pass binding resolutions.4 With the increase of weapons and growing security
1
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
threats, DISEC continues to grow in importance and becomes a significant part of resolving
international crises.
In summary, DISEC cannot require that countries take a specific action. However, the committee
can make recommendations to the Security Council about what should be done on a specific
issue.3
In 1952, the General Assembly, by its resolution 502 (VI) of January 1952, created the United
Nations Disarmament Commission (UNDC) under the Security Council with a general mandate
on disarmament questions. However, it met only occasionally after 1959.
In 1978 the first special session of the General Assembly devoted to disarmament established a
successor Disarmament Commission (UNDC) as a subsidiary organ of the Assembly, composed
of all Member States of the United Nations. It was created as a deliberative body, with the
function of considering and making recommendations on various issues in the field of
disarmament and of following up on the relevant decisions and recommendations of the special
session, it reports annually to the General Assembly. 2
The end of the First World War in 1918 saw the inception of a number of naval conferences with
a stated aim to work towards disarmament. In the 1920s, the worldwide mood strongly favored
disarmament, and the Washington Naval Conference of 1921 stands out as a successful example
of modern-day international agreement to limit the use and proliferation of a certain type of
armament. Some of the most powerful nations of the day, including Britain, France, Italy, Japan,
and the United States, agreed to impose restrictions on the tonnage of warships and institute a
full moratorium on new naval construction. In 1925, the Second Geneva Convention called for
a complete ban on the use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare.5
The decades following the end of the Second World War saw a boom in treaties seeking to
reduce the proliferation of broad categories of destructive weapons. The newly created United
Nations provided a venue for hundreds of nations to create, discuss, and ultimately sign the
nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1968, while the United States and the Soviet Union
worked bilaterally to sign and ratify the first Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty.6
Though global arms control efforts have tended to focus on traditional “weapons of mass
destruction,” recent years have seen an expansion in the categories of weapons targeted by
international treaties. In the past fifteen years, the international dialogue on arms control has
finally begun to focus on small arms. A number of regional initiatives has helped set the stage for
broader UN action to regulate trade and transfer in small arms, including the 1197 Organization
2
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
of American States Arms Convention, and a 2000 document on small arms produced by the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).7
In 2001, the UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons was held in
New York. The meeting resulted in a non-binding Programme of Action to guide further
dialogue on the issue.8
Nuclear Weapons:
Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on earth. One can destroy a whole city,
potentially killing millions, and jeopardizing the natural environment and lives of future
generations through its long-term catastrophic effects. The dangers from such weapons arise
from their very existence. Although nuclear weapons have only been used twice in warfare—in
the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945—about 22,000 reportedly remain in our world
today and there have been over 2,000 nuclear tests conducted to date. Disarmament is the best
protection against such dangers, but achieving this goal has been a tremendously difficult
challenge.
The United Nations has sought to eliminate such weapons ever since its establishment. The first
resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1946 established a Commission to deal with
problems related to the discovery of atomic energy among others. The Commission was to make
proposals for, inter alia, the control of atomic energy to the extent necessary to ensure its use
only for peaceful purposes. The resolution also decided that the Commission should make
proposals for "the elimination from national armaments of atomic weapons and of all other major
weapons adaptable to mass destruction."
3
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
A number of multilateral treaties have since been established with the aim of preventing nuclear
proliferation and testing, while promoting progress in nuclear disarmament. These include
the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Treaty Banning Nuclear
Weapon Tests In The Atmosphere, In Outer Space And Under Water, also known as the Partial
Test Ban Treaty (PTBT), and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), which
was signed in 1996 but has yet to enter into force. 9
The NPT is a landmark international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear
weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear
energy, and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete
disarmament. The Treaty represents the only binding commitment in a multilateral treaty to the
goal of disarmament by the nuclear-weapon States. Opened for signature in 1968, the Treaty
entered into force in 1970. On 11 May 1995, the Treaty was extended indefinitely. A total of
190 parties have joined the Treaty, including the five nuclear-weapon States. More countries
have ratified the NPT than any other arms limitation and disarmament agreement, a testament to
the Treaty's significance.
The provisions of the Treaty, particularly article VIII, paragraph 3, envisage a review of the
operation of the Treaty every five years, a provision which was reaffirmed by the States parties
at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference.
The 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear
Weapons (NPT) met at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 3 to 28 May 2010. A
total of 172 States parties to the Treaty participated in the Conference. States parties agreed to a
final document which included a review of the operation of the Treaty, reflecting the views of
the President of the Conference, as well as agreed conclusions and recommendations for follow-
on actions. The action plan contains measures to advance nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-
proliferation, the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and regional issues, including the
implementation of the 1995 Resolution on the Middle East. 10
4
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones:
...any zone recognized as such by the General Assembly of the United Nations, which any group
of States, in the free exercises of their sovereignty, has established by virtue of a treaty or
convention whereby:
(a) The statute of total absence of nuclear weapons to which the zone shall be subject,
including the procedure for the delimitation of the zone, is defined;
(b) An international system of verification and control is established to guarantee compliance
with the obligations deriving from that statute. 11
The UN Disarmament Commission in its report of April 30, 1999, recommended a set of
principles and guidelines for the establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone, which included,
inter alia:
5
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
Current situation—Facts:
- Ban Ki-moon
Big-ticket weapons such as ICBMs may seem vastly threatening than AK-47s and grenade
launchers, and certainly have a place in the UN’s security agenda, but the truth of the matter is
that small arms do far more damage around the world on a day-to-day level. In the words of the
Small Arms Working Group, “there are around forty wars raging in countries around the world
today. These wars are being fought primarily with small arms and light weapons carried by
individual soldiers or on light vehicles.” On average, over 400,000 people are killed every year
through small arms, both in conflict zones and in crime-ridden areas of cities around the world,
and that number is bound to increase—conservative estimates indicate that eight million more
small arms are produced by year, along with 16 billion units of ammunition, more than two new
bullets for every man, woman and child on the planet. In 2005, then-current estimates pegged the
number of extant small arms worldwide at 550 million—as of 2011, that number is closer to 90
million.13
The distribution of small arms-related casualties matters as well. Over 90% of civilian casualties
in conflict zones are caused by small arms, and these firearms are undoubtedly the major cause
of non-combatant deaths in conflicts around the world. More than any other weapon in modern
warfare, small arms are consistently utilized to target and terrorize non-combatants.14
6
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
Questions to Consider
1. What is the difference between non-proliferation and disarmament?
2. Why do some member states within the UN favor non-proliferation and others
disarmament?
3. Do people need weapons for self-defense? Does enforcing disarmament pose a threat to
national sovereignty?
4. Is total disarmament possible?
5. Should the NPT be revised? What provisions should be made?
6. Is it time for complete, global, nuclear disarmament? Why or why not?
7. What is the distinguishing factor between peaceful energy processing and warhead
buildup?
8. What are guidelines to prevent buildup?
9. Are all countries equal in regard to nuclear technology?
10. Why do some people refer to small arms as weapons of mass destruction? What can
the committee take away from previous UN action (or attempts at action) on the
proliferation of small arms and light weapons?
7
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
8
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota
United Nations General Assembly: Arms Proliferation
UNA-MN Model UN Conference at Macalester College — November 2014
References:
9
Copyright © 2014 by the United Nations Association of Minnesota