Control Monitoring and Testing

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15
At a glance
Powered by AI
The presentation discusses an integrated framework for control environment, quality assurance, and operational risk management oversight. It focuses on first line of defense control monitoring and testing.

The integrated framework overview discusses assessing risk, documenting controls, managing change, monitoring/self-assessing controls, and executing independent quality assurance programs. It includes the control environment framework and quality assurance framework.

ORM oversight roles are responsible for providing credible challenge for first line of defense procedures and governance, reviewing control inventory data quality, facilitating risk identification, and approving annual QA plans. They also periodically review framework adherence and aggregate/report QA results.

Control Monitoring

and Testing

April 2017

Presented by: Matt Duditch – SVP,


Operational Risk Management
US Bank
Topics
• Integrated Framework Overview
o Control Environment Framework
o Quality Assurance Framework
• ORM Oversight Roles and Responsibilities
• Lessons Learned
• Control Monitoring Reporting Examples

Presentation with focus on First Line of


Defense Control Monitoring and Testing
U.S. BANCORP | 2
Integrated Framework Overview

Monitor/ Execute
Assess Risk Document Manage
Self-Assess Independent
(e.g. RCSA) Controls Change
Controls QA

Risk and Control Environment Quality


Compliance Framework (Control Assurance
Programs Environment Policy) Framework
(QA Policy)
U.S. BANCORP | 3
Control Environment Framework
• Align per risk • Drives
assessments, auditability,
leverage consistency of
central practice
repository
Evidence
Document
the Control
the Control in
in Business
the Control
Practice and
Inventory
Procedures

Monitor the
Escalate
Control to
Findings and
Confirm
Manage
Accuracy and
Change
Performance
• Control • Leverage self-
Governance assessments,
and issue self- attestations for
identification SOX, RCSA

Governance and Oversight


U.S. BANCORP | 4
Quality Assurance Framework
• Ensure QA of • Review
controls process/
mitigating all procedures/
material risks controls
• Document • Confirm test
planned QA attributes
by quarter Annual
Test Prep
Planning

Issue ID
Test
and
Execution
Reporting
• Vet findings & • Perform QA
identify issues testing
• Report results, • Review KIs
and remediate • Note findings
findings
Governance and Oversight
U.S. BANCORP | 5
ORM Oversight Roles and
Responsibilities
Control
RCSA Program Environment Quality Assurance
Framework Framework
Policy Ownership/Oversight/Procedure Review/Training

Maintain Routines, Tools, Templates, and Guidance

• Facilitate risk • Provide credible • Approve annual QA


identification and challenge for FLOD plans and material
scenario analysis Procedures and deviations
• Provide credible Governance • Periodic review of
challenge over • Review and framework adherence
control identification, recommend actions • Aggregate and report
inherent/residual risk related to control quarterly QA results
ratings and inventory data quality
• Lead coordinated
effectiveness ratings
remediation efforts
U.S. BANCORP | 6
Lessons Learned
• Early involvement with risk assessment and program owners

• Change mindset that control owners are responsible for


monitoring and cannot only rely on independent QA and Audit

• Implement framework for outsourced control


execution/reliance on other Business Lines or Support
Functions
• Assert central repository for controls, build with robust
governance and change management in mind
• Strive for systematic QA planning and results capture early in
the implementation cycle
• Fully assess scoping levers for QA (see next slide)
U.S. BANCORP | 7
QA Scoping Levers
Scoping of Risk Cutoff for testing per the inherent risk scale,
degree of regulatory applicability
Scoping of Controls Automated vs. IT Dependent vs. Manual,
Primary vs. Secondary
Program-Specific e.g. SOX, Basel, AML – specific prioritization
Levers lens or level of scrutiny
Maturity of Control Only physical evidence of control (onsite testing
Design required) vs. systematic reporting, alignment of
controls to key business objectives
Maturity of Control Depth, frequency, and reliability of control
Monitoring owner monitoring
Frequency of testing Weekly, monthly, quarterly, annually, etc.
Style of testing Frequent sample-based vs. “internal audit” style

U.S. BANCORP | 8
Control Monitoring and Testing
Reporting Examples

1) RCSA Driven Control Self-Assessment


Results

2) Quality Assurance Results


U.S. BANCORP | 9
RCSA Control Effectiveness
Self-Assessment - Illustration

U.S. BANCORP | 10
RCSA Control Effectiveness
Self-Assessment Reporting
• Trend reporting of all less than satisfactory controls
• Require formal remediation plan for each instance
and validation by Operational Risk Management

U.S. BANCORP | 11
Quality Assurance Reporting
Elements

Control
Control QA
QA Plan Finding /
Testing Originated
Adherence Failure
Profiling Issues
Rates

Thematic Analysis

U.S. BANCORP | 12
QA Control Failure/Finding Rate
Failure / Finding Rate by Risk Category
Risk Categories Control Failure Rate Control Finding Rate

Risk Segment 1 1% 5%
Risk Segment 2 3% 4%
Risk Segment 3 0% 0%
Risk Segment 4 0% 0%
Risk Segment 5 0% 0%
Risk Segment 6 6% 13%
Risk Segment 7 0% 20%
Risk Segment 8 2% 50%
Risk Segment 9 0% 0%
Risk Segment 10 7% 11%
Enterprise 2% 6%

Also report by Business Line matrixed with Risk Segment, etc.


U.S. BANCORP | 13
QA Finding Thematic Analysis
Themes Identified in Findings by Risk Category
Percent
Themes Identified Risk 1 Risk 2 Risk 3 Risk … Total
age
Execution Evidence 4 3 7 41%
eGRC Control Inventory
0 0%
Documentation
Procedure Gap 1 1 6%
Policy Non-compliance 1 1 6%
Failed Execution /
1 1 1 1 4 24%
Human Error
Process or Control
1 1 2 4 24%
Design Failure
Total 5 4 2 3 17 100%

Documentation Findings Control Failures


U.S. BANCORP | 14
QA Issue Reporting
Business # %
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Line Q over Q Q over Q
BL 1 5 5 5 5 5 0 0%
BL 2 10 10 10 10 15 5 50%
BL 3 0 0 6 6 3 (3) (50%)
BL4 4 5 8 8 10 2 25%
Total 19 20 29 29 33 4 14%
Areas of Heightened Focus
Past Due 0
Extensions 1
Re-opened 1
At Risk 2
Aged > 24 Months 1
Due Within 60 Days 5

Do more sub-segment reporting by risk category, theme, etc.


U.S. BANCORP | 15

You might also like