Perfomance Management
Perfomance Management
Perfomance Management
Performance Management
is NOT
performance appraisal
Supervisors must conduct at least four performance management activities with employees:
• Managers/supervisors should have initial expectation and goal-setting conversations with each of their new employees
within 30 days of their start date, and annually after that. These discussions should cover the major duties of the
employee’s position, work priorities, and how performance will be evaluated.
• Managers/supervisors should regularly engage in informal conversations with their employees about the
duties, expectations and performance.
• Managers/supervisors should conduct a feedback and coaching conversation approximately midway through
a new employee’s probationary period and midway through each performance year after that.
• All managers/supervisors should conduct summary performance evaluations with their employees at the
conclusion of each new employee’s probationary period and at the end of each performance year after that.
Contributions of Performance
Management for organization/HR function
For organization
Emerging biases
Reward System
Returns and their Degrees of Dependency on the Performance Management System
Low dependency
Income Protection
Moderate dependency
Work/Life Focus
Allowances
Relational Returns
Base Pay
High dependency
Contingent Pay
Short-term Incentives
Long-term Incentives
Purposes of PM Systems
Strategic
Administrative
Informational
Developmental
Organizational maintenance
Documentational
Strategic:
Administrative:
Salary adjustments
Promotions
Retention or termination
Informational:
Communicate to employees:
Developmental:
Performance feedback/coaching
Organizational maintenance:
Documentation:
14 Characteristics
2. Thorough
3. Practical
4. Meaningful
5. Specific
7. Reliable
8. Valid
10. Inclusive
12. Correctable
13. Standardized
14. Ethical
Congruent with organizational strategy: Consistent with organization strategy and goals.
Thorough: All employees and job responsibilities are evaluated and feedback is given on both positive
and negative performance.
Meaningful: Standards are important and relevant, Results have consequences, Evaluations occur
regularly and at appropriate times.
Inclusive: represents concerns of all involved, when system created employees help with deciding, what
should be measure and how it should be measured?
Open (no secrets): communications are factual and honest, on-going evaluation and feedback, 2-way
communication in appraisal meeting.
• Workforce planning
Higher Management
Self-Appraisals
Peers (Co-Workers)
Evaluation Teams
Customers
“360° Appraisals”
Supervisor: Performance appraisal done by an employee’s manager and often reviewed by a manager
one level higher.
Team Appraisal: Based on Total Quality management (team accomplishment rather than individual).
Punitive Implications
Control Relinquishment
Stereotypes
Evaluation Scales
• Force A Curve
• Performance-rating error in which the appraiser tends to give employees either unusually
high or unusually low ratings.
Central Tendency
Recency Error
• Performance-rating error in which the appraisal is based largely on the employee’s most
recent behavior rather than on behavior throughout the appraisal period.
Similar to me Error
1. Explain Objectives
1. Schedule the review and inform the employee two weeks in advance.
2. Ask the employee to prepare for the session by reviewing his performance, job objectives,
and development goals.
3. Clearly state that this will be the formal annual performance appraisal.
Appraisal Interviews
Schedule the interview 10 to 14 days in advance. Provide subordinates with a “guide” to follow.
• Tell-and-sell method
• Tell-and-listen method
Discuss problems, needs, innovations, satisfactions and dissatisfactions since last review.
Appraisal Methods
Rating Scales ( most popular )
Essay
Management by Objectives
Ranking of Employees
Choose from statements designed to distinguish between successful and unsuccessful performance.
Essay Method:
Rates performance on the basis of employee achievement of goals set by mutual agreement of
employee and manager.
Procedural Guidelines
Sally is a sales manager at a large pharmaceutical company. The fiscal year will end in
one week. She is overwhelmed with end-of-the year tasks including reviewing the
budget she is likely to get for next year, responding to phone calls of customers, and
supervising a group of 10 salespeople. It’s a very hectic time, probably the most hectic
time of the year.
She receives a phone call from the HR Department: ‘Sally, we have not received your
performance reviews for your 10 employees; they are due by the end of the fiscal
year.’ Sally thinks ‘Oh, those performance reviews… What a waste of my time!’
From Sally’s point of view, there is no value in filling out those meaningless forms. She
does not see her subordinates in action because they are in the field visiting
customers most of the time. All she knows about their performance is based on sales
figures, which depend more on the products offered and geographic territory covered
than the effort and motivation of each salesperson
And nothing happens in terms of rewards regardless of her ratings. These are lean
times in her organization, and salary adjustments are based on seniority rather than
merit. She has less than 3 days to turn in her forms. What is she going to do?
She decides to go down the path of least resistance: to please her employees, she gives
everyone the maximum possible rating.
In this way, she believes they will be happy with their ratings and Sally will not have to
deal with complaints or follow ups meetings.
Sally fills out the forms in less than 20 minutes and gets back to her ‘real job’.
Learning objectives