Scribd
Upload
56 views

101 Conclusion

1. Researchers concluded that the light tube griller grilled food faster than charcoal, taking an average of 16.22 minutes. It also produced tastier and glossier grilled food based on participant ratings. 2. Testing showed the light tube griller performed best in the first trial, though the third trial using charcoal took the longest time. 3. An independent t-test found a significant difference in grilling times between the three trials using the light tube griller.

Uploaded by

Annah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views

101 Conclusion

1. Researchers concluded that the light tube griller grilled food faster than charcoal, taking an average of 16.22 minutes. It also produced tastier and glossier grilled food based on participant ratings. 2. Testing showed the light tube griller performed best in the first trial, though the third trial using charcoal took the longest time. 3. An independent t-test found a significant difference in grilling times between the three trials using the light tube griller.

Uploaded by

Annah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Conclusion

Based on the summary of findings, the following conclusions were drawn:

1. The Researchers conclude that the too hot to resist: light tube griller in terms of the

length of time has the aggregate mean estimation of 16.22 and the exploratory item is

quicker in terms of time in grilling foods.

2. The Researcher concludes that the quantitative information of too hot to resist: light tube

griller in terms of quality of grilled food has the overall mean value of 3.57, obtained and

is categorized by the data showed that the too hot to resist: light tube griller is tastier and

glossier.

3. The length of the too hot to resist: light tube grill which coincides the three different trials

that the first trial has a greater mean value than the other two trials but the length of time

of charcoal the third trial has the great value of mean.

4. The Independent T-test result concluded that there is a significance difference on the

effect of the three trial of too hot to resist: light tube in terms of the length of time.
Recommendation

Based on the strength of the summary of findings and light of the conclusions, the

following recommendations were drawn:

1. Department of Science and Technology should conduct more study about grilling in a

safe from any harmful diseases and eco-friendly to the environment.

2. Findings of the study should be presented to the government agencies like Department

of Health and Department of Science and Technology to lessen the worry of people in

eating grilled foods.

3. Future researcher are encouraged to conduct a comparative study that can improve this

study to make our world more safety and eco- friendly.

You might also like