Nanotechnology in Oil and Gas PDF
Nanotechnology in Oil and Gas PDF
Nanotechnology in Oil and Gas PDF
Abstract: This paper presents a review on the application of nanotechnology for enhancing oil recovery in oil
and gas industry. Different types of nanoparticles; metallic, metal oxide, inorganic organic and magnetic
nanoparticles has been reviewed. Application of nanotechnology in oil and gas industry has been revised in
enhanced oil recovery, corrosion and scale inhibition, drilling and hydraulic fracturing fluids, exploration and
reservoir characterization, reservoir cementing, production and stimulation. Challenges and current research
gaps; cost ineffective route for synthesis and delivery of nanoparticle, mechanism for migration and transport
behaviour of nanomaterials through a porous media, determination of size of nanomaterials to secure effective
penetration into porous reservoir and agglomeration of nanoparticles in a coarse and harsh conditions of sub-
surfaces were also discussed.
Key words: Nanotechnology, Nanoparticle, Oil and Gas, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Heavy Oil Recovery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Date of Submission: 22-02-2019 Date of acceptance: 08-03-2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
I. Introduction
In oil and gas industry, it is projected that in about 30 years’ time, the global energy demand must have
risen as high as 60%. This challenge can only be met through energy science revolutionary breakthrough and
advanced technologies (Campeloet al., 2009). Oil and gas industries has been in search of a striking
technological discovery in the underlying core science and engineering. The current insight in nanotechnology
has opened up the possibilities of going beyond the energy supply alternatives through the introduction of
technologies that are environmentally friendly and super-efficient. Nanotechnology is characterized by the use
of materials in designs and production at the nanometer (nm) scale. Its design is in collaboration among several
disciplines which makes it inseparably innovative and very concise compared to other technologies.
Nanotechnology has been projected to be the groundwork and cornerstone of any future energy technology,
which could offer the greatest possibility for innovative solutions (Subbiahet al., 2010 and Serrano et al., 2009).
Nanotechnology involves the use of nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanofluids/smart fluid, nanoemulsion
and nanocatalyst which is in the range of 1-100nm (Fakoyaet al., 2018) for wettability alterations, mobility
control, enhancing steam injection, well completion, modification of interfacial parameters by nanostructured
surfactants in enhanced oil recovery process, enhancing abrasion and corrosion resistant by nanostructured
coatings, improvement in precision and sensitivity in sensors during exploration, strengthening and increasing
durability in oil well cements, separation by nanostructured membranes during oil production, adsorption by
nanoparticles in asphathene removal, nanoparticles for scale inhibition during scale formation control and in
well completion through nanocoatings. It also involves the synthesis and utilization of nanoparticles, nanotubes,
nanofilms and nanofibers (Xu et al., 2015).
The application and advanced study of these small materials between 1-100nm is currently one the
fastest growing research area in in engineering and science at large because of they are ecosystem friendly. The
innovation and Nano-technological development has led researchers to fabricate collection of different unique
and enhanced nanodevices, nanotools and nanomaterials which can be used in various areas including
electronics, medicals, biomedical, aerospace, photography, energy, smart materials, manufacturing and
pharmaceutical (Alshehriet al., 2012; Shen et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015; Subbiahet al., 2010;
Serrano et al., 2009; Moutet al., 2012; You et al., 2013; De Jong and Borm, 2008 and Otsuka et al., 2003). This
is because their physical and chemical properties are size-dependent which are not often observable in their bulk
counterparts (Kim et al.,2014). The number of atoms at the surface of a bulk material is always smaller than the
number of atoms in the bulk.
Therefore, their physical and chemical properties are mostly constant regardless of their sizes.
The reduction of the size of a particle to a wavelength less or near its electron conduction, many
properties and features such as optical behaviour, magnetism, thermal resistance, melting point, internal
pressure, chemical and catalytic activities are altered. This is due to the surface to volume ratio which
exponentially becomes larger and the number of atoms on the surface also becomes appreciable with regards to
the amount of atoms in the bulk solution (Saiduret al., 2011). This idea has allowed researchers to utilize these
unique properties for many different applications. Also, nanotechnology is a cost-effective, cost-efficient
industrial process and offers a precise design and manipulation of atoms and molecules as well the as full
control on their unique properties (Serrano et al., 2009).
However, the high global demand for energy and the remaining major challenges in the application of
current conventional procedures have forced researchers to embark on the search for more economical, efficient
and environmentally sound techniques to extract more hydrocarbons. In refinery processes, the drilling
platforms and equipment are made so as to resist corrosion towards water and air, resist shock and wear,
enhanced durability and thermal conductivity. This is carried out by coating them with different nanoparticles
(Saiduret al., 2011).
Different types of nanoparticles exist in nanotechnology, these are generally classified as quantum dots,
graphene, carbon nanotubes, fullerene, polymeric particles, metal oxides and metallic (Kapustaet al., 2011).
Generally, there are four types of nanoparticles; (a)Organic nanoparticle (b)Metallic and metal oxides
nanoparticles (c)Inorganic nanoparticle (d)Magnetic nanoparticles (Neginet al., 2016; Khalil et al., 2017).
Generally, there are four most common methods through which metallic nanoparticle can be synthesized;
a. Reduction of metal salt precursors
b. Reduction of organic ligands in organometallic precursors
c. Metal vapour chemistry
d. Electrochemical synthesis (Pachón and Rothenberg, 2008; Kapustaet al., 2011).
fabrication process. Silver, Copper, Osmium, Palladium, Platinum, Gold, Iridium and Rhodium metallic
nanoparticles have been synthesized using reduction of each metal salt precursor in the presence of a stabilizing
agents to prevent particle aggregation (Ayyapanet al., 1997; Jana et al., 2001; Sanyal and Jagirdar, 2012 and
Wostek-Wokciechowskaet al., 2005). The general scheme for this fabrication process is represented in figure
2(Khalil et al., 2017; Pachón and Rothenberg, 2008).
Generally, the metal cation contained in the solution with the help of a reducing agents such as
hydrazine, carbon monoxide, hydrogen and hydrides are reduced to metal atoms. The formation of the
nanoparticle is a stepwise reaction process which involves nucleation, growth and agglomeration (Murphy et al.,
2005; Roucouxet al., 2002 and Rodríguez-León et al., 2013). The rapid clustering of the metallic atoms leads to
the formation of nuclei of metallic nanoparticle which are also referred to as seed particles. The seed particles
grow together to form very stable and larger metallic nanoparticles as a by-product. The addition of stabilizing
agents such as surfactants, organic ligands and polymers at this stage controls the growth and aggregation of the
particle, this also controls the shape and morphology of the nanoparticles formed (Pachónet al., 2008).
Fig. 2; Metal salt reduction process-the most commonly used technique for fabricating metallic nanoparticles
(Khalil et al., 2017) from (Fakoyaet al., 2018).
The stabilizing agent has the ability to change the surface energy of particles and alter the growth and
aggregation level at the metal surface. Through this process, nanoparticles having different properties in
different directions; thus non-isotropic such as nanocube, nanowires, nanoplates, and nanorods can be
synthesized depending on the type and amount of stabilizing agent (Yang et al., 2010; Lofton and Sigmund,
2005 and Huang et al., 2011).
1.6 General scope from the evolution of nanotechnology in oil and gas industry
The evolution of nanotechnology has cut across many sections of oil and gas industry and currently
acting as a technology enhancing a quantum leap in the industry. These sections ranges from every unit
operation of petroleum geology, oil well completion and cementing, drilling processes, refining, production and
stimulation and other production processes. Through the impulse of ideas and innovations in the field of
nanotechnology, oil and gas industry will receive high boost by exposing the equipment materials to extended
work conditions. Also, the advancement of nanotechnology which is related to a very good simulation tools
enables the characterisation of interfacial processes between fluids and minerals (flow control and wettability),
giving a very good understanding of all the mechanisms for enhanced heavy oil recovery. Oil and gas industries
are heavily investing in the areas of nanotechnology for improved reliability of equipment, enhanced heavy oil
recovery, analytical emulsion characteristic, reduction in energy losses during crude oil processing and
development of products with high performance.
Figure 3: Chemical flooding method for Enhanced Oil Recovery (Ogoloet al., 2012)
According to (Yu et al., 2010b) the transport and retention properties of aqueous dispersions of
paramagnetic nanoparticles in reservoir rock were studied. Surface treated paramagnetic iron-oxide
nanoparticles at concentration of 0.1e10% wt. were considered for the core flood experiments. In the work of
(Yu et al., 2010) the transport and retention properties of nanoparticles through dolomite and sandstone cores
were investigated at high salinity condition. They considered carbon nanoparticles with/without surface
treatment, and so, the effect of surface treatment was also studied. Dolomite is known to be positively charged
owing to its large amount of divalent ions of calcium and magnesium (Ca 2+ and Mg2+), while sandstone is
negatively charged due to its predominant silica content (Yu et al., 2010).
The results of the core flood experiments (when carbon nanoparticleswithout surface treatment was
used in the presence of(KCl, Ca2+ and Mg2+ and seawater) revealed that nanoparticlesbreakthrough was delayed.
The delayed breakthrough was areflection of carbon nanoparticles retention on core surfaces, aresult that arose
from the effect of ionic strength and divalentions. It has been established in literature that a high ionicstrength
(at increased salt concentration) leads to the shrinkage of the double layer of charged particles in aqueous
suspensions, and consequently, reduces their repulsive capability (Yu et al., 2010; Tadros, 2013 and Ali et al.,
2004). The retention is greater with dolomite cores than with sandstone cores (Yu et al., 2010). This is because
of the additional attractive force that emerged between the negatively charged carbon nanoparticles and the
positively charged dolomite surface, unlike sandstone that has negatively charged surfaces. The breakthrough
values recorded with surface-treated carbon nanoparticles were relatively higher compared to the ones obtained
with untreated nanoparticles - a confirmation of minimal retention. The surface modification assisted in
shielding the carbon nanoparticles, and thus, inhibited charge interaction. This explains the reason behind the
use of surface-treated nanoparticles in most of the research reported in publications.
Figure 4: Nanoparticle structuring in the wedge-film resulting in structural disjoining pressure (Abdelrahman
Ibrahim El-Diasty, 2013)
Enhanced oil recovery is guaranteed by dispersion of nanoparticles in a suitable fluid. From the
research work of Ogoloet al., (2012) for enhanced oil recovery experiments. He used different nanoparticles
such as aluminium oxide, magnesium oxide, tin oxide, zirconium oxide, nickel oxide, tin oxide, iron oxide, zinc
oxide, hydrophobic silicon oxide and silicon oxide which was treated with silane showing enhanced recovery
and boosted hydrocarbon production. The use of these nanoparticle oxides are highly related to the variation of
rock wettability, interfacial tension reduction, oil viscosity reduction, reduction of mobility ratio and
permeability alterations. Another example in nanoparticle use (in order to improve the oil recovery efficiency)
as an additive for operations has been studied by University of Alaska Fairbanks (Rusheet, 2009) where some
researchers highlighted the important performances guaranteed by the use of metal nanoparticles dispersed into
supercritical CO2, responsible of the heavy oil viscosity reduction with consequent increasing of recovery
efficiency.
According to the research work of Rodriguez et al., (2009); sedimentary rocks with different
permeability and lithology was injected with a concentrated aqueous suspension of a surface enhanced silica
nanoparticle of about 20 wt % (D = 5nm and 20 nm). The surface-enhanced silica nanoparticles in the aqueous
suspension assembled themselves, forming a structural array at a discontinuous phase of the oil, gas or paraffin.
This caused a formation of a wedge-like structure by the particles present in these three-phases of contact
region, forcing themselves through the discontinuous phase and the substrate as shown in figure 4.
development of these fluids. In petroleum industries, most fluids used contain micro and macro sized particles.
These particles cause lots of damages to the process equipment. As described from the research work of
Amanullahet al., (2011), he explained that the developed smart fluids with a nanomaterial highly enhances the
formation of tight and thin mud cake, improving and enhancing filtration and rheological properties of the
fluids. If the quality of the drilling mud is low, it leaves thick mud cake on the wall of the well-bore which
causes increase in required force that could remove the drill-string, in case differential sticking occurred
(Outmans, 1958).
Amanullahet al., (2011) prepared water based nano-fluids with three available commercial
nanoparticles at 0.5 ppb (0.14% w/w). At the dispersing phase, the enhancement of the viscous and filtration
properties and the stability of the nanoparticle in the fluids, were maintained through the addition of a tri-
functional additive and a vis-cosifier. For comparison, a sample of bentonite mud was prepared having a micro-
sized particle. The stability of the nanofluids were confirmed through the measurement of their gel strength and
viscous properties with a rotational viscometer at 18, 48 and 72 h. Results obtained were very close. This
showed the stability of the nanofluids used and had the potential to meet field application requirements. The
nanofluids, compared to the bentonite mud, had a better viscous property and they exhibited a constant gel
strength (i.e. the 10 s and 10 min gel strength were identical). But, the API (American Petroleum Institute) fluid
loss characteristics of the nano-fluids and bentonite mud displayed a similar trend; but, no spurt loss was
recorded for the nano-fluids. The mud cakes produced by the nanofluids were thin and tightly packed, and with
a thickness of less than 1 mm.
At the post-treatment stage, the combination of surfactant in brine and nanoparticles which contains
internal breaker will enhance the removal of polymer residues from hydraulic fracture (Crews and Huang,
2010). These internal breakers are trapped in the thread-like micelles (TLM) that form the pseudo-filter cake,
and in those that leak into the formation (Crews and Huang, 2007).
There are research reports on the use of nanoparticles as a crosslinker of fracturing fluid as they
enhance the build-up of viscosity (Harnaus and Plank, 2015). Also, fracture conductivity that is related to a
croosslinked polymer fluid is yet to be resolved (Crews and Huang, 2010). From the research carried out for the
fracture conductivity of a crosslinked polymer fluid named particle park flow tests (i.e. flow tests through
particulate media), involved the loading of the flow cell with different sizes of sand proppants. In these tests, the
remedial cleanup fluid used was a mixture of 3% KCl brine, 0.072% wt. Cx40 nanoparticles (of approximately
35 nm size inorganic crystals), 1 and 3% wt. gel-forming surfactant, and 0.18 and 0.25% wt. polymer breaker E-
21. Particle park flow tests showed a reasonable resistance to fluid flow, even at a condition of a low surfactant
concentration in high-permeability medium. The effectiveness of internal breaker was proven by examining the
viscosity of effluent collected after post-flush. The viscosity took water-like nature due to the degradation of
TLM structure by the internal breaker and removal of more polymer residue. The degradation caused the
rearrangement of the structure of TLM into non-viscous spherical-shape micelle structure as depicted in Figure
5.
Figure 5. Degradation of TLM structure by the internal breaker (source: Crews and Huang, 2010).
Figure 6: Scheme for exploration and reservoir drilling using nanomaterials (Ogoloet al., 2012)
Exploration of hydrocarbons in an electromagnetic based reservoir is often carried out using a magnetic
nanoparticle. This is often preferred over other nanoparticles because, magnetic nanoparticle reduces the
magnetic permeability of rock formation in a reservoir and enhances high imaging resolution magnetic
measurement at a very low cost. Other application of nanotechnology in exploration and reservoir
characterization is the development of innovative nanomaterial based sensing device, primarily for monitoring
substances such as pollutants, toxic and hazardous gases. These pollutants include CO 2, H2S and other forms of
natural gases such as CH4 (Saiduret al., 2011; Metin, Baran and Nguyen, 2015).
2.5 Cementing
This is a process of preparing well for further drilling and oil production. Cementing a well is the
procedure of developing and pumping cement into place in a wellbore. Most commonly, cementing is used to
permanently shut off water penetration into the well. Oil well cement is generally used for this process. They
usually consist of Portland cement with special organic retarders to prevent the cement from settling too quickly.
During drilling operations, so many challenges set-in inside the wellbore such as wellbore failure, incomplete
cementing, formation damages due to drilling operations, inadequate cement formation, cement shrinkage,
filtration of cement slurry, incomplete cement placement, contamination of cement by drilling fluids and
fracture formation. All these affects the integrity of the oil-well. Also, during production challenges like cement
failure due to mechanical or thermal stress, corrosion of casing, degradation of cement due to carbonation,
sulfate or acid deposits may significantly lower the oil production. Therefore, the selection of cementing
materials as well as cementing procedures plays a key role to ensure the success in oil and gas exploration and
production. Research has revealed the use of a nano-sized smart materials as an additive in cementing with
desired specific properties (Harnaus and Plank, 2015). The use of nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes and
nanoparticles like TiO2, Fe2O3, Al2O3, ZrO3, CuO and ZnO2 in cementing helps in strengthening and increasing
durability, resistance to water penetration, acceleration of hydration reaction, control calcium leaching,
improves the impact and fracture toughness, enhances dry shrinkage and permeability resistance properties (Yu
et al., 2010).
2.7 Aquathermolysis
Heavy oil is known to be rich in heavier organic compounds such as resins and asphalthenes. They are
richer in compounds with at least 60 carbon atoms, in addition to heterocyclic derivatives. These mixtures
resulted to high physico-chemical characteristics such as high viscosity, high boiling and molecular weight.
These poses serious recovery difficulties. The mobility of the oil is seriously restricted and therefore
displacement by simple fluids like water or gas became inefficient. For these reasons, recovery factors become
limited. A number of interesting options are being considered for enhancing the recovery efficiency.These
options include: microbial recovery, thermal recovery, chemical recovery and steam recovery. Generally, these
recovery methods are associated with problems that limited their reliability. An alternative being considered is a
process called aquathermolysis.
This generally involves the degradation of unconventional heavy oils by the use of nanocatalyst and
nanoparticles which helps in reduction of the viscosity of the heavy oils containing higher molecular weight
hydrocarbons such as asphalthenes and resins. Research also showed that hydrogenation, hydrodesulphurisation,
Hydrodenitrogenation and hydrocracking are the major reactions taking place during aquathermolysis. Also one
of the major reason for this process is the bond cleavage of N, S, O containing compounds in the petroleum
fraction.Aquathermolysis results in irreversible lowering of heavy oil viscosity at temperature ranges from
200˚C - 300˚C(Abdelrahman, 2013). According to VBT, among C-O, C-S, and C-N chemical bonds, the C-S
bond energy is the least. Because of this, the C-S bond will break in the process of Aquathermolysis and result
in a low amount of sulphur and heavy components such as resin and asphalthenes. The hydrolysis of aliphatic
sulphur linkages is the main characteristic of these reactions
R-S-R + H2O …………………. CO + H2S + Lighter organic compounds
Hydrolysis is achieved by transferring hydrogen from water to the oil via WGSR
CO + H2O ………………….. CO2 + H2
Clerk et al., (1990) noted that using aqueous metal salts instead of water in steam stimulation improves the
properties of the recovered oil such as viscosity and asphalthene content. The observed improvements are due to
the catalytic effect of the metals on the aquathermolysis reactions which can further upgrade heavy oil under
steam stimulation.
References
[1]. Campelo J.M, Luna D, Luque R, Marinas J.M and Romero A.A. (2009). Sustainable Preparation of Supported Metal Nanoparticles
and their Application in Catalysis. ChemSusChem2:18–45
[2]. Subbiah R, Veerapandian M and Yun K. S. (2010). Nanoparticles: Functionalization and Multifunctional Applications in
Biomedical Sciences. Curr Med Chem17:4559–77.
[3]. Serrano E, Rus G and Garcia-Martinez J. (2009). Nanotechnology for Sustainable Energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev13:2373–84.
[4]. Fakoya, M.F; Patel, H and Shah, S.N. (2018). Nanotechnology: Innovative Applications in the Oil and Gas Industry. International
Journal of Global Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology. 1(1):16-30
[5]. Alshehri A. H, Jakubowska M, Mlozniak A, Horaczek M, Rudka D, Free C, et al. (2012). Enhanced Electrical Conductivity of
Silver Nanoparticles for High Frequency Electronic Applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces4:7007–10
[6]. Shen W, Zhang X, Huang Q, Xu Q and Song W. (2014). Preparation of Solid Silver Nanoparticles for Inkjet Printer Flexible
Electronics with High Conductivity. J. Nanoscale 6:1622–8.
[7]. Kumar R, Gupta A, and Dhakate S. R. (2015). Nanoparticles-decorated coal tar pitch-based carbon foam with enhanced
electromagnetic radiation absorption capability. RSC Adv5:20256–64.
[8]. Xu S, Habib A. H, Pickel A. D, McHenry M. E. (2015). Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Solder Composites for Electronic Packaging
Applications. Prog Mater Sci67:95–160.
[9]. Subbiah R, Veerapandian M and Yun K. S. (2010). Nanoparticles: Functionalization and Multifunctional Applications in
Biomedical Sciences. Curr Med Chem17:4559–77.
[10]. Mout R, Moyano D.F, Rana S and Rotello V. M. (2012). Surface Functionalization of Nanoparticles for Nanomedicine. ChemSoc
Rev41:2539–44.
[11]. You H, Yang S, Ding B and Yang H. (2013). Synthesis of Colloidal Metal and Metal Alloy Nanoparticles for Electrochemical
Energy Applications. ChemSoc Rev42:2880–904.
[12]. De Jong W.H and Borm P.J.A. (2008). Drug delivery and nanoparticles: applications and hazards. Int J Nanomed3:133–49.
[13]. Otsuka H, Nagasaki Y and Kataoka K. (2003). PEGylated Nanoparticles for Biological and Pharmaceutical Applications. Adv Drug
Deliv Rev55:403–19.
[14]. Kim B.H, Hackett M.J, Park J and Hyeon T. (2014). Synthesis, Characterization, and Application of Ultrasmall Nanoparticles.
Chem Mater26:59–71.
[15]. Saidur R, Leong K.Y and Mohammad H. A. (2011). A Review on Applications and Challenges of Nanofluids. Renew Sustain
Energy Rev15:1646–68.
[16]. Kapusta, S; Balzano L and TeRiele P.M. (2011). Nanotechnology applications in oil and gas exploration and production.
International Petroleum Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.
[17]. Negin C, Ali S and Xie Q. (2016). Application of nanotechnology for enhancing oil recovery-A Review. Petroleum. 2:324-333
[18]. Khalil Munawar, Badrul Mohamed J., Chong Wen Tong and Mohammed Ali Berawi (2017). Advanced Nanomaterials in Oil and
gas Industry: Design, Application and Challenges. Applied Energy 191 (2017) 287–310.
[19]. Maity S.K, Ancheyta J and Marroquin G. (2010). Catalytic Aquathermolysis used for Viscosity Reduction of Heavy Crude Oils: A
Review. J. Energy Fuel24:2809–16.
[20]. Khalil M, Lee R.L and Liu N. (2015). Hematite Nanoparticles in Aquathermolysis: A Desulphurization Study of Thiophene. J Fuel
ChemTechnol145:214–20.
[21]. Pachón L.D and Rothenberg G. (2008). Transition-Metal Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stability and the Leaching Issue.
ApplOrganometChem22:288–99
[22]. Ayyapan S, Gopalan R.S, Subbanna G.N, Rao C.N.R. (1997). Nanoparticles of Ag, Au, Pd, and Cu Produced by Alcohol Reduction
of the salts. J Mater Res12:398–401.
[23]. Jana N.R, Gearheart L and Murphy C.J. (2001). Evidence for Seed-Mediated Nucleation in the Chemical Reduction of Gold Salts to
Gold Nanoparticles. Chem Mater13:2312–22.
[24]. Sanyal U and Jagirdar B.R. (2012). Metal and Alloy Nanoparticles by Amine-Borane Reduction of Metal Salts by Solid-Phase
Synthesis: Atom Economy and Green Process. InorgChem51:13023–33.
IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-JAC) is UGC approved Journal with Sl. No. 4031,
Journal no. 44190.
Nworu, Jerome Sunday. " Application of Nanotechnology for Enhancing Oil Recovery (EOR)
in Oil and Gas Industry: A Review." IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-JAC) 12.2
(2019): 32-42.