HHS Public Access: Sex Differences in Cannabis Withdrawal Symptoms Among Treatment-Seeking Cannabis Users
HHS Public Access: Sex Differences in Cannabis Withdrawal Symptoms Among Treatment-Seeking Cannabis Users
Author manuscript
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Author Manuscript
Abstract
Over 300,000 individuals enter treatment for cannabis use disorders (CUDs) in the U.S. annually.
Cannabis withdrawal is associated with poor CUD treatment outcomes, but no prior studies have
examined sex differences in withdrawal among treatment-seeking cannabis users. Treatment-
seeking cannabis users (45 women and 91 men) completed a Marijuana Withdrawal Checklist
(MWC) at treatment intake to retrospectively characterize withdrawal symptoms experienced
during their most recent quit attempt. Composite Withdrawal Discomfort Scale (WDS) scores
were calculated using the 14 items on the MWC that correspond to valid cannabis withdrawal
symptoms described in DSM-5. Demographic and substance use characteristics, overall WDS
scores, and scores on individual WDS symptoms were compared between women and men.
Author Manuscript
Women had higher overall WDS scores than men, and women had higher scores than men on six
individual symptoms in two domains, mood symptoms (irritability, restlessness, increased anger,
violent outbursts) and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, stomach pain). Follow-up analyses
isolating the incidence and severity of WDS symptoms demonstrated that women generally
reported a higher number of individual withdrawal symptoms than men, and that they reported
experiencing some symptoms as more severe. This is the first report to demonstrate that women
seeking treatment for CUDs may experience more withdrawal then men during quit attempts.
Prospective studies of sex differences in cannabis withdrawal are warranted.
Keywords
Cannabis; Withdrawal; Sex Differences
Author Manuscript
Introduction
Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug worldwide (World Health Organization, 2014).
In the U.S., about 9 percent of the population meets lifetime criteria for cannabis use
disorder (CUD; Haberstick et al., 2013; Stinson et al., 2006). CUD is associated with a
Corresponding Author: Evan S. Herrmann, Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of
Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 11103, Phone: +1-646-774-6324,
FAX: +1-646-774-6141, [email protected].
Herrmann et al. Page 2
variety of other problems, including mental illness, decreased school performance and
Author Manuscript
Similar to other drugs of abuse (e.g., nicotine, opioids and alcohol), several studies have
indicated that there are sex differences in the development and presentation of CUDs.
Women begin to use cannabis at a later age then men, but progress more quickly to cannabis
dependence and treatment entry (“telescoping;” Hernandez-Avila et al., 2004; Ehlers et al.,
2010; Khan et al., 2013). Despite having similar patterns of cannabis use, women seeking
treatment for CUDs have higher Severity of Dependence Scale scores than men (Copeland
et al., 2001). To our knowledge, only two studies have examined sex differences in cannabis
withdrawal (Agrawal et al., 2008; Copersino et al., 2010). Agrawal and colleagues (2008)
examined symptoms of cannabis withdrawal among individuals who reported cannabis use
during the past 12 months using data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol
and Related Disorders. Women were more likely to report experiencing nausea, while men
were more likely to report goosebumps/pupil dilation (Agrawal et al., 2008). Copersino and
Author Manuscript
The current study improves upon designs of the two prior studies that examined sex
differences in cannabis withdrawal. First, both prior studies only reported on the incidence
of cannabis withdrawal symptoms (i.e., the percentage of women and men who experienced
a given symptom), without examining overall withdrawal or individual symptom severity
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 3
(i.e., how uncomfortable or disruptive experienced symptoms were). Data indicate that
Author Manuscript
symptom severity predicts higher levels of functional impairment and that treatments
tailored to target specific withdrawal symptoms may be useful (Allsop et al., 2012). Thus,
characterizing sex differences in overall withdrawal and in the incidence and severity of
individual withdrawal symptoms among treatment-seeking cannabis users has the potential
to inform the development of sex-specific treatments for CUDs. Second, the two prior
reports provide little data on the frequency and intensity of use of cannabis and other
substances among the study samples. This is important because other studies have
documented differences in use of cannabis and of other drugs that may influence withdrawal
symptoms between women and men (e.g., men may use more cannabis, have more alcohol
problems, and smoke more tobacco than women; Copeland et al., 2001; Khan et al., 2013),
which could have tempered results. To address this issue, the current study utilized samples
of men and women who were well characterized regarding recent cannabis use, and
Author Manuscript
excluded individuals who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for alcohol or other drug use disorders,
allowing us to better isolate relations between sex and cannabis withdrawal. Finally, since
treatment seeking cannabis users report more withdrawal symptoms than non-treatment
seeking users (Pacek and Vandrey, 2014), the current study examined whether the sex
differences in withdrawal reported previously (Agrawal et al., 2008; Copersino et al., 2010)
generalize to cannabis users seeking treatment.
The aim of this study is to thoroughly characterize sex differences in cannabis withdrawal
among treatment-seeking cannabis users. Here, we examine the incidence and severity of
cannabis withdrawal symptoms that women and men retrospectively reported experiencing
during their most recent quit attempt. Women and men in this sample are comparable in
terms of recent cannabis use and other factors (e.g. alcohol use) that may influence
withdrawal symptoms.
Author Manuscript
Methods
Participants
Participants were frequent cannabis users presenting for treatment at an outpatient research
clinic that was conducting a clinical trial examining an investigational pharmacotherapy for
treatment of CUD. Participants were recruited for the trial via flyers, radio ads, newspaper
ads, online classifieds ads (craigslist), and word-of-mouth referrals. Participants were
recruited for the parent trial and included in the present study if they met the following
criteria: 1) were between 18 and 55 years old, 2) reported using cannabis on at least 50 of
the past 90 days, 3) were not using cannabis for medical reasons as prescribed by a
physician, 4) were interesting in quitting cannabis use within the next month, 5) reported
Author Manuscript
that cannabis helps them sleep better at night or that they have had trouble sleeping in the
past when abstaining from cannabis, 6) reported making at least one voluntary attempt to
quit cannabis in their lifetime, 7) did not report any current major medical problems (e.g.,
heart failure), 8) reported drinking less than 20 standard drinks/week, 9) did not meet DSM-
IV-TR abuse or dependence criteria for any substances other than cannabis, tobacco, or
caffeine, 10) did not meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for any current major psychiatric problem
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 4
(e.g. major depression, psychosis), and 11) were not enrolled in another treatment study or
Author Manuscript
Measures
Demographics and substance use characteristics—Participants completed a
questionnaire that collected information about basic demographic variables (e.g., age, race,
ethnicity, sex, educational attainment) and a Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB; Robinson et al.,
2014; Sobell and Sobell, 1992) interview to assess frequency and intensity of substance use
(e.g., cannabis alcohol, tobacco, opioids, etc.) during the 90 days prior to the assessment.
Since cannabis is not often administered in standardized units (i.e., the amount of cannabis
included in a “joint” or “blunt” can vary greatly from user to user), we utilized a cannabis
substitute and digital scale in order to better estimate the quantity of cannabis in each
consumption unit reported on the TLFB (Norberg et al., 2012). Participants also completed
Author Manuscript
the Marijuana Quit Questionnaire (MJQQ; Boyd et al., 2005; Copersino et al., 2006a),
which is a 176-item, individually administered, self-report questionnaire that collects data on
demographic information, cannabis use history, and information about prior attempts to quit
cannabis use (Copersino et al., 2006).
“Please indicate whether or not you have experienced these symptoms and rate
their severity the last time you stopped smoking marijuana”
Participants then rated each of the 29 symptoms on a four-point scale (0=none, 1=mild,
2=moderate, 3=severe). A composite Withdrawal Discomfort Score (WDS) was calculated
as the sum of the MWC items known to be valid, reliable cannabis withdrawal symptoms
(American Psychiatric Association, 2013): depressed mood, irritability, nervousness/anxiety,
Author Manuscript
Data Analysis
Demographics and substance use characteristics—Demographics were compared
between women and men using independent-samples t-tests for continuous variables and
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 5
Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Substance use data (percentage reporting use of
Author Manuscript
all substances, intensity of cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol use, and history of attempts to quit
using cannabis) was extracted from the TLFB interview and the MJQQ and were compared
between women and men using t-tests/Fisher’s exact tests.
Results
Participant demographics/substance use
A total of 136 participants (45 women and 91 men) completed the screening interview, met
inclusion criteria, and were included in the present analyses. Participant demographics and
substance use characteristics are displayed in Table 1. Women and men significantly
differed on age of first cannabis use (16.0 years among women vs. 14.2 years among men, p
= 0.01) and the number of days in the past 90 days that they used cannabis (85.1 days among
women vs. 80.0 days among men, p = 0.03). Women and men did not differ in amount of
cannabis used in the last 90 days or in percentage than met DSM-IV criteria for cannabis
dependence. On average, both women and men reported several prior attempts to quit using
Author Manuscript
cannabis in their lifetime, and about three-fourths (i.e., 77% women, 70% men) reported
making at least one quit attempt within the past year. About three-fourths of women and
men reported using alcohol and tobacco at least once during the past 90 days, but were
generally light and infrequent users of these substances. A minority of participants reported
sporadic use of other substances (e.g., opioids, MDMA, etc.) in the past 90 days.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 6
Discussion
To our knowledge, this report is the first examination of sex differences in cannabis
Author Manuscript
withdrawal among treatment-seeking cannabis users, and the first to examine sex differences
in both the incidence and severity of cannabis withdrawal symptoms. Women and men were,
in general, well-matched on cannabis and other substance use characteristics that may have
affected withdrawal. Total withdrawal discomfort was over 40 percent higher (more half a
standard deviation) among women compared with men, and women reported more severe
withdrawal than men on six individual symptoms, which clustered in two areas, mood
symptoms (irritability, restlessness, increased anger, and violent outbursts), and
gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, stomach pain). Women were more likely to report
experiencing an increase in irritability, violent outbursts, and nausea during cannabis
abstinence than men, and reported more symptoms in total during their last period of
abstinence compared with men. Regarding symptom severity, women who experienced
nervousness/anxiety, restlessness, and/or increased aggression reported experiencing these
Author Manuscript
It is interesting that withdrawal severity was greater among women though they reported
very similar patterns of cannabis use to men, and a significantly later onset of cannabis use
compared with men. The neurobiological mechanism for this finding is somewhat uncertain,
but recent animal studies suggest a differential expression of the endocannabinoid system by
sex (e.g., Castelli et al., 2013; Craft et al., 2013) an influence of sex hormones on
cannabinoid receptor binding (Riebe et al., 2010; de Fonseca et al., 1994), and recent human
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 7
laboratory research suggests that women are more sensitive to acute cannabis effects than
Author Manuscript
men (Cooper and Haney, 2014). These studies provide some evidence suggesting that sex
differences in cannabis withdrawal may be biologically-mediated. However, human brain
imaging studies in this area are lacking and few controlled prospective studies evaluating the
acute and repeated effects of cannabis exposure have been adequately powered to evaluate
sex differences.
The results of this study parallel the findings of prior research conducted on cannabis
withdrawal and on other substance use disorders. Overall WDS scores and scores on
individual items observed here are comparable to the peak withdrawal scores reported
during periods of abstinence in prospective laboratory studies of cannabis withdrawal (e.g.,
Budney et al., 2003). This suggests that recall of withdrawal severity in this study was valid.
Further, the observation that women reported more severe cannabis withdrawal is consistent
with other reports on sex differences in withdrawal from alcohol (Stewart & Brown, 1995)
Author Manuscript
and tobacco (Hatsukami et al., 1995; Leventhal et al., 2007). This is potentially important
for treatment planning as findings from the larger substance abuse literature suggest women
and men differ in both withdrawal and treatment response. For example, evidence suggests
nicotine replacement therapy (e.g. Cepeda-Benito et al., 2004; Collins et al., 2004;
Hatsukami et al., 1995; Perkins, 2001; Wetter et al., 1999) and varenicline/buproprion
combination therapy (Rose & Behm, 2014) may be more effective for men than women,
while burproprion alone (Collins et al., 2004) and varenicline alone (Rose & Behm, 2014)
may be equally effective in both sexes. Since amelioration of withdrawal symptoms is
assumed to drive the efficacy of many pharmacotherapies for substance use disorders, data
on sex differences in withdrawal could be used to prospectively inform the development of
sex-specific pharmacotherapies.
Author Manuscript
That said, research on sex differences in CUD treatment response is lacking. A recent
Cochrane Review examined 14 studies of various pharmacotherapies for the treatment of
CUD (Marshall et al., 2014). Nine out of these 14 used cannabis withdrawal as an outcome
measure. Only one of these studies reported on the results of a formal comparison of
outcomes by sex (Cornelius et al., 2010), The fact that 13/14 of these studies did not
compared outcomes based by sex may at first seem surprising, however, 10/14 had samples
sizes of N=81 or less, and more than half of the trials were conducted with samples that
were 75% or more male. Thus, it is likely that the vast majority of studies examining
pharmacotherapies for CUD are not powered to detect sex differences in treatment response.
Given the sex differences in withdrawal reported here, and the sex differences observed in
response to pharmacotherapy for other substance use disorders (e.g., nicotine dependence;
Hatsukami et al., 1995; Rose & Behm, 2014), studies examining pharmacotherapies for
Author Manuscript
This study must be considered in light of limitations. First, the study design (retrospective,
self-report) limits the conclusions that can be drawn. It is impossible to determine if the sex
differences in withdrawal we observed are true differences in withdrawal, or just differences
in the way women and men report previously experienced withdrawal symptoms (see
Pomerleau et al., 1994). Second, we did not ask women about menstrual cycle phase during
their most recent quit attempt. This may have influenced results because symptoms of
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 8
cannabis withdrawal overlap with many symptoms women may experience during
Author Manuscript
premenstrual and menstrual phases of the cycle. Third, it is possible that women experienced
higher levels of mood and gastrointestinal symptoms than men for reasons unrelated to
cannabis withdrawal. Women may experience greater levels of life stress than men (e.g.,
Klonoff et al., 2000), which could lead to higher levels of mood disturbances (e.g.
Fernandez-Guasti et al., 2012) and gastrointestinal disturbances (Mayer et al., 2001). Future
studies could partially ameliorate the three above-mentioned limitations by: 1) collecting
withdrawal data from participants while they are using cannabis as usual to characterize
baseline symptomatology, 2) prospectively examining gender differences in cannabis
withdrawal symptoms that occur during biochemically-verified periods of abstinence, and 3)
characterizing and/or controlling for menstrual phase during early abstinence. Fourth, the
majority of our sample was African American and resided in an urban environment. It is not
known if these findings will generalize to treatment-seeking cannabis users with different
Author Manuscript
ethnic, racial, or environmental backgrounds. Though most of the participants in the present
study reported use of other substances, mainly alcohol and tobacco, there were no gender
differences in the current pattern of other substance use in this sample. Thus, it is unlikely
that tobacco, alcohol, or other substance use impacted the study outcomes.
References
Agrawal A, Pergadia ML, Lynskey MT. Is there evidence for symptoms of cannabis withdrawal in the
national epidemiologic survey of alcohol and related conditions? The American Journal on
Addictions. 2008; 17(3):199–208. [PubMed: 18463997]
Allsop DJ, Copeland J, Norberg MM, Fu S, Molnar A, Lewis J, Budney AJ. Quantifying the clinical
significance of cannabis withdrawal. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e44864. [PubMed: 23049760]
Allsop DJ, Norberg MM, Copeland J, Fu S, Budney AJ. The cannabis withdrawal scale development:
patterns and predictors of cannabis withdrawal and distress. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2011;
119(1):123–129. [PubMed: 21724338]
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5.
Washington, DC: Author; 2013.
Benyamina A, Lecacheux M, Blecha L, Reynaud M, Lukasiewcz M. Pharmacotherapy and
Author Manuscript
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 9
Budney AJ, Roffman R, Stephens RS, Walker D. Marijuana dependence and its treatment. Addiction
science & clinical practice. 2007; 4(1):4. [PubMed: 18292704]
Author Manuscript
Budney AJ, Vandrey RG, Hughes JR, Thostenson JD, Bursac Z. Comparison of cannabis and tobacco
withdrawal: Severity and contribution to relapse. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2008;
35(4):362–368. [PubMed: 18342479]
Cepeda-Benito A, Reynoso JT, Erath S. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy
for smoking cessation: Differences between men and women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology. 2004; 72:712–722. [PubMed: 15301656]
Castelli MP, Fadda P, Casu A, Spano MS, Casti A, Fratta W, Fattore L. Male and Female Rats Differ
in Brain Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Density and Function and in Behavioural Traits Predisposing
To Drug Addiction: Effect of Ovarian Hormones. Curr Pharm Des. 2013
Collins BN, Wileyto EP, Patterson F, Rukstalis M, Audrain-McGovern J, Kaufmann V, Lerman C.
Gender differences in smoking cessation in a placebo-controlled trial of bupropion with behavioral
counseling. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2004; 6:27–37. [PubMed: 14982685]
Cooper ZD, Haney M. Investigation of sex-dependent effects of cannabis in daily cannabis smokers.
Drug and alcohol dependence. 2014; 136:85–91. [PubMed: 24440051]
Author Manuscript
Copeland J, Swift W, Rees V. Clinical profile of participants in a brief intervention program for
cannabis use disorder. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2001; 20(1):45–52. [PubMed:
11239727]
Copersino ML, Boyd SJ, Tashkin DP, Huestis MA, Heishman SJ, Dermand JC, Gorelick DA.
Sociodemographic characteristics of cannabis smokers and the experience of cannabis withdrawal.
The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse. 2010; 36(6):311–319. [PubMed: 20678028]
Cornelius JR, Bukstein OG, Douaihy AB, Clark DB, Chung TA, Daley DC, Brown SJ. Double-blind
fluoxetine trial in comorbid MDD–CUD youth and young adults. Drug and alcohol dependence.
2010; 112(1):39–45. [PubMed: 20576364]
Craft RM, Marusich JA, Wiley JL. Sex differences in cannabinoid pharmacology: a reflection of
differences in the endocannabinoid system? Life Sci. 2013; 92:476–81. [PubMed: 22728714]
Ehlers CL, Gizer IR, Vieten C, Gilder DA, Stouffer GM, Lau P, Wilhelmsen KC. Cannabis
dependence in the San Francisco Family Study: age of onset of use, DSM-IV symptoms,
withdrawal, and heritability. Addictive behaviors. 2010; 35(2):102–110. [PubMed: 19818563]
Author Manuscript
Fernandez-Guasti A, Fiedler JL, Herrera L, Handa RJ. Sex, stress, and mood disorders: at the
intersection of adrenal and gonadal hormones. Hormone and metabolic research= Hormon-und
Stoffwechselforschung= Hormones et metabolisme. 2012; 44(8):607. [PubMed: 22581646]
Haberstick BC, Young SE, Zeiger JS, Lessem JM, Hewitt JK, Hopfer CJ. Prevalence and correlates of
alcohol and cannabis use disorders in the United States: Results from the national longitudinal
study of adolescent health. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2014; 136:158–161. [PubMed:
24440049]
Haney M, Bedi G, Cooper ZD, Glass A, Vosburg SK, Comer SD, Foltin RW. Predictors of marijuana
relapse in the human laboratory: robust impact of tobacco cigarette smoking status. Biological
psychiatry. 2013; 73(3):242–248. [PubMed: 22939992]
Hatsukami D, Skoog K, Allen S, Bliss R. Gender and the effects of different doses of nicotine gum on
tobacco withdrawal symptoms. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1995; 3(2):163.
Hernandez-Avila CA, Rounsaville BJ, Kranzler HR. Opioid-, cannabis-and alcohol-dependent women
show more rapid progression to substance abuse treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2004;
74(3):265–272. [PubMed: 15194204]
Author Manuscript
Klonoff EA, Landrine H, Campbell R. Sexist discrimination may account for well-known gender
differences in psychiatric symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2000; 24(1):93–99.
Khan SS, Secades-Villa R, Okuda M, Wang S, Pérez-Fuentes G, Kerridge BT, Blanco C. Gender
differences in cannabis use disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol
and Related Conditions. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2013; 130(1):101–108. [PubMed:
23182839]
Kouri EM, Pope HG Jr. Abstinence symptoms during withdrawal from chronic marijuana use.
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology. 2000; 8(4):483. [PubMed: 11127420]
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 10
Leventhal AM, Waters AJ, Boyd S, Moolchan ET, Lerman C, Pickworth WB. Gender differences in
acute tobacco withdrawal: effects on subjective, cognitive, and physiological measures.
Author Manuscript
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 11
Table 1
Demographic and substance use characteristics among women (n=45) and men (n=91) included in withdrawal
analyses. Data shown are group means (±SD) or % of subjects. Groups were compared using t-tests for
continuous variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Significant (p < 0.05) sex differences
are highlighted with bold text.
Average cigaretes per day (among smokers) 5.9 (6.7) 5.9 (5.0) 0.99
Alcohol (%) 73 74 0.55
Average drinks per week (among drinkers) 4.2 (6.4) 4.6 (5.9) 0.74
Opioids (%) 2 11 0.10
MDMA (%) 7 5 1.00
Cocaine (%) 7 2 0.33
Hallucinogins (%) 2 0 0.33
Amphetamines (%) 0 1 1.00
Synthetic Cannabinoids (%) 0 1 1.00
Sedatives/Hypnotics (%) 0 0 -
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 12
Table 2
Mean (±SD) Withdrawal Discomfort Scale (WDS) scores and mean (±SD) scores on individual symptoms
among women (n=45) and men (n=91). Scores were compared between women and men using t-tests.
Significant (p < 0.05) sex differences are highlighted with bold text.
Note. WDS = 14-item Withdrawal Discomfort Scale. WDS sum scores range from 0 (no symptoms reported) to 42 (all 14 symptoms reported as
severe). Scores on individual symptoms range from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).
*
Craving is reported separately as it is not one of the symptoms included in the WDS total score.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 13
Table 3
Incidence of Withdrawal.
Author Manuscript
Mean number of WDS symptoms reported, and the percentage of women and men who reported experiencing
each individual symptom among women (n=45) and men (n=91). Mean number of symptoms reported was
compared between women and men using a t-test and percentage reporting individual symptoms were
compared using Fisher’s exact tests. Significant (p < 0.05) sex differences are highlighted with bold text.
mean (±SD) number of WDS symptoms reported 7.9 (3.3) 6.2 (3.2) <0.01
depressed mood 76 64 0.12
irritability 89 73 0.05
nervousness/anxiety 51 51 1.00
restlessness 84 74 0.20
increased aggression 51 43 0.46
Author Manuscript
Craving is reported separately as it is not one of the symptoms included in the WDS total score.
Author Manuscript
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.
Herrmann et al. Page 14
Table 4
Mean (±SD) severity of Withdrawal Discomfort Scale (WDS) symptoms that were reported, and mean
severity scores on individual symptoms among women (n=45) and men (n=91). Scores were compared
between women and men using t-tests. Significant (p < 0.05) sex differences are highlighted with bold text.
Note. WDS = 14-item Withdrawal Discomfort Scale. Severity scores range from 1 (mild) to 3 (severe).
*
Craving is reported separately as it is not one of the symptoms included in the WDS total score.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 01.