Scribd
Upload
158 views

Theories of Punishment: (Text: 252)

The document discusses four theories of punishment: deterrent, retributive, reformative, and preventive. The deterrent theory aims to deter criminals and others from committing crimes by punishing offenders as a warning. The retributive theory focuses on vengeance and believes criminals deserve punishment proportional to their offenses. The reformative theory seeks to reform criminals' characters through education and treatment. Most recently, the preventive theory emphasizes reforming offenders to prevent future crimes through individualized treatment. While each theory has merits, combining elements may be most effective in utilizing punishment for social control.

Uploaded by

Manjare Hassin Raad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
158 views

Theories of Punishment: (Text: 252)

The document discusses four theories of punishment: deterrent, retributive, reformative, and preventive. The deterrent theory aims to deter criminals and others from committing crimes by punishing offenders as a warning. The retributive theory focuses on vengeance and believes criminals deserve punishment proportional to their offenses. The reformative theory seeks to reform criminals' characters through education and treatment. Most recently, the preventive theory emphasizes reforming offenders to prevent future crimes through individualized treatment. While each theory has merits, combining elements may be most effective in utilizing punishment for social control.

Uploaded by

Manjare Hassin Raad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Lecture 09

Theories of Punishment: (Text: 252)

- The ends of criminal justice are four in numbers,


and in respect to the purposes served by them
punishment can be divided as:

1. Deterrent; 2. Retributive; 3. Reformative.

Of these aspects the first is the essential and the all-


important one, the others being merely accessory.
Punishment before all things is deterrent, and the
chief end of the law of crime is to make the evil-
doer an example and a warning to all that are like-
minded with him.

Deterrent Theory:

According to this theory, the purpose of punishing


an offender or criminal who has done wrong is to
keep him aloof from (to deter) doing crime or
offence so that he cannot do it again. In fact other
offenders will take the lesson that if they do any
offences they will be punished not for doing the
crimes or offences rather they will be kept
themselves away from such wrong doings in future.
In this respect the offender is treated as means to
teach others that they should deter from crimes or
offences.

1
One of the primitive methods of punishments
believes in the fact that if severe punishments were
inflicted on the offender would deter him from
repeating that crime. Those who commit a crime, it
is assumed, derive a mental satisfaction or a feeling
of enjoyment in the act. To neutralize this
inclination of the mind, punishment inflicts equal
quantum of suffering on the offender so that it is no
longer attractive for him to carry out such committal
of crimes. Pleasure and pain are two physical
feelings or sensation that nature has provided to
mankind, to enable him to do certain things or to
desist (discontinue) from certain things, or to undo
wrong things previously done by him. It is like
providing both a powerful engine and an equally
powerful brake in the automobile. Impelled (push)
by taste and good appetite, which are feelings of
pleasure a man over-eats. Gluttony and surfeit make
him obese and he starts suffering disease. This
causes pain. He consults a doctor and thereafter
starts dieting . Thus the person before eating in the
same way would think twice and may not at all take
that food. In social life punishment introduces the
element of 'pain' to correct the excess action of a
person carried out by the impulse (pleasure) of his
mind. We all like very much to seize opportunities,
but abhor (dislike) when we face threats. But in
reality pain, threat or challenges actually
strengthens and purifies a man and so an
organization

2
J. Bentham, as the founder of this theory, states:
"General prevention ought to be the chief end of
punishment as its real justification. If we could
consider an offence, which has beeen, committed as
an isolated fact, the like of which would never
recur, punishment would be useless. It would only
be only adding one evil to another. But when we
consider that an unpunished crime leaves the path of
crime open, not only to the same delinquent but also
to all those who may have the same motives and
opportunities for entering upon it, we perceive that
punishment inflicted on the individual becomes a
source of security for all. That punishment which
considered in itself appeared base and repugnant to
all generous sentiments is elevated to the first rank
of benefits when it is regarded not as an act of wrath
or vengeance against a guilty or unfortunate
individual who has given way to mischievous
inclinations, but as an indispensable sacrifice to the
common safety."

Bentham's theory was based on a hedonistic


conception of man and that man as such would be
deterred from crime if punishment were applied
swiftly, certainly, and severely. But being aware
that punishment is an evil, he says,
If the evil of punishment exceeds the evil of the
offence, the punishment will be unprofitable; he
will have purchased exemption from one evil at the
expense of another.

3
The basic idea of deterrence is to deter both
offenders and others from committing a similar
offence. But also in Bentham's theory was the idea
that punishment would also provide an opportunity
for reform.

2. Retributive theory of punishment

This theory basically gives importance on the


seriousness of the consequences of crimes or
offences. This is why it justifies the law “eye for an
eye and a tooth for a tooth”.

The most stringent and harsh of all theories


retributive theory believes to end the crime in itself.
This theory underlines the idea of vengeance and
revenge rather than that of social welfare and
security. Punishment of the offender provides some
kind solace to the victim or to the family members
of the victim of the crime, who has suffered out of
the action of the offender and prevents reprisals
from them to the offender or his family. The only
reason for keeping the offender in prison under
unpleasant circumstances would be the vengeful
pleasure of sufferer and his family. J.M.Finnis
argues in favour of retributism by mentioning it as a
balance of fairness in the distribution of advantages
and disadvantages by restraining his will.
Retributivists believe that considerations under
social protection may serve a minimal purpose of
the punishment. Traditional retributism relied on

4
punishing the intrinsic value of the offence and thus
resort to very harsh methods. This theory is based
on the same principle as the deterrent theory, the
Utilitarian theory. To look into more precisely both
these theories involve the exercise of control over
the emotional instinctual forces that condition such
actions. This includes our sense of hatred towards
the criminals and a reliance on him as a butt of
aggressive outbursts.

3. Reformative Theory

According to this theory, the objective is to punish


the wrong doers or offenders to reform his or her
character so that he or she can abstain from doing
the same crimes. This theory give importance on
education in the training centre so that offenders can
be aware of the consequences of wrong doings.

But that is the beginning of a new story--the story


of the gradual Renewal of a man, the story of his
gradual regeneration, of his Passing from one world
into another, of his initiation into a new Unknown
life.

The author of the above excerpt in this concluding


paragraph underlines the basic principle of the
reformative theory. It emphasizes on the renewal of
the criminal and the beginning of a new life for him.

5
The most recent and the most humane of all theories
is based on the principle of reforming the legal
offenders through individual treatment. Not looking
to criminals as inhuman this theory puts forward the
changing nature of the modern society where it
presently looks into the fact that all other theories
have failed to put forward any such stable theory,
which would prevent the occurrence of further
crimes. Though it may be true that there has been a
greater onset of crimes today than it was earlier, but
it may also be argued that many of the criminals are
also getting reformed and leading a law-abiding life
all-together. Reformative techniques are much close
to the deterrent techniques.

Reform in the deterrent sense implied that through


being punished the offender recognized his guilt
and wished to change. The formal and impressive
condemnation by society involved in punishment
was thought to be an important means of bring
about that recognition. Similarly, others may be
brought to awareness that crime is wrong through
another's punishment and, as it were, 'reform' before
they actually commit a crime. But, although this is
indeed one aspect of rehabilitation, as a theory
rehabilitation is more usually associated with
treatment of the offender. A few think that all
offenders are 'ill' and need to be 'cured' but the
majority of criminologists see punishment as a
means of educating the offender. This has been the
ideal and therefore the most popular theory in recent

6
years. However, there is reason to believe this
theory is in decline and Lord Windlesham has noted
that if public opinion affects penal policy, as he
thinks it does, then there will be more interest
shown in retribution in the future.

This theory aims at rehabilitating the offender to the


norms of the society i.e. into law-abiding member.
This theory condemns all kinds of corporal
punishments. These aim at transforming the law-
offenders in such a way that the inmates of the
peno-correctional institutions can lead a life like a
normal citizen. These prisons or correctional homes
as they are termed humanly treat the inmates and
release them as soon as they feel that they are fit to
mix up with the other members of the community.
The reformation generally takes place either
through probation or parole as measures for
reforming criminals. It looks at the seclusion of the
criminals from the society as an attempt to reform
them and to prevent the person from social
ostracism. Though this theory works stupendously
for the correction of juveniles and first time
criminals, but in the case of hardened criminals this
theory may not work with the effectiveness. In these
cases come the importance of the deterrence
theories and the retributive theories. Thus each of
these four theories have their own pros and cons
and each being important in it, none can be ignored
as such.

7
Conclusion

We may recommend punishment as a method of


social control. We would like to summarize our
understanding about the theories of punishment:

# There is an attempt to portray punishments as a


method of inflicting of unpleasant circumstances
over the offender.

# Though certain theories like the reformative and


preventive rely upon humanitarian modes of
punishment, but these have a weakness against the
hardcore criminals.

#Punishments such as the retributive and deterrence


though the use of fear as an instrument to curb the
occurrence of crime helps in controlling the
criminals up to a certain extent. As these employ the
idea of revenge and vengeance (punishment) these
are much more harsher than others.

We would like to add our views on this very


controversial topic. We all know that truth is
stranger than fiction and so is the practice of these
theories. Though prisons are meant to be the place
where the criminals would be corrected or for that
case deterred from committing a wrong in the
future, but the present day witnesses the prisons to
have become redundant in their objective and
becoming sites of breeding for hardcore criminals.

8
9

You might also like