Nje 07 685

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Nepal Journal of Epidemiology

eISSN 2091-0800

Short Communication Open Access

Fungal keratitis: study of increasing trend and common determinants


Yogesh Acharya1, Bhawana Acharya2, Priyanka Karki3

Abstract:
Fungal keratitis is one of the leading cause of ocular morbidity. Fungal keratitis possesses a clinical challenge
due to its slow pathologic process, overlapping features, diagnostic difficulty, and potential complications. Its
increasing trend can be attributed to the use of contact lens, non-judiciary corticosteroid, and vegetative
trauma. Early diagnosis and treatment is the cornerstone for its effective control. Knowledge of pathological
course and clinical characteristics of fungal keratitis will definitely add in early diagnosis and treatment, with
reduction in ocular morbidity. This review article explores the risk factor of fungal keratitis, its clinical course
and management strategy.

Keyword: Fungal eye Infections; contact lenses; risk factor; prevalence; complication.

Correspondence: Dr. Yogesh Acharya, MD, Assistant Professor, Research director, Department of
epidemiology and preventive health, Avalon University School of Medicine, Santa Rosaweg 122-124,
Willemstad, Curacao, Netherland Antilles
Email: [email protected]
Received 15 October 2016/Revised 20 May 2017/Accepted 30 May 2017
Citation: Acharya Y, Acharya B, Karki P. Fungal keratitis: study of increasing trend and common
determinants. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2017;7(2); 685-693.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2017 CEA& INEA. Published online by NepJOL-INASP.


www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJE

685
million dollar in health care [4]. Contact lens provides a direct
Introduction threat for microbial keratitis and around 26 million contact
Eye is the most beautiful thing in the world. Pure appreciation lens users have significant ocular health risk. Fungal keratitis
of beauty is only possible with the intact functioning eye. It is is also an important predictor of ocular health in developing
well said that vision controls the mind. We believe in what we countries and is a major cause of unilateral blindness.
see and we prefer to see what we believe in. Eye is a delicate Risk factors:
organ and is kept free of pathogens and harmful Eye is susceptible to microbial infection due to local and
microorganism by its natural protective mechanism. This systemic factors that invade the protective mechanism. These
natural check and balance is absolutely necessary for a healthy local factors like trauma to the eye ball, introduces and
eye. Breach of this delicate balance of protective environment inoculates various fungal members into the eye with or
can lead to ocular diseases with visual morbidity. without bacterial associates. Risk factors associated with
Cornea is the major refractive and protective outer layer of fungal keratitis are Male, Trauma, Contact lens use, Topical
eye. Inflammation of the cornea is known as keratitis. There corticosteroid use, Diabetes mellitus, and Low socioeconomic
are several causes of keratitis: infectious, physical or chemical. status.
Infectious or microbial keratitis is a predictor of general health Vegetative ocular trauma is undoubtedly the most common
due to its higher incidence in community and associated risk factor for fungal keratitis. Ocular trauma is essential to
complications. Microbial keratitis has long been a challenge breach an intact corneal epithelium for introduction of
for the physicians’ due to its varied presentation, overlapping microbial organism. Vegetative trauma predisposes to fungal
symptoms, and rapid progression. Bacterial keratitis is the infections being an important identifiable cause. It is
most prevalent amongst microbial keratitis. But there has been extremely rare to encounter a case of fungal keratitis in an
a constant surge in fungal keratitis in the recent times due to otherwise healthy eye, without any associated risk factors.
multiple overlaying factors. Despite being a slow process in This is because intact cornea is fairly resistant to microbial
comparison to bacterial counterpart fungal keratitis possesses infections. Trauma helps to introduce and inoculate fungi
considerable ocular morbidity. Fungal keratitis carries a directly into the cornea. Male are particularly more prone to
significant risk in developing countries and is one of the fungal keratitis, as outdoor activities and farming practices
leading causes of vision loss [1]. Vegetative trauma in predisposes to vegetative trauma.
agriculturist and sand particles are the most common causes of CL use has become widespread in recent times. With an
mycotic keratitis in developing countries [2]. Middle age increase in CL use in the general community, the overall cases
workingmen are more susceptible and constitutes majority of of fungal keratitis are also increasing. Although CL is
cases. Whereas, contact lens (CL) use is the leading cause in implicated for major proportion of fungal keratitis, the overall
developed countries. prognosis is better in contact lens induced keratitis [3]. Factors
Fungi are distinct group of microbial organism. They are associated with CL use and chances of fungal keratitis include
ubiquitous microbial eukaryotic pathogens. Fungal keratitis, nocturnal use during sleep, male gender, smoking history and
also known as keratomycosis, is an important cause of socioeconomic status, relating to unhygienic contact lens
microbial keratitis in the general population. Fungi are behavior [5]. Microbes have higher chance of adherence to
classified as yeasts or moulds. Yeasts ore oval or round cornea with CL. Hypoxia and hypercapnia are pathogenic
bodies, with blastoconidium. Moulds are filamentous changes associated with CL induced microbial keratitis [6].
structures, known as hyphae. Hyphae can form a large mass of Antibiotics and corticosteroids use also render the eye
filaments known as mycelium. These filaments can be septate susceptible to infections. Steroid has been the cornerstone of
or non-septate. Fungi are capable of reproducing sexually as medical management for inflammatory disease process in
well as asexually. Sexual reproduction takes place through modern medicine. Excessive steroid use leads to decrease in
formation of spores and asexual by conidia or host defense mechanism and creates a favorable environment
sporangiospores. Fungi infecting cornea are generally in for fungal inoculation. Systemic disease like diabetes mellitus
asexual phase of life cycle, when cultured. Yeast like fungi are has emerged as a major risk factor in the recent years. Diabetes
associated with the past history of ocular diseases, surgery and is becoming a global public health problem. Host defense is
steroid use with poor clinical outcome. Filamentous fungi are severely impaired in diabetes and high glucose provides a
usually found in patients with a history of ocular trauma [3]. suitable growth media for microbial organism.
Epidemiology:
There are more than 900,000 physician visit and 58,000
emergency visits related to keratitis and contact lens use in
US, accounting an estimated expenditure of around $175

686
Table-2: Commonly isolated fungi in microbial keratitis.

Fungi

Common Uncommon

1. Fusarium 1. Lophotrichus spp.


2. Aspergillus 2. Alternaria spp.
3. Candida 3. Acremonium spp.
4. Cladosporium 4. Cryptococcus albidus
5. Curvularia 5. Pythium insidiosum
6. Rhizopus 6. Other : Beauveria bassiana,
Paecilomyces,
Cunninghamella spinosum,
Scedosporium apiospermum,
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa,
Cylindrocarpon lichenicola,
Cladorrhinum bulbillosum.

Fig-1: Peripheral corneal fungal keratitis in slit-lamp Fig-2: Fungal keratitis with satellite lesions in slit-lamp
microscopy. microscopy.

Fig-3: Corneal fungal ulcer with Hypopyon in slit-lamp Fig-4: Corneal fungal abscess at periphery with infiltration
microscopy. in slit-lamp microscopy.

687
Fungal species: feathery margins and endothelial plaques (Fig-1). Satellite
Apergillus and Fusarium are two major cause of fungal lesion is typically seen in fungal keratitis (Fig-2). Hypopyon is
keratitis. Aspergillus is associated with higher incidences of detected in most of the cases, which can lead to ocular
complications but shows better response with antifungal hypertension (Fig-3). The identified risk factor for hypopyon
medications. Fungal keratitis due to Candida species has the includes infection with Fusarium and Aspergillus, in
worst clinical outcome [7]. Common fungal isolates from particular; and long duration of symptoms with larger lesion
corneal scrapping of patients with clinically suspected keratitis size [23]. It is not uncommon to see deep stromal infiltration,
are listed in Table-2. corneal abscess and dissemination of infection.
Fusarium is mainly associated with contact lens induced Once the presumptive diagnosis is made, corneal scrapping
keratitis. It is necessary to recognize Fusarium keratitis early and corneal biopsy is taken as required for inoculation and
in the period of its progression and adequate measures should isolation of organism. There are different ways to illustrate the
be taken to minimize the ocular morbidity [8]. There have presence of fungal keratitis. These methods include Gram’s
been multiple reported incidences of Fusarium keratitis with stain, Potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount, and Calcofluor
CL and ReNu CL solution (Bausch & Lomb) for lens care. white fluorescent staining and finally culture. Common culture
This can be attributed to poor contact lens hygiene and media for fungus is Sabourauds Dextrose Agar. Direct
improper use habits. Some of these patients required visualization with KOH wet mount is commonly implicated
emergency penetrating keratoplasty for severe complicating followed by culture, being the most conclusive. (2) KOH is
keratitis despite the medical treatment [9]. There are different applied in corneal scrapping to dissolve epithelial strands. Use
Fusarium species and complexes responsible for keratitis; of 10% KOH better aids in fungal recognition and diagnosis.
Fusarium solani species complex, Fusarium oxysporum Definitive diagnosis lays on the foundation of culture and
species complex and Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. isolation. Culture facilitates the direct visualisation of fungi
Fusarium solani species complex is the most common [10]. under microscopy. Culture and sensitivity will also guide the
There are many other fungal species implicated in fungal use of appropriate anti-fungal therapy for superior clinical
keratitis. These fungal species are responsible for sporadic recovery.
cases of fungal keratitis and include: Lophotrichus spp. [11], Polymerase Chain Reaction [24] and dot hybridization [25] are
Alternaria spp. [12], Acremonium spp. [13], Cryptococcus newer rapid detection technique for sensitive and specific
albidus [14]), Pythium insidiosum [15], Beauveria bassiana diagnosis of fungal species. They have higher sensitivity than
[16], Paecilomyces [17], Cunninghamella spinosum [18], KOH wet mount and Gram smear [26] and are able to detect
Scedosporium apiospermum [19]), Rhodotorula mucilaginosa the fungus successfully in culture negative cases [27]. PCR
[20], Cylindrocarpon lichenicola [21], Cladorrhinum high-resolution melting analysis is a variant PCR technique
bulbillosum [22]. Lophotrichus species were isolated from the that is effective in differentiating between filamentous fungi
necrotic corneal sample complicating fungal keratitis after dog and yeast form [28].
paw traumatic injury [11]. Management:
Presentation: Management of fungal keratitis is directed by the objectives:
Keratitis usually presents with ocular pain, foreign body a) distinctive diagnostic procedure to correctly identify the
sensation and blurred vision. Affected eye will be red and the disease process, b) concurrent use of effective treatment
patient can have injection of the conjunctiva. Intense modalities, c) eradication of the disease process, d)
inflammatory process after infection usually results in copious minimizing the complication, and e) prevention of future
amount of ocular secretions but secretions in fugal keratitis are recurrences. This is achieved by the use of topical antifungal
usually scanty in contrast to other microbial infections. medication with or without surgical interventions. It is
Diagnosis: absolutely necessary to halt the disease progression early in
Diagnosis of fungal keratitis starts with strong clinical the pathogenic process to reduce the overall complications and
suspicion with concurrent presence of risk factors. Diagnosis associated ocular morbidity.
is strongly supported by suggestive clinical presentations and Pharmacological management:
fungal isolation from corneal sample. Antibiotic Pharmacological treatment of fungal keratitis rest on topical
unresponsiveness provides a clinical clue for diagnosis. Direct anti-fungal medications. There are currently no available
microscopic examination of cornea with subsequent of corneal antifungal recommendations in accordance with specific
sample culture, still remains the gold standard for fungal fungal isolation. Many of these anti-fugal differ in their
diagnosis. corneal penetration activity and effectiveness. Topical
Keratitis is best examined under slit lamp microscopy. Slit instillation of the active antimicrobial pharmacological agents
lamp microscopy will show dry, thick and raised corneal is still remains the gold standard treatment protocol. There are
surface. Majority of cases will have stromal infiltrates with
688
conflicting reports of intra-stromal injections but it has not keratitis with corneal melting. They decrease corneal
shown proven added benefit over topical instillation [29]. perforation and recurrences in majority of patient [38]. CXL-
Natamycin remains the cornerstone of anti-fungal therapy. PACK is safer procedure but it can increase the likelihood of
Natamycin (5%) is the treatment of choice for filamentous bacterial keratitis in the patient because of epithelial removal
fungi. Poor response to natamycin is directly related to necessary for the procedure. In addition to to it there are other
increase infiltrate, larger scar size and perforation probability potential factors responsible for causing keratitis, which can
[30]. For candida species topical amphotericin B (0.1-0.3%) is range from use of contact lens after local corticosteroid after
frequently implicated with superior response [31]. There has the procedure. It is necessary for the physician to properly
been increasing evidence of topical voriconazole use in fungal counsel the patient about this complication and caution should
keratitis with favourable clinical outcome. Topical be taken to avoid them [39, 40].
voriconazole is especially useful in fungal keratitis not Complications:
responding to natamycin [29]. Topical voriconazole is also Fungal keratitis can result in several complications leading to
effective against Cladosporium species [32]. There are visual disability. These complications can range from
different patterns of drug susceptibility in different groups of formation of abscess and mild to severe corneal scarring with
fungi. Therefore it is warranted that fungal specimen is taken loss of vision due to dissemination (Fig-4). Severe long-term
and culture grown, for identification and antimicrobial disease process can lead to corneal perforation and
sensitivity, if no response is visible after initiation of treatment dissemination of infection. Fungal infection also facilitates
[33]. other superadded microbial keratitis. Patient can have an
Some fungal infection responds to topical fluoroquinolones, anterior segment disruption with increased intraocular pressure
namely moxifloxacin [34]. This initial response leads to leading to glaucoma. Similarly it can result in endophthalmitis
assumption of bacterial infection and eventually accounts for resulting in evisceration making the patient visually handicap.
higher chances of complications with delay in diagnosis. It is Recent developments:
necessary to understand that fluoroquinolone monotherapy There are newer approaches for diagnosis of fungal corneal
will not be able to control most of the fungal infection and in infection and treatment methods. Dot hybridization assay has
turn can lead to prolongation of the disease course with been used successfully to diagnose Cryptococcus albidus, a
chances of relapse. rare fungi which and treated with intra-stromal injection of
Surgical management: Amphotericin B [14]. MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) are RNA
Surgery is definitely a choice for fungal keratitis, when molecules in humans that do not code. They are responsible
response to pharmacological agent is poor and there is for regulation of functions in the human cell and show very
imminent threat of perforation. Surgery will eliminate the high tissue specificity. They can be identified by PCR
necrotic, infectious and antigenic source of ocular insult with technique. They are evidences of increased MiRNA expression
creation of favourable environment for pharmacological agents in fungal keratitis, indicating its role in pathologic process and
to act and fastens healing [35]. potential target for modifications in the future [41].
Periodic debridement is an excellent procedure to remove dead Calprotectin is a neutrophil derived protein with potent
and necrotic tissues from cornea. Debridement helps to antimicrobial property. Calprotectin uses Zn and Mn chelation
improve the blood circulation, increase topical drug to inhibit fungal growth. It has proven beneficial effect in
effectiveness and finally decrease the overall microbial load Aspergillus fumigatus growth inhibition in experimental mice
for speedy recovery. Conjunctival flap and lamellar or model and awaits further work in humans [42]. Lectin-like
penetrating keratoplasty is applied in severe keratitis where a oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (LOX-1) [43],
pharmacological agent fails. Patch graft and transplant can be spleen-tyrosine kinase (Syk) [44, 45] and intracellular
used as final resort to restore the cornea and normal vision, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein
whenever possible. (NOD)-like receptors [46] have also been isolated from
Corneal crosslinking: Aspergillus infected corneal epithelial cells. LOX-1, Syk and
Corneal crosslinking is an effective approach to control NOD have basic role in modification of signalling pathways
microbial keratitis. It is proven to have an excellent ulcer and its inhibitors can be used to regulate fungal growth in the
healing properties and induce overall reduction in hypopyon future.
formation. There are few incidences of opacification of lens Photodynamic therapy with rose Bengal has been successful in
after crosslinking procedure [36]. Its efficacy is limited in viral restriction of certain fungal growth [47]. Riboflavin/UV-A has
keratitis due to incidences of corneal melting and tectonic also been effective in Fusarium, Aspergillus and Candida after
keratoplasty [37]. Corneal collagen cross-linking with pre treatment with amphotericin B [48]. Combination therapy
photoactivated riboflavin (CXL-PACK) has shown a of antifungal medication with UV-A can prove safe and
promising outcome in-patient with advanced microbial alternative to single therapy [49].
689
Discussion 7. Spleen-tyrosine kinase (Syk)
There has been progressive incline in microbial keratitis in the 8. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)
recent time. Fungal keratitis, in particular, has the highest risk Authors’ contributions:
and possesses a significant threat for increased ocular YA and BA conceived the idea. YA, BA, and PK reviewed the
morbidity owing to its slower course and diagnostic difficulty. literature and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed,
This rapid surge can be attributed to increased contact lens edited and agreed on the final version of this manuscript.
use, and non judiciary antimicrobial and corticosteroid use, Authors’ affiliations:
1
complicated by systemic disease interfering with immune Assistant professor, Avalon University School of Medicine,
status. Most of the cases in western world can be attributed to Willemstad, Curacao, Netherland Antilles.
2
unhygienic contact lens use, whereas vegetative trauma in Registered nurse, VHA home health care, Toronto, Ontario,
working class is the major cause in developing countries. Male Canada.
3
has higher incidences of fungal keratitis but corneal re- Medical officer, Nobel Medical College and Hospital,
epithelialization time is higher in female in comparison with Biratnagar, Morang, Nepal.
males, accounting higher recovery period [50]. Conflict of interest:
Fusarium and Aspergillus are the common isolates from The authors hereby announce that they have no conflict of
corneal scrapping, Fusarium associated with CL use. Healthy interest arising from the study.
eye is relatively immune to fungal infection and ocular trauma Source of Support:
provides an excellent opportunity for pathologic fungal Nil
inoculation into eye. Fungal keratitis has a relatively slow References
progression with dreadful complication that can range from 1. Słowik M, Biernat MM, Urbaniak-Kujda D, Kapelko-
corneal scarring to perforation and eventually loss of vision. Słowik K, Misiuk-Hojło M. Mycotic Infections of the Eye.
Presence of satellite lesion is a strong indicator of fungal Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015;24(6):1113-7. doi:
origin and strong clue can be provided by the fact that fungal 10.17219/acem/50572. PMID: 26771986.
corneal ulcers are not responsive to traditional antibiotics. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/50572
There is a major reduction in ocular morbidity with early 2. Gupta MK, Chandra A, Prakash P, Banerjee T, Maurya OP,
diagnosis and treatment [1]. The traditional approach consists Tilak R. Fungal keratitis in north India; Spectrum and
of slit lamp microscopic examination and corneal scrapping diagnosis by Calcofluor white stain. Indian J Med Microbiol.
for identification and culture. There are newer rapid diagnostic 2015;33(3):462-3. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.158609. PMID:
technique with higher sensitivity and specificity like PCR. The 26068366.
prompt diagnosis is to be followed by effective management. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.158609
Management is guided by topical antifungal therapy and 3. Inoue Y, Ohashi Y, Suzuki T, Shimomura Y, Fukuda M,
surgery, if needed. Sotozono C, Hatano H, Eguchi H, Araki-Sasaki K, Hoshi S,
Conclusion Sunada A, Asari S, Yaguchi T, Makimura K, Yokokura S,
Fungal keratitis is one of the leading causes of ocular Mochizuki K, Monden Y, Nejima R; Multicenter Study Group
morbidity. Recognized common risk factors include vegetative of Fungal Keratitis in Japan. [Multicenter Prospective
trauma, widespread contact lens use, prolonged non-judiciary Observational Study of Fungal Keratitis--Current Status of
corticosteroid prescription, and systemic disease like diabetes Patients' Background, Clinical Findings, Treatment and
mellitus. Fungal keratitis possesses a clinical challenge due to Prognosis]. [Article in Japanese] Nippon Ganka Gakkai
its slow pathologic disease process, overlapping features with Zasshi. 2016;120(1):5-16. PMID: 26950964.
other microbial keratitis and potential complications. The PMid:26950964
knowledge of clinical characteristics of fungal keratitis with its 4. Collier SA, Gronostaj MP, MacGurn AK, Cope JR,
determinants will certainly help in early diagnosis and overall Awsumb KL, Yoder JS, Beach MJ; Centers for Disease
reduction in visual morbidity associated with it. Control and Prevention (CDC). Estimated burden of keratitis--
United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.
List of abbreviations: 2014;63(45):1027-30. PMID: 25393221.
1. Contact Lens (CL) PMid:25393221
2. Potassium Hydroxide(KOH) 5. Liesegang TJ. Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: Part
3. Polymerase Chain Reaction(PCR) I: Epidemiology. Cornea. 1997;16(2):125-31. PMID: 9071523.
4. Collagen cross-linking with photoactivated riboflavin https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199703000-00033
(CXL-PACK) https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199703000-00002
5. MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) PMid:9071523
6. Lectin-like oxidized receptor-1 (LOX -1)
690
6. Liesegang TJ. Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: Part 2015;94(19):e885. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000885.
II: Pathophysiology. Cornea. 1997;16(3):265-73. PMID: PMCID: PMC4602580 PMID: 25984681.
9143796. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000885
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199705000-00002 15. Lelievre L, Borderie V, Garcia-Hermoso D, Brignier AC,
PMid:9143796 Sterkers M, Chaumeil C, Lortholary O, Lanternier F. Imported
7. Nielsen SE, Nielsen E, Julian HO, Lindegaard J, Højgaard pythium insidiosum keratitis after a swim in Thailand by a
K, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J, Heegaard S. Incidence and clinical contact lens-wearing traveler. Am J Trop Med Hyg.
characteristics of fungal keratitis in a Danish population from 2015;92(2):270-3. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0380. Epub 2014
2000 to 2013. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(1):54-8. doi: Dec 22. PMCID: PMC4347328 PMID: 25535313.
10.1111/aos.12440. Epub 2014 May 19. PMID: 24836583. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0380
https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12440 16. Mitani A, Shiraishi A, Miyamoto H, Sunada A, Ueda A,
8. Hu S, Fan VC, Koonapareddy C, Du TT, Asbell PA. Asari S, Zheng X, Yamamoto Y, Hara Y, Ohashi Y. Fungal
Contact lens-related Fusarium infection: case series experience keratitis caused by Beauveria bassiana: drug and temperature
in New York City and review of fungal keratitis. Eye Contact sensitivity profiles: a case report. BMC Res Notes.
Lens. 2007;33(6 Pt 1):322-8. PMID: 17993829. 2014;7:677. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-677. PMCID:
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3180645d17 PMC4189432 PMID: 25260975.
PMid:17993829 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-677
9. Gorscak JJ, Ayres BD, Bhagat N, Hammersmith KM, 17. Arnoldner MA, Kheirkhah A, Jakobiec FA, Durand ML,
Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Burday M, Mirani N, Jungkind D, Hamrah P. Successful treatment of Paecilomyces lilacinus
Chu DS. An outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with keratitis with oral posaconazole. Cornea. 2014;33(7):747-9.
contact lens use in the northeastern United States. Cornea. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000143. PMCID: PMC4071292
2007;26(10):1187-94. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318142b932. PMID: 24858020.
PMID: 18043174. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000143
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318142b932 18. Bhandary SV, VijayaPai H, Rao LG, Yegneswaran PP.
10. Sun S, Lyu Q, Han L, Ma Q, Hu H, He S, Tao S, Zhang J, Cunninghamella spinosum fungal corneal ulcer- first case
Zhang H, Wang L. [Molecular identification and in vitro report. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(3):375-6. doi:
susceptibility of Fusarium from fungal keratitis in central 10.4103/0301-4738.130436. PMCID: PMC4061691 PMID:
China]. [Article in Chinese] Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 24722275.
2015;51(9):660-7. PMID: 26693650. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.130436
PMid:26693650 19. Kalkan Akçay E, Açıkgöz ZC, Can ME, Celikbilek N,
11. Eghrari AO, Gibas C, Watkins T, Vahedi S, Lee R, Houle Dereli Can G, Cağıl N. [Fungal keratitis caused by
E, Suarez MJ, Eberhart C, Sutton DA, Wiederhold NP, Sikder Scedosporium apiospermum: first report from Turkey].[Article
S, Zhang SX. First Human Case of Fungal Keratitis Caused by in Turkish] Mikrobiyol Bul. 2013;47(4):727-33. PMID:
a Putatively Novel Species of Lophotrichus. J Clin Microbiol. 24237443.
2015;53(9):3063-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00471-15. Epub 2015 https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.5262
Jun 24. PMCID: PMC4540931 PMID: 26109445. PMid:24237443
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00471-15 20. Saha S, Sengupta J, Chatterjee D, Banerjee D. Rhodotorula
12. Usui T, Misawa Y, Honda N, Tomidokoro A, Yamagami mucilaginosa Keratitis: a rare fungus from Eastern India.
S, Amano S. Nontraumatic keratomycosis caused by Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(3):341-4. doi: 10.4103/0301-
Alternaria in a glaucoma patient. Int Ophthalmol. 4738.111133. PMCID: PMC4061676 PMID: 23619486.
2009;29(6):529-31. doi: 10.1007/s10792-008-9260-0. Epub https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.111133
2008 Sep 17. PMID: 18797820. 21. Gaujoux T, Borsali E, Gavrilov JC, Touzeau O,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9260-0 Goldschmidt P, Despiau MC, Chaumeil C, Laroche L,
13. Haddad RS, El-Mollayess GM. Combination of Borderie V. [Fungal keratitis caused by Cylindrocarpon
intracameral and intrastromal voriconazole in the treatment of lichenicola].
recalcitrant Acremonium fungal keratitis. Middle East Afr J [Article in French] J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012;35(5):356.e1-5. doi:
Ophthalmol. 2012;19(2):265-8. doi: 10.4103/0974- 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Dec 2. PMID:
9233.95271. PMCID: PMC3353683 PMID: 22623874. 22137679.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.95271 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2011.06.005
14. Huang YH, Lin IH, Chang TC, Tseng SH. Early diagnosis 22. Gajjar DU, Pal AK, Santos JM, Ghodadra BK, Vasavada
and successful treatment of Cryptococcus albidus keratitis: a AR. Severe pigmented keratitis caused by Cladorrhinum
case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore).
691
bulbillosum. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011;29(4):434-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 16. PMCID:
10.4103/0255-0857.90191. PMID: 22120812. PMC4122634 PMID: 24746358.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.90191 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.004
23. Xu LJ, Song XS, Zhao J, Sun SY, Xie LX. Hypopyon in 31. Thomas PA. Fungal infections of the cornea. Eye (Lond).
patients with fungal keratitis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003;17(8):852-62. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700557. PMID:
2012;125(3):470-5. PMID: 22490405. 14631389.
24. Thomas PA, A Teresa P, Theodore J, Geraldine P. PCR for https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700557
the molecular diagnosis of mycotic keratitis. Expert Rev Mol 32. Cheng SC, Lin YY, Kuo CN, Lai LJ. Cladosporium
Diagn. 2012;12(7):703-18. doi: 10.1586/erm.12.65. PMID: keratitis - a case report and literature review. BMC
23153238. Ophthalmol. 2015;15:106. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0092-1.
https://doi.org/10.1586/erm.12.65 PMCID: PMC4545699 PMID: 26286482.
25. Kuo MT, Chang HC, Cheng CK, Chien CC, Fang PC, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0092-1
Chang TC. A highly sensitive method for molecular diagnosis 33. Sunada A, Asari S, Inoue Y, Ohashi Y, Suzuki T,
of fungal keratitis: a dot hybridization assay. Ophthalmology. Shimomura Y, Fukuda M, Sotozono C, Hatano H, Eguchi H,
2012;119(12):2434-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.049. Araki-Sasaki K, Hoshi S, Yaguchi T, Makimura K, Yokokura
Epub 2012 Sep 8. PMID: 22968143. S, Mochizuki K, Monden Y, Nejima R; Multicenter Study
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.049 Group of Fungal Keratitis in Japan. [Multicenter Prospective
26. Vengayil S, Panda A, Satpathy G, Nayak N, Ghose S, Observational Study of Fungal Keratitis--Identification and
Patanaik D, Khokhar S. Polymerase chain reaction-guided Susceptibility Test of Fungi]. [Article in Japanese] Nippon
diagnosis of mycotic keratitis: a prospective evaluation of its Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2016;120(1):17-27. PMID: 26950965.
efficacy and limitations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. PMid:26950965
2009;50(1):152-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1283. Epub 2008 Aug 34. Matoba AY. Fungal keratitis responsive to moxifloxacin
8. PMID: 18689703. monotherapy. Cornea. 2012;31(10):1206-9. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1283 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f766c. PMCID: PMC3436968
27. Tananuvat N, Salakthuantee K, Vanittanakom N, Pongpom PMID: 22673848.
M, Ausayakhun S. Prospective comparison between https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f766c
conventional microbial work-up vs PCR in the diagnosis of 35. Thomas PA, Kaliamurthy J. Mycotic keratitis:
fungal keratitis. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(10):1337-43. doi: epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Clin Microbiol
10.1038/eye.2012.162. Epub 2012 Aug 10. PMCID: Infect. 2013;19(3):210-20. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12126.
PMC3470041 PMID: 22878442. Epub 2013 Feb 9. PMID: 23398543.
https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.162 https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12126
28. Goldschmidt P, Degorge S, Che Sarria P, Benallaoua D, 36. Ramona B, Catalina C, Andrei M, Daciana S, Calin T.
Semoun O, Borderie V, Laroche L, Chaumeil C. New strategy Collagen crosslinking in the management of microbial
for rapid diagnosis and characterization of fungal infections: keratitis. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2016;60(1):28-30. PMID:
the example of corneal scrapings. PLoS One. 27220229.
2012;7(7):e37660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037660. Epub PMid:27220229
2012 Jul 2. PMCID: PMC3388096 PMID: 22768289. 37. Papaioannou L, Miligkos M, Papathanassiou M. Corneal
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037660 Collagen Cross-Linking for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic
29. Sharma N, Chacko J, Velpandian T, Titiyal JS, Sinha R, Review and Meta-Analysis. Cornea. 2016;35(1):62-71. doi:
Satpathy G, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. Comparative evaluation 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000644. PMID: 26509768.
of topical versus intrastromal voriconazole as an adjunct to https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000644
natamycin in recalcitrant fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology. 38. Said DG, Elalfy MS, Gatzioufas Z, El-Zakzouk ES,
2013;120(4):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.023. Epub Hassan MA, Saif MY, Zaki AA, Dua HS, Hafezi F. Collagen
2012 Dec 12. PMID: 23246119. cross-linking with photoactivated riboflavin (PACK-CXL) for
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.023 the treatment of advanced infectious keratitis with corneal
30. Sun CQ, Lalitha P, Prajna NV, Karpagam R, Geetha M, melting. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1377-82. doi:
O'Brien KS, Oldenburg CE, Ray KJ, McLeod SD, Acharya 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 25. PMID:
NR, Lietman TM; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. 24576886.
Association between in vitro susceptibility to natamycin and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.011
voriconazole and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis. 39. Pérez-Santonja JJ, Artola A, Javaloy J, Alió JL, Abad JL.
Ophthalmology. 2014;121(8):1495-500.e1. doi: Microbial keratitis after corneal collagen crosslinking. J

692
Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):1138-40. doi: 48. Sauer A, Letscher-Bru V, Speeg-Schatz C, Touboul D,
10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.036. PMID: 19465303. Colin J, Candolfi E, Bourcier T. In vitro efficacy of antifungal
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.036 treatment using riboflavin/UV-A (365 nm) combination and
40. Sharma N, Maharana P, Singh G, Titiyal JS. Pseudomonas amphotericin B. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(8):3950-
keratitis after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: case 3. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4013. Epub 2010 Mar 24. PMID:
report and review of literature. J Cataract Refract Surg. 20335618.
2010;36(3):517-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.041. PMID: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4013
20202556. 49. Choi KS, Yoon SC, Rim TH, Han SJ, Kim ED, Seo KY.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.041 Effect of voriconazole and ultraviolet-A combination therapy
41. Boomiraj H, Mohankumar V, Lalitha P, Devarajan B. compared to voriconazole single treatment on Fusarium solani
Human Corneal MicroRNA Expression Profile in Fungal fungal keratitis. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2014;30(5):381-6.
Keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(13):7939-46. doi: 10.1089/jop.2013.0167. Epub 2014 Apr 11. PMCID:
doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17619. PMID: 26720440. PMC4043359 PMID: 24724576.
https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17619 https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2013.0167
42. Clark HL, Jhingran A, Sun Y, Vareechon C, de Jesus 50. Krishnan T, Prajna NV, Gronert K, Oldenburg CE, Ray
Carrion S, Skaar EP, Chazin WJ, Calera JA, Hohl TM, KJ, Keenan JD, Lietman TM, Acharya NR. Gender differences
Pearlman E. Zinc and Manganese Chelation by Neutrophil in re-epithelialisation time in fungal corneal ulcers. Br J
S100A8/A9 (Calprotectin) Limits Extracellular Aspergillus Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):137-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-
fumigatus Hyphal Growth and Corneal Infection. J Immunol. 2011-300441. Epub 2011 Oct 6. PMCID: PMC3830552
2016;196(1):336-44. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502037. Epub PMID: 21979901.
2015 Nov 18. PMID: 26582948. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300441
https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1502037
43. Li C, Zhao G, Che C, Lin J, Li N, Hu L, Jiang N, Liu Y.
The Role of LOX-1 in Innate Immunity to Aspergillus
fumigatus in Corneal Epithelial Cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
Sci. 2015;56(6):3593-603. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15989. PMID:
26047046.
https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15989
44. Liu Y, Zhao G, Lin J, Li C, Li Q, Che C, Wang Q, Hu L.
The role of Syk signaling in antifungal innate immunity of
human corneal epithelial cells. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:55.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0041-z. PMCID: PMC4451931
PMID: 26036769.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0041-z
45. Poeck H, Ruland J. SYK kinase signaling and the NLRP3
inflammasome in antifungal immunity. J Mol Med (Berl).
2010;88(8):745-52. doi: 10.1007/s00109-010-0631-4. Epub
2010 Apr 17. PMID: 20401456.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-010-0631-4
46. Zhang Y, Wu J, Xin Z, Wu X. Aspergillus fumigatus
triggers innate immune response via NOD1 signaling in
human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2014;127:170-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.025. Epub 2014 Aug 6. PMID:
25108222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.025
47. Arboleda A, Miller D, Cabot F, Taneja M, Aguilar MC,
Alawa K, Amescua G, Yoo SH, Parel JM. Assessment of rose
bengal versus riboflavin photodynamic therapy for inhibition
of fungal keratitis isolates. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(1):64-
70.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
PMCID: PMC4075940 PMID: 24792103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.007
693

You might also like