Sea Label
Sea Label
Sea Label
Feasibility Study
NEXUS
INVESTMENT SOLUTION
Feasibility Study
Acronyms
CIS: Corrugated Iron Sheet
KOSPI: Kombolcha Steel products Industry
KMPF: Kality Metal Products Factory
CSA: Central Statistical Agency
i
Feasibility Study
Contents
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
2. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
ii
Feasibility Study
iii
Feasibility Study
iv
Feasibility Study
List of Tables
v
Feasibility Study
List of Figures
vi
Feasibility Study
1. Executive Summary
This feasibility study prepared for Sea Label Trading PLC to assess the viability of
establishing a corrugated iron sheet factory at Debre-birhan some 130 km away from
Addis Ababa to the north.
Sea Label Trading PLC is owned by young, knowledgeable and energetic business men
and woman with the objective of trading and investment on Industry.
The study includes market, technical, organization & management and financial
feasibility study components.
Market
The market study conducted indicated that there is an ample demand for corrugated
iron sheet products that are basically used in the construction sector. The construction
industry makes significant contributions to the socio-economic development process of
the country. Its importance emanates largely from the direct and indirect impact it has
in all economic activities. The construction sector has been growing significantly over
the past decade. With a rapidly growing GDP, GDP growth rate by the construction
sector was 13% in 2001/02 and reached 26.2% in 2010/11. The ten year average GDP
growth rate by the construction activity is 22.05%.
Corrugated Iron sheets are mainly used for roofing and wall cladding purposes. Most
rural residences are covered by roofing made of grass. Due to the economic
development registered consecutively for the past six years, the per capita income has
shown significant growth. The rural home owner is changing the grass roofing with
corrugated iron sheets. This is being observed in every part of the country. In urban
areas, majority of dwellers are living in rented houses. There is an acute shortage of
houses all over the country. At the country level, the percentage of rented houses has
increased from 49.4% in year 2004 to 50.3 % in year 2011. This indicates that huge
1
Feasibility Study
number of houses needs to be constructed all over the country demanding huge
quantity of corrugated iron sheet for roofing.
Corrugated iron sheets demand has been fulfilled through supply both from local
production and imports from countries like India. In this regard, the feasibility study
confirmed that unfulfilled demand will continue to increase.
The corrugated iron sheet demand is projected to reach 1,566,815 M. tons in year
2018.
Technical
The plant will have an annual capacity of profiling 7,582 tons of corrugated iron sheet
based on 300 working days. Accordingly, it is planned that the plant will produce
1,080,000 sheets of 0.2 mm (35 gauge), 440,791 sheets of 0.25 mm (32 gauge), 208,668
sheets of 0.32mm (30gauge) and 112,990 sheets of 0.4mm (28gauges).
A lean and efficient organizational structure headed by General Manager, with the
supporting staff has been envisaged. The General Manager will function as the overall
Head and will be supported by Departmental Heads of Operation and Administration,
Marketing& Finance.
2
Feasibility Study
The total manpower requirement for both the plant and administration has been
estimated to be 22 on the basis of functional requirement of a modern plant.
Finance
The total Investment cost of corrugated iron sheet factory project is estimated to be
Birr 35,301,905. Of this, Birr 9,379,189 is the cost of fixed assets while Birr 25,922,719
is the cost of working capital and pre operational costs.
The project’s investment cost will be covered from owner’s equity and Bank loan. The
projected profit and loss statement indicates that the engineering design and
fabrication unit will make a net profit of Birr 12.6 million Birr in the first year of
operation. The cash flow statement also indicates that the project is liquid.
Financial return analysis indicates that the project will generate an acceptable internal
rate of return.
3
Feasibility Study
2. BACKGROUND
Sea Label Trading PLC a private company with limited liability, duly incorporated under
the laws of Ethiopia.
The founders of the company have long experiences and remarkable success records in
business and investment in Ethiopia.
A general manager appointed by the general assembly, runs the day-to-day activities of
the company through various departments and services. A general Manager will
receive guidance from the advisory board and report its activity to the advisory board.
The corrugated iron sheet manufacturing Industry has established its vision; as
becoming ‘a leading steel products manufacturer’. This will be achieved through
becoming a multifaceted company committed to providing maximum customer
satisfaction. To achieve this vision, it has been resolved upon a set of strategies.
Executing these strategies translates directly in to the ability to serve the company’s
vision and objectives. The company’s visions are to be implemented through local and
external partnership.
4
Feasibility Study
5
Feasibility Study
3. Market Study
3.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW
According to the world steel association, demand for steel products will pick in the
years to come.
Apparent steel use in China is expected to grow by 3.5% in 2014 following a 1.9%
increase in 2013. In 2015, steel demand is expected to grow by 2.5% as the Chinese
government’s measures to control investment in an effort to rebalance the economy
will remain in place.
In India, steel demand is also expected to pick up and will grow by 5.9% in 2014
following 2.5 % growth in 2013 as monetary easing is expected to support investment
activities. In 2015, growth in steel demand is expected to further accelerate to 7.0%
thanks to the reform measures aimed at narrowing the fiscal deficit, coupled with
measures to improve the foreign direct investment climate.
In 2013, in the US, after growth of 8.4% in 2012 due to the automotive and energy
sectors and an increasingly resilient construction recovery, apparent steel use is
forecasted to grow by 2.7%. In 2015, steel demand is expected to increase by 2.9%.
Steel demand in the MENA region is expected to grow by 3.2% in 2014 after 2.2%
growth in 2013 aided by reconstruction activities in the Arab Spring countries and Iraq
as political turmoil in the region phases out. In 2015, steel demand in the region will
further accelerate to 7.1% growth to reach 70 Mt supported by strong construction
activities.
In Sub-Saharan Africa the steel demand will grow sharply, as most countries are
registering growth.
Corrugated iron sheets: is a building materials made by cold rolling mild steel and
galvanizing it to produce a liner corrugated pattern. Corrugated iron sheets are
classified according to their thickness and surface area. Standard gauge sizes are 28, 30,
6
Feasibility Study
The table below (Table 1) illustrates Ethiopian standard for corrugated iron sheets.
Table 1: Ethiopian standard for corrugated iron sheets
Thickness
t Breadth Length
(excluding coating) b l Zinc Coating Nominal
Mass per
sheet
(including
Nominal Tolerance Nominal Tolerance Nominal Tolerance Minimum Correspo
coating)
mm mm mm mass on nding
kg
two sides thickness
g/m2 on each
side
µm
0.16 2.88
±10% 875 +25 2000 +20 183 13
0.20 -15 -0 3.50
0.25 4.29
0.32 ±10% 875 ±10 2000 +20 -214 15 5.45
0.40 -0 6.71
0.50 ±10% 875 ±8 2000 +20 305 21 8.46
0.63 -0 10.50
0.50 ±10% 875 ±8 3000 +30 305 21 12.69
0.63 -0 15.57
Source: Ethiopian authority for standardization (ESA)
7
Feasibility Study
According to Metal Industry Development Institute (MIDI), the main vision of the
country with respect to metal and engineering industry is to see internationally
competitive metal and engineering industry in Ethiopia and to provide sector specific
and coordinated technology support by making use of capable professionals with the
view of enhancing the capacity and use of technology.
Currently, Ethiopian Iron and Steel industry is at its infant stage with few players
supplying the market with products like corrugated iron sheets, reinforcement steel
bars, hollow sections, nails, wires, etc. Figure 1 illustrates the number and form of
ownership of basic iron and steel industries in, 2010/11.
39
40
30
18
20
9
10 4 3 2 2 1
0
With regard to the location, most are located in Addis Ababa followed by Oromia
Regional State.
8
Feasibility Study
Dire dawa, 2
Tigray, 8
Addis Ababa,
16
Oromia, 10
Amahara, 3
9
Feasibility Study
The industries producing/processing corrugated iron sheets are a mix of old and new
entrants. These industries are briefly discussed below:
In Ethiopia, Corrugated sheets have been used for roofing purposes since Emperor
Minilik’s time. During that time, only the royal families and homes of the king’s officials
were roofed by corrugated galvanized iron sheets. All the other houses were hut type
covered with grasses.
The first factory to produce corrugated iron sheets was the Akaki Metal Products
Factory established during Emperor Haile Silasie’s regime. As towns and cities
expanded and newly established in different parts of the country, corrugated iron
sheets became popular roofing material. This further promoted the demand for
corrugated galvanized iron sheets.
Today, there are many factories which produce different types of roofing materials.
Very recently, clay roofing, EGA sheets are becoming used for residential houses and
10
Feasibility Study
industrial buildings. The major factories that supply corrugated galvanized iron sheets
(CGIS) are discussed below:
2. Alem Steel PlC: Is a privately owned steel company established in 1998. The
company is located in Addis Ababa, around Hana mariam area and produces
Galvanized roofing sheets. Alem steel has an annual capacity of 36,000 metrics
tones annually.
3. Osaka Steel Plc: Is a privately owned steel company established in 2002. The
company is located in Addis Ababa, around Hana mariam area and produces
Galvanized roofing sheets. Osaka steel has an annual capacity of 36,000 metrics
tones annually.
4. DH Geda is a private limited company that produced Galvanized iron sheets
with different gages. The company’s capacity under three shifts per
dayoperation is about 25,520 metric ton of light gauge and 31, 200Metric Ton
of heavy gauges per annum. The product classifications of DH-Geda corrugated
iron sheets are:
020 mm x 875 mm x 2000 mm
025 mm x 875 mm x 2000 mm
032 mm x 875 mm x 2000 mm
040 mm x 875 mm x 2000 mm
11
Feasibility Study
The factory is located in Akaki- Kaliti sub city and has a manufacturing capacity
of 9,440 tons of corrugated iron sheets per annum.
Table 6 illustrates that major factory that supply corrugated galvanized iron sheets
(CGIS) in local markets.
TABLE 4: LOCAL SUPPLY POTENTIAL OF ROOFING MATERIALS
No Factory
1 Yesu Plc
2 Alem Steel Plc
3 Kombolcha Steel Products Industry
4 Ethiopian Steel Plc
5 DH Geda Corrugated Galvanized Iron
Sheets Factory
6 Akaki Metal Products Factory
7 Kaliti Metal Products Factory
8 Bereket Corrugated Galvanized Iron
Sheets Factory
12
Feasibility Study
A large proportion of the country’s requirement for corrugated iron sheets has been
met through domestic production. Figure 3 shows the supply of the product from
domestic productions. The average domestic production during 2005/06 to 2006/07
was about 359,598 tons. A huge increase is observed during recent years i.e. 2006/07-
2008/2009. By the year 2006/07 domestic production registered 604,973 tons and this
subsequently increased to 643,903 tons in year 2007/08. During the following two
consecutive years; local production reached its peak value of 785,925 tons in year
2008/09 and afterwards the production declined to 464,304 tons in year 2009/10. The
production further declined in year 2010/11 to 147,299 tons.
13
Feasibility Study
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
SOURCE: CSA
3.3.3 Import
Metals, in different forms are imported to Ethiopia each year. In fact, metals are one of
the major imported items. These products include:
Butt welding fitting of iron or steel
Threaded elbows, bends and sleeves of iron or steel
Flags of iron or steel
Tubes or pipe fitting of stainless steel
Butt welding fitting (excel elbow and bends) of stainless steel
Flanges’ of stainless steel
Railway rails of iron or steel
Hollow drill bars and rods of alloy or non-alloy steel
Bars and rods of alloy steel
Angles, shapes and section of iron or steel
Sheet piling of iron or steel
Wire of alloy steel
U, I or H section of iron/steel, hot rolled, etc
14
Feasibility Study
Each year, Ethiopia spends hundreds of millions dollar to import metal products. In the
past decades alone (2002-2011), the country has spent more than 3 billion dollars on
import of metal products.
15
Feasibility Study
FIGURE 4: IMPORT QUANTITY AND VALUE OF CORRUGATED IRON SHEETS IN ETHIOPIA (2007 - 2011)
20,000.00
ton 15,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
0.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
300,000.00
250,000.00
CIF Value ('000ETB)
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Source: ERCA
16
Feasibility Study
The total supply or apparent consumption which was 114, 815 tons in year 2006,
increased to 644,666 tons in year 2008 after which, it increased to 802,472 tons in year
2009. However, in year 2010, supply has decreased to a level of 481,355 tons due to
low quantity of local production.
3.4 Demand
Corrugated iron sheet, the sole initial product of the envisaged project is used for
construction purposes. Hence, the demand for the product mainly depends on growth
of the economy in general and specifically on the growth of the construction sector.
11.2
11
GDP Growth rate
10.8
10.6
10.4
10.2
10
9.8
2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
SOURCE: GTP
17
Feasibility Study
The growth is expected to be broad based. Agriculture is expected to grow by 8.6% per
annum while industry and services are expected to show average annual growth of
20% and 10%.
FIGURE 6: PROJECTED INDUSTRIAL GROWTH % GDP
Projected Industrial Growth% GDP
25
20
15
10
0
2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
SOURCE: GTP
The construction sector has been growing significantly over the past decade. This
increase is due to the significant increases in both private and government expenditure
in the industry. On the part of the government, massive road and building construction
activities have been undertaken. The private sector has also been actively involved
although overall construction is dominated by the government. Similarly the share of
real estate and rentals has increased significantly during the past few years from
around 6 percent in 2000/01 to about three fold in recent years. This increase in the
share of the real estate and renting is partly attributed to the increase in construction
sector and a relatively increased allocation of the share of household income to the
sector.
As described above the investment in the construction sector is largely dominated by
government investments.
18
Feasibility Study
19
Feasibility Study
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Industry/Year 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/082008/9 2009/10 2010/11
Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry (10.6) 6.3 22.4 30.8 27.7 29.9 54.4 37.2 3.1 32.9
Crop (19.6) 13.9 32.0 38.3 29.7 36.6 65.4 39.6 (2.3) 31.9
Animal Farming and Hunting (1.5) (2.0) 11.6 25.9 29.7 19.2 32.8 35.1 17.8 39.6
Forestry 4.4 2.0 12.4 9.3 11.3 20.5 41.2 21.9 8.6 17.8
Fishing (0.1) (25.3) 97.2 33.8 24.5 17.4 43.3 30.5 31.3 9.6
Mining and Quarrying 6.5 13.8 4.1 18.4 20.8 (6.0) 44.9 37.9 94.9 217.2 (2.8)
Manufacturing 10.2 9.0 11.1 18.2 29.0 29.6 27.7 17.0 22.1 (6.5) 16.0
Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing 10.5 6.6 21.6 33.9 31.4 20.2 17.3 18.8
Small Scale and Cottage Industries 4.2 0.4 6.0 20.4 12.0 19.2 25.7 45.1 16.4 28.5
Electricity and Water 5.6 6.9 15.2 7.7 18.7 35.4 11.0 6.8 18.2 19.1
Construction 13.0 15.2 25.3 19.1 25.6 33.9 29.5 33.9 (1.2) 26.2
Whole Sale and Retail Trade (4.0) 18.6 14.1 20.8 31.9 37.7 44.3 52.4 12.4 25.0
Hotels and Restaurants 9.5 7.4 11.0 17.4 34.2 53.6 48.6 57.7 43.5 46.6
Transport and Communications 6.6 12.2 19.7 36.2 0.6 15.5 17.9 36.6 25.2 54.8
Financial Intermediation (26.6) 37.5 13.0 22.2 35.2 20.8 36.1 58.9 2.5 46.1
Real Estate, Renting and Business Activities 28.2 12.2 5.4 10.8 21.8 46.7 49.4 21.6 49.1 40.2
Public Administration and Defense 0.1 6.4 (0.5) 14.3 16.2 16.5 32.0 23.3 18.2 30.3
Education 17.3 27.0 5.9 15.7 27.0 27.4 28.2 19.3 19.6 12.4
Health and Social Work 3.0 (2.7) 16.5 22.3 14.9 21.9 32.9 21.0 18.5 25.1 (2.4)
Other Community, Social & Personal Services 16.7 13.8 15.4 22.5 27.9 39.8 44.3 11.1 23.8
Private Households with Employed Persons 6.4 8.1 10.0 6.5 32.2 15.7 36.5 33.1 8.1 31.6
Total (2.4) 10.6 16.1 23.7 24.6 31.0 44.8 36.7 12.1 33.8
Less: FISIM (37.5) 36.0 16.8 14.9 47.4 19.2 38.1 53.5 10.6 31.3
Gross Value Added at Current Basic Prices (2.0) 10.4 16.1 23.8 24.4 31.0 44.9 36.6 12.1 33.8
TaxesonProducts (3.6) 9.4 43.0 13.3 14.5 25.7 37.7 14.0 48.5 29.1
GDP at Current Market Prices (2.2) 10.3 18.0 22.9 23.6 30.6 44.4 35.1 14.2 33.5
Source: MOFED
20
Feasibility Study
As shown in Table 7 GDP growth rate by the construction sector has registered a substantial
increase over the years. The growth is characterized by a slight drop in some years. The average
ten year growth of GDP by construction sector is 22.05%.
Therefore, the construction sector has grown in recent years dramatically, where a number of
construction activities have been undertaken in different parts of the country.
The urban development policy underlines development of housing by associations & individuals,
Government and real estate developers. Housing production is impeded primarily by a severe
shortage of serviced residential plots. The low supply of residential land in relation to demand
has pushed prices beyond the reach of the large majority of the city dwellers. The price of
acquiring use rights to residential plots has risen much faster than the inflation rate in recent
years as a result of stagnant production and low availability.
In the capital Addis Ababa, The houses that are going to be constructed by associations and
individuals are becoming low in units as there are no enough plots allocated for such purpose. In
this regard, the current trend is mainly diverted to Government condominium houses and real
estate development activities.
Following the Growth and Transformation Plan, the Government of Ethiopia announced that it
will give land for association and individuals to enable them construct houses.
The Government has planned to construct low cost houses in all parts of the country. From year
2006/2007 to 2010/2011, the Integrated Housing Development program issued by the Ministry of
Works and Urban Development indicate that, 396,000 houses were to be constructed in 194
towns.
21
Feasibility Study
The table below shows the Government plan for year 2006/2007 to 2010/2011.
TABLE 8 GOVERNMENT INTEGRATED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (2006/2007 - 2010/2011)
Region 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 Total
No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of
Towns Houses Towns Houses Towns Houses Towns Houses Towns Houses
Oromiya 11 9020 14 12628 18 18040 23 27060 66 66748
Source: Integrated Housing Development Program, Ministry of Works & Urban Development
According to Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP) document released recently, by the end of
2009/10, out of the planned 396,000 houses, only 213,000 houses had been built in various
regions and city administrations. The achievement stands at 54%, only a little above half. This is
very low aggravating the housing problem.
During the GTP period (2010/11 – 2014/15), low cost housing would also be promoted for the
low and middle income households particularly in Addis Ababa. The housing program is planned
to be executed in a way it promotes domestic savings, reduced slums and improves the urban
development.
22
Feasibility Study
The Government’s plan in the GTP period is summarized in the table below.
TABLE 9 GOVERNMENT HOUSING CONSTRUCTION PLAN DURING THE GTP PERIOD
Indicator Base Year Annual Targets(‘000)
(2009/10) 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
Number of houses 53 30 30 30 30 30
constructed and transferred
to users in Addis Ababa (‘000)
Decreased in Slum Areas (%) 60 54 45 42 36 30
In other regional administration, condominium houses like that of Addis Ababa are not popular
and in some regional cities it has failed as there were no buyers. However, though not as much
gear as the previous planning period, Regional Governments will continue to build condominium
houses during the GTP period.
Household Characteristics
The central Statistics Agency undertakes household survey every four years. Dwelling and/or
other status of households demonstrates the economic welfare of the households.
Most rural people own their residence, made of inferior quality. This has contributed
tremendously to the national average figure of 84.3 (2004/05). In urban areas, one can estimate
that there is low dwelling ownership and this is manifested by acute shortage of houses in many
major cities of the country.
23
Feasibility Study
50
owned
40
rented
30
%
rent free
20 others
10 not stated
0
1996 1998 2000 2004 2011
SOURCE: CSA
24
Feasibility Study
Surprisingly, the rented percentage in urban areas increased from 49.4% to 50.3 % during 2004 to
2011 respectively. This indicates that housing problem has increased from year to year. The trend
indicated in figure 8 shows that current dwelling ownership is below 50%.
Due to favorable economic policy and investment environment, a number of investments are
being carried by foreign and local private investors.
The gradual integration of the country into the global economy coupled with the growing inflow
of foreign direct investment has caused a large number of people to come to the country.
Accordingly, the number is believed to grow significantly during the growth and Transformation
period (GTP).
Table 11: Summary Of Licensed All Investment Projects by Sector and Status
Since January 01, 1992 - 2012
No. of Projects
Investment Implementation Operational Pre-implementation Total
Type Phase Phase phase
Domestic 2,232 4,452 37,900 44,584
Foreign 501 1,258 5,898 7,657
Total 2,733 5,710 43,798 52,241
Source: Ethiopian Investment Agency
As shown in Table 11, the numbers of projects which are in under implementation and pre-
implementation phase are almost 85% of the total projects. Surely, these will demand huge
corrugated iron sheets.
25
Feasibility Study
1. Historical growth (Time series): this method assumes that past supply trend will continue
in the future. The historical supply data is fitted to a power equation of
190016x0.8283 to project the future demand.
1,200,000
y = 190016x0.8283
1,000,000 R² = 0.5964
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
TABLE 12: CORRUGATED IRON SHEETS DEMAND (TON), time series method
Year Demand
(Ton)
2014 1,118,479
2015 1,226,418
2016 1,332,420
2017 1,436,700
2018 1,539,433
2. End user consumption Method: In this method the following assumptions are used to
project the approximate end user demand of corrugated iron sheets. These are:
The Ethiopian population will increase by 2.6% per annum.
According to CSA, household size about five people.
The trends that shift from grass and other roof construction materials to
corrugated iron sheets are increased by on average by 10 % per annum (basedon
GDP growth planned during the GTP).
One house will use at least 30 pieces of corrugated iron sheets.
26
Feasibility Study
Most of the time the house use 35 gages of corrugated iron sheets for roof and
this gages has 3.15 kg weight.
Based on those assumptions the demand for corrugated iron sheets are reached 1,474,196.85
tons in 2018. See the table below Table 13: Projected Demand
Year Population Household New House roof shift Total house Total T
house from other (roof with consumption of Cor
materials to CIS CIS) CIS in piece she
2014 88,762,679 17,752,535.86 449,869.33 10,314,496.55 10,764,365.88 1,017,232,575.41 1,
2015 91,070,509 18,214,101.79 461,565.93 11,345,946.20 11,807,512.13 1,115,809,896.73 1,
2016 93,438,342 18,687,668.44 473,566.65 12,480,540.82 12,954,107.47 1,224,163,155.84 1,
2017 95,867,739 19,173,547.82 485,879.38 13,728594.90 14,214,474.28 1,343,267,819.86 1,
2018 98,360,300 19,672,060.06 498,512.24 15,101,454.40 15,599,966.64 1,474,196,847.34 1,
When an end user consumption method and times series analysis compared; both methods
resulted in similar trend quantities with close differences. Hence, the average of the two is taken
as the demand for corrugated iron sheets.
27
Feasibility Study
28
Feasibility Study
Almost all the pipeline projects are targeted towards establishing rolling mills for
reinforced bars, hollow sections, etc.
In order to project the supply, the trend of gross value of production at national level is
analyzed. The average growth of actual gross value production at full capacity at current
market price of metal industries, according to the data obtained from Central Statistical
Agency, grew on average by 4% during 2009/10 to 2010/11. As the corrugated iron sheet
manufacturing is classified under this category, it follows similar trend. Hence, assuming
the supply will grow with the above stated average rate, the supply is projected as below.
Table 16: Supply projection based
Project supply in tons
2014 718,782
2015 747,534
2016 777,435
2017 808,533
2018 840,874
The demand supply gap is calculated based on the demand and supply projection made
elsewhere in this document. Table 17indicated the projected demand and supply gap
for corrugated iron sheets in the coming years.
As shown in the table 17 above, there is an ample gap indicating there will be a huge
demand in the years to come. In the future, new entrants may also join the sector because
the demand – supply gap still allows additional investment to the sector. In principle, every
29
Feasibility Study
new entrant is expected to undertake a detailed study to determine its capacity before
joining the sector up to the point where the demand - supply gap requires additional
investment.
In the past, demand is assumed to have been suppressed for a multiple of reasons. The
high level of the construction industry since recent times is a good indication for demand
growth. Additional demand is also expected as a result of better future economic growth in
all sectors.
30
Feasibility Study
4. Marketing Strategy
4.1 Market Strategy
The market strategy refers to the actions that Sea Label plans in response to or in
anticipation of changes in its external environment, its customers, and its competitors.
Weaknesses
Relatively high startup costs that are associated with the investment
Opportunities
The economic development favors increased construction activity, thereby
imposing higher demand for corrugated iron sheets.
There is ample market
Ability to expand during the initial years and that will ensure that the business is
able to rapidly expand and repay its debts on a timely basis.
Favorable economic & demographic situation in Ethiopia.
Threats
Barriers to entry as the working capital requirement are high.
31
Feasibility Study
Focus
Using a focus strategy, Sea Label concentrates on a market area within Ethiopia. The
strength of a focus strategy is derived from knowing the customer and the product
category very well.
Hence, Sea Label’s generic marketing strategy shall rely on focus and differentiation. The
strategy concentrates on creating a market segment and within that segment attempts to
achieve differentiation. The strategy components are defined in the marketing mix
developed for Sea Label.
32
Feasibility Study
(ii) Place: place of sell and appropriate channels are important to reach
customers. The plant will sell its products to reliable agents who can
competitively distribute throughout the country.
(iii) Promotion: this includes all the advertising and selling efforts of the
marketing plan. The company shall participate in trade shows as a way to
promote the company’s products. Television, Radio and newspaper
advertisement will help a lot in promoting the product.
33
Feasibility Study
The envisaged plant will use Galvanized iron coil to produce corrugated iron sheet. Hence,
the plant will import galvanized iron sheets in coil.
34
Feasibility Study
The corrugations are described in terms of pitch (the distance between two crests)
and depth (the height from the top of a crest to the bottom of a trough). It is
important for the pitch and depth to be quite uniform, in order for the sheets to be
easily stackable for transport, and to overlap neatly when making a join. Pitches
have ranged from 25 mm (1 inch) to 125 mm (5 inches). It was once common for
CGI used for vertical walls to have a shorter pitch and depth than roofing CGI. This
shorter pitched material was sometimes called "rippled" instead of "corrugated".
However nowadays, nearly all CGI produced have the same pitch of 3 inches (76.2
mm). The Ethiopian Standards for Corrugated steel sheets is provided below.
Table 19: STANDARDS FOR CORRUGATED IRON SHEETS
Thickness(t) Breadth(b) Length(l) Zinc
Coating Nominal
mass(kg/sheet)
Nominal Tolerance Nominal Tolerance Nominal Tolerance
mm mm mm mm mm mm
g/m2 kg
0.16 +_10% 875 +25, -15 2000 +20, -0 183 2.88
0.20 3.5
0.25 4.29
Source: Ethiopian Standards, Iron & Steel Products, Vol. 25
35
Feasibility Study
Sheet Length
Modern production methods enable corrugated sheet to be produced in lengths
much longer than is usually required. This means that most roofs can be covered in
a single row of sheets, eliminating the need for overlapping joins which are a major
source of corrosion.
These advantages need to be weighed against the change in appearance that full-
length sheets bring. On steeply sloping roofs of short sheets, the joins can be seen
as the shadow line of the overlapping sheet and, less obviously, the additional
nailing needed at the join. These provide a distinct horizontal element to the
appearance of many roofs and their loss may lead to a change in the character of
the roof.
36
Feasibility Study
The corrugations increase the bending strength of the sheet in the direction
perpendicular to the corrugations, but not parallel to them. Normally each sheet is
manufactured longer in its strong direction.
CGI is light weight and easily transported. It was and still is widely used especially in
rural and military buildings such as sheds and water tanks. Its unique properties
were used in the developed countries from the 1840s, and it is still helping
developing countries today.
The corrugations are described in terms of pitch (the distance between two crests)
and depth (the height from the top of a crest to the bottom of a trough). It is
important for the pitch and depth to be quite uniform, in order for the sheets to be
easily stackable for transport, and to overlap neatly when making a join. Pitches
have ranged from 25 mm (1 inch) to 125 mm (5 inches). It was once common for
CGI used for vertical walls to have a shorter pitch and depth than roofing CGI. This
shorter pitched material was sometimes called "rippled" instead of "corrugated".
However nowadays, nearly all CGI produced has the same pitch of 3 inches
(76.2mm).
rainfall is acidic. Corrugated steel roofs can last for many years if protected by a
layer of paint. There are two methods to corrugating iron sheets:
38
Feasibility Study
6.2 Engineering
6.2.1 MACHINERY& EQUIPMENT
Cold roll forming line consists of uncoiler, profiling and cutting machine.
6.3 UTILITIES
The installed electric power is supplied by EEPCO and amount depends on the total power
required by all machineries and equipment selected for the establishment of the plant.
The specification of the supply shall adhere to most updated international standards
and best engineering practice. And finally the power factor corrector should be
considered during the implementation. Based on their capacity the power needs for
each product are listed below
39
Feasibility Study
7. ORGANIZATION& MANAGEMENT
7.1 GENERAL
The proposed corrugated iron sheet factory performs well when it employs an efficient and
smooth organizational structure that allows flexibility and ease of communication among
departments. The proposed structure considered different manufacturing sections and is
designed to achieve:
Well planned and effective Organizational support, and
The organizational structure and manpower requirement takes into account the available
manpower strength and their experience.
7.1.1 GENERAL MANAGEMENT
The day to day activities of the project will be managed and undertaken by a higher
professional manager who has an extensive and rich experience in the technology,
production and marketing of steel products. The manager will be responsible for the
overall planning, organizing, supervising and controlling of the factory. He will be
supported by two department managers, namely operation and Administration, Marketing
&Finance departments, all of which having distinct delegation of accountability and
responsibility. He will report to advisory board and receive guidance on overall
management of the Factory.
The Internal Auditor is in charge to follow each and every activity of the Factory including
all working process and device a system to avoid incorrect practices after having the
approval from the General Manager. The copy of the report of the Internal Auditor should
be sent to Advisory board.
The Operation department manager will be responsible for product mix design, production
plan, smooth production and plant operation as well as timely well managed maintenance
activities. He will be supported by the production section and technical section heads.
40
Feasibility Study
The project offers competitive salary based on the existing labor market in the industry,
especially to those who assume the managerial positions as to recruit competent
personnel from the open labor market.
41
Feasibility Study
Advisory Board
General Manager
Internl Auditor
Factory
Plant Operation Marketing Administrtion
Maintenance Finance Section
Section Section Section
Section
42
Feasibility Study
7.2 Staffing
The following shows average salaries and wages of the personnel during CGIS factory
operation based on present bases and labor market estimate.
7.3 Training
Training of the required manpower for the project has to be planned well in advance. The key
personnel should be selected and trained suitably. The training may be carried out in the
following manner:
43
Feasibility Study
The Training of the key operating Personnel operators should be suitably carried out during
the construction, erection and operation phases in addition to training them by visits to
similar operational plants.
Sub Total
21,022,719 14,279,189 35,301,908
44
Feasibility Study
Financial return analysis indicates that the project will generate an acceptable internal rate of
return. The internal rate of return (IRR) after tax for the project is 68 percent.
45
Feasibility Study
2 Revenue
46
Feasibility Study
3 Costs
3.1. Raw material Requirement and Cost
The raw material required for the production of Corrugated Galvanized Iron Sheets (CGIS) is coiled galvanized iron
Summary Revenue
Year Total Revenue
1 116,809,744
2 140,171,693
3 163,533,642
47
Feasibility Study
4 Cost of Manpower
direct labor: 693,000
5 Marketing Expense
Cost of Spare
Project Year Percentage Part
1 to 5 1% 40,946
6 to 10 2% 81,892
7 Utiilties
Description Cost
Electricity & water 1,000,000
PTT 40,000
Total Cost 1,040,000
8 Insurance
The annual insurance rate for fire, lightening, floud etc is assumed as 1.5% for building and machinery and 4% for vehicle
Total Cost of
Description Insurance Rate Insurance
Building and Machinery 1.5% 2,722,965
Total 2,722,965
Annual
Description Depreciation Rate Investment Cost Depreciation
Land 2.5% - -
Building and Civil Work 5% 3,869,587 193,479
Machinery 20% 5,284,602 1,056,920
Other Fixed Cost 20% 225,000 45,000
Pre Production Cost 20% 1,500,000 300,000
Pre Production Interest
(Accrued Interest) 10% - -
Total Depreciation per annum 1,595,400
Birr
1 Euro 27
1 USD 21
48
Feasibility Study
CGISLIne
Total 3,869,587
Total 3,869,587
2 Machinery
CGIS
Total cost in Birr 5,284,602
Grand total 5,284,602
3 Other Fixed Assests
Description Cost
Office Equipment 75,000
Office Furnitures 150,000
Total Cost 225,000
Description Cost
Pre-investment studies & Others 1,500,000
Total 1,500,000
49
Feasibility Study
Sales Revenue 116,809,744 140,171,693 163,533,642 171,710,324 180,295,840 189,310,632 198,776,163 208,714,972 219,150,720 230,108,256
Plant capacity 50% 60% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70%
Direct Materials & Input 88,820,439 106,324,340 123,832,577 130,024,206 136,525,416 143,351,687 150,519,271 158,045,235 165,947,496 174,244,871
Material Cost 87,085,859 104,503,031 121,920,202 128,016,213 134,417,023 141,137,874 148,194,768 155,604,506 163,384,732 171,553,968
raw material 87,085,859 104,503,031 121,920,202 128,016,213 134,417,023 141,137,874 148,194,768 155,604,506 163,384,732 171,553,968
Labor and staff 693,000 727,650 764,033 802,234 842,346 884,463 928,686 975,121 1,023,877 1,075,070
Labor and staff benefit 41,580 43,659 45,842 48,134 50,541 53,068 55,721 58,507 61,433 64,504
Utilities 1,000,000 1,050,000 1,102,500 1,157,625 1,215,506 1,276,282 1,340,096 1,407,100 1,477,455 1,551,328
Plant Overhead Costs 40,946 40,946 40,946 40,946 40,946 81,892 81,892 81,892 81,892 81,892
spare parts & maint. 40,946 40,946 40,946 40,946 40,946 81,892 81,892 81,892 81,892 81,892
Plant Cost 88,861,385 106,365,286 123,873,523 130,065,152 136,566,362 143,433,579 150,601,163 158,127,126 166,029,388 174,326,763
Administration & Selling Expenses 6,287,258 6,991,116 7,695,125 7,943,733 8,204,771 8,478,861 8,766,656 9,068,841 9,386,134 9,719,293
administration expenses 5,119,160 5,589,399 6,059,788 6,226,629 6,401,813 6,585,755 6,778,894 6,981,691 7,194,627 7,418,210
Professional Expense 20,000 21,000 22,050 23,153 24,310 25,526 26,802 28,142 29,549 31,027
Stationary & P.T.T 40,000 42,000 44,100 46,305 48,620 51,051 53,604 56,284 59,098 62,053
Insurance 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965 2,722,965
selling expenses 1,168,097 1,401,717 1,635,336 1,717,103 1,802,958 1,893,106 1,987,762 2,087,150 2,191,507 2,301,083
Promotional Expense 1,168,097 1,401,717 1,635,336 1,717,103 1,802,958 1,893,106 1,987,762 2,087,150 2,191,507 2,301,083
Operating Costs 95,148,642 113,356,402 131,568,647 138,008,884 144,771,133 151,912,440 159,367,819 167,195,967 175,415,522 184,046,056
Depreciation & Ammortization 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400
Total Production Cost 96,744,042 114,951,801 133,164,047 139,604,284 146,366,533 153,507,840 160,963,219 168,791,367 177,010,922 185,641,455
Earning After Tax (EAT) 12,662,263 16,518,537 20,397,452 21,915,544 23,525,823 25,061,955 26,469,061 27,946,523 29,497,859 31,126,761
50
Feasibility Study
Coverage Inv't Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year6 Year7 Year8 YeaR9 Year10
CURRENT ASSETS
Accounts Recievable 30 7,929,054 7,929,054 9,446,367 10,964,054 11,500,740 12,064,261 12,659,370 13,280,652 13,932,997 14,617,960 15,337,171
Inventory 23,323,587 23,323,587 27,976,143 32,628,773 34,258,287 35,969,276 37,766,497 39,652,863 41,633,547 43,713,265 45,896,969
Raw Material
imported raw material 90 21,771,465 21,771,465 26,125,758 30,480,051 32,004,053 33,604,256 35,284,469 37,048,692 38,901,127 40,846,183 42,888,492
Work-in-progress 1 246,837 246,837 295,459 344,093 361,292 379,351 398,427 418,337 439,242 461,193 484,241
Finished Products 5 1,305,285 1,305,285 1,554,926 1,804,629 1,892,941 1,985,669 2,083,602 2,185,834 2,293,178 2,405,889 2,524,236
Cash in hand(Pitty cash) 15 510,566 510,566 545,590 580,906 597,546 615,017 635,069 654,331 674,557 695,794 718,092
Total Current Assets 31,763,207 31,763,207 37,968,100 44,173,733 46,356,573 48,648,554 51,060,936 53,587,845 56,241,101 59,027,019 61,952,232
Increase in current Assets 6,204,893 6,205,633 2,182,840 2,291,982 2,526,910 2,653,255 2,785,918 2,925,214
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable 30 7,340,488 7,340,488 8,796,086 10,251,892 10,764,486 11,302,711 11,867,846 12,461,239 13,084,301 13,738,516 14,425,441
Increase in current liabilities 1,455,598 1,455,806 512,595 538,224 593,392 623,062 654,215 686,926
WORKING CAPITAL
Net working Capital 24,422,719 24,422,719 29,172,014 33,921,841 35,592,086 37,345,843 39,193,089 41,126,607 43,156,800 45,288,503 47,526,791
Increase in workng capital 24,422,719 - 4,749,296 4,749,827 1,670,245 1,753,757 1,847,246 1,933,517 2,030,193 2,131,703 2,238,288
51
Feasibility Study
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year6 Year7 Year8 Year9 Year10
CASH INFLOWS
Net Profit 12,662,263 16,518,537 20,397,452 21,915,544 23,525,823 25,061,955 26,469,061 27,946,523 29,497,859 31,126,761
Depreciation & amortization 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400 1,595,400
Total Cash Inflows 35,301,908 14,257,663 18,113,937 21,992,852 23,510,944 25,121,223 26,657,354 28,064,461 29,541,923 31,093,258 32,722,160
Cash Outflows
Working Capital 24,422,719 - 4,749,296 4,749,827 1,670,245 1,753,757 1,847,246 1,933,517 2,030,193 2,131,703 2,238,288
Pre-production Cost
1,500,000
& interest
Replacement 225,000
Tax Payable 5,426,684 7,079,373 8,741,765 9,392,376 10,082,495 10,740,838 11,343,883 11,977,081 12,641,939
Total Cash Outflows 35,301,908 3,417,433 13,948,187 15,993,011 15,008,078 16,444,332 11,929,741 12,674,355 13,374,077 14,108,784 14,880,227
Net Cash Flow - 10,840,229 4,165,750 5,999,841 8,502,865 8,676,890 14,727,613 15,390,106 16,167,846 16,984,474 17,841,933
Cum. Cash Balance - 10,840,229 15,005,979 21,005,820 29,508,686 38,185,576 52,913,189 68,303,295 84,471,141 101,455,615 119,297,548
*Investment on second phase of the project (Galvanizing plant) will be started after 2 years of operation as back ward integration.
52
Feasibility Study
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash Balance 10,840,229 15,005,979 21,005,820 29,508,686 38,185,576 52,913,189 68,303,295 84,471,141 101,455,615 119,297,548
Current assets 31,763,207 31,763,207 37,968,100 44,173,733 46,356,573 48,648,554 51,060,936 53,587,845 56,241,101 59,027,019 61,952,232
Total Current Assets 31,763,207 42,603,436 52,974,079 65,179,553 75,865,258 86,834,130 103,974,125 121,891,140 140,712,242 160,482,634 181,249,780
FIXED ASSETS
Building and construction 3,869,587 3,676,108 3,482,628 3,289,149 3,095,670 2,902,190 2,708,711 2,515,232 2,321,752 2,128,273 1,934,794
Machineries and
5,284,602 4,227,682 3,170,761 2,113,841 1,056,920 - (1,056,920) (2,113,841) (3,170,761) (4,227,682) (5,284,602)
Equipment
Vehicles -
Office Furniture and
225,000 180,000 135,000 90,000 45,000 225,000 180,000 135,000 90,000 45,000 -
Equipment
Total Fixed Assets 9,379,189 8,083,789 6,788,390 5,492,990 4,197,590 3,127,190 1,831,791 536,391 (759,009) (2,054,409) (3,349,809)
Pre-Production Cost &
1,500,000 1,200,000 900,000 600,000 300,000 - (300,000) (600,000) (900,000) (1,200,000) (1,500,000)
Interest
Land lease - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Assets 42,642,396 51,887,225 60,662,469 71,272,543 80,362,848 89,961,320 105,505,915 121,827,531 139,053,233 157,228,225 176,399,972
LIABILITIES:
Current liablities 7,340,488 7,340,488 8,796,086 10,251,892 10,764,486 11,302,711 11,867,846 12,461,239 13,084,301 13,738,516 14,425,441
Tax Payable 5,426,684 7,079,373 8,741,765 9,392,376 10,082,495 10,740,838 11,343,883 11,977,081 12,641,939 13,340,040
Sub Total 28,363,207 30,372,457 29,708,537 28,662,924 25,230,062 21,385,206 22,608,684 23,805,122 25,061,382 26,380,455 27,765,482
CAPITAL:
Owner's Equity 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189 14,279,189
Retained Earnings 7,235,579 16,674,743 28,330,430 40,853,598 54,296,925 68,618,042 83,743,220 99,712,662 116,568,581 134,355,301
Sub total 14,279,189 21,514,768 30,953,932 42,609,619 55,132,787 68,576,114 82,897,231 98,022,409 113,991,851 130,847,770 148,634,490
Total Liabil.& Capital 42,642,396 51,887,225 60,662,469 71,272,543 80,362,848 89,961,320 105,505,915 121,827,531 139,053,233 157,228,225 176,399,972
53
Feasibility Study
BENEFIT
Revenue 116,809,744 140,171,693 163,533,642 171,710,324 180,295,840 189,310,632 198,776,163 208,714,972 219,150,720 230,108,256
Total benefit - 116,809,744 140,171,693 163,533,642 171,710,324 180,295,840 189,310,632 198,776,163 208,714,972 219,150,720 274,285,239
COST
Investment 35,301,908
Replacement costs
Operating cost less Dep. 95,148,642 113,356,402 131,568,647 138,008,884 144,771,133 151,912,440 159,367,819 167,195,967 175,415,522 184,046,056
Income tax 8,741,765 9,392,376 10,082,495 10,740,838 11,343,883 11,977,081 12,641,939 13,340,040
Total cost 35,301,908 95,148,642 113,356,402 140,310,413 147,401,260 154,853,628 162,653,277 170,711,702 179,173,048 188,057,462 197,386,096
Net benefit (35,301,908) 21,661,102 26,815,291 23,223,229 24,309,064 25,442,212 26,657,354 28,064,461 29,541,923 31,093,258 76,899,143
FIRR 68%
NPV 105,207,181
54
Feasibility Study
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year7 Year8 Year9 Year10
BENEFIT
Revenue 110,969,257 133,163,108 155,356,960 163,124,807 171,281,048 179,845,100 188,837,355 198,279,223 208,193,184 218,602,843
Total benefit - 110,969,257 133,163,108 155,356,960 163,124,807 171,281,048 179,845,100 188,837,355 198,279,223 208,193,184 262,779,826
COST
Investment 35,301,908
Replacement costs
Operating cost less Dep. 95,148,642 113,356,402 131,568,647 138,008,884 144,771,133 151,912,440 159,367,819 167,195,967 175,415,522 184,046,056
Income tax 8,741,765 9,392,376 10,082,495 10,740,838 11,343,883 11,977,081 12,641,939 13,340,040
Total cost 35,301,908 95,148,642 113,356,402 140,310,413 147,401,260 154,853,628 162,653,277 170,711,702 179,173,048 188,057,462 197,386,096
Net benefit (35,301,908) 15,820,614 19,806,706 15,046,547 15,723,547 16,427,420 17,191,823 18,125,653 19,106,175 20,135,722 65,393,730
FIRR 48%
NPV 62,863,138
55
Feasibility Study
Cost increase by 5%
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year7 Year8 Year9 Year10
BENEFIT
Revenue 116,809,744 140,171,693 163,533,642 171,710,324 180,295,840 189,310,632 198,776,163 208,714,972 219,150,720 230,108,256
Total benefit - 116,809,744 140,171,693 163,533,642 171,710,324 180,295,840 189,310,632 198,776,163 208,714,972 219,150,720 274,285,239
COST
Investment 35,301,908
Replacement costs
Operating cost less Dep. 99,906,075 119,024,222 138,147,080 144,909,328 152,009,689 159,508,062 167,336,210 175,555,765 184,186,299 193,248,359
Income tax 8,741,765 9,392,376 10,082,495 10,740,838 11,343,883 11,977,081 12,641,939 13,340,040
Total cost 35,301,908 99,906,075 119,024,222 140,310,413 154,301,704 162,092,185 170,248,899 178,680,093 187,532,847 196,828,238 206,588,399
Net benefit (35,301,908) 16,903,669 21,147,471 23,223,229 17,408,619 18,203,655 19,061,732 20,096,070 21,182,125 22,322,482 67,696,840
FIRR 55%
NPV 75,460,291
56
Feasibility Study
57
Feasibility Study
Year 1 21,022,719
st
1 Quarter 822,979 525,568 1,348,547 20,199,739
2nd Quarter 843,554 504,993 1,348,547 19,356,186
3rd Quarter 864,642 483,905 1,348,547 18,491,544
th
4 Quarter 886,258 462,289 1,348,547 17,605,285
3,417,433 1,976,755 5,394,188 17,605,285
Year 2
1st Quarter 908,415 440,132 1,348,547 16,696,870
2nd Quarter 931,125 417,422 1,348,547 15,765,745
rd
3 Quarter 954,403 394,144 1,348,547 14,811,341
4th Quarter 978,263 370,284 1,348,547 13,833,078
3,772,207 1,621,981 5,394,188 13,833,078
Year 3
1st Quarter 1,002,720 345,827 1,348,547 12,830,358
2nd Quarter 1,027,788 320,759 1,348,547 11,802,570
rd
3 Quarter 1,053,483 295,064 1,348,547 10,749,087
th
4 Quarter 1,079,820 268,727 1,348,547 9,669,267
4,163,811 1,230,377 5,394,188 9,669,267
Year 4
1st Quarter 1,106,815 241,732 1,348,547 8,562,452
2nd Quarter 1,134,486 214,061 1,348,547 7,427,966
rd
3 Quarter 1,162,848 185,699 1,348,547 6,265,118
4th Quarter 1,191,919 156,628 1,348,547 5,073,199
4,596,068 798,120 5,394,188 5,073,199
Year 5
1st Quarter 1,221,717 126,830 1,348,547 3,851,482
2nd Quarter 1,252,260 96,287 1,348,547 2,599,222
3rd Quarter 1,283,566 64,981 1,348,547 1,315,656
th
4 Quarter 1,315,656 32,891 1,348,547 (0)
5,073,199 320,989 5,394,188 (0)
58