Core Banking Solution For US Community Banks, Credit Unioins - Banking
Core Banking Solution For US Community Banks, Credit Unioins - Banking
Core Banking Solution For US Community Banks, Credit Unioins - Banking
Community Banks
Authors
Shankar Sundaramoorthy
Practice Head - Banking Practice
&
Prashant Kumar
Associate Consultant - Banking Practice
Page 1 of 15
Table of Contents
1. Objective .................................................................................................................. 3
2. Core Banking Solutions for Small Banks ............................................................. 4
3. Community Bank..................................................................................................... 4
4. Credit Unions........................................................................................................... 5
5. Core Banking Solutions for Small Banks in depth .............................................. 9
6. Functional Coverage of the Core Banking Solutions .......................................... 9
7. Technical Coverage of the Core Banking Solution............................................ 11
8. Other Features of the Core Banking Solutions .................................................. 11
9. Viability of Using ASP / SaaS model in core banking implementation ............ 14
10. Market Potential for SaaS / ASP model ........................................................... 14
11. Conclusion......................................................................................................... 15
Page 2 of 15
1. Objective
• To compare the nature of business and products offered by US Community banks and
banks.
• To study the viability of offering core banking solution on ASP model aimed at community
banks.
Page 3 of 15
2. Core Banking Solutions for Small Banks
Core banking is another way of saying the core functions of a bank. These functions represent
the essential (core) business of banking. Because of the plethora of services banks now provide,
it is easy to forget that the root of banking is accepting deposits and lending money. The definition
of core banking may have been muddied by the emergence of packaged computer solutions
which combine core banking functions with other elements of a bank’s operations but at the most
basic level core banking manages financial transactions and their impact on the accounts of its
customers.
Core banking solutions for small banks are those solutions where more than 80% of the banks
using the platform have less than US$1 billion in assets.
Core Banking for Small banks focuses primarily on Community Banks and Credit unions.
3. Community Bank
Community bank is locally owned and operated commercial bank. It derives its sources of funds
from, and it lends money to, the community where it operates, and is not affiliated with a
multibank holding company. According to the FDIC, community banks comprise most of the
commercial banks in the US, numbering 3,771 at the end of 2007. Not all community banks will
be restricted to a specific geographic area (for e.g. community first bank shares), hence a
common applicable definition is difficult. Generally most studies on US banking define community
banks on the basis of the nature of clientele (small business), geographic reach (generally
restricted to a particular region), size (less than $1 Billion) and different parameters applied to
provide loans (more personal than statistical data is relied on).
Products
Community Bank provides full Business Banking services including Commercial Lending, Leasing
and additional services ranging from Financial Planning to Wills.
1. Community banks focus attention on the needs of local families, businesses, and
farmers. Conversely, many of the nation's mega banks are structured to place a
priority on serving large corporations.
2. Unlike many larger banks that may take deposits in one state and lend in others,
community banks channel most of their loans to the neighborhoods where their
depositors live and work, helping to keep local communities vibrant and growing.
3. Community bank officers are generally accessible to their customers on site. CEOs at
mega banks are often headquartered in office suites, away from daily customer
dealings.
4. Community bank officers are typically deeply involved in local community affairs,
while large bank officers are likely to be detached physically and emotionally from the
communities where their branches are located.
5. Many community banks are willing to consider character, family history and
discretionary spending in making loans. Mega banks, on the other hand, often apply
Page 4 of 15
impersonal qualification criteria, such as credit scoring, to all loan decisions without
regard to individual circumstances.
6. Community banks offer nimble decision-making on business loans, because
decisions are made locally. Mega banks must often convene loan approval
committees in another state.
7. Because community banks are themselves small businesses, they understand the
needs of small business owners. Their core concern is lending to small businesses
and farms. The core concern of the mega bank is corporate
4. Credit Unions
The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is the federal agency that charters and
supervises federal credit unions. They also insure savings in federal and most state-chartered
credit unions across the country through the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund
(NCUSIF), a federal fund backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government.
Classifications of bank
The banks in US are generally differentiated based on the size of the deposits held. The
classification is provided below;
A credit union may fall under any of the four definitions based on its size of deposits. Majority of
them are small in size and hence will come under community banks. The difference between a
general bank and credit union is defined by the shareholding. Credit unions are required to
ensure that its clientele become shareholders of the bank.
Products
Credit unions will typically offer the same products and services as larger banks. However, some
credit unions will choose not to offer every product and service out there. The reason is that these
credit unions do not do the same amount of volume that larger banks do. Banks can afford to
have “loss-leaders” or products that get customers in the door. Credit unions will more likely only
offer the products and services that a large portion of the membership is likely to use.
There are many significant differences between credit unions to banks. Credit unions promote the
financial well-being of members, including those of modest means, through a system that is
cooperative, member-owned, volunteer directed and not-for-profit. Unlike banks, credit unions
Page 5 of 15
exist solely to serve their members, not to pay high dividends to an outside group of stockholders.
Credit union income is returned to members and that's why credit unions can offer higher interest
rates on deposits and lower rates on loans.
STRUCTURE
Credit Unions / Community Bank Banks
o Banks are for-profit, board and
o Credit Unions are member-owned, not-for- stockholder controlled, financial corporations
profit financial cooperatives o Stockholders hold influence in the bank
o Credit Unions operate under a one based on the total value of their stocks
member, one vote system o Customers of a bank who are not
o Most credit unions have volunteer, unpaid stockholders do not own a financial interest in
boards the bank
o Earnings of credit unions are returned to o Boards are compensated for their
members in the form of higher interest rates on service
deposit accounts and lower loan rates (minus o Profits of banks are divided among the
operating expenses) stockholders (minus operating expenses)
TAXES
Credit Unions / Community Bank Banks
Page 6 of 15
MEMBERSHIP
Credit Unions / Community Bank Banks
o Under federal and state laws, credit unions
may only offer membership to individuals who
belong to a select group. Other credit unions'
field of membership is defined by geographic o Banks face no restrictions on who they
boundaries. serve
Difference between Credit Union and Other Financial institution are mentioned below.
Page 7 of 15
The following figure depicts the banking market segmentation by a focus on receiving deposits or
making loans
The Credit Union Segment Is More Highly Fragmented Than Most Other Banking Segments
The market structure of banking depends on the segment. For instance, the credit union market is
highly fragmented, with the top 20 credit unions comprising just 15% of total credit union
revenues. Other banking segments, such as the credit card issuance or sales financing segments
are more highly concentrated. And despite the pressures on profits of the subprime crisis, the
commercial banking sector was the sixth most profitable industry in the 2008 Fortune 500 ranking,
reflecting 12.6% profit, based on 2007 revenues
Page 8 of 15
The following statistics shows that the top eight commercial banks own 42% of the commercial
banking market.
This section of the report deals with in-depth knowledge about each solution. The following
organization offering core banking solution in US are taken into account.
1. FIS - Horizon
2. Fiserv - AFTECH
3. Harland Financial Solutions - Phoenix
4. Metavante - IBS
5. Open Solutions - TCBS
6. Jack Henry - Core Director
The analysis of the Core banking solution is done on the following criteria’s.
1. Functional Coverage
2. Technical Coverage
The functional analysis of the core banking solution is done broadly on the following criteria.
1. Payments
2. Account and Cash Management
3. Loans (Including mortgages)
Page 9 of 15
Payments
Cash
Current Saving Term Withdraw/ FX in Bank Travellers
Company Solution Accounts Accounts Deposits Deposits Cash Cheques Cheques
Fidelity Horizon
Fiserv AFTECH
Harland
Financial
Solutions Phoenix
Metavante IBS
Open
Solutions TCBS
Core
Jack Henry Director
Overdraft
on
Current Personal Revolving Mortgage
Company Solution Guarantees Account Loans Facility Loans
Fidelity Horizon
Fiserv AFTECH
Harland
Financial
Solutions Phoenix
Metavante IBS
Open
Solutions TCBS
Core
Jack Henry Director
Page 10 of 15
7. Technical Coverage of the Core Banking Solution
Core Banking
Systems Hardware Platform Supported Databases Supported
SQL
Mainframe Unix Windows DB2 Oracle Server Other
Horizon
AFTECH
Phoenix
IBS
TCBS
Core Director
MetaVante - IBS
Multi-currency No
Multi-Lingual No
Metavante Enterprise Contact Management, Metavante
CRM Functionality Relationship Profitability.
Fidelity - Horizon
Page 11 of 15
Summary of all your customers and their relationships,
Unlimited addressing and correspondence delivery options,
Tracking of customers’ collateral, User-defined information
Integrated Relationship and notes, Database management (Tools to automate file
Management clean-up)
Account setup is fully automated, including all document
preparation, Automate the administration of rewards and
Integrated Deposit Management customer affinity programs
Loan setup is fully automated, Automated reporting to multiple
Integrated Loan Management credit bureaus, Mortgage servicing application,
Tax Reporting, Security, Report management, Document
Integrated Service Management imaging
Page 12 of 15
PhoenixXM connectivity; Date tickler system – set up
reminders on a customer or account level; Customer
profitability analysis; Context sensitive online help; Audit
confirmations; Fast account searches from one convenient
window – search by customer name, account number, social
security number or telephone number; Unlimited customizable
fields in each application; Branch banking; ODBC compliant
MSSQL or Sybase; Safe deposit boxes; Flexible parameters
for system customization; Customizable notices; Maintenance
history – display a complete history of all changes to an
account since it was opened; View interest rates for all
System Tools account types from one convenient window
Fiserv – AFTECH
Page 13 of 15
9. Viability of Using ASP / SaaS model in core banking implementation
Organizations, both large and small, are increasingly outsourcing their applications to application
service providers (ASPs) for a variety of reasons such as cost reduction, shortened time-to-
market, lack of internal expertise, and risk reduction. However, the adoption of the ASP / SaaS
model has not been smooth sailing for many organizations, and only a few organizations have a
formal approach to making ASP / SaaS outsourcing decisions. Partially to fill this void, develops a
value-driven approach to outsourcing using ASP /SaaS based on outsourcing theories and the
industry’s best practices. The various advantages and disadvantages of using ASP / SaaS
models are mentioned below.
Advantages:
1. Specialization. Expert resources are increasingly becoming a rarity across all industries.
ASPs expertly and cost-effectively build personnel and equipment resources, focusing on the
very business aspects their customers need to address.
2. Broad marketability. Specialization in a certain facet of business can oftentimes be spread
across parallel market opportunities. Many common business functions such as word
processing, database management and personnel resource management have cross-
industry outreach. In these areas, ASPs can reconfigure consumer applications and services
with industry-specific flavors to send packages targeted at multiple channels.
3. Repackaging other ASPs. Applying the value-added reseller scheme to the hosted
applications market opens up even more diverse solution sets. The opportunity to wholesale
others' services or ASP offerings for a comfortable profit margin has strategically positioned
many ASPs already.
4. Consistent, predictable revenue. Even in new or volatile markets, with an established
customer base, ASPs can effectively track past revenues and plan for anticipated growth
oftentimes much more reliably than providers offering only licensed-based software that sells
in peaks and valleys.
Disadvantages:
1. Ownership of critical client functions. Building a business that clients can trust with
mission-critical functions such as database warehousing, data security and client
management can be a challenge for upstart ASPs.
2. High service-level expectations. ASP clients tolerate next-to-no slippage in service.
Always-on applications, responsive customer service, and high online throughput are
measures of service providers' success.
According to McKinsey & Co. adoption of the model has been growing at well over 20% year over
year, and is set to explode. Around 61 percent of CIOs at North American companies with sales
over $1 billion are already planning to adopt one or more SaaS application.
Page 14 of 15
Deutsche Bank projected that the SaaS market will account for half of the application software
spend by 2013.
Analysts, the world over, predict that up to 30% of all software applications are expected to be
delivered through this mode in the coming years.
11. Conclusion
1. Detailed study of the core banking solution is required to identify the right product for small
banks in US.
2. Core banking solution deployment in a particular geography or with a specific line of function
like deposit / payment products only, is another solution fast emerging as SaaS-able.
3. Metavante, Fiserv, Jack Henry, Fidelity, Harland and Open solutions can be considered for a
demo in that order. Metavante would be the right fit as they claim to have a 100% ASP model,
the details from other vendors on this front is not publicly available.
Page 15 of 15