Chapter 4 - The Whole Health Process - 2018 - Integrative Medicine
Chapter 4 - The Whole Health Process - 2018 - Integrative Medicine
Chapter 4 - The Whole Health Process - 2018 - Integrative Medicine
We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
ALBERT EINSTEIN
VALUE OVER VOLUME over time. Ideally, this approach recruits the self-healing
mechanisms possessed by all living beings. When the
As health care spending in the US surpasses three trillion self-healing potential is tapped, there will be less need
dollars a year, there is a push to shift the focus of health for costly and potentially harmful interventions, be they
care delivery away from volume and toward increased pharmaceuticals, surgery, or acupuncture needles. How
value by improving quality at less cost. This “Value over is this value most efficiently obtained? We start by asking
Volume” approach is quickly changing reimbursement each patient to explore what matters to them most and
models and encouraging health care systems to create then to define his or her own health goals.
new models of care.1 Organizing resources around patients’ self-defined
This evolution honors the advances achieved using health goals is the most efficient way to motivate sustain-
the biomedical model while at the same time enhanc- able behavior change. These goals are those most rele-
ing it with a much needed transition away from a reac- vant within the context of people’s lives, so they are much
tive, disease-centric approach toward one that prioritizes more likely to foster patient engagement and adherence
improving health outcomes. New approaches place to the plan of care. This approach shifts our focus from
greater importance on patient engagement, highlight asking, “what’s the matter with you” to “what matters to
health promotion, and place care within the context of you.”
each individual.
One of the most important ways to enhance value is
to strategically tailor health care resources according to INNOVATIVE HEALTH SYSTEMS
the context of each person’s life. Ongoing, relationship-
centered care allows the clinician to understand what sort After more than 50 years of treatment by the Indian
of person has a disease (to paraphrase Osler) instead of Health Services, more than 60,000 Alaska Native and
simply focusing on what disease the person has. This con- American Indians living in Southcentral Alaska became
text helps explain why there is a predicted 15-fold return the owners of their own health care system, the South-
on investment when health systems have a strong primary central Alaska Foundation. Known as the Nuka System
care foundation.2 of Care,6 the system focuses on establishing long-term,
trusting, accountable relationships built upon a shared-
decision model where the patient’s health goals are pri-
PATIENT-DEFINED GOALS mary.7,8 After implementation in 1999, urgent care and
emergency department use decreased by 40%, specialist
To improve health outcomes, goals that drive clinical use decreased by 50%, and hospitalization days decreased
care must arise from the individual or community that is by 30%.9 Blood sugar and blood pressure control
served. This structure requires that we work beyond the improved,10 and customer satisfaction data showed that
traditional biomedical model that has been directed by 91% of customer-owners rated their care as “favorable.”7
physician-dominated dialogue. In this model, patients and their families are the principal
Research on contextual errors has shown that even drivers of health, which has reduced dependence on the
when clinicians are told by a patient that “I can’t afford health system (Fig. 4.1).
my asthma medication,” 50% of physicians will prescribe The Nuka strategy resulted in significant improve-
it anyway.3,4 Often the clinician will “do the right thing” ments in the health of a population that was at high risk
according to the evidence protocol for a condition that is for disease. A similar high-risk population is American
concrete instead of working the evidence into the context Veterans. A conventional biomedical model that places
of someone’s real life, which is more complex than gen- the patient in a passive role as they receive treatments for
eral guidelines can accommodate (Table 4.1). symptoms and disease states does not serve Veterans (or
A better balance is needed to combine the scientific, other Americans) well. Such a model risks the potential
biomedical model by artfully adapting it to be as rele- harm of polypharmacy while not recruiting the person’s
vant and useful as possible to the person being treated.5 active participation in their health.11 In 2012, The Office
Doing so will ensure patient adherence to a plan of care of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transforma-
that emphasizes what is needed most to change behavior tion (OPCCCT) was created to bring needed change to
27
28 PART I Integrative Medicine
Community
Working
your body
es
Power of Energy and Surroundings
ch
the mind flexibility
roa
Physical and
ap p
Relaxing and
emotional
ention and treatment
healing
d complementary
Mindful
Personal
Spirit and soul
development
Growing and Me
Personal life and
connecting
work life
Aw
areness
a l an
Prev
ti o n
and coworkers
Nourishing and
n
nve
Relationship Recharge fueling
Co
Sleep and
refresh
Me + Self
care + Professional
care + Community = Whole
health
the most challenging. If framed correctly, it can connect and death is much less likely to change their behavior
people to their personal meaning, getting to the heart of than the person who wants to stop smoking because
a personalized, proactive, and patient-driven approach. the daughter they love recently developed asthma. The
The first question is at the center of the Fig. 4.2, the hemoglobin (Hgb) A1c test may just be an abstract idea,
mindful awareness of ME. while the fear of losing one’s eyesight or requiring dialy-
sis may be much more real. Eliciting emotional reasons
for change is much more effective than recruiting cogni-
Question #1, What? tive reasoning.
Experience in asking this question has provided valu-
What Gives Your Life Meaning?
able lessons. Many people initially may not understand
This question can be asked in a number of different ways, the question or may say, “I don’t know, you’re the doctor,
but the goal of the question is to connect the individual you tell me.” Providing context before asking the ques-
to what is most important. Without this connection, even tion can help with comprehension. Consider the follow-
a health goal that is defined by the individual will most ing script:
likely be unsustainable. This deeper exploration helps
to discover the underlying motivational driver that can In our clinic we are shifting focus from what is wrong with
allow for sustainable healthy behaviors.13,14 For example, you to a process that helps us understand what you want
a smoker whose clinician informs them of the evidence your health for. This way we can use the resources of the
linking smoking to increased risk of cancer, heart disease, health system to help you live your fullest life. Achieving
30 PART I Integrative Medicine
What matters to you? such an event is a great opportunity but also a signifi-
cant shift. This exploration can be further supported
by self-reflection tools or group approaches outside of
s
me
e y the clinical encounter.
ng ilit
tco
nt ha nab
ou
e n c
at ters erm ati
o
vio
r ai
st
hy
at m pow tiv
Mo ha Su Other Versions of Question 1 Include
alt
Wh Em B e
He
What really matters to you?
vs. For what do you want your health?
Why do you want to be healthy or improve your health?
What is a health goal that will help you connect to what
is most meaningful in your life?
you willing to do today to make your health better?” can follow up with other members of the team? The quest
write the health plan itself. for health is lifelong, and you can show them possible
You, as the clinician, also have a place at the center. routes that they can follow along the way.
One of the most powerful ways to understand this process
is to apply it to your own life. Clinician self-care matters.
You may find that you learn a great deal by applying this
entire process to your own individualized care needs. For THE VALUE OF THE WHOLE HEALTH
what do you want your health? And you might just find PROCESS
that this process gives you a kick-start that reconnects
you to meaning in your work. The Whole Health process incorporates key ingredi-
ents that promote sustainable health outcomes, as shown
in Figs. 4.2 and 4.3. Patients sit in the driver’s seat and
clarify, with support, which areas are most important to
FOUR-STEP PROCESS FOR HEALTH them. This process is not only empowering but also acti-
PLANNING vates their innate capacity to heal, tapping into the wis-
dom within each of us.
Largely due to the efforts of the VA facilities in the Bos- The value of this approach has become increasingly
ton area, a pragmatic process for health planning has clear through recent research. For example, many people
been developed.15 This process involves four steps, which choose “Power of the Mind” as an area of focus on the
may not all happen at once: Circle of Health because of the high levels of perceived
1. Assessment. Gathering information—and doing it stress in their lives. Self-care in this area can result in
in a different way—is critical. Yes, if the patient is significant cost savings. In a 2015 study, 4452 subjects
being seen for a specific concern, you should have were taught mind–body skills to reduce stress and build
that in mind. Rarely, someone will not want you resiliency. After following this cohort for 4.2 years, those
to use this approach; fair enough—respecting their who completed the training had a 43% overall reduc-
choice is a way to personalize care. However, if they tion in the use of health-related care than did the 13,149
are willing, asking the three questions listed above controls. Clinical encounters decreased by 41.9%, lab
can be an excellent way of doing an assessment. encounters dropped by 43.5%, and procedures were
2. Shared goal setting. In health professions training, we decreased by 21.4%.16 In another study investigating the
learn about how to interview people. One of the is- incidence and cost of treatment for upper respiratory
sues that arises during such training is agenda setting. illness, those who were taught mindfulness had a 70%
Remember, you do not give up your own priorities for the lower cost ($65 per meditator vs $214 per control) than
visit. Rather, you weave them into the overall process. did untreated controls.17
For our example patient previously, the clinician may The Diabetes Prevention Trial confirmed the value
have the goal of bringing down the patient’s heart dis- of healthy lifestyle choices, noting they were not only
ease risk. The items noted in the health plan, such as more effective clinically in reducing the incidence of
a potential reduction in financial stress by attaining a progression to diabetes when compared to metformin18
better-paying job, are useful for this process. but were also more cost effective.19 Avoiding smoking,
3. Health planning. Health planning is the step in moving the body, improving nutrition, maintaining a
which the clinician and patient work together to healthy body weight, and limiting excessive alcohol use
talk about what they will do. Patients often have dramatically improved the cost effectiveness. Practic-
great ideas already—just ask. Clinicians should ing these lifestyle behaviors was shown to decrease the
bring up their own ideas as well. Remember, for a incidence of coronary events by 83% in 84,129 women
plan to be successful, you have to have their buy-in. followed in the Nurse’s Health Study20,21 and by 79% in
Now is the time for you to decide whether you do 20,721 Swedish men followed for 11 years.22 These key
have their buy-in and how to increase it. determinants of health were also associated with living
4. Skill-building and support. Health planning does not 14 years longer in 20,244 people followed in the EPIC–
end when the patient leaves the room. It is incumbent Norfolk Study.23 The Whole Health approach allows us
upon the health care team to provide guidance to the to link meaning to action so that those we serve are more
person seeking care. What skills do they need to have? likely to incorporate these powerful behaviors into their
Does someone teach them a mind–body approach? own lives.
Do they need help signing up to do volunteer work? What one does is much more effective than what one
Is there a meditation practice you would like them to takes. Value is added when we are able to encourage and
try? Providing the information and connections they support personalized, proactive, patient-driven care. The
need is important. As is the case with any clinical visit, Whole Health approach is a powerful and innovative way
you also need be very clear in stating what steps will to achieve value by valuing what matters to the people
follow. When will they see you again? When will they who seek our care.
4 The Whole Health Process 33
The Veterans Administration Videos from the VA’s patient-centered care that explores the
www.va.gov/patientcenteredcare/multimedia-and-resources.asp Whole Health process
Whole Health Video A VA-sponsored video that conveys the vision of the Whole
http://bcove.me/7si4hxcv Health Process of Care
Personal Health Planning Video A VA-sponsored video that summarizes the process of Per-
http://bcove.me/35dbfmed sonal Health Planning
REFERENCES
References are available online at ExpertConsult.com.
REFERENCES 13. Wain RM, Wilbourne PL, Harris KW, et al.: Motivational inter-
view improves treatment entry in homeless veterans, Drug Alcohol
1. Burwell SM: Setting value-based payment goals - HHS efforts to Depend 115(1-2):113–119, 2011.
improve U.S. health care, N Engl J Med 372(10):897–899, 2015. 14. Lussier MT, Richard C: The motivational interview: in practice,
2. Phillips Jr RL, Pugno PA, Saultz JW, et al.: Health is primary: Can Fam Physician 53(12):2117–2118, 2007.
family medicine for america’s health, Ann Fam Med 12(Suppl 15. Simmons LA, Drake C, Snyderman R: Whole health in primary
1):S1–S12, 2014. care: personalized health planning and patient-centered care in a clinical
3. Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Weaver F, et al.: Contextual errors and setting, 2014, Duke University.
failures in individualizing patient care: a multicenter study, Ann 16. Stahl JE, Dossett ML, LaJoie AS, et al.: Relaxation response and
Intern Med 153(2):69–75, 2010. resiliency training and its effect on healthcare resource utilization,
4. Weiner SJ, Schwartz A: Contextual errors in medical decision PLoS One 10(10):e0140212, 2015.
making: overlooked and understudied, Acad Med 91(5):657–662, 2016. 17. Rakel D, Mundt M, Ewers T, et al.: Value associated with mindful-
5. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ, et al.: Con- ness meditation and moderate exercise intervention in acute respira-
text matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically tory infection: the MEPARI Study, Fam Pract 30(4):390–397, 2013.
reporting contextual factors important for practice change, Ann 18. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, et al.: Prevention of type
Fam Med 11(Suppl 1):S115–123, 2013. 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with
6. Driscoll DL, Hiratsuka V, Johnston JM, et al.: Process and impaired glucose tolerance, N Engl J Med 344(18):1343–1350,
outcomes of patient-centered medical care with Alaska native peo- 2001.
ple at southcentral foundation, Ann Fam Med 11(Suppl 1):S41–49, 19. Diabetes Prevention Program Research G: The 10-year cost-
2013. effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes
7. Gottlieb K, Sylvester I, Eby D: Transforming your practice: what prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS, Diabe-
matters most, Family pract manage 15(1):32–38, 2008. tes care 35(4):723–730, 2012.
8. Eby DK: Primary care at the Alaska native medical center: a fully 20. Willett WC: The Mediterranean diet: science and practice, Public
deployed “new model” of primary care, Int J Circumpolar Health Health Nutr 9(1A):105–110, 2006.
66(Suppl 1):4–13, 2007. 21. Yancy Jr WS, Westman EC, French PA, Califf RM: Diets and
9. Smith JJ, Johnston JM, Hiratsuka VY, Dillard DA, Tierney S, clinical coronary events: the truth is out there, Circulation 107(1):
Driscoll DL: Medical home implementation and trends in diabetes 10–16, 2003.
quality measures for AN/AI primary care patients, Prim Care Dia- 22. Akesson A, Larsson SC, Discacciati A, Wolk A: Low-Risk diet and
betes 9(2):120–126, 2015. lifestyle habits in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction
10. Smith JJ, Berman MD, Hiratsuka VY, Frazier RR: The effect of in men: a population-based prospective cohort study, J Am Coll
regular primary care utilization on long-term glycemic and blood Cardiol 64(13):1299–1306, 2014.
pressure control in adults with diabetes, J Am Board Fam Med 23. Khaw KT, Wareham N, Bingham S, Welch A, Luben R, Day N:
28(1):28–37, 2015. Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and
11. Institute of Medicine CoQoHCiA: Crossing the quality chasm: a women: the EPIC-norfolk prospective population study, PLoS Med
new health system for the 21st century, Washington, DC, 2001, 5(1):e12, 2008.
National Academy Press. 24. Rakel DP, Jonas WB: The patient-centered medical home. In
12. Krejci LP, Carter K, Gaudet T: Whole health: the vision and Rakel RE, Rakel DP, editors: Textbook of Family Medicine, vol 9,
implementation of personalized, proactive, patient-driven health Philadelphia, PA, 2016, Elsevier, pp 17–24.
care for veterans, Med Care 52(12 Suppl 5):S5–8, 2014.
33.e1