TP TWITTER Revised
TP TWITTER Revised
TP TWITTER Revised
(MATRIC NO.)
(LECTURER’S NAME)
(SECTION)
(DATE OF SUBMISSION)
Learning has been placed in its utmost importance in Islam that it is mentioned in Al-
Quran, Surah Al-Zumr, ayah 9, "Are those equal, those who know and those who do not
know?" Islam looks highly of those who have knowledge than those who are ignorant. It is
further explained in another surah that "Allah grants wisdom to whom He pleases and to
ayah 269). It is emphasized that those who receive knowledge will get the benefits.
Knowledge sharing is also encouraged in Islam that Prophet Muhammad also said that
knowledge should be acquired and imparted to the people (Hadith Al-Tirmidhi, 107).
Therefore, the emergence of Web 2.0 should not only be regarded as the source of knowledge
but also as the tool to impart and share knowledge. It should be tapped into traditional
teaching and learning so that students can reap the benefits for the sake of Islam.
O’Reilly (2005) coined the word Web 2.0 to describe the next advancement of
harness collective intelligence. One of the most known Web 2.0 tools is Twitter, a micro-
blogging site vastly used as an exchange network that works in real-time. It allows web users
to communicate and stay connected to share the latest updates. Long after its introduction,
Twitter is still a powerful tool growing significantly as its 50 million users send out 230
million tweets per day while functioning as an inter-platform of social network where
information is shared easily in the cyberspace (Lomicka & Lord, 2012). In addition, rapid
sharing has also enabled the learners to find information easily and share it conveniently
online which creates another way for learning to take place outside the classroom
environment.
Harrison and Thomas (2009, p.113) argued that “Social network sites are thus primarily
concerned with people who already know each other, and use the Internet as one way of
keeping their existing social connections alive, rather than for making new ones.” Thus,
incorporating the use of Twitter as one of the learning and teaching tools would be one of the
best options for students to improve their learning as they are already exposed to the main use
In addition, it is also evident that students are more engaged with online learning
where there is less supervision and when there is a structured lesson (Junco et al., 2010; Kim,
2010; Kist et al., 2010; Acar & Kimura, 2012; Junco, 2012; Lomicka & Lord, 2012). With
the easy access of Twitter on smartphones and personal computers among learners, the inter-
platform usage between Twitter and other social networking sites such as Facebook and
Wordpress helps information sharing and enables easy access to notes and reading materials.
Despite the popularity of Twitter and other social networking sites among young learners and
adults, a review of the relevant literature on using Web 2.0 technologies in second language
(L2) learning shows that blogs and wikis are the most studied Web 2.0 tools (Wang &
Vasquez, 2012). This is mostly because the usage of the tools in language learning is still in
its beginning stage and there is not much research conducted on social networking sites to
assist L2 language learners’ writing skills especially in English as a second language (ESL).
To illustrate the clear use of Web 2.0 further, Allen (2009 & 2013) defined Web 2.0
as a principal way to describe emerging trends and new developments for the web when it
was coined in 2005 as it is interconnects several main features in the Internet that basically
enable users to create and read their own content. Web 2.0 basically enables users to have the
liberty to engage, create, deliver and even circulate their content freely on the Internet. This is
perhaps the focal point of using Web 2.0 tools as a medium for communicating, teaching and
learning in ESL classrooms. Mohamad Amin Embi (2011) viewed Twitter as microblogging
– a form of blogging that enables users to publish online brief text updates, usually less than
140-200 characters which can be edited and accessed online. In addition, the posts can be
embedded as a widget on blogs or sites by the author which also enables a real-time
This paper will discuss the usage of Twitter to improve students’ academic
critical thinking and discussion, and finally, encouraging students to utilize computer-
It has been observed that students frequently use the Twitter application available in
their smartphones. This may be beneficial for them if they channel their interest into learning
especially in building their vocabulary and improving their writing skills through Twitter.
users recognised the Internet as their central source of information compared to other major
media including television, radio, newspapers and books. In finding out about the effect of
Twitter on enhancing reading skills and vocabulary, Hao (2012) revealed that there was no
significant difference in the results of the reading pre-test and post-test for the control group
and experimental group. Nevertheless, this may be affected by the short duration of
participation in using Twitter. The experiment was also limited to the class sessions and no
further Twitter activities were done beyond classroom lessons. In another study conducted by
Junco, Heiberger and Loken (2010), it was discovered that the students in the experimental
group had a significantly greater increase in classroom engagement than the control group as
well as higher grade point average in their tests. It is also further emphasized that Twitter
played an important role by engaging students to participate actively and mobilising the
In addition, Acar and Kimura (2012) viewed Twitter as a tool for language learning
to help learners communicate through simple greetings in their daily tweets. Twitter also
acted as “a short version of a diary,” (p.8) and allowed learners to learn new vocabulary when
they used the dictionary to search for suitable words before posting them online. It can be
concluded that learners who constantly communicate via Twitter will eventually improve
Recently, more research has been conducted to find out the effects of Web 2.0 tools
usage, Twitter in specific, on the students’ performance with various views and interesting
findings being made. This has triggered experimental research on Twitter to get the students
to seize the opportunity to interact more often by engaging them with critical thinking and
discussions while encouraging learning to take place beyond the classroom environment
(Junco et al., 2010; Junco, 2010 & 2012; MacArthur & Karchmer-Klein, 2010; Kassens-
Meanwhile, there may be concerns about exposing younger students and new
language learners to internet-based learning through Web 2.0 tools, and those would be
mainly on the effects of language structures used on Twitter and how these will weaken the
writing development of the learners. The 140 characters limitation posed by Twitter might
not be helpful for learners’ writing skills as it might be forcing the users to be as concise as
possible in conveying their ideas or opinions (MacArthur & Karchmer-Klein, 2010). On the
other hand, Warschauer (2001) believed that Internet-based activities should be well planned
and integrated in order for the activities to be successful. Also, it could be put into good use
as the best way for the teachers to stay in touch with their students and share information
conveniently. Since the study of Web 2.0 in language learning is relatively new, there is no
strong and well-established framework that is clearly grounded to support this study.
Twitter is also a platform to encourage learners’ autonomy which may help improve
their language skills. In other words, it allows the learners to do reflective thinking and
exchange information at any time and place convenient for them using their smartphones.
The data recorded online make it easier for the learners to review their academic discussions
outside the class in comparison to conventional classroom discussions that end right after a
Other than getting students to engage in discussions through Twitter, it is found that
the content of the tweet may allow a variety of topics to be tweeted by the learners as they
help other learners on Twitter to keep up with the updates every day. Acar and Kimura
(2011) asserted that reading Twitter updates and responding to the learners’ tweets was an
effective way to learn a language. They were also able to post questions, suggest new ideas
and obtain more new vocabulary in their online discussion on Twitter other than being
involved in critical thinking and discussion solely. Also, Twitter enabled older students to
review what they had learnt conveniently and it did not restrict their academic discussions
only within the classroom during class hours (Fei Gao, Tian Luo & Ke Zhang 2012).
In using computers for teaching and learning writing, Macaro (2003) discussed that
the use of computers may cause a certain degree of difficulty as the technology has rapidly
evolved and become out of date quickly. To catch up with the advancement of technology,
there seems to be more ways of looking at the impact of computers on writing, especially in a
second language environment. It is stated that there is a need to break away from the view
that learners do not necessarily gain benefits from computer aided learning just because they
appear to be interested in it. With the reasons mentioned, there is a need for studies to learn
more on utilising computer-mediated writing, in this case through the use of Twitter to
One of the benefits of computer-aided learning is that students who lack confidence
are given equal opportunities to participate in online discussions without worrying about their
peers’ and teachers’ response and feedback. This is because online learning and discussions
are carried out democratically, with the least interruption from the teacher as compared to the
Macaro, 2003).
Nonetheless, it is also found that there is still lack of information on how the students
improve in their second language proficiency. Looking at more recent research, the Internet
use in language learning has been viewed as the medium to accelerate the writing processes
that are highly related to the social and cognitive process of the learners (MacArthur &
Karchmer-Klein, 2010). Bennett et al. (2012) discovered that students who were involved in a
writing activity had different views on the usage of blogs to support them in their learning.
Some found it “time consuming and of little value” (p.531). The study also found the
following:
One reason for this diversity may be the fact that some students’ postings received
extensive comments, while other students’ postings were apparently ignored by their
peers. However, the diversity may also reflect differences in students’ interest in and
Next, it has to be taken into consideration that the Internet is a robust space that
allows students to search for information actively while creating and sharing their content as
writers. Besides being involved in the process of researching and reading, the students are
encouraged to read critically, expressing their opinions and ideas while linking with multiple
media and reading resources online (MacArthur & Karchmer-Klein, 2010; Bennet et al.,
2012). With these opportunities, it has become the most vital source of information network
for reading and writing in ESL environment, at the same time allowing students to practice
believed that the dynamic nature of the Internet also requires a high degree of flexibility and
interaction. Therefore, tapping into a Web 2.0 tool such as Twitter will allow a complex
autonomously.
To sum up, despite the huge utilisation of Twitter that sometimes invites more harm
than good, it is much applauded to have it used for the benefits of learning and sharing
knowledge and information. Learners are able to find information conveniently and have
more autonomy while learning in a structured lesson (Junco et al., 2010; Kim, 2010; Kist et
al., 2010; Acar & Kimura, 2012; Junco, 2012; Lomicka & Lord, 2012). This will be an
advantage for teachers with a huge classroom to manage and it will encourage quieter
students to participate in learning without being left behind. Next, it is learned that learners
today view the Internet as their main source of information in comparison to other media
such as television, radio, newspaper and books, and it is also discovered that the exposure to
the use of Twitter get the students to learn and participate in a discussion actively. In
actively and make their views be heard beyond the classroom. It is also one of the ways for
teachers to keep in touch with the students without being invasive while guiding the students
to convey their ideas and opinions effectively (MacArthur & Karchmer-Klein, 2010). Besides
utilizing Twitter to enhance learners’ vocabulary and assist them in engaging in critical
discussions, Twitter might also help learners to improve their writing skills during their
online interaction. On the other hand, the setback of having Twitter 140 characters limit is
mainly due to the limited language structures used on Twitter and how this may affect the
younger learners’ writing development. Also, learners might have different views on this
matter. However, it should be considered as learners could do a lot more while creating and
sharing content on Twitter despite their feedback that the writing activity done on Twitter
could be overwhelming in terms of the time spent on it, and the fact that some of the learners
felt left out when their posting was ignored by their peers (Bennett et al. 2012). Indeed, the
Internet is the most dynamic source of information to date and it is hoped that Twitter can be
References
‘Abdullah Yusof ‘Ali, the Holy Quran, Text and Translation, Surah Al-Zumr: 9, Islamic
‘Abdullah Yusof ‘Ali, the Holy Quran, Text and Translation, Surah Al-Baqarah: 269, Islamic
Acar, A. & Kimura, Nanako. (2012). Twitter as a tool for language learning: The case of
Allen, M. (2009). Tim O'Reilly and Web 2.0: The economics of memetic liberty and control.
Allen, M. (2013). What was Web 2.0? Versions as the dominant mode of internet history.
Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing
Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers &
Fei Gao, Tian Luo & Ke Zhang. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research
Hao, Yuan Cheng (2012). Applying Twitter to EFL Reading and Writing in A Taiwanese
Harrison, R. & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in Online Communities: Social Networking Sites
Junco, R., Heibergert,G. & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college students’
engagement and grades. Journal for Computer Assisted Learning, 27 (2), 119-132.
Junco, R., & Cotton, S.R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and
learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets. Active Learning in Higher
Kim, Heyoung. (2010). Three teachers’ initial efforts to use Twitter for teaching English in
Kist, W. (2010). Web 2.0 in the elementary classroom: Portraits of possibilities. Language
Lomicka, L. & Lord, G. (2012). A tale of tweets: Analyzing microblogging among language
MacArthur, C.A. & Karchmer-Klein, R.A. (2010). Web 2.0: New opportunities for writing.
In Troia, G.A., Shankland, R.K. & Heintz, A. (Eds.). Putting Writing Research into
Practice: Applications for Teachers Professional Development (pp. 45-69). New York:
Guildford Press.
Mohamad Amin Embi. (2011). Web 2.0 Social Networking Tools: A Quick Guide. Centre for
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0 – Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next
20. html
Park Seung Won. (2013). The Potential Of Web 2.0 Tools To Promote Reading Engagement
Wang, Shenggao & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does