https://www.nationalgeographic.

com/magazine/2019/03/extraterrestrial-life-probably-exists-how-do-we-search-for-
aliens.html

© 1996-2015 National Geographic Society, © 2015- 2020 National Geographic Partners, LLC. All rights reserved

M AGA Z I N E

Life probably exists beyond Earth. So

how do we find it?
With next-generation telescopes, tiny space probes, and more, scientists aim to
search for life beyond our solar system—and make contact.
BY JAMIE SHREEVE
PHOTOGRAPHS BY SPENCER LOWELL
ART BY DANA BERRY

This story appears in the March 2019 issue of National Geographic magazine.

In her office on the 17th floor of MIT’s Building 54, Sara Seager is about as close to
space as you can get in Cambridge, Massachusetts. From her window, she can see
across the Charles River to downtown Boston in one direction and past Fenway Park in
the other. Inside, her view extends to the Milky Way and beyond.

Seager, 47, is an astrophysicist. Her specialty is exoplanets, namely all the planets in the
universe except the ones you already know about revolving around our sun. On a
blackboard, she has sketched an equation she thought up to estimate the chances of
detecting life on such a planet. Beneath another blackboard filled with more equations
is a clutter of memorabilia, including a vial containing some glossy black shards.

“It’s a rock that we melted.”

Seager speaks in brisk, uninflected phrases, and she has penetrating hazel eyes that
hold on to whomever she is talking to. She explains that there are planets known as hot
super-Earths whizzing about so close to their stars that a year lasts less than a day.
“These planets are so hot, they probably have giant lava lakes,” she says. Hence, the
melted rock.

“We wanted to test the brightness of lava.”

When Seager entered graduate school in the mid-1990s, we didn’t know about planets
that circle their stars in hours or others that take almost a million years. We didn’t
know about planets that revolve around two stars, or rogue planets that don’t orbit any
star but just wander about in space. In fact, we didn’t know for sure that any planets at
all existed beyond our solar system, and a lot of the assumptions we made about
planet-ness have turned out to be wrong. The very first exoplanet found—51 Pegasi b,
discovered in 1995—was itself a surprise: A giant planet crammed up against its star,
winging around it in just four days.

“51 Peg should have let everyone know it was going to be a crazy ride,” Seager says.
“That planet shouldn’t be there.”

Today we have confirmed about 4,000 exoplanets. The majority were discovered by the
Kepler space telescope, launched in 2009. Kepler’s mission was to see how many
planets it could find orbiting some 150,000 stars in one tiny patch of sky—about as
much as you can cover with your hand with your arm outstretched. But its ultimate
purpose was to resolve a much more freighted question: Are places where life might
evolve common in the universe or vanishingly rare, leaving us effectively without hope
of ever knowing whether another living world exists?

Kepler’s answer was unequivocal. There are more planets than there are stars, and at
least a quarter are Earth-size planets in their star’s so-called habitable zone, where
conditions are neither too hot nor too cold for life. With a minimum of 100 billion stars
in the Milky Way, that means there are at least 25 billion places where life could
conceivably take hold in our galaxy alone—and our galaxy is one among trillions.

It’s no wonder that Kepler, which ran out of fuel last October, is regarded almost with
reverence by astronomers. (“Kepler was the greatest step forward in the Copernican
revolution since Copernicus,” University of California, Berkeley astrophysicist Andrew
Siemion told me.) It’s changed the way we approach one of the great mysteries of
existence. The question is no longer, is there life beyond Earth? It’s a pretty sure bet
there is. The question now is, how do we find it?

The revelation that the galaxy is teeming with planets has reenergized the search for
life. A surge in private funding has created a much more nimble, risk-friendly research
agenda. NASA too is intensifying its efforts in astrobiology. Most of the research is
focused on finding signs of any sort of life on other worlds. But the prospect of new
targets, new money, and ever increasing computational power has also galvanized the
decades-long search for intelligent aliens.

To Seager, a MacArthur “genius award” winner, participating on the Kepler team was
one more step toward a lifelong goal: to find an Earth-like planet orbiting a sunlike
star. Her current focus is the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), an MIT-led
NASA space telescope launched last year. Like Kepler, TESS looks for a slight dimming
in the luminosity of a star when a planet passes—transits—in front of it. TESS is
scanning nearly the whole sky, with the goal of identifying about 50 exoplanets with
rocky surfaces like Earth’s that could be investigated by more powerful telescopes
coming on line, beginning with the James Webb Space Telescope, which NASA hopes to
launch in 2021.

On her “vision table,” which runs along one wall of her office, Seager has collected
some objects that express “where I am now and where I’m going, so I can remind
myself why I’m working so hard.” Among them are some polished stone orbs
representing a red dwarf star and its covey of planets, and a model of ASTERIA, a low-
cost planet-finding satellite she developed.

“I haven’t gotten around to putting this up,” Seager says, unrolling a poster that’s a
fitting expression of where her career began. It’s a chart showing the spectral
signatures of the elements, like colored bar codes. Every chemical compound absorbs a
unique set of wavelengths of light. (We see leaves as green, for instance, because
chlorophyll is a light-hungry molecule that absorbs red and blue, so the only light
reflected is green.) While still in her 20s, Seager came up with the idea that compounds
in a transiting planet’s upper atmosphere might leave their spectral fingerprints in
starlight passing through. Theoretically, if there are gases in a planet’s atmosphere
from living creatures, we could see the evidence in the light that reaches us.

“It’s going to be really hard,” she tells me. “Think of a rocky planet’s atmosphere as the
skin of an onion, and the whole thing is in front of, like, an IMAX screen.”

There’s an outside chance a rocky planet orbits a star close enough for the Webb
telescope to capture sufficient light to investigate it for signs of life. But most scientists,
including Seager, think we’ll need to wait for the next generation of space telescopes.
Covering most of the wall over her vision table is a panel of micro-thin black plastic
shaped like the petal of a giant flower. It’s a reminder of where she’s going: a space
mission, still in development, that she believes can lead her to another living Earth.

From an early age, Olivier Guyon has had a problem with sleep: namely, that it’s
supposed to happen at night, when it’s so much better to be awake. Guyon grew up in
France, in the countryside of Champagne. When he was 11, his parents bought him a
small telescope, which he says they later regretted. He spent many nights peering into
it, only to fall asleep the next day in class. When he outgrew that telescope, he built a
bigger one. But while he could magnify his view of heavenly objects, Guyon could do
nothing to enlarge the number of hours in the night. Something had to give, so one day
when he was a teenager, he decided to do away with sleep almost entirely. At first he
felt great, but after a week or so, he became seriously ill. Recalling it now, he still
shudders.

At 43 years old, Guyon today has a very big telescope to work with. The Subaru
observatory, along with 12 others, sits atop the summit of Mauna Kea, on Hawaii’s Big
Island. The Subaru’s 8.2-meter (27 feet) reflector is among the largest single-piece
mirrors in the world. (Operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, the
telescope has no affiliation with the car company—Subaru is the Japanese name for the
Pleiades star cluster.) At 13,796 feet above sea level, Mauna Kea affords one of the
highest, clearest views of the universe, yet it’s only an hour and a half drive from
Guyon’s home in Hilo. The proximity allows him to make frequent trips to test and
improve the instrument he built and attached to the telescope, often working through
the night. He carries around a thermos of espresso, and for a while he took to spiking it
with shots of liquid caffeine, until a friend pointed out that his daily intake was more
than half the lethal dose.
“We can spend a couple weeks up here, and we start to forget about life on Earth,” he
tells me. “First you forget the day of the week. Then you start forgetting to call your
family.”

Like Seager, Guyon is a MacArthur winner. His particular genius is in the mastery of
light: how to massage and manipulate it to catch a glimpse of things that even the
Subaru’s huge mirror would be blind to without Guyon’s legerdemain.

“The big question is whether there is biological activity up there,” he says, pointing at
the sky. “If yes, what is it like? Are there continents? Oceans and clouds? All these
questions can be answered, if you can extract the light of a planet from the light of its
star.”

In other words, if you can see the planet. Trying to separate the light of a rocky, Earth-
size planet from that of its star is like squinting hard enough to make out a fruit fly
hovering inches in front of a floodlight. It doesn’t seem possible, and with today’s
telescopes, it isn’t. But Guyon has his sights set on what the next generation of ground-
based telescopes might be able to do, if they can be fashioned to squint very, very hard.

That is precisely what his instrument is designed to do. The apparatus is called—brace
yourself—the Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics (SCExAO, pronounced
“skex-a-o”). Guyon wanted me to see it in action, but a power outage had shut down the
Subaru. Instead he offers to give me a tour of the 141-foot dome enclosing the telescope.
There is 40 percent less oxygen here than at sea level. Visitors have the option of
strapping on some bottled oxygen, but he decides that I don’t need any, and off we go.

“I was giving a tour the other day to some scientists, and all of a sudden, one of them
fainted!” he says, with a mixture of surprise and regret. “I should have known she was
not doing well. She had gotten very quiet.” I clutch the railings and make sure to keep
asking questions.

Ground telescopes like the Subaru are much more powerful light-gatherers than space
telescopes like the Hubble, chiefly because nobody has yet figured out how to squeeze a
27-foot mirror into a rocket and blast it into space. But ground telescopes have a
serious drawback: They sit under miles of our atmosphere. Fluctuations in the air’s
temperature cause light to bend erratically—think of a twinkling star, or the wavy air
above an asphalt road in the summertime.

The first task of the SCExAO is to iron out those wrinkles. This is accomplished by
directing the light from a star onto a shape-shifting mirror, smaller than a quarter,
activated by 2,000 tiny motors. Using information from a camera, the motors deform
the mirror 3,000 times a second to precisely counter the atmospheric aberrations, and
voilà, a beam of starlight can be viewed that is as close as possible to what it was before
our atmosphere messed it up. Next comes the squinting part. To Guyon, a star’s
luminosity is “a boiling blob of light that we’re trying to get rid of.” His instrument
includes an intricate system of apertures, mirrors, and masks called a coronagraph,
which allows only the light reflected off the planet to slip through.
There’s a great deal more to the apparatus; staring at a schematic of the device is
enough to cause vertigo, even at sea level. But the eventual result, once the next-gen
telescopes are built, will be a visible dot of light that is actually a rocky planet. Shunt
this image to a spectrometer, a device that can parse light into its wavelengths, and you
can start dusting it for those fingerprints of life, called biosignatures.

There’s one biosignature that Seager, Guyon, and just about everyone else agree would
be as near a slam dunk for life as scientific caution allows. We already have a planet to
prove it. On Earth, plants and certain bacteria produce oxygen as a by-product of
photosynthesis. Oxygen is a flagrantly promiscuous molecule—it’ll react and bond with
just about everything on a planet’s surface. So if we can find evidence of it
accumulating in an atmosphere, it will raise some eyebrows. Even more telling would
be a biosignature composed of oxygen and other compounds related to life on Earth.
Most convincing of all would be to find oxygen along with methane, because those two
gases from living organisms destroy each other. Finding them both would mean there
must be constant replenishment.

It would be grossly geocentric, however, to limit the search for extraterrestrial life to
oxygen and methane. Life could take forms other than photosynthesizing plants, and
indeed even here on Earth, anaerobic life existed for billions of years before oxygen
began to accumulate in the atmosphere. As long as some basic requirements are met—
energy, nutrients, and a liquid medium—life could evolve in ways that would produce
any number of different gases. The key is finding gases in excess of what should be
there.

There are other sorts of biosignatures we can look for too. The chlorophyll in
vegetation reflects near-infrared light—the so-called red edge, invisible to human eyes
but easily observable with infrared telescopes. Find it in a planet’s biosignature, and
you may well have found an extraterrestrial forest. But the vegetation on other planets
might absorb different wavelengths of light—there could be planets with Black Forests
that are truly black, or planets where roses are red, and so is everything else.

And why stick to plants? Lisa Kaltenegger, who directs the Carl Sagan Institute at
Cornell University, and her colleagues have published the spectral characteristics of
137 microorganisms, including ones in extreme Earth environments that, on another
planet, might be the norm. It’s no wonder the next generation of telescopes is so eagerly
anticipated.

“For the first time, we’ll be able to collect enough light,” says Kaltenegger. “We’ll be able
to figure things out.”

The first and most powerful of the next-gen ground telescopes, the European Southern
Observatory’s eponymous Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) in the Atacama Desert of
Chile, is scheduled to start operation in 2024. The light-gathering capacity of its 39-
meter (128 feet) mirror will exceed all existing Subaru-size telescopes combined.
Outfitted with a souped-up version of Guyon’s instrument, the ELT will be fully capable
of imaging rocky planets in the habitable zone of red dwarf stars, the most common
stars in the galaxy. They are smaller and dimmer than our sun, a yellow dwarf, so their
habitable zones are closer to the star. The nearer a planet is to its star, the more light it
reflects.

Alas, the habitable zone of a red dwarf star is not the coziest place in the galaxy. Red
dwarfs are highly energetic, frequently hurtling flares out into space as they progress
through what Seager calls a period of “very long, bad, teenage behavior.” There might
be ways an atmosphere could evolve that would protect nascent life from being fried
by these solar tantrums. But planets around red dwarfs are also likely to be “tidally
locked”—always presenting one side to the star, in the same way our moon shows only
one face to the Earth. This would render half the planet too hot for life, the other half
too cold. The midline, though, might be temperate enough for life.

As it happens, there’s a rocky planet, called Proxima Centauri b, orbiting in the

habitable zone of Proxima Centauri, a red dwarf that’s the nearest star to our own,
about 4.2 light-years, or 25 trillion miles, away. “It’s a terribly exciting target,” Guyon
says. But he agrees with Seager that the best chance of finding life will be on an Earth-
like planet orbiting a sunlike star. The ELT and its ilk will be fantastic at gathering light,
but even those behemoth ground telescopes won’t be able to separate the light of a
planet from that of a star 10 billion times brighter.

That’s going to take a little more time and even more exotic—one might even say
dreamlike—technology. Remember that flower petal–shaped panel on Seager’s wall?
It’s a piece of a space instrument called Starshade. Its design consists of 28 panels
arranged around a center hub like a giant sunflower, more than 100 feet across. The
petals are precisely shaped and rippled to deflect the light from a star, leaving a super-
dark shadow trailing behind. If a telescope is positioned far back in that tunnel of
darkness, it will be able to capture the glimmer from an Earth-like planet visible just
beyond the Starshade’s edge.

Starshade’s earliest likely partner is called the Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope
(WFIRST), scheduled to be finished by the mid-2020s. The two spacecraft will work
together in a sort of celestial pas de deux: Starshade will amble into position to block
the light from a star so WFIRST can detect any planets around it and potentially sample
their spectra for signs of life. Then, while WFIRST busies itself with other tasks,
Starshade will fly off into position to block the light of the next star on its list of targets.
Though the dancers will be tens of thousands of miles apart, they must be aligned to
within a single meter for the choreography to work.

Starshade, under development at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena,

California, is still a decade or so away, and indeed there’s no guarantee that it will be
funded. Seager, who hopes to lead the project, is confident. One can only hope. There’s
something uniquely uplifting about the prospect of a giant flower in space unfurling its
petals to parry the light from a distant sun to see if its orbiting worlds are alive.

When Jon Richards answered an ad in 2008 on Craigslist for a software programmer,

he couldn’t have imagined he would spend much of the next 10 years in a remote
valley in Northern California, looking for aliens. The search for extraterrestrial
intelligence, or SETI, refers to both a research endeavor and a nonprofit organization,
the SETI Institute, which employs Richards to run the Allen Telescope Array (ATA), a
340-mile drive from the institute’s headquarters in Silicon Valley. The ATA is the only
facility on the planet built expressly for detecting signals from alien civilizations.
Funded largely by the late Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, it was envisioned as an
assembly of 350 radio telescopes, with dishes six meters (20 feet) in diameter. But
owing to funding difficulties—a regrettable leitmotif in SETI history—only 42 have
been built. At one time seven scientists helped run the ATA, but due to attrition,
Richards is “the last man standing,” as he gamely puts it.

I’ve come to see Richards on a hot day in August, soon after a rash of wildfires in the
area. Smoke veils the view of the surrounding mountains, and in the haze the dishes
seem primordially still, like Easter Island statues, each one staring implacably at the
same spot in a featureless sky. Richards takes me to one of the dishes, opening the bay
doors beneath it to reveal its newly installed antenna feed: a crenellated taper of shiny
copper housed in a thick glass cone. “Looks kinda like a death ray,” he says.

Richards’s job is to manage the hardware and software, including algorithms developed
to sift through the several hundred thousand radio signals streaming into the
telescopes every night, in search of a “signal of interest.” Radio frequencies have been
the favored hunting ground of SETI since the search for alien transmissions began 60
years ago, largely because they travel most efficiently through space. SETI scientists
have focused in particular on a quiet zone in the radio spectrum, free of background
noise from the galaxy. It made sense to search in this relatively undisturbed range of
frequencies, since that would be where sensible aliens would be most likely to
transmit.

Richards tells me that the ATA is working through a target list of 20,000 red dwarfs. In
the evening, he makes sure everything is working properly, and while he sleeps, the
dishes point, the antennas rouse, photons scuttle through fiber optic cables, and the
radio music of the cosmos streams to enormous processors. If a signal passes tests that
suggest it stems from neither a natural source nor some quotidian terrestrial one—a
satellite, a plane, somebody’s key fob—the computer kicks out an email alert. This being
an email he wouldn’t want to miss, Richards has set up his cell service to forward the
message to his phone. Conceivably, then, our first contact from an alien civilization
could come as a text rattling Richards’s phone on his night table.

So far, however, all the signals of interest have been false alarms. Unlike other
experiments, where progress can be made incrementally, SETI is binary: Either
extraterrestrials make contact on your watch, or they don’t. Even if they’re out there,
the chances that you’re looking in just the right place at just the right time and at just
the right radio frequency are remote. Jill Tarter, the retired head of research at SETI,
likens the search to dipping a cup in the ocean: The chance you’ll find a fish is
exceedingly small, but that doesn’t mean the ocean isn’t full of fish. Unfortunately,
Congress long ago lost interest in dipping the cup, abruptly terminating support in
1993.

The good news is that SETI the research endeavor, if not SETI the institute, has
recently received a remarkable boost in funding, sending ripples of excitement through
the field. In 2015 Yuri Milner, a Russian-born venture capitalist, established the
Breakthrough Initiatives, committing at least $200 million to look for life in the
universe, including $100 million specifically to search for alien civilizations. Milner
was an early investor in Facebook, Twitter, and many other internet companies you
wish you’d been an early investor in. Before that, he founded a highly successful
internet company in Russia. His philanthropic vision might be summed up as, if we
agree that finding evidence for alien intelligence is worth $100 million, why shouldn’t it
be his $100 million? “If you look at it that way, it makes sense,” he says, when I meet
him in a glitzy watering hole in Silicon Valley. “If it was a billion a year—we should
talk.”

Milner is soft-spoken and unobtrusive; I hadn’t noticed him arrive until he was
standing right next to my chair. He tells me about his background—a degree in physics,
a lifelong passion for astronomy, and parents who named him after the cosmonaut Yuri
Gagarin, who became the first human in outer space seven months before Milner was
born. That was in 1961, which he points out is the same year SETI began. “Everything is
interrelated,” he says.

Through one of his initiatives, Breakthrough Listen, he intends to spend $100 million
over 10 years, most of it through the SETI Research Center at UC Berkeley. Another
project, Breakthrough Watch, is underwriting new technology to search for
biosignatures with the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile.

Most far out of all—in both senses—is Milner’s Breakthrough Starshot, which is
investing $100 million to explore the feasibility of actually going to the nearest star
system, Alpha Centauri, which includes the rocky planet Proxima b. Appreciating the
magnitude of this challenge requires some perspective. The first Voyager spacecraft,
launched in 1977, took 35 years to enter interstellar space. Traveling at that speed,
Voyager would need some 75,000 years to reach Alpha Centauri. In the current vision
for Starshot, a fleet of pebble-size spaceships hurtling through space at one-fifth the
speed of light could reach Alpha Centauri in a mere 20 years. Working from a road map
originally proposed by physicist Philip Lubin at UC Santa Barbara, these tiny Niñas,
Pintas, and Santa Marías would be propelled by a ground-based laser array, more
powerful than a million suns. It may not be possible. But that’s the advantage of private
money: Unlike a government program, you’re allowed—expected—to take a big
gamble.

“Let’s see in five or 10 years whether it will work,” Milner says, with a shrug. “I’m not
an enthusiast in the sense I believe for sure any of this will happen. I’m an enthusiast
because it makes sense now to try.”

The day after meeting with Milner, I went to the Berkeley campus to meet the
beneficiaries of his Breakthrough Listen largesse. Andrew Siemion, the director of the
Berkeley SETI Research Center, is ideally positioned to take the search for intelligent
aliens to a new level. In addition to his Berkeley appointment, he has been named to
head up SETI investigations at the SETI Institute itself, including operations at the ATA.
Siemion, 38, looks the part of a next-gen SETI master; he has a shaved head, a compact
build, and a thin gold chain discreetly visible above the buttons of his fitted shirt. While
careful to credit the decades of research by Tarter and her colleagues at the SETI
Institute, he’s keen to distinguish where SETI is going from where it has been. The
initial search was inspired by the possibility of a connection—reaching out in hope of
finding someone reaching back. SETI 2.0 is trying to determine whether technological
civilization is part of the cosmic landscape, like black holes, gravitational waves, or any
other astronomical phenomenon.

“We’re not looking for a signal,” Siemion says. “We’re looking for a property of the
universe.”

Breakthrough Listen is by no means abandoning the conventional search for radio

transmissions, he tells me; on the contrary, it’s doubling down on it, dedicating to SETI
roughly a quarter of the viewing time on two huge single-dish radio telescopes in West
Virginia and Australia. Siemion is even more excited about a partnership with the new
MeerKAT telescope in South Africa, an array of 64 radio dishes, each more than twice
the size of the ATA’s. By piggybacking on observations conducted by other scientists,
Breakthrough Listen will conduct a 24/7 stakeout of a million stars, dwarfing previous
SETI radio searches. Powerful as it is, MeerKAT is just a precursor to radio astronomy’s
dream machine: the Square Kilometre Array, which sometime in the next decade will
link hundreds of dishes in South Africa with thousands of antennas in Australia,
creating the collecting area of a single dish more than a square kilometer, or about 247
acres.

There are other SETI approaches Siemion tells me about—Breakthrough Listen

partnerships with telescopes in China, Australia, and the Netherlands, and new
technologies in development at Berkeley, the SETI Institute, and elsewhere to look for
optical and infrared signals. The gist, echoed by other scientists I talk with, is that SETI
is undergoing a transformation from cottage industry to global enterprise.

Most important, empowered and inspired by the accelerating rate of technological

development in our own civilization, we are coming to see the target of the quest in a
different light. For 60 years we’ve been waiting for ET to phone Earth. But the stark
truth is that ET probably has no compelling reason to try to communicate with us, any
more than we feel a heartfelt need to extend a greeting to a colony of ants. We may feel
technologically mature compared with our past, but compared with what may be out
there in the universe, we’re still in diapers. Any civilization that we would be able to
detect will likely be millions, perhaps billions, of years ahead of us.

“We’re like trilobites, looking for more trilobites,” says Seth Shostak, a senior
astronomer at the SETI Institute.

What we should be looking for is not a message from ET, but signs of ET just going
about the business of being ET, alien and intelligent in ways that we may not yet
comprehend but may still be able to perceive, by looking for evidence of technology—
so-called technosignatures.
The most obvious technosignatures would be ones we’ve produced, or can imagine
producing, ourselves. Avi Loeb of Harvard University, who chairs the Breakthrough
Starshot advisory board, has noted that if another civilization were using similar laser
propulsion to sail through space, its Starshot-like beacons would be visible to the edge
of the universe. Loeb also has suggested looking for the spectral signatures of
chlorofluorocarbons soiling the atmosphere of aliens who failed to live past the
technological diaper stage.

“Based on our own behavior, there must be many civilizations that killed themselves by
harnessing technologies that led to their own destruction,” he tells me when I visit him.
“If we find them before we destroy our own planet, that would be very informative,
something we could learn from.”

On a cheerier note, we could learn a great deal more from civilizations that have solved
their energy problem. At a NASA conference on technosignatures (yes, after a quarter
century, NASA too is getting back into the SETI game), there was talk about looking for
the waste heat from megastructures that we have imagined creating in the future. A
Dyson sphere—solar arrays surrounding a star and capturing all of its energy—around
our own sun would generate enough power in a second to supply our current demand
for a million years. Learning that other civilizations have already accomplished such
feats might provide us some hope.

Still, space is vast, and so is time. Even with our ever more powerful computers and
telescopes, SETI’s expanded agenda, and the gravity assist of a hundred Yuri Milners,
we may never encounter an alien intelligence. On the other hand, the first intimation of
life from a distant planet feels thrillingly close.

“You never know what’s going to happen,” Seager says. “But I know that something
great is around those stars.”

Contributing writer Jamie Shreeve bets we’ll find hints of extraterrestrial life before 2030.
Spencer Lowell has constellations tattooed on one arm. Dana Berry has imagined unseen
scenes in space for National Geographic and other publications.

      

THE BEST OF NATIONAL

GEOGRAPHIC DELIVERED TO
YOUR INBOX
 Sign up for more inspiring photos, stories, and special offers
from National Geographic.

Enter your email

By signing up for this email, you are agreeing to receive news, offers, and
information from National Geographic Partners, LLC and our partners. Click
here to visit our Privacy Policy. Easy unsubscribe links are provided in every
email.