Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 394 views

    Paper 1 Marking Criteria 2021

    Uploaded by

    Aditya Mehra
    This document outlines the marking criteria for Paper 1 Guided Textual Analysis for both Higher and Standard Level exams. It includes 4 criteria (Understanding and Interpretation, Analysis and Evaluation, Focus and Organization, and Language) each scored from 0 to 5 marks. For each criteria and score, brief descriptors are provided explaining the level of understanding, analysis, organization, and language usage demonstrated in a student's response.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Paper 1 Marking Criteria 2021

    Uploaded by

    Aditya Mehra
    394 views2 pages
    This document outlines the marking criteria for Paper 1 Guided Textual Analysis for both Higher and Standard Level exams. It includes 4 criteria (Understanding and Interpretation, Analysis and Evaluation, Focus and Organization, and Language) each scored from 0 to 5 marks. For each criteria and score, brief descriptors are provided explaining the level of understanding, analysis, organization, and language usage demonstrated in a student's response.

    Original Description:

    IBDP English

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines the marking criteria for Paper 1 Guided Textual Analysis for both Higher and Standard Level exams. It includes 4 criteria (Understanding and Interpretation, Analysis and Evaluation, Focus and Organization, and Language) each scored from 0 to 5 marks. For each criteria and score, brief descriptors are provided explaining the level of understanding, analysis, organization, and language usage demonstrated in a student's response.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    394 views2 pages

    Paper 1 Marking Criteria 2021

    Uploaded by

    Aditya Mehra
    This document outlines the marking criteria for Paper 1 Guided Textual Analysis for both Higher and Standard Level exams. It includes 4 criteria (Understanding and Interpretation, Analysis and Evaluation, Focus and Organization, and Language) each scored from 0 to 5 marks. For each criteria and score, brief descriptors are provided explaining the level of understanding, analysis, organization, and language usage demonstrated in a student's response.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    PAPER 1 GUIDED TEXTUAL ANALYSIS MARKING CRITERIA (HL and SL)

    Criterion A: Understanding Criterion B: Analysis and Criterion C: Focus and Criterion D: Language
    and interpretation evaluation organisation

    Marks Descriptor Marks Descriptor Marks Descriptor Marks Descriptor


    0 The work does not reach a 0 The work does not reach a 0 The work does not reach a 0 The work does not reach a
    standard described by the standard described by the standard described by the standard described by the
    descriptors below. descriptors below. descriptors below. descriptors below.
    1 The response demonstrates little 1 The response is descriptive and/or 1 Little organization is 1 Language is rarely clear and
    understanding of the literal demonstrates little relevant apparent. No appropriate; there are many
    meaning of the text. analysis of textual features and/or discernible focus is apparent. errors in grammar, vocabulary
    writer’s choices. and sentence construction and
    little sense of register and
    References to the text are style.
    infrequent or are rarely
    appropriate.

    2 The response demonstrates some 2 The response contains some 2 Some organization is apparent. 2 Language is sometimes clear
    understanding of the literal appropriate analysis of textual There is little focus. and carefully chosen; grammar,
    meaning of the text. features and/or writer’s choices, vocabulary and sentence
    but is reliant on description. construction are fairly accurate,
    although errors and
    References to the text are at times inconsistencies are apparent;
    appropriate. the register and style are to
    some extent appropriate to the
    task.

    3 The response demonstrates an 3 The response demonstrates a 3 The analysis is adequately 3 Language is clear and carefully
    understanding of the literal generally appropriate analysis of organized in a generally chosen with an adequate
    meaning. There is a satisfactory textual features and/or writer’s coherent manner. There is degree of accuracy in
    choices, with occasional insights. grammar, vocabulary and
    interpretation of some implications some focus.
    sentence construction despite
    of the text. some lapses; register and style
    are mostly appropriate to the
    References to the text are task.
    generally relevant and mostly
    support the candidate’s ideas.
    PAPER 1 GUIDED TEXTUAL ANALYSIS MARKING CRITERIA (HL and SL)

    4 The response demonstrates a 4 The response demonstrates an 4 The analysis is well organized 4 Language is clear and carefully
    thorough understanding of the appropriate and at times insightful and mostly coherent. The chosen, with a good degree of
    literal meaning. There is a analysis of textual features and/or analysis is adequately focused. accuracy in grammar,
    writer’s choices. There is a good vocabulary and sentence
    convincing interpretation
    evaluation of how such features construction; register and style
    of many implications of the text. and/or choices shape meaning. are consistently appropriate to
    the task.
    References to the text are
    relevant and support the
    candidate’s ideas.

    5 The response demonstrates a 5 The response demonstrates an 5 The analysis is effectively 5 Language is very clear,
    thorough and perceptive insightful and organized and coherent. effective, carefully chosen and
    understanding of the convincing analysis of textual The analysis is well focused. precise, with a high degree of
    accuracy in grammar,
    literal meaning. There is features and/or writer’s
    vocabulary and sentence
    a convincing and insightful choices. There is a very good construction; register and style
    interpretation of larger implications evaluation of how such features are effective and appropriate to
    and subtleties of the text. and/or choices shape meaning. the task.

    References to the text are well-


    chosen and effectively support the
    candidate’s ideas.

    Total: 20 Marks

    You might also like