Differentia: Review of Italian Thought Differentia: Review of Italian Thought
Differentia: Review of Italian Thought Differentia: Review of Italian Thought
1999
Recommended Citation
Viano, Maurizio (1999) "Streetwalking on a Ruined Map by Giuliana Bruno," Differentia: Review of Italian
Thought: Vol. 8 , Article 37.
Available at: https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/differentia/vol8/iss1/37
This document is brought to you for free and open access by Academic Commons. It has been accepted for
inclusion in Differentia: Review of Italian Thought by an authorized editor of Academic Commons. For more
information, please contact [email protected], [email protected].
REVIEWS
I
map. As the usual points of reference of Naples. In yet another sense, the
are missing, the activity of the know- book is an immense act of emigrant
ing subject, Bruno's subjectivity, love towards Naples; Italian history
comes to the fore. In fact, one regrets and geo-politics (South vs. North
that most books are written on whol- axis); cultural methodology and epis-
1y legible maps and thus operate temology; and various problems in
within the illusion of objective schol- film theory such as that of female
arship. Utilizing filmic fragments, spectatorship which Bruno wrenches
stills, scripts and other writings such away from a Lacanian fixity and
as novelizations, tickets, posters, launches into a mobile metropolitan
Bruno engages in a fractal explo- space of trains, arcades, boulevards .
ration of the area in which text and Pushing on the metaphor of the
context meet and succeeds in offering hypertext, we discover concepts
an engaging picture of Notari as she which readily apply to Bruno's
operated in the belly of Naples book's quintessential movement:
(Serao's II ventre) a city caught in the interface and navigation. Unlike
process of becoming "metropolitan what happens in the metaphysics of
texture" and related, as Notari's suc- homogeneity, the concept of interface
cess among Italian immigrants testi- makes us realize the heterogeneity of
fies, to the Ur-metropolis New York . the real: every process, every transla-
Let us now talk about the macro- tion, every relation in the order of
historical. Association is the elemen- interfering. Streetwalking on a Ruined
tary process at the heart of the inter- Map is about the creation of interfaces
pretive activity: to give a text its between film authorship and specta-
meaning, one connects it to other torship and other cultural produc-
texts and therefore creates a hyper- tions. The hypertextual dimension of
text. In many cases, however, the illu- Bruno's exploration effects a change
sory completeness of the map limits in the mode of consumption required
the scope and horizon of the hyper- from the reader: from reading to
textual dimension. "navigating," as computer specialists
The movement of the book is con- call it. As the experience of sailing
sciously hypertextual. As in Brian navigation is perhaps less for the sub-
Eno' s music, one insistent motif altern groups than streetwalking, we
flakes off into layers of sound to cre- can say that Bruno popularizes and
ate an auditory palimpsest, Bruno's "feminizes" the metaphor for hyper-
microhistorical research branches out textual consumption: passeggiata.
rhizomatically and forays into territo- As if flashing a series of postcards
ries and problematics touched upon or glimpses from a train, and frames
by Notari's practice and theory-con- of panoramic shots, Streetwalkingon a
tained-in-her-practice. Streetwalking Ruined Map invites its readers to
on a Ruined Map is thus also a series indulge in the art of fianerie,passeggia-
of "inferential walks" (a term bor- ta with a camera. Intriguingly, how-
rowed from Eco) into the intercon- ever, the camera we are invited to
nectedness of film, architecture, pho- take along does not have a fixed focal
tography, and painting-the history length but alternates, with a zoom-
reviews 361