COPY RIGHT

2019IJIEMR.Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IJIEMR must

be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including
reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new
collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted
component of this work in other works. No Reprint should be done to this paper, all copy
right is authenticated to Paper Authors
IJIEMR Transactions, online available on 23rd Apr 2019. Link
:http://www.ijiemr.org/downloads.php?vol=Volume-08&issue=ISSUE-04
Title: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF G+4 COMMERCIAL BUILDING BY USING ETABS

Volume 08, Issue 04, Pages: 332–336.

Paper Authors
P.LEELA KRISHNA, G.SANTHOSHI KUMARI AND B.SRINIVASA REDDY

USE THIS BARCODE TO ACCESS YOUR ONLINE PAPER

To Secure Your Paper As Per UGC Guidelines We Are Providing A Electronic

Bar Code
Vol 08 Issue04, Apr 2019 ISSN 2456 – 5083 www.ijiemr.org
 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF G+4 COMMERCIAL BUILDING
BY USING ETABS
1 2 3
P.LEELA KRISHNA , G.SANTHOSHI KUMARI AND B.SRINIVASA REDDY
1
Department of Civill Engineering, Welfare Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, AP,
India
2
Department of Civil Engineering, NSRIT, Visakhapatnam, AP, India
3
Graduation Student Of Civil Department, Welfare Engineering College,
Visakhapatnam, AP, India
E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

ABSTRACT
Structural Analysis is a branch which involves in the determination of behavior of structures in order
to predict the responses of different structural csomponents due to the effect of loads. Each and every
structure will be subjected to either one or the groups of loads, the various kinds of loads normally
considered are dead load, live load, wind load IS:875-1987 Part1, 2, 3, earthquake load(IS:1893-2016).
ETABS (Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building System) is a software which is
incorporated with all the major analysis engines that are static, dynamic, Linear and non-linear, etc.
This Computer software’s are also being used for the calculation of forces, bending moment, stress,
strain &deformation or deflection for a complex structural system & this Software is used to analyze
and design the buildings.
Keywords: Etabs, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Non-linear Analysis, Linear Analysis.

1. INTRODUCTION function over its design life time. Nowadays

The term building in Civil Engineering is used to various software packages are available in the
mean a structure having various components like market for analyzing and designing practically
foundation, walls, columns, floors, roofs, doors, all types of structures viz. RISA, STAADPRO,
windows, ventilators, stairs lifts, various types of ETABS, STRUDL, MIDAS, SAP and RAM
surface finishes etc. Structural analysis and etc.
design are used to produce a structure capable of LOADS ON THE STRUCTURE
resisting all applied loads without failure during A.DEAD LOAD: (IS:875-1987) PART-1
its intended life. Prior to the analysis and design The dead load comprises of the weight of the
of any structure, necessary information regarding walls, partition floors finishes, false ceiling,
supporting soil has to be collected by means of false floors and the other permanent
geotechnical investigation. A geotechnical site constructions in the building. The dead loads
investigation is a process of collecting may be calculated from the dimensions of
information and evaluating the conditions of the various members and their unit weight. The unit
site for the purpose of designing and constructing weight of plain concrete and reinforced
the foundation for a structure. concrete made with sand and gravel or crushed
Structural engineers are facing the challenges natural stone aggregate may be taken as
of striving for most efficient and economical 24KN/m and 25KN/m respectively.
design with accuracy in solution while ensuring IMPOSED LOADS: (IS:875-1987) PART-2
that the final design of a building and the The Imposed load is produced by the intended
building must be serviceable for its intended use or occupancy of a building including the
Vol 08 Issue04, Apr 2019 ISSN 2456 – 5083 Page 332
weight of movable partitions, distribution and
concentrated loads, the load due to impact and
vibration and dust loads. Imposed loads do not
include loads due to the wind, seismic activity,
snow and loads imposed due to temperature Apply DL+LL+ SIDL +EQ+WL
changes to which the structure will be subjected Using IS codes as per site conditions
to creep and shrinkage of the structure, the
differential settlements to which the structure Form load combinations
may undergo. & assign support conditions
WIND LOAD: (IS:875-2015) PART-3
Wind is air in motion relative to the surface of the Analyze the structure
earth. The primary cause of wind is traced to the & apply load + deflection checks
earth's rotation and differences in terrestrial
radiation. The radiation effects are primarily
responsible for convention either upward or Design the Structure
downwards. The wind generally blows horizontal & apply design checks
to the ground at high wind speeds. Since vertical MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR FRAMES OF
components of atmospheric motion are relatively WHOLE STRUCTURE
small, the term 'wind' denotes almost exclusively
the horizontal wind, vertical winds are always
identified as such. The wind speeds are assessed
with the aid of anemometers or anemograph
which are installed at meteorological
observations at heights generally varying from 10
to 30 meters above ground.
METHODOLOGY
Analysis and Design in Etabs:
The procedure carried out for Modeling and
analyzing the structure involves the
following flow chart.

Prepare the beam- column

plan with the centerline ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame
Design IS 456:2000 Beam
Section Design (Envelope)
Enter grid spacing in Etabs Beam Element Details
i.e. centerline spacing of beams

Enter concrete, Rebar properties Section Properties

& Beam-column sizes b h bf ds dct dcb h
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
450 1200 450 0 40 40 1200
Model the structure in seconds
using Etabs quick drawing tools
Vol 08 Issue04, Apr 2019 ISSN 2456 – 5083 Page 333
 Material Properties End-I End-I MiddleMiddle End-J End-J
Design Station Design Station Design Station
Vu Loc Vu Loc Vu Loc
kN mm kN mm kN Mm
Design Code Parameters 121.22 1186 0.4 3953.3 457.38 4348.7
ɣC ɣS 99 66
1.5 1.15 UDCo UDCo UDCo
n50 n2 n2
Flexural Reinforcement for Major Axis
Torsion Reinforcement
Moment, Mu3
Shear
End-I End- Middle Mid End-J End-
Rebar Asvt /s
Rebar I Rebar dle Rebar J mm²/m
Area Reb Area Reb Area Reb
821.05
ar ar ar
mm² % mm² % mm² % Shear Design
Top Stati Reb Mu Vc +
(+2 0 0 918 0.17 2181 0.4 on ar Shear Pu kN- Vu Vc
ID Vs
Axis) Loca mm Combo kN kN kN
m kN
Bot (-2 1989 0.37 1305 0.24 0 0 tion ²/m
Axis) Leg UDCon 117.5 106. - 33.8 131.7
Top 575 103.
1 42 281 1 2259 195 595
Flexural Design Moment, Mu3
End-I End-I Middl Middl End-J End-J Leg UDCon 228.6 131. - 67.5 263.3
Top 575 90.5
Desig Statio e e Desig Statio 2 42 369 1 114 914
Desig Statio 879
n Mu n Loc n M n Loc n Mu n Loc Top Leg 575 UDCon 108.8 - 85.2 33.6 131.5
u
kN-m mm kN-m mm kN-m mm 3 41 204 82.8 328 464 864
Top 3953. - Leg UDCon 835.0 - 135. 505.7
(+2 0 1186-309.9 1103. 5480 Top 575 615 359. 598
3 4 38 487 783
Axis) 4 2297 3
Comb UDCo UDCo UDCo Leg UDCon 1270. 109 - 311. 1201.
o n50 n49 n41 Top 575 694. 279
5 42 7438 0.4 0392
Bot (- 1581. 2774 2
2 994.4 0 671.4 0 5480 Leg UDCon 483.6 - 97.4 128. 498.7
3 Top 575 144.
Axis) 6 37 245 201 61 9
Comb UDCo UDCo UDCo 7
o n2 n42 n50 Leg UDCon 589.6 - 237. 130. 500.8
Top 7 575 37 295 440. 148 718 98
Shear Reinforcement for Major Shear, Vu2 7
UDCon 248.9 -
End-I Middle End-J - 36.4 181.3
Botto Leg 851.
197. 181.
Rebar Asv /s Rebar Asv /s Rebar Asv /s m 1 02 42 706 7 3873 334 873
mm²/m mm²/m mm²/m
498.8 821.05 806.94 Botto Leg 634. UDCon 440.0 - - 71.7 287.7
285. 287.
Design Shear Force for Major Shear, Vu2 m 2 18 42 072 147 561
1 7561

Vol 08 Issue04, Apr 2019 ISSN 2456 – 5083 Page 334

Stati Reb Mu Vc +
on ar Shear Pu Vu Vc Boundary Element Check
ID kN- Vs
Loca mm Combo kN kN kN Statio Edge Gove
m kN Mu Stress Stress
tion ²/m n Lengt rning Pu
ID kN- Comp Limit
Botto Leg 575 UDCon 317.0 132. 118. 37.7 135.7 Locati h Com kN
m MPa MPa
m 3 41 337 7 9026 868 268 on (mm) bo
Botto Leg 575 UDCon 380.3 - - 126. 496.7 Top– Leg 0 UDC 48.62 -2.2 0.52 7
m 4 38 847 469. 389. 557 37 Left 1 on47 4
5 4355 Top– Leg 230 UDC 188.4 81.8 7.52 7
Botto Leg UDCon 1625. - - 318. 1208. Right 1 on47 143
575 283. 721. Top– Leg 0 UDC 247.1 - 1.17 7
m 5 42 659 4 5646 337 097 Left 2 on31 168 14.1
Botto Leg 575 UDCon 731.8 -104 - 133. 503.7 Top– Leg 0 UDC 336.7 44.1 2.07 7
m 6 38 85 171. 546 269 Right 2 on31 105
5573 9 Top– Leg 230 UDC 108.8 - 7.01 7
Botto Leg 575 UDCon 552.9 175. 234. 129. 500.1 Left 3 on39 204 82.8
m 7 37 722 8 0586 989 69 Top– Leg 0 UDC 108.3 19.6 2.27 7
Right 3 on39 257
Top– Leg 0 UDC 812.3 -139 2.31 7
Left 4 on27 283
Top– Leg 0 UDC 1170. 254. 3.62 7
Right 4 on270813 3
Top– Leg 0 UDC 2233. -168 1.96 7
Left 5 on278058
Top– Leg 0 UDC 2301. 33.3 1.9 7
Right 5 on272828
Top– Leg 0 UDC 573.6 -4.2 1.14 7
Left 6 on3 776
Top– Leg 0 UDC 716.5 2.7 1.41 7
Right 6 on3 66
Top– Leg 0 UDC 1243. - 2.77 7
Left 7 on393634 66.7
Top– Leg 0 UDC 972.5 224. 3.07 7
Right 7 on39 51 6
Botto Leg UDC 249.0 -
m– 230 133. 11.82 7
Left 1 on2 573 3
Botto Leg UDC 80.38
m– 0 29.6 2.81 7
Right 1 on2 79
Botto Leg UDC 589.7 -
m– 0 139. 4.79 7
Left 2 on36 562 8
Botto Leg 0 UDC 440.0 57.8 2.7 7

Vol 08 Issue04, Apr 2019 ISSN 2456 – 5083 Page 335

Statio Edge Gove Mu Stress Stress Statio Edge Gove Mu Stress Stress
n Lengt rning Pu n Lengt rning Pu
ID kN- Comp Limit ID kN- Comp Limit
Locati h Com kN m MPa MPa Locati h Com kN
on (mm) bo on (mm) bo m MPa MPa

m– 2 on36 812 Right

Right
Botto Leg 230 UDC 194.2 - 7.58 7 CONCLUSION
m– 3 on40 31 82.1 1) The structural design is based on the ETABS
Left and the theory of LIMIT STATE METHOD
Botto Leg UDC 317.0 132. which provide adequate strength, serviceability,
m– 230 12.28 7 and durability besides the economy.
Right 3 on40 337 7
2) The preparation of the project has provided
Botto Leg UDC 601.5 - an excellent opportunity to emerge ourselves in
m– 0 275. 2.62 7 planning &designing of G+4 commercial
Left 4 on2 408 8
building.
Botto Leg UDC 620.5 3) This project has given an opportunity to
m– 0 79.3 1.63 7 recollect and coordinate the various
Right 4 on2 626
methods of designing and engineering
Botto Leg 0 UDC 2384. - 2.01 7 principles which we have learned in our
m– 5 on2 8649 81.7 lower classes.
Left 4) The displacement, shear force, bending
Botto Leg UDC 2063. moment variation has been shown by ETABS.
m– 0 92.5 1.76 7 5) If any beam and column fail, the dimensions
Right 5 on2 1083
of beam and column should be changed and
Botto Leg 0 UDC 977.9 - 2.36 7 reinforcement detailing can be produced.
m– 6 on2 789 86.5 6) By this project we are able to identify,
Left formulate, and solve complex engineering
Botto Leg 0 UDC 482.1 5 0.97 7 problems by applying principles of engineering.
m– 6 on2 799
Right
Botto Leg UDC 783.8
m– 0 -23 1.65 7
Left 7 on31 332
Botto Leg 0 UDC 855.9 18.5 1.77 7
m– 7 on31 671

Vol 08 Issue04, Apr 2019 ISSN 2456 – 5083 Page 336