Sandiganbayan Motion
Sandiganbayan Motion
Sandiganbayan Motion
SANDIGANBAYAN
QUEZON CITY
FIFTH DIVISION
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
Plaintiff,
Criminal Case Nos. SB-II-
CRM-915
-versus- For: Violation of Section 3 (g) of
Republic Act No. 3019
LUKE PERALTA
Accused.
1
5. Having been merely culled from the wordings of RA
3019, the allegations in the Information are mere legal conclusions.
2
would indicate the close intimacy between the discharge
of the offender’s official duties and the commission of the
offense charged, in order to qualify the crime as having
been committed in relation to public office, are
controlling.”1
PRAYER
By:
1
Ibid., at 474.
2
Reyes v. Atienza, G.R. No. 152243, 23 September 2005, 407 SCRA
670.
3
Roll No. 12345
MCLE Compliance No. 678356; (01/10/2020)
[email protected]
NOTICE OF HEARING
PHIL DUNPHY
Private Complainant
New Manila, Quezon City, Metro Manila
Copy furnished:
4
PHIL DUNPHY
Private Complainant
New Manila, Quezon City, Metro Manila