MAYAN TREASURE-SECTION I ABSTRACT HARLESTON

Section I Summary presents findings that indicate that the designers of

Teotihuacan were Mayan. Identification was made possible by
isolating the unit of measure used by the constructors. This permitted
comparison of redundant dimensions in the architecture, which led to
deduction of the mathematical capabilities of the designers.
Astronomical counts form a chronological model of the solar system.

1.) A unit of linear measure was found: the Standard Teotihuacan Unit
(STU) of 1.0594(6) meters (41.7111 English inches.) More than
7,000 conversions were made of dimensions in the “Ceremonial”
Zone: 1,924,582 square meters (1,714,608 square STU = 756 X 2,268
STU.) Rounding of dimensions of stone structures were held to less
than the official photogrammetric aerial map restoration (accuracy,
scale of 1:2000, is +/- 50 centimeters (see Appendix 3.) Many
repeating dimensions are factored by prime numbers 2, 3, 5 and 7.

2.) Dimensions of Teotihuacan appear in the Mayan Dresden Codex,

pp. 71 to 73, in the form of 13 counts, corrections every 21,600 days
(three Katuns) to obtain 59-year Jupiter/Saturn conjunction counts
as multiples of 21,546 days, a Mayan approximation. To achieve
precision Mayans used integral numbers, later corrected by adding
or subtracting integral days after long-term lapses.

3.) The design triangle of Teotihuacan is formed by the two largest

pyramids and the Great Avenue. This triangle defines two 378-day
Saturn orbits as 756 STU, the number of 399-day Jupiter orbits for
the planet to circle one-third of the Zodiac as 720 STU; and the base
leg 231 STU, the number of Katuns to reach the eleventh elapsed
count of 400 Saturns of 151,200 days between zero reference in 3,114
B.C. and the 4,400th Saturn in 1,441 A.D. The twelfth and last date
was in May of 1,855 A.D. for 4,800 Saturn orbits (uncorrected.)

4.) The “Ceremonial” Zone presents (north/south) the 13-Katun count

93,600 days, encoded twice as “936 STU.” Also shown is a Mayan

vii
 ABSTRACT - SECTION I (Contd.)

Oxlahkatun of 1,872,000 days encoded as “1,872 STU.” Distan-

ces for Mercury, Venus and Mars orbital counts are given in STU.

5.) In three dimensions the Zone registers volumes in cubic STU that
I have named “Numerical Arks.” The volume of this integral
numerical box “contains” Saturn synodic orbits, Jupiter synodic
orbits and Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions of 7,182 days (one Katun
minus 18 days.) “Ark” volume of height 57 STU can be factored
to give the reduced scaled area of an earth sphere, the synodic
orbital time of the moon and the number of visible Jupiter/Saturn
conjunction counts (every third conjunction.)

6.) Painted murals exhibit Mayan solar eclipse day-counts (Dresden

Codex.) On factoring the total count by the Jupiter number 720 and
the synodic orbit of Mercury of 117 days (Dresden Codex) the mural
renders the same precision lunar orbit given by the Dresden Codex
and by stone glyphs carved at Palenque’s Palace: 29.5308642 days.

7.) Mayan Long Counts that give anniversary dates for twelve sets of
400 Saturns (multiples of 151,200 days = 1.1.0.0.0) are the overall
Teotihuacan design basis, that also rests on 378 STU, one side of the
“Citadel,” that we believe was a “Great Quadrangle of Saturn.”

8.) Dating at Teotihuacan is proposed, based on registers of 400-Saturn

anniversaries at Copán and Palenque (631 A.D.) and at Edzna
recorded in 1,027 A.D. (see Fig.5, pp.16, Section I.)

9.) This Summary proposes significant new Mayan dates (Fig.5,)

importance of the number “9” (Fig.12) and illustrations of the
corrected Mayan Zodiac, pp. 23-24, Paris Codex (see Figs. 7 & 10.)

10) For additional data, please consult references listed in the partial
Bibliography, Appendix 2, Section I.
pp.viii
ORIGINAL FILE REF: 01-12/TEO
DISK: MAYTRESU-05T2ED // reedited 09-VIII-06
 MAYAN TREASURE
Space and Time Unified at Teotihuacan
Research Summary No.5: 1971 - 2006

Teotihuacan is a monumental pyramidal zone forty-five ki-

lometers from downtown Mexico City, less than an hour by
car. Data showing the 192-city-block area to be Mayan was
gathered between 1971 and 1984. More indications were found
in 1996 and 1998. Additional confirmations appeared in 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 (see Bibliography, pp.22-26, below
and supplemental Bibliography, Section III, p.29.)

Ongoing research was compared by studying Mayan astro-

nomical and calendrical data. Field research included 352
visits to the Teotihuacan Valley (1947 to 2003) and over two
hundred field excursions between 1971 and 2003.

Dimensions were laid out using a unit of one meter, six

centimeters: 1.0594(6) m., named a Standard Teotihuacan Unit
(STU.) The largest single structure is a quadrangle whose side
in STU equals the number of days (earth revolutions) for
Saturn to reappear overhead: 378 = 6 times 7 times 9.

It was recognized that a great rectangle forms the “Ceremonial

Zone,” measuring not only two by six orbits of Saturn but
also twelve Great Quadrangles whose four sides total a whole
number: four times 378; i.e., 1,512. This number defines time
periods, spherical areas, geometrical codes and counts of
events.

The builders laid out a series of 36 three-dimensional rectan-

gular boxes that I have named "Numerical Arks."

pp.1
MAYAN TREASURE

An “Ark” can "contain" a series of numbers covering more

than 250,000 years of solar system planetary relationships.

Mayans used the same number for differing time and space
measurements. Enclosed in an “Ark” 57 STU high is a factor
for calculating the moon’s orbit. This number is "137," a con-
stant used by modern physics.

Belief in “scientific" knowledge can be a fatal supposition: to

deny that any past civilization could possibly know as much as
we. Every day more previously tabú “possibilities” are con-
verted into probabilities by modern researchers. By no means
does this imply that Mayans knew the hydrogen fines constant.

In basic research results are unknown, therefore cannot be

predicted until after ingenious experiments have shown why,
or why not, previously assumed exceptions occur. The factor
"137" in the magna design is a factor in calculating a precision
value for the moon's orbital time. Mayan mathematicians may
have arrived at this knowledge intuitively or by tradition.

A major find indicated that Mayans designed Teotihuacan: a

Mayan text translated by Mediz Bolio, 1941, written in the 16th
century by elders. A figure found frequently at Teotihuacan
appears (Fig.1.) It represents 93,600 days, or one hundred
times "936." The Mayan text states "13 Katuns (of 7,200 days)
are the count of the sky in the great dark church of learning.
To ascend "9" is needed.”

Seven years were dedicated to combing hills and mountains

pp.2
MAYAN TREASURE

searching for these figures, made from holes pecked in stone to

form a double circle and a cruciform cross, often with twenty
holes per arm plus a center dot: eighty-one = 9 times 9
(Gaitan, et al, 1974, see Bibliography)

A Univac geodesic-arc computer program was applied, with a

polar diameter of 12 million STU's (12,713,557 meters)
corrected for the Clark spheroid. Great circles guided us to
37 precalculated marked points, at distances up to 2,750
kilometers from the Great Pyramids of Mexico.

In 1997 a floor was excavated near the "Sun" Pyramid by

Linda Manzanilla. At least 18 figures were pecked or
scratched into the floor. Before I saw them, I told two
witnesses that there should be double, triple, quadruple or
more circles. If two circles mean 13 Katuns, then four circles
could be 21 Katuns, a count of 151,200 days. Photographs
confirmed that these designs are on the previously buried floor.
In 1974, a map (Fig.2) of the “Ceremonial Zone” was drawn in
Mayan units. The map shows the number “936” twice. The
sum is “1,872.” After a Katun of 7,200 days Mayans used
Niktekatun (or “Baktun”) to name a period of 144,000 days.
Thirteen Niktekatuns are one Oxlah-katun: 1,872,000 days, a
thousand times the marked “1,872,” or 400 cycles of 13 Tuns of
360 days = 5,200 Tuns. Fig.2 was redrawn in 1998.

In the 1990’s excavations revealed a precolumbian concrete

floor surrounding the Great Pyramid. Its level was 57 STU’s
below the original summit, that fortunately had been
conserved. From the secret cave underneath it the Pyramid
measures 63 STU's high (see Fig. 3.)
pp.3
MAYAN TREASURE

From the base of the “Moon” pyramid down to the Citadel’s

No. 3 pyramid (misnamed Quetzalcoatl in Aztec) is 30 vertical
STU. For an averaged “Ark” the height could have been
marked halfway between the “Moon’s” base and the No.3
pyramid’s base (Tompkins, ’76, pp.238-9, 243, 246, 251.) It
was logical that it should mark the level "2,166 STU."

It is marked by the concrete floor 57 units below the summit of

the pyramid, currently referred to as the “Sun.” Mayan
mathematics suggest it was a Pyramid of Jupiter, and also a
scale model of earth’s surface area. Naming at Teotihuacan
has been based on unproved assumptions, unfortunately using
Aztec terms. “Aztecs” are believed to have come into the
Valley of Mexico some 300 years later than the departure of the
residents, now speculated to have been 6th to 8th centuries A.D.

A three-dimensional map was made of the “Ceremonial" Zone

(Fig.3.) This “numerical box” has a volume equal to its length
(2,268) times its width (756) times its 57-STU height. The
volume is a number greater than 97 million. In days, it is the
equivalent of over a quarter million years.

This Ark’s volume “encloses” a “cargo” of whole numbers,

which include: (a) Jupiter orbits of 399 days; (b) Saturn orbits
of 378 days; (c) sky meetings of Jupiter with Saturn every
7,182 days; (d) the exact Mayan lunar orbit within 99.999%;
(e) 137, the divisor for obtaining the moon’s orbital time; and
(f) precision area of earth on a reduced scale of 1:100,000.

Mayans may have managed information systems recreated by

geniuses with neuronal computers, called “brains.”

pp.4
MAYAN TREASURE

I believe there were Mayan “Einsteins,” i.e., several super-

brains operating at Teotihuacan during its design stages.

In 2,001 another find. A great Plaza was named “of the

Moon” because the pyramid was alleged to have that name in
Nahuatl (Aztec.) The Aztecs, who showed up centuries later,
said their forefathers probably called the mound Meztlicue,
“moon pyramid.” Their “memory” was invention. The moon
is not seen to the north. This pyramid, the first to be erected,
was more likely to have been an observatory for never-setting
stars that circle the north star.

On the west side of the “Moon” Plaza are buildings excavated

in the 1960’s, one of them assigned an Aztec name: “Palace of
the Quetzal Butterfly” (Quetzalpapalotl.) The open patio is
surrounded by columns, whose designs do not include a single
quetzal bird (Fig.10.) Twenty-eight rectangular facings are
carved with profiles of falcons, identified by two double circles
that it carries on its beak, confirmed by ornithologists (Fig.4.)
The profiled columns bear double-circles in carved stone.

The four circles (see Fig.11) symbolize four times six times
seven times nine: 4 x 378, the number 1,512.

1,512 STU's are a walk around the Great Quadrangle of

Saturn, eighteen blocks south of the Falcon Patio. The other
ten column faces show a combination of figures representing
Mayan constellations that appear overhead on May 19th,
after midday sun has crossed the zenith at Teotihuacan’s
latitude (Calderon, ’84, ’89; cited in “El Universo de
Teotihuacan,” 1991, pp. 189-192, re the Paris Codex.)
pp.5
MAYAN TREASURE

Four panels frame the Falcon patio. In unique Teotihuacan

red, murals display a set of figures, resembling an arabic “3,”
a dark crescent in its center. Each figure can represent a triple
eclipse count of eleven thousand nine hundred sixty days,
tabulated in the Dresden Codex (also see "El Universo de
Teotihuacan," ’87, pp.103, Bibliography)

The three eclipse counts: 9,204 days, plus 1,424 plus 1,332
days = 11,960. Two counts are shown by dimensions in the
Saturn Quadrangle (the "Citadel.") The third count appears
on the Main Avenue (Street of the "Dead,") named by Spanish
colonials who didn't know the double meaning of "Miccaotli"
in Nahuatl, so associated it with tombs. But the term also
means "South to North," the Avenue's orientation.

Each panel presents 52 designs. Four panels can be 208 triple

eclipses of 33 years each…almost 7,000 years. Why did
Mayans register this number? The full impact of sacred art is
felt when we divide 208 x 11,960 (= 2,487,680 days) by two
highly significant Teotihuacan displays:

Separation of the two largest pyramids is 720 STU, a count of

Jupiter's 399-day orbits to cross one-third of the Zodiac. To
cross the Zodiac requires three times 720: 2,160 orbits, ten
times 216, a repeating module, the elevation above sea level of
the secret cave under the Great Pyramid: 2,288.4 meters =
2,160 STU. Mercury's synodic orbit is given in the Dresden
Codex, that registered three counts (Calderon, 1984.) In
Teotihuacan it was almost exactly 117 days, 9 x 13, significant
Mayan numbers. Dimensions in the "Citadel" (Fig. 6) and
elsewhere, show one, two and three synodic orbits: 117, 234,
351 in STU (see The Keystone, '84, p.111, Bibliography.)
pp.6
MAYAN TREASURE

If we divide the days counted on Falcon Patio murals by 720

times 117 what do we find? First, we learn that Mayans
registered numbers of cosmic significance. The number "208"
is 1,872 divided by 9, a factor of the Zone length (Fig. 2.) If we
divide the total eclipse time in days by the Jupiter number 720,
then by Mercury's synodic orbit time of 117 days, we obtain
29.5308642…, the precise lunar orbit to seven decimal places,
duplicating that reported by Teeple at Palenque (carved in
stone in the "Palace,") and in the Dresden Codex tables for
eclipses from 755 to 2000 A.D. Codex accuracy equals the
Naval Observatory data published in Washington, D.C.

In 2001: a tabulation (Fig.5, p.16 below) was made of Mayan

day-counts for the anniversaries of periods of 400 Saturn
orbits, beginning with the theoretical date in the year 3,114
B.C., which Eric Thompson borrowed from two others
(Martinez and Goodman) and renamed as his own count.

The date for the beginning of the last long count of the Mayans
was averaged by Thompson, changed two days to make it
independent, and proclaimed as the “MGT Constant: August
13, 3,114 B.C., 584,283 days after the initial declared date of
the Julian calendar beginning. But the “constant” MGT does
not correlate positions of the sun in the Mayan Zodiac as
corrected by Calderon (Mexico) in 1986, to replace Severin's
erroneous speculative interpretations of 1981.

Calderon set corrected zero date at September 13, -3,114 B.C.,

31 days after the MGT date, with a constant of 584,314 days.
(Calderon, ’82. Also see Fig.5 and Notes, pp. 16-18.) He cor-
related precolonial Mayan stelae, positions of Venus, stations

pp.7
MAYAN TREASURE

of Mars, lunar and post-conquest Mayan dating to show that

the introductory glyph carved on stone monuments indicates
the position of the sun with respect to star-groups called
"constellations.” Mayans used thirteen, not twelve groups as
assigned in the middle east by Arabians and Greeks .

Studies to date seem to have not recognized that Mayan Halach

kept the most important clues to themselves, memorized. A
Halach is a person that sees outside and inside simultaneously,
and cannot tell a lie. The term comes from Hal, “truth.”
Doubly truthful is Hal-Hal, later abbreviated. Mistranslated
by colonials, it was said to mean a “local boss, a commander,”
instead of the Mayan designation of “a wise person.”

To be conscious of external and internal conditions requires

discipline, non-verbal silent awareness,… presence, the mark
of a spiritual leader. An opening to wider awareness can be
discovered, a multi-dimensional vision that can be grasped by
anyone whose understanding surpasses memorized intellec-
tual knowledge.

Research can permit numerical values of geometrical figures

encoded for cosmic counts to be seen. The first is a simple
circle whose radius is sixty units. This becomes a dynamic
system in movement: a rotating sphere, a scale model of planet
earth, deformed by forces that make the pole-to-pole circle
shorter than the equatorial circumference.

The reality of our condition in space is captured objectively. It

evolves into seeing an irrational mathematical constant become
rational, an integral number value, perhaps at the speed of

pp.8
MAYAN TREASURE

light. However, it seems that Mayans carried this further.

A “simple" number, the product of 4, 6, 7 and 9, holds the key

to a cosmic vision that follows real lifelines: those of our
planet and its neighbors in an altered solar system. Mayan
Einsteins produced a monumental stone computer to freeze
relationships so that no earthquake could obliterate them.

The magnitude and separation of its components were so

spread out that each of its four basic parts would yield the
messages when the information became essential to survival of
that most complex of databank sources: the Halach, awakened
and doubly-aware. Mayan number systems interlock.

Long before moderns decided to use abbreviated logos Mayans

had simplified. Their “corporate logo” was two double circles
seen as “earpieces” on figurines, on pottery and murals,
repetitively carved on the Falcon Patio columns to show the
number “1,512” in code. This same number also appears as
20 times 756 (twenty double circles) on each of the ten west
column faces (Fig.10.) 15,120 times ten are: 151,200 days.

One circle is “378;” two are “756,” the center-to-center

distance between the two largest pyramids, a linear dimension
that is the hypotenuse of Teotihuacan’s design triangle. The
sides are “720” and “231” (Figs.2,3,7,8.) The multidimen-
sional interlocks with time: “720” is a count of Jupiter orbits
as well as two Tun of 360 days.

Another impressive Mayan combination: 21 Katuns of 7,200

days are 151,200 days, one hundred double earpieces or one

pp.9
MAYAN TREASURE

hundred walks around the Great Quadrangle of Saturn.

Mayan notations registered one Niktekatun -- 144,000 days --
plus one Katun -- 7,200 days, plus zero Tuns (360 days), zero
Uinals (20 days) and zero K’in (one day) as a basic day-count.

This Long Count: 1.1.0.0.0 = 151,200 days, equal to 400

synodic orbits of Saturn, 400 circles, or in word code, "boys."

The Maya-Quiché sacred book – the Popol-Vuh – speaks of 400

"boys.” Written in colonial times, this misinterpreted docu-
ment shows astronomical counts and constellation names in
Mayan, making sure that ignorant fanatic invaders could not
destroy everything, although they are very close to achieving
just that in Mexico and elsewhere, right down to our times.

Tabulation of 400-Saturn intervals (Fig.5 and Notes) proposes

a new set of parameters to students. Mayans constructed the
side of their Great Quadrangle as the same number for:

* The circumference in degrees of a rotating

universal sphere of radius “60”: 378
* The area of each of 120 triangles that form a
sphere of circumference 378 STU: 378
* Saturn’s orbit in days: 378
* The number of orbits of Jupiter in 21 Katuns: 378
* The number of additional days to correct
Jupiter’s count over the 21 Katuns: 378

[and three other multidimensionals (see Notes, p.18)]

pp.10
MAYAN TREASURE

Some questions for inquisitive minds:

1.) Why is the area of a universal sphere of radius sixty related

to the time of the lunar orbit? It is obtained by dividing
120 x 378 = 45,360 (area) by 6x16x16 = 29.53125, within 13
millionths of the Mayan precolumbian count: 29.5308642.

2.) Why do the orbits of the two satellites of Neptune add to

earth’s solar year: 365.242199120 days? This information was
restricted by NASA since Voyager’s onboard computers
reported Triton and Nereid in the 1980’s. Mayans (Calderon/
Paris Codex) knew 365.242…, but per Calderon they may have
corrected to 365.2422, a difference of one second per year.

3.) Why is the lunar orbit a function of the number used for
the hydrogen fines constant: 1 / 137? Why doesn’t modern
physics consider multidimensionals in its equations, but as-
sumes they disappeared in the first second of a questionable,
still speculative “big bang” that may turn out to be a whimper?

4.) Why are eclipse cycles and sunspots a function of 23?

23x520 = 11,960 days for eclipses; 23 earth revolutions around
the sun (two x 11-1/2 years) is the double sunspot cycle for
maximum activity as a group. Eleven years is an individual
sunspot cycle. Both were known to Mayans, using obsidian
filters to watch the sun rotate in 27 days (three cubed.)

5.) Why are long-term droughts a function of 312 x 365 earth

revolutions? Mayans knew that “good times” were short.
They were some 156 years out of 1,248. The last bad drought
cycle peaked in 776 A.D. The next Mayan probability is
centered on 2024 A.D., to begin around 2,011 and last 26 years.
p.11
MAYAN TREASURE

The number “312” is marked in the Great Quadrangle as a

four-sided figure, a square whose area is 97,344 (Fig.6.)
The third magna Mayan count is 97,344,000 Haab of 365 days,
a period of 260 Eras, each 73 Oxlahkatuns of 1,872,000 days.

The ending of the present Long Count (HMC Constant) will be

January 22, 2013 (not December of 2,012 alleged by “MGT,”
but changed by L. Schele using Sir Eric’s sly tactics.)

6.) Mayans show precession of the equinoxes as 101 Katuns

and 13 Zodiac sectors: 727,200 x 13 = 9,453,600 days.
Dividing by 365.2422 gives a precession time (backward
rotation of the north pole) of 25,883 solar years.

7.) The Nineveh Constant calculation: 2,268 x 1,000,000

divided by 240 = 9,450,000 days. Divided by 365.2422 =
25,873 solar years. Why is the Nineveh -- 2,268 -- equal
to the N/S length of Teotihuacan, six Saturn orbits? Did
the data come from a common source? Or tradition?

8.) Is the Platonic Great “Year” 25,920 Haab (vague years) =

9,460,800 days = 25,902 solar years? We believe it was earth
revolutions, but Plato never said so, nor his confidants. Plato
is one Katun more than the Mayan (9,460,800 less 9,453,600 =
7,200.) The difference between Plato and Nineveh is 10,800
days, possibly the original sidereal orbit of Saturn. Were
there precision preflood measures on earth?

Additional Mayan data (see Saturn tabulation, Fig.5, p.16):

The lag time of Jupiter behind Saturn’s orbit is 21 days per

synodic revolution (i.e., Saturn seen from earth.)
pp.12
MAYAN TREASURE

This means that each appearance of Saturn from behind the

sun will be followed by Jupiter in increasing delays of 21 days.
The first time Saturn reappears in 378 days; Jupiter in 399.
The second time, after 378 more days, Jupiter appears in 420,
or 42 days late. The third time Jupiter will be 63 days late.
These are the heights of the three main pyramids, now called
“Sun,” “Moon,” and “Quetzalcoatl” in the Aztec language
(Nahuatl.) It is evident that no Aztec names should have been
applied to Mayan designs.

The sequence continues to add multiples of 21 days, until on

the 19th revolution of Saturn the two planets are once more
together behind the sun. 19 multiples of “21” are in STU
dimensions in the Great Quadrangle of Saturn (the “Citadel.”)

It is intriguing that twelve of these lag numbers mark the

Katuns to define 400 Saturns. The Falcon Palace
(Quetzalpapalotl) exhibits counts of 21. If we convert Katuns
in days to "Long Counts" we see:

The First Long Count 1.1.0.0.0 = 21 Katuns: 151,200 days.

The Second Count is 2.2.0.0.0 = 42 Katuns: 302,400 days.
The Third Count is 3.3.0.0.0 = 63 Katuns: 1,200 Saturns on
day No. 453,600. The Katun sequence in sets of 7,200 days
follows the same series as day counts in the Great Quadrangle.

Saturn’s anniversaries were registered in Copan and Palen-

que (9.9.0.0.0 = June 11th, 613 A.D.) The Kahlay Katunob count
was renewed at Edzna (10.10.0.0.0 = June, 1027.) Official
dates speculated as approximate beginnings at Teotihuacan are
+/-200 B.C., with the “Moon” Plaza finished about 200 A.D.
p.13
MAYAN TREASURE

I propose dates were July 1st, 216 B.C. (7.7.0.0.0) and June 21st,
199 A.D. (8.8.0.0.0) – summer solstice (HMC chronological
Constant,) when the Falcon Patio may have been dedicated.

I propose Mayans celebrated great festivals on the 12th

anniversary: May 11th, 1855 A.D. to mark solar zenital
crossing at Latitude 17° North, that included Naranjo (Belice,)
Piedras Negras (Guatemala,) Ocosingo (Chiapas,) Monte
Alban (Oaxaca) and Juxtlahuaca (Guerrero.) Historians are
invited to look for these (see Notes, Fig.5.)

How can we not recognize Mayan genius, when we see that the
logo number 1,512 multiplied by Hunab Ku’s number “9” is
13,608: the Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions encapsulated in the
Numerical Ark with height 57 STU. 13,608 is also 216 x 63.
The date for 3,600 Saturns: 1,360,800 days, is one hundred
times the Jupiter/Saturn count, and the No.3 pyramid’s base
design is 60 x 60 = 3,600 Square STU.

Teotihuacan’s displays showed us that mathematical equa-

tions for the arc segments on an icosa-dodecahedrally marked
sphere are functions of the square root of the number 2, of the
arctangent of 2 and of phi, the golden mean (the square root of
5 plus 1, divided by 2.) A paper was prepared separately for
this (Bibliography, Dynamics of the Golden Mean, 2000.)

Below are twenty-two conclusions (Appendix 1) that cover

Mayan dimensions, archaeological geodesy and astronomy. It
is clear that Mayans did not deify time. They arrived at
brilliant correlations to interlock multi-dimensional concepts
that mark with high precision long-term repeating celestial
events while recognizing that the only objective values that can
pp.14
MAYAN TREASURE - SECTION I

be preserved are mathematical relationships.

Ignorant invaders from Europe were incapable of assimilating

their expertise, so Mayans very carefully made sure their
Halach were not identified by the fanatic robots who for three
hundred years attempted to “show feathered natives how to
live as we say you should” or be eliminated as “pagans.”

At Teotihuacan they left no glyphs, no perishable language, no

documents. They used “virgin speak” – Zuhuy Wak –
nonverbal symbolic methodology, identified by Schwaller de
Lubicz at Karnak, Egypt, where he found similar displays.

Some moderns have described Mayans as “just one more

Mesoamerican culture.”

We must declare that they have earned the right to be

acknowledged as a true civilization.

Hugh Harleston, Jr.

Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
(reedited April/2006)

pp.15
 FIG.5: INTERVALS OF 400 SATURNS RELATED TO TEOTIHUACAN

LONG DATE SUN IN: DAYS SATURN JÚPITER + DAYS

COUNT (ZODIAC) ¾ ZERO (ORBITS) (ORBITS)
(KATUNES) [NOTE]
0.0.0.0.0 Sept. 13, Kutz Zero Zero Zero Zero
4 Ahau -3,114 B.C.
8 Kumku (Zero) (Scorpio) [N-10]
1.1.0.0.0 Sept. 2, Moan 151,200 400 378 378
1 Ahau, - 2,700 B.C.
13 Dzootz (Libra) (21) [N-1]
2.2.0.0.0 Aug. 23, Moan 302,400 800 756 756
11 Ahau, -2,286 B.C.
3 Chen (Libra) (42) [N-2]
3.3.0.0.0 Aug. 12, Keh 453,600 1,200 1,134 1,134
8 Ahau, -1,872 B.C.
13 Mac (Virgo) (63)
4.4.0.0.0 Aug. 2, Keh 604,800 1,600 1,512 1,512
5 Ahau, -1,458 B.C.
3 Kumku (Virgo) (84)
5.5.0.0.0 Jul. 22, Dzec 756,000 2,000 1,890 1,890
2 Ahau, -1,044 B.C.
8 Dzootz (Leo/Virgo) (105) [N-2*]
6.6.0.0.0 Jul. 12, Dzootz 907,200 2,400 2,268 2,268
12 Ahau, - 630 B.C.
18 Mol (Cáncer) (126) [N-3]
7.7.0.0.0 Jul. 1, Dzootz 1,058,400 2,800 2,646 2,646
9 Ahau, - 216 A.c.
8 Mac (Cáncer) (147) [N-4]
8.8.0.0.0 Jun. 21, Aak 1,209,600 3,200 3,024 3,024
6 Ahau, 199 A.D.
18 Kayab (Gémini) (168) [N-5]
9.9.0.0.0 Jun. 11, Aak 1,360,800 3,600 3,402 3,402
3 Ahau, 613 A.D.
3 Dzootz (Gémini) (189) [N-6]
10.10.0.0.0 Jun. 1, Tzub 1,512,000 4,000 3,780 3,780
13 Ahau, 1,027 A.D.
13 Mol (Taurus) (210) [N-7]
11.11.0.0.0 May 21, Kan 1,663,200 4,400 4,158 4,158
10 Ahau, 1,441 A.D.
3 Mac (Aries/Tauro) (231)
12.12.0.0.0 May 11, Kan 1,814,400 4,800 4,536 4,536
7 Ahau, 1,855 A.D. (252)
13 Kayab (Aries/Tauro) [N-9] [N-8]

[N-_are Notes. See pp.17 & 18]

[Columns 1,2,3 per computer program Maya 2, © - HMCalderon – 1995, by permission.]
DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A.DOC/HH/ 06-V-04 P.16 ©– Hugh Harleston Jr – 2002
 INTERVALS OF 400 SATURNS
[Observations and Notes to Fig. 5]

1.) The HMC Chronological Constant (Hector M. Calderon, Mexico) is: 584,314 days
after zero on the Julian calendar (Nov.24, - 4,712 B.C.) The “MGT Constant,”
borrowed by Eric Thompson from Martinez & Goodman, is 584,283 days (see p. 18.)

2.) Ending of the present Oxlahkatun is Eight Katuns after the last of 400 Saturns:
May 11, 1855. Special ceremonies may have been carried out on the day of ze-
nital crossing near Latitude 17°-North. Theoretic locations include: Naranjo
(Belice;) Lago Peten, Yachilan, and Piedras Negras, Guatemala; Ocosingo and
Tonina, Chiapas; Mitla and Monte Alban, Oaxaca; and Juxtlahuaca, Guerrero.
Mayans may have kept secret the real reason for their festivals, but not the
magnitude of the event. Historians are invited to verify this theory.

3.) NOTES (numbered on Tabulation, Fig.5):

N-1: 1,512 = 4 x 378 = perimeter of the “Citadel,” = four orbits of Saturn = two double
circles, earpieces of Halach (wise men that know truth.) Multiplied by one hundred
equals 151,200 days, also equal to 21 Katuns. All counts of corresponding Jupiter or-
bits as well as extra days added to correct each count are functions of 378, the syn-
odic orbit of Saturn, integral multiples of 6 x 7 x 9.

N-2: 756 = two orbits of Saturn, the distance in STU (Standard Teotihuacan Units
of 1.0594(6) meters) from the Great Pyramid to the No.2 Pyramid (see Figs. 2, 3, 7 & 8.)
On this date Mercury was at inferior conjunction, crossing the sun.

N-2*: New moon; Mars and Mercury at Superior Conjunction.

N-3: 2,268 STU = north/south dimension of the “Ceremonial Zone” = 6 Saturn orbits =
six “Citadels” = Nineveh Constant (Question: is Nineveh from the same source?)

N-4: Jupiter at Superior Conjunction, behind the sun.

N-5: Mercury at Inferior Conjunction, crossing the sun.

N-6: Full moon. 13,608 = number of Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions of 7,182 days “con-
tained” in the volume of the magna design, a “numerical ark”: 756 STU by 2268 long
by 57 STU high. In addition, 13,608 = 63 X 216 , also 9 X 1,512, and further it is
3 x 4,536 (see N-8.) 3,600 = area of the base, Pyramid No.3 (“Citadel”), measur-
ing 60 STU by 60 STU. Multiplied by one hundred, 13,608 = 1,360,800 days = 189
Katunes (half of 378) to reach 3,600 Saturns, or Long Count: 9. 9. 0. 0. 0, corresponding
to June 11th, 613 A.D. (HMC Constant,) registered on stelae at Copan and Palenque.

(reedited 16-April-2006)

DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A/HH/06-V-04 P.17 © – Hugh Harleston Jr – 2006

 INTERVALS OF 400 SATURNS [Observations and Notes, continued]

There may not have been ceremonies at Teotihuacan, due to lack of food during
prolonged droughts peaking between 500 and 900 A.D. The abandonment of
Teotihuacan is believed by some to be possibly 550 A.D. (Hoffman/2000.) Others
theorize that there was no external invasion, only internal problems and that survivors
continued on the outskirts of the Pyramidal Zone until late in the 8th century.

N-7: Registered at Edzna (1,027 A.D.) when the alternate “short count” was
renewed (the KahlayKatunob of 13 Katunes = 93,600 days. (93,600 x 20 =1,872,000 = one
Oxlahkatun.) 936 STU is marked twice in the “Ceremonial Zone” = 1,872 STU.

N-8: 4,536 is also the number of triple Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions (21,600 less 54 =
21,546 days,*) that “fit” in the magna volume 97,732,656. Furthermore, 4,536 times
10 = 45,360, area of planet Earth in square STU, scaled at 100,000 to one, also equal
to 30 x 1,512, perimeter of the “Citadel” (or “Great Quadrangle of Saturn”.)

N-9: The lag times, in days, of Jupiter “behind” Saturn are the same as the number of
Katuns for multiples of 151,200 days. The series is: 21, 42, 63, …378. Jupiter’s orbit is
21 X 19 = 399. All Long Counts here are multiples of 1,512 (4 x 6 x 7 x 9.) One side
of the “Citadel” is the same number used to count:
(a) Circumference of a universal circle with radius “60,” pi = 3.15: 378
(b) Area of each of 120 triangles forming a sphere of circumference: 378
(c) Circumference of the earth, to scale 100,000 to 1: 378
(d) Saturn’s orbit in days: 378
(e) Number of synodic orbits of Jupiter in 21 Katunes: 378
(f) Number of additional days to correct Jupiter over 21 Katunes: 378
(g) Number of triple trips [N-10] of Jupiter in ten magna Arks: 378
(h) Area of each of 20 triangles that form a spherical model
of the earth, scaled at 100,000 : 1 = 2,268 = (6) x 378
these are Multidimensional Mayan Mathematical concepts

N-10: For Jupiter to pass through the circle of the Zodiac requires 2,160 orbits of 399 =
861,840 days = 2,280 X 378 = 57 X 10 X 1,512, factors of the magna “Ark.” Ten
“Arks” enclose 1,134 circlings of the Zodiac by Jupiter: 3 X 378.
so that 977,326,560 divided by (3 x 861,840)] = 378
All Long Counts computer calculated with Program Maya 2, © – H.M.Calderon-1995.
All counts match Mayan solar positions in the Zodiac. All dates given by the MGT
“Constant” are in error by one Zodiac Constellation (28-day count) plus 3 days.

[*Triple Jupiter/Saturn conjunction corrections identified by Harleston in 1989 on

pp.71-73 of the Dresden Codex.]

(reedited August 09, 2006 under MAYTRESU-05T2ED)

orig.DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A/HH/06-V-04 P.18 © – Hugh Harleston Jr - 2006

MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 1] HARLESTON
CONCLUSIONS
MAYAN DIMENSIONS AND MEASURES AT TEOTIHUACAN
1,) Mayan chronological counts are directly obtained when metric
dimensions are divided by 1.0594(6) m., the STU.
2.) The same counts are encoded as geometrical figures:
circles, triangles, squares, rectangles, ellipses (see Fig.11.)
3.) Values are redundant. Significant counts and their factors repeat
at widely separated areas (N/S = 2,403 m.; E/W = 801 m.)
4.) A universal message is a cube with sides of “6” whose volume and
area are the same number: “216,” which repeats in dimensions.
5.) A second universal: a tetrahedron of height 12 whose volume
and area are 216 times the square root of 3.
6.) A third message: a universal circle of radius 60 units with circum-
ference of 378: 6 times 7 times 9. (Pi = 63/20.)
7.) Identical dimensional numbers appear in Egypt, China, India,
England and Bolivia if measured in STU’s. The “Life of Brahma”
-- India = 144 x 2,160 = 311,040 = 360 x 864 (Mayan factors.)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEODESY
8.) Mayans calculated and marked kilometric distances great circle.
9.) A double circle and cross encodes: 13 Katuns = 93,600 days.
10) Four circles and cross encodes: 21 Katuns = 151,200 days.
11) Circles and cross marked points from which to observe and register
Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions, and/or other marked points (Venus
at maximum elongation-47°) up to 50 kilometers (47,000 STU.)

ASTRONOMICAL CORRELATIONS
12) Mayans made telescopes from parabolic and spherical mirrors in a
darkroom (camara oscura.) They could have seen (a) moons of Ju-
piter, (b) rings of Saturn and (c) three rings around the M31 galaxy.
13) Mayan constellation symbols appear in Teotihuacan as glyphs
and pictographs from Paris Codex (see Figs.7 & 10, below.)
14) Synodic orbital times of Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn
and the moon were registered accurately.

(reedited under MAYTRESU-05T2ED, 09-August-2006)

DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A/HH/06-V - 04 P.19

MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 1 - contd] HARLESTON

15) 21 Katuns = 151,200 days, that mark 400 Saturns of 378 days and
378 Jupiters of 399 days, with a correction of 378 days (see Fig.5.)
16) The series of Katuns follows the same numbers as lag times of
Jupiter behind Saturn in days: 21, 42, 63…, 189 (see Fig.5.)

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
17) The anniversary date of 3,600 Saturns after the initial Long Count at
3,114 B.C. was 9.9.0.0.0 = 1,360,800 days, registered at Copan and
Palenque.* It may have been celebrated at Teotihuacan. The anniver-
sary of 4,000 Saturns -- 10.10.0.0.0,-- or 1,512,000 days, was regis-
tered at Edzna in 1,027 A.D. to reinstate the 13-Katun count of
93,600 days.) The 57-STU "Ark"volume “contains" 13,608 Jupiter/
Saturn conjunctions, Edzna's day-count divided by one hundred.
Mayans knew multiples of ten (100, 1000, one million.)
18) Teotihuacan may be a Mayan chronological map of the solar system.
The magna design Numerical Ark of height 57 is a volume that en-
encloses: integral orbits of Jupiter, orbits of Saturn and Jupiter/Sa-
turn conjunctions. It also “contains” the lunar orbit, plus triple
Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions (every 21,546 days.) Corrections for the
latter were identified on pp. 71-73 of the Dresden Codex in 1989.
The pictographs of two stars “flying” with double “ribbons” can mean
Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions, not “ring numbers.” A series of thirteen
54’s defines Teotihuacan dimensions (see p21)
19) An additional design correlation: an “ark” 756x2268x63, height of
the Great Pyramid without a building on the summit, is a volume of
108,020,304 cubic STU, equal to two cubic Saturn Quadrangles.
The two (or one cube seen in a mirror) form six-sided boxes whose
perimeters are 9072 STU x 2 = 18,144: the 12th anniversary of the
400-Saturn day-count, divided by one hundred.
[*Note: Many STU dimensions are found at Palenque, including the
level of the entombed personage, which lies at 1.06 meters (one STU)
above the floor, marking the distance to the Temple entrance floor
a distance of 21 STU, the Jupiter lag-number. This was verified by
architect Marcela Paula Cea in 2002. See bibliography.]

(reedited under MAYTRESU-05T2ED –09-August-2006.)

DISK:MAYTRE-04T2A.DOCHH/06-V-04 P.20
MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 1] HARLESTON
20) Mayans inherited information from more ancient sources, but did
not deform the data as in other cases. Official dating is 8,000 to
9,000 B.C. (Hammond, 1986.) Similar information can be found
around the globe when differing measures are equalized by the
Standard Teotihuacan Unit, 1.0594(6) m.

21) “T’ol-Ti-Wak-K’an” can mean “Here, Conscious, in the Place of

Sixth-Dimensional Wisdom.” Teotihuacan is a Mayan bridge be-
yond time leading to better understanding of multidimensionals.

It is the finest example in the Americas of sacred landscape. “Sa-

cred” means “to consecrate religiously,” reconnect with our ori-
gin, become aware of objective reality, objective truth, objective
consciousness: the mathematical relationships of the cosmos.

22) Multidimensional states of attention can free “time” from its

Einsteinian chains. Epigraphers will still have a hard job when
it is realized that Mayan glyphs also enclose a series of “nu-
merical arks,” hidden cosmic counts encoded as circles, circular
arcs, rectangles, squares, triangles and ellipses. Additional mathe-
matical research may clarify multidimensional enigmas.

[Note: publication of information under Conclusion (19) was presented

in lectures, and registered in “Memoria” deposited at Universidad
Mesoamericana, San Luis Potosi (May 19, 2000), at Oaxaca (May 21,
2001), & Universidad de Baja California, Tijuana (October 19, 2001.)]

Hugh Harleston Jr, TIJUANA, B.C., MEXICO

22/December/2001
12.19.8.13.11 - 11 Chuen, 9 Keh

(reedited under MAYTRESU-05T2ED – 09-August – 2006)

P.21
MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 2] HARLESTON

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
[Special Note: Papers marked “[LC] were deposited at the time of issue in the Library of Congress,
Washington, D.C. and the Fondren Library, Rice University, Houston, Texas. In each case 100
copies were printed and also distributed to professionals in the fields of Archaeology and Ethnology,
plus to selected technically prepared individuals and some thirty libraries in U.S.A. and Mexico.]

BAKER III, George T.

1974 & Hugh Harleston Jr, Alfonso Rangel, Matthew Wallrath, Manuel Gaitan and
Alfonso Morales. “The Subterranean System of the Sun Pyramid of
Teotihuacan: A Physical Description and Hypothetical Reconstruction.”
XLI International Congress of Americanists and Uac-Kan (Private), 37 pp.,
7 drawings, 2 tables, detailed map 1:100 of secret cave, Mexico, D.F. [LC]

BARRERA Vazquez, Alfredo, y Silvia Rendon.

1972 El Libro de los Libros de Chilam-Balam, Fondo de Cultura
Economica, Mexico, D.F.

CALDERON, Hector M. [106 technical papers, partial list: Append.4]

1966 La Ciencia Matematica de los Mayas, Ed.Orion, Mexico, D.F.
1982 (584,314)-Correlacion de la Rueda de Katunes, La Cuenta Larga
y las Fechas Cristianas, Grupo Dzibil, Mexico, D.F.
1984 “Possibility that the Maya May Have Recorded a Progressive
Acceleration of Mercury.” (Symposium) Archaeoastronomy
and Ethnoastronomy in Mesoamerica, UNAM, Mexico D.F.
& Hugh Harleston, Jr. Clarifying the Mayan Zodiac.
(A Research Summary) MSS prepared for the American
Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, Mexico, D.F.
1989 (Sequences of the Mayan Zodiac, data for reconstruction of the
drawing by Harleston in “El Zodiaco Maya.” (see Harleston.)

CEA, Marcela Paula Gnzl, personal comm, recent (2001) INAH measure-
ments of Palenque's tomb evidence STU dimensions (cf.p.20.)

CODEX DRESDEN
1880 (Spanish Edition, Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico, 1988.)

CODEX PERESIANUS (PARIS CODEX found by Peres)

1887 (Paris, Leon de Rosny.)
1968 Also SAUER, Francisco, Joseph Stummvoll & Rodolfo Fiedler,
Bibliotheque Nationale Paris, Einleitung und Summary (in English)
F.Anders, Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt, Graz, Austria.

CORDAN, Wolfgang – Glifos Mayas, Sistema Mérida: cf. insert p.25

DISK:MAYTRE-04T2A/HH/06-V-04 P.22
MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 2] HARLESTON
ESCALONA Ramos, Alberto
1940 Cronologia y Astronomia Maya-Mexica. Editora de Revistas,
S.A., Editorial Fides, Mexico, D.F. (Mayan sky counts)

GAITAN Meza, Manuel, & Alfonso Morales, Hugh Harleston, Jr. &
1974 G.T.Baker, III., “La Triple Cruz Astronomica de Teotihuacan.”
XLI Congreso Int’l. de Americanistas; also Uac-Kan (private) at
Mexico, D.F., 37 pp., 16 dwgs., maps & tables. [LC]

GATES, William
1978 An Outline Dictionary of Maya Glyphs, Dover Publ., Inc., N.Y.

HALL, Robert L.
Some Implications of the Astronomical Associations of the La Mojarra
Stela 1 and Tuxtla Statuette Long Count Dates. (MSS for 3rd Int’l. Con-
ference on Archaeoastronomy, Univ. of St.Andrews, Scotland, publ. in
Spanish language Revista de la Univ.Veracruzana, La Palabra y el Hom-
bre, Oct.-Dic., Xalapa, Mexico, 1991, pp.9-18 & Personal Communication.

HARLESTON, Jr., Hugh

1974 “A Mathematical Analysis of Teotihuacan.” XLI Intl. Congress
of Americanists, & Uac-Kan (Private,) Mexico City, 36 pp. [LC]
1976 “The Teotihuacan Marker System: Solar Observations and
Geodesic Measurement.” XLII Intl. Congress of Americanists,
Paris, France & Uac-Kan (Private,) Mexico, D.F., 10 pp. [LC]
1976 & Manuel Gaitan, Alfonso Morales, Matthew Wallrath, Octavio
Flores and Eleazar Garcia. “A Probable Geodesic Grid System
of Stone Markers in the Valley of Tepoztlan.” XLII Int’l. Con-
gress of Americanists, Paris, France & Uac-Kan (Private) 10 pp.
17 dwgs., maps & tables, Mexico, D.F. [LC]
1981 Did Teotihuacan’s Designers, or their Predecessors, Have a
Knowledge of Spherical Trigonometry? (A Research Summary:
1972-1981.) Uac-Kan (Private) Mexico, D.F., 35 pp., dwgs. [LC]
1984 “Prediction by Precalculation of Archaeological Sites and En-
graved Stones Based on Teotihuacan Dimensional Modules Pro-
jected on Great Circle Arcs”(A Research Summary: 1972-1984)
National Photogrammetry Society / American Ass’n of Survey-
ing and Mapping, San Antonio, TX, and Proceedings of NPS/
AASM Convention, Maryland, 1985, 28 pp., dwgs., maps. [LC]
1984 The Keystone: A Search for Understanding. Character Composition,
Bellaire, Tx, 136 pp., 38 dwgs., 6 tabulations. [LCCN 88-117575]
DISK:MAYTRE-04T2A/HH/06-V-04 P.23
MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 2] HARLESTON

1987 El Universo de Teotihuacan. Ed.Orion, Mexico, D.F.

1991 El Zodiaco Maya, Ed.Diana, Mexico, D.F.
1996 Thirteen “Heavens” or Mayan Time Counts? 12 pp. (MSS)
2000 Dynamics of the Golden Mean. (Private), Tijuana, Mexico [LC]
2001 Una Enciclopedia Maya (Espacio y Tiempo Unificados en Teoti-
huacan) 3 Conferencias: Universidad Mesoamericana (San Luis
Potosi – May/2000 y Oacaca – May/2001;) Univ. de Baja California
(Tijuana – Oct./2001,) Mexico. (See Note, Conclusions, p.21.)

LANGENBERG, D.N. & B.N.Taylor.

1971 Precision Measurements and Fundamental Constants.
National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.

MARTINEZ Paredez, Domingo

1964 Hunab Ku: Sintesis del Pensamiento Filosofico Maya.
Ed.Orion, Mexico, D.F. and personal communications.

MEDINA Peralta, Manuel

1974 Elementos de Astronomia de Posicion. Ed.Limusa, Mexico.

MEDIZ Bolio, Antonio

1941 (reprint ’79) Libro de Chilam Balam de Chumayel. UNAM,
Mexico, (pp.113)

MILLON, Rene, Bruce Drewitt & George L. Cowgill

1973 The Teotihuacan Map, Vol.1, Parts 1 & 2, Univ.of Texas Press.

MORLEY, Sylvanus G.
1915 An Introduction to the Study of Maya Hieroglyphs, Bulletin 57,
Smithsonian Inst. (reprint: 1975, Dover Publ. Inc, New York.)

OUSPENSKY, P.D.
1960 In Search of the Miraculous. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.,
London, England.

RECINOS, Adrian
1972 Popol Vuh – Las Antiguas Historias del Quiche. Fondo de
Cultura Economica, Mexico, D.F.

SCHLEMMER, Alfred E.
1971 “Some Special Aspects of Technological Forecasting.”
Primer Simposio de Pronosticos Tecnologicos, XI Convencion Nacio-
nal del Instituto de Ingenieros Quimicos, Mexico, D.F.
DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A/HH/06-V-04 P.24
MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 2] HARLESTON

SCHWALLER de LUBICZ, R.A.

1949 Symbol and the Symbolic. Autumn Press, Brookline, Mass. USA

SEVERIN, Gregory M.
1981 “’The Paris Codex’- Decoding an Astronomical Ephemeris.” Transac-
tions of the American Philosophical Society, Vol.71, Part 5, Philadelphia.

THOMPSON, J. Eric S.
1950 Maya Hieroglyphic Writing, Carnegie Institution, Washington,
D.C. (reprint Univ.of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 3rd Ed., 1971.)
1988 “Un Comentario al Codice de Dresde”(310 pp.) Fondo de Cultu-
ra Economica, Mexico, D.F. (1st publ. “A Maya Hieroglyphic
Book,” American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, 1972.)

TOMPKINS, Peter, & Hugh Harleston, Jr.

1976 Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids. Harper & Row, New York
and later publications (England & Mexico in Spanish,) with
Analysis and 55 original drawings by Hugh Harleston Jr.

THEON OF SMYRNA
200 Mathematics Useful for Understanding Plato. Wizards Book-
A.D. shelf, San Diego, CA, 1979.

VILLACORTA, J.Antonio et al.

1930 Codices Mayas (Codice Tro-Cortesiano/Madrid.) Sociedad de
Geografia e Historia de Guatemala, Guatemala City.

ZUKAV, Gary
1980 The Dancing Wu Li Masters (An Overview of the New Physics,)
Bantam Books, Inc., New York.

CORDAN, Wolfgang. Introducción a los Glifos Mayas (sistema Mérida)

1969 (Posthumus), edit. R.Kolb, El Manual Moderno, Mexico, D.F.

[NOTE: The 75 references in Appendix 2 represent one-fifth of the archaeo-

logical bibliography used in the preparation of this Summary.]

DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A/HH/06-V-04 P.25

MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 2, CONT.] HARLESTON
SUPPLEMENTAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

Partial List of Technical Papers by H.M.Calderon, Mexico, D.F.

1.) No.21. “La Formula Lunar de los Mayas,” 4 pp.

2.) No.26. “El Altar 1 de Naranjo,” 10 pp., 2 drawings.
3.) No.31. “Placa del Altar 1 de Naranjo,” 6 pp.
4.) No.32. “La Formula Lunar de Naranjo,” 3 pp.
5.) No.46. “Los Mayas No Inventaron el Cero,” 2 pp.
6.) No.53. “Por Una Luna,” 7 pp.
7.) No.54. “La Tabla de Mercurio,” 9 pp., 2 drawings.
8.) No.55. “El Calendario Venusino y Joviano del Pos-Clasico Maya,” 5 pp.
9.) No.59. “Tabla de Venus,” 6 pp., 6 drawings.
10) No.61. “Significado de T-1042 (de Thompson,) 4 pp.
11) No.63. “Nuestro Absurdo Calendario Cristiano,” 9 pp.
12) No.64. “Texto de la Lapida de Palenque,” 27 pp., bibliography.
13) No.65. “Fechas de la Cruz de Palenque,” 32 pp., 1 drawing (30/I/’84)
14) No.66. “Las Fechas ‘Cascabel,’” 17 pp., bibliography (19/II/´84)
15) No.69. “Mayas y Toltecas,” 10 pp.
16) No.72. “Jupiter y Saturno,” 8 pp.
17) No.74. “Glifo del Cacao,” 3 pp.
18) No.85. “Glifo y Nombre Maya de Mercurio,” 10 pp. (26/V/’89)
19) No.88. “Las Fechas de Cacaxtla,” 10 pp.
20) No.90. “Localizacion de las Constelaciones del Zodiaco Maya,” 3 pp.
21) No.92. “Estrellas en los Codices Mayas,” 6 pp.
22) No.103 “La Tabla Zodiacal del Codice Peresiano,” 6 pp. (3/II/’88)
23) No.106 “Fecha de la Probable Colisión de Mercurio con el Sol Según
Códice de Dresde,” 5 pp. (14/X/’84)
24) ----- “Como Hacian los Mayas la Correccion a la Tabla de Eclipses,”
1 pagina, (12/XI/’91)
25) ----- “Como Predecian los Mayas los Eclipses,” 5 pp., (26/V/’84)
26) ----- “La Prediccion Maya de los Eclipses,” 40 pp.
27) ----- “Tabla de Ek Yum,” 14 pp. (22/II/’85)
28) ----- “Resumen del Calculo del Periodo Sideral de Ek Yum,” 2 pp. (’85)
29) ----- “Los Codices Revelan Que los Mayas Descubrieron Otra Luna, Negra
e Invisible,” 2 pp. (20/I/’87)
30) ----- “La Tabla de Jupiter del Codice Dresde,” 7 pp. (01/IX/’90)

Copies of the above papers are in the personal library of the author of this
Research Summary. For copies or information regarding reproduction and
postage contact: Hugh Harleston, Jr. c/o P.O.Box 43-1192, San Diego, CA
92143, USA

DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A / HH / 06-V-04 P.26

A MAYAN TREASURE [APPENDIX 3] HARLESTON
CONVERSION OF MEASUREMENTS: ONE STU=1.0594(6) METERS
(Roundings are less than official map accuracy of +/- 50 cms.)

Distance Meters (Source) Equivalent STU Rounded STU

Citadel, C. to Cen.
West platforms 171+/-0.5 (2) 161.4 +/- 0.4 162 = 3x6x9

Citadel, C. to Cen. 153 +/- 0.5 (2) 144.4 +/- 0.4 144 = 3x6x8
South platforms
400 +/- 0.5 (1) 377.6 +/- 0.4 378 = 6x7x9
Citadel: N&S wall

Citadel: West wall 400.5 +/- 0.5 (2) 378.1 +/- 0.4 378 = 6x7x9

“Moon” Pyr. to SE 200 +/- 0.5 (1) 188.8 +/- 0.4 189 = 3x7x9

Cit. Upper Patio 247.9 +/- 0.5 (2) 233.9 +/- 0.4 234 = 2x9x13
N/S, face-to-face

Cit. W.platform 229. +/- 0.5 (2) 216.2 +/- 0.4 216 = 6x6x6
Stair to baseline
Quetz. Pyramid
12.8 +/- 0.1 (4) 12.08 +/- 0.1 12 = 2x2x3
Cit. Main Stair.
Quetz. Pyramid

Cit. Baseline of 63.5 +/- 0.5 (3) 59.9 +/- 0.4 60 = 3x4x5
Quetz. Pyramid

Cit. NW corner 31.6 +/- 0.5 (3) 29.8 +/- 0.4 30 = 2x3x5
Q-Pyr. to c/L main
Staircase
SOURCE: (1) Drewitt, Bruce. “Data Bearing on Urban Planning at Teotihuacan.”
American Anthropological Association Report, Toronto, Canada, 1972.
(2) Millon, Rene et al. The Teotihuacan Map, U.of Texas Press, Vol.1,
Parts 1&2, Austin, TX, 1973, Map pp. 76 (Note: map reconstructed from aerial
survey photographs, with errors of plus or minus 50 centimeters = 0.5 meters.)
(3) Marquina, Ignacio. Arquitectura Prehispanica. Memorias INAH,
Lamina 17: La Ciudadela, p.82, Mexico, D.F., 1951 (Topo Map P.Dosal, w/errors)
(4) Steel tape measurements, Harleston & A.Rangel, field notes, June/1980
DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A / HH / 10-V-04 (reedited MAYTRESU-05T2ED – 16/Apr./2006) 27
note: there is no page 28
 FIG. 12
(Extract:)HARLESTON, Jr., Hugh, Thirteen “Heavens” or Mayan Time Counts?
MSS (Abridged), Tijuana, B.C., Mexico, 21/March/1999 (Orig: 9/March/1996)
“…the count of Heaven is 13 Katuns…to ascend use 9’s”
ANALYSIS: JUPITER AND MARS COUNTS PER KATUN OF 7,200 DAYS
(19 SOLAR YEARS PLUS ONE TZOLKIN OF 260 DAYS)
____________________________________________________________________
KATUN TOTAL J U P I T E R M A R S
NUMBER DAYS No. Orbits +(days) No. Orbits +(days)

13 93,600 234 = 9x26 234 117 = 13x9 9x260

12 86,400 216 = 9x24 216 108 = 12x9 9x240

11 79,200 198 = 9x22 198 99 = 11x9 9x220

10 72,000 180 = 9x20 180 90 = 10x9 9x200

9 64,800 162 = 9x18 162 81 = 9x9 9x180

8 57,600 144 = 9x16 144 72 = 8x9 9x160

7 50,400 126 = 9x14 126 63 = 7x9 9x140

6 43,200 108 = 9x12 108 54 = 6x9 9x120

5 36,000 90 = 9x10 90 45 = 5x9 9x100

4 28,800 72 = 9x8 72 36 = 4x9 9x 80

3 21,600 54 = 9x6 54 27 = 3x9 9x 60

2 14,400 36 = 9x4 36 18 = 2x9 9x 40

1 7,200 18 = 9x2 18 9 = 1x9 9x 20

________________________________________________________________________
Note: Bold and underlined counts are principal dimensions of structures at Teotihuacan when
measured in Standard Teotihuacan Units (STU) of 1.0594(6) meters. [See Conclusions]
OBSERVATIONS
(1) Jupiter is the only planet with all orbital counts and all day-corrections being the
same numbers. All counts are functions of the number NINE (Mayan: Bolon.)
(1) Mars’ Mayan names were Chac-Ek (Red Star) and also Bolon-Tzacab = 9-Rattler.

.P.35 (c) – Hugh Harleston, Jr. - 2002

.DISK: MAYTRE-04T2A.DOC // HH // 09-VIII-06