Consumer Optimization
Consumer Optimization
Consumer Optimization
Table of Contents:
1. Introduction
2. Optimization
2.1case of well behaved preferences
2.1.1 Diagrammatic treatment
2.1.2 Algebraic expression
2.2 Interior solution and boundary optimums
2.2.1 Kinked preferences
2.2.2 Perfect substitutes
2.2.3Nuetrals and bads
2.2.4 Concave preferences
2.2.5 Cobb Douglas Preferences
3. Demand
3.1 Well behaved preferences
3.2 Perfect substitutes
3.3 perfect compliments
3.4 Giffen goods
4. Engel’s curve
4.1 Well behaved Indifference curve
4.2 inferior goods
4.3 perfect substitutes
4.4 Perfect compliments
4.5 Cobb Douglas Preferences
4.6 Homothetic Preferences
4.7 Quasi linear preferences
5. Summary
6. Exercises
7. Glossary
8. Appendix
9. References
Learning Outcomes:
After studying this chapter, a student should be able to:-
1. Introduction
Can you recall when you were given pocket money at the age of 7 or 8! You always knew
how to utilize that money. Either kids at that age would spend on cola, ice-cream, or
whatever toys one wanted. But I ‘m sure you must have chosen whatever must have
brought you joy and satisfaction. You didn’t know what optimization was, what
microeconomics technique to be applied and what conditions were to be met. But you were
genius who did optimization subconsciously and actually every consumer does.
In this chapter, we will deal with optimization formally. This chapter is divided into three
main sections. First section covers optimization’s conditions for various preferences. In
second section, demand curve of a good for a consumer is desired. In last section, impact
of change in income on optimal quantity of good is analyzed.
2. Optimization
Optimization in context of utility would mean maximizing utility given the budget set. Given
any level of income, M and prices & good x & y as p X & pY a consumer maximizes his utility
by choosing a consumption bundle that gives him highest satisfaction. This bundle choice is
dependent on consumer’s preferences. It is obvious to assume that consumer is happier
consuming good x (relatively to good y), then his optimal consumption bundle would have
more of good x. But, this consumer’s choice is also affected by price of good x in the
market and is constrained by his income. Hence, optimal choice is decided by nexus
between budget set and preferences.
curve is locus of all consumption bundles which yield some constant level of utility. Budget
set and indifference map have same x-axis and y – axis labeling as x-good and y-good,
respectively. Lt us super impose indifference curves on budget set, like in
Figure1
A Few affordable bundles given some income, ‘M’ are marked in above figure. Point A,B and
C yield utility U0 and likewise points F,G, H yield utility U1 & point E yield U21.
Amongst all such affordable bundles, the point that maximized utility is point E that gives
utility U2. There are two remarkable things that point ‘E’:-
= MRSxy=
1
Assumed here that U2>U1>U 0and ‘0’,’1’&’2’ subscripts create correspondence between indifference curve with
their respective utility level.
Slope of budget line measures that rate at which market is willing to substitute good y for
good x. The above equation implies that rate of substitution in a market should be equal to
marginal rate of substitution of two good by a consumer.
Max : U(x,y)
- λ Px =0 …..1
- λ Py=0 ….. 2
-(px x +py-M)=0 …… 3
2
optional
3
λ is lagrange multiplier and here it becomes ratio of befits to cost. Additional benefit from each good is
MU and cost is its price. So, condition implies that marginal benefit to cost ratio must be equal for all
goods.
Gossen's laws, named for Hermann Heinrich Gossen (1810 – 1858), are three
laws of economics:
Gossen's First Law is the “law” of diminishing marginal utility: that marginal
utilities are diminishing across the ranges relevant to decision-making.
Gossen's Second Law, which presumes that utility is at least weakly quantified,
is that in equilibrium an agent will allocate expenditures so that the ratio of
marginal utility to price (marginal cost of acquisition) is equal across
all goods and services.
where
is utility
is quantity of the -th good or service
is the price of the -th good or service
Where, U’x is marginal utility of x and U’y is marginal utility of y. It is same equilibrium
condition required for optimal choice bundle, which was attained in last section. Equation 3
implies that this choice bundle (x,y) must end up entire income.
act as solution to optimization problem. But technique of calculus is of no use in such cases.
We will analyze them in this section.
Figure 2
When two goods are perfect complements, then indifference curves are L shaped.
Indifference curve for perfect complements also have kink.
Figure 3
Optimal bundle for perfect complements indifference curve is where kink touches the budget
line like at point E in figure 3 .Since at kink slope cannot be calculated so there has to be
alternate method to complete optimal bundle.
Consider a consumer’s preferences that ‘a’ units of x are consumed with ‘b’ units of y .The
indifference curves would appear as in figure 4.The kinks would be on line OA whose slope
is b/a .Origin is also one point and one indifference curve is an L at origin (that is x axis
and y axis itself is an indifference curve).
Figure 4
Optimal point is hence at intersection of line OA and budget line. Budget line is given by
pxx+py y=M and line OA’s equation is y=(b/a) x. Solving these two equations yield :
figure 5
Figure 6
This would mean that consumer is willing to substitute y for good x at greater pace .This
mean consumers values good x more than good y. since two goods can be substituted
easily (perfectly) and optimal choice would be at point E1 in panel (1) of figure 6;where
consumer consumes all x and zero units of good y.( ,0) is boundary optimum.
This case is just reverse of above discussed case. It is depicted in panel (2) of figure 6 and
in such case consumer consumes all y and nothing of good x. (0, ) is boundary optimum.
In such a case, one indifference curve overlap budget line and hence all points starting from
(0, ) and in between and including ( ,0) are optimal.
Let us write down demand function of x when goods x and y perfect substitutes as follows:
{
when >
0 when <
X=
Figure 7
Now let good y be bad and good x as good. Then consumer has highest utility when bad y is
not consumed. This is depicted in figure 8.
Figure 8
In both the cases, boundary optimum is achieved, where all income is spent on good and
nothing on bad or neutral commodity.
Figure9
xcyd)=c xc-1yd
(xcyd)=d xc yd-1
MRSxy=
Px x* + Py x* =M
( )Px x* =M
x* = ( )
y*=
In case of Cobb Douglas preferences, share of income (M) spent on good x (P xx) is equal to
the ( ). Hence, fraction of income spent on either good is fixed. The size of this fraction is
determined by the exponent (of quantity of that good) in Cobb Douglas function. In two
goods case, hence, it is better to assume that c+d=1. This assumption makes it clear that
income is spent on these goods with some weights given by respective exponents of units of
goods in utility function.
3. Demand
Demand function shows the relationship between price and quantity demanded. For a
normal good, there exists negative relationship between and price and quantity demanded.
In this section, we will analyze and derive demand curve in case of consumer’s different
preferences.
In panel (i) of Figure 10, when price of good x falls from P 1 to P2 and then to P3 (while
holding price of y constant), budget line shifts from GH to GH1 to GH2. The optimal bundles
are marked E0, E1 and E2, respectively. With the fall in price of good x consumer has
enlarged budget set and hence, more of good x can be consumed.4 The quantity demanded
rises from x1 to x2 to x3 which corresponds to prices P1, P2 and P3, respectively. Connecting
all the optimal bundles lead to construction of price offer curve. This curve shows bundles
that would be demanded at different prices of good x. In panel (ii) of figure 10, we trace
down quantities and plot these quantities against their respective prices. We get demand
curve which is downward sloping i.e.
The price and quantity demanded of that good move in opposite direction cetirus peribus (Py, M and
consumer’s preferences are held constant).
which means slope of indifference curve is greater than slope of budget line and hence only
good x will be demanded. If price of good x rises above , only good y will be consumed
and zero quantity of good x is demanded. When price of good x is equal to any quantity
i. Budget Line
GH1, since
4
Fall in price leads to two effects. First, purchasing original bundle leaves consumer with some extra income at
hand and second, fall in price of x makes it cheaper and sometimes consumer consume more of it in place of good
y. This will be discussed in chapters to come.
all bundles on this budget line are optimal i.e. when price of good x is .
ii. X-axis when price of good x has fallen below , only good x is demanded.
Figure 11
Again plotting down the quantities against respective prices yield demand curve in panel (2)
of figure 11. Above , zero units of good x are demanded; at any quantity between zero
and M/p*x can be demanded & if price falls further more of (only) good x is demanded.
Figure 12
Price offer curve is the line joining all the kinks of indifference curves starting from origin.
For ‘a’ units of x with ‘b’ units of y example, we computed optimal bundle x*=
= .a =
Or <0 (since M is always positive and rest all terms are squared)
The demand curve then for giffen good is positively sloped. These type of goods are
exception to law of demand.
4 Engel curves
Engel curve shows the relationship between demand for a good and income of the
consumer. For a normal good, one can argue that there exists positive relationship between
the two. But there are goods whose demand falls when income of the consumer goes up.
Such goods are known as inferior goods.
income increases, the entire addition to income is used up to consume good x. So when
income is M1 then x1= and then income increased to M2; x2 = .
x1 and x2 are boundary optimum shown as bundles E0 and E1 in panel (i) of figure 16. Panel
(ii) of figure 16 depicts Engels curve. Slope of Engel ´s curve is calculated as follows:
= = =Px
Or >0
Figure 17 Figure 18
x* = .
Again, differentiating this equation with respect to Δx* and upon rearranging, we get:
Px =
Assuming c+d =1 the reason for which was explained earlier, = ; which is slope of
Engel’s curve.
Figure19
This would mean Income offer curve is a straight line joining (x 1,y1),(2x1,2y1) ,(3x1,3y1) and
so on. Where (x1,y1) is optimal bundle when income is M and (2x1,2y1) is when income
doubles is optimal and likewise.
on how much a consumer x and not on ratio (y/x).If consumer’s income is M1 and optimal
bundle is (x1,y1) and now if income increases his optimal bundle becomes (x1,y1+k) for any
constant k.
Figure 20
The example of such a good is salt. Even when income is added there is no increase in the
quantity of salt demanded. You spend addition to income on all goods but salt. Hence there
is ‘zero income effect’.
Summary
For solution to utility maximization problem, it requires that indifference curve is
tangent to budget line or equivalently slope of the two are equal. When indifference
curves have kink, the kinked point should touch budget line for optimal solution.
For a normal good, law of demand operates and quantity demanded moves in
opposite direction of –in response to- prince change. Demand curves are negatively
sloped in all cases but Giffen goods.
For a normal good, change in quantity demanded is positively related to the change
in income of the consumer and hence, Engel curve is positively sloped in all cases
but inferior goods.
Exercises
Q1. a) If a consumer has a utility function U(x,y)= x1y4, what fraction of his income will
he spend on good y?
b) If prices are Px and Py and income, M; what will be consumer’s optimal choice
bundle?
Q2. Suppose that a consumer always consumes 2 spoons of sugar with 1 cup of tea and
their respective prices are Ps and Pt and consumer has m rupees to spend on sugar and tea.
How much will he demand?
c) Solve for optimal choice bundle if prices are Px and Py and consumer’s income is M.
Q4. Henry is currently consuming only Coke and Pizza. At his current consumption bundle
marginal utility of Coke is 10 and that of Pizza is 5. Each Coke costs Rs.2 and each Pizza
costs Rs.10. Is he maximizing his utility? Explain. If he is not, how can he increase his utility
while keeping his expenditure constant?
Q5. Assume good x is inferior. Draw income offer curve. Is it possible, even good y is
inferior? Explain.
Q6. Madhu views Pepsi and Coca-cola as perfect substitutes. The price of 750 ml bottle of
Pepsi is Rs. 10 and price of 750 ml bottle of Coca-cola is Rs.12. what does Madhu’s Engel
curve for Pepsi look alike? By how much her Budget should increase so that she can
consume one more unit of Pepsi?
Glossary
Optimal choice: It is optimum when it is the best state of affairs and choice which
is optimum is called optimal choice.
Price offer curve: The locus of all consumer equilibria when price changes is known
as price offer curve.
Demand curve: Demand curve is curve showing the negative(for normal good)
relationship between price and quantity demanded by consumer.
Giffen good: In case consumer violates law of demand, and for a good positive
relationship between price and quantity demanded by consumer is observed then
that good is called giffen good.
Income offer curve: The locus of all consumer equilibria when income of consumer
changes is known as income offer curve.
Engel’s curve: Engel’s curve is curve showing the positive (for normal good)
relationship between income and quantity demanded by consumer.
Inferior good: : If for a good negative relationship between income and quantity
demanded by consumer is observed then that good is called inferior good.
References:
www.wikipedia.org