Proyecto Hippodamos 93
Proyecto Hippodamos 93
Proyecto Hippodamos 93
This paper is an adapted and updated version of the case study prepared for UN-Habitat’s
Global Report on Human Settlements 2009: Revisiting Urban Planning, Chapter 8. The
urban regeneration of Plaine Saint-Denis, Paris region, 1985–2020: Integrated planning in a
large ‘Urban Project’ (© UN-Habitat). It may not reflect the point of view of IAU île-de-France
as an institution.
Cover picture (Figure 1): The Plaine Saint Denis in 1999 with the newly A 1 covered
highway and the 1998 World Cup stadium in the background.
© Gobry - DREIF
The main reason for this success is probably that the regeneration of this 750 hectare
area was not made up of one single large flagship project. It was instead a pragmatic
process combining study, multi-level planning, area-based action and good use of
unexpected opportunities, but always with the idea of supporting a balanced
development of a wider area.
The local elected representatives believe now that the Plaine Saint-Denis area
should play its part in a sustainable metropolitan policy that they see as: Maintaining
industrial activities and low-income households in the heart of the Paris region, while
intensifying urban space to attract new people and businesses around a denser
network of transport and social infrastructure. The ‘city model’ this regeneration
process refers to is clearly that of an inclusive mix-use and pedestrian-oriented city.
But trying doing this at local level in the context of a large western metropolis of
around 11 million people is not an easy task. The results, after over 20 years of
combined local and regional efforts, reflect the unavoidable contradiction between
being one of the strategic development areas of a global metropolis and answering
the needs of local residents. Moreover, the social, economic and real estate
dynamics of Plaine Saint-Denis are so active that nothing can be said for sure: who
knows if the early pioneer residents and activities will still be there in a few years
time? The future is open, until 2020 and beyond.
1
To take a few European exemples Barcelona’s Forum-Besos project, Rotterdam Kop van Zuid,
Malmö Western Harbour, London Thames Gateway locations that have been studied recently by
IAURIF –see Cahiers de l’IAURIF, Vol.146, June 2007.
3
Figure 2. The Plaine Saint-Denis area in the regional context. Source: IAU îdf
Between 1840 and 1960, Plaine Saint-Denis had gradually become one of Europe’s
largest industrial zones, providing 50,000 jobs in 1940 on an area covering 750
hectares. Metalwork, chemistry, energy production and consumer goods
manufacturing were the main activities. At that time, the area had a strong working-
class identity, drawing workers from other regions of France, from Spain and Italy,
and later from North-Africa, some of them living in the Plaine, close to the factories.
In the 1970s, the whole area started to suffer from what became a deep economic
and social crisis: one after the other manufacturing companies either closed or
relocated elsewhere. In 1986 there were about 200 hectares of vacant land; the
number of jobs had fallen to 27,000 in 1990. Moreover, the industrial decline was
depriving the municipalities of one of their main financial resource: the local business
tax.
4
• Poor housing conditions and social deprivation, with a declining population,
low-income households, and an under-skilled workforce mostly of foreign
origin.
The 1980s and 1990s also saw the arrival of low added-value economic activities
(logistics, textile wholesalers, car-dealers, etc.) attracted by the relatively cheap
rents: They were at first regarded quite positively by local authorities, but soon
created new problems, such as road congestion and environmental degradation. And
no private developer or investor was interested in the Plaine area for new office or
housing programmes.
A glimpse of the institutional and political context helps to understand how the
regeneration process was conducted. The 750 hectares of Plaine Saint-Denis lies
mainly on the territory of three relatively small municipalities (communes): Saint-
Denis (about 90,000 inhabitants), Aubervilliers (63,000) and, for a small part, Saint-
Ouen (50,000), all being part of the Département (county) of Seine-Saint-Denis. At
the time, all three municipalities —which have important planning powers in the
French system— had left wing-led councils with communist mayors whose objectives
were to remain working-class cities and to keep their industry.
And unlike other large cities in France, the Paris region (11.6 million inhabitants,
12,000 km², 1,300 municipalities) has no metropolitan authority. The Ile-de-France
Regional Council has an overall spatial development responsibility, the City of Paris
(2.2 million inhabitants, 100 km²) has strong planning and development powers but
only within the narrow limits of its municipal boundaries. The real regional planning
powers lied then in the hands of the regional representative of Central Government.
It’s the story of integrated regeneration (see box 1 for key dates), where many
dimensions (social, economic, transport, housing, public space) are brought
holistically at different levels (long-term regional planning, 10-year city planning, and
area-based planning and development) using a range of ad hoc instruments (non-
regulatory plans, multi-level agreements and contracts, public developers, etc.)
Box 1
Key dates
1985 : Plaine Renaissance created
1990 : White Paper on Paris Region : Plaine Saint-Denis as a strategic area
1991 : Inter-municipal Development Charter and Plaine Saint-Denis Urban Project approved.
Plaine Développement created
1991-2004 : open forum « les Assises de la Plaine »
1992 : France chosen to host the Word Soccer Cup. Hippodamos 93 created
1993 : World Cup Stadium decision in Plaine Saint-Denis. Stade de France Agreements
1994 : Regional Structure Plan & Joint State-Region Investment Programme 1994-1998/99
5
1997 : Joint Urban Development Agreements. Stadium and related infrastructure completed
1998 : World Cup –French soccer team wins
2000 : Plaine Commune Inter-municipal authority. Joint Investment Programme 2000-2006
2002 : Plaine de France Joint Development Agency for a larger territory
2005 : OIC choses London to host the 2012 Olympics
2006 : approval of Plaine Commune Masterplan (Schéma de Coherence Territoriale)
2007 : Joint State-Region Investment Programme 2007-2013 approved
2012 : delivery of metro M12 extension, and trams T3 and TY. Around 400 hectares of
industrial land regenerated
2020 : Plaine Saint-Denis, a major multi-functional centre in the Paris region?
Box 2
Plaine Renaissance
Created in 1985, Plaine Renaissance (Syndicat Mixte Plaine Renaissance) was the first
formal joint local initiative for the regeneration of the Plaine Saint-Denis industrial area.
Gathering first-hand knowledge and expertise on the assets and drawbacks of the Plaine,
Plaine Renaissance managed to convince public and private stakeholders to invest in a
social, environmental and economical project for the future of the area. The organisation
prepared the Inter-municipal Development Charter (1990-1991) and the Urban Project
process (1991-1998), and worked as a local development agency until the creation of Plaine
Commune in 1999.
On this basis, Plaine Renaissance organised the first planning and design
competition in 1990-1991. But instead of designating one single winner, the local
authorities asked the competitors to team up and create one single spatial design
organisation: Hippodamos 93 (see box 3) was to advise the authorities through the
urban regeneration process.
6
Box 3
Hippodamos 93
The urban designers of the 1991 consultation, architects Yves Lion, Pierre Riboulet, Bernard
Reichen, and landscape architect Michel Corajoud, got together to conduct the Urban Project
planning and design studies and created to this end the GIE Hippodamos 93 (‘Economic
Interest Group’). In 1992, they produced the Urban Project, a vision and a method for
regeneration. In 1993-1994, among other works, they studied the integration of the Stade de
France and related infrastructure into the Project framework. With the creation of the Urban
Planning Departement of Plaine Commune in the years 1999-2001, Hippodamos 93 ceased
its activity.
One of the fundamental ideas of the Project was to enhance the existing assets of
the Plaine and to create the conditions for change. Creating a grid of generous public
spaces almost from scratch was an answer to this. This system opened up the
industrial fabric and reconnected the Plaine to Paris and to the neighbouring cities:
East-West and North-South 28 metre-wide multi-functional avenues were proposed.
Along this new ‘green’ street system, with the change of image, denser new mixed-
use buildings and environments could be developed in time (figures 3a-b-c-d).
Functional-mix building, social mix, and urban diversity, were at the basis of the
Project. The idea was not to remove existing productive activities, but to create the
conditions for most of them to remain and evolve.
Strategic areas were designated, where strong public intervention was needed in the
short or medium-term to improve the environment2 : the main axis (Wilson avenue),
the gateways (Porte de Paris, Porte de la Chapelle, and Porte d’Aubervilliers), the
Canalside and the heart of the Plaine. Re-use of industrial buildings was seen as an
asset for future development.
The Urban Project fixed qualitative and quantitative objectives —the provision of
10,000 housing units by 2015 (in addition to the 4000 existing units), and the
provision of 23,000 new jobs (in addition to the 27,000 existing).
But the planning guidelines to reach these objectives left a lot of flexibility for
negotiations between different partners (local authorities, public developers, private
investors, users, local residents, etc.). The Project focused on the permanent and
fundamental elements of the city (public spaces, major landmarks) to create the
conditions for a sustainable transformation of a mono-functional area to a mixed-use
district.
2
Including: covering up the A1 highway, further education centre at the Plaine de la Plaine, and
improvement of the highway exchange at Porte de Paris.
7
Figure 3a.
The Urban Project
1998 version with Stadium and Canal Park.
Credits : Hippodamos 93.
Figure 3b. Artist view of a future east-west axis in the 1992 Urban Project. Credit : Hippodamos 93
Figures 3c-d. The east-west avenue in the Landy-Pleyel development area after demolition of gaz
works (right in 1998) and today (left in 2008). Credits : Paul Lecroart - IAU îdf
8
A regional strategic development area
As early as 1990, the Central Government Regional Administration (DREIF), the
Urban Planning and Development Agency of the Paris Region (IAURIF) and the Paris
Urban Agency (APUR) had published a regional White Paper in which the Plaine
Saint-Denis area was identified as a “strategic sector” for the Paris Ile-de-France
region. (fig. 4)
The ideas contained in the Urban Project attracted strong interest from central
government and the Regional Council —who could not intervene directly in the area
without local support (see box 4)— as the Project converged with their own positions.
Box 4
Early regeneration partners
• Cities of Saint-Denis and Aubervilliers: initiators of regeneration in the Plaine Saint-Denis,
in charge of planning and overall development impulse and control (until 2000 when
Plaine Commune took over).
• Central Government Regional Administration (Direction Régionale de l’Equipement or
DREIF) : Overall development control (Regional Structure Plan), Strategic area
committee co-leader. World Cup infrastructure and project manager.
• Ile-de-France Regional Council : Infrastructure and urban development funding. Now in
charge of Regional Structure Plan with the State (DREIF).
• Consortium Stade de France : Private 30-year concessionary company of the Stadium in
charge of financing part of the facility and operating the venue.
• City of Paris : Former land owner of stadium area and of Saint-Denis canal. A partnership
agreement with Plaine Commune was approved in 2008.
• EMGP, now Icade EMGP: private developer and investor of about 70 hectares south of
the Plaine Saint-Denis including the Parc des Portes de Paris (business park).
• Other large ‘private’ land owners in the Plaine Saint-Denis playing a part in development:
Electricité de France, Gaz de France, Saint-Gobain.
9
In the early 1990s, the central government set up a local agency to study and discuss
with local authorities and thus prepare the Regional Structure Plan3: the Mission
Plaine Saint-Denis Le Bourget. The approved 1994 Regional Structure Plan4
designated Plaine Saint-Denis as an ‘urban redevelopment centre’ (fig. 4). So there
was really cross-breading between the local approach and the regional approach.
This allowed the area to become a priority area for investment in infrastructure within
the State-Region Joint Investment Programmes (CPER)5 for the 1994-1998
(extended to 1999) and 2000-2006 periods. New transport infrastructures, such as a
new Orbital metro, extensions of an existing line (M12) and a new North-South tram
link across the Plaine, were planned to support the redevelopment.
After negotiations with the municipality of Saint-Denis, the decision was made in
1993 to locate the Stade de France6 in the Plaine. The existence of an ambitious
Urban Project supported by local authorities was a key factor in that decision. The
conditions the City of Saint-Denis negotiated in the so-called ‘Stade de France
Agreements’ were:
• Physical integration of the stadium in a mixed-use urban district (with housing,
offices and leisure).
• Capacity to accelerate the implementation of the Urban Project particularly
through the improvement of public transport in order to limit car access7 and
the building of large new pedestrian public spaces (fig. 5), including the
covering up of the A1 motorway and the creation of public gardens on top.
• Local priority for jobs for the building of the stadium (a PPP project) and
related infrastructure.
In order to prepare the area to host the event, new development agreements8
between the municipalities of Saint-Denis and Aubervilliers were discussed and
3
Schéma directeur régional d’Ile-de-France, or SDRIF.
4
Local (i.e. municipal) urban plans (Plan Local d’Urbanisme) need to conform to the Regional
Structure Plan, but in this case it was not an issue as both levels agreed in broad terms, except on
housing figures: the local authorities did not, at first, want the area to remain a predominantly business
and industrial area.
5
Contrat de Plan Etat-Region or CPER.
6
The name of the stadium, chosen after an open competition, does not refer to France as a nation,
but to the area north of Paris, itself named after the first kingdom of the kings of France.
7
Through renewal of metro M13 station and building of two new rapid transit stations -RER D & B.
8
Contrat de Développement Urbain and Contrat d’Aménagement Régional, or CDU-CAR).
10
finally approved in January 1997. This allowed the area to get extra money, on top of
Stade de France Agrements and the CPER (see box 5), to help finance land
acquisition, public space improvements and the structural budget deficit of most
public-led urban developments areas9. A joint steering committee, with central
government, the Regional Council and the municipalities was set up to coordinate the
regeneration process.
Box 5
Urban development instruments
• Stade de France Agreements (1993) : State – Saint-Denis City – Paris City :
infrastructure & improvements related to the World Cup
• Stadium Building Contract: public-private partnership for design, building, managment of
the facility (1994)
• State – Regional Council Contrat de Plan (CPER in French, i.e. Regional 5-year
Investment Programme)
• Joint Urban Development Agreement (1997) between Central Government, the Regional
Council, and the cities of Aubervilliers and Saint-Denis (Contrat de Développement
Urbain an Contrat de Développement Régional)
• State-Plaine Commune Housing-Office Balance Agreement 2005 (Convention d’équilibre
bureaux-logements) for 1 sq m of offices, Plaine Commune builds 1,12 sq m of housing
(60% private, 40% social).
The new stadium and the quality of new infrastructure built in time for the World Cup
—the largest development in the Plaine for years— radically changed the internal
and external image of the Plaine Saint-Denis. The large and joyful participation of the
people in the event itself contributed to the emergence of a multi-cultural identity,
giving pride to the local communities. All this was of course helped by the victory of
the French football team in 1998! (fig. 7).
Figure 5. The rapid transit station (RER B) and the North-South alley to the Stade de France. Since
the picture was taken in 1998, most industrial sites here have been redeveloped for offices, housing
and facilities. Credits : Gobry-DREIF
9
Each Zone d’Aménagement Concerté needs to be financially balanced.
11
Figure 6. The Plaine Saint Denis seen from with the north with Stadium (top centre),
covering of A1 motorway (centre) and tramway project (lit up line to the right).
Credits : Paul Lecroart - IAU îdf (model : Plaine Commune).
Figure 7. The Stade de France during the 1998 World Cup seen from one of the RER B
rapid transit station. Credits : Gauthier-DREIF.
12
3. After the World Cup: rapid change at different levels
Many businesses wanted to locate near the ‘magic stadium’, so the first
developments to come out were the Stadium district (a 25 hectares mix-use
development led by SANEM, a State-owned public developer) and the Landy France
area (26 hectares office-led mixed-use development, by Plaine Dévelopement, the
main local public developer, see box 6). These were followed by many other
development projects including Pleyel (public-private redevelopments on a 20
hectares area), Nozal-Chaudron (a 17 hectare mainly residential redevelopment) and
Cristino Garcia Landy (a 22 hectare housing district regeneration).
Box 6
Plaine Commune Développement
Created in 1991 to implement the Urban Project for the Plaine Saint-Denis, Plaine Commune
Développement is a joint public urban development company (société d’économie mixte or
SEM) between local authorities (Aubervilliers & Saint-Denis at first, now Plaine Commune)
with a minority participation of central government. It has merged after the World Cup with
the State-led development agency set up to conduct the Stadium facility development and
the Stadium quarter : the SANEM Stade de France. It currently conducts developments such
Landy-France or Nozal-Chaudron (Diderot Quarter). It also contributes to partnership
projects such as Porte d’Aubervilliers-Canal with Icade and studies such as the Proudhon
Gardinoux development.
But it is only recently that some developments areas such as the Porte
d’Aubervilliers-Canal (retail, leisure and residential) and the Porte de Paris (highway
interchange restructuring with office and hotels) have reached approval state. In the
Eastern part of the Plaine, poorly served by public transport10, change is still very
slow to come (fig.6).
Olympic bids
One of the effects of the success of the 1998 World Cup was the confidence it gave
to many decision-makers in central, regional and local government, in the capacity of
Plaine Saint-Denis to host large events. Alongside Paris, the Plaine successfully held
the 2003 World Athletics and the 2007 Rugby World Cup but wasn’t so lucky with its
joint bidding with the City of Paris for the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games (which went
to Beijing and London respectively).
The 2012 Olympic bid attracted more attention to the development potential of the
Plaine and boosted the ambitions for the Paris North East development project on
the southern rim of the area. The Olympic Nautical Stadium which will soon be built in
the Plaine is also among the legacies of the bid.
10
Extension of metro M12 has been postponed many times. It is now planned for completion in 2012,
but the north-south tramway is yet not financed.
13
Figure 8. Office development built around the stadium around the year 2000.
Credits : Paul Lecroart - IAU îdf
14
And the Stade de France remains a very successful 270-day a year multi-use large
event regional facility —not only hosting sport events, but a whole range of activities,
including large shows, concerts, operas, summer beach, corporate conventions, etc.
(fig. 9).
At the end 1999, five of these municipalities decided to join forces and form what is
now Plaine Commune, the local inter-municipal authority with delegated planning and
development powers, and financial solidarity. Today, Plaine Commune involves eight
municipalities (see box 7).
Box 7
Plaine Commune
This inter-municipal association is an ‘urban community’ uniting 8 municipalities of
the northern suburbs of Paris around a common development project. Plaine
Commune has a 42 sq km-large territory with 330,000 inhabitants, 135,000 jobs, and
47,000 students.
It has its own council, and its own tax ressources and budget. It has delegated
powers from the municipalities such as planning and development, environment,
housing and social policies, and tourism policy.
Fig 9a & 9b. (left) Plaine Saint-Denis (grey shaded area) within the 8-municipalities of Plaine
Commune (black contour). (right). Plaine Commune (grey shaded area) within the Plaine de France
area of 2003 (black contour). Credits : IAU îdf
11
The Charte de développement de la Plaine élargie.
15
Since the first years of the development boom (1999-2001), the Plaine Saint-Denis
Project has become a series of individual area-based developments conducted by
different public or private developers. When Hippodamos 93 ceased its activity, the
overall urban design coordination tasks was not fully taken over by the urban
planning department of Plaine Commune.
In 2004 however, Plaine Commune started studying a spatial strategy framework for
its territory (42 km²): The Plaine Commune Masterplan12 which was approved in
2006, has the ambition of converting Plaine Commune into a major centre for the
northern suburbs of Paris, with a goal of 380,000 inhabitants (which implies a 10 per
cent increase from 1999) and 180,000 jobs (a 20 per cent increase) by 2020.
At the sub-regional level, the whole area located between Paris and the Roissy-
Charles de Gaulle international airport13 has been designated as a strategic
development area. A Joint Public Development Agency14 was set up in 2002 (see
box 8). Its 2005 Strategic Plan15 sets vast ambitions of growth and regeneration for
this high-potential but socially-deprived area, with new small and large urban projects
to deliver. However, the implementation of the Plan suffers from a lack of funding and
political will (fig. 10). The Government will issue a new strategy for the area late
2008.
Box 8
EPA Plaine de France
Since its creation in 2000, the Etablissement Public d’Aménagement de la Plaine de France
is in charge of urban planning and regeneration, economical and social development of the
area. The EPA’s is a joint development agency with a board of directors made up of
representatives of the State, the Ile-de-France Regional Council, the two départements of
Seine-Saint-Denis and Val-d’Oise, and 40 municipalities (and their inter-municipal
associations). Its task is to conduct studies, coordinate projects, provide technical and
financial assistance to the local authorities, and develop directly larger, complex or strategic
sites.
Plaine Saint-Denis is also a key driver for the ‘sustainable’ development of a wider
area. This includes the Paris North East Project to the south (1,1 million m² of
redevelopment on a 200-hectares infrastructure area with plans for 25,000 jobs and
10,000 new residents; fig. 11) and the Saint-Ouen Docks Project (a 100-hectares
brownfield regeneration with plans for 770,000 m² of new development). These
projects have led to new discussions on the need for a new coordination structure for
the core area of the Paris region, including the Paris Metropole proposal of the Mayor
of Paris, which could lead to a new metropolitan formal partnership in 2009.
Furthermore the 2007 Draft Regional Structure Plan16 currently under examination,
also recognises the role of the area as a new economic and social hub to counter-
balance the traditional South Western growth trend of the Paris region.
12
The Schéma de coherence territoriale (SCOT), a 20-year strategic and spatial plan for a wide area.
13 nd
The 2 largest airport in Europe.
14
The Etablissement Public d’Aménagement de la Plaine de France.
15
The Document stratégique de référence.
16
Unlike the 1994 (State-led) Regional Structure Plan, the 2007 Plan elaboration is a Regional
Council initiative. When approved, it will become the spatial framework of regional development for up
to 2030.
16
Roissy –
CDG Area
Le Bourget
Plaine
Saint-
Denis
Figure 10. 2005 Strategic Plan of the Plaine de France area. Credits : EPA Plaine de France
Figure 11. Paris North East project and plans for the southern part of the Plaine (Plaine Commune -
Paris boundary in blue). Credits : Dusapin – Leclercq, Architects & Planners
17
Figure 12. Ongoing developments and projects in the Plaine Saint-Denis 1998-2007 (working document).
Residential are in blue, office in orange, facilities in red. Credits : Plaine Commune
18
4. Plaine Saint-Denis, today and tomorrow
Moreover, it still host hundreds of small and medium businesses in different fields of
activities.
19
Figures 13. Works have started to make the view of the place du Front
Populaire around the future metro station (M12) a reality.
Credits : Dusapin – Leclercq, Architects & Planners
Figures 14 & 15. View of the Landy-France development area (left) with the future convention centre,
hotel complex (top, towers opposite the Stade de France), and film production studios. Credits :
Lipsky + Rollet Architects. The plans include high environmental quality offices (right). Credits :
Chaix & Morel Architects
Figure 16 and 17. New development in old warehouses south of La Plaine by Icade (left). New social
rented housing around a square in the Montjoie area (right). Credits : P. Lecroart - IAU îdf
20
Difficulties and challenges
The success of the urban regeneration is not uniform, some areas of the Plaine —
such as the eastern and northern parts, the canal side and Seine waterfront— have
been left out. One reason is the delay in realising the transport infrastructure such as
the north-south tramway, the extension of the M12 metro line, and also the Orbital
metro network which was planned in 1994 but for which no decision has yet been
taken.
Some sub-standard housing has not yet been renovated despite the efforts of Plaine
Commune. The environment has not improved in some areas, with a lack of large
green spaces17 - and major highway interchanges still scar the landscape18.
Public investment
The total public money invested by the central government and the Regional Council,
with contributions from local authorities, in the Plaine for land acquisition, major
transport and other infrastructure is estimated at M€ 740 for the 1994-1999 period
(including the public part of the stadium, M€ 190), and approximately M€ 450 for the
2000-2006 period. However, the needs of Plaine Saint Denis are probably twice as
high. In the next years (2007-2013 Contrat de Projet), national and regional spending
will go mostly to other areas to the north of the Plaine de France where needs are
even greater. One exception is the M€ 430 public investment in the new Campus
Condorcet recently decided by the Government, which is to be developed in the
Aubervilliers and Paris North East areas.
17
The Canal-Park project studied by IAURIF with Hippodamos 93 has seen little implementation to
this day.
18
The redesigning schemes for the Porte de la Chapelle (Périphérique interchange south of the
Plaine) and Porte de Paris (A1 interchange north) have been approved, but not the one for the Pleyel
junction (A86 motorway)
21
• The ‘World Cup effect’ was successfully used, with key-investments sparking
off the regeneration dynamic, changing the image, and building trust in the
whole process.
• The concept of the area regeneration as a multi-functional, mixed-use, and
innovative urban area, not a CBD. The flexibility of the Urban Project meant
that it was possible to fit the Stadium into the plan and also to keep productive
activities and existing structures and buildings as long as possible.
• There has been good coordination and consistency between the 1991 Urban
Project approach, the area-based development, and the statutory plans : the
1994 Regional Structure Plan, the revised local plans, and the recent Plaine
Commune Master Plan.
• These plans have been closely related with sector-based plans and policies of
Plaine Commune, such as the Economic Strategy, the Housing Plan, the
Social Regeneration Policies, the Retail Structure Plan, the Environment Plan,
etc.
• A rare result: Re-development without gentrification. There are more jobs and
people by 2020 than ever before, without the gentrification process which
large projects often imply, thanks to public land acquisition policies and public
housing policies.
Weaker points
• The area was not really planned as a regional urban centre, only as a local
regeneration: It lacks a real ‘city feeling’, a real heart, with vibrant urban
intensity. Many urban functions (ie: shops, leisure and cultural facilities) are
spread out in the large area or cater mainly for local needs.
• As in many large-scale projects, there is still a mismatch between new job
opportunities and local skills. This is now been tackled through agreements
signed between businesses, training institutions and local authorities.
• There is still lack of medium- and high-income families, and also of old people.
A more balanced social and generation mix is still to come. On the other hand,
low-income residents and businesses are increasingly threatened by rising
land prices and rents.
• There is a need to improve and reinforce the quality and maintenance of the
public realm, as well as architectural and urban design, and environmental
standards : Plaine Commune is currently working of these topics.
19
From 1991 to 2004, the Assises de la Plaine was a yearly open forum where decision-makers,
businesses, local trade-unions, urban planners and residents could debate about the implementation
of the Urban Project and the future of the Plaine. The ‘Démarche Quartiers’ is a ongoing community
and district management approach dealing with everyday problems and projects at a local level.
22
• All this has contributed to build trust between public authorities and private
parties: developers, investors and final users are now being involved upstream
in the different development schemes, which was not the case before.
Weaker points
• The overall process has been relatively slow. It took almost 15 years from the
creation of Plaine Renaissance to the growth boom of the very late 1990s.
• This is related to the fact the existing governance structure is not at the right
level. After 1999, the joint strategic project committee ceased to function, with
the result that strategic regional issues have often come second to local
issues. The sheer number of players with different interests requires more
coordination.
• The overall ambition and spatial vision can sometimes get lost in area-based
development procedures and short-term logic. After 2000, the Urban Project
was not updated and the previous role of Hippodamos 93 has not been fully
taken over by Plaine Commune.
• Government and regional investments are not sufficient to address the needs.
As a result, infrastructure improvements have been postponed many times:
Extension of the M12 metro line, North-South Plaine tramway, Orbital metro,
restructuring of major interchanges, new road links above the canal and
railway tracks, Canal-Park, some educational and training facilities, etc.
Conclusions
Urban decline can be a rapid phenomena, but regeneration is slow at first, then —
once trust is back— things can go very quickly, as if life had to catch up. The Plaine
Saint-Denis area took off after the 1998 World Cup— 5 years after the wise decision
to locate there the Stade de France (1993) and over 10 years after the start of the
regeneration process. The strength of Plaine Saint-Denis regeneration approach is
that it is not a single flagship project, but a coherent spatial vision and strategy.
However, with the market-forces now supporting the process, initial ambitions and
government support have weakened. This could in turn weaken the consistency and
quality of the final result.
However, in many aspects, the Plaine Saint-Denis regeneration process stands out
among other large-scale urban projects as trying out an original and interesting path
to sustainable development. Halfway from the initial time-frame (2015), a lot has
been achieved, probably more remains to be done. Unlike some ‘turn-key
redevelopments’, the future of the Plaine Saint-Denis remains very open.
23
Sources
Davoine, G. (1999) ‘The Plaine Saint Denis: the emergence of a diverse city’. AMC
Moniteur Architecture, Paris, December.
Vigier, D. (2007) ‘Plaine Saint Denis: Key Dates and Landmarks’, Plaine Commune,
22 November (www.iau-idf.fr).
www.iau-idf.fr
www.plainecommune.fr
www.plainedefrance.fr
24