International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 30 Number 1 - December 2015

Upgrade Reliability for Novel Identity-Based Batch

Verification Scheme in VANET
S. Naveena devi1, M. Mailsamy2 and N. Malathi3,
1
PG Scholar, 2Assistant Professor, 3Assistant Professor
1, 2, 3
Dept. of Information Technology,
Vivekananda College of Engineering for Women,
Tiruchengode-637205

Abstract: A novel Identity-based Batch Verification schedule the route to the vehicle. The TA can
Scheme in Vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) can communicate via a road side unit (RSU).In RSU is
outstandingly improve the traffic safety and a communication between the TA and OBU. In
effectiveness. The basic idea is to allow vehicles to OBU to commune with roadside units (RSUs)
send traffic message to roadside units (RSUs) or situated at roadside or street intersection. Vehicles
other vehicles. Vehicles have to be prohibited from can also use OBUs to commune with each other.
some attacks on their privacy and misuse of their VANET can be classifying into two types: vehicle-
private data. For this reason, the security and to-infrastructure (V2I) communication or inter-
privacy protection issues are important vehicle (V2V) communication. The basic use of
prerequisites for VANET. The Novel identity-based VANET is that OBUs at regular intervals transmit
batch verification scheme was newly future to make information on their nearby states. The information
VANET more secure and efficient for practical use. like current time, position, direction, speed and
The current IBV system exist some security risks. traffic events are passed to other nearby vehicles
To set up an improved scheme that can satisfy the and RSUs. For example, the traffic actions could be
security and isolation desired by vehicles. The accident location, brake light warning, change
proposed NIBV scheme provides the verifiable lane/merge traffic warning, emergency vehicle
security in the casual Mysql model. In addition, the warning, etc. Other vehicles may modify their
batch confirmation of the proposed scheme needs travelling routers and RSUs may inform the traffic
only effectual approach for VSNs to achieve control centre to alter traffic lights for avoiding
confirmation, reliability, and authority. However, possible traffic jamming. VANET offers a variety
when the number of signatures received by a of services and profit to users, and thus deserve
Roadside Unit(RSU) becomes bulky, a scalability deployment efforts. The wonderful benefits
problem appear immediately, where theRSU could expected from vehicular communications and the
be difficult to consecutively verify each received enormous number of vehicles, it is clear that
signature within 300 ms period according to the vehicular communications are probable to become
current committed short range communications the most relevant understanding of mobile ad hoc
broadcast protocol. To introduce a new identity- networks. The appropriate integration of on-board
based batch verification scheme for transportation units and position devices, such as GPS receivers
between vehicles and RSUs, in which an RSU can along with communiqué capabilities, opens
confirm abundant received signatures at the same marvelous business opportunities, but also raises
instance such that the total verification time can be alarming research challenges.
drastically reduced.
The protection of communication
Index Terms: Authenticity, novel batch exchange acting a key task in VANET applications.
verification, Privacy, Vehicular ad-hoc network. The message from OBUs has to be identity-
authenticated and integrity-checked before it can be
I. INTRODUCTION trust on. Otherwise, an opponent can change the
information or even masquerade as other vehicles
VANETs are a subgroup of mobile ad-hoc to transmit the wrong information. The wrong
networks. The main difference is that the mobile information probably makes some bad situation.
routers construction the network are vehicles like For example, the information of incorrect traffic
cars or trucks and their movement is controlled by flow may reason the traffic control centre to make
factors like road route, surrounding traffic and wrong decision. The traffic light of the heavy side
traffic system. It is a feasible supposition that the always stay red and the other side stay green. In
members of VANETs can connect to fixed addition, an opponent may portray an ambulance to
networks like the Internet occasionally, at least at require the traffic light to help with her/him and
usual service intervals. A main goal of VANETs is break the driving right of other users.
to enhance road safety. In VANET they have three
important entities like trusted authority, road side A driver may not wish for others to know
unit, on board unit. In trusted authority (TA) her/his travelling routes by tracing information sent

ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 4

 International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 30 Number 1 - December 2015

by OBU. Or else, it is hard to draw users to link the users by nameless certificates. The conservative
network. So, an nameless communication is public key infrastructure is adopt as the security
needed. On the opposing, traceability is also base to achieve both message verification and
necessary where a vehicle’s real identity should be integrity. The main problem is that each vehicle
able to be exposed by a trust authority for legal loads a large storage capability to save a number of
responsibility issue when crimes or accidents key pairs and the matching certificates, and incur
happen. For example, a driver who sent out false the high cost of message verification.
information causing an accident should not be
clever to escape by using a nameless identity. In III. PRELIMINARIES
other words, vehicles in VANET need the
provisional privacy. SYSTEM MODEL
Our main aid in the paper is given as
follows: Specified the security issues of avoiding The structure model consists of four entities
incorrect information and the contradictory goals of like trust authority, application servers, roadside
isolation and traceability. The proposed new units and on-board units (OBUs) install on
identity based batch verification scheme can be vehicles. A two-layer vehicular network model was
used in both V2I and V2V communications. The address in recent research .The top layer is a trusted
new IBV scheme can endure our future threats such authority and application servers. TA and
as the identity privacy violation, fake and anti- application servers converse with RSUs through
traceability attacks. Compare to the preceding secure channel, the transport layer security
schemes, the future new IBV scheme is efficient in protocol, by wired relations. The lower layer is
computational cost of confirmation delay. It is embrace of vehicles and RSUs. The communiqué
since the process of batch verification needs only a amongst them is based on the dedicated short range
small stable number of pairing and point increase communications protocol. The VANET security
computations. In new identity batch verification standard, every vehicle has its own public/private
scheme can improving the security using efficient key pairs distributed by TA. Before messages are
algorithm like symmetric encryption algorithm and transmit, vehicles contain to sign the messages with
new identity based batch verification algorithm. their private keys to assurance the honesty of
messages. Delivery the safety related or non-traffic
II. RELATED WORKS related message, each RSU or vehicle is
accountable for verify their signatures of messages.
In 2015, Shiang-Feng Tzeng, Shi-Jinn Horng [1]
proposed a scheme to point out that the present
IBV scheme survive some security risks. To
introduce an improved scheme that can satisfy the
security and privacy needed by vehicles. The IBV
scheme provides the demonstrable security in the
random oracle model. Lee and Lai [2] described the
two weakness of et al.’s IBV scheme. First, Zhang
et al.’s IBV system is susceptible on the replay
attack. An opponent may replicate a false
condition, such as traffic squash, by collect and
store the vehicle messages and signatures in the
matching condition. In 2013, Shi-Jinn Horng,
Shiang-Feng Tzeng [3], SPECS provided software
based key to satisfy the solitude requirement and
gave inferior message slide and more successful
rate than earlier result in the message verification
phase. To find out that SPECS is vulnerable to
imitation attack. SPECS have a pour such that a
spiteful vehicle can force random vehicles to
broadcast fake messages to other vehicles. In 2008, Fig 1: The System Model
Zhang et al [4] proposed an identity-based batch
1) TA is totally confidential by everybody and it is
verification system for V2I and V2V infrastructure
motorized with enough calculation and storage
in VANET. They adopt a one-time identity-based
ability. The laid off TA are installing to keep away
signature, which eliminate the confirmation and
from being a bottleneck or a solitary point of
broadcast costs of certificate for public key. It
failure.2) TA is the only can decide the vehicle’s
reduces the general verification delay of a lot of
real individuality but not by other vehicles or RSU.
message signatures. In 2007, Raya and Hubaux [5]
3) TA and RSUs converse via a secure fixed
proposed a scheme to conceal the real identities of
network.

ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 5

 International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 30 Number 1 - December 2015

4) RSUs are not confidential. As they are located and provides high performance in novel IBV
down road side, they can be simply co-operation. scheme. (11)Advanced symmetric key algorithm
They are inquisitive about vehicle’s seclusion. can be used to novel identity based batch
5) Tamper-proof devices on vehicles are supposed verification. (12)Novel identity based batch
to be believable and its information is for no reason verification algorithm can be used to improving a
to been reveal. The WAVE standard, every OBU is security of a VANET and also improving a speed
capable with a hardware security module , which is and performance.
a tamper-resistant module used to accumulate the
security resources The HSM in each OBU is V. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
accountable for drama all the cryptographic process
such as signing messages, keys update. It is hard The computation delay is the mainly
for lawful OBUs to take out their private keys from important issue, which affect the worth of traffic
their tamper-proof devices. The system has its linked messages. To describe the time charge of the
individual clock for make accurate timestamp and cryptographic linked operations necessary in each
is clever to sprint on its individual battery. TA, signing and verification by the novel IBV scheme
RSUs and OBUs have approximately coordinated and other batch verification schemes.
clocks.
In fig.2 is comparison between
computations delay and verify a signing message.
ADVERSARY MODEL A previous IBV schemes they have more delay for
verifying a message. Previous IBV scheme have a
All participating RSUs and OBUs are not delay of 9.6 in verification and 0.6 in sign message.
believable and the communication channel is not
protected. An opponent is able to performing the
following without the novel IBV scheme.

1) An opponent may adjust or repeat existing

messages, even an opponent may disperse or mimic
any rightful vehicle to produce incorrect
information into the scheme to influence the
behavior of other users or damage the
transportation of VANET.

2) An opponent may draw the real identity of any

vehicle and can disclose the vehicle’s real identity
by analyzing many messages sent by it.

IV. PROPOSED SYSTEM

Fig 2: Comparison of computational delay to verify
and signing message
(1)The OBU of the vehicle broadcast or distribute
traffic information to RSU or nearby vehicles. To proposed a novel IBV scheme having a 5.0 in
(2)RSU verify the traffic information and send to verification delay and 0.5 in signing a message.
the TA. (3)TA schedules the route of the vehicles,
which route is traffic free and shortest. (4)To Fig. 3 indicates the connection between the
applying a dynamic routing algorithm find shortest transmission overhead and the number of messages
energetic routers without traffic. (5)Energy level received by an RSU in 10 seconds. As the number
should be increased in vehicular networks during of messages increases, the transmission overhead
that time of providing high security. (6)To apply a increases linearly. The transmission overhead of
novel identity based batch verification algorithm the novel IBV system
deducts the hacking packets and also find, which
vehicle can be create it. To compromise the
particular hacking vehicles master keys. (7)To
apply a novel identity based batch verification
scheme provide high security and high performance
for vehicular networks.
(8)Compare to existing system, High Security can
be provided. RSU extend network range. (9)In
novel identity based batch verification scheme
easily identify the changed information and
difficult to access the information without signature
key. (10)TA easily fined the duplicate information

ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 6

 International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 30 Number 1 - December 2015

invalid signature problem is a challenging and a

topic for study in our future research.

VIII. REFERENCE

[1] Shiang-Feng Tzeng, Shi-Jinn Horng, “Enhancing security

and privacy scheme for identity based batch verification scheme
in VANET,” IEEE Transaction on Vehicular technology, 2015.
[2]C. C. Lee and Y. M. Lai, “Toward a secure batch verification
with group testing for VANET,” Wireless Networks, vol. 19, no.
6, pp. 1441-1449, 2013.
[3]Shi-Jinn Horng, Shiang-Feng Tzeng, “b-SPECS+: Batch
Verification for Secure
Pseudonymous Authentication in VANET”, information
forensics and security, vol. 8, no. 11, November 2013.
[4]C. Zhang, R. Lu, X. Lin, P. H. Ho, and X. Shen, “An efficient
identity-based batch verification scheme for vehicular sensor
networks,” in Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International
Fig 3: Transmission overhead with Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’08), pp.
number of message received 816-824, 2008.
[5] M. Raya and J. P. Hubaux, “Securing vehicular ad hoc
is least among the four schemes. Here, 45,000 networks,” Journal of Computer Security – Special Issue
Security Ad Hoc Sensor Networks, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 39-68,
correspond to the number of messages transmitted 2007.
by 150 vehicles in 10 seconds. The previous IBV
systems they have transmitted by 150 vehicles in
30 seconds.

VI. CONCLUSION
To proposed an efficient identity-based
batch verification (NIBV) scheme for vehicle-to-
infrastructure and inter-vehicle communications in
vehicular ad hoc network (VANET). The batch-
based verification for multiple message signatures
is more efficient than one-by-one single
verification when the receiver has to confirm a
large number of messages In particular; the batch
verification process of the proposed NIBV scheme
needs only a constant number of pairing and point
multiplication computations, independent of the
number of message signatures. The proposed NIBV
scheme is secure against existential forgery in the
random oracle model under the computational
Diffie-Hellman problem. In the performance
analysis, we have evaluated the proposed NIBV
scheme with other batch verification schemes in
terms of computation delay and transmission
overhead. Moreover, we verify the efficiency and
practicality of the proposed scheme by the
simulation analysis. Simulation results show that
both the average message delay and message loss
rate of the proposed IBV scheme are less than those
of the existing schemes.

VII. FUTURE WORK

In the future work, we will continue our

efforts to enhance the features of IBV scheme for
VANET, such as recognizing illegal signatures.
When attackers send some invalid messages, the
batch verification may lose its efficacy. This
problem commonly accompanies other batch-based
verification schemes. Therefore, thwarting the

ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 7