Bill of Rights: April 18, 2016 Content Team 2 Comments
Bill of Rights: April 18, 2016 Content Team 2 Comments
Bill of Rights: April 18, 2016 Content Team 2 Comments
When the newly created Congress met for the first time, they addressed these
concerns, creating amendments to the Constitution guaranteeing certain rights to the
people. The first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution are known as the “Bill of
Rights.” To explore this concept, consider the following Bill of Rights definition.
“The Bill of Rights” is the name used to refer to the first 10 amendments to the U.S.
Constitution. Each of the 10 amendments guarantees some essential right that should
be afforded to all people, or places specific limitations on the powers of the federal
government. After the Constitution was drafted, it had to be approved by
representatives of each state before it could be put into effect.
Supporters of the Constitution, known as “Federalists,” began lobbying for its approval,
going to great lengths to explain the benefits of the document. These people included
such founding fathers as George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander
Hamilton, among others. Several of these men wrote a series of articles for a
newspaper called “The Federalist.” The articles explained how the Constitution would
work, and how it would be beneficial to the people. They even addressed questions
about, and criticisms of, the Constitution in an understandable manner.
Other people were opposed to the Constitution, fearing that it gave too much power to a
centralized government, which could overpower and suppress the individual states.
These people, known as “Antifederalists,” worried that having a president and congress
with long terms could result in the creation of an aristocratic class that controlled the
nation. Having fled a country controlled by a monarchy, this was a serious concern for
all of the colonists. Specifically, the Antifederalists, including such people as Sam
Adams, George Mason, Patrick Henry, and George Clinton, felt the document lacked a
“bill of rights,” listing specific freedoms or rights that cannot be taken away by the
government.
Discussions took only a few months, and on September 25, 1789, Congress approved
12 amendments to the Constitution. The amendments were then submitted to the states
for ratification, just as the original Constitution had been. Nine of those amendments
were ratified and became Amendments One through Ten of the Constitution on
December 15, 1791. Another of those amendments, one that kept Congress from
making any increase to their own salaries, specifying that any such change could not go
into effect until the start of the next term, was not ratified until May 7, 1992 – two
hundred years later.
First Amendment
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
The First Amendment protects five of the people’s most basic rights:
1. Freedom of Religion
2. Freedom of Speech
3. Freedom of the Press
4. Freedom of Assembly
5. Freedom to Petition the Government
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the
people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
“No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of
the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”
The police suspect that a student at Emily’s high school is selling drugs. They cannot
search the homes of every student looking for clues. In fact, even if they strongly
suspect only one or two specific students, they cannot search their homes or their
belongings without a court order. In this example of Bill of Rights protection, the police
would need to bring evidence that supports their suspicion in order to obtain a search
warrant for certain specific students, certain specific areas to be searched, and specific
things to be searched for.
Fifth Amendment – Rights of the Accused, Due Process of Law, and Eminent Domain
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on
a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval
forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall
any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb;
nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be
deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private
property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
The Fifth Amendment protects the rights of a person suspected of, or charged with, a
crime, guaranteeing due process of law. It protects against double jeopardy, which is to
try a person more than once for the same crime. It also guarantees that any person
accused of a crime is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty. This amendment also
prohibits the forcing of someone to testify against himself. This goes on to require that
law enforcement officials provide evidence sufficient to convict the individual, as the
accused cannot be made to provide it.
The final section addresses what is known as “eminent domain.” It specifies that the
government cannot take a person’s property for public use, without just compensation.
Today it is not uncommon for a municipality (a city, county, state, or other government
entity) to take land for the purpose of building something that is needed for the common
good of the people. However, the Fifth Amendment requires that those people be
compensated a fair amount for their property.
Sixth Amendment – Fair and Speedy Trial
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public
trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been
committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be
informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to
have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.”
“In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the
right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise
reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the
common law.”
Sonja stormed out of the store and promptly filed a civil lawsuit, asking for the $129 plus
tax, $120 for the replacement chain she purchased elsewhere, and $1,000 pain and
suffering. Not only was Sonja asking for more than the value of the item, but she
demanded a jury trial.
The Seventh Amendment states that any matter in which the value of the item in dispute
exceeds $20 is subject to the right of trial by jury. Sonja’s lawsuit is filed in the state
court, however, which does not provide an option for jury trial for matters whose value is
under $10,000. In this example of Bill of Rights protections, no matter how angry Sonja
is, her lawsuit will be heard by a judge at a bench trial.
“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.”
The Eighth Amendment protects people from unreasonably high bail to get out of jail
before trial. This is dependent on the circumstances, however, such as the violent
nature of the crime, and whether or not the individual is likely to flee. It also prohibits
unreasonably high fines, and outlaws cruel and unusual punishment in sentencing.
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people.”
The Tenth Amendment emphasizes the belief that the federal government holds only
those powers and responsibilities specifically discussed in the Constitution, and that all
others are reserved to the individual states, and to the people. This amendment does
not give new powers to the states, but specifically safeguards their authority over all
matters that are not specifically granted to the federal government.
The freedoms and rights granted by the Bill of Rights are intended to ensure all people
have access to due process, and to the court system. Unfortunately, in recent decades,
these privileges have been greatly abused, with people bringing silly and frivolous
matters to be decided by the courts, or worse – by a jury.
Such lawsuits have the effect of quashing the liberties of others. For instance, in 2004, a
man enjoying the public swimming pool with his family jumped into the pool and cut his
heel quite severely. The area from which the man had jumped was clearly marked on
the cement under his feet that no jumping was allowed, and he had also been warned
by the lifeguard not to jump from that spot. The man disregarded these safety warnings
and paid the price.
The man filed a civil lawsuit against the public pool asking for $100,000 as payment of
his medical bills, lost work, and pain and suffering, citing that doctors did not know how
long it would take for the wounds to heal, nor how long it might be before the man would
be able to stand all day, as required by his job. The man settled with the pool’s owner,
but fear of “copycat” lawsuits led to the pool’s closure.
Frivolous use of the nation’s court systems often has the effect of infringing on the rights
and liberties of others. In this example of Bill of Rights abuse, children and families of
the depressed neighborhood lost their place for safe recreation because one man
thought the rules did not apply to him, and that he was entitled to some type of
compensation for his own stupidity.