PP Vs Grospe
PP Vs Grospe
PP Vs Grospe
Menu
J U S T A N O T H E R M O M M Y B L O G G E R F R O M A S I A ' S L AT I N C I T Y
FACTS:
After proceeding
with the trial
against
respondent-
accused for
violation of Batas
Pambansa Blg. 22
and the crime of
estafa, respondent
judge dismissed
the cases for lack
of jurisdiction. The
People led a petition for certiorari challenging the dismissal of
the two criminal cases.
ISSUE(S):
Whether or not respondent-accused will be placed in double
jeopardy if the dismissal will be set aside.
HELD:
NO. The questioned judgment was not an adjudication on the
merits. It was a dismissal upon respondent judge’s erroneous
conclusion that his court had no “territorial jurisdiction” over
the cases. The dismissal being null and void, the proceedings
before the trial court may not be said to have been lawfully
terminated. There is therefore no second proceeding which
would subject the accused to double jeopardy.
www.thezamboanguena.com/2017/12/people-v-grospe-g-r-nos-74053-54-20-jan-1988-157-scra-154/ 1/6
9/1/2020 People v Grospe; G.R. Nos. 74053-54; 20 Jan 1988; 157 SCRA 154 – The Zamboangueña
Menu
Discounts Up to 20%
MR.DIY proudly supports local brands! Get 20% discount on
selected products this September
MR.DIY OPEN
Free sms text messages Facebook Free message text Chance to win
Check my grades online Claudine Constitutional Law Conviction Cookie
Comments
There are no comments posted yet. Be the rst one!
www.thezamboanguena.com/2017/12/people-v-grospe-g-r-nos-74053-54-20-jan-1988-157-scra-154/ 2/6
9/1/2020 People v Grospe; G.R. Nos. 74053-54; 20 Jan 1988; 157 SCRA 154 – The Zamboangueña
Menu
Money Challenge back to work Bersamin blogging Carpio
52-Week Case Digests
cheese Chico-Nazario Commercial Law Constitutional Law 1
Constitutional Law 2 Corona Credit Transactions Criminal
Procedure cupcakes del Castillo depression DSLR camera featured ashcards gadgets herstory
Mercantile Law My Kimcheed Life
J.B.L. Reyes lipstick macapuno makeup Mendoza
Negotiable Instruments Law new year Panganiban Peralta Perlas-Bernabe
Political Law purple yam red Remedial Law resolutions saving up separation
A R C H I V E S
Select Month
C A T E G O R I E S
Select Category
B L O G S T A T S
270,233 hits
R E C E N T C O M M E N T S
HAI on
1 CIR v Seagate Technology (Philippines); G.R. No. 153866; 11
Feb 2005
Joyce Barrameda on
2 #LostStudent Blogger
Char on
3 New Year, New Me: Saving Up
www.thezamboanguena.com/2017/12/people-v-grospe-g-r-nos-74053-54-20-jan-1988-157-scra-154/ 5/6
9/1/2020 People v Grospe; G.R. Nos. 74053-54; 20 Jan 1988; 157 SCRA 154 – The Zamboangueña
Menu
Enter text right here!
Displayed next to your Not displayed publicly. If you have a website, link to
comments. it here.
Submit Comment
Subscribe to None
Search...
Marcari, Russotto,
Spencer & Balaban
GET STARTED
I N S T A G R A M
www.thezamboanguena.com/2017/12/people-v-grospe-g-r-nos-74053-54-20-jan-1988-157-scra-154/ 3/6
9/1/2020 People v Grospe; G.R. Nos. 74053-54; 20 Jan 1988; 157 SCRA 154 – The Zamboangueña
R E C E N T P O S T S
Menu
Let Us Master the Rules on Civil Procedure
On Graduating, Bar Review Plans, and Codal Flashcards
People of the Philippines v Jean Arnault; G.R. No. L-4288; 20 Nov 1952; 092 Phil 252
CIR v Philippine Daily Inquirer, Inc.; G.R. No. 213943; 22 Mar 2017
CIR v Philippine Global Communication, Inc.; G.R. No. 167146; 31 Oct 2006
F O L L O W M E O N S O C I A L M E D I A
www.thezamboanguena.com/2017/12/people-v-grospe-g-r-nos-74053-54-20-jan-1988-157-scra-154/ 6/6
9/1/2020 People v Grospe; G.R. Nos. 74053-54; 20 Jan 1988; 157 SCRA 154 – The Zamboangueña
Menu
Follow on Instagram
Marcari,
Russotto,
Spencer &
Balaban
Think you need a
lawyer after an
accident?
GET STARTED
855-435-7247
T A G S
www.thezamboanguena.com/2017/12/people-v-grospe-g-r-nos-74053-54-20-jan-1988-157-scra-154/ 4/6